CPU 100% seeing HPMSN083.DLL (runapp.dll)

We installed several HP laserjet p1606 printers on our print server and now we're seeing the CPU spiking at 100% and drilling into it we see HPMSN083.DLL!MonitorPrintJobStatusW+02...
When we kill it is kills the print spooler. What is this and how do we get rid of it? We disabled the status message in the printer properties (Properties/Device Settings) and it still spikes and kills the print server and no one can print.

Hi Phil
It worked with stdcall (WINAPI) selected!! Thank you so much.
Also, your original comment about 100% CPU use reminds my ...
I was building an industrial control system around a set of GPIB
instruments and needed a single switch input to the program. I
used the (old fashioned) joystick port switch, on the assumption that
this had hardware interrupts and would be essentially invisible to the
processor. This worked well. The program is still working
after 2 years and > 60,000 tests
The second model had a PC without a joystick, so I hacked a really
cheap USB joystick for the same function. While it worked, it
appeared that the processor was very busy and was not running my
program as it should. The joystick regularly disappeared and
required re-inserting. I gave up and used a digital line in on
the NI card that we then purchased, with no problems. I didn't
investigate at the time but maybe the USB interface was gobbling up the
processor time.
I will need to consider this with the Velleman card.
Cheers and thanks again.
John Y

Similar Messages

CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft iMac

Hi There!
As the title says, "CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft". Every time I boot up Minecraft the Fan becomes loud. I have another iMac (Late 2013) Model and it runs Minecraft fine with all the same settings. So I don't really no what to do. But if you could help me try to get the CPU usage down or maybe turn the fan down? Or something like that that would be great!!
My iMac Specs.
Mac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014)
Processor: 4 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory: 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
Graphics: AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB
So Yeah, if you could give me a hand, I would be so much appreciated!
Thanks!

Firefox 3.6.6 Windows XP - often goes to 80-100% CPU even with only one tab open (in this case the one I'm writing this message on). When this happens the only cure is to kill it with task manager and start again.

MOVED: [Athlon64] CPU cant see my other HD I want to use for storage

This topic has been moved to AMD64 nVidia Based board.
[Athlon64] CPU cant see my other HD I want to use for storage

...put the SATA drive in and start it up to make sure it's still working...if it's OK, shut it down...
...remove the jumper from the Western Digital 40GB drive...connect it to the far end of an IDE cable...connect the other end to your motherboard...start your machine...
...after Windows boots click Start > right-click My Computer > Manage > highlight Disk Management in the left pane > see if the 40GB is there > it should be > click the drive in the right pane > Action > All Tasks > Format...after Fomat you may have to go back to Action > All Tasks > Mark Partition As Active...

Sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent mac air os 10.8.2 cpu 100%

sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent (mac air 4,2 2011 mid) os 10.8.2 cpu 100% ? why..?

sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent (mac air 4,2 2011 mid) os 10.8.2 cpu 100% ? why..?

G580(20150) CPU 100%

При добавлении или уменьшении гровкости, а так же яркости экрана с помощью кнорки Fn +нужная стрелочка вылазит сообщение. В заголовке написано "Energy Managment", сообщение внутри окна"CPU 100%" и кнопка "OK". Посмотрев по диспетчеру задач процессор не загружается на 100 процентов, а просто выскакивает окно. Которое мешает постоянно. Как исправить? Спасибо заранее за ответ.

Приветствую
Никаких других идей, кроме удаления и переустановки драйвера Lenovo Energy Management лично у меня нет. Вы не назвали ОС, для win8.1, например, есть два разных релиза, для разных платформ ноутов. Для 20150:
http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/lenovo-g-series-laptops/lenovo-g580-notebook/20150/downloads/DS037135

Lenovo S10-1 CPU 100%

Hello
I have S10-2 with Windows 7 Home edition. Problem is when I have open 2 or three windows explorer and maybe 2 google chrome windows CPU goes to 100%. Is there some controller problem or something else. Same problem if I copy some files from USB removable disk to my local disk and open internet explorer. Again CPU 100%
Thanks for answers
Marko

Hi and welcome...
agreed ... depends on memory, energyprofile, and usage of background tasks (there are a few
Quote "" Same problem if I copy some files from USB removable disk to my local disk""
... USB to HDD transfer is indeed a huge process for our Intel N270/945 combo ...
where a C2D have enough power ... our N270/945 comes to sweat ... if you get him more tasks, while usb transfer to hdd, so give them a bit time
.. its a netbook not a subnote or note .... some times we forgot this..
because all other things is nearly managed with same performance with this small device ...
sincerely KalvinKlein
Thinkies 2x X200s/X301 8GB 256GB SSD @ Win 7 64
Ideas Centre A520 ,Yoga 2 256GB SSD,Yoga 2 tablet @ Win 8.1

一条SQL占用CPU 100%

一个查询语句执行时占用单核CPU资源100%,请帮忙分析原因。
SQL及执行计划如下:
*** 2012-08-29 11:46:25.764
WAIT #9: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 16994971 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142349078
STAT #7 id=1 cnt=3 pid=0 pos=1 obj=0 op='HASH GROUP BY (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=75576024 us)'
STAT #7 id=2 cnt=3 pid=1 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=22207347 us)'
STAT #7 id=3 cnt=20138 pid=2 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=58213 pr=0 pw=0 time=503569 us)'
STAT #7 id=4 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=1 obj=16923 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=17935 pr=0 pw=0 time=161196 us)'
STAT #7 id=5 cnt=20138 pid=4 pos=1 obj=16925 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ_SP (cr=205 pr=0 pw=0 time=20201 us)'
STAT #7 id=6 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=40278 pr=0 pw=0 time=263247 us)'
STAT #7 id=7 cnt=20138 pid=6 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=20140 pr=0 pw=0 time=130059 us)'
STAT #7 id=8 cnt=3 pid=2 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=8224975 pr=0 pw=0 time=75131469 us)'
STAT #7 id=9 cnt=3 pid=8 pos=1 obj=16309 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN BM_BMDM (cr=8224972 pr=0 pw=0 time=75063047 us)'
STAT #7 id=10 cnt=12084 pid=9 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8204832 pr=0 pw=0 time=74863852 us)'
STAT #7 id=11 cnt=3452523 pid=10 pos=1 obj=16924 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=1287698 pr=0 pw=0 time=34756285 us)'
STAT #7 id=12 cnt=12084 pid=10 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=6917134 pr=0 pw=0 time=36180549 us)'
STAT #7 id=13 cnt=3452523 pid=12 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=3464611 pr=0 pw=0 time=17895710 us)'
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #5 len=985 dep=0 uid=36 oct=3 lid=36 tim=1314660142349798 hv=3549420567 ad='fb568520'
SELECT C.BMDM,
C.DEPT_NAME,
A.XSSD1,
A.XSSD2,
0 XSJE,
0 XSBS,
0 YHJE,
0 XSJE_BHQ,
SUM (A.XSJE) OLD_XSJE,
SUM (A.YHJE) OLD_YHJE,
SUM (A.XSJE - A.YHJE) OLD_XSJE_BHQ,
SUM (A.XSBS) OLD_XSBS,
0 COMPARE,
0 KDJ,
0 OLD_KDJ,
0 KDJ_BHQ,
0 OLD_KDJ_BHQ
FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ A, BM B, BM C
WHERE A.DEPTID = B.DEPTID
AND SUBSTR (B.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
AND A.JZRQ = '2012-8-22'
AND NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 1
FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ Z1, BM B1
WHERE Z1.XSSD1 = A.XSSD1
AND Z1.DEPTID = B1.DEPTID
AND SUBSTR (B1.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
AND Z1.JZRQ = '2012-8-23')
GROUP BY C.BMDM,
C.DEPT_NAME,
A.XSSD1,
A.XSSD2
END OF STMT
PARSE #5:c=0,e=186,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142349795
EXEC #5:c=0,e=128,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142350084
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142350130
WAIT #5: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 394 p1=129 p2=25709 p3=1 obj#=16923 tim=1314660144811060
*** 2012-08-29 11:47:46.104
FETCH #5:c=80317790,e=78455566,p=0,cr=8283188,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220805742
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3424 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809320
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809468
FETCH #5:c=0,e=78,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=2,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220809529
WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 12233 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220821911
=====================
在fetch阶段出现耗费大量CPU等待时间，这是为何？
环境：
OS：
lsb_release -d
Description: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8)
数据库版本：
SQL> select * From v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

bf01</oracle/admin/bfdb/udump>$cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 12
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4270.34
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 32
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.12
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 16
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.11
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 60
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.08
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 4
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 13
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.00
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 5
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 33
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.22
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 6
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 17
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.06
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 7
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 61
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.10
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 8
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 14
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.12
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 9
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 34
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.21
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 10
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 18
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.08
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 11
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 62
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.09
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 12
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 4
core id : 15
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 13
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 8
siblings : 4
core id : 35
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.07
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 14
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 4
siblings : 4
core id : 19
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.13
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 15
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2132.385
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 15
siblings : 4
core id : 63
cpu cores : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4264.11
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Password Manager 4.6 and 4.7 causes CPU loop in tzres.dll

T510 running Windows 7x64. T510 is in a constant CPU loop with WMIPRVSE consuming the CPU as per Process Explorer. Using Microsoft Sysinterals Process Monitor determine that the cause is constant calls to access tzres.dll. Reboot in clean mode and one my one activate services and startup programs until the loop is observed. It is only observed when Password Manager is started. Do an uninstall of 4.7 and the problem goes away. Start with 4.0 of Password Manager. Each release from 4.0 to 4.5 work fine with no loop. Installing 4.6 or 4.7 cause the loop. All Lenovo drivers and programs are current.
Any ideas? Tom

I'm testing a beta version of Password Manager which has solved the issue that I was experiencing.
W520, i7-2820QM, BIOS 1.42, 1920x1080 FHD, 32 GB RAM, 2000M NVIDIA GPU, Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD, Crucial M550 mSata 512GB, WD 2TB USB 3.0, eSata Plextor PX-LB950UE BluRay
W520, i7-2760QM, BIOS 1.42 1920x1080 FHD, 32 GB RAM, 1000M NVIDIA GPU, Crucial M500 480GB mSata SSD, Hitachi 500GB HDD, WD 2TB USB 3.0

(CS4) Photoshop 32Bit + Bridge + Win7 = CPU 100% all the time

This is something that occurred to me many times now:
I need to use the 32Bit-Version of Photoshop because of all the Plugins I use and some of them run ONLY on one of them at a time, like PixelBender ( W H Y ? ? ? )
So: Whenever I have Photoshop 32bits running (because it would default to 64bits where my plugins are not available) and open Bridge afterwards to open a file in PS, Photoshop stays at 100% CPU (on one of the cores) all the time without any reason. I also checked if there were selections active (yes, selections sometimes pretty much need a LOT of CPU power, whyever!)
Otherwise, when I first start Bridge and THEN Photoshop 32Bits, the CPU usage is okay. Something seems using up much CPU power in some kind of endless loop / dead lock or something?!
It's quite annoying, because I don't use Bridge that often. Sometimes I want to start Bridge "on demand". And if I have opened Photoshop already I would have to close down everything just to be able to start Bridge again without losing a full CPU core.
So if anyone has the same issues like me: Just reverse the opening order: First open Bridge, THEN open Photoshop and everything should be fine.

I don't have an answer to your question about the infinite loop, but I can answer this:
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
Ninarama wrote:
I need to use the 32Bit-Version of Photoshop because of all the Plugins I use and some of them run ONLY on one of them at a time, like PixelBender
( W H Y ? ? ? )
A plugin is a special kind of callable function library (Dynamic Link Library, or DLL in Windows speak). A 32 bit DLL cannot be used by a 64 bit version of Photoshop. In order to use the completely different instruction set the processor provides for 64 bit operation, the plugin code must be compiled specifically for 64 bit operation.
All plugins developed before the time of Photoshop CS4 were originally developed as 32 bit applications, because Photoshop was only 32 bit. Even today, 32 bit users outnumber 64 bit users by a large margin.
Microsoft makes it almost trivially easy to compile 32 bit source code as a 64 bit application, BUT... If the programmer hasn't been careful in his use of data types - specifically those that will be a different size (e.g., a pointer will be increased from 32 bits to 64 bits), then doing so - even if the software compiles successfully - might yield a non-functional plugin.
Sadly, many programmers are not careful with their use of data types. This is 30+ years of software engineering talking.
With good design and good coding practices, the code will be good and the programmer will be able to compile a 64 bit plugin quickly. Even bad code can be cleaned up in time, so that it can be made to work in 64 bit form.
But there's even more that must be done...
Most serious software uses an installer.
Installing software on a 64 bit system requires big changes to the installation package, or maybe even a whole new installer. There is, for example, the added complexity that you, the user, might want the proper variant of the plugin installed into each of your 32 bit and 64 bit Photoshop installations. And possibly multiples (e.g., CS4, CS5). Creating a good installer package is somewhat akin to designing a rocket booster. Except that the latter is generally agreed to be easier.
And all this is just on the Windows side! It must be repeated for the Mac, assuming the plugin is marketed into that segment as well.
So... If your favorite plugin doesn't run under Photoshop x64, and the author doesn't have an upgrade available that does, maybe they are struggling to make it work, maybe they decided the x64 user market isn't big enough for their attention right now, or maybe they're just working on something else.
Probably more than you wanted to know, eh?
-Noel

ASE freeze with CPU 100% and IO 0%

Hi,
I have a production ASE server using 30 CPU's that's is "freezing" several times in the last week (requiring an machine reboot) and from the last sysmon taken we see that the first 4 cpu are 100% with IO 0%.
Engine Busy Utilization        CPU Busy   I/O Busy       Idle
    Engine 0                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
    Engine 1                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
    Engine 2                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
    Engine 3                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
    Engine 4                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
    Engine 5                       44.5 %     19.7 %     35.8 %
    Engine 6                       62.4 %     24.7 %     12.9 %
From SysWaits we see that event 29 (waiting for regular buffer read to complete) is high when we experience this problem.
No change was reported and the users and saying the system to be in the overall slower in the last weeks.
The version is the old 12.5.4 with the latest patch available and the OS is HP-UX.The machine has 256Gb of memory.
As anyone experienced a behavior like this?
Thanks

Hi Ricardo
I have seen this when underlying storage changed from raw SAN devices to NAS file system devices.
tempdb writes after a certain amount of volume queued up in a serial way choking the whole server.
This may or may not be what is happening on your server.
Having said that : If this is not something new then what was the last change in your case ?
Especially related to storage
Wait event 29 is related to storage and I/O.
Avinash

CPU 100%

Hey, I've got this weird problem of cpu random spikes to 100% and computer barely reacts.
few facts - opened the laptop clean the fan and make sure it's functional,
the 100% cpu is not always, but when it is the laptop is not under big pressure,
computer overheated a few (around 2-4) times the past month (probably because I blocked the heatsink),
the most interesting one is that, I can't say for sure, but when I unplug the computer from charging it works better, not sure 100% that's the case, didn't leave it for long in that state as the battery drains rather quickly.
Checked cpu stats.. cpu temp is around 50~70 celcius.(check when plugged in, when plugged out it didnt change right away.. no idea if it did eventually)
Appreciate any help

itayu
Welcome to the HP Community Forum.
You know, it could be anything -- and there are so many, many posts about this...
Grab a search word and search a bit for your favorite.
One of my favorites and one that I have not posted for a while:
You might be plagued with the Indexing service going nuts in the background.
If poorly configured, this service can indeed eat up resources and make you think your computer is processed by gremlins.
Pull open the Task Manager and check to see what is running -- see if the Indexing service is running like crazy in the background.
You can change the parameters on the Index to control when it runs, what it checks, how many folders it runs against.
Change advanced indexing options
Improve Windows searches using the index: frequently asked questions
Click the Kudos Thumbs-Up to say Thank You!
And...Click Accept as Solution when my Answer provides a Fix or Workaround!
I am pleased to provide assistance on behalf of HP. I do not work for HP.
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur

Oracle.exe and java.exe are running my CPU 100% under XP Prof SP3

11gR1
oracle.exe and java.exe are running 100% CPU
I have increased virtual memory to 4 gig
I have defragmented the drive.
I checked the drive for errors.
I am searching the whole drive for viruses
I do not have the problem with Redhat Fedora 12 running 11gR1
I have 1 gig of RAM but cannot install release 2 because the installer expects
1 gig + 1

ooops!!! left that off...sorry
XP Prof SP3 32 bit..*.no problem with Redhat Fedora 12 running MySQL and 11gR1*
1 gig RAM Dell precision W/S 1.5 Gig rate 74 GiG SCSI HD 15000 RPM
Don't pass out but I am also running MySQL server 5.1.41 and MS SQL Server Express 2008.
Lucky it didn't catch fire
I installed XP prof months ago but this CPU domination occurred only starting last night!
However slow everything works in 11gR1
sqlplus myname/password and then select rows from table
sqldeveloper
PHP web sites
I've had plenty of trouble with Java running slow and hogging memory!
Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:21 PM
Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:24 PM
Let me guess...stop services for MySQL and MS SQL Server and see what happens!
Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:26 PM

WinRM load CPU 100%

I have 9 Domain Controllers 2012 (not R2) and one DC 2008R2 in one Domain. Damain has 5 sites. There are some trusted domains. All DCs are VirtualMachines on VmWare. Damain and Forest tevel - 2008R2.
All 2012 DCs have the same problem. WinRM load CPU on 100% and DC doesn't answer on requests, ping works, RDP try connecting but can't sign-in. The problem appear randomly (not simultaneously) on all DCs. DC 2008R2 works good.
I dasabled WinRM on all DCs and users can works but I need WinRM.
Thanks!

Hi,
Here is an article below about how to troubleshoot
high CPU usage on a Domain Controller:
Troubleshooting High CPU Usage on a Domain Controller
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727054.aspx
If there are many client computers connecting to the DC when the issue occurs, please apply this hotfix below:
High CPU usage on a Windows Server 2012-based server when many client computers connect to the server
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2830448
In addition, here is a thread below which has a similar issue, please follow Elad’s reply to see if it works for you:
SVCHOST - DNS Client High CPU Utilization
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/d2a2ad2d-a406-410c-9b7a-e22104fd2e2e/svchost-dns-client-high-cpu-utilization?forum=itprovistanetworking
Best Regards,
Amy

CPU 100%, network traffic light

My setup:
Xserve G4, 2 Gb RAM
OSX Server 10.4.11
In recent days, the server CPU is maxed out as shown by the graphs in Server Admin. Our network traffic is fairly light as shown by the graph.
I run:
top -o cpu
Processes: 71 total, 7 running, 64 sleeping... 197 threads 08:35:30
Load Avg: 7.69, 6.83, 6.10 CPU usage: 82.6% user, 17.4% sys, 0.0% idle
SharedLibs: num = 134, resident = 22.1M code, 3.04M data, 6.75M LinkEdit
MemRegions: num = 9369, resident = 270M + 6.72M private, 44.1M shared
PhysMem: 113M wired, 141M active, 824M inactive, 1.05G used, 711M free
VM: 4.36G + 85.0M 26950(0) pageins, 0(0) pageouts
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
15923 httpd 19.2% 0:01.98 1 12 249 6.91M+ 19.5M 11.7M+ 72.4M+
15867 httpd 18.0% 0:05.45 1 12 275 14.0M+ 19.4M 18.8M+ 79.4M+
15926 httpd 17.5% 0:01.57 1 12 247 6.38M+ 19.5M 11.0M+ 71.9M+
15922 httpd 17.4% 0:02.01 1 12 257 9.51M+ 19.5M 14.3M+ 74.9M+
15870 httpd 9.9% 0:13.47 1 12 275 13.8M+ 19.5M 18.7M+ 79.1M+
15917 top 7.6% 0:05.40 1 26 22 1.17M 448K 1.59M 27.0M
15871 httpd 7.4% 0:13.82 1 12 274 13.8M+ 19.5M 18.8M+ 79.1M+
269 mysqld 1.5% 2:47:51 29 150 134 29.6M- 5.48M 33.3M- 132M-
0 kernel_tas 0.4% 5:11.65 43 2 2532 19.4M 0K 96.5M 1.11G
106 lookupd 0.1% 1:27.48 6 44 53 4.23M+ 1020K 4.98M+ 33.6M+
102 SecurityAg 0.1% 1:34.08 1 69 99 1.76M 7.10M 8.66M 116M
48 memberd 0.0% 1:20.43 3 22 24 268K 412K 628K 27.7M
15650 sshd 0.0% 0:00.42 1 11 42 108K 1.62M 496K 30.0M
38 netinfod 0.0% 0:21.80 1 14 22 208K 524K 572K 26.9M
63 WindowServ 0.0% 0:14.16 2 67 56 588K 4.97M 5.02M 92.2M
52 notifyd 0.0% 0:10.16 2 79 21 204K 416K 468K 27.2M
120 ntpd 0.0% 0:04.63 1 11 19 192K 608K 412K 27.1M
298 httpd 0.0% 0:06.42 1 10 229 104K 19.5M 7.00M 79.8M
272 serialnumb 0.0% 0:00.96 3 27 32 308K 800K 1.08M 28.3M
15921 httpd 0.0% 0:01.17 1 12 277 14.3M 19.5M 18.6M 79.9M
15920 httpd 0.0% 0:01.19 1 13 277 14.3M 19.5M 18.7M 79.9M
15919 httpd 0.0% 0:01.23 1 12 274 13.8M 19.5M 18.3M 79.2M
15918 httpd 0.0% 0:01.44 1 13 229 1.66M 19.5M 6.32M 67.1M
15900 httpd 0.0% 0:06.63 1 12 277 14.4M 19.5M 19.2M 79.9M
15881 trivial-re 0.0% 0:00.01 1 16 19 200K 512K 760K 26.7M
15869 httpd 0.0% 0:11.61 1 12 275 13.9M 19.5M 18.6M 79.4M
15868 httpd 0.0% 0:09.79 1 12 274 13.8M 19.5M 18.9M 79.1M
15852 servermgrd 0.0% 0:01.47 4 61 169 4.30M 3.86M 7.28M 46.4M
15824 pickup 0.0% 0:00.01 1 16 20 204K 500K 700K 26.7M
15651 bash 0.0% 0:00.04 1 14 17 200K 896K 820K 27.2M
15643 sshd 0.0% 0:00.12 1 18 43 128K 1.62M 1.36M 30.1M
348 slpd 0.0% 0:00.40 6 31 34 260K 908K 968K 30.2M
305 httpd 0.0% 66:38.29 1 13 237 3.14M 19.4M 9.52M 68.3M
304 httpd 0.0% 66:09.95 1 13 278 15.1M 19.4M 21.0M 80.3M
303 httpd 0.0% 68:59.73 1 13 234 3.17M 19.4M 9.29M 68.3M
302 httpd 0.0% 66:02.83 1 13 281 15.3M 19.4M 20.8M 80.0M
301 httpd 0.0% 68:12.51 1 13 281 15.6M 19.4M 21.4M 81.0M
300 rotatelogs 0.0% 0:00.02 1 14 18 136K 380K 360K 26.6M
299 rotatelogs 0.0% 0:04.57 1 14 18 140K 380K 364K 26.6M
285 mds 0.0% 0:00.05 6 71 46 556K 1.37M 1.88M 40.8M
217 sh 0.0% 0:00.04 1 14 18 188K 812K 720K 27.2M
207 getty 0.0% 0:00.00 1 14 18 112K 388K 332K 26.6M
164 crashrepor 0.0% 0:00.00 1 17 18 120K 384K 200K 26.6M
150 automount 0.0% 0:00.02 3 40 30 312K 932K 1.05M 28.7M
146 automount 0.0% 0:00.03 3 42 34 312K 968K 1.09M 29.0M
143 rpc.lockd 0.0% 0:00.00 1 10 18 108K 432K 192K 26.7M
134 nfsiod 0.0% 0:00.00 5 30 25 128K 376K 180K 28.6M
101 authorizat 0.0% 0:00.05 1 31 27 368K 940K 1.21M 27.4M
98 mcxd 0.0% 0:02.21 1 41 39 608K 1.26M 2.23M 69.1M
95 loginwindo 0.0% 0:00.25 3 101 90 904K 2.04M 3.25M 102M
Not sure where to start diagnosing this issu

Camelot,
Thanks again for your response!
Camelot wrote:
You shouldn't need to do that - what happens when you try?
Safari can't connect to the server "localhost".
The only thing I can think of off-hand that would cause this is if mod_status was disabled (which you might have done thinking you didn't need it). It would be a good idea to re-enable this, even if only short-term, to get an idea of what's going on.
mod_status is not listed in Web > Modules
Not sure if it will help significantly but I did enable the query cache for MySQL.
The query cache will generally help reduce load on the database server, but only if there's sufficient RAM on the server to cache the queries and results. The real question is how mush RAM is your system using? If it's out of memory then enabling the query cache can be detrimental.
For that matter, do your sites seem slow? Is your only concern the relatively high CPU load? or are pages loading slowly, too?
The pages are taking exceptionally long to load.
The 1.7 Gb Ram...Yes, it's a config of 512-512-512-256.
Swapping that 256MB for a 512MB seems like a no-brainer, no matter what else you do. It'll cost you $20 from OWC.
You're right...no brainer. Will do
Was wondering if a permissions issue could create the problems I'm having with Apache?
Unlikely. If apache didn't have permission to serve a file it would throw an error page back pretty quickly. I can't see this is the cause, but a quick look at apache's error log will tell you if there are any permission issues.
The site was running well this morning but as bloggers logged into Wordpress and general traffic picked up, the CPU load ramped up to 100% and pages are now loading very slowly.

Performance problem !! CPU 100% !!

Hi all,
Whe have an Weblogic application accessing Oracle Database 10gR2.
We are having a high CPU Usage sometimes 100% for a long time (1 hour or more).
The query that is consuming more CPU run in 2 seconds. I have 40 simultaneous connections on this database. How can i solve this??
I'm using MTS connections, not dedicated connections.
Tks,
Paulo.

Hi Paulo,
Hope you are doing well, and hopt to see you next spring aon the Oracle Cruise . . .
high CPU Usage sometimes 100% for a long time (1 hour or more).Remember, all virtual memory servers are designed to drive CPU to 100%. See my notes here:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_high_cpu.htm
You only have CPU enqueues when there are more tasks waiting for CPU, than you have CPU's.
As to MTS and high CPU consumption, I have some notes here:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_mts_multithreaded_servers_shared.htm
Keating also notes cases where using the multithreaded server (MTS can cause a degradation in performance:
I encountered one situation in which a database server’s CPUs were constantly pegged at 100% usage, and the CPU queue length (the number of processes waiting for CPU time) was typically 6 or 7 during peak periods. That database had been using MTS for several years, even though there was more than enough physical memory on the system to support dedicated connections.
Hope this helps. . .
Donald K. Burleson
Oracle Press author

CPU 100% seeing HPMSN083.DLL (runapp.dll)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for