CPU 100%

Hey, I've got this weird problem of cpu random spikes to 100% and computer barely reacts.
few facts - opened the laptop clean the fan and make sure it's functional,
the 100% cpu is not always, but when it is the laptop is not under big pressure,
computer overheated a few (around 2-4) times the past month (probably because I blocked the heatsink),
the most interesting one is that, I can't say for sure, but when I unplug the computer from charging it works better, not sure 100% that's the case, didn't leave it for long in that state as the battery drains rather quickly.
Checked cpu stats.. cpu temp is around 50~70 celcius.(check when plugged in, when plugged out it didnt change right away.. no idea if it did eventually)
Appreciate any help

itayu
Welcome to the HP Community Forum.
You know, it could be anything -- and there are so many, many posts about this...
Grab a search word and search a bit for your favorite.
One of my favorites and one that I have not posted for a while:
You might be plagued with the Indexing service going nuts in the background.
If poorly configured, this service can indeed eat up resources and make you think your computer is processed by gremlins.
Pull open the Task Manager and check to see what is running -- see if the Indexing service is running like crazy in the background. 
You can change the parameters on the Index to control when it runs, what it checks, how many folders it runs against.
Change advanced indexing options
Improve Windows searches using the index: frequently asked questions
Click the Kudos Thumbs-Up to say Thank You!
And...Click Accept as Solution when my Answer provides a Fix or Workaround!
I am pleased to provide assistance on behalf of HP. I do not work for HP. 
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur

Similar Messages

  • CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft iMac

    Hi There!
    As the title says, "CPU 100% When Playing Minecraft". Every time I boot up Minecraft the Fan becomes loud. I have another iMac (Late 2013) Model and it runs Minecraft fine with all the same settings. So I don't really no what to do. But if you could help me try to get the CPU usage down or maybe turn the fan down? Or something like that that would be great!!
    My iMac Specs.
    Mac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014)
    Processor: 4 GHz Intel Core i7
    Memory: 32 GB 1600 MHz DDR3
    Graphics: AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4096 MB
    So Yeah, if you could give me a hand, I would be so much appreciated!
    Thanks!

    Firefox 3.6.6 Windows XP - often goes to 80-100% CPU even with only one tab open (in this case the one I'm writing this message on). When this happens the only cure is to kill it with task manager and start again.

  • Sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent mac air os 10.8.2 cpu 100%

    sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent (mac air 4,2   2011 mid)  os 10.8.2 cpu 100%  ? why..?

    sony mw600 a2dp avrcpagent (mac air 4,2   2011 mid)  os 10.8.2 cpu 100%  ? why..?

  • G580(20150) CPU 100%

    При добавлении или уменьшении гровкости, а так же яркости экрана с помощью кнорки Fn +нужная стрелочка вылазит сообщение. В заголовке написано "Energy Managment", сообщение внутри окна"CPU 100%" и кнопка "OK". Посмотрев по диспетчеру задач процессор не загружается на 100 процентов, а просто выскакивает окно. Которое мешает постоянно. Как исправить? Спасибо заранее за ответ.

    Приветствую
    Никаких других идей, кроме удаления и переустановки драйвера Lenovo Energy Management лично у меня нет. Вы не назвали ОС, для win8.1, например, есть два разных релиза, для разных платформ ноутов. Для 20150:
    http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/products/laptops-and-netbooks/lenovo-g-series-laptops/lenovo-g580-notebook/20150/downloads/DS037135

  • Lenovo S10-1 CPU 100%

    Hello
    I have S10-2 with Windows 7 Home edition. Problem is when I have open 2 or three windows explorer and maybe 2 google chrome windows CPU goes to 100%. Is there some controller problem or something else. Same problem if I copy some files from USB removable disk to my local disk and open internet explorer. Again CPU 100%
    Thanks for answers
    Marko

    Hi and welcome...
    agreed ... depends on memory, energyprofile, and usage of background tasks (there are a few  
    Quote "" Same problem if I copy some files from USB removable disk to my local disk""
    ...  USB to HDD transfer is indeed a huge process for our Intel N270/945 combo ...
    where a C2D have enough power ... our N270/945 comes to sweat ... if you get him more tasks, while usb transfer to hdd, so give them a bit time  
    ..  its a netbook not a subnote or note  .... some times we forgot this..
    because all other things is nearly managed with same performance with this small device ...  
    sincerely KalvinKlein
    Thinkies 2x X200s/X301 8GB 256GB SSD @ Win 7 64
    Ideas Centre A520 ,Yoga 2 256GB SSD,Yoga 2 tablet @ Win 8.1

  • 一条SQL占用CPU 100%

    一个查询语句执行时占用单核CPU资源100%,请帮忙分析原因。
    SQL及执行计划如下:
    *** 2012-08-29 11:46:25.764
    WAIT #9: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 16994971 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142349078
    STAT #7 id=1 cnt=3 pid=0 pos=1 obj=0 op='HASH GROUP BY (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=75576024 us)'
    STAT #7 id=2 cnt=3 pid=1 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8283188 pr=0 pw=0 time=22207347 us)'
    STAT #7 id=3 cnt=20138 pid=2 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=58213 pr=0 pw=0 time=503569 us)'
    STAT #7 id=4 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=1 obj=16923 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=17935 pr=0 pw=0 time=161196 us)'
    STAT #7 id=5 cnt=20138 pid=4 pos=1 obj=16925 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ_SP (cr=205 pr=0 pw=0 time=20201 us)'
    STAT #7 id=6 cnt=20138 pid=3 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=40278 pr=0 pw=0 time=263247 us)'
    STAT #7 id=7 cnt=20138 pid=6 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=20140 pr=0 pw=0 time=130059 us)'
    STAT #7 id=8 cnt=3 pid=2 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=8224975 pr=0 pw=0 time=75131469 us)'
    STAT #7 id=9 cnt=3 pid=8 pos=1 obj=16309 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN BM_BMDM (cr=8224972 pr=0 pw=0 time=75063047 us)'
    STAT #7 id=10 cnt=12084 pid=9 pos=1 obj=0 op='NESTED LOOPS (cr=8204832 pr=0 pw=0 time=74863852 us)'
    STAT #7 id=11 cnt=3452523 pid=10 pos=1 obj=16924 op='INDEX RANGE SCAN PK_REAL_XS_BMSDHZ (cr=1287698 pr=0 pw=0 time=34756285 us)'
    STAT #7 id=12 cnt=12084 pid=10 pos=2 obj=16307 op='TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BM (cr=6917134 pr=0 pw=0 time=36180549 us)'
    STAT #7 id=13 cnt=3452523 pid=12 pos=1 obj=16308 op='INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_BM (cr=3464611 pr=0 pw=0 time=17895710 us)'
    =====================
    PARSING IN CURSOR #5 len=985 dep=0 uid=36 oct=3 lid=36 tim=1314660142349798 hv=3549420567 ad='fb568520'
    SELECT C.BMDM,
    C.DEPT_NAME,
    A.XSSD1,
    A.XSSD2,
    0 XSJE,
    0 XSBS,
    0 YHJE,
    0 XSJE_BHQ,
    SUM (A.XSJE) OLD_XSJE,
    SUM (A.YHJE) OLD_YHJE,
    SUM (A.XSJE - A.YHJE) OLD_XSJE_BHQ,
    SUM (A.XSBS) OLD_XSBS,
    0 COMPARE,
    0 KDJ,
    0 OLD_KDJ,
    0 KDJ_BHQ,
    0 OLD_KDJ_BHQ
    FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ A, BM B, BM C
    WHERE A.DEPTID = B.DEPTID
    AND SUBSTR (B.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
    AND A.JZRQ = '2012-8-22'
    AND NOT EXISTS
    (SELECT 1
    FROM REAL_XS_BMSDHZ Z1, BM B1
    WHERE Z1.XSSD1 = A.XSSD1
    AND Z1.DEPTID = B1.DEPTID
    AND SUBSTR (B1.BMDM, 1, 4) = C.BMDM
    AND Z1.JZRQ = '2012-8-23')
    GROUP BY C.BMDM,
    C.DEPT_NAME,
    A.XSSD1,
    A.XSSD2
    END OF STMT
    PARSE #5:c=0,e=186,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142349795
    EXEC #5:c=0,e=128,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660142350084
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660142350130
    WAIT #5: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 394 p1=129 p2=25709 p3=1 obj#=16923 tim=1314660144811060
    *** 2012-08-29 11:47:46.104
    FETCH #5:c=80317790,e=78455566,p=0,cr=8283188,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220805742
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3424 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809320
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220809468
    FETCH #5:c=0,e=78,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=2,dep=0,og=1,tim=1314660220809529
    WAIT #5: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 12233 driver id=1413697536 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=16923 tim=1314660220821911
    =====================
    在fetch阶段出现耗费大量CPU等待时间，这是为何？
    环境：
    OS：
    lsb_release -d
    Description: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8)
    数据库版本：
    SQL> select * From v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

    bf01</oracle/admin/bfdb/udump>$cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 12
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4270.34
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 1
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 32
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.12
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 2
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 16
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.11
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 3
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 60
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.08
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 4
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 13
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.00
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 5
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 33
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.22
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 6
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 17
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.06
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 7
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 61
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.10
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 8
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 14
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.12
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 9
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 34
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.21
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 10
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 18
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.08
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 11
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 62
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.09
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 12
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 3
    siblings : 4
    core id : 15
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.01
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 13
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 8
    siblings : 4
    core id : 35
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.07
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 14
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 4
    siblings : 4
    core id : 19
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.13
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:
    processor : 15
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7320 @ 2.13GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2132.385
    cache size : 2048 KB
    physical id : 15
    siblings : 4
    core id : 63
    cpu cores : 4
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
    bogomips : 4264.11
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

  • [GNOME 3.4] gnome-shell overview search + gnome-documents - CPU 100%

    Hello
    When I type something in the gnome shell overview my CPU goes to 100% for a few seconds even after I left the overview.
    The process which is taking my CPU is : gjs-console
    With gnome 3.4 you can search for documents via the gnome shell overview, this search is based on gnome-documents. So I tried dis-installing gnome-documents and the problem was solved.
    I don't know if it's a bug... but if the gjs-console really is the documents overview search process, it's strange that it doesn't stop when I leave this overview.
    What do you think ? Should I report it as a bug ? Arch bug / upstream bug ?
    PS : By the way, the gnome-shell extension "tracker-search" is faster and, I think, better for finding documents via the overview.

    This behaviour is the same in my box but I don't think it's an arch bug but an upstream issue (its not a bug formally speaking)... maybe it should be reported to the gnome-documents team in order they do more polish to it.
    Best,

  • Slow throughput Ironport S370 Proxy CPU 100%

    We have a cluster of 3 x Ironport S370's all running 7.7.0-753
    The throughput is really poor we have a 500Mbps Internet connection which at it's peak is only getting to 120Mbps as the Ironports don't seem to be able to handle the traffic.
    The Proxy CPU% is always close to 100% but the overall CPU is usually at no more than 30% at times it can take up to 60 seconds to load the initial page particularly if the site is an HTTPS site.
    We have
    22 Identities
    62 Access policies
    6 decryption Policies
    Our maintainer says that having this number of Identities / policies should not be an issue but I have my doubts.
    Can anyone advise as it's really become a major issue, Output from the rate and status commands are below.
     %proxy  reqs                         client    server    %bw  disk  disk
         CPU  /sec   hits blocks misses    kb/sec    kb/sec  saved   wrs   rds
     99.00   285    373   1293   1193     26484     21838   17.5   550   100
     99.00   286    209   1313   1335     28682     24532   14.5   635    80
     99.00   285    182   1323   1359     37083     33529    9.6  1351     0
    100.00   231    132   1051   1113     34816     34151    1.9   355     0
     98.00   253    161   1171   1195     39668     37236    6.1  1363     0
     99.00   294    256   1225   1469     51371     43304   15.7  1117    40
     96.00   346    525   1166   1763     31882     23300   26.9  1328     0
     98.00   302    228   1258   1534     30385     25565   15.9  1302     0
     99.00   295    149   1200   1597     26253     22888   12.8   816     0
     98.00   275    199   1020   1536     35237     31443   10.8   838     0
     99.00   288    184   1131   1574     35019     26688   23.8  1433     0
     99.00   262    116   1073   1437     24744     23228    6.1  1306     0
    105.00   307    292   1165   1610     24249     20236   16.6  1061     0
    Status as of:                  Thu Oct 16 08:28:10 2014 GMT
    Up since:                      Wed Oct 15 15:21:19 2014 GMT (17h 6m 51s)
    System Resource Utilization:
      CPU                                    28.2%
      RAM                                    82.6%
      Reporting/Logging Disk                 16.0%
    Transactions per Second:
      Average in last minute                   266
      Maximum in last hour                     296
      Average in last hour                     118
      Maximum since proxy restart              296
      Average since proxy restart                9
    Bandwidth (Mbps):
      Average in last minute                25.461
      Maximum in last hour                  49.605
      Average in last hour                  16.400
      Maximum since proxy restart           49.605
      Average since proxy restart            1.365
    Response Time (ms):
      Average in last minute                   179
      Maximum in last hour                     526
      Average in last hour                     192
      Maximum since proxy restart            17710
      Average since proxy restart             3165
    Cache Hit Rate:
      Average in last minute                    16
      Maximum in last hour                      25
      Average in last hour                       7
      Maximum since proxy restart               25
      Average since proxy restart                0
    Connections:
      Idle client connections                 1276
      Idle server connections                 1170
      Total client connections                1638
      Total server connections                1890

    In the release notes it states...
    IMPORTANT: During testing of AsyncOS 7.7.0, Cisco observed performance changes ranging from + 
    33% to - 16%, depending on the model and configuration. Performance degradation risk is limited to 
    S160 & S360 models and models S370 and S660 that are running the web proxy without security 
    services. If you experience performance degradation with AsyncOS 7.7.0, Cisco recommends that you 
    revert to AsyncOS 7.5.x. 
    http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/wsa/wsa7-7/Release_Notes/WSA_7-7-0_Builds_after_725_Release_Notes.pdf

  • [linux] 9.0.115.0 causes CPU 100% with firefox

    The 9.0.115.0 version of FlashPlayer causes 80-100% CPU
    consumption with latest Firefox on linux.
    The only solution I found, I get back to the 48... Can you
    fix it? Can you help me?

    I have the same problem with 9.0.115.0 in Linux.
    I have posted a bug-report to Adobe support last week - no
    reaction yet.
    Good site for testing is:
    http://www.lanik.us/misc/ff-flash-test.html

  • Pages 5.1 Fluctuates between 0.6% CPU & 100% CPU

    I have only used Pages a few times.  I recently got iWork when I upgraded to Mavericks.  I designed a template that looks exactly like a college ruled notebook so I can visualize ruled pages. 
    There are about 36 objects, which are a set of GROUPED & LOCKED horizontal blue lines and one vertical red line and are not obstructed or moved by text. 
    Now when I begin to write or type on the page after I've saved as template, I can usually get about 5 words or so in before I get that spinning pinwheel / beach ball.  The spinning lasts about 2 minutes.
    At this time, I open the Activity Monitor and watch what occurs.  The % CPU goes from 0.6 - 100% when this occurs.  It also says in the Process name that the application is (Not Responding) while it spins. 
    I am not sure if this is an autosave thing that is occurring or not.  I have saved a file directly on the Desktop as well as iCloud, and it seems that this occurs in both forms of working on Pages. 
    I have done simple procedures like quit app, restart / shutdown computer, etc to no avail.  I would like to continue to use Pages, but this is completely not acceptable.
    Any suggestions?
    Cheers,
    jeff

    Thanks, mate, thought that might be an issue, but didn't want to believe that was the case.
    How does one spend any time at all working in Pages if they truly used what it is designed for - adding objects / images, etc. - without feeling like they've timewarped back to 133mHz computers?
    It is bizarre, because I set the object as static objects and not to be manipulated by the text.  Is it still doing a calculation even though they are fixed vector lines?  I would think that the LOCKED option eliminates that factor and sees it sort of as a flattened object in the background, no?
    It's truly painful.  I can type on my iPhone with much less issues.

  • ITunes 10.5 has three processes that hog CPU 100%

    Since I updated iTunes to 10.5, there are three proceses that hog the CPU to 100% and everything comes to a screaching slow mode. These are APSDaemon.exe, MDCrashReportTool.exe, and AppleMobileDeviceSerivce.exe. Even when I close iTunes, these processes keep running and continue to hog the CPU.
    I am running Window XP on an IBM (Lenovo) Thinkpad T60 machine with 2GB Ram and T2500CPU @ 2.00GHz.
    What are these processing doing that takes so much CPU poawer. Before iTunes and iPad updates, they use to function properly.

    When I called Apple Support to ask about the 100%  CPU usage, they wanted to charge me because my Ipod was out of warranty.  I insisted on talking to someone and finally got to talk to a software engineer for free.  He said that he had never heard of the problem in his three years at Apple.  Nonetheless, he sounded really interested and suggested that it might be a conflict with anti-virus software.   I deleted the antiviruse and that DID NOT HELP AT ALL.
    It seems as if Apple could care less.    There is no official response.   Their primary response is to look at the Forum.   At least you find out that the problem isn't your fault, it really is Apple!!!!
    So far the best solution is just to delete iTunes and use Mediamonkey to sync your pod.
    Apple, please fix this!!!!!

  • ASE freeze with CPU 100% and IO 0%

    Hi,
    I have a production ASE server using 30 CPU's that's is "freezing" several times in the last week (requiring an machine reboot) and from the last sysmon taken we see that the first 4 cpu are 100% with IO 0%.
      Engine Busy Utilization        CPU Busy   I/O Busy       Idle                
        Engine 0                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 1                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 2                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 3                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %             
        Engine 4                      100.0 %      0.0 %      0.0 %
        Engine 5                       44.5 %     19.7 %     35.8 %             
        Engine 6                       62.4 %     24.7 %     12.9 %             
    From SysWaits we see that event 29 (waiting for regular buffer read to complete) is high when we experience this problem.
    No change was reported and the users and saying the system to be in the overall slower in the last weeks.
    The version is the old 12.5.4 with the latest patch available and the OS is HP-UX.The machine has 256Gb of memory.
    As anyone experienced a behavior like this?
    Thanks

    Hi Ricardo
    I have seen this when underlying storage changed from raw SAN devices to NAS file system devices.
    tempdb writes after a certain amount of volume queued up in a serial way choking the whole server.
    This may or may not be what is happening on your server.
    Having said that : If this is not something new  then what was the last change in your case ?
    Especially related to storage
    Wait event 29 is related to storage and  I/O.
    Avinash

  • Oracle.exe and java.exe are running my CPU 100% under XP Prof SP3

    11gR1
    oracle.exe and java.exe are running 100% CPU
    I have increased virtual memory to 4 gig
    I have defragmented the drive.
    I checked the drive for errors.
    I am searching the whole drive for viruses
    I do not have the problem with Redhat Fedora 12 running 11gR1
    I have 1 gig of RAM but cannot install release 2 because the installer expects
    1 gig + 1

    ooops!!! left that off...sorry
    XP Prof SP3 32 bit..*.no problem with Redhat Fedora 12 running MySQL and 11gR1*
    1 gig RAM Dell precision W/S 1.5 Gig rate 74 GiG SCSI HD 15000 RPM
    Don't pass out but I am also running MySQL server 5.1.41 and MS SQL Server Express 2008.
    Lucky it didn't catch fire
    I installed XP prof months ago but this CPU domination occurred only starting last night!
    However slow everything works in 11gR1
    sqlplus myname/password and then select rows from table
    sqldeveloper
    PHP web sites
    I've had plenty of trouble with Java running slow and hogging memory!
    Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:21 PM
    Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:24 PM
    Let me guess...stop services for MySQL and MS SQL Server and see what happens!
    Edited by: landonmkelsey on May 2, 2010 12:26 PM

  • WinRM load CPU 100%

    I have 9 Domain Controllers 2012 (not R2) and one DC 2008R2 in one Domain. Damain has 5 sites. There are some trusted domains. All DCs are VirtualMachines on VmWare. Damain and Forest tevel - 2008R2. 
    All 2012 DCs have the same problem. WinRM load CPU on 100% and DC doesn't answer on requests, ping works, RDP try connecting but can't sign-in. The problem appear randomly (not simultaneously) on all DCs. DC 2008R2 works good.
    I dasabled WinRM on all DCs and users can works but I need WinRM.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Here is an article below about how to troubleshoot
    high CPU usage on a Domain Controller:
    Troubleshooting High CPU Usage on a Domain Controller
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727054.aspx
    If there are many client computers connecting to the DC when the issue occurs, please apply this hotfix below:
    High CPU usage on a Windows Server 2012-based server when many client computers connect to the server
    http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2830448
    In addition, here is a thread below which has a similar issue, please follow Elad’s reply to see if it works for you:
    SVCHOST - DNS Client High CPU Utilization
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/d2a2ad2d-a406-410c-9b7a-e22104fd2e2e/svchost-dns-client-high-cpu-utilization?forum=itprovistanetworking
    Best Regards,
    Amy

  • CPU 100%, network traffic light

    My setup:
    Xserve G4, 2 Gb RAM
    OSX Server 10.4.11
    In recent days, the server CPU is maxed out as shown by the graphs in Server Admin. Our network traffic is fairly light as shown by the graph.
    I run:
    top -o cpu
    Processes: 71 total, 7 running, 64 sleeping... 197 threads 08:35:30
    Load Avg: 7.69, 6.83, 6.10 CPU usage: 82.6% user, 17.4% sys, 0.0% idle
    SharedLibs: num = 134, resident = 22.1M code, 3.04M data, 6.75M LinkEdit
    MemRegions: num = 9369, resident = 270M + 6.72M private, 44.1M shared
    PhysMem: 113M wired, 141M active, 824M inactive, 1.05G used, 711M free
    VM: 4.36G + 85.0M 26950(0) pageins, 0(0) pageouts
    PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
    15923 httpd 19.2% 0:01.98 1 12 249 6.91M+ 19.5M 11.7M+ 72.4M+
    15867 httpd 18.0% 0:05.45 1 12 275 14.0M+ 19.4M 18.8M+ 79.4M+
    15926 httpd 17.5% 0:01.57 1 12 247 6.38M+ 19.5M 11.0M+ 71.9M+
    15922 httpd 17.4% 0:02.01 1 12 257 9.51M+ 19.5M 14.3M+ 74.9M+
    15870 httpd 9.9% 0:13.47 1 12 275 13.8M+ 19.5M 18.7M+ 79.1M+
    15917 top 7.6% 0:05.40 1 26 22 1.17M 448K 1.59M 27.0M
    15871 httpd 7.4% 0:13.82 1 12 274 13.8M+ 19.5M 18.8M+ 79.1M+
    269 mysqld 1.5% 2:47:51 29 150 134 29.6M- 5.48M 33.3M- 132M-
    0 kernel_tas 0.4% 5:11.65 43 2 2532 19.4M 0K 96.5M 1.11G
    106 lookupd 0.1% 1:27.48 6 44 53 4.23M+ 1020K 4.98M+ 33.6M+
    102 SecurityAg 0.1% 1:34.08 1 69 99 1.76M 7.10M 8.66M 116M
    48 memberd 0.0% 1:20.43 3 22 24 268K 412K 628K 27.7M
    15650 sshd 0.0% 0:00.42 1 11 42 108K 1.62M 496K 30.0M
    38 netinfod 0.0% 0:21.80 1 14 22 208K 524K 572K 26.9M
    63 WindowServ 0.0% 0:14.16 2 67 56 588K 4.97M 5.02M 92.2M
    52 notifyd 0.0% 0:10.16 2 79 21 204K 416K 468K 27.2M
    120 ntpd 0.0% 0:04.63 1 11 19 192K 608K 412K 27.1M
    298 httpd 0.0% 0:06.42 1 10 229 104K 19.5M 7.00M 79.8M
    272 serialnumb 0.0% 0:00.96 3 27 32 308K 800K 1.08M 28.3M
    15921 httpd 0.0% 0:01.17 1 12 277 14.3M 19.5M 18.6M 79.9M
    15920 httpd 0.0% 0:01.19 1 13 277 14.3M 19.5M 18.7M 79.9M
    15919 httpd 0.0% 0:01.23 1 12 274 13.8M 19.5M 18.3M 79.2M
    15918 httpd 0.0% 0:01.44 1 13 229 1.66M 19.5M 6.32M 67.1M
    15900 httpd 0.0% 0:06.63 1 12 277 14.4M 19.5M 19.2M 79.9M
    15881 trivial-re 0.0% 0:00.01 1 16 19 200K 512K 760K 26.7M
    15869 httpd 0.0% 0:11.61 1 12 275 13.9M 19.5M 18.6M 79.4M
    15868 httpd 0.0% 0:09.79 1 12 274 13.8M 19.5M 18.9M 79.1M
    15852 servermgrd 0.0% 0:01.47 4 61 169 4.30M 3.86M 7.28M 46.4M
    15824 pickup 0.0% 0:00.01 1 16 20 204K 500K 700K 26.7M
    15651 bash 0.0% 0:00.04 1 14 17 200K 896K 820K 27.2M
    15643 sshd 0.0% 0:00.12 1 18 43 128K 1.62M 1.36M 30.1M
    348 slpd 0.0% 0:00.40 6 31 34 260K 908K 968K 30.2M
    305 httpd 0.0% 66:38.29 1 13 237 3.14M 19.4M 9.52M 68.3M
    304 httpd 0.0% 66:09.95 1 13 278 15.1M 19.4M 21.0M 80.3M
    303 httpd 0.0% 68:59.73 1 13 234 3.17M 19.4M 9.29M 68.3M
    302 httpd 0.0% 66:02.83 1 13 281 15.3M 19.4M 20.8M 80.0M
    301 httpd 0.0% 68:12.51 1 13 281 15.6M 19.4M 21.4M 81.0M
    300 rotatelogs 0.0% 0:00.02 1 14 18 136K 380K 360K 26.6M
    299 rotatelogs 0.0% 0:04.57 1 14 18 140K 380K 364K 26.6M
    285 mds 0.0% 0:00.05 6 71 46 556K 1.37M 1.88M 40.8M
    217 sh 0.0% 0:00.04 1 14 18 188K 812K 720K 27.2M
    207 getty 0.0% 0:00.00 1 14 18 112K 388K 332K 26.6M
    164 crashrepor 0.0% 0:00.00 1 17 18 120K 384K 200K 26.6M
    150 automount 0.0% 0:00.02 3 40 30 312K 932K 1.05M 28.7M
    146 automount 0.0% 0:00.03 3 42 34 312K 968K 1.09M 29.0M
    143 rpc.lockd 0.0% 0:00.00 1 10 18 108K 432K 192K 26.7M
    134 nfsiod 0.0% 0:00.00 5 30 25 128K 376K 180K 28.6M
    101 authorizat 0.0% 0:00.05 1 31 27 368K 940K 1.21M 27.4M
    98 mcxd 0.0% 0:02.21 1 41 39 608K 1.26M 2.23M 69.1M
    95 loginwindo 0.0% 0:00.25 3 101 90 904K 2.04M 3.25M 102M
    Not sure where to start diagnosing this issu

    Camelot,
    Thanks again for your response!
    Camelot wrote:
    You shouldn't need to do that - what happens when you try?
    Safari can't connect to the server "localhost".
    The only thing I can think of off-hand that would cause this is if mod_status was disabled (which you might have done thinking you didn't need it). It would be a good idea to re-enable this, even if only short-term, to get an idea of what's going on.
    mod_status is not listed in Web > Modules
    Not sure if it will help significantly but I did enable the query cache for MySQL.
    The query cache will generally help reduce load on the database server, but only if there's sufficient RAM on the server to cache the queries and results. The real question is how mush RAM is your system using? If it's out of memory then enabling the query cache can be detrimental.
    For that matter, do your sites seem slow? Is your only concern the relatively high CPU load? or are pages loading slowly, too?
    The pages are taking exceptionally long to load.
    The 1.7 Gb Ram...Yes, it's a config of 512-512-512-256.
    Swapping that 256MB for a 512MB seems like a no-brainer, no matter what else you do. It'll cost you $20 from OWC.
    You're right...no brainer. Will do
    Was wondering if a permissions issue could create the problems I'm having with Apache?
    Unlikely. If apache didn't have permission to serve a file it would throw an error page back pretty quickly. I can't see this is the cause, but a quick look at apache's error log will tell you if there are any permission issues.
    The site was running well this morning but as bloggers logged into Wordpress and general traffic picked up, the CPU load ramped up to 100% and pages are now loading very slowly.

Maybe you are looking for