CPU clock speed for 2645 and 2646 series

I looked for the clock speeds of the CPUs for 2645 and 2646 series at the IBM website but could not find them. Is there a pdf file which contains the above info, or a way to look for the clock speed for a given p/n? Could anyone help?

Visit this page:
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/homeLenovo.do?country=us
Input the 7-character model number and watch the history unfold...
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
George
In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
Collecting dust: T60
Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

Similar Messages

Adjust CPU clock speed for saving Power

Does anyone know which software is the best for adjusting the cpu clock speed in Mac book pro? I want to decrease to half of the original speed in MBP so that I can save power when I'm on the battery.
Thanks

well I do understand what you mean but then I would like to have a software to control the clock speed like I control my fan speed although the default setting does that automatically. I don't really want to use it without a battery because apple does not recommend that also.
Thank you

How to change CPU clock speed for conserving power?

Hi, I own a compaq CQ60 404CA and I am wondering how I can change the settings for minimal cpu speeds.
I know it automatically sets it's speed down to half when not being used. I want to decrease that even further.
Is that possible?
I tried Nvidia system tools, but it gives a wrong reading regarding the CPU speeds (2.8ghz when its actually 1.05ghz)
Thanks
I've tried:
1. Changing CPU power settings down to 1%, and even then it stayed at half speed
2. Checked Bios, but didn't find settings

Yes it is possible, try steps in amd forum guide, here
Pavilion DV2922TX, XP-SP3 32bit, Intel T5750 2.0Ghz, Nvidia Geforce 8400M GS with 128MB, 4GB 667 DDR2, 250GB HDD

CPU Clock speed with Belle Update

The original symbian^3 devices run on the ARM 11 Processor which has been optimized to function close to 1GHz. But they're currently running at a speed of 680 MHz. My request to Nokia is that please optimize our processor speed to atleast 1GHz with the upcoming belle update. If you haven't planned on doing it, please do it with a minor update atleast after you release belle. I'm not an expert on this. So suggestion and comments are welcome.
blitZkid
Nokia C7: Running on Nokia Belle
"If I'm helpful in anyway, a click of appreciation on the star would be nice"

bumblebirra wrote:
I would be surprised if the rest of the hardware in the phone, like the RAM etc, couldn't support the maximum CPU clock speed. When such sophisticated electronic devices are designed it's impossible to know until it's all been put together how it will actually perform as a complete unit - the hardware, software, battery capacity, etc. The clock speed allows a fine-tuning once everything comes together, to get the optimal balance.
Well-made software makes a huge difference to how much CPU/hardware resources are required. Software efficiency is the most important factor of all.
A GPU is only there to perform tasks that would otherwise take up huge amounts of CPU resources. Dedicated graphical tasks such as 2D scrolling, 3D texture-mapping/filling for example. But that's all. The CPU is still running the whole show, but just has much of the load taken off it by the GPU.
So with the GPU doing more and more, the CPU and it's speed become less relevant.
A few things here, some of what you have mentioned I agree with. But some I dont. Firstly when any device is designed, things like the GPU and RAM are all allowed for, that is the speed at which each is capable. There is no use taking pot luck saying oh we think that will be enough. Its all calculated right from the word go.
Its done for several reasons, firstly costings, there is no use producing something that is so expensive no will be able to afford it. secondly to make sure you dont end up with bottle necks in data flow. Also it no use producing something that is so slow that you cant do anything worthwhile on it. That is some of the reasons.
You are absolutely right about software, well made software installed in a relatively slow running device can quite often beat poorly designed software running on a fast machine at exactly the same task. O/S like windows for instance, in my opinion only, whilst full of features, is definitely bloated, and not well designed. A standard install disc for windows these days is around the 3Gig mark (depending on version of OS), where as something that does exactly the same thing like Linux still fits on a 700M cd.
And you are right about the GPU, its does relieve the pressure on the cpu. Unfortunately the gpu in an N8 or an E7 is only running at 200Mhz. Considering most things are graphical based on these phones. I would have to wonder how much of the gpu is being used, especially when the one chip is running everything from the 2d/3d graphics/rendering, the camera up to 12MP, HDMI, HD video recording and play back, a stack of video codecs etc.
Unfortunately the main cpu from everything i was able to find is simply listed as an ARM11, these processors run on several Nokia's phone, including the older E90 (which had dual cpu's but ran at much slower speed of about 332 Mhz., however the Arm site list the ARM 11 as several versions, including one that actually has 4 cpu on the one the chip but only presents itself as 1 cpu to the rest of the hardware, with this cpu running anywhere up to 1Ghz. So its entirely possible that the 680Mhz listed for the N8/E7 could be as fast as it goes. Also the current versionof the ARM11 have a power consumption of 0.21mW/Mhz. so based on that figure a processor running at 680Mhz would consume 142.8 mW, but at 1G it would be 210mW, that a difference of 67.2mW. That would mean your phone would go flat a lot quicker. This info is based solely on information that I can find on Nokia run sites, ARM's site and broadcoms site. That way we can beleive what we are able to read with some certainty. I did find other non-related site suggesting 720mhz for the cpu, but they are only a 3rd party mobile news site, that said it had been suggested that it was capable of 720Mhz..
But i do firmly believe with efficient code the phones can perform extremely well, Anna certainly seems faster than the old Symbian ^3 version that was on the phone prior to Anna, whether or not Belle can be made any more efficient remains to be seen. But heres hoping.

Does CPU clock speed(ghz) affect gaming quality?

Hey guys,
i was just wondering if CPU speed really matter when you play games. I am only going to play fifa, which isn't as graphic intense as other PC games.
Anyways, last year's MacBook Air had 1.7ghz as its processor, and i heard that it ran fifa 13 just fine.
However, this year's processor is only 1.3ghz, which is a lot lower than what i expected....however, according to real tests, the actual laptop speed increased about 5%. It was very surprising to me, but i guess it was cuz of the new gpu.
So, my question is, does CPU clock speed really affect gaming quality? Or if the actual speed increased 5%, does it not matter?
Thanks in advance!

You need to take into account the # cores when considering processing power. Computers run many processes at once. A duel core processor clocked at 1.7 GHz is not necessarily better than a quad core processor clocked at 1.3 GHz. The best analogy is driving. A two lane road with a the speed limit of 170 MPH. A four lane road with a speed limit of 130 MPH. When there is no traffic, you will arrive at your destination faster taking the first route. But when there is a bunch of traffic, you will be stuck in a bumper to bumper jam. Even though the speed limit is higher on the two lane road, you will arrive at your destination faster taking the four lane road. There are more lanes available to maintain the flow of traffic.
There is always traffic. Your computer runs many processes in the background, and individual games run multiple processes at once. Processing power is a combination of both the speed limit and the number of lanes.
And yes, the GPU should always be taken into account. It is a Graphics Processing Unit. Rendering graphics on your screen correctly is very important in regards to gaming. A discrete GPU is preferable to an a single integrated one, always, for gaming.

CPU Clock speeds

This is a simple one for you guys today.
I have noticed on these forums that most clock speeds are at least 133. My BIOS is showing
Current CPU clock 1250
CPU FSB clock 100
I am no master of the darker regions of the BIOS but should I be running a bit faster looking at my set up below?

Cheers Guys
Both jumpers J10 and J11 were set to 133/166 already. I think it must have defaulted at sometime. I installed SP2 the other day, don't know if that effected it
I changed the set up to manual and changed to 1:1, (the ratio was set to 'By SPD').
Happy days

CPU Clocking speed is under advertised?

I bought this laptop at Best Buy a little over a month ago and I just realized that the clocking speed is 600 MHz under what the advertised speed was and you guys have advanced settings whitelisted(which I completely don't agree with, it'd be my own risk anyways as you can tell if the settings were altered) so how am I supposed to get it to what was advertised? Is there any way of getting in the advanced settings?

Hi,
Have you read:
http://www.amd.com/en-us/innovations/software-technologies/turbo-core
"AMD Turbo Core technology dynamically adjusts to give you a performance boost just when the operating system requests the highest processor performance. If a core is operating below maximum limits and your workload demands additional performance, the processor frequency will dynamically increase until the upper limit of frequency is reached. As your workload subsides, the core returns to normal frequency. This gives you optimized application performance within the thermal and power limits of your APU."
Your machine:
http://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c04445368
Hope this helps.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

How do I set-up my memory amount for max speed for FCP and Motion

Hey all, I have a Dual 2.3 G5 with (8 Gigs) Ram. I'm working with a new client. I want to set up my memory or whatever else to provide MAXIMUM processing power for FCP and MOTION. Does anyone have any recommended settings. I've maxed-our RAM. My card is (ATI Radeon 9600-128MB of VRAM)
Is there a setting in FCP that allows more processing power to be applied to that application ?
Appreciate any replies

Most of FCP's speed in performing functions is directly related to processor speed. The only way to increase performance would be to use a Mac with faster processors. Performance is also related to data throughput, so if you're working with high data rate video formats, a fast RAID and/or SATA (or eSATA) media storage solution would help.
The exception to FCP performance is when rendering/processing FX Plugs; they are dependent on the power of the graphics card.
Motion is mostly dependent on the power of the graphics card.
There is no way that I'm aware of that you can speed up RAM. Having the extra RAM will just mean that you can successfully work with more applications open at the same time.
-DH

Dual Core Center displaying wrong CPU clock speed

Hi,
I've got the 965 Platinum board and I have overclocked my E6300 Allendale to 2.331ghz (from 1.86ghz). My problem is that the MSI Dual Core Center is showing my CPU as being clocked at 2.997mhz. It seems to think that, because I've upped the FSB to 333mhz, I must have a CPU with a multiplier of 9 instead of the 7 of the E6300.
If Dual Core Center is not reading the CPU clock correctly how can I trust that it's reading the temperature right (which is really the only reason Ihave it loaded at all). I know the CPU is only set at 2.331 because the BIOS gets it right, System Properties gets it right and Intel's Thermal Analysis Tool gets it right. It's only the Dual Core Center that gets it wrong.

Make sure you are using the newest version of DCC.
Other than that, DCC might not be the best tool to monitor your system.
Quote
how can I trust that it's reading the temperature right (which is really the only reason Ihave it loaded at all).
To monitor core tempertatures use Coretemp: http://www.thecoolest.zerobrains.com/CoreTemp/
A very good program to monitor all kinds of stuff ist everst 3.5.

CPU clocking 100% for Master Scheduler

Hi
Most of the time my Master scheduler is clocking 100% CPU. There are 6 process schedulers. 2 are dedicated process scheduler(not defined as online app servres in Configuration.properties file on Webserver) where as 4 are process scheduler as well as online app servers. Problem is that all those users who are connected to Master scheduler server are experiencing Performance issue. Other 3 online servers are not so engaged as CPU utilisation for them is between 6% - 20% only.
My question is is this set is adviceable ? or making one of the dedicated process scheduler as Master scheduler will help?
My hardware configuration of all appservers is 2 x 2.4 Intel Xenon HT and 3GB Ram.
Regards
Vishal Mahajan

Hi Marchiom
Thanks for your reply. Following were the processes that are running on Master Scheduler at time when it clocked 100%.
pspubdsp.exe
psqrysrv.exe
jsh.exe (20 different instances)
pssamsrv.exe
psappsrv.exe (350K x 2 instances)
Not sure which one was keeping CPU occupied? I'll keep an eye again and see which one is picking most CPU%.
Regards
Vishal Mahajan

Download speed for videos and high quality videos

Hi everyone...!!! I've just ran the speedtest app on both my I pad and I pod touch and the results are the same. Download is 1.72 Mbps and upload is 0.57 Mbps. I'm guessing that this is pretty poor and is the reason a HD video on you tube takes ages to load and freezes after the film is started?? Work pays for my broadband but I would gladly pay for my own if that would enable me to get a faster connection and better downloading speeds??? Is this the case??? Thanks in advance for any guidance on this matter.......cheers. Scott.

I presume u r on 3g at those figures. My ADSL on iPad is 12 mps down and around 0.8 up BUT like others here streaming is still slow, as is browsing. I have tried everything here and I do mean everything. It's been 6 weeks now since 4.2.1 was 'let loose' and personally I've had enough. My analogy is I bought a 'car' to commute on a highway at 110kph and after its first service it now does 40kph and the service dpt wont return my calls for help. I have tried servicing it my self, changed oil, rotated tyres etc all of which were vain attempts, heck I've even BLAMED THE BOWSER the fuel comes out of.
Well if my iPad was a car I know what I would be doing. Take it back and have it replaced???? not when I know the same model has the same issue. If it were a car I would be saying "mate I'll walk to work till the new model comes out". I know this is a rant but I have had enough. I will include my latest service attempt tip and perhaps this post wont be deleted.
The following tip helped somewhat .... I am now up to 48kph.
Set router to Wireless G only.  Set Router to WPA2 only. (make sure you dont have any old devices) (WPA2 is the most secure, and uses AES encyrption which has no overhead or slow down on your data) Set router to Manual channel selection, then pick channel 6, I actually found 3 slightly better, see if it helps, if not go back and select channel 11, if not then put it back on automatic. Go to router toolbox and then turn off Extended security which is found in UpNp settings  Also try turning browsing interception off (its normally in the configuration page).
cheers

External hard drive speed for backups and archiving

I'm planning to buy a pair of external FireWire hard drives to backup and archive my iBook G4. I've read a couple of product reports that compare read and write speed of hard drives which seems to be a function of each drive's rotational speed.
I then noticed that my iBook's internal hard drive is slower (at 4200 RPM) than either of the external drives I'm now considering (7200 RPM and 5400 RPM). A test report I read showed the 7200 RPM drive duplicating 1GB twice as fast as the 5400 RPM drive when connected via FireWire to a G5.
Will my slower internal hard drive limit the speed of duplication so that there is little or no advantage to the 7200 RPM drive over the 5400 RPM drive for me?
iBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Probably should have been clearer in my initial question. The 7200 RPM drive I'm looking at is a desktop model, and a bit cheaper than the 5400 RPM drive, which is portable. I like the smaller footprint of the portable drive (and the convenience of it being bus powered) but don't want to pay more for those benefits only to be disappointed with its performance.
So, I'm actually trying to decide between a higher speed/lower cost/desktop vs. lower speed/higher cost/portable. If I could determine that the actual performance difference between these was not very significant when used solely to backup and archive my iBook, I'd gladly pay a bit more for the convenience and small size of the portable.
If there indeed is a big performance difference, I'd find space on my desk for the desktop drive and pocket the savings.

Recommended Burning Speed for CDs and DVDs??

I am burning some recordings I have to a CD. What is the best speed to select when burning CD's for best sound and voice quality? How about DVD's also? The default preferred speed in Mac OSX is Maximum Possible. The other options are 1x, 2x, 4x, 6x, 8x, 12x, 16x, 20x, 24x.

For burning audio CDs, I suggest 4x at the max. Using a too-high speed will often cause a static or "whooshing" sound on playback.

Difference in terms of speed for SP and Query text.

Hi,
I have an SSRS report developed using Query type text select statement while there is an existing report with the same query and it was made in stored procedure. The query i used in my SSRS was came from the the existing report that use stored
procedure and i put it in a query type text. Upon running the report it takes time to generate while the one using stored proc it takes only a minutes to generate the data. May i know twhat is the difference between the two in terms of speed and functionality.
Thank you

Hi Visakh,
Actually I cannot modify the stored procedure that's why i copy the query inside and then i modify based on the requirement given by user instead of replicating the query again. By the way, I dont have any access or permission to modify the proc. I'll try
to check the execution plan. thanks.
It may be the case that when SP is called, it finds the execution plan from procedure cache so SQL Server re-use it. However for your query there is no best plan in cache and it may take even longer to execute if you have ad-hoc queries or dynamic SQL.
Also please refer:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e7c2a6c8-b23f-4b16-b840-112e96c48cc4/ssrs-report-is-consuming-much-more-time-to-fetch-data-from-db-even-direct-run-sp-takes-less-than-a?forum=sqlreportingservices
-Vaibhav Chaudhari

5800XM CPU clock speed

My Handset is Nokia 5800 XpressMusic. Software Version 21.0.025. "X-plore v1.35" shows that my CPU speed is only 192MHz (X-plore/Menu/Tools/Device info). FExplorer also shows the SAME. But Nokia and other mobile sites (gsmarena) tell that 5800XM's CPU speed is 369MHz/434MHz! Which one is correct? Please help me by providing CORRECT INFORMATION. Thanks in advance.

X-Plore and similar tools have trouble identifying the CPUs on more recent devices. It was 369MHz when it was first released, but a software update brought it up to 434MHz (the rated speed of the chip).
Help I'm trapped in a sig factory.

CPU clock speed for 2645 and 2646 series

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for