Cpu jan 2010 patch for windows

Hi All,
can i know the patch number for cpu jan 2010 patch set number for windows.
kk

It depends on your version of Windows (2000,2003,2008, 32bit, 64bit, itanium, etc).
Your best bet is to view the My Oracle Support note for the Jan 2010 CPU (ID 986632.1) to find the correct patch number.

Similar Messages

  • CPU patch for windows

    Hi ,
    Is the oracle CPU patchs released separately for windows platform (like how they release it for UNIX flavours ).... or is it only Bundle patches for windows . I did some metalink search and google search and my understaing is there is no CPU patches for windows ... we may need to use only Bundle patches for windows platfrom . If so , does Bundle patch include CPU patches ?

    Hi;
    You need to check below link and you need to find patch number from notes and you need to check patch from metalink. If the patch is not avaliable for Windows platform than you need to rise SR and get patch from support
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html
    Regard
    Helios

  • Apply CPU JAN 2012 Patches in R12.1.1

    What are the steps in appling CPU JAn 2012 patches in R12.1.1 ?
    Regards.

    Hi;
    What are the steps in appling CPU JAn 2012 patches in R12.1.1 ? It depends which CPU patches wanna apply. For some of our client we are just appliying database patches. For some other they also want to some other patches which is for Oracle Fusion Middleware products.
    Mainly for ALL patches, You need to check README part of patch. For each patch those steps are different also their prereq and post installation steps.
    So you question answer is check readme part for patches
    PS:Please dont forget to change thread status to answered if it possible when u belive your thread has been answered, it pretend to lose time of other forums user while they are searching open question which is not answered,thanks for understanding
    Regard
    Helios

  • How to download macbook pro (mid 2010) drivers for windows 7, without the included DVD (lost) ?

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing a problem with bootcamp on my Macbook pro 15" (Mid 2010, running Mos OS 10.6.6).
    I have successfully installed windows 7 via Bootcamp, but I lost the Drivers DVD furnished by Apple.
    I tried to download these using Bootcamp (v3.0.4), but bootcamp won't let me save it, i get this error :
    "the windows support software could not be saved to the selected folder"
    An Apple support article has been made for this problem ( http://support.apple.com/kb/TS3648 ), but it doesn't solve the problem in my case because I lost the furnished DVD.
    So here I am, struck on this drivers issue...
    So, my question is :
    How to download macbook pro (mid 2010) drivers for windows 7, without the included DVD (lost) ?
    Thank you for your help !
    Regards

    Aw, and I forgot, being in Thailand, they do not sell the installation DVD.

  • Security Update 2007-001 patch for Windows

    Hi, I am having no luck in finding the Security Update 2007-001 for Quicktime security patch for Windows XP.
    Can someone please direct me to either the link to directly download the Windows version of the 2007-001 security patch, or a link to the Software Update tool in order to download this patch.

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304989
    If Software Update was not installed during your QuickTime Player install you'll need to uninstall it, re-install and include Software Update software.
    Is that enough install?

  • Difficulty installing Rescue and Recovery 4.2 patch for Windows Vista

    Which between System Update Installation History and Post-Installation Status Report should I believe, when they tell a different story?
    When I run thinkVantage System Update, the post-intallation status report indicates that the following fails to install:
    * Rescue and Recovery 4.2 patch for Windows Vista
    * ThinkVantage Client Security Solution for Vista SP1
    * Lenovo Wireless WAN Activation Patch
    However, when I open the ThinkVantage System Update History Log, I read that the above updates have been installed.
    Which one should I believe?
    I'm willing to believe that the update has been installed, but whenever I run System Update, I keep getting the same message that the above three need to be installed.
    Should I keep ignoring the message? If not, what else could I try?
    I have a T60 running Vista with SP1 installed. 

    Hi privard,
    Thanks for your feedback. Anyhow, let me see how i could help to sort this out for you.
    Cleo 
    WW Social Media
    T61, T410, x240, Z500, Flex 14
    Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
    How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.
    English Community   Deutsche Community   Comunidad en Español   Русскоязычное Сообщество

  • Can somebody helpme apply Oracle Olap 9.2.0.1.0.a patch for Windows

    Everything on the system is a fresh installation.
    1.Oracle 9iR2 Database, I chose the data warehousing option.
    After installation I checked to make sure that everything could be started.
    2. I then proceeded to install the Oracle OLAP patch 9.2.0.1.0a patch for windows.After navigating to the 2499827 directory.
    I typed OPatch\opatch apply as stated.
    It started then said "Peforming Pre patch installation checks"
    At the end of this
    I recieved a message saying
    "The following required components were not located or have the wrong versions
    oracle.options.olap"
    I guess it was to right to assume that the patch process failed, particularly as don't see any olap\admin directory in my %ORACLE_HOME%. The olap directory is there.
    Can somebody please give me some pointers. Is there something I have missed with regards to setting up Oracle 9iR2 thats preventing me from patching it.
    Thank you
    Richard Smith

    If you are missing the admin directory under your olap directory your initial Oracle9i Database Release 2 installation appears to be the culprit. Again, be sure to install the Enterprise Edition with the Data Warehouse database configuration. Also, make sure your Global Database Name and SID are all set up and running fine. Perhaps you installed over a previous ORACLE_HOME? Be sure to follow these steps for a proper Oracle removal:
    1. Terminate the Oracle9i Database and its processes
    Go to the Services applet in Control Panel and Stop all running Oracle processes
    2. Run OUI to uninstall your previous version of Oracle9i with OLAP Option, then Exit
    Choose 'Deinstall Products...'
    Select the products you need to remove, then click 'Remove...'
    Then click 'Exit' when done
    3. For a clean installation remove the following directories and registry entries (if they still exist):
    Directories:
    <your_drive>:\oracle\ora92
    <your_drive>:\oracle\oradata
    <your_drive>:\oracle\admin
    <your_drive>:\Program Files\Oracle
    Registry Entries:
    [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\ORACLE]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\ORACLE]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92Agent]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92ClientCache]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92HTTPServer]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92PagingServer]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92SNMPPeerEncapsulator]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92SNMPPeerMasterAgent]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleOraHome92TNSListener]
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\OracleServiceMY_SID]

  • Oracle CPU Jan 2012 Patch

    Hi:
    EBS: 12.1.3
    DB: 11.1.0.7.0
    APPS: 10.1.2.3, 10.1.3.4
    I need to apply CPU Jan 2012 patch. May I ask what Jave SE version supports that?
    Thank you and regards.
    Edited by: 907485 on Apr 9, 2012 1:13 PM

    Hi;
    Please check patch read me part. All related information cover in it
    Regard
    Helios

  • Current Patches for Windows (32bit) 9.2.0.8

    We have recently upgraded to Windows 32-bit Oracle 9.2.0.8.  Note 539921  lists the patchset for Windows 32-bit as follows:
    NT_I386 32-bit
    /Oracle/Oracle 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0. 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0.8. 32-bit/
    NT_I386/Patchset_9208_WINNT.zip
    The patch set is installed with the runInstaller - see README.html
    For more information about installing patch sets, see Note 578683.
    *In addition, use opatch to install patch 12 for 9.2.0.8.
    /Oracle/Oracle 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0. 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0.8. 32-bit/
    NT_I386/9208_Patch12_WINNT.zip*
    So, after an upgrade to Windows 32-bit 9.2.0.8 you should then immediately apply patch 12?  The problem is reading note 1107601 - CPU Patches October 2007 (Oracle Critical Update Program)
    states the following:
    *The CPU patches are not a patch set, but rather a collection of patches. If
    there is a critical problem, you may have to install a separate fix, which
    conflicts with the CPU patch. In this case, you must uninstall the CPU
    patch.*
    But there is nothing specific for 9.2.0.8 (it implies there are no conflicts for 9.2.0.8):
    For Oracle 9.2.0.7, note the following:
    Unfortunately, the CPU patches for Oracle 9.2.0.7 conflict with patches
    that have already been installed and that are important for an SAP system.
    Therefore, there will be no further release of the patches for Oracle
    9.2.0.7. *We therefore recommend that you upgrade the database to Oracle
    9.2.0.8 and use the CPU patches for Oracle 9.2.0.8 instead.*
    So I'm assuming that after installing patchset 9.2.0.8 for Windows 32-bit I should apply patch 12 (which is CPU October 2007).  There are some patches listed under "Oracle Other" that seem to be generic patches listed under the download section for oracle 9.2.0.8.  Do these patches cause a conflict with patch 12?  I haven't seen a note that says to install them.
    I haven't found a note that says to install anything other than patchset 9.2.0.8 and then patch 12.  Is this right?  I need to find out pretty quick so any help  is appreciated!

    Hi,
    do following as of note 539921
    first apply patch set 9.2.0.8
    /Oracle/Oracle 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0. 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0.8. 32-bit/
                                            NT_I386/Patchset_9208_WINNT.zip
    than apply cpupatch CPUOct2007 patch 12 for  9.2.0.8  if you found critical problem with CPU it's optional
    use opatch to install patch 12 for 9.2.0.8.
         /Oracle/Oracle 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0. 32-Bit/Oracle 9.2.0.8. 32-bit/
                                              NT_I386/9208_Patch12_WINNT.zip
    regards,
    kaushal

  • How much RAM & CPU should I allocate for Windows 7 Ultimate?

    I am in the process of setting up my new 27" iMac i7. I'm brand new to Apple computers so this is a learning curve for me! I have installed Parallels Desktop 5 so I can run Windows 7 side by side with Snow Leopard. Now I am trying to install Windows 7 Ultimate but I don't know how much RAM and CPU to allocate to my virtual machine. Has anyone done this and can anyone help? I have 8 gb RAM and 1 tb Hard Drive.
    Thank you for your help!

    Hello SwissCanuck,
    Just FYI, with regard to 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 7:
    You will not be able to "upgrade" from a 32-bit version of Windows 7 to 64-bit -- the architecture between the two is too drastically different to allow such a change. To learn more about the differences between a 32-bit operating system and 64-bit please go to the following link: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/32-bit-and-64-bit-Windows-frequ ently-asked-questions
    Additionally, check out the requirements here for Windows 7:
    If you want to run Windows 7 on your PC, here's what it requires:
    •1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor
    •1 gigabyte (GB) RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)
    •16 GB available hard disk space (32-bit) or 20 GB (64-bit)
    •DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver
    Obviously covered as per your hardware. Essentially, it is always better if you run Windows 7 as a "Native OS" you can do this with boot camp from Apple. Typically, the performance is not as fast in virtual environments
    John M
    Microsoft Windows Client Team

  • 10.2.0.4 CPU Jan 2011 missing for HP-UX on itanium

    Hallo All,
    Is there a reason why the HP-UX CPUJAN2011 for database 10.2.0.4 is missing in the patchlist (patch 10249540)?
    (we noticed that ALL patches for HP are missing.... something going on between HP and Oracle?)
    Best regards,
    Jan.
    Edited by: JanH on 19-jan-2011 2:35
    Edited by: JanH on 19-jan-2011 4:53

    Waiting is over:
    Patch 10249540 has been released by development a couple of minutes ago.

  • October CPU and PSU patches for oracle Database and application

    Hi experts,
    Linux-X86_64
    Datbase - 11.2.0.3.0
    Application - 12.1.3
    Can any one provide Patch Number for Cpu and Psu patch numbers for above versions(Oct 2014).
    regards,
    prathap

    You can also refer MOS note:
    Patch Set Update and Critical Patch Update October 2014 Availability Document (Doc ID 1912224.1)
    thanks

  • Photoshop elements 7 and the patch for windows 7

    I have installed the patch on my hp laptop for windows 7 but photoshop elements 7 does not function properly and close the program.  any suggestions?

    Hlm1 do you receive a specific error message?  Did the program ever work?  If so what changes have you made?  What are you doing within Photoshop Elements when you receive the error message?
    If your software is able to open successfully then I would recommend posting your inquiring in our Photoshop Elements forum.

  • SAProuter.sar patch for windows x86 32bit

    Hi friends,
    I am unable to find SAPRouter.sar patch (Release Kernal 700) for windows x86 32bit. And also tel me the steps for config at system level, as I have done all the req steps at service market.
    Does SAPRouter to be connected in the internal network?
    While creating RFC connnection to SAPOSS I am geting an error.
    If anyone have an idea reg SAPRouter, just msg it.
    Regards,
    nagesh

    Hi Andrews,
    I have seen tht path but I am unable to view for win 32 bit. These are for different OS found in the SAPRouter link.
    SAPROUTER 7.00
    AIX 32bit
    AIX 64bit
    HP-UX on IA64 64bit
    HP-UX on PA-RISC 32bit
    HP-UX on PA-RISC 64bit
    Linux on IA32 32bit
    Linux on IA64 64bit
    Linux on Power 64bit
    Linux on x86_64 64bit
    Linux on zSeries 64bit
    OS/400
    OS/400 V5R2M0
    Solaris on SPARC 32bit
    Solaris on SPARC 64bit
    Solaris on x64_64 64bit
    TRU64 64bit
    Windows Server on IA32 32bit
    Windows Server on IA64 64bit
    Windows Server on x64 64bit
    z/OS 32bit
    z/OS 64bit
    I will be thankful if u send me a message reg this.
    Regards,
    Nageshwar

  • High CPU & Memory issues - Excessive and unnecessary CPU usage in Firefox for Windows (see also questions1003966 & 998289)

    I am using the latest version of Firefox, 32.0.1, on an HP Pavilion dv7-4141sa laptop computer, running Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit. There should be more than enough power here to run a browser without any problem, yet the computer is regularly being overloaded by the browser's resource usage.
    I am currently measuring typical average CPU usage of 45% - with the browser minimised. That is to say, Firefox is not doing any browser jobs - it is not drawing on the screen - but it is using the most CPU of any process currently running. Why?
    I am an ex-software engineer, and my understanding of current application development technology is limited, but I think I can say with some confidence that many techniques and software architectures exist that enable the suspension of program activity, or at least its reduction to a very low bare minimum, when the program is not actually carrying out its design function, which is in this case to draw pictures of website data on a screen.
    There is a very serious problem here, one which means that I cannot run Firefox all the time, but have to kill it when I am not actively browsing, otherwise other applications cannot run to their full capacity. This is a great pity, because I have committed a lot of effort to making Firefox my primary web tool. It manages all my many bookmarks, contains my secure password manager (LastPass), manages my web security (via NoScript, AdBlock, and FlashBlock), just for a start.
    Before any well-meaning moderators or other commenters start down the usual trail of "have you done this, tried that, disabled the other", I should point out that I have followed all the advice I can find, with no positive outcome. This computer is running a fresh installation of Windows, and a fresh installation of Firefox. At the moment I am running a new test Firefox profile.
    The latest version of Adobe Flash, 14.0.0.179, is installed but disabled. When it is enabled and in use, Firefox's CPU usage seems high over longer periods, but overall there is little difference. It doesn't look as though the problem can be laid at Flash's door. A few other add-ins are installed, mainly those mentioned above, and Firefox is skinned with LavaFox v2-Green, but I have previously started from a clean installation, which has made little difference after an initial period during which things seemed to be better. Turning off or disabling various add-ons has made no discernible difference.
    Just now I turned Flash on, and after a long period with Firefox minimised, Resource Monitor reported Firefox at 8% average CPU and FlashPlayerPlugin at 0.32%. While running a small video, RM reports FlashPlayerPlugin at about 45% and Firefox at 8%. After the video, Flash went back down to around 0.4%, and after a bit more browsing Firefox went to around 17% minimised. There seems little rhyme or reason here, except that Flash does not seem to be the culprit, although Firefox does seem to consume less when fewer tabs are actually active, as you might expect. I just refreshed more than a dozen tabs, and now Firefox is at 30%, but still not back up to the higher figures. Weird.
    The CPU usage does vary a lot around the average, but 30% is still a lot for a program that shouldn't be doing anything above the minimum status maintenance, and still puts it at the top of my Top Process Monitor list. (Right now it's gone back up to 45%, without my using it in any way).
    I have Telemetry turned on, so presumably Mozilla is recording some of the relevant data.
    This is a very serious fault, which is more or less reproducible and which a lot of people seem to be experiencing. Probably more people have it than realise, because most users will not know anything other than that their computer slows down for some non-obvious reason; they may just think it's something to do with the computer itself, not knowing how to use the Resource Monitor and interpret the results.
    Oddly, the problem does not seem to occur when running Firefox under Linux Mint 17, where the response is snappy and the CPU usage ostensibly low; I am going to look at this in more detail shortly.
    I am not posting here for advice, but for information and as a form of bug report which hopefully other users will see. It will hopefully spare them a lot of effort and time in trying a lot of recommended "solutions" which will not work. The problem is inherent in the software, and can be solved only by Mozilla.
    I am willing to supply any diagnostic data requested; as I said above, I have also turned on "Telemetry". However, I will not be trying out any more reinstallation/new-profile/add-on disable-enable-delete cycles unless I am asked to for very specific reasons. Please do not suggest courses of action which have already been mentioned elsewhere on this forum. I have tried them all.
    The situation is very disappointing, but I have confidence that the Firefox developers will pin down the fault eventually and engineer a satisfactory solution that makes it viable to leave Firefox open all the time. Even with that restriction, it's still far better than the alternatives.

    I share jmward's frustration. This is not a bug report so much as a request for a badly needed feature, ie the ability to have Firefox be able to tell us which tabs on which windows are eating time so we can target them. There are some very poorly written web pages out there which just plain loop while making no updates or inconsequential updates on the page.
    This is not a OS problem; jmward runs Windows and I run Linux but we have the same issue. It is not a question of Firefox plugins or extensions, or even viruses; I have a new, clean Linux install but have the same problem on both my regular Firefox AND on a FRESH install of the latest Firefox (35.0.1) which has *NO* non-default plugins or extensions.
    Here is an example of a web page which will eat 100% of one CPU's time:
    http://patch.com/massachusetts/arlington/arlington-woman-allegedly-attacks-neighbor-snow-blower-0
    I will attach 3 images to back up my claim. All of the images show my dark blue system monitor (gkrellm) superimposed on the web page. The top graph shows CPU time. I have 4 CPUs in my machine, so 25% means the web page is eating 100% of one CPU equivalent.
    The first image shows the load of the offending page with elevated CPU usage along with the download net activity on eth0, but the CPU activity does not stop when the download activity is over.
    The second images show the steady state 100% CPU equivalent of this page just sitting there apparently doing nothing. It IS, however, doing at least two different things. I know from my regular Firefox where I have "Remove It Permanently" installed that if I remove the the little weather indicator in the upper right of the offending page that CPU utilization drops to about 40% of one CPU equivalent. If I use RIP to remove everything else right down to a bare screen that 40% utilization stays until I delete the tab.
    The third image shows the CPU utilization drop to zero when I delete the tab holding the offending page.
    Now I will add a note here: If the offending page is NOT the top tab in a window then it stops eating time. The offender will also stop eating time if I minimize the window. However if I have another window up but leave the offender up on top in its window it continues to eat time even tho I am looking at another window. The offender will continue to eat time even if its window is completely covered by another window, and it will also eat time if I switch to another desktop.
    I will often have half a dozen windows open, and there are many pages out there which will suck endless CPU time. Unless I want to open up a new tab on each window before I leave it there is likely to be some tab on top eating time uselessly. Get a couple of those going and Firefox becomes sluggish and can even stop responding for many seconds.
    I guess I not only want to have Firefox tell us which tabs are eating time, but I would also like it if Firefox would stop giving CPU time to any tab which is not visible because it is covered by some other window and/or it is on a desktop which is currently not showing. If you can stop a tab's CPU usage by reason of tab-not-showing then you should also be able to stop its CPU usage when the window is covered or on the not-top desktop. Indeed is there any reason to not schedule absolute CPU utilization priority to the visible tab on the window with focus and give time to the other tabs only when the visible tab isn't using time?
    My final thought on this is that I have had Firefox SO tied up sometimes that I swear their are web pages which are eating time even tho they are not the top tab. I regret that I do not have an example to show you. But Firefox grinds to a complete halt on a regular basis, and that is not acceptable. I am a programmer with long experience in multi-threaded programs so I *know* there is no reason you cannot do better. If there were another browser around which had the commitment to privacy which Firefox has I would probably switch out of shear annoyance. :-(

Maybe you are looking for