CQ 5.5 Workflow package not working in CQ 5.6

Hi,
I have a CQ Workflow package which is triggered on asset uploads in DAM. It was craeted for CQ 5.5 and works very well there. Now when I tried to install it in CQ 5.6 it does not seem to be working at all. The only error I see in logs is "Process definition not found" related to the package. There is no other information whatsoever.
Can anyone provide any directions on what could be the issue ?
I thought there would be backward compatibility between CQ 5.6 and 5.5 but clearly it is not the case.
Appreciate any help here.
Thanks!

Hi,
The issue seems to be with CQ 5.6 & Java 1.7. One of the workaround is by adding -XX:-UseSplitVerifier option to the JVM. Also you have to update the API from 'com.day.cq.workflow' to 'com.adobe.granite.workflow' .
Thanks
Siva

Similar Messages

Workflow is not working

Hi everybody;
I'm teaching in a University and recently was provided to us a server for testing Podcasting lectures. Xserve 2 Ghz PowerPC G5, 1Gb RAM and 232 Gb HD (just 9 GB used), Leopard 10.5.2 OS. Of course we choose the hard way so no assistance for setup was hired.
My problem is that I can subscribe to my Podcast server with iTunes but I get "no new episodes from Podmac(my group)".
(1) I went into Server Admin under Podcast Producer and set the default Properties. (2) xGrid services and Podcast Producer are runnig.(3) open directory and kerberos are running in the same server. My guess workflow is not working; the files stacking up in the podcast recording directory and nothing goes to the podcasts directory. At Podcast producer server Log I get;
+Thu Apr 10 20:58:54 -0500 2008 -- Processing Podcast Producer Job ID: 14+
+Thu Apr 10 20:58:54 -0500 2008 -- Using workflow bundle:+
+/System/Library/PodcastProducer/Workflows/Blog and iTunes with+
intro.pwf
+Thu Apr 10 20:58:54 -0500 2008 -- Assembling Metadata for recording:+
458D24C4-DFD0-48CD-BDE2-0A3E1530502F
+Thu Apr 10 20:58:54 -0500 2008 -- Processing:+
/Podcasts/Recordings/458D24C4-DFD0-48CD-BDE2-0A3E1530502F/user_metadata.plist
+Thu Apr 10 20:58:59 -0500 2008 -- Processing Podcast Producer Job ID: 14+
+Thu Apr 10 20:58:59 -0500 2008 -- Using wor+
Using the xGrid admin I can see the agent available but none job is listed. Can anyone help me pls?

Officially, Podcast Producer only supports Intel-based agents. On a PowerPC based Xserve, the agent ranking will be zero, and podcast producer jobs will not run.
Some people have modified the workflows to ignore the ranking, but there are no guarantees the workflows will run correctly if that's done.

Need to re-install CS5.5 on my new hard drive. Serial number from disk package not working.

I need to re-install CS5.5 on my new hard drive. Serial number from disk package not working.

if there's a problem with the number of installations, you'll see a message about an excess activation problem.
if that's what you're seeing, contact adobe support for an activation count reset, https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html
otherwise, attach a screenshot of the error message or quote it.

SCCM 2012 Primary Site Recovery - Packages not working

I recently had to recover my Primary Site due to system crashes with blue screens on a daily basis. I was running ConfigMgr 2012 SP CU 3 and as part of the process I migrated from WS2008 R2 to WS2012 R2.
After many hours of perusing the web, I found the solutions to deal with the common site recovery issues such as SSL certs, and the content validation due to an empty ContentLib folder. I also had the issue with the update source where it listed the old
WSUS 3.2 server and the new one so the Site GUID was also updated.
The issue I am currently experiencing is that packages new or old including software update packages are not working. When using the script by Peter VanWoulde it lists the Deployment State as Error. I have tried redistributing them, valdiating the content,
removing distribution points, adding in new distribution points and even recreating some of the smaller packages to test but nothing is working.
Application deployments are working without issues.
This is the tail end of the WindowsUpdate.log file
2013-11-20 22:03:27:281 1632 a84 COMAPI >>-- RESUMED -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = CcmExec]
2013-11-20 22:03:28:098 1632 a84 COMAPI - Updates found = 176
2013-11-20 22:03:28:098 1632 a84 COMAPI ---------
2013-11-20 22:03:28:098 1632 a84 COMAPI -- END -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = CcmExec]
2013-11-20 22:03:28:098 1632 a84 COMAPI -------------
2013-11-20 22:03:32:139 1020 980 Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
This is the UpdatesDeployment.log file
Assignment {FD1118D2-563C-44D4-99DB-0CBE29C5C01A} has total CI = 432 UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:31:14 AM 4572 (0x11DC)
Deadline received for assignment ({FD1118D2-563C-44D4-99DB-0CBE29C5C01A}) UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:31:14 AM 4572 (0x11DC)
Detection job ({F5229872-7A7E-4692-B709-63989F708AF0}) started for assignment ({FD1118D2-563C-44D4-99DB-0CBE29C5C01A}) UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:31:14 AM 4572 (0x11DC)
Progress received for assignment ({FD1118D2-563C-44D4-99DB-0CBE29C5C01A}) UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:31:26 AM 4572 (0x11DC)
EnumerateUpdates for action (UpdateActionInstall) - Total actionable updates = 0 UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:47:50 AM 3588 (0x0E04)
EnumerateUpdates for action (UpdateActionInstall) - Total actionable updates = 0 UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:47:51 AM 3588 (0x0E04)
EnumerateUpdates for action (UpdateActionInstall) - Total actionable updates = 0 UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:47:55 AM 3588 (0x0E04)
EnumerateUpdates for action (UpdateActionInstall) - Total actionable updates = 0 UpdatesDeploymentAgent 21/11/2013 8:47:55 AM 2908 (0x0B5C)
At this point I am running out of ideas of where to look.

Hi Xin,
Sorry for not responding earlier but I did recover the site using the guidelines in the following article Backup and Recovery in Configuration Manager,
however there were a few issues.
I did not have a ContentLib backup so all the content had to be redistributed and validated before that worked. None of my packages new or old would work. I eventually found an article from a forum member who also initiated a Site Reset as part of their
recovery process and had no issues.
So it seems that any packages are still not working and i think I narrowed it down.
For some reason even though my DP and MP are all set for HTTPS, it is trying to access the HTTP path for SMS_DP_SMSPKG$. I am using PKI certs so this is the correct path but it should be HTTPS.
Excerpt from log.
Retrying DoUpdateSourceListAll task SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
Product {16A45552-A143-4EE6-8CA4-8D95FB5EEB7E} is installed for user SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
Adding 2 local DPs and 0 remote DPs for product {16A45552-A143-4EE6-8CA4-8D95FB5EEB7E} SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
Adding install source C:\Windows\ccmcache\5l\ to source list for product {16A45552-A143-4EE6-8CA4-8D95FB5EEB7E} SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
UpdateURLWithTransportSettings(): OLD URL - http://xxxxx.com/sms_dp_smspkg$/p01000ae SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
UpdateURLWithTransportSettings(): HTTP requested but client settings prohibit it. SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
Failed source list update for product {16A45552-A143-4EE6-8CA4-8D95FB5EEB7E}, error 87d00226 SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
DoUpdateSourceListAll task failed, error code 87d00226 SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
Source list update task failed, will be retried after 3600 seconds SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)
MSI update source list task finished successfully SrcUpdateMgr 09/12/2013 2:26:51 PM 3140 (0x0C44)

Import scenario package not working

Hi exports,
On a test environment i created a scenario which i now would like to transfer to another server.
I exported the correct scenario, but on the other server, the import is not working.
I can submit my package, it shows that there is no current version of this package, but hitting the "IMPORT" button doesnt do anything.
Im using (on both servers) SAP B1 9.0 pl 08 with the same integration framework.
Any idea's on how to solve this?
Kind regards
Frederik

Hi Radosla,
Yep, thx for the hint.
Looks like i put it on th test server in compatibility mode, but not on the real server.
Changing this with F12 to IE 8 did the trick!
Regards
Frederik

Setting Workflow status not working in imported workflow from SPD to Visual Studio

Hi all,
I have created SPD workflow and imported in visual studio. When I deploy imported Workflow using visual studio feature I found that Setting Workflow Status action is not working. Do I need to change Set Workflow status activity in Visual studio to make it
work.
Rohit Pasrija

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that Setting Workflow status did not work in imported workflow from SharePoint Designer to Visual Studio.
I try to reproduce the issue and the result is the same as yours.
After I import the workflow, choose the .xoml file, the view is as below:
To troubleshooting the issue, I add a new item to the project and select “Sequential Workflow” in the template.
After I click the Tool, I find that there don’t have the “SetCustomWorkflowStatus1” activity.
To set the status of the state, we need to use the “Set State” Activity in the “SharePoint Workflow” toolbar.
That is the reason why the “SetCustomWorkflowStatus1” activity does no work.
More information:
Apply Custom Values to Visual Studio Workflow Statuses
Thanks,
Linda Li
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Workflow does not work from Script Menu or as Application

Hi,
I create a really simple script to adjust podcast volume...
1. Get Specified iTunes Items (Recently added podcast – my smart folders of recently downloaded items)
2. Filter Songs in iTunes (Volume Adjustment is 0: so the workflow will not touch podcasts already adjusted.)
3. Set Options of iTunes Songs (Volume Adjustment: 80)
The workflow works find when running from Automator. But when I save it as script plug-in or application and try to run it, nothing happens. Please help. Thanks.
P.S. I tried to create folder action script that adjust the volume automatically when a podcast is downloaded (get selected items -> set options in iTunes songs). At first it works. Now it doesn't.

It starts by pausing iTunes, executes a applescript where there are say commands, pauses for 3 seconds, gets info from ical, filters out todays events, speaks these events out loud, fetches a weather report via web(xml), speaks out loud, pauses a couple of seconds, gets current itunes song, resumes playing of this song and the workflow is finished.
It quits right before it is about to announce todays events. Doesnt matter if there are events for today or not. If I start the application manually however, everything seems fine.
The Applescript used to launch the program:
tell application "TodaysiCal"
run
end tell
Any suggestions now ?

[SOLVED] Rosgarden package not working

Hi everybody,
it's my first post here, so I hope I get all things done.
I installed the new version of Rosegarden (10.02; i686 architecture) for the first time yesterday evening. I wanted to check out its features.
Rosegarden's package information:
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra … osegarden/
I usually start programs via the Bash. But when starting Rosegarden this error occurs:
[user@asterix ~]$ rosegarden
rosegarden: symbol lookup error: rosegarden: undefined symbol: _ZN9QListData7detach3Ev
It seems that there's something (a package?!?) missing.
I installed Rosegarden with Pacman:
[2010-02-15 19:37] synchronizing package lists
[2010-02-15 19:41] installed liblrdf (0.4.0-6)
[2010-02-15 19:41] installed liblo (0.26-1)
[2010-02-15 19:41] installed dssi (1.0.0-3)
[2010-02-15 19:41] installed rosegarden (10.02-1)
According to Rosegarden's package information the following packages are required (the missing one were installed by Pacman itself; in brackets the installed version):
- fftw (3.2.2-1)
- qt (4.5.3-4)
- liblrdf (0.4.0-6)
- dssi (1.0.0-3)
- ladspa (1.13-2)
- liblo (0.26-1)
- lirc-utils (0.8.6-3)
- shared-mime-info (0.71-1)
I've searched for previous errors:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=82791
There's no relation to my problem.
It would be great if someone has a clue what to do. I hope all necessary information were mentioned.
Thanks.
Last edited by Schwefelsaeure (2010-02-17 23:20:30)

Hi,
sorry for my late reply, but I was busy the all day long.
Thank you 'drcouzelis' for the tip to build Rosegarden on my own (with ABS).
The building process took a while on my old AMD Athlon XP 1900+ but it works now.
Unfortunately I don't know what went wrong before. It's the first package (within Pacman) which does not work since I've been using Arch Linux (about three years now).
Arch Linux is a great distribution with a great and helpful community.
Thanks for support.

Package not working

I migrated from JDK1.3 to JDK1.4. Paths are set to bin and even classpath is set to c:\jdk1.4\lib;. The program is compiling and running fine.
The problem I come across is that when I use Packages in my program the program would not compile showing that package so and so does not exist and cannot resolve symbol etc. Even the programs that I compiled when I had ver1.3 doesn't seem to compile in JDK1.4. My platform is win2000 Professional. Please help me regarding this.

Thank you for your advice. It went wrong in setting the class path. I set it to c:\j2se1.4.0\lib; This created the problem. I removed this line in the Environment settings and package is working fine now. Thank you for your suggestion anyway.
Yours friendly,
Saravana Kumar. J

Automatic approval workflow does not work anymore

Hi,
Our automatic approval workflows configured via standard business configuration sets (process controlled) do not work anymore. They did work previously.
After changing the BUS objects 'automatic approval' workflow into the 1-step manager approval workflow it does work.
- The 'automatic approval' workflow does not seem to generate a workitem, the bbp_pd 'workflow' part is empty. In addition previously approved documents via 'automatic approval' do not contain workitem details via bbp_pd either anymore.
- We applied a new SP (SP07) not that long ago.
- These documents go into status: 'awaiting approval', the documents 'approval' details tell us the following:
001 Automatic Approval Valid (Can be Started) Open (No Decision Made) SYSTEM system
However the system does not execute the task, how come? What normally ensures the system executes these 'automatic approval' tasks (report?)?
Any input is very much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Tim

Hi Balaji,
In SRM 7.0,
Our automatic approval workflows configured via standard business configuration sets (process controlled) do not work anymore. They did work previously.
- The 'automatic approval' workflow does not seem to generate a workitem, the bbp_pd 'workflow' part is empty. In addition previously approved documents via 'automatic approval' do not contain workitem details via bbp_pd either anymore.
- - These documents go into status: 'awaiting approval', the documents 'approval' details tell us the following:
001 Automatic Approval Valid (Can be Started) Open (No Decision Made) SYSTEM system
However the system does not execute the task, how come? What normally ensures the system executes these 'automatic approval' tasks (report?)?
Any input is very much appreciated.
Regards,
Shears

IDM - GRC AC 5.3 integration - workflow detour not working as expected

Hi IDM Experts!
I would greatly appreciate your help with the problem we're currently facing; when integrating IDM with GRC, we have configured 2 CUP workflows; one for handling requests with SoD violations (Workflow B) and one to handle ones without any SoD violations (Workflow C), with the former handling risk analysis followed by role approval, and the latter handling only role approval; we have one path with one stage configured as "No Stage" (Workflow A); this path is used to decide which of the primary workflows to use (i.e. SoD violations or no SoD violations) using two detours; we have one detour configured to use Workflow B if any SoD violations are found in the request and another detour configured to use Workflow C if no SoD violations are found.
Currently what happens in our tests is that requests without risks / SoD violations work fine and actually get detoured to Workflow C, awaiting role approval from the right approver ; while requests with inherent risks / SoD violations unforutnately get automatically approved and provisioned rather than being sent to Workflow B
Any clues as to why this could be happening? We've checked if there are any settings that might be triggering it to automatically approve requests despite any risks, but can't find anything of the sort; Would be very grateful for any insight / advice on the issue.
Thanks a lot in advance!
Best regards,
Sandeep

Hi Diego!
Once again; thank you for your quick reply!
I did recheck the auto-provisioning issue and I can confirm that it is definitely set to "No Auto-provisioning" and it hasn't been changed recently. The strange thing is that the detour works for NO SoD violations, but doesn't work for SoD violations; find below the audit trail for detour working:
Request XXX Submitted by Sandeep (SANDEEP) on 01/28/2012 02:04
   Z_111111-ECC Role Added with validity dates 01/28/2012-12/31/9999
Request submitted for approval by admin(system) on 01/28/2012 02:04
Approved by Sandeep (SANDEEP) on behalf of Sandeep (SANDEEP) at path WORKFLOW_A and stage WORKFLOW_A on 01/28/2012 02:04
   Approved Z_111111-ECC role for Add action with validity dates 01/28/2012-12/31/9999
Request has taken a detour to path C_WORKFLOW and stage C_STAGE on 01/28/2012 02:04
   Detour condition SOD Violations with value No is satisfied at path WORKFLOW_A and stage WORKFLOW_A
and find below the audit trail for the detour not working:
Request YYY Submitted by Sandeep (SANDEEP) on 01/28/2012 01:53
   Z_222222-ECC Role Added with validity dates 01/28/2012-12/31/9999
Request submitted for approval by admin(system) on 01/28/2012 01:53
Approved by Sandeep (SANDEEP) on behalf of Sandeep (SANDEEP) at path WORKFLOW_A and stage WORKFLOW_A on 01/28/2012 01:53
   Approved Z_222222-ECC role for Add action with validity dates 01/28/2012-12/31/9999
Request Closed By Sandeep (SANDEEP) on 01/28/2012 01:53
I even checked the CUA System section, and the "By system" tab and it was empty; there were no specific system configurations.
And to answer your questions:
Since Workflow A is the path with the Initiator, the detour flag is deactivated and the active flag is activated.
WF B & C have both the active and detour flags activated.
Thanks a lot again for your quick responses and all the help you've provided so far!
Best regards,
Sandeep

Why is the second procedure in my package not working??

Hi I have a package that I want to run every 15 minutes. When I try to run the procedures manually and each one seperately they work. But when I put together these procedures in a package, the second procedure does not work or not updating the table. Any idea why this is creating a problem??
PROCEDURE UPDATE_CS_ACTIVITY is the one in the below package that does not seems working .. but when i run the procedure manually it works fine.
Any help in this regard is greatly appreciated...
Thanx in advance
Here is the Package code:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY UPDATE_ACTIVITY AS
CSREWORK NUMBER(4);
CSTRACKOUT NUMBER(4);
STARTDATE VARCHAR2(20);
ENDDATE VARCHAR2(20);
PROCEDURE INSERTVALUES IS
BEGIN
DELETE FROM 2DAY_ACTIVITY;
IF SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'),12,2) > 18
THEN
STARTDATE := '18:30:00';
INSERT INTO 2DAY_ACTIVITY(STAGESTEPPROD,RESOURCES,CSTRACKOUT)
SELECT "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES",COUNT(TRACKOUTTIME)
FROM "ACT_1DAY_VIEW" "ACT_VIEW"
GROUP BY "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES" WHERE "ACT_VIEW"."TRACKOUTTIME" > SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'),1,10)||' '||STARTDATE AND ISREWORKSTEP = 'F';
INSERT INTO WAFER_2DAY_ACTIVITY(STAGESTEPPROD,RESOURCES,CSREWORK)
SELECT "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES",COUNT(TRACKOUTTIME)
FROM "ACT_1DAY_VIEW" "ACT_VIEW"
GROUP BY "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES" WHERE "ACT_VIEW"."TRACKOUTTIME" > SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'),1,10)||' '||STARTDATE AND ISREWORKSTEP = 'T';
COMMIT;
ELSE
     STARTDATE := '06:30:00';
     INSERT INTO 2DAY_ACTIVITY(STAGESTEPPROD,RESOURCES,CSTRACKOUT)
SELECT "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES",COUNT(TRACKOUTTIME)
FROM "ACT_1DAY_VIEW" "ACT_VIEW"
GROUP BY "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES" WHERE "ACT_VIEW"."TRACKOUTTIME" > SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'),1,10)||' '||STARTDATE AND ISREWORKSTEP = 'F';
INSERT INTO 2DAY_ACTIVITY(STAGESTEPPROD,RESOURCES,CSREWORK)
SELECT "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES",COUNT(TRACKOUTTIME)
FROM "ACT_1DAY_VIEW" "ACT_VIEW"
GROUP BY "ACT_VIEW"."STAGESTEPPROD","ACT_VIEW"."RESOURCES" WHERE "ACT_VIEW"."TRACKOUTTIME" > SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'),1,10)||' '||STARTDATE AND ISREWORKSTEP = 'T';
     COMMIT;
END IF;
END INSERTVALUES;
PROCEDURE UPDATE_CS_ACTIVITY AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO CS_ACTIVITY(STAGESTEPPROD, RESOURCES, CSTRACKOUT, CSREWORK) select MAX(stagestepprod),MAX(resources), max(cstrackout) ,max(csrework) from 2day_activity group by 2DAY_ACTIVITY.stagestepprod,2DAY_ACTIVITY.resources;
COMMIT;
END UPDATE_CS_ACTIVITY;
END UPDATE_ACTIVITY;

You have create global variables CSREWORK and CSTRACKOUT
in your package.
Your have then selected the
max(cstrackout) ,max(csrework) which would probably pick these variables up.
Rename your variables to v_CSREWORK and v_CSTRACKOUT or remove altogether as no sign they are being used which should fix that problem. The normal naming standard for oracle is to name variables with a v_ and parameters with a p_ to prevent problems with naming.

Multiple scheduled workflows does not work correctly

Hi All,
I hava made a simple workflow who executes a powershell script with the latest SMLETS, this workflows is triggered when a new incident is created and after the script change the status of the related computer that is affected by the incident.
When I do this just for one computer it works very fine, but when I create by example 4 incidents for several computers the workflows does not change the status of the comptuers.
For the moment I create a incident and I wait the workflows is finished and i continue to create the next incident it is ok. But I cannot to put this in production environment where several analyst create incient for several devices.
Any Idea?
Thank you
MIKE

Hi,
Ben was right when asked you to share the PS code.
It seems that it works for one instance and doesn't work for multiple ones. It's a regular case when you get objects using search request. Share the PowerShell code and receive the prompt within minutes.
Cheers,
Marat
Site: www.scutils.com Twitter:
LinkedIn:
Facebook:

[SOLVED] bibble5pro aur package not working?

Hi together,
i did
yaourt -S -aur bibble5pro
and installed this package. Worked without error, but by starting bibble5pro i got this:
[vinschni@myhost ~]$ bibble5pro
Install Path: /opt/bibble5pro
LD_PATH: /opt/bibble5pro/lib:
XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS: 1
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7810000)
libkodakcms.so => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libkodakcms.so (0xb7795000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/libuuid.so.1 (0xb7773000)
libtcmalloc_minimal.so.0 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libtcmalloc_minimal.so.0 (0xb7741000)
libQtSvg.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtSvg.so.4 (0xb76f5000)
libQt3Support.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQt3Support.so.4 (0xb740f000)
libQtSql.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtSql.so.4 (0xb7376000)
libQtOpenGL.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtOpenGL.so.4 (0xb7301000)
libGLU.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 (0xb7293000)
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 (0xb71cf000)
libQtNetwork.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtNetwork.so.4 (0xb70d2000)
libQtDesigner.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtDesigner.so.4 (0xb6df6000)
libQtScript.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtScript.so.4 (0xb6cd5000)
libQtXml.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtXml.so.4 (0xb6c90000)
libQtGui.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtGui.so.4 (0xb63a8000)
libpng12.so.0 => not found
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xb639f000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xb6388000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0xb637b000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xb6372000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xb636a000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xb62e5000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xb62b7000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb62a9000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb618f000)
libQtCore.so.4 => /opt/bibble5pro/lib/libQtCore.so.4 (0xb5f69000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb5f54000)
libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0xb5f50000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xb5f47000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xb5e82000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb5e7e000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xb5e64000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb5d6d000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb5d47000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb5d2a000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb5be3000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7811000)
libpng12.so.0 => not found
libpng12.so.0 => not found
libpng12.so.0 => not found
libGLcore.so.1 => /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1 (0xb45d2000)
libnvidia-tls.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnvidia-tls.so.1 (0xb45cf000)
libpng12.so.0 => not found
libpng12.so.0 => not found
libexpat.so.1 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xb45a9000)
libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libxcb.so.1 (0xb4590000)
libpcre.so.0 => /lib/libpcre.so.0 (0xb455d000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0xb455a000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0xb4555000)
./bibblepro: error while loading shared libraries: libpng12.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Is there maybe missing a dependency in pkgbuild? Starting with root access dosen't make a difference. Hope somebody has an idea.
Greetings,
Vinschni
Last edited by Vinschni (2010-04-16 12:11:51)

Got it working.
In libpng12 PKGBUILD was an error in line 26. After deleting
patch -p1 -i "${srcdir}/libpng-1.2.38-apng.patch" || return 1
build was successful.
Vinschni

Workflow does not work properly

Hi experts,
I had configure approval process for my folder. The problem is when i upload a file, there is no email sent for approval. I have a FSDB repository. What went wrong? Appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
Nanie

Hello,
Workflow does not start automatically by uploading documents.
You have to Submit for Approval these documents.
Regards
BP

CQ 5.5 Workflow package not working in CQ 5.6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for