CR for Eclipse Update Released

Hello All! A new update for Crystal Reports for Eclipse is now available. This update contains fixes reported by CR for Eclipse users. For a list of the fixes available, consult the <a href="http://www.businessobjects.com/products/dev_zone/eclipse/cr4e-updates-readme.pdf" target="_blank">readme.pdf</a>. To get the latest updates, use the Update Manager in Eclipse. If you don't already have CR for Eclipse installed, follow the steps found <a href="/node/432" target="_blank">here</a> and you will get the latest version. If you already have CR for Eclipse installed, then follow the instructions below: 1. From Eclipse, click on the Help menu, and then Software Updates > Find and Install... to open the Install/Update wizard. 2. Select "Search for updates of the currently installed features" and click Next. If, and when, prompted with the Update Site Mirrors dialog, simply accept the default mirror sites and click on OK to continue. This may take a few minutes to complete. 3. After the update manager finished searching for available updates, the following dialog appears. Ensure the Business Objects Update Site is checked. If you do not wish to install the other updates, uncheck the update(s) that are not required. Click the Next button to continue. <img src="/files/images/cr4e_updates_dialog.bmp" alt="Eclipse Update Manager" title="Eclipse Update Manager" width="585" height="487" align="absmiddle" /> 4. Review and accept the license agreements for each Feature and click the Next button, and then the Finish button. The update manager will take some time to download all of the Features.5. During the download, you will be prompted with the Verification dialog to accept the (un)signed features. Click on the Install All button to install all the features.6. After Eclipse verifies and installs the Features, it is recommended that you restart Eclipse.For all your feedback, please use the Crystal Reports for Eclipse <a href="/forum/193" target="_blank">forums</a> to place your comments. We will make every effort to respond to your comments. Mandeep Jassal Program Manager Business Objects

I don't want to install for:
1) I would be the only developer on my team with it installed (differing development environments begs for disaster)
2) There seems to be a real disconnect in how Crystal is begin updated. For example, can you tell which version of the Crystal jars CR4E is using?
I was previously using CR XI R2 jar files in my project. I ran into a snag (JRC failed to honor table alias names) in which the tech rep suggested I "back down" to using the CR4E jar files to fix my problem. I now have a case logged in which the native pervasive driver has a major disconnect while retrieving the data. This fix is in FP2.4 for CR XI R2. See my scenario? What is being fixed in one release is getting broken in another.
My only purpose with the JRC is to run the reports. I do my design work in the CR designer.
Yes, I am fully aware my key for CR XI works in CR4E as well as CR XI R2.
Thanks for the feedback and if there is anyway of pushing the separate download along, it gets my vote.
Victor M. Scott

Similar Messages

Crystal Reports for Eclipse Update 4 is now available!

Hello All! The next update for Crystal Reports for Eclipse has been released and it now supports Eclipse 3.3. In addition to some product fixes, this update will support the Data Source Explorer view in Eclipse 3.3. For information on how to get the latest update, refer to the following link: <a href="/node/3866">http://diamond.businessobjects.com/node/3866</a>Additional Information: <a href="http://www.businessobjects.com/products/dev_zone/eclipse/cr4e-updates-readme.pdf" target="_blank">Product Fix Readme</a> <a href="/node/447">Release Notes</a> For all your feedback, please use the Crystal Reports for Eclipse <a href="/forum/193">forums</a> to place your comments. We will make every effort to respond to your comments. Mandeep Jassal Program Manager Business Objects

Mandeep,
Any ideas where to find the changelog from release 1.0.3 to release 1.0.4?
The linked "Product Fix Readme" seems to aggregate all changes since version 1.0.0.
Thanks.

JavaFX Studio 1.0.2 plug-in for Eclipse released

JavaFX Studio 1.0.2 plug-in for Eclipse released (free)
Release info: [http://mkblog.exadel.com/tools/exadel-javafx-studio-plug-in-for-eclipse-102-released/]
Download: [http://exadel.com/web/portal/javafxstudio]

Have you already tested it? Is it better than netbeans plug-in? What are the new features and why I should change to plug-in for Eclipse?
Best regards,
André Rezende

Solaris Update Release Query

As a requirement for Oracle 11g I need Solaris 10 to be on at least update 6.
I am currently on update 4.
Applying the patch bundle isn't an option as the 11g upgrade pre-req checks needs to see that /etc/release specificies u6 or greater.
What I'd like to know is, will installing the Oracle Solaris OS Recommended Patchset achieve this or do I need to go for an Update Release?
As far as I can see on this is that only the latest update release version is available through OTN which I can't use as our EMC software is not compatible with it and there is no fix yet. OTN points to MOS for older updates but I can only see Patch Bundles and Patch Sets.
Many thanks in advance
Paul

I have not used these myself but did you try the instructions near the bottom:
"Older Versions of Solaris
Older versions of Solaris can also be requested by logging a Physical Media Request through My Oracle Support. Follow the instructions above. If a download is sufficient, please state this in the request."
I have no idea how long it would take to get Physical Media but that maybe your best option.
I do not have the details but I think some of the vendors have patches for the latest Solaris 10 update - maybe bugging them would be fruitful.
GlenG

Oracle Enterprise pack for eclipse in Spring STS

I installed Oracle Enterprise Pack for Eclipse in Spring STS (Springsource Eclipse IDE). I want to use this for Oracle OSB development. After installing this I cannot find the options to create OSB project in STS.
Am I missing something?
I noticed that in Oracle Enterprise pack for eclipse IDE (the one installed with weblogic server) has Oracle Common Tools too. Do I need to install this one? If yes, where can I find the URL for eclipse update?

Those waiting for updated Kepler support will be happy to know that OEPE 12.1.1.2.2 was tested with Kepler RC3 and should work with final Kepler build when it comes out in a few weeks.

Download link for Crystal Reports for Eclipse 2.0 Release Update 12

Hi,
In Release note we found that the Unexpected database connector error is resolved while using JDBC result set in setDataSource in CR4E in Release update 12. Please give me the link to download the Release update 12 jars.

Hi,
Below is link for the Crystal report for Eclipse 2.0:
[http://www.businessobjects.com/campaigns/forms/downloads/crystal/eclipse/datasave.asp|http://www.businessobjects.com/campaigns/forms/downloads/crystal/eclipse/datasave.asp]
you could always refer to the following thread as Bryan updated with new releases :
[Crystal Reports for Eclipse 2.0 Release Update 8 is Now Available!|Crystal Reports for Eclipse 2.0 Release Update 8 is Now Available!;
Hope this will help
Regards,
Rameez Shaikh

Exclusive update release for Adobe Cloud customers

Excuse me, Adobe.
Don't get this wrong, I personally have nothing against Adobe. Please know and realize that Adobe probably don't realize this, or simply don't have a heart to realize this by now. Adobe actually losing some valuable registered lifetime 'diehard' Adobe customers like other creative professionals and myself.
Yesterday I learned that Adobe released exclusive update release only for Adobe Creative Cloud customers with Illustrator's new package update. I find that very ironic approach, because I know that diehard Adobe Illustrator customers have request for it for years. Adobe basically ignored us, creative professionals, instead of us, focusing on Adobe Creative Cloud customers.
Rest assured, Adobe Master Collection CS6 is more likely my final upgrade purchase. It was a big slap in my face. I know that it is not just me, knowing that many other creative professionals are upset as I am.
Don't get me wrong, I wholeheartedly am (now was) a lifetime diehard Adobe customer.
Dear Adobe, just tell me if I am wrong. I just cannot justify the cost benefit analysis on advantage of Adobe Creative Cloud, where it is more of "renting" while many other creative professionals including myself prefer traditional way of upgrading through Adobe online store just as in the past and at present time. Many of us prefer "traditional" way of "owning" Adobe Creative Suite apps rather than 'renting' apps. In a long run, by owning traditional app/purchase do have super duper advantage over Cloud in terms of real cost of doing business. While traditional customers like myself still own Adobe apps even if when Adobe decides no longer support, we still own the legacy versions regardless.
So, what happens if one day, out of blue, I fear that Adobe eventually realize that Adobe Creative Cloud is not viable or feasible to continue. That will certainly make some customers not happy. What happens to traditional customers like creative professionals and myself spent huge amount of investment in traditional qualified upgrades, and then switched to Cloud.. then one day Adobe decide not to support Adobe Creative Cloud.. what does this means to traditional customers like myself owned versions of serialization numbers over the years - down in the drain and Adobe Creative Cloud 'temporary' annual serial number no longer viable, and force us to pay FULL traditional license all over again. In that case, that is where I am dealing with this concern. I just cannot possibly trust Adobe on that one. I do have huge benefit of doubt on that one.
For example, with Adobe decided to invest some of its resources developed new applications such as Adobe Flash Catalyst and few others in Adobe Creative Suite CS5. When Adobe released CS6, Adobe dropped Flash Catalyst. That is one of example on why I do have benefit of doubt on long term viability and feasibility of Adobe Creative Cloud.
Please listen to us, creative professionals out of our concerns.
If Adobe refuse to listen, include us in that respect, so be it. It is possible that Adobe eventually be losing many lifetime, diehard Adobe creative professionals.
To be honest, I am very disappointed with Adobe's attitude toward creative professionals' being diehard lifetime support and invested lot of our time, tools, and skills and everything... time and money. It is all down in the drain. Thanks!
Have a fabulous day!

And customers fall for it like suckers.
Software development during the emergence of a new category has always been lucrative. A small handful of developers with a good idea sweat blood for a couple years building the core application. Once it exists, delivery is cheap and profit-per-sale is high. Users buy licenses for several hundreds of dollars each. Each new license sale costs next to nothing to replicate in terms of manufacturing. It's all marketing, packaging, and distrubution. Disks are copied and printed for less than $1 each. Printed manuals, of course, may cost $20 or so, depending on color, quality, etc. There is real overhead, of course, in developing good content for manuals.
When all this stuff was new software titles used to cost less, but shipped with installation disks and thorough printed manuals, and a set of added-value extras, like utilities, fonts, clipart. And new version improvements were quite significant and innovative.
But once the software category "matures," with each version, the prices go up; the bundled "extras" become fewer. The focus shifts toward continually look for ways to cheap-out on the customers in order to "improve" the margin for the stockholders, and "milk" the increasingly archaic and mundane software for all that can be got out of it. One way this is done is by turning real value into mere perceived value. Adobe is the worst offender in this regard.
Print manuals have become pay-extra, or non-existent. It astounds me that in the much-ballyhooed age of "information at your fingertips" the ondisk local help has become increasingly difficult and tedious to access. Now, the default behavior of the Help menu has even been modified to disuade users from accessing local PDF versions of the documentation to coerce them to go online for help files access (this from the company that is highly dependent upon PDF). Slow, tedious, and non-contextual as it is, PDF was bad enough. Having to go to Adobe's crappy "community help" system is ridiculous.
This is all promoted, of course, as "immediate access to continual improvement." And customers fall for it like suckers.
Look at the increasingly innane questions that occur daily in this Forum. Newcomers ask the most basic questions, making it obvious they haven't even tried to read page one of the documentation. I've been at this stuff since the beginning. It didn't used to be this way.
Are they all lazy dolts? No. Documentation has become less accessible and less thorough.
Next, Adobe turns the online documentation essentially into blogs. "Live feedback"? "Continual improvement"? Baloney. Beginners clutter what should be authoritative documentation with innane comments. Questions get transferred to the User Forums, where Adobe sluffs off its responsibility for product support to its users; which more often than not turns into a time-wasting process of the blind leading the blind.
Of course, only a mere mention of the term "tech support" will suffice. Everyone knows what thas become.
Once you've eliminated the costs of printing, packaging, and delivering disks and documentation, and turned everything into electronic downloads (causing each customer hours of downtime--often even days futzing around with Adobe's horrible installers), what's next? Stockholders still want increased margin.
Software by subscription and web-centric automation--while still increasing prices, of course--has long been the holy grail of software developers. This is true of all the biggies, including Microsoft, and of course Adobe. But how do you pull it off? How do you convince the suckers?
Releasing new features to the buzzword "cloud" before making them available to perpetual licensees will be Adobe's attempt to "sweeten the pot" to con those who buy into the software subscription scheme. Time will tell how successful the ruse is for Adobe.
The truth is, though, in terms of actual quality of the product, (especially Illustrator) nothing has changed for the better. Look at the very features that we who choose to stay with the relative safety of a traditional license are so upset about: Bundle for output? Export embedded images?
People, how archaic, how old, how yesterdecade's news is that? This is "quick development" that can only be delivered by the "cloud"? Give me a break.
It's utterly laughable, as Illustrator's cobby, clumsy, over-glorified, under-delivered, decades-late-to-the-game delevery of practical functionality always has been. So what's the big rush anyway for features that are already literal decades late? Sheesh, guys, Illustrator is not the only game in town.
Consider: Since the release of CS6, how many posts have you forum regulars seen expressing excitement over the precious few actually new features, like grads-on-strokes? How many stunning examples of use of that feature have you seen users post?
By comarison, how many posts have you seen on complaints about performance and buggy behavior? And proportionally how many are still the endless stream of repeats of the same old questions from newcomers trying to make sense out of Illustrator's uncomparably unintuitive, cluttered, and confused interface? I see the latter largely increasing. And I take that as clear indication that Adobe's treatment of "newfangled" documentation is not working. (And, of course, that Illustrator's interface is still as hideously unintutitve as it has always been.)
Meanwhile, for the first time in too many years, I actually experienced again that new-purchase satisfaction of money-well-spent when I opened the Corel Graphic Design X6 Suite package to find a full-color manual with a hard-bound cover no less! Upgrade cost for anyone with a copy two full versions old? $200. Comes with 1000 OpenType fonts, huge clipart collection, truly useful utilities, and alot more.
I still get a thrill out of every new release of Xara Designer Pro. So much elegant functionality, such clean-running speed, so stunning results possible from that tidy, inviting, intuitive interface in so affordably-priced and fun-to-use application.
Meanwhile, Adobe upgrades have become more burden than pleasure. I actually dread them, especially having been suckered into the whole "Master Collection" thing. CS6 still sits on my desk uninstalled. I just dread having to mess with it.
Oh, but James! That's why you should buy into "the creative cloud"!
Well, don't hold your breath, bucko. If I decide to let CS7 or whatever just slide right by, I'll still be able to keep running the version I've got--without sending a monthly check to Adobe.
These days--when so many younsters who have never swung a hammer at a nail actually try to rationalize renting over home ownership; and when so many middle-agers rationalize making perpetual interest payments for the instant gratification of driving a new car every year--who knows; the "creative cloud" sham may actually succeed.
But not with me. Instead of watching money automatically fly out the window by itself, I'll be chuckling away, using whichever of my usual collection of 2D vector drawing programs I feel most advantageous--or most fun--for the task at hand.
JET

Verizon Lumia Icon Denim update teased for possible February release

Fingers crossed
Verizon Lumia Icon owners are a passionate crowd and seemingly asking on a daily basis when the promised Lumia Denim update for their phones will be delivered. In late 2014 it was promised for "early 2015" but now we're into 2015 folks are getting itchy update fingers once again. Microsoft's Joe Belfiore is the target of a number of questions on the subject, and he's got a couple of things to say about it today.
"Lumia icon people asking what I meant by "early 2015": The first part of the year. In my mind that means jan/feb or so. Less likely March."
"Know that Vzw & MS are actively, daily working on getting it done. The test process has unpredictability so we can't say a firm end date"
Since January is done with that would suggest Microsoft and Verizon are aiming to push it out in February. But as with the second statement, it could easily slip due to circumstances beyond Microsoft's control. But it hasn't been forgotten about, at least.
Source: Verizon Lumia Icon Denim update teased for possible February release | Windows Central

I doubt it. JB's tweets were very, very vague and the very fact that he had to mention March means it's a lot more likely than not to be pushed past February.
I take this as a very bad sign for this phone. We've been hearing soon since September.

Critical update won't load for office 2011 released 2.10.15

A critical update appears for Office 2011 released 2.10.2015 14.4.8 113.6 MB
This update fixes critical issues.
As soon as it goes through all the install process, it says it was successful, Then it immediatlely shows up as a critical update needed AGAIN.
I can't figure why it will load.
Thanks

Does the ext directory have the php_oci8.dll? In the original steps the PHP dir is renamed. In the given php.in the extension_dir looks like it has been updated correctly. Since PHP distributes php_oci8.dll by default I reckon there would be a very good chance that the problem was somewhere else. Since this is an old thread I don't think we'll get much value from speculation.
-- cj

Microsoft releases fix for Windows Update corruption errors

See ZDnet article Microsoft releases fix for Windows Update corruption errors found @
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-releases-fix-for-windows-update-corruption-errors-7000026582/
The Microsoft KB article is found @
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947821
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

Hi Rick,
Really thanks for your sharing.
This will definitly help others in this forum.
Kate Li
TechNet Community Support

Why is it so hard for Firefox to keep up with "Snagit" update releases? The problem is in the scrolling capture (that hardly ever works) because FF is never able to keep up with any of their upgrades (or is that vice-verse?)

One of the more predominant features/capabilities of "Snagit''
(screen capture) software is its ability to perform scrolling captures. Unfortunately, with every update release (from Snagit) it takes Firefox at least two updates to capture the code to allow this function... to function!?
Under normal conditions, it is understood that one should logically take this to the software manufacturer to accommodate the browser (Firefox), however, the (always) fix to the problem is in waiting for Firefox to release one of its later updates... it has never been while waiting for Snagit to revise a fix.

You have it backwards, SnagIt needs to be compatible with Firefox.

Installation Fails via Update Site for Eclipse 3.2.1

<img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/395847965_01aaf8f849.jpg?v=0" alt="Install Failure" width="500" height="220" />This is the error I get when I try to install Crystal Reports for Eclipe (1.0.2.v795) using the update site. http://www.businessobjects.com/products/dev_zone/eclipse/Why is it requiring org.eclipse.ui 3.1.0? I think 1.0.0.v555 worked with Eclipse 3.2.Screenshot Image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ctaggart/395847965/ Cameron 

Hi Cameron, I believe the error message is indicating that our plugin is requiring a version of org.eclipse.ui 3.1.0 or higher. Does your current version of Eclipse have Crystal Reports for Eclipse already installed? If not, then it is likely you will need additional plugins from the Eclipse.org site which are not installed by default. I just tried this on my end and selected the Callisto Discovery Site as well as the Business Objects site. After selecting the latest version of CR4E, I expanded the Callisto Discovery Site and clicked the "Select Required" button. This allowed my download to go through. Can you confirm that you are following these steps? If you like I can upload a doc with a selection of screenshots demonstrating the steps I followed. Let me know and I will post it in a follow-up. Regards, Sean Johnson (CR4E Product Manager) <a href="http://www.eclipseplugincentral.com/Web_Links-index-req-ratelink-lid-639.html">Rate this plugin @ Eclipse Plugin Central</a>

Our Client gave a requirement to mass update the additional attributes in Install base for instances in Release 11i.

Hi,
Our Client gave a requirement to mass update the additional attributes in Install base for instances in Release 11i.
So I tried the below code to update:
But getting the error:
The Object Version Number passed does not match with the one existing in Installed Base tables.
Can any one please help how to fix it.
Code:
declare
x_instance_rec CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.INSTANCE_REC;
p_ext_attrib_values CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.EXTEND_ATTRIB_VALUES_TBL;
p_party_tbl CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.PARTY_TBL;
p_account_tbl CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.PARTY_ACCOUNT_TBL;
p_pricing_attrib_tbl CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.PRICING_ATTRIBS_TBL;
p_org_assignments_tbl CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.ORGANIZATION_UNITS_TBL;
p_asset_assignment_tbl CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.INSTANCE_ASSET_TBL;
p_txn_rec CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.TRANSACTION_REC;
x_instance_id_lst CSI_DATASTRUCTURES_PUB.ID_TBL;
x_return_status VARCHAR2(2000);
x_msg_count NUMBER;
x_msg_data VARCHAR2(2000);
x_msg_index_out NUMBER;
t_output VARCHAR2(2000);
t_msg_dummy NUMBER;
p_validation_level NUMBER;
p_commit VARCHAR2 (5);
p_init_msg_lst VARCHAR2 (500);
cursor stg_tab_cur is select instance_id,Safety_line_type from gewind_ib_iea_values;
TYPE stg_tab IS TABLE OF gewind_ib_iea_values%ROWTYPE INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
stg_tab_var stg_tab;
stg_tab_bin_int BINARY_INTEGER;
BEGIN
x_instance_rec.instance_id := FND_API.G_MISS_NUM;
x_instance_rec.object_version_number := FND_API.G_MISS_NUM;
p_txn_rec.transaction_id := FND_API.G_MISS_NUM;
p_txn_rec.transaction_date := SYSDATE;
p_txn_rec.source_transaction_date := SYSDATE;
p_txn_rec.transaction_type_id := 1;
stg_tab_bin_int :=0;
For gewind_ib_iea_values in stg_tab_cur LOOP
stg_tab_bin_int := stg_tab_bin_int + 1;
P_ext_attrib_values(stg_tab_bin_int).instance_id :=gewind_ib_iea_values.instance_id;
P_ext_attrib_values(stg_tab_bin_int).attribute_id := 10023;
P_ext_attrib_values(stg_tab_bin_int).attribute_value := gewind_ib_iea_values.Safety_line_type;
dbms_output.put_line(P_ext_attrib_values(stg_tab_bin_int).instance_id);
dbms_output.put_line(P_ext_attrib_values(stg_tab_bin_int).attribute_value);
csi_item_instance_pub.update_item_instance(
1.0,
p_commit,
p_init_msg_lst,
1,
x_instance_rec,
p_ext_attrib_values,
p_party_tbl,
p_account_tbl,
p_pricing_attrib_tbl,
p_org_assignments_tbl,
p_asset_assignment_tbl,
p_txn_rec, x_instance_id_lst,
x_return_status,
x_msg_count,
x_msg_data);
commit;
-- Output the results
if x_msg_count > 0 then
for j in 1 .. x_msg_count
loop
fnd_msg_pub.get ( j , FND_API.G_FALSE , x_msg_data , t_msg_dummy );
t_output := ( 'Msg' || To_Char ( j ) || ': ' || x_msg_data );
dbms_output.put_line ( SubStr ( t_output , 1 , 255 ) );
end loop;
end if;
dbms_output.put_line('x_return_status = '||x_return_status);
dbms_output.put_line('x_msg_count = '||TO_CHAR(x_msg_count));
dbms_output.put_line('x_msg_data = '||x_msg_data);
COMMIT;
end loop;
END;
Regards,
Ravichander

This question is Assumed Answered -- It would be great if you could share the solution with us.
Thanks,
Hussein

Announcement: Release 11gR1 (1.1.1.7) Available for Eclipse 3.6

Oracle remains committed to it's free Eclipse Plug-ins with a large new release of the tool - we're announcing Oracle® Enterprise Pack for Eclipse 11gR1 (11.1.1.7)!
This introduces ADF Faces support for the first time.
Head over to the What's New page for more information:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/eclipse/overview/whatsnew-089747.html

I imagine WLS Tools is similar to these plugins in purpose, but I have not used these plugins myself so I do not know for sure. Unlike these older plugins, WLS Tools is based on Eclipse Web Tools Platform and the code base for what makes up WLS Tools originates from BEA Workshop for WebLogic product.
Really, the key to using WLS Tools is getting familiar with Eclipse Web Tools Platform (WTP). Most of the following resources will be framed in terms of deploying to Tomcat. You can just use WLS instead of Tomcat where referenced in the articles and tutorials.
General information about Eclipse Web Tools Platform (WTP)
http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/
Links to books and articles about WTP
http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/community/communityresources.php
Web Application Development User Guide
* find this by going to help content in your Eclipse installation
Hope this helps,
Konstantin
BEA WebLogic Server Tools Team

[svn:fx-trunk] 7825: Updating sample Java formatter for Eclipse projects to stop reformatting method arguments .

Revision: 7825
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-06-13 14:17:47 -0700 (Sat, 13 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
Updating sample Java formatter for Eclipse projects to stop reformatting method arguments.
QA: No
Doc: No
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/development/eclipse/java/formatter.xml

If you're still using Buckminster 3.6, I strongly suggest switching to 3.7 - it has a number of bug fixes and improvements. This applies to both headless, and the IDE (assuming Eclipse 3.7 Indigo).
Matthew

CR for Eclipse Update Released

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for