Crashing LabView SignalExpress 2012 at startup

Hi,
I've just installed NI material (PXI-1033) and software which run normaly with MAX
When I try to run LabView signalexpress 2012 and try to open an example or or create a new project, LaBView begins to load then crashes at initialing Style phase. My OS is XP SP3 French, my PC a DELL Optiplex 790. I have uninstall my antivirus, update windows, installed last patch fp3 LabView 2012, but always the same issue. I send screen shot and windows event as attached document.
Thank in advance for your help
Attachments:
Crash_LabView_signalExpress2012.zip ‏468 KB

Hello Rhingray,
Have you tried to uninstall Signal Express and to reinstall it ?
By the way have you tried to reinstall .Net Framework 4 ?
Regards,
Mathieu P. | Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
Journées techniques : des fondamentaux aux dernières technologies pour la mesure et le contrôle/comm...

Similar Messages

  • Bind FPGA host reference to type definition in labVIEW 2012 crashes labVIEW

    Hi,
    I am using FPGA target device 5641R and labview FPGA 2012 with 5640R ver 1.7.
    On the configure window of open FPGA VI reference function, choosing the dynmaic mode shows broken arrow when wired to the 5640R configuration VIs (i.e. Configure timebase, Configure ADC default, Configure ADC NCO functions). So i tried the other option which is binding the FPGA host reference to type definition and choose the control from path C:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2012\instr.lib\ni5640R\Configuration\NI-5640R VIs\ni5640R FPGA VI Reference.ctl. But after that when i try to save the VI on which open FPGA VI reference function is placed, labVIEW crashes. I am unable to figure out the reason. Earlier I was working with labVIEW 2011 and it was working fine there. Any suggestions would be highly appretiated. 
    Please see the attached images for more details.
    Thanks
    Attachments:
    1.png ‏33 KB
    2.png ‏71 KB
    3.png ‏40 KB

    Check out this thread.  It looks like someone else ran into a similar issue and made changes that fixed their application.
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/IF-RIO/correct-5640r-template-use-recommendation/td-p/1331918
    Jeff B.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • XYGraph Cursor legend bug instantly crashes LabView 2012

    Hi!
    I am just facing a very annoying bug.
    Please find my example VI attached, I would like to know wheather you can confirm the bug? Run the VI if you wish to see some curve (actually the bug appears even if you do not put any data on the graph, if you do, just the same) and after that try to click on the cursor legend vertical scrollbar to scroll up or down to see the cursor names.
    It instantly crashes my LabView 2012 Full version:  12.0.1f2 (32-bit). This XYGraph always crashes LabView... I cannot go on with my project, now I will just try to bypass the error, I will try to delete the cursors, and add them again...
    Anyhow, very strange and annoying behaviour...
    Anyone could repeat the same bug?
    Thanks for support!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    XYGraph_bug_test1.vi ‏149 KB

    hello,
    please find attached my example VI, where I would like to programmatically set the label position of a cursor. Why my code does create at every run a new cursor with the same name?
    thanks!
    Attachments:
    cursor_offset_label_via_propertynode.vi ‏12 KB

  • Multimètre numérique compatible avec Labview SignalExpress.

    Bonjour,
    Je suis à la recherche d'un mutlimètre numérique compatible avec Labview. Je viens de trouver un multimètre qui est comptible avec le logiciel LabVIEW SignalExpress et possédant un port RS232 (Tektronix DMM4020).
    Je me demande si ce multimètre peut être utilisé avec le logiciel Labview? (sachant qu'il n'a pas de port GPIB)
    Merci d'avance pour vos réponses.
    Jérémy

    Bonjour,
    Merci d'avoir posté sur le forum NI.
    Vous trouverez à ce lien le driver permettant de connecter votre multimètre et LabVIEW.
    Je vous conseille quand même de télécharger ce driver depuis LabVIEW (Ecran d'accueil de LV >> Rechercher des drivers d'instruments...) en entrant le nom de votre multimetre dans le champ prévu à cet effet.
    Passer par LV vous permettra d'instaler directement la palette correspondant à votre instrument.
    Cordialement,
    Nicolas M.
    National Instruments France
    #adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
    Journées Techniques LabVIEW 2012 : du 27 septembre au 22 novembre
    2 sessions en parallèle : Débuter a...

  • Save for previous version 8.5 to 8.2 generates code that crashes Labview (uses classes)

    Hello,
    I'm working on some java style interfaces for labview for hot swapping of instrumentation for design patterns. When I try to port this code, developed on Labview 8.5 back to labview 8.2, the code it generates crashes labview (both 8.5 and 8.2).
    Included is a small snipet of the work that demonstrates this behavior.
    It includes to classes:
    untitledProject1 - the containing project (version 8.5)
    FunctionGeneratorI - Similar to a Java style interface (A class with all Dynamic VI's with no useful functionality)
    FunctionGenerator33220a - An intended implementation of Function generator (only a few functions implemented)
    and a folder "labview8_2Distribution"
    Which contains the port of the 8.5 code to 8.2.
    To recreate the error:
    A.
    1. Open "labview8_2Distribution\Users\Laptop\Desktop\objec​t\Untitled Project 1" (8.2 save)
    2. Verify it crashes labview 8.5 and labview 8.2.
    3. Watch labview crash?
    B.
    1. Open the "Untitled project 1" in the root directory. (Using labview 8.5)
    2. Save the project as a labview 8.2 type.
    3. Try to open the saved version with 8.5 and 8.2.
    4. Watch labview crash?
    Greg Sonnenfeld
    Attachments:
    error.zip ‏885 KB

    Hello Karunya,
    In regards to your questions:
    >Can you post your code? Have you tested this by creating another project?
    Do you have an xcontrols in your projects? Do you have typedefs? Do you
    have a LVOOP constant on your block diagram? Are you also using Classes?
    I cannot post the cost as it is way too big. Not really my code but a spaghetti code from a previous programmer. I think problems saving it to a previous version have to do with a few things:
    1) Memory - I have 1 GB of RAM and I am running XP. I notice the available RAM dropping quickly as it is saving and then it blow up.
    2) Long Filenames - The directory path of the original file is incorporated into the saved "previous version" of the code. While a good design, it does make the file/path a bit longer when saving
    3) One of teh things it saves is the drivers and their menus. This is due to the drivers being in a subdirectory of the original code and not in the c:\program files\national instruments\labview 8.5\instr.lib directory. I saw this when I tried to save the file as an LLB.
    4) If I work with smaller parts of the code without long paths, it saves fine.
    There probably are xcontrols, definitely typedefs, no LVOOP's or Classes. Hope you can do something with all this. It just seems that converting to a later version of the code should be reversable. Thanks.
    Michael

  • Passing control reference to subVI crashes labview

    Hi,
    using a image control (as indicator) provided by imaq Vision, I tried to pass the reference of the control to a subVI. On a computer it works and on a other (same labview version, same vision version, same os, same hardware and hardware drivers!), this crashes labview. I tried to close the control refnum at the end of the subVI, but that changed nothing to the issue. Now I use the reference as a global variable and it seems to work...nevertheless, I would like to understand what the issue and if I should remove any passing to subVI of control ref because this can potentially triggers an error. My correlated question is if this global passing is a "fake" workaround or have real chance of improving (this before going through the whole code for changing all passing of reference to subVI)
    thanks a lot

    Hi,
    thank CoastalMaineBird for your answer
    How do you know it's this issue which causes the crash?
    When I remove this parameter from and the only property node in the subVi that write to it, I have no longer any problem. Moreover, to ensure that's really the "passing", and made a global variable containing the reference to this control and use my original SubVi that do access the control through its reference number
    , and it works! In this last exemple, the only change is the way of transmitting the reference
    What LabVIEW version?
    8.0.1
    up to date according Measurement & Automation update tool
    Given that one computer works OK, and another crashes, I would say that
    you are seeing the effect of something else, not the cause. If passing
    a control ref via terminals was fatal, it would be fatal all the time.
    You have some other sort of issue, perhaps timing of the different
    machines triggers the bug, perhaps running out of memory, perhaps
    LabVIEW is corrupted on one machine.... But I don't think changing all
    your code to use globals would solve the real problem. Actually, saying that I wonder about problem of synchronisation. I know from Visual C++ that this kind of error happens if two process try to access the same control at the same time. This is typically an error changing from a computer to an other, and mutex or semaphore are the way to deal nicely with that. But does labview contains already such a securisation? If so, the global variable point on a single object and can "fell" the semaphore/mutex. But passing make a copy that will likely have two different semaphore/mutex but will point to a single control! Do someone know if I'm wrong in this idea or not?
    Thanks

  • Auto cleanup crashes LabVIEW (and VI isn't even that large)

    Hi,
    I'm trying to cleanup a VI, and whenever I hit auto cleanup LabVIEW crashes and when retsrated it doesn't even say it previously crashed. I narrowed down the problem location to a for loop. The wierd thing is that I went through all the wires and objects within the loop and did auto cleanup on them but it doesn't crash. So why when I do it on all combined does it crash?
    I wrote a comment in the loop that crashes to show which on it is.
    I'm on Windows 7 LabVIEW 2010.0f2 32bit
    I did see this posting http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/599FB39777B​DB12486257514005B7293, but even when doing it manually as suggested it still crashes.
    Thanks,
    Matt
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    Score Videos temp.vi ‏126 KB

    This crash corresponds to a known issue in LabVIEW (CAR #298911), which has been fixed in the forthcoming LabVIEW 2011 release. I have attached a copy of your cleaned up VI from 2011, saved for 2010. You might try to copy the block diagram into a new VI and see if that still crashes LabVIEW, but otherwise an upgrade to 2011 when it's available should clear up the problem. Hope that helps.
    John B.
    Embedded Networks R&D
    National Instruments
    Certified LabVIEW Developer
    Attachments:
    Score Videos temp-1.vi ‏104 KB

  • Internet Toolkit for G5.0 crashes Labview 8.2 during Mass Compile

    I have just received my Labview 8.2 update and installed it my system along with all my toolkits. When I tried to Mass Compile Labview 8.2 directory I found that it would crash labview consistantly as shown in the attached image.
    I traced this to the vi's supplied with the Internet Toolkit for G5.0.
    The workaround is ...
    1. Re-installed the Internet Toolkit for G5.0 into Labview 8.2
    2. Mass Compiled ...\project\_config\authcfg.llb using Labview 8.0
    3. Mass Compiled ...\project\_config\authcfg.llb using Labview 8.2
    and there wasn't any more Labview 8.2 crashes during mass compile. As Labview 8.0 was able to mass compile the internet toolkit vi's without crashing I am suspicious that Labview 8.2 might not be completely compatible with Labview 5.0.
    I posted this just in case anyone else sees a similiar issue.
    David
    Attachments:
    Labview 8.2 Mass Compile Crash with Internet Toolkit.png ‏34 KB

    David,
    I was able to reproduce the crash mass compiling authcfg.llb or just trying to open the VI named 'Directory Configuration'.  That code is saved in LabVIEW 5.0.1 and must have something that LabVIEW 8.2 chokes on, I'll have to get someone to investigate it.  Your workaround of saving that .llb or even that one VI in 8.0 first (or probably even 7.x) is the only way I see around it with 8.2.
    I do want to mention that in Q1 2004 we released version 6.0 of the Internet Toolkit and it does not exhibit this behavior.  So the official solution for this crash is to upgrade to the latest Internet Toolkit.
    Kennon

  • Simple Math VI crashes LabVIEW 2009 SP1

    Hi,
    We previously filed a related issue, (ref #: 7302858). The last problem was resolved by 
    Andy Hertzka from NI re-compiled the VI and send it back to us. That re-compilation solved the LabVIEW crashing.
    However, the interesting crash happens again.
    I attached a working VI before the change and a non working VI after the change and save. All the change I applied to the VI is
    1. Add the "Word bits" as a connector on the diagram
    2. Save it Then the VI begin to crash LabVIEW 2009 SP1.
    Before the change, the VI was functioning all right.
    Any idea why this might be happening? Can you try to recompile the non_working version and send it back to me for a try?
    Thanks,
    Tian
    Attachments:
    Non_working_AfterChange_RECOMPILED LRSample_U32in_U32output.vi ‏110 KB
    Working_B4Change_RECOMPILED LRSample_U32in_U32output.vi ‏110 KB

    Tian,
    Like Andy I was unable to see why this code is unstable on your machine. I am able to run the code fine on my computer without any problems. Looking at the code on the block diagram I do not see any major "crash worthy" issues with it. 
    I have resaved the VIs like Andy had in order to fix your issue. By the way what OS are you using, windows 7? It might be helpful to save the log file for the LabVIEW crash. You should get this option when LabVIEW is restarted. 
    <Joel Khan | Applications Engineering | National Instruments | Rice University BSEE> 
    Attachments:
    Non_working_AfterChange_RECOMPILED LRSample_U32in_U32output1.vi ‏108 KB
    Working_B4Change_RECOMPILED LRSample_U32in_U32output1.vi ‏108 KB

  • Moving Averages in Labview SignalExpress

    Hi everyone,
    I am measuring power consumption values from a PC system at 25k samples/sec and looking for a way to calculate the 1-sec and 5-sec moving averages via Labview SignalExpress (Unfortunately I don't have Labview to custom-implement this). One person suggested using FIR low pass filter instead, but I am not quite sure what values I need to set for "number of taps" and "cutoff frequency" values to have it act like a 1-second and 5-second moving average. Any suggestions here?
    Also, does anyone have a .VI from Labview for a moving average functionality, which I can use in my Labview SignalExpress setup?
    Thanks,
    --Serhan 

    Serhan,
    If you are just aiming to smooth out your signal and reduce noise, than an FIR filter would work fine, but it sounds like you are trying to achieve an exact moving average.  Unfortunately, there are entire textbooks on filter design and getting the filter to accomplish that with great accuracy would be a feat.  It is true that the moving average is a form of the FIR filter.
    I had some old code that took the running average of 100 samples in SE, but I'll have to look for it when I get to work tomorrow.  I'll post again when Ifind it.
    I don't have any moving average VI's handy, but that would probably be the easiest way to accomplish this. Maybe someone can distribute their VI to Serhan?
    Rob K
    Measurements Mechanical Engineer (C-Series, USB X-Series)
    National Instruments
    CompactRIO Developers Guide
    CompactRIO Out of the Box Video

  • What kind of FIR filter in Labview SignalExpress Tektronix Edition?

    I am using FIR filter in Labview SignalExpress Tektronix Edition to process signal acquired from the TDS3032B.But i dont know what kind of this filter(Window,least-squares,or equiripple...).Does any one know about this?

    Check out some of NIs links:
    Virtual Instrumentation Empowers Digital Signal Processing Design
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4759
    Designing Filters Using the NI LabVIEW Digital Filter Design Toolkit
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3237
    lots of information about different FIR can be found by searching on google as well.
    National Instruments

  • Crash LabVIEW in one click

    The buggiest LabVIEW ever (8.6.1f1) keeps on giving:
    WARNING: will crash LabVIEW and you will lose any unsaved work. 
     Open the INFO CLUSTER ctl in the attached LLB (28kB).
    (Yes, I know it's ugly, I'm trying to work on it)
    Right-click on the table.
    Watch LabVIEW die.
    Arrrgh. 
    Steve Bird
    Culverson Software - Elegant software that is a pleasure to use.
    Culverson.com
    Blog for (mostly LabVIEW) programmers: Tips And Tricks
    Attachments:
    Crash-o-matic.llb ‏28 KB

    Yes, I know about the overlap stuff.
    Like I said, I was working on it and re-arranging stuff on the page when I discovered the bug.
    Actually, I worked around it like this:
    Copied the MCListBox to a blank VI.
    Created a generic property node.
    Linked the property node to the MCListBox.
    Set the AUTOSIZE ROW height false
    Set all the row heights to 23 instead of 25.
    Pasted the copy in place of the original in the control I was working on. 
    That's what I wanted to do via dialogs, but crashed instead.
    Thanks for your offer, though. 
    Steve Bird
    Culverson Software - Elegant software that is a pleasure to use.
    Culverson.com
    Blog for (mostly LabVIEW) programmers: Tips And Tricks

  • Bug: Windows 7 DLL call to turn off monitor message crashes LabVIEW 10.0f2

    Hi,
    I wanted to log this bug on the forum. I have already logged this with NI UK Support: CAR# 286873
    I was trying to find a way to turn off a laptop lcd
    monitor during measurements. I was trying to replicate this
    http://codereflect.com/2009/04/03/how-to-programmatically-turn-onoff-your-monitor/
    which uses windows messaging.
    I found the attached Monitor-1.vi somewhere on the forum that seems to do the above.
    However when I run the VI it crashes LabVIEW 10.f2 on Windows 7 32-bit.
    cheers
    David
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    Monitor-1.vi ‏13 KB

    Hi Cosmin,
    That was it! Thank you so much!
    I will let NI UK support that you identified the issue and get them to close the CAR.
    cheers
    David
    Attachments:
    Turn off Monitor.vi ‏12 KB

  • Labview SignalExpress (2.0) Dual-core capable?

    I've read that the full-blown Labview is fully multithreaded and can take full advantage of multicore, can SignalExpress?  The machine I am evaluating on is a rather aged P4 (2.0 GHz I believe) and I'm finding my task to be rather CPU intensive, so I will probably put SignalExpress on a Core2 Duo machine if we purchase the package.

    Yes, because LabVIEW SignalExpress is built on the same LabVIEW technology, all of your projects automatically take advantage of muticore architectures.  
    Regards,
    Matt F
    Keep up to date on the latest PXI news at twitter.com/pxi

  • LabVIEW SignalExpress overload indication

    I was just wondering if LabVIEW SignalExpress 2010 had an overload indication/rejection feature, and if so where I could find it. I am currently using a PXI-4462 card with the trial version of SignalExpress.
    Thanks,
    Greg

    Please post to the SignalExpress board. Very few users of it here. You might want to also explain what you want to give an overload indication of.

Maybe you are looking for