Crazy File Sizes - Help!

Hello,
I have a multi-part question about multi-page PDFs.  Two things are happening to me quite a lot with Acrobat and PDF creation, and I need some help figuring out what's going on.
Thing 1:
I will receive a bunch of scanned music, each page scanned separately as a separate PDF ... and each one sent in its own separate email, resulting in 30-40 emails at a time ... from another user.  Each PDF page that gets sent to me tends to be somewhere around 500K.  My task is to use Acrobat to combine the incoming scans into a multi-page PDF.  The actual creation of the multi-part PDF is no problem.  Getting Started > Combine Files into PDF is a straightforward move, and that's what I do.  But the resulting multi-page PDF is HUGE.  I've tried optimizing, I've tried saving it as a Small PDF ... neither of those things do much at all.  I'm seeing file sizes around 5,000K by the time I'm done with an average-sized multi-page instrumental part (about 5-6 pages of music). 
A big file size isn't necessarily a big deal, but I have to distribute these multi-pagers via email (that is the only electronic format that doesn't feel like alien technology to the people on the distribution list) and sending these big files in emails tends to be problematic.  Slow downloads, file size limits exceeded, etc. ... this big file size thing is really annoying. 
I suspect the massive file size is caused by how the initial user scanned in the pages of music, but I can't control what the initial user does; I just have to work with what arrives.  Is there any way that I can fix this?
Thing 2:
I noticed that when I used the basic set-up at Fedex/Kinkos and, using a scanner and Acrobat, scanned 8.5 x 11 copies of some music as a black and white document, combining my scans into one PDF as I went and optimizing them, a file that would have been around 6,000 K coming from the other initial user and being paged together by me ended up being 568 K using this method.
When I used my camera as a impromptu scanner and used the CamScan application to take a picture of a document and save it as a PDF, I was getting pretty ridiculous file sizes, 400-500 K a page.  Sam issue as with the PDFs coming from the initial user.
What is going on?  Is there something in the scanning method that affects how big the file is?  Is a flatbed scanner and Acrobat the only way to get small PDF sizes?
Thanks for any help you can provide...

yes it dus thanx so much.. man i dont no y i didnt see that in the first place :p i must be blind

Similar Messages

  • Export file size help...output seems way too big

    I have a 12 minute movie with audio, video and stills in it.
    Currently when I export it the file is 865MB...  I need it to be less than 100 with decent quality.  It is a tutorial video that will be downloaded from the web.
    Can you please give me some direction on how to do this?  On what variables to change etc.  I know if I exported this out of Camtasia Studio, it would be around that 100 or less bench mark .... problem is I don't know what the settings for the Camtasia preset are.
    I am using the following setup:
    Quicktime Format
    Summary:
    Output:
    1400x790, 15(fps), quality 100
    48000 Hz, Stero, 16 bit
    H.264
    Source:
    Sequece, 01-OverviewSWKit
    1920x1080 (1.0), 24fps, Progressive, 00:12:03:12
    48000 Hz, Stereo
    Settings:
    Video Codec:  H264
    Basica Settings:
    Quality 100
    Width/height (1400 x 790
    Aspect: Square pixels (1.0)
    Render at maximum depth - "UN"-checked
    Depth: 24 bit
    Advanced Settings
    Key Frame every 1 frame - "UN" checked
    Optimize stills - "UN" checked
    Frame Reordering "UN" checked
    Bitrate setting:
    Limit data rate to xxxx  "UN" checked
    Use Maximum Render Quality - "UN" Checked
    Use Previews "UN" Checked
    Use Frame Blending "CHECKED"

    Well, with the Apple H.264 encoder in a QuickTime container, you're a bit limited to the number of things you can tweak to decrease final file size. Using a more advanced H.264 encoder, like the free x264, will give access to many of the more "high-tech" bells and whistles that are part of the H.264 standard. One potential would be to tick the "Key frame every # frame" box and try a few values there, usually at multiples of your frame rate. Key frames are "whole" frames that take up much more space in the final file size, and decrease their frequency might help slightly decrease file size, though it will also affect quality.
    Short of changing the dimensions of your destination video, decreasing the frame rate, or changing the bitrate of the video and audio streams, you will eventually reach a limit of how much you can push one parameter or another. You might try using H.264 in the Format (not codec) dropdown; this will give you a bit more control over encoding to an H.264 MP4 file. Unless you specifically need a QuickTime MOV, you might find you get better results with the H.264 MP4.
    These are of course just the options in Premiere itself. Once you go outside the castle walls, you can find a whole bunch of other options, though they usually come at a steeper learning curve. The big thing to remember is that there is no free lunch when it comes to encoding; you have to give a bit here to gain there, and it's all about setting thresholds of what you're willing to accept.

  • MSI GT60-0NC Paging File Size Help!

    I'm having issues with my laptop (http://www.msi.com/product/nb/GT60-0NC.html#/?div=Overview) after messing with the paging file settings. I'm wondering what the default values are for this particular laptop.
    I'm not sure what it was before I started messing with it, but after I changed it my benchmark for 3d renderings (architectural visualizations done through maxwell render) have dropped more than significantly.
    While rendering, my physical memory usage is about 95%, my CPU usage is only 4% (which should be between 70-90%), and my Disk usage is 100%. Disk usage must be my problem, because when I check the resource monitor my the system is writing about 10,000,000 B/sec to the pagefile, while maxwell is reading about 13,000,000 B/sec from the pagefile. This read / write of the pagefile keeps my disk usage at 100% throughout the render.
    If I allow windows to "automatically manage the paging file size for all drives," it allocates 12288 to drive C: (OS) and none to the other drive in the RAID. Displayed at the bottom is "Minimum allowed: 16 MB; Recommended: 5107 MB; Currently allocated: 12288 MB"
    What started the problem is when I went to manually manage the pagefile myself, and moved the paging file to the other RAID drive (D:), and ever since I haven't been able to render properly. I'm trying to isolate my problem, and this is the only significant change I made to this system since it was able to render correctly, other than removing it's ability to hibernate.
    Anyone have any advice? My first step was to allow windows to automatically control the pagefile again, and its back on the C drive, but the problem still persists. I also did a system restore to a date before I made these changes, and that didn't help either.
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    Quote from: thaBadfish on 05-January-13, 03:22:34
    Thanks for the response.
    Both drives in my raid are HDD, and are set to defragment weekly. Defragmenter says it was last run today, and they are both 0% fragmented.
    Update:
    My issue ended up being a corrupt scene file (for the rendering program), which once I rewrote the scene the problem has disappeared. Disk usage is back to very low, and CPU usage is back to 100% where it should be during a rendering. Slowdown was associated with the corrupt file causing me to hit the limit of my physical memory, which caused the major slowdown in reading/writing massive amounts of overflow to the pagefile.
    That's great. Atleast you know what the problem was and know how to solve it next time! 

  • Reducing video file size - help!

    Hi all,
    I've produced an 11min film for my company which has come out at 150mb when converted from F4V to WMV format (which is the format our SharePoint system prefers). However, it's too bit!
    So the question is, what can I do when exporting the video from Premiere Pro to ensure it's as small as possible? Adjust the format? Bit rates? etc etc. The frame width has already been reduced to 640 x 340 pixels. I've looked at other posts, but each question is so different.
    Apologies, I'm stil so new to all this and I'm sure I'm asking the most basic questions.
    Thanks all
    Ashley

    There are only two things that effect file size, bitrate and duration.  Format, resolution, frame rate, etc. won't have any effect.
    And this makes sense if you think about it.  Files are measured in bits, so...bits per second x number of seconds = file size.  Whether 1920 x 1080 or 640 x 360, it's still bits per second x number of seconds.

  • JPEG File Size Help!

    Any tips (or software) on how to reduce the file size of
    JPEGs without compromising the quality. I have a flash ad that has
    3 screens with photos, but clients needs the .swf file to be under
    20K. I can only get it down to 28K.
    I've done the following:
    * cropped photo down to actual size
    * used "Save for Web" function in Photoshop
    Any thing else I can do???
    TIA!

    There is a flyout option in the PS Save for Web dialogue (top right)
    it allows you to Optimize to File Size
    I'd be looking at that 1st
    hope this helps

  • Reduce File Size Help

    Hi
    Would any experts out there know how to adjust the default setting of "Reduce File Size" function? I thought it was linked to the default Colorsync "Reduce File Size" Quartz Filter but I found that changing that filter only effect Save As PDF functions.
    I've been googling around without much luck.
    Thanks in advance.
    John

    Peter is right. If you want to reduce the size of a PDF you can use ColorSync to create a PDF setting that reduces the quality (and thusly the file size) of the pictures in your document. In fact, Apple's already done this for us - Pages has 3 PDF export choices. But this has nothing to do with the file size of the Pages document itself. Your best bet is to use photo editing software to crop and resize the photo before you put it into the Pages document.

  • I need to export a photo at around 1meg file size,and dont seem to be able to do it in the presets can anyone help please ,I shoot on a canon 5d

    I need to export a photo at around 1meg file size,and dont seem to be able to do it in the presets can anyone help please ,I shoot on a canon 5d

    I believe Frank is referring to the end use (e.g., for print or on-screen use).
    Until he returns, I can tell you that I ran a quick test using an image from the Aperture 3 training book library which was as follows:
    Camera = Canon EOS 5D Mark II
    Master resolution = 5616 x 3744 (21 MP)
    I was able to export to a JPEG with end file size of 1 MB as follows:
    Export Presets drop-down > select 'Edit' option
    Selected preset name 'JPEG - 50% of Original Size' > change percentage value to 40% > change DPI value to '300' > click OK to set as current default > Export version to desktop.
    The exported JPEG has a resolution of 2246 x 1498 and appears on screen to have the same image quality of the original in Aperture.
    Note - I did not change the default Image Quality slider in the Export Preset dialog (which left it at 10).
    Basically, you will need to play around with the settings until you find the appropriate values to arrive at an image version you want.

  • Adobe Media Encoder - File Size HUGE. HELP

    I have a MPG that is 216mb. When I attempt to use Media Encoder 5 or 5.5 the estimated file size for a 640 x 480 f4v is 26456mb.
    I have used the computer at my school with the same file and the file size is 2mb. What am I doing wrong at home? I can't image encoder can make a 216mb file become 2.6 gb.
    Please help.
    Howard

    Please drop the source clip into MediaInfo and check what it says the duration is. (If you don't have MediaInfo, you can download it for free from the Internet.) If possible, please post a link to the clip so that we can download it and check it out for ourselves.
    Two details catch my eye in the Source Summary. Both screenshots show that the field order is Unknown and that the clip has no audio. I doubt either of those details accounts for the incorrect duration, but the unknown field order, at least, makes me wonder whether AME is having trouble interpretting the footage correctly. I suggest going to the Interpret Footage dialog (right-click on the clip in AME's queue and select Interpret Footage), and setting the Field Order to the correct value [Upper Field First, Lower Field First, or No Fields (Progressive Scan)]. While you're there, check whether the frame rate is accurate--according to the screenshot, it's 30.000 fps. Is that accurate?

  • Help me reduce VHD file size when deleting data in OS.

    I use Hyper-V on Server 2008 64bit installation to create a CentOS 5.8 VPS has the capacity 100GB. After a period of use of disk space used up nearly all 100GB. I have deleted a VPS data in this section but I checked VHD file size not reduced. 
    The way you can help me do this? I thank

    Well if it was a Dynamic VHD(x) to begin with, you have just expanded it out to its maximum.  In order to reduce its size, which is different that actually shrinking the partition and VHD(x) structure, here is what you can do.  
    If this was a Windows box I would have tell you to defrag inside the VM, shut it down and then use the tool from within Hyper-V Manager to Compact the VHD(x) file.
    You could try the Compact against the your CentOS VM and see how much it does decrease the VHD(x) drive.  
    Without a good ext3 file reorg utility out there, you may not get down to the smallest possible size.  You could always backup the VHD(x) file and restore it to another VHD(x) and swap the drives out.  This laying down of the files from backup
    would make them contiguous again and reduce your over all size of the VHD(x) file. That seems like a lot of work, but would meet your goal.  I would try the Compact option first with the VM off to see what gets reclaimed.
    Rob McShinsky (www.VirtuallyAware.com)
    VirtuallyAware - Experiences in a Virtual World (Microsoft MVP - Virtual Machine)

  • I need to compress an InDesign file to web-quality pdf but file size is still too big. Help!

    I need to compress an InDesign file to web-quality pdf but file size is still too big. Help!

    Hi Bill,
    It sounds like your document has a lot of pages and/or images in it.
    Instead of using the normal InDesign > Export command to create a PDF, you may be able to reduce the file size by printing to a PostScript file, then distilling it to PDF using Acrobat Distiller.

  • Need help shrinking iPhone video file sizes.

    Thanks in advance, folks!
    I just recently bought an iPhone 4 and I love it. The only is, despite the phone recording in HD, the file sizes are huge. Even using the SD vga camera in the front, 2 and a half minutes equals 45MB.
    Is there anything I can do in iTunes, or the phone itself to change the quality and reduce the file size? If not, is there a program I can use to do this?
    I have searched all over the internet and haven't found any info. I really hope you guys can help me out. Again, thanks!

    Pls change the file extension to the format in which the file was recorded for eg : .mp4, .3gp, .avi. Check first in which format ur phone records a video file and apply a similar extension do dat fill, revert if any query.

  • Help with compress function--file sizes not substantially reduced

    I've tried to use the compress function (right click "compress" or Finder/File/Compress) a few times on files from a variety of different programs. While this results in creating a zip file, the file size is not substantially reduced (e.g., from 43.4 MB to 42.9 MB). Is there a way to change how much a file is compressed?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Eric

    Not all material is very compressible. Text files and word processor documents usually compress very well. Photos and movies don't compress much if at all due to the nature of their structure (in some cases, using a general-purpose compressor can actually make a file larger). So it will depend on what it is you're compressing.

  • Need help reducing file size.

    We're using Acrobat 8 Standard and are able to reduce an 8 MB file down to 7 MB but a fellow employee with Acrobat 9 Pro was able to reduce the size of the same file to 1.8 MB. We're doing the same function (Reduce File Size) in both apps so we're not sure why there's such a big difference in finished file sizes between the two programs. Is there a setting in Acrobat 8 Stnd that we're missing to be able to drop the file size much closer to what Acrobat 9 Pro can achieve?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you!

    There are a lot of factors that can affect file size. PDF Optimize allows you more control over those options that does the Reduce File Size. With PDF Optimize, you can do an audit of the PDF to see what is taking up a lot of the size. Things that can affect the size include:
    1. Image resolution (PDF Optimize can reduce)
    2. Embedded fonts (subset fonts recommended to reduce size - leaving the fonts out is not a good idea)
    - Other?
    That may help some. When you compare how different machines or versions of Acrobat do the file reduction, you need to simply review all of the options that are being used. Sometimes, you can get a reduction by reprinting to a new PDF, but that is not a perfect process either.

  • Help!..CS4 IS INCREASING FILE SIZES.

    Hi all
    Wondered if anyone has had a problem with increased files sizes when opening a document up in Photoshop? Anything i open up is increased by two thirds  in file size and i've no idea why ( e.g..8MB doc opens as 24MB doc)
    What is even more strange is that it won't let me reduce a  file size to anything under 1MB.
    Has anyone ever come across this problem?...would appreciate any help.
    Thanks
    Bri

    Hey Noel
    Fair Play.
    This is what is happening.
    I’ve got a standard JPEG file that viewed in Explorer and Bridge reads as a 2.70MB (2838,796 bytes) file. Pixel dimensions 797x1000. Document size  6.75 x 8.47cm .Res 300 PPI.
    When I open it in CS4 it reads 2.28MB. (This is the first thing I don’t understand)
    Either way my simple( so I thought ) objective is to decrease the file size.
    In the image size box I have re-set the resolution to 72ppi as I just need to post the image on a Website. My before and after calculations in the image Panel reads (was 2.28MB...now 134.3k)
    Great! .this is what I want, However..... when I ‘save as’ and the JPEG compression box appears it has suddenly increased the file to 1.8MB Large file...and only allows me to reduce it to 1.7MB small file.
    Admittedly this is not my area of expertise....I’m doing something wrong so any pointers would be much appreciated.
    Bri

  • Aperture help/questions - File Size, Versions, etc

    Hi,
    I am new to the Mac, and after a small learning curve am now loving it. Can’t believe what I missed all those years under Windows. Anyway one of my biggest problems has been workflow and photo management, so I rushed out and bought Aperture without much investigation. I’m still getting to know it, and so far think it’s very good except for the following points, which may be down to my inexperience with the product rather than any shortcomings. I store all my shots as managed files in my Aperture library.
    1. File sizes. Often I use Photoshop for minor/major modifications. There would be few shots that would not require some tweaking if I wanted to get the best image. I have PS3 set up as my external editor. My problem is the huge file size generated after using PS. For example my master file may be around 3mb (jpeg) but my PS file is 45mb! Now if I have a few versions of the PS file, as often is the case, I go from a few megabytes of storage for the image to a few hundred megabytes of storage!! Is there a way around this ??
    What’s more if I create a Duplicate Version of the PSD version and do NOTHING it grows again. For example my initial JPEG is 2.78mb, I creat a new version via PS and add some adjustment layers and save the new version back. This new version has now grown to 45.56mb. I then wish to make another different version based on my previous version so I first select the version1 and then Duplicate Version. Now before I do ANYTHING if I save it back I get a new version with a file size of 68.49mb!!! If I do this again, my next version is hasn’t grown in size again, it’s still 68.49mb. What gives ??
    2. Per 1) above can I save back from PS in JPEG and not PSD to bring the file size down. That is open the file in PS via the external editor in Aperture, make some adjustments and save it back as a new version in JPEG ??
    3. Related to 2) above I often want to have multiple PS versions. For example the first one may just have some USM added. Subsequent ones however may have different crops, tonings, etc. So in Aperture what I do is create my first version and add the USM and whatever other standard treatments. Then save this. Then create a duplicate of this version and open the duplicate in PS via the external editor in Aperture. Make some changes then save back. Only now I have 4 files – the original, my version 1, the duplicate of this and my new version based on the duplicate. So I must now delete the duplicate (file three) version . Is there a better way ??
    4. I find it hard sometimes to tell if I am on a master file or a version. Is there a way to definitely tell ? For example on occasion I have gone to delete a version, I get the dialog warning that all versions and masters will be deleted and then I seem to have lost both the version AND the master ?? This seems a bit dangerous.
    5. The vault seems very slow to update when minor changes have been made. For example I created a new version of a master with a minor modification performed in Aperture (saturation set to zero) and then updated my vault. This should be a very quick process as the new version really just consists of some modification information and not the whole file. The update takes as long as if I were to add a few hundred megs of new photo’s to the library ! Is it overwriting the whole vault again, or is it just updating the changes (as I assume it should)
    Sorry for the long winded explanations. Any advice/help/thoughts are much appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Simon
    imac24   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    Hello, Simon
    quote: "I am new to the Mac, and after a small learning curve am now loving it."
    It only gets better
    Welcome to the forum and macs!
    quote: "My problem is the huge file size generated after using PS. For example my master file may be around 3mb (jpeg) but my PS file is 45mb! Now if I have a few versions of the PS file"
    Check your Export Image settings like quality, size, DPI. Prior to Open with External Editor make the photograph as best as possible, all adjustments, crop, etc and then take it to Photoshop, back to Aperture and print it or upload to web etc. If the photograph is being used on the web there is no need to make a huge file
    quote: "above can I save back from PS in JPEG and not PSD to bring the file size down"
    You might think about keeping the jpegs jpeg on the export from Aperture to PS instead of jpeg to psd to jpeg.
    4. quote: "I find it hard sometimes to tell if I am on a master file or a version. Is there a way to definitely tell ?"
    the "m" key toggles from Master to Version (adjusted).
    5. quote: "The vault seems very slow to update when minor changes have been made."
    this is contingent on the system like rpms, processor, usb or fw...
    victor

Maybe you are looking for

  • Two instances/one running at a time with sae set of data files

    hi, I dont want to use OPS or Clustering... I want two diffrent instances ... with only one running at a time.... When one will be down second will be manually started// Only requirement is that the set of datafiles must be same......... Is this poss

  • ALV Grid in back ground

    Hi friends,  i got some problem in alv grid while i am running it in back ground.   my report contains some currency(amount)  field in out put. when i am removing the amount field it is good result in back ground. but when it consist of amount field

  • EMAIL ADAPTER :Issue

    The scenario is from IDOC-MAIL with no repository objets and no mapping .The  outgoing message is email. Msg protocoll is XIALL without mailpackage .The mail adapter sends an email and generates an attachment file which contains the IDoc message.The

  • Automated Process

    Hi Experts, We created one Enterprise Service and tested in ws navigator it is working fine. Now in BPM Process we created one automated activity and assign that service and i set all the initial values.When i build and deployed application successfu

  • HT4913 can i add two iphones to itunes match

    my wife and i both have iphones and want to share all of our music using the itune match. can i associate both phones to the account?