Create an Event log entry in Event Viewer in Windows 7, when processor exceeds a set percentage of usage

Hi, I am trying to create an Event log entry in Event viewer in Windows 7 when the processor exceeds a set percentage of usage. I have unsuccessfully tried doing this through a Data Collection Set in the User Defined folder to monitor CPU usage
and to trigger an Alert and log an entry when the CPU exceeds a set percentage of usage.  Any suggestions, and please if possible keep them simple and easy to follow, I am not to familar with Windows 7.  

Hi, I am trying to create an Event log entry in Event viewer in Windows 7 when the processor exceeds a set percentage of usage. I have unsuccessfully tried doing this through a Data Collection Set in the User Defined folder to monitor CPU usage
and to trigger an Alert and log an entry when the CPU exceeds a set percentage of usage.  Any suggestions, and please if possible keep them simple and easy to follow, I am not to familar with Windows 7.  

Similar Messages

  • Event log entries missing in PoSh but visible in Eventvwr

    Hi,
    I've noticed the following issue on about 10 out of 2500 computers which run a script on our domain, so its minor, but I'd like to understand why its happening.
    When I query the event log using the eventvwr GUI I can filter on event ID 7001 and all the events list fine. However when I run 'get-eventlog -logname system -instanceid 7001' it shows all the events except the last 3 or so most recent ones (which are visible
    in the GUI).
    I've cross referenced this with an event visible in the GUI that had an EventRecordID of 32029. But when querying this via PowerShell 'get-eventlog -logname system -index 32029' it returns 'no matches found'.
    Its a weird problem, because if I was to query to logs in a few hours time after a few more people have logged on/off the computer then the event would show in PowerShell, but the new most recent ones wouldn't.
    Is there a caching mechanism at work, and if so how could I disable it? Its interesting that these machines are all built from the same WDS image with the same GPO's applied but only a very small percentage exhibit this issue, all other machines show recent
    event logs in PowerShell instantly.
    I should also mention that these are all Windows 7 x64 computers.
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Phil

    Hi,
    Based on my understanding, only some of your computers have this issue. And when use WMI, we could query all of the events, but when use powershell command, some logs are missing.
    I would like to know that when we use 'get-eventlog -logname system -instanceid 7001| out-file c:\result.txt', how many logs are there?
    What I think it may caused by there are so many logs information, and could not be dispalyed out. We may try some other logs also.
    Regards,
    Yan Li
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are
    TechNet Subscription
    user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
    here.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Large number of event Log entries: connection open...

    Hi,
    I am seeing a large number of entries in the event log of the type:
    21:49:17, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [81.154.101.160:51163] CLOSED/TIME_WAIT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:49:15, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [81.154.101.160:41820] ppp0 NAPT)
    Are these anything I should be concerned about? I have tried a couple of forum and Google searches, but I don't quite know where to start beyond pasting the first bit of the message. I haven't found anything obvious from those searches.
    DHCP table lists 192.168.1.78 as the desktop PC on which I'm writing this.
    Please could you point me in the direction of any resources that will help me to work out if I should be worried about this?
    A slightly longer extract is shown below:
    21:49:17, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [81.154.101.160:51163] CLOSED/TIME_WAIT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:49:15, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [81.154.101.160:41820] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:49:15, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [81.154.101.160:51163] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:49:11, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [213.205.231.156:51027] TIME_WAIT/CLOSED ppp0 NAPT)
    21:49:03, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [178.190.63.75:55535] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:49:00, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [2.96.4.85:23939] TIME_WAIT/CLOSED ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:59, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [78.144.143.222:21617] CLOSED/TIME_WAIT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:58, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [41.218.222.34:28188] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:57, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [41.218.222.34:28288] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:57, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [86.132.123.255:18048] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:57, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [86.132.123.255:54199] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:55, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [86.144.91.49:60704] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:55, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [80.3.100.12:50875] TIME_WAIT/CLOSED ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:45, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [78.150.251.216:57656] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:39, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [78.150.251.216:56975] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:29, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [79.99.145.46:8368] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:27, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [90.192.249.173:45250] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:16, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [212.17.96.246:62447] ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:10, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [82.16.198.117:49942] TIME_WAIT/CLOSED ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:08, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [213.205.231.156:51027] CLOSED/SYN_SENT ppp0 NAPT)
    21:48:04, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [57] Connection closed (Port Forwarding: TCP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [89.153.251.9:53729] TIME_WAIT/CLOSED ppp0 NAPT)
    21:47:54, 11 Mar.
    IN: ACCEPT [54] Connection opened (Port Forwarding: UDP 192.168.1.78:14312 <-->86.128.58.172:14312 [80.3.100.12:37150] ppp0 NAPT)

    Hi,
    Thank you for the response. I think, but can't remember for sure, that UPnP was already switched off when I captured that log. Anyway, even if it wasn't, it is now. So I will see what gets captured in my logs.
    I've just had to restart my Home Hub because of other connection issues and I notice that the first few entries are also odd:
    19:35:16, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49250->173.194.78.125:5222 on ppp0)
    19:34:45, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:34:31, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49250->173.194.78.125:5222 on ppp0)
    19:34:31, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:34:04, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49462->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:46, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49250->173.194.78.125:5222 on ppp0)
    19:33:46, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [12] Spoofing protection (IGMP 86.164.178.188->224.0.0.22 on ppp0)
    19:33:45, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:39, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49462->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:33, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49463->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:29, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (UDP 111.252.36.217:26328->86.164.178.188:12708 on ppp0)
    19:33:16, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 193.113.4.153:80->86.164.178.188:49572 on ppp0)
    19:33:14, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:14, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 66.193.112.93:443->86.164.178.188:44266 on ppp0)
    19:33:14, 12 Mar.
    ( 164.240000) CWMP: session completed successfully
    19:33:13, 12 Mar.
    ( 163.700000) CWMP: HTTP authentication success from https://pbthdm.bt.mo
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 106 more packets (because of Default policy)
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49462->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 213.1.72.209:80->86.164.178.188:49547 on ppp0)
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 94 more packets (because of Default policy)
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 199.59.148.87:443->86.164.178.188:49531 on ppp0)
    19:33:05, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49250->173.194.78.125:5222 on ppp0)
    19:33:04, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:33:04, 12 Mar.
    ( 155.110000) CWMP: Server URL: https://pbthdm.bt.mo; Connecting as user: ACS username
    19:33:04, 12 Mar.
    ( 155.090000) CWMP: Session start now. Event code(s): '1 BOOT,4 VALUE CHANGE'
    19:32:59, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:54, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49462->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:53, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:52, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49463->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:51, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:48, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:47, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49266->173.194.34.101:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:46, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:46, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 4 more packets (because of First packet is Invalid)
    19:32:45, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49461->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:44, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:44, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of First packet is Invalid)
    19:32:43, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49398->193.113.4.153:80 on ppp0)
    19:32:42, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:42, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 3 more packets (because of First packet is Invalid)
    19:32:42, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49277->119.254.30.32:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:41, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:41, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of First packet is Invalid)
    19:32:41, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:38, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49280->119.254.30.32:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:36, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49330->173.194.67.94:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:34, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49463->199.59.149.232:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:30, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 66.193.112.93:443->86.164.178.188:47022 on ppp0)
    19:32:30, 12 Mar.
    ( 120.790000) CWMP: session closed due to error: WGET TLS error
    19:32:30, 12 Mar.
    ( 120.140000) NTP synchronization success!
    19:32:30, 12 Mar.
    BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Default policy)
    19:32:29, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49458->217.41.223.234:80 on ppp0)
    19:32:28, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [65] First packet is Invalid (TCP 192.168.1.78:49280->119.254.30.32:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:26, 12 Mar.
    ( 116.030000) NTP synchronization start
    19:32:25, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (First packet in connection is not a SYN packet: TCP 192.168.1.78:49442->74.125.141.91:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:25, 12 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 192.168.1.78:49310->204.154.94.81:443 on ppp0)
    19:32:25, 12 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP 88.221.94.116:80->86.164.178.188:49863 on ppp0)

  • Since applying Feb 2013 Sharepoint 2010 CUs - Critical event log entries for Blob cache and missing images

    Hi,
    Since applying the February 2013 SharePoint 2010 updates, we are getting lots of entries in our event logs along the following:
    Content Management     Publishing Cache         
    5538     Critical 
    An error occurred in the blob cache.  The exception message was 'The system cannot find the file specified. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070002)’
    In pretty much all of these cases the image/ file in question that is reported in the ULS logs as missing is not actually in the collaboration site, master page / html etc so the fix needs to go back to the site owner to make the correction to avoid
    the 404 (if they make it!). This has only started happening, I believe since feb 2013 sp2010 cumulative updates updates
    I didn’t see this mentioned as a change / in the Fix list of the February updates. i.e. it flags up a critical error in our event logs. So with a lot of sites and a lot of missing images your event log can quickly fill up.
    Obviously you can suppress them in the monitoring -> web content management ->publishing cache = none & none which is not ideal.
    So my question is... are others seeing this and was a change made by Microsoft to flag a 404 missing image / file up a critical error in event log when blob cache is enabled?
    If i log this with MS they will just say, you need to fix it up the missing files in the site but would be nice to know this had changed prior! I also deleted and recreated the blob cache and this made no diffference
    thanks
    Brad

    I'm facing the same error on our SharePoint 2013 farm. We are on Aug 2013 CU and if the Dec CU (which is supposed to be the latest) doesn't solve it then what else could be done.
    Some users started getting the message "Server is busy now try again later" with a corelation id. I looked up ULS with that corelation id and found these two errors in addition to hundreds of "Micro Trace Tags (none)" and "forced
    due to logging gap":
    "GetFileFromUrl: FileNotFoundException when attempting get file Url /favicon.ico The system cannot find the file specified. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070002)"
    "Error in blob cache. System.IO.FileNotFoundException: The system cannot find the file specified. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070002)"
    "Unable to cache URL /FAVICON.ICO.  File was not found" 
    Looks like this is a bug and MS hasn't fixed it in Dec CU..
    &quot;The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of anybody else&quot;

  • HH3A event log entries - firewall

    I have recently received a replacement hub and in the event log am getting loads of the following entries - is this usual (IP address is my laptop)
    23:59:57, 15 May.
    (458348.960000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->49744, internal ports: 49744, internal client: 192.168.1.64
    23:59:16, 15 May.
    (458308.430000) Port forwarding rule added via UPnP. protocol: UDP, external ports: any->49744, internal ports: 49744, internal client: 192.168.1.64
    Also when I do a tracert I get the following as the first line
    1     3 ms     2 ms     1 ms  api.home [192.168.1.254]
    I am only confused because on the old hub the firewall entries were
    20:50:11, 30 Apr.
    BLOCKED 1 more packets (because of Spoofing protection)
    20:50:09, 30 Apr.
    IN: BLOCK [12] Spoofing protection (IGMP 86.157.215.96->224.0.0.22 on ppp0)
    and the tracert was
    1     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  BThomehub.home [192.168.1.254]
    I presume that nothing is amiss
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    conrad wrote:
    Many thanks DS - have turned UPnP off.  
    Why is this comment displayed   "It is recommended to keep the Extended UPnP security enabled to ensure the security of your home network." Presumably not having it enabled is ok.
    The spoofing stuff was obviously caused by me switching between wired/wireless as part of my line problems but thanks for the info as no doubt it will occur again.
    No problem
    The extended UPnP is a new item that BT have added to the latest firmware on the hub3. TBH I've not looked in to what this actually means as I've always turned UPnP off, even from when I was using the HH2.
    The spoofing events will return if you flick between each method of connecting, unless you delete the method not in use
    -+-No longer a forum member-+-

  • Unidentifiable Event log entries..?

    Hi,
    sorry if this is not the right thread-group to post but I'm losing it.
    I keep getting the following event log descriptions for svcListener and svcListener Prof in my Event log. Does anyone know where this comes from?
    svcListener
    The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( svcListener ) cannot be found.
    The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer.
    You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details.
    The following information is part of the event: Cannot perform this operation on a closed dataset.svcListener - Prof
    The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( svcListener- Prof ) cannot be found.
    The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer.
    You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details.
    The following information is part of the event: Exception in Oracle Connection- 12560 EOracleError.Edited by: user574699 on 20-mei-2009 5:53

    Exception in Oracle Connection- 12560 EOracleError.12560, 00000, "TNS:protocol adapter error"
    // *Cause: A generic protocol adapter error occurred.
    // *Action: Check addresses used for proper protocol specification. Before
    // reporting this error, look at the error stack and check for lower level
    // transport errors. For further details, turn on tracing and reexecute the
    // operation. Turn off tracing when the operation is complete.

  • ZLM Event Log and System Event Log

    I just created my base ZLM server using version 7.3 and updated a test SLES 10 server to use the 7.3 agent. The SLES server was running sp1 and running the 64-bit OS. I was able to successfully upgrade the server to sp2 but I noticed I don't get any entries in the event or system event log areas. This is under the Devices > Servers > Server name I could tell if the bundles installed successfully or the device was refreshed. I don't get anything now. Any thoughts or suggestions on how to fix this?

    Oops. Sorry. Here is the output from rug ping
    ZMD 7.3.0, Copyright (C) 2009 Novell, Inc.
    Started at 4/15/2009 2:13:14 PM (uptime: 1 days, 23 hours, 33 minutes)
    RSS size: 141440
    Network Connected: Yes
    Running on Mono 1.2.6
    OS Target: SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10.2 (x86_64)
    Module Name | Description
    -------------------+-------------------------------------------------
    Image Agent Module | Novell ZENWorks Imaging Agent
    Policy Manager | Manages policy enforcement on the device
    Settings | Handles Settings refresh events.
    TessModule | Tess Module
    Inventory | Software and Hardware inventory module for Linux
    NetworkManager | NetworkManager support
    Package Management | Package Management module for Linux
    RMModule | Remote Management module
    ZENworks Server | SOAP methods used by a ZENworks server
    Scheduled Actions | Scheduled Actions module for ZMD
    XML-RPC interface | Export ZMD public interfaces over XML-RPC
    log level is set to info
    log-level | info | Logging level (off, fatal, error, warn, info, debug)

  • Reporting Services not automatically starting. System event log 7009, Application event: 18456

    For the past month (since Oct 11,2012)  reporting services (SSRS 2008R2) is not starting after the server is rebooted. The service is set to automatically start and starts manually without a problem.  The system event log contains the following error:
    Event ID 7009: A timeout was reached (30000 milliseconds) while waiting for the SQL Server Reporting Services (MSSQLSERVER) service to connect.
    SQL logs :
    The SQL logs has many "Event 18456 Login Failed, State 38" errors when the database engine starts. I assume clients conections are failing because the databases  aren't online yet. None of these 18456 errors coorespond to the account reporting services
    runs under.
    The SQL logs indication Event 7009 occures before the "ReportingServer" database is online so im assuming there is a dependancy but I don't know how to avoid this.
    This problem is occuring on a number of our servers running SSRS (if not all)
    Any ideas?
    Paul

    Hi A141695,
    For Event ID 7009, you can try to do the steps below to resolve it.
        1. Click Start, click Run, type regedit, and then click OK.
        2. Locate and then click the following registry subkey:
            HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control
        3. Right-click Control, point to New, and then click DWORD Value.
        4. In the New Value #1 box, type ServicesPipeTimeout, and then press ENTER.
        5. Right-click ServicesPipeTimeout, and then click Modify.
        6. Click Decimal, type the number of milliseconds that you want to wait until the service times out, and then click OK.
    For example, to wait 60 seconds before the service times out, type 60000.
    Quit Registry Editor, and then restart the computer. For more information about it, please see:
    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic850540-1550-1.aspx#bm851211
    http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/08/22/configmgr-2012-sms_srs_reporting_point-component-failure/
    If you have any questions, please feel free to ask.
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
    here.

  • Wireless ThinkPad 11abgn for Windows XP, 2000 ver.7.4.2.105 - new event log entries since update

    On 10/17/08, I updated my wireless ThinkPad 11abgn driver from version 6.0.3.94 to 7.4.2.105.  The update was a nice improvement as I now connect faster than with the older driver.  However, although no impact to my T60 performance, ever since the new driver was installed, the following has occurred:
    1. A new entry in the Event Viewer called ACS
    2. Multiple "ccxroaming" entries are generated every time my laptop comes out of standby (anywhere from 4 to 7 entries each time!)
    3. Since 10/17/08, I have generated 951 ACS events!!
    For example, this morning, after coming out of standby (AC mode), the following entries were generated from oldest to newest:
    The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( ccxroaming ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: <15> Oct 28 8:28:57 (my computer name) Wireless Adapter removed...
    The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( ccxroaming ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: <15> Oct 28 8:28:57 (my computer name) New Wireless Adapter detected..
    The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( ccxroaming ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: <15> Oct 28 8:29:02 (my computer name) System resumed from suspend state..
    The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( ccxroaming ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: <15> Oct 28 8:29:02 (my computer name) New Wireless Adapter detected..
    The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( ccxroaming ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: <15> Oct 28 8:29:03  (my computer name) System resumed from suspend state..
    The description for Event ID ( 1 ) in Source ( ccxroaming ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: <15> Oct 28 8:29:06 (my computer name) Wireless Adapter associated successfully..
    I can understand Lenovo possibly wanting to generate this information when testing a new driver in-house, but does this really need to be passed on the end user?
    T60, 8744-5BU: 2.0 GHz T7200, 4 GB RAM, 15.4" WSXGA+, 1680x1050 ATI Mobility Radeon X1400, Win 7 Ultimate w/SP1 - 64-bit

    I downgraded upower, and it didn't fix the problem, so I re-upgraded it and built/installed xfce4-power-manager-git. It's now reporting the correct battery level but the systray icon is missing (replaced by the 'blank screen' icon).
    EDIT: in fact, no, it's still not reporting correctly.
    Last edited by markhadman (2014-04-19 12:35:08)

  • WMI stops returning event log entries

    A little bit of a strange issues with Server 2008. We've been trying to implement cisco CDA for a customer which uses wmi to read the security log on a DC and then matches the users up with the devices that are connecting to the network. Every week or so
    the CDA would stop receiving mappings from 2 out of 3 domain controllers. Once the wmi service is restarted on the DC the events start going through again.
    I've been able to replicate the behaviour using a script:
    strComputer = "dc-001.domain.local"
    Set objWMIService = GetObject("winmgmts:{(Security)}\\" & _
    strComputer & "\root\cimv2")
    Set colMonitoredEvents = objWMIService.ExecNotificationQuery _    
    ("Select * from __InstanceCreationEvent Where " _
    & "TargetInstance ISA 'Win32_NTLogEvent' " _
    & "and TargetInstance.EventCode=4768")
    Do While True
    Set objLatestEvent = colMonitoredEvents.NextEvent()
    Wscript.Echo objLatestEvent.TargetInstance.User
    Wscript.Echo objLatestEvent.TargetInstance.TimeWritten
    wscript.Echo objLatestEvent.TargetInstance.Message
    Wscript.Echo
    Loop
    This hotfix http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2705357 seems to match what I'm seeing as there
    are no errors ...just no events returned back. Unfortunately installing the hotfix made no difference at all.
    It's also worth noting I can run different wmi queries while the one above isn't working so wmi service is up and running.
    Has anyone else come across this, or have I missed another patch somewhere?

    Hi Kacenka,
    On current situation, please use
    WMI Diagnosis Tool to ascertain the current state of the WMI service. For more details, please refer to the following article.
    WMIDiag 2.1 is here!
    Meanwhile, please post the above script in the
    Official Scripting Guys Forum, then confirm if it can help you to achieve that target correctly.
    If any more detail, please feel free to let me know.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu

  • HH3 event log entries?

    Can anyone tell me what's going on with my hub's firewall as there suddenly seem to be a lot of unusual entries, as well as a large number of blocked outgoing packets. What is "ath3" and "OpenWifi IPsec"?
    16:58:34, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 43 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:33, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [fe80:0000:0000:0000:414c:062b:ddbf:1bee]:56097->[​ff02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001:0003]:5355 on ath3)
    16:58:33, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 21 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:32, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:137->[10.182.64.143]:137 on ath3)
    16:58:32, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 25 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:31, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:137->[10.182.64.143]:137 on ath3)
    16:58:31, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 151 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:30, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:137->[10.182.64.143]:137 on ath3)
    16:58:30, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 39 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:29, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:137->[10.182.64.143]:137 on ath3)
    16:58:29, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 83 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:28, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:138->[10.182.64.143]:138 on ath3)
    16:58:28, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 89 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:27, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:137->[10.182.64.143]:137 on ath3)
    16:58:27, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 55 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:26, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:137->[10.182.64.143]:137 on ath3)
    16:58:26, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 78 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:25, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [fe80:0000:0000:0000:414c:062b:ddbf:1bee]:1900->[f​f02:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:000c]:1900 on ath3)
    16:58:25, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 15 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:25, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:1900->[239.255.255.250]:1900 on ath3)
    16:58:25, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 58 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:24, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: UDP [10.182.64.138]:1900->[239.255.255.250]:1900 on ath3)
    16:58:21, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 52 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:19, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: IGMP 10.182.64.138->224.0.0.22 on ath3)
    16:58:19, 27 Mar.
    BLOCKED 10 more packets (because of Advanced Filter Rule)
    16:58:19, 27 Mar.
    OUT: BLOCK [44] Advanced Filter Rule (fw/policy/0/chain/fw_ath3_out/rule/0: IGMP 192.168.1.86->224.0.0.22 on ath3)
    16:57:58, 27 Mar.
    IN: BLOCK [15] Default policy (TCP [108.61.8.197]:80->[109.154.74.144]:1234 on ppp1)

    Hi benjp88,
    Another forum user has discussed this before and that seems to be just a log of the firewall working as it should.  Check out this forum post for more info.
    Cheers
    Neil
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Windows update KB2964444 broke Event Logging Service and SQL Agent Service on Windows Server 2008 R2

    I got the following problem:
    I discovered that on my Windows Server 2008R2 machine the event logging stopped working on 04/May/2014 at 03:15.
    Also, SQL Agent Service won't run
    The only change that day was security
    update KB2964444 - Security
    Update for Internet Explorer 11 for Windows Server 2008 R2for x64-based Systems, that was installed exactly 04/May/2014 at 03:00. Apparently, that's what broke my machine...
    When I try to start Windows Event Log via net
    start eventlog or via Services
    panel, I get an error:
    C:\Users\Administrator>net start eventlog
    The Windows Event Log service is starting.
    The Windows Event Log service could not be started.
    A system error has occurred.
    System error 2 has occurred.
    The system cannot find the file specified.
    I tried:
    restarted the OS (virtual on the host's VMWare).
    re-checked the settings in services menu -they are like in the link.
    checked the identity in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\eventlog -
    the identity is NT
    AUTHORITY\LocalService
    gave all Authenticated Users full access to C:\Windows\System32\winevt\Logs
    ran fc /scannow - Windows Resource Protection did not find any integrity violations.
    went to the file %windir%\logs\cbs\cbs.log -
    all clean, [SR] Repairing 0 components
    EDIT: Uninstalled the recent system updates and rebooted - didn't help
    EDIT: Sysinternals Process Monitor results when running start service from services panel (procmon in elevated mode):
    filters:
    process name is svchost.exe : include
    operation contains TCP : exclude
    the events captured are:
    21:50:33.8105780 svchost.exe 772 Thread Create SUCCESS Thread ID: 6088
    21:50:33.8108848 svchost.exe 772 RegOpenKey HKLM SUCCESS Desired Access: Maximum Allowed, Granted Access: Read
    21:50:33.8109134 svchost.exe 772 RegQueryKey HKLM SUCCESS Query: HandleTags, HandleTags: 0x0
    21:50:33.8109302 svchost.exe 772 RegOpenKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services REPARSE Desired Access: Read
    21:50:33.8109497 svchost.exe 772 RegOpenKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services SUCCESS Desired Access: Read
    21:50:33.8110051 svchost.exe 772 RegCloseKey HKLM SUCCESS
    21:50:33.8110423 svchost.exe 772 RegQueryKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services SUCCESS Query: HandleTags, HandleTags: 0x0
    21:50:33.8110705 svchost.exe 772 RegOpenKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog SUCCESS Desired Access: Read
    21:50:33.8110923 svchost.exe 772 RegQueryKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog SUCCESS Query: HandleTags, HandleTags: 0x0
    21:50:33.8111257 svchost.exe 772 RegOpenKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Parameters SUCCESS Desired Access: Read
    21:50:33.8111547 svchost.exe 772 RegCloseKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services SUCCESS
    21:50:33.8111752 svchost.exe 772 RegCloseKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog SUCCESS
    21:50:33.8111901 svchost.exe 772 RegQueryValue HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Parameters\ServiceDll SUCCESS Type: REG_SZ, Length: 68, Data: %SystemRoot%\System32\wevtsvc.dll
    21:50:33.8112148 svchost.exe 772 RegCloseKey HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Parameters SUCCESS
    21:50:33.8116552 svchost.exe 772 Thread Exit SUCCESS Thread ID: 6088, User Time: 0.0000000, Kernel Time: 0.0000000
    NOTE: previoulsy, for
    21:46:31.6130476 svchost.exe 772 RegQueryValue HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Parameters\ServiceDll SUCCESS Type: REG_SZ, Length: 68, Data: %SystemRoot%\System32\wevtsvc.dll
    I also got NAME
    NOT FOUND error ,so I created the new string value for the Parameters with
    the name ServiceDll and
    data %SystemRoot%\System32\wevtsvc.dll (copied
    from the upper HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog key)
    and this event now is
    21:46:31.6130476 svchost.exe 772 RegQueryValue HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\eventlog\Parameters\ServiceDll SUCCESS Type: REG_SZ, Length: 68, Data: %SystemRoot%\System32\wevtsvc.dll
    I also checked for the presence of wevtsvc.dll in
    the place and it's there.
    Also, I tried to capture all events with path containing 'event' and
    got following events firing every several seconds:
    21:38:38.9185226 services.exe 492 RegQueryValue HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\EventSystem\Tag NAME NOT FOUND Length: 16
    21:38:38.9185513 services.exe 492 RegQueryValue HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\EventSystem\DependOnGroup NAME NOT FOUND Length: 268
    21:38:38.9185938 services.exe 492 RegQueryValue HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\services\EventSystem\Group NAME NOT FOUND Length: 268
    Also, I tried to capture all the events containing 'file',
    excluding w3wp.exe,
    chrome.exe, wmiprvse.exe, wmtoolsd.exe, System and it shows NO attempts to access any file ih the time I try to start
    the event logger (if run from cmd - there are several hits by net executable,
    not present if run from the panel).
    What can be done?

    Hi,
    I don’t found the similar issue, if you have the IE 11 please try to update system automatic or install the MS14-029 update.
    The related KB:
    MS14-029: Security update for Internet Explorer 11 for systems that do not have update 2919355 (for Windows 8.1 or Windows Server 2012 R2) or update 2929437 (for Windows 7
    SP1 or Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1) installed: May 13, 2014
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2961851/en-us
    Hope this helps.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Event logging in Parent-Child packages

    Hello,
    I have a set of Parent-Child SSIS packages. A Parent package invokes a bunch of child packages via "Execute Package Tasks".
    I have set up custom event logging (to a SQL table) inside both Parent and Child Packages' Event Handlers (OnPreExecute, OnPostExecute, OnError).
    I noticed that when a Child Package raises an event, both the Child Package's event handler and the Parent Package's event handler get fired, thereby creating duplicate event logging entries.
    So, as a quick work around, I disabled event handlers in Child packages hoping that the Parent Package's event handlers will catch and log all events nicely. However, when the Parent Package's event handler writes event details to the table, it uses the
    Parent Package's System::PackageId, System::PackageGUID and System::PackageName rather than that of the Child Package that originally raised the event!. So, my event log table records all events as if they were raised by the Parent Package!
    Is it possible to disbale event bubbling up from Child Packages to the Parent package?
    What options do I have to fix this problem?
    Thanks

    I came across this same issue and found a pretty nice workaround.
    In brief, I used a Stored Procedure to write the OnError to a Logging table. So when this stored procedure was called I checked if the error was already in the logging table, and if it was then no record would be inserted.
    I was already using the logging method 2 detailed here with a few changes.
    To the PackageLog table I added a ParemtExecutionID value, which was passed into the child package through a Parent Variable Configuration. So for the OnPreExecute handler, the Parent Package passed NULL for the ParemtExecutionID, but the Child Package passed
    in the Variable.
    In the ErrorLog table I added a SourceID column, which is the GUID of the task that generated the error. In the Parent/Child Package configuration, the SourceID is the same in both OnError handlers.
    So then when the Parent OnError handler calls the stored procedure, it checks if an ErrorLog record exists for the ParentExecutionID and SourceID combination.
    Below is the OnError Stored Procedure I used. (Note: In my example only the Child Package has a Queue ID value.)
    Create Procedure [dbo].[usp_Integration_Log_Error] (
    @Execution_Id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER,
    @Queue_Id INTEGER = NULL,
    @Source_Name VARCHAR(255),
    @Source_Id UNIQUEIDENTIFIER,
    @Err_Code INTEGER,
    @Err_Message NVARCHAR(MAX)
    AS
    BEGIN
    DECLARE @ErrorCount INTEGER
    IF @Queue_Id IS NULL
    SELECT
    @ErrorCount = Count(*)
    FROM
    INTEGRATION_ERROR IE
    INNER JOIN
    INTEGRATION_LOG IL ON IE.EXECUTION_ID = IL.EXECUTION_ID
    WHERE
    IL.PARENT_EXECUTION_ID = @Execution_Id AND
    IE.SOURCE_ID = @Source_Id
    IF ISNULL(@ErrorCount,0) = 0
    INSERT INTO
    INTEGRATION_ERROR (
    EXECUTION_ID,
    QUEUE_ID,
    SOURCE_NAME,
    SOURCE_ID,
    ERR_CODE,
    ERR_MESSAGE
    VALUES (
    @Execution_Id,
    @Queue_Id,
    @Source_Name,
    @Source_Id,
    @Err_Code,
    @Err_Message
    END

  • Thinking about using the Windows Event Logs as my main log store - looking for pros and cons

    I have been writing some larger scripts that write to physical log files.  Until today I have avoided trying to use the Windows Event logs, but, am beginning to rethink this and wondered if anyone has done this, and, what the strengths and weaknesses
    of this logging approach has been.  If I do it, I will probably write a function that accepts pipelined input and simply pass output to the log.  I wanted to get a feel for what I would be getting into before I started writing things up since this
    will probably take a little bit of work to get set up to run properly.

    At my company we use the Windows event log for many of our batch process logging for several reasons:
    Unlike logging to a central database, the Windows event log is always available. I've seen poorly thought out logging solution which log to a database and if the database happens to be unavailable the batch process would fail.
    Monitoring tool such as SCOM already have Windows event log watchers so adding alerts to take action based on message written to the Windows event log is easy
    Built-in support for writing Windows event log entries in the Powershell V2 write-eventlog cmdlet, a simple CLR can created in SQL Server or even command-line eventcreate.exe
    Easy to create a custom event log so you don't have to use the default application log in Windows 2008 and higher.
    Most shrink-wrap S/W already use the event log
    Issues I've seen:
    Windows 2008 with UAC on requires "registering" i.e. creating a new event log source with UAC. This can be done one time manually. Unfortunately there isn't a way to automate UAC--pure GUI. The Powershell command would be "New-EventLog -LogName Application
    -Source  mysource" if you're using the Application log and must be run as  administrator.
    Errant process writes many entries to the event log. Depending on the volume like for example writing stack dumps this can performance problems. I  think I recall an issue an Windows 2003 or Windows 2008 with UAC off  if you're creating a new
    event log source each time (which you shouldn't) then these results in many registry entries which can cause problems.
    I don't think the issues outweigh the benefits--just something to be aware of.

  • Event Log / ServiceNow

    Greetings,
    Recently the company started using the ServiceNow application for tracking IT incidents and request.  A new process in xMII BLS 14 is being requested that should create incidents in ServiceNow as they occur.
    The current process to make this happen is for the application to put an entry into the event log and then have  MS System Center Operation Manager populate the ServiceNow Incident.  I know this sounds round about but it is what it is...
    Can xMII BLS 14 create event log entries and if so, HOW?
    Thank you,
    Dennis W

    If your talking about service.now It looks like they do have some web services available for integration.
    SOAP Web Service - ServiceNow Wiki
    Regards,
    Christian

Maybe you are looking for

  • My printer is saying that it is out of paper when I try to print on 4x6 or 5x7 paper.

    When I try to print on 4x6 or 5x7 paper the printer is saying that it is out of paper. It will print on 81/2 x 11. not sure what is going on.

  • Resolving contflicts between 32-bit and 64-bit rpm packages

    This "glibc-devel-2.12-1.7-i686.rpm" is required which for 32-bit to install Enterprise Manager in 64-bit machine. But while installing it using yum, getting following exceptions in the logs. Please help. ** Found 10 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'y

  • PC Suite - connect only ONE phone via Bluetooth?

    Every time I launch the PC Suite to connect MY phone via Bluetooth, every Nokia phone in the house -which was once connected to the PC Suite- gets asked to connect, many times. This is very annoying for other people who obviously have no intention of

  • Install failed on solaris

    I am getting the following error when installing wls6.0 on a solaris 5.7 system. Does anyone know what is missing? Thanks. $ sh weblogic600sp1_sol.bin Preparing to install... Invocation of this Java Application has caused an InvocationTargetException

  • Help with the new condition

    Hi all I have the following sequel: SELECT 'Negotiation' calc_type, SUM(CASE WHEN days < 30 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) days , SUM(CASE WHEN days >= 31 AND days < 60 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) days2 , SUM(CASE WHEN days >=61 AND days < 90 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) days3 , S