Create two or more GL account in same material grp

Is it possible to create a two or more GL account for material group based on plant level.
Thanks

Hi Elaine,
I am not quite sure what are you trying to do. Do you mean material type? Either or the assignments of GL accounts to materials mainly depend on the valuation class. So under the same material type you could have different materials going to different accounts or valuation class. Typically each Material Type is defaulted to one valuation class, but that doesn't necessary mean that individual materials master records can be changed to another one, which may be pointing to another GL account.
Hope this helps.
GG

Similar Messages

Have two i phones owned by one person. Gave older I phone 4 to spouse. All synced items going to both phones. Created two different Apple ID Accounts but still having problems. Bought more icloud for one device but it went to the other one didnt need

How can i seperate to i phones that have been synced together. I created two different Apple Id accounts but for instance my icloud purchase didnt go to the phone i needed it to go to

If you look at Settings > iCloud on each phone, is the Account different? The Apple ID listed there should control iCloud storage allocation. [I assume your "icloud purchase" was more storage capacity.]
The Apple ID is separately specified to control iMessage, iTunes and App Store purchases, etc.

Is there a way to work with two or more app at the same time on iPhone or iPad

Is there a way to work with two or more app at the same time on iPhone or iPad?

What i am attempting to achieve is to work with at least two app at the same time. For example: select any picture from my albums to attach them in an email. Another example is get data from an app to use it with the calc app. And there are more exaples for it. And for sure I need support for an iPad air. I mencioned the other tablet just to try to be a bit clearer.

How to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution. So far I didn't find a standard option in Business One neither a solution in this forum.
Best regards,
Tim

Tim,
There is nothing in the application settings in Business One that could be used to prevent this. You may post this to the SDK forum as well and perhaps there is a way to achieve this through SDK.

How to avoid that two or more people alter the same Sales Order same time

I'm looking for a way to avoid that two or more people altering the same Sales Order at the same time.
If someone has entered a Sales Order in the system and something needs to be adjust it can be done by two or more people at the same time. The problem is that when someone is saving these changes, the changes of another person, who is still working on the same order, get lost.
So what we need is an alert that someone is already using this order and that no other person can make any changes at that time. So the order needs to be blocked for altering for any other person at that time.
To avoid this I think you have to do something with the Stored Procedure. Or has someone a more simple and better solution.
I've already put this thread in the Business One forum and someone suggested to put it in the Business One SDK forum, as there isn't a solution in Business One itself.
So if someone can give me a direction for a solution I would be very pleased.
Best regards,
Tim

Hi Tim,
The only thing that comes close to what you want in standard SBO is Data Ownership. However, this can't stop someone editing a document that is already being edited.
You can't use stored procedures to track which document is open because the SBO_SP_TransactionNotification proc (which is the only one that you are able to customise) is triggered when a document is updated or added (or cancelled or closed) and not when the document is actually being edited in the user-interface.
You could do this by writing an addon that uses the UI API to trap events in the sales order form. In theory, a sales order is being edited if the sales order form is in Update mode (ie in order for the form to be in Update mode, the user must have selected an existing document and changed the value of at least one field). You can trap the event of the user changing a value and then log the user and document in a table. When other users try to edit the same document, you could check the table and then prevent them changing values. When the first user clicks on the update button (or cancels the update or closes the form etc etc) you can remove the lock on the document. However, I have doubts as to how robust it would be. The problem with this kind of locking solution is that you sometimes get 'stranded' locks (eg user was editing a document when their workstation crashed) and the solution can end up being more troublesome than it is worth.
Kind Regards,
Owen

ERROR: MyService.jws:715:There are two or more operations with the same schema-element 'ns0:MyNameSpace' on the input message in a web service file or callback interface.

I have two web service operations that have the same complex type as their input
parameter. I want to map this type to an existing schema. I can successfully
do this with the first operation using XQuery but when I attempt to do this with
the second operation I get the following error:
ERROR: MyService.jws:715:There are two or more operations with the same schema-element
'ns0:MyNamespace' on the input message in a web service file or callback interface.
ERROR: SUGGESTION: Use different schema-element values for each of those operations.
How can I use different schema-element values? The input parameters are to be
mapped to the same schema and same element since they are the same for both operations....

I am having the same problem. How did you resolve this..?? could you please tell me the solution??
Thanks
Shari

Pick activity is not working properly while creating two or more file adapt

Hi,
pick activity is not working properly while creating two or more file adapter for bpel process.
bpel process compiled and deployed succesfully but while observing the wsdl file of deployed process you can find only one file adapter. so it polls only from that location.
can anybody help on over this? or it's limitation of jdev to use only one file adapter at time while using Pick.
Thanks
sagar

Does anybody tried this?
Thanks
sagar

Two or more users editing the same script file in cq5, is it possible?

In cq5 is possible two or more users editing the same jsp file? There is a lock system preventing simultaneous editing of the same file?
Thanks,
Gabriel

you really should use eclipse and maven to work with multiple developers. something like [1] will be helpful
[1] http://www.cqblueprints.com/xwiki/bin/view/Blue+Prints/The+CQ+Project+Maven+Archetype

Mac App Store Gift Cards is possible use two or more cards for buying same stuff?

Mac App Store Gift Cards is possible use two or more cards for buying same stuff? i form finland if changes things. and i ask becouse i cannot get credit card.
But i foudn shop which sells at least these gift cards.

Two or more cards for the same purchase, I'm not certain. Buy a another gift card, redeem that to add to your balance then make a purchase.

Automatic batch determination when more items have the same material

Hi guys,
I have a problem with automatic batch determination in the delivery note where more items has the same material number.
For example:
Sales order items
Item   Material   Q
1        130         5 kg
2        130         4 kg
Stock for this storage location is:
material    batch    Q
130           1000     3kg
130           1001     7kg
When I create delivery note I get this:
Item   Material   Q   Batch
1       130
90001 130       3     1000
90002 130       2     1001
2       130
90003 130       3     1000
30004 130       1     1001
As you can see, both items has the same batches. This is not good, when post goods issue. Normally there is no stock availaible for both items.
Is there any customizing to do this correctlly?
Thanks for an ansver.
BR, Matic

What is the purpose of giving the same material as second line item.
specify in the first line item itself.
or els the condition record which you have specified that for 100 material of A gives 10 material of B modify it to 10 of A should give 1 material of B
The first you will be useful for you.

Sales Deal with two different validation dates for the same material

Hi SAPers,
I am trying to create a u201CSales Dealu201D VB31, for the same material/condition, but with two different validation dates. After the creation of the first record, I select u201CNew conditionu201D button, but the system give me the message VK104, u201Cthe condition is being processed in the current session.u201D.
How can I solve this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Pedro

We can't have multiple records for the same condition and key values valid on the same date. The condition end date is part of the primary key in the database table. The date ranges between the records cannot overlap. When you create a new record, usually the end date is set to 12/31/9999 by default. If you need to have this deal to end on a different date and a new deal to start afterwards, then first you need to change 12/31/9999 to a different date.
Also usually I try to exit the screen between the transactions.

FEBA - How to post two or more transactions at the same time?

Hi,
    one of our banks sends the statemets with many lines that belongs to the same transaction. We have to post partially one line, and afterwards the other line. Any of you know how to post two lines at the same time from the bank statement?
Thank you in advance,
Miguel

Hi,
I'm sorry for replying so late.
The solution I reached was to change the a few things in the standard.
Now I have a new "context menu item". I select two or more transactions and I right-click the mouse. I select that "context menu item" and the next part of the code adds the total amount of the transactions to look for the correct post for the first transaction. Once posted automatically, the next transaction is posted automatically by the system.
I hope you understand my English. I've problem with technical FI terms.
Here you are the code:
First I added a new contextual menu item:
CL_FEBAN_ALV_GRID=============CCIMP
call method e_object->add_function
    EXPORTING
        fcode = 'BS_POST_ITEMS'
        text = text-002.
*{ INSERT DHTK904078 1
*--> Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
* RIPI 24/04/2008 - Conciliaciones
* Permitir conciliar mu00E1s de un apunte a la vez
    call method e_object->add_function
        EXPORTING
            fcode = 'ZBS_POST_ITEMS'
            text = text-Z02.
*<-- Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
*} INSERT
    call method e_object->add_function
        EXPORTING
            fcode = 'BS_KILL_ADVICE'
            text = text-004.
CL_FEBAN_ALV_GRID=============CCIMP
when 'BS_POST_ITEMS'.
    call method cl_feban_propagator=>raise_event
        EXPORTING
            i_event = 'POST_ITEMS'
            i_ref_to_item = l_ref_to_item.
*{ INSERT DHTK904078 2
*--> Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
* RIPI 24/04/2008 - Conciliaciones
* Permitir conciliar mu00E1s de un apunte a la vez
    when 'ZBS_POST_ITEMS'.
        call method cl_feban_propagator=>raise_event
            EXPORTING
                i_event = 'ZPOST_ITEMS'
                i_ref_to_item = l_ref_to_item.
*<-- Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
*} INSERT
    when 'BS_LOCK_ITEMS'.
        call method cl_feban_propagator=>raise_event
            EXPORTING
                i_event = 'LOCK_ITEMS'
                i_ref_to_item = l_ref_to_item.
CL_FEBAN_PROPAGATOR===========CM001
    when 'POST_ITEMS'.
        raise event post_items
            exporting i_ref_to_item = i_ref_to_item.
*{ INSERT DHTK904078 1
*--> Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
* RIPI 24/04/2008 - Conciliaciones
* Permitir conciliar mu00E1s de un apunte a la vez
    when 'ZPOST_ITEMS'.
        data: zvalor(1) value '' .
            export zvalor from 'X' to memory ID 'ZFEBA01'.
            raise event post_items
                exporting i_ref_to_item = i_ref_to_item.
*<-- Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
*} INSERT
    when 'LOCK_ITEMS'.
        raise event lock_items
            exporting i_ref_to_item = i_ref_to_item.
Now, I proceed to calculate the total amount of the selected transactions to look for the correct one to post.
LNEW_FEBAF01
*     user parameter
        l_feban_position type c.
        field-symbols: <items> type item_tab_type.
*{ INSERT DHTK904077 1
*--> Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
* RIPI 24/04/2008 - Conciliaciones
* Permitir conciliar mu00E1s de un apunte a la vez
    data: zvalor(1) value '',
        zkwbtr type kwbtr,
        kwb type kwbtr.
    import zvalor to zvalor from memory ID 'ZFEBA01'.
    if ( zvalor is not initial ).
        if not i_ref_to_item is initial.
            assign i_ref_to_item->* to <items>.
            loop at <items> into h_item.
                select single kwbtr
                    into kwb
                    from febep
                    where kukey = h_item-kukey and
                        esnum = h_item-esnum.
                        zkwbtr = zkwbtr + kwb.
            endloop.
        endif.
        export zkwbtr from zkwbtr to memory ID 'ZKWBTR'.
    endif.
*<-- Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
*} INSERT
    refresh g_picked_items.
    if not i_ref_to_item is initial.
        assign i_ref_to_item->* to <items>.
        loop at <items> into h_item.
            move-corresponding h_item to h_picked_items.
            append h_picked_items to g_picked_items.
        endloop.
    endif.
    submit rfebbu00 and return
        user sy-uname
        with anwnd = r_doc->*-anwnd
        with s_kukey in s_kukey
        with s_esnum in s_esnum
        with buber = g_posting_area
        with mregel = '1'
        with function = 'C'
        with mode = g_mode
        with p_bupro = g_bupro.
*{ INSERT DHTK904077 2
*--> Miguel Estu00E9vez - 17/06/2008
* RIPI 24/04/2008 - Conciliaciones
* Permitir conciliar mu00E1s de un apunte a la vez
    if ( zkwbtr is not initial ).
        select single kwbtr
            into kwb
            from febep
            where kukey = h_kukey-low and
                esnum = h_esnum-low.
                zkwbtr = zkwbtr - kwb.
        export zkwbtr from zkwbtr to memory ID 'ZKWBTR'.
    endif.
*<-- Miguel Estu00E9vez - 17/06/2008
*} INSERT
    refresh s_kukey.
    refresh s_esnum.
    clear h_kukey.
    clear h_esnum.
endloop. "loop over all picked items
call function 'CUSTOMIZED_MESSAGE'
    EXPORTING
        i_arbgb = 'NEW_FEBA'
        i_dtype = '-'
        i_msgnr = '110'.
RFEBBU00
* original transaction currency provided and posting area = 2.
        ftclear-selvon = febep-fwbtr. "INSERT - mpEURO
    ENDIF. "INSERT - mpEURO
    CONDENSE ftclear-selvon NO-GAPS.
*{ INSERT DHTK903977 1
*--> Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
* RIPI 24/04/2008 - Conciliaciones
* Permitir conciliar mu00E1s de un apunte a la vez
    data: zkwbtr type kwbtr.
    import zkwbtr to zkwbtr from memory ID 'ZKWBTR'.
    if ( zkwbtr is not initial ).
        ftclear-selvon = zkwbtr.
        clear zkwbtr.
    endif.
*<-- Miguel Estu00E9vez - 16/06/2008
*} INSERT
APPEND ftclear.
** Begin of comment C5053248
* perform druck_buzei_ftclear using ftclear-agkon.

Hi, iTunes 11.1 don't tell me the duration of two or more tracks from the same album, which iTunes 10. did. How come? It is possible that the new version lacks such a possibility? Thanks

Hi, thanks to whoever will be able to respond - which the Apple assistance on line in Italy could not do, after minutes of conversation!
The point is that I cannot see anymore the total duration of two or more audio tracks selected from the same CD, but only the duration of the whole CD.
With the previous version of iTunes this was very easy, as I simply clicked on the tracks the interested me and I suddenly had the total time.
It makes no sense that Apple provides a new version which lacks one of the endless options of the program, therefore I hope it's only my faul in not being able to understand what to do. Otherwise, please tell me how can I downgrade and go back to iTunes 10....
Paul Meadow

Press CTRL+/
tt2

How to create two or more JVM in one machine ?

Hi to some background ,I want to invoke RMI call to a server ,and I have written the following client code ,that access a getCounter()to show the incremented static variables value ,each time calling the getCounter() will increment the static variable by 1.That code is deployed in the server.
PDOS_Remote_Interface service1 =(PDOS_Remote_Interface)Naming.lookup("rmi://x.xxx.xxx.xxx/REMOTE_SERVICE");
String s1= service1.sayHello();
int cont1 = service1.getCounter();
System.out.println(">>>>>> "+s1);
System.out.println(">>>>>> cont1 "+cont1);
PDOS_Remote_Interface service2 =(PDOS_Remote_Interface)Naming.lookup("rmi://y.yyy.yyy.yyy/REMOTE_SERVICE");
String s2= service2.sayHello();
int cont2 = service2.getCounter();
System.out.println(">>>>>> "+s2);
System.out.println(">>>>>> cont2 "+cont2);
This is working fine with even two different server (I mean in two physically different machine(x ip and y ip) ,there ip are different )
with following output :
Server Says Hai!
cont1 0
Server Says Hai!
cont2 0that is static variable is not shareing as they are in two different server
Now My problem:
I want to hit the one and only server ,In this case Service1 and Service2 are getting the remote instance from only one machine .And when I am doing that I am getting the static variable incremented ,That is following output
Server Says Hai!
cont1 0
Server Says Hai!
cont2 1Is this possible to create two JVM instance in a particular machine ..??
I mean I want the first output (both static variable shows 0)in second implementetion (using only one machine )???

Yes, but the naming service is only going to accept one registration for a given name.

How to create Inpection Lot Z01 & 04 Type for same Material different Plans

I am trying to create an Inspectoin Lot for two different Inspection Types. One for (Z01) Incoming Inspection via MIGO and the other for (04) GR Inspection for Production via MFBF. The problem is I have the same Material for two different Inspection Plans. The Z01 Inspection Type was copies from the 01 Inspection Type only difference is I activated the Multiple Specs feature for Z01.
1st Plan = Materia Group....BM206014, Group Counter....1 (GR Incoming Inspectoin Z01 type)
2nd Plan = Material Group....BM206014, Group Counter....2 (GR Inspection for Production 04 type)
A) When I do the (Material Backflush) MFBF for the 04 type, the Inspection Lot gets created OK. I then can go into QA32 and assign the correct Inspection Plat by clicking the Inspection Lot button.
B) When I do the MIGO via the Purchase Order (type Z01), it will not create the Lot if I have the Multiple Specs selected in the QM Material Master MM02. If, I turn off the Multiple Specs in the QM Material Master and create a new PO and MIGO, it will create the Lot, however, it automatically assigns the lot to the wrong Inspection Plan (2nd Plan see above) I need to be able to select the plan like I can with the 04 type.
Is their some setting that can be changed in Config or somewhere that acts the same way as example A above?

>
dhayes12 wrote:
> A) When I do the (Material Backflush) MFBF for the 04 type, the Inspection Lot gets created OK. I then can go into QA32 and assign the correct Inspection Plat by clicking the Inspection Lot button.
>
> B) When I do the MIGO via the Purchase Order (type Z01), it will not create the Lot if I have the Multiple Specs selected in the QM Material Master MM02. If, I turn off the Multiple Specs in the QM Material Master and create a new PO and MIGO, it will create the Lot, however, it automatically assigns the lot to the wrong Inspection Plan (2nd Plan see above) I need to be able to select the plan like I can with the 04 type.
>
> Is their some setting that can be changed in Config or somewhere that acts the same way as example A above?
For case A, create insp plan with usage "1- production" If you have one IP with this usage for given material then system will assign Plan to lot automatically. In your case for second plan update usage as 1.
For case B, system should assign 1st plan make sure for both plan udage is correct. for 1st plan usage should be 5 while 2nd plan usage should be 1. Now if your 1st have status 4 and key date before lot date then system will assign plan auto.
Thanks!!!

Create two or more GL account in same material grp

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for