Creating a Rebate agreement doc for multiple co codes

Hi,
To enable settling one rebate agreement across multiple company codes.
We have a scenario, to accomodate on Rebage agreement type for multiple company codes,
and to do the settlement for the billing documents created in these multiple company codes.
I think it is a standard processes, but how to execute this to get the results,pls suggest.
Regards
AK

Hi Franck,
Thanks for your prompt feedback,
Further to the issue I would like to clarify couple of other issues related to
the processing of one Rebate agreement for multiple company codes.
1. This is a client requirement, which need to be addressed through
enhancements since standard possibility is ruled out, we have tried with this scenario but sales area is a mandatory entry while creating the agreement type (Tcode-VBO1).
2. If it is feasible could you please provide the configuration steps for the scenario or any enhancements related to this scenario for implementing.
Kindly explain what do you mean by IMHO?
Regards
AK

Similar Messages

One Rebate Agrement linked to multiple company codes

Hi ,
I have a question.Can you let me know on the rebate enhancements if any .I have a scenario where in have to create one Agreement type it can be any rebate agreement ...Customer Rebate ,material Rebate , Heirarchy rebate ..... which can be linked to multiple compnay codes.As per my understanding at the time of creating Rebate agreement it requires sales area data .If we supress that we can make a common Rebate agreement type. Can any one explain on this scenario...How can we go ahead
Kindly let me know if more information is required
Regards
AK

I think that in fact you could create one rebate agreement across payers and company codes (different company codes = different sales organizations), but probably this would only make sense if you you used Extended Rebate Processing.
After activating Extended Rebate you customize the VAKEY construction for S469 structure update so that the system knows, what are the actual values to settle. If you make sure that the rebate conditions in your agreement do not have the sales organization in the access sequence, then there should be no problem to determine those conditions in invoices across company codes. In fact what is important for rebate settlement is that the rebate condition assigned to the agreement is determined in the invoice, not that the sales organization or payer are the same.
Once the rebate conditions are determined in invoices, you must somehow settle the agreement. If you settle in one company code and to one payer only, then this is all you have to do - once the invoices have the conditions determined, settlement will see the values.
If you have to settle across company codes, you will have to introduce the sales organization in the variable key and assign it to sales organization field in the header of the credit memo (VBAK-VKORG). This should work.
I have never tested this particular scenarion, but I have done so many really strange things with extended rebate that I really think it should work. Just remember - the key is that your rebate conditions are determined in the relevant invoices (easiest to achieve by eliminating sales organization from access sequence). If the value is there, you should always find a way to settle (if standard customizing of extended rebates cannot do it, you always have the last option - RBT_ENH_BADI_SETTLE).
If you are successful, let me know - I would really like to know if this scenario is possible as well.
regards
Krzysztof

IDOC or BAPI to create Purchasing Rebate Agreements (Transaction MEB1)

Hi everybody,
Iu2019m using SAP Retail ECC 6.0 and I need to create Purchasing Rebate Agreements (migration and also in a Z program). When we do it manually these agreements are created in Transaction MEB1. Does any one know if there is an IDOC or a BAPI to do this and which one it is?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,

Hi,
I too need to find IDOC for MEBI transaction.
Didi you find any IDOC for it?
Smriti

Rebate agreement setting for new customer

I have a scenario, where business has a customer who had some sales and now that the cusotmer has changed his name and new customer is created for that. old customer has been set for deletion. now business wants to transfer the old customer sales data to new customer inorder to create the rebate agreements. as i understand rebate agrements are created based on customer and cannot be created for old customer and accru another customers sales. did any one came across such scenario, please give your suggestion.

Hi
No it is not, it is accrued into the accruals account based on the accruals value you have defined in the condition record of the agreement.
Example scale :
scale value            Amount             Accruals
       0,00 EUR         5,000- %          7,000-
100,00                   8,000-
1.000,00                12,000-
If you create a real invoice for less than 100 Euro according to your current understanding the 5% rate would apply and if the invoice value was over 100 Euro the 8% rate would apply. In both cases the 7% accrual rate would apply with no consideration of the scale.
When you create rebate condition with scales, for the individual customer billing document,the system will take the first scale level / the accruals amount. Only during the final settlement, will the detailed scales condition be taken into consideration for the real customer payment.
Check this note: 392711 - Rebate conditions with scales
Most customer's would maintain their accruals amount as an average based on the business reality when using rebate scales.
Hope it helps
Kind regards
Brian

SEPA file – how to create one file for multiple company codes

Dear experts,
My company has multiple company codes and they process automatic payments (F110) for multiple company codes in the same run.
The company wants to generate one SEPA file for all company codes.
In OBPM1 for SEPA format in the section ``Payment medium output devided by level of detail`` I unchecked everything (attached).
OBPM4 for SEPA format is showing `` No separation of payment medium output``.
Unfortunately, when I run automatic payments (F110) for multiple codes, multiple files for each company code are created.
Can anyone let me know how it is possible to create one SEPA file that will contain payments for multiple company codes?
Thank you

Hi Zara,
Please check in transaction DMEE your format tree (eg. SEPA_CT), 'DMEE tree: properties' - tab 'Sort/key field'. Is the Sort/key field 'ZBUKR' defined there with Level 1?
Please follow the recommendation of note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1742584
Regards,
Emöke

BAPI or Function Module to create the Rebate Agreement

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I get the flat file which consists of the header and item level data. Using that I have to create the REBATE AGREEMENT. The transaction code to create the Rebate Agreement is VBO1 (Create Rebate Agreement).
Is there any BAPI or FUNCTION MODULE available in SAP to create the Rebate Agreement. Please tell me if you know any suitable BAPI or FM.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Paddu.

Hi Paddu
Were you able to find a BAPI or Function Module to create Rebate Agreement. We have a similar requirement where we have to create Rebate Agreements with Conditions.
If you have found a solution do share it with us.
Regards
Salil

Entry Channel setup for multiple company codes

Hello,
I have a question regarding the entry channel setup (for external requirements in the Plan-Driven Procurement scenario)
In previous implementations, I 've created an entry channel below each company code (as the documentation says it should be). Now, for each entry channel, there was a EBP user assigned, which corresponded to an RFC entry in the backend system (I was connecting EBP to multiple backend systems)
Now, what should I do in the following scenario?:
1. SRM is only connected to one backend system
2. There are 50 company codes
Does that mean I have to create 50 users (for each channel) plus 50 RFC connections in the R/3 system (each with a different user in the backend system), pointing to the same SRM system?
I was thinking of creating an Org iD in the SRM structure at the top (which would be the entry channel), assign only ONE user to it and then fill attribute BUK with all the company codes. However, I don't know if this will work, because the external requirement process might need the company code defined in the "Function" tab... =/
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Gilberto.

Hi Proyecto Genesis,
I am also configuring the Entry channel (org unit) for multiple company codes.
I tried your logic of defining the entry channel outside company code level. Assigned the BUK attribute and extended attribute for plants and storage locations.
Also in my case the local Pur org and Pur group is defined outside the company code. Is it correct?
However the system fails to transfer the external requisition to SRM.
SLG1 displays following error message.
"No address found for partner function type Ship-To Address"
So if I move the Entry channel (org unit) under any one company code level then the external requisitions are transferred correctly to SRM.
But then the issue is the requirements are not transferred with the backend Pur Org and Pur grp. Instead they are transferred to the Pur Org and Pur grp of the company code under which the entry channel is defined.
Can you please share how do we need to define the entry channel, local pur org and pur grp for multiple company codes scenario, so that the ECC requisitions are transferred with the correct company code, pur org and pur grp to SRM?
Or do we need to define Entry channel for each company code and RFC user actually mapping the same backend system?
Please guide.
Regards,
Sandeep

Contract for multiple company codes

Hi,
The requirement is to process the Sales Contract for multiple company codes, the concern is
while creating the Contract document in VA41 we get the Sales area as mandatory.
How to achieve this? if we suppress or make it as optional with some kind of ABAP customisation (what it should it be? usereixt/VOFM routines or what?) would it solve the problem ? if yes ,what would be the impacts on the other transactions.
Kindly suggest.
Regards
SR

Hi
If it is a customer contract (SD contracts) then it is not possible to create the document without specifying the sales area. In the overview screen, even if the sales area is not specified, it takes the value from the 'Sold To' customer master record. If the SP exists in multiple sales areas, then the system displays the different sales areas in a popup and we have to select the appropriate one. To my knowledge, even if you manage to create the contract without those details, you cannot refer them for creating the release orders.
Thanks,
Ravi

Single depreciation run for multiple company codes

Hi experts,
How can I carry out a depreciation run for multiple company codes in one transaction? I thought about creating a variant and running a batch job but you can only select the run for one company code at a time. Am I missing something here. Kindly provide explanation of how this can be done.
Thanks.
Ben

Use the program RAPOST2010. There is no transaction for this program, but you can create your own if necessary, for example ZAFAB.
Please not that there is a separate forum for asset accounting.

One lockbox for multiple company codes

Is it possible to have one lockbox for multiple company codes?

No, I don't think so. Lockbox is 1:1 for a Company Code.
You configure Lockbox for a Company Code.
You can use one of the 2 available Lockbox user exits (not sure which) to write a piece of code that searches invoices against the customer posted to different company codes. You will have to have the intercompany setups.
You may find an OSS notes for intercompany clearing.
Hope this helps!

F.01 - Trial balance for multiple company codes

Hello SAP gurus,
I am trying to use transaction F.01 to generate trial balance for multiple company codes. My ideal output is as follow:
Company Code     GL account     Amount
AAAA                  10000             200,000
AAAA                  10001             100,000
BBBB                  10000             500,000
BBBB                  10001             300,000
However, when I tried to run the report in ALV format, the report aggregate the total by GL accounts which is not what I want (see below).
Company Code     GL account     Amount
'****                      10000             700,000
'****                      10001             400,000
Do you know if it is possible to generate a trial balance broken down by company code and GL accounts in ALV format? If yes, how do I do that?
Thanks,
Cassandra Wong

In the initial screen of F.01, if you select radio button 'ALV grid control' and select the layout as '1SAP' and execute, you will see the button Expand (Ctrl+F2) in the report - it is adjacent to the blue information button - you will see a + sign and the words 'Company Code' on that button. Even if you are not able to locate the button, just press CtrlF2 on your keyboard, the list will expand. You may not have company code in the layout - you can change it using the 'Change Layout (CtrlF8)' button and then by bringing 'Company Code' field from the Hidden Columns on the right to the Displayed Columns on the left.

Can we assign 1 credit control for multiple company codes

hi,
sap gurus,
good afternoon to all
can we assign 1 credit control area for multiple company codes.
if yes can any body explain the pro's and cons of the assignment.
if no can any body explain the why?
its urgent plz.......
regards,
balaji.t
09990019711

Yes Balaji,
We can assign.
Here the risk categiry and terms of one credit control area will be applicable to all company code.
Credit Control Area
Definition
An organizational unit that represents the area where customer credit is awarded and monitored.
This organizational unit can either be a single or several company codes, if credit control is
performed across several company codes. One credit control area contains credit control
information for each customer.
Use
Credit and risk management takes place in the credit control area. According to your corporate
requirements, you can implement credit management that is centralized, decentralized, or
somewhere in between.
For example, if your credit management is centralized, you can define one credit control
area for all of your company codes.
If, on the other hand, your credit policy requires decentralized credit management, you
can define credit control areas for each company code or each group of company codes.
Credit limits and credit exposure are managed at both credit control area and customer level.
You set up credit control areas and other data related to credit management in Customizing for
Financial Accounting. For more information, see the Implementation Guide under Enterprise
Structure Definition or Assignment Financial Accounting and then Maintain credit control
area. You assign customers to specific credit control areas and specify the appropriate credit
limits in the customer master record.
Thanks,
Raja

How to schedule one report for multiple company code?

How you can schedule reports in BW 3.5? Suppose I need to schedule one report for multiple company code, how can you do that and notify the users? I do not want to send multiple emails to the same user if the report runs for 20 times (for 20 different companies).
points are given for ASAP replies.
Thanks in advance
Peter

Dear Peter,
Try to restrict the Company Code with those 20 values and schedule.
Regards,
Ramkumar.

1099 misc file format not able to get for multiple WHT code??

Dear Experts,
I am trying to download the file format for 1099 misc IRS reporting for e-filling, i am getting the file for one WHT code 07. but when i am executing this transaction S_P00_07000134 for multiple WHT Code 01 to 14, in the file format, Amount entries are available for all the WHT Code but In the Record "A" only Account code "C" is coming. i have implemented the SAP Note 1666672 version 3 before executing this transaction. Please let me know this is a configuration issue or i am missing to apply other SAP Note. this is very high priority issue now.
Any comments on this are highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
Saurabh Saxena

I am seeing the same issue. This worked for us last year. But this year the A Record indicates that we only have Withholding code 7, yet our detail records have withholding amounts in columns 1, 6, and 7.
IRS rules state that multiple withholding codes should be concatenated in ascending order in the Header 'A'Record. This must be an issue with the 2011 DMEE file, IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml as this is the only thing that changed in the 2011 note.
Actually, I've just compared last year's IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml file with this year's, and in the part of the transformation where the withholding amount codes are concatenated, it appears a bug was introduced. I'm going to hand-edit my copy of the file to see if it resolves the issue, and I'll cross my fingers that SAP produces a 4th update to note 1666672
Edited by: Timothy Conama on Jan 19, 2012 1:45 AM

Which of the following is required for multiple Company Codes assigned to s

Which of the following is required for multiple Company Codes assigned to same Company ?
Same Chart of Accounts
Same Currency
Same Fiscal Year

hi,
if multiple companies are dependent on each other then you have to follow the below as same for all companies.
Same CoA
Same ItemMaster Data
Same WareHouses
Same BP Master Data
Same Currency
same fiscal year
and few more master datas which ever necessary.
if they are independant on each other then no need to maintain the same codes.
regards,
varma

Creating a Rebate agreement doc for multiple co codes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for