Creating repository service in informatica 8.6 takes too long

hi i have installed informatica server on windows vista and now loginto admin console and trying to create repository service using
configuration assistant .
i gave all the details database user/pwd /codepage/rep service name
it says
creating repository service (it may take few minutes)
its 40 minutes now and still not created
what might be the issue? the database user that i have specified is the same user for domain database. is that the problem ?
how long it will take to create the repository service?
regards
raj

Vista is not officially supported, there are some docs on workaround for Vista in Metalink3.
See some of these
http://technet.informatica.com/forum/installation-upgrades/topic/powercenter-install-error-vista
or for 8.6 see
http://technet.informatica.com/forum/general-discussions/topic/informatica-86-repository-service-configuration

Similar Messages

  • I can't create repository service in Informatica

    Hi All
    Informatica Powercenter 8.6.1
    I has try creating Repository Service in Informatica Powercenter Adminstration Console, but have error
    The Service Manager could not start the service due to the following error:
    Error - [PCSF_10342] Exception occurred: [Unable to start service [DB] on any node specified for the service.].
    please help
    best regards
    saranporn Phutta
    Edited by: user1108635 on 8 ก.ค. 2553, 19:36 น.

    hii all
    i have Informatica 8.6.1 and oracle 10g
    I has try creating Repository Service in Informatica Powercenter Adminstration Console, but have error
    The Service Manager could not start the service due to the following error:
    Error - [PCSF_10342] Exception occurred: [Unable to start service [DB] on any node specified for the service.].
    I restarted my system and tried again the repository service..and also i turned off the firewall in my system....
    but i have the same error...
    so please help to my solve this problem.
    thanks in advance..
    shankar

  • Error while creating Repository Service in informatica

    Hi Guys,
    When i try to create repository service informatica8.1.1.I'm getting the below error
    driverconnect.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close.We are sorry for the inconvenience.

    since your error message is not completely represented over here,my guess is you are not providing the exact repository name as what you mentioned during the installation.please chek the repository name that you provided
    for example : during installation the defualt repository name might been 'PowerCenter' and you might be entering some other repository name while connecting i.e 'Oracle_BI_DW_Base' .
    check this and let me known.

  • RPURMP00 program takes too long

    Hi Guys,
    Need some help on this one guys. Not getting any where with this issue.
    I am running RPURMP00 ( Program to  Create Third-Party Remittance Posting Run ) and while running it in test mode for 1 employee it takes too long .
    I ran this in background during off hours , but it takes 19,000 + sec to run and then cancels .
    The long text message is “No entry in table T51R6_FUNDINFO (Remittance detail table for all entities) for key 0002485844 “   and     “Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE”
    I check the program and I found a nested loop within the program (include RPURMP02 ) and decided to debug it with a break point.
    It short dumped and here is the st22 message and source code extract.
          ----Message -
    " Time limit exceeded ".
    "The program "RPURMP00" has exceeded the maximum permitted runtime without
    Interruption and has therefore been terminated."
          ----Source code extract -
    Include RPURMP02
      172 &----                   
      173 *&      Form  get_advice_info                                                               
      174 &----                   
      175 *       text                                                                               
    176 ----                   
      177 *  -->  p1        text                                                                     
      178 *  <--  p2        text                                                                      
      179 ----                   
      180 FORM get_advice_info .                                                                     
      181                                                                               
    182 * get information for advice form only if vendor sub-group and                             
      183 * employee detail is maintained                                                             
      184   IF ( NOT t51rh-lifsg IS INITIAL ) AND                                                    
      185      ( NOT t51rh-hrper IS INITIAL ).                                                       
      186                                                                               
    187 *   get remittance items employee number                                                   
      188     SELECT * FROM t51r4 WHERE remky = t51r5-remky. "#EC CI_GENBUFF "SAM0632658             
      189 *     get payroll seqno determined by PERNR and RDATN                                      
    >>>>>       SELECT * FROM t51r8 WHERE pernr = t51r4-pernr                                        
      191                             AND rdatn = t51r5-rdatn                                        
      192                             ORDER BY PRIMARY KEY. "#EC CI_GENBUFF                          
      193         EXIT.                                                                               
    194       ENDSELECT.                                                                               
    Has anyone ever come across this situation? Any input from anyone on this?
    Regards.
    CJ

    Hi,
    What is your SAP version?
    Have you checked if some OSS notes is there on performance.
    Regards,
    Atish

  • AME CS6 rendering with AE and Pr takes too long

    Hi Guys,
    Need some help here. i have rendered a 30 secs mp4 video with 1920 x 1080 HD format 25 frames w/o scripting in AME for 4 hours!
    Why does it take too long? I have rendered a 2 minute video with same format w/ scripting but only spare less than 30 minutes for rendering.
    Im using After Effects and Premium Pro both CS6 and using Dynamic Link in AME.
    What seems to be wrong in my current settings?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks!

    This may be a waste of time, but it won't take a minute and is something you should always do whenever things go strangely wrong  ............ trash the preferences, assuming you haven't done it already.
    Many weird things happen as a result of corrupt preferences which can create a vast range of different symptoms, so whenever FCP X stops working properly in any way, trashing the preferences should be the first thing you do using this free app.
    http://www.digitalrebellion.com/prefman/
    Shut down FCP X, open PreferenceManager and in the window that appears:-
    1. Ensure that only  FCP X  is selected.
    2. Click Trash
    The job is done instantly and you can re-open FCP X.
    There is absolutely no danger in trashing preferences and you can do it as often as you like.
    The preferences are kept separately from FCP X and if there aren't any when FCP X opens it automatically creates new ones  .  .  .  instantly.

  • Sql Query takes too long to enter into the first line

    Hi Friends,
      I am using SQLServer 2008. I am running the query for fetching the data from database. when i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second) to enter into first
    line of the stored procedure. After its enter into the first statement of the SP, its fetching the data within a second. I think there is no problem with Sqlquery.  Kindly let me know if you know the reason behind this.
    Sample Example:
    Create Sp Sp_Name
    as
     Begin
     print Getdate()
      Sql statements for fetching datas
     Print Getdate()
     End
    In the above example, there is no difference between first date and second date.
    Please help me to trouble shooting this problem.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajkumar.R

     i am running first time after executed the "DBCC FREEPROCCACHE" query for clear cache memory, it takes too long (7 to 9 second)
    Additional to Manoj: A
    DBCC FREEPROCCACHE clears the procedure cache, so all store procedure must be newly compilied on the first call.
    Olaf Helper
    [ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP]

  • Query designer takes too long to save a query

    Hi dear SDN friends.
    I´m working with query designer in BI 7 and sometimes it takes too long to save a query, about ten minutes. Sometimes it never ends saving and some other times it saves the same query in 1 minute.
    Can anybody please give an advice about this behavior of the query designer?
    We have recently update BI to sp18. In query designer I have sp5 revision 529
    Best regards,
    Karim Reyes

    Hello Karim,
    I would suggest testing this again in the latest Frontend Patch available (FEP 602).  In FEPs 600, 601, & 602 there were some performance and stability improvements made which may correct your issue.  If the issue persists, I would suggest then opening a Customer Message via Service Marketplace.
    It can be downloaded from:
        http://service.sap.com/swdc
    u2192Download
    u2192Support Packages and Patches
    u2192Entry by Application Group
    u2192SAP Frontend Components
    u2192BI ADDON FOR SAPGUI
    u2192 BI 7.0 ADDON FOR SAPGUI 7.10
    u2192 BI 7.0 ADDON FOR SAPGUI 7.10
    u2192Win32
    See SAP Note 1085218 for planned FEP releases.
    I hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Tanner Spaulding
    SAP NetWeaver RIG Americas, BI

  • Quantity conversion takes too long

    Dear Gurus,
    I'm having a problem with the query execution time when I convert the quantities of the materials in KGs.
    I have done all the steps to set up material conversion with reference infoobject 0material and using a dynamic determination of conversion factor using central units of measurement (T006) otherwise reference infoobject.
    With these settings the query takes too long to execute because of the large number of material codes. If I remove this conversion the query is executed very fast.
    Any ideas? Do I have to create an index in UOM0MATE ODS? What am I missing here?
    Regards,
    Panos

    Hi Panos,
    I had the same issue, but it's solved for me now. I tried the same way you did, by creating a secondary index on the active table of the DSO. The only difference is, that I included all the SID fields to the index.
    Did you mark your index as unique? Also make sure, that the index really is created on the DB.
    If the performance still is not getting better, check in RSRT the statistics if the unit conversion really is the problem.
    Kindly regards,
    Matthias

  • Event Viewer cannot open the event Log or Custom view. Verify that the Event log service is running or query is too long. The instance name passed was not recognized as valid by a WMI data provider(4201).

    "Event Viewer cannot open the event Log or Custom view. Verify that the Event log service is running or query is too long. The instance name passed was not recognized as valid by a WMI data provider(4201)"
    This error keeps cropping up now and again on most of our domain controllers (OS-2008 AND 2008R2)...Usually a restart fixes the issue however the issue repeats and security logs don't generate.
    Any advice on how to fix this issue permanently would be greatly appreciated.

    Please see this: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/95987ca3-a1b2-4da6-95b7-d825d06cdac7/error-code-4201-the-instance-name-passed-was-not-recognized-as-valid-by-a-wmi-data-provider?forum=w7itprosecurity
    You can also try rebuilding the WMI repository: http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2009/04/13/wmi-rebuilding-the-wmi-repository.aspx
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Business Rules Project Takes Too Long to Open

    Does anyone know why it takes too long (~3-5 minutes) to open/edit a security project definded for assigning business rules to planning application forms? We are using Hyperion v11.1.1.3.0. Essbase is on Windows server, Shared Services on Solaris 10 Unix. Even before we migrated Essbase to Windows to gain better performance running calcs, opening projects using EAS has always been very slow to open. Please advice if there is a way to improve performance on this.

    Clear Cookies & Cache
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Template:clearCookiesCache
    Clear the Network Cache
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/How%20to%20clear%20the%20cache#w_clear-the-cache
    Firefox takes a long time to start up
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/firefox-takes-long-time-start-up
    Check and tell if its working.

  • OIM11g managed server startup takes too long

    I am running a OIM11g managed server using weblogic on windows xp; in development mode
    My managed server takes too long to startup; averaging atleast an hour at the minimum.
    I am attaching the logs from the server between the time frame when it took the longest time.
    Can someone please help me to improve the startup.
    Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

    <9:32:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-ejb.jar>
    <9:45:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '23' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
    <9:45:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
    <10:00:06 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
    <10:00:07 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
    <10:15:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
    <10:15:41 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
    <10:30:11 PM> <Info> <JDBC><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "mds-oim" closed.>
    <10:30:15 PM> <Info> <Common><oim1> <MDSPollingThread-[oim, jdbc/mds/MDS_REPOS]> <anonymous> <BEA-000628> <Created "1" resources for pool "mds-oim", out of which "1" are available and "0" are unavailable.>
    <10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
    <10:32:44 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
    <10:33:08 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'dataobjects-ejb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
    <10:33:14 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: dataobjects-ejb.jar>
    <10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module dataobjects-ejb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
    <10:38:10 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
    <10:38:10 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
    <10:38:11 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'iam-async-mdb.jar' with uri, 'META-INF/weblogic-ejb-jar.xml'. The plan was merged.>
    <10:38:11 PM> <Info> <EJB><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-010008> <EJB Deploying file: iam-async-mdb.jar>
    <10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149060> <Module iam-async-mdb.jar of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] successfully transitioned from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
    <10:38:13 PM> <Info> <Deployer><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-149059> <Module xlWebApp of application oim [Version=11.1.1.3.0] is transitioning from STATE_NEW to STATE_PREPARED on server oim_server1.>
    <10:38:13 PM> <Info> <J2EE><oim1> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <WLS Kernel> <BEA-160166> <References were found in deployment plan for module 'xlWebApp.war' with uri, 'WEB-INF/web.xml'. The plan was merged.>
    Edited by: 838243 on Feb 20, 2011 10:22 AM

  • 11gR2:crsctl, srvctl commands takes too long to respond

    Hi,
    I have successfully configured *11gR2 two node RAC on ASM on Win 2008 64bit.*
    Everything work very well like connecting to database, querying database. Node restart also takes acceptable time to go down & restart the clusterware & database.
    But when I execute crsctl status resource -t or srvctl status database -d db_name commands from any node takes 10-15min to give output.
    They give output & everything completes successfully but takes too long to respond.
    The questions are:
    - If everything works fine then why crsctl, srvctl takes too long to respond?
    - what could be blocking these command to gather clusterware and database status on all nodes?
    - what additional info would be helpful that I can provide?

    dag wrote:
    I dont have this issue either. are you auto starting mpd?
    that time is how long it is up in other words you opened it then closed it at that time
    I'm not sure if you are referring to me or not, but in my screenshot I am timing the lag in ncmpcpp by pressing 'q' in the terminal during the delay, so it quits ncmpcpp immediately after the lag. The lag is longer for ncmpc because the interface loads before the program connects to mpd, so I have to stop it manually immediatly after it connects.
    WonderWoofy wrote:I don't have this problem... if you are starting it as a systemd user service, maybe there is relevant information in the journal.
    The journal did not reveal anything relevant sadly. I have now tried launching mpd without systemd, and the lag remains. I have also noticed that a small mpd programming project I am writing also experiences the same lag when it tries to connect to mpd.

  • Sometimes my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I am running a pretty powerful work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network, is it a hard drive issue? do I need to "clean out" the computer?

    Many times my computer takes too long to connect to new website. I have wireless internet (time capsule) and I am running a pretty powerful real time financial work program at same time, what is the best solution? Upgrading speed from cable network? is it a hard drive issue? do I only need to "clean out" the computer? Or all of the above...not to computer saavy.  It is a Macbook Pro  osx 10.6.8 (late 2010).

    Almost certainly none of the above!  Try each of the following in this order:
    Select 'Reset Safari' from the Safari menu.
    Close down Safari;  move <home>/Library/Caches/com.apple.Safari/Cache.db to the trash; restart Safari.
    Change the DNS servers in your network settings to use the OpenDNS servers: 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220
    Turn off DNS pre-fetching by entering the following command in Terminal and restarting Safari:
              defaults write com.apple.safari WebKitDNSPrefetchingEnabled -boolean false

  • Accessing BKPF table takes too long

    Hi,
    Is there another way to have a faster and more optimized sql query that will access the table BKPF? Or other smaller tables that contain the same data?
    I'm using this:
       select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart
       into corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
       from bkpf
       where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
       and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
       and blart in so_DocTypes
       and monat in so_monat.
    The report is taking too long and is eating up a lot of resources.
    Any helpful advice is highly appreciated. Thanks!

    Hi max,
    I also tried using BUDAT in the where clause of my sql statement, but even that takes too long.
        select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
         appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
         from bkpf
         where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
         and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
         and blart in so_DocTypes
         and budat in so_budat.
    I also tried accessing the table per day, but it didn't worked too...
       while so_budat-low le so_budat-high.
         select bukrs gjahr belnr budat blart monat
         appending corresponding fields of table i_bkpf
         from bkpf
         where bukrs eq pa_bukrs
         and gjahr eq pa_gjahr
         and blart in so_DocTypes
         and budat eq so_budat-low.
         so_budat-low = so_budat-low + 1.
       endwhile.
    I think our BKPF tables contains a very large set of data. Is there any other table besides BKPF where we could get all accounting document numbers in a given period?

  • Report Takes Too Long Time

    Hi!
    I am in troubble
    following is the query
    SELECT inv_no, inv_name, inv_desc, i.cat_id, cat_name, i.sub_cat_id,
    sub_cat_name, asset_cost, del_date, i.bl_id, gen_desc bl_desc, p.prvcode, prvdesc, cur_loc,
    pldesc, i.pmempno, pmname, i.empid, empname
    FROM inv_reg i,
    cat_reg c,
    sub_cat_reg s,
    gen_desc_reg g,
    ploc p,
    province r,
    pmaster m,
    iemp_reg e
    WHERE i.sub_cat_id = s.sub_cat_id
    AND i.cat_id = s.cat_id
    AND s.cat_id = c.cat_id
    AND i.bl_id = g.gen_id
    AND i.cur_loc = p.plcode
    AND p.prvcode = r.prvcode
    AND i.pmempno = m.pmempno(+)
    AND i.empid = e.empid(+)
    &wc
    order by prvdesc, pldesc, cat_name, sub_cat_name, inv_no
    and this query returns 32000 records
    when i run this query on reports 10g
    then it takes 10 to 20 minuts to generate report
    how can i optimize it...?

    Hi Waqas Attari
    Pls study & try this ....
    When your query takes too long ...
    hope it helps....
    Regards,
    Abdetu...

Maybe you are looking for