Creating text boxes is causing VERY slow performance

i've read the threads about how slow indesign cc has been from last year. i would assume this issue had been fixed by now, so i just switched our
whole company over from cs5 to cc. we are a prinitng company that makes calendars with many text boxes, and indesign cc is about 1/2 as fast
as cs5 was in creating these from scratch. i've noticed the more text boxes, whether used or blank, causes it to slow even more. i can't do anything
without it lagging and pausing, which is not productive whatsoever.
is there any fix at all to this or is this ever going to be fixed? i have found no solution.
we have 32 gb ram and decently fast macs (not the newest but decent), but processing speed can't be the issue when it seems everyone is having these same problems. (we do not have retina dislplays, just normal samsung monitors)
we have tried saving new files out as the new cc version but that doesn't help.
try it for yourself. make an 8 1/2 X 11 document with 100 step and repeated text boxes. even left blank, the whole programs slows down.
i need help, or else i have no choice but to roll everyone back to cs5.

You did receive the file. You already replied to me about the issue. See below.
Since I have last spoken with you I did download os 10.7.5, and I will work with it today to see if it's any faster. Unfortunately as I predicted it "broke" 2 of our other powerpc applications that I absolutely have to have, so that's a whole other set of issues that this has caused me.
I will let you know if I still have the same performance issues. This is the last thing I can try because I cannot upgrade this mac to 10.8. If the performance isn't better I guess I'll just be forced to go back to CS5.
Chris Smith
Drum-Line Graphics Dept. Manager
800-284-2456 Ext. 133
Hi Chris,
We are officially NOT supporting 10.6.8. The official supported platforms of Mac are 10.7 onwards.
I too would recommend that you upgrade as we haven't performed much testing on 10.6.8. It currently works but the outcome may not be nice as you are already facing.
Maybe you can try upgrading to 10.7 or 10.8, your mac may support these platforms and so does InDesign.
Thanks
Javed

Similar Messages

InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text

InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text.
Running on 2010 Macpro 2.4GHz. 8GB RAM. Any solutions? I've read through many forums on this and tried several fixes.

Have exact same issue on my Windows 7 machine. Resetting preferences is a workaround.
So I start InDesign whilst holding down these keys.
Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or Cmd + Ctrl + Opt + Shift (Mac)
Whilst inDesign is usable again with this fix- I have to do it every time so it trashes all my preferences so NOT GOOD long term fix. Otherwise InDesign freezes and can only be stopped by forcing a quit.
I have manually deleted the preference files and I have created a brand new admin account - but still no luck - will be onto support tomorrow

Formatted Search with DI leads to a very slow performance - HELP....

Hello There
I have defined some formatted search in OPCH - everything is working fine.
I have added some logic to this form via the DI.(handlling 1 item press_event), and I get a very very slow performance - the ADDON-EXE jumps TO 230MEGA of memory, and entering values to each row in the tables/item in the form takes about 15 seconds.
Any suggestions?
RGDS
HAGAI

Hi Hagai,
Normally an addon written using the DI would take up 60-80MBs.
Are you filtering out all events except for the item press event for the form? If you are not filtering events then this can have quite a drastic affect on performance.
What logic have you got behind the press event? If the addon exe is ballooning out to 230MB then it suggests that there is either a problem with a memory leak or that an error is occuring in the code. I would recommend putting try/catch clauses at suitable places in the code and maybe specifically setting objects to null and calling the .NET garbage collector to try and minimise the potential for memory leaks.
Are you sure that it is the combination of the formatted search and the addon that is causing the problem, i.e. if you take away the formatted search but leave the addon do you still get poor performance or does everything speed up?
Hope this helps,
Owen

Very slow performance, need assistance

I have a program that has very slow performance (and I mean SLOW). I was hoping somebody could tell me how to improve the performance. I know where it hangs up (at LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.) but I'm not sure what I need to do to make it quicker. Any help would be appreciated.
TABLES: vbak,
        vbpa,
        adrc.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_detail,
         vbeln TYPE vbak-vbeln,
         erdat TYPE vbak-erdat,
         vdatu TYPE vbak-vdatu,
         adrnr TYPE vbpa-adrnr,
         sa_name TYPE adrc-name1,
         sa_street TYPE adrc-street,
         sa_city TYPE adrc-city1,
         sa_state TYPE adrc-region,
         sa_zip TYPE adrc-post_code1,
         sa_tel TYPE adrc-tel_number,
         kunnr TYPE vbpa-kunnr,
         ag_name TYPE kna1-name1,
         ag_street TYPE kna1-stras,
         ag_city TYPE kna1-ort01,
         ag_state TYPE kna1-regio,
         ag_zip TYPE kna1-pstlz,
         ag_tel TYPE kna1-telf1,
         vkbur TYPE knvv-vkbur,
         we_num TYPE likp-kunnr,
         we_name TYPE kna1-name1,
         we_name2 TYPE kna1-name2,
         we_street TYPE kna1-stras,
         we_city TYPE kna1-ort01,
         we_state TYPE kna1-regio,
         we_zip TYPE kna1-pstlz,
         we_tel TYPE kna1-telf1,
       END OF ty_detail.
DATA: it_detail TYPE TABLE OF ty_detail WITH KEY vbeln adrnr kunnr we_num,
      wa_detail LIKE LINE OF it_detail.
DATA: addressnum TYPE vbpa-adrnr,
      temp_kunnr TYPE likp-kunnr.
* S E L E C T I O N - S C R E E N
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK required WITH FRAME TITLE text-002.
SELECT-OPTIONS: s_vdatu FOR vbak-vdatu OBLIGATORY.    "Req delivery date
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK required.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK temp WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
SELECT-OPTIONS: s_auart FOR vbak-auart OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETER: p_parfun TYPE vbpa-parvw DEFAULT 'Z5' OBLIGATORY.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK temp.
*INITIALIZATION.
* REFRESH s_auart.
* CLEAR s_auart.
* s_auart-sign = 'I'.
* s_auart-option = 'EQ'.
* s_auart-low = 'OR'.
* APPEND s_auart.
* s_auart-low = 'ZDT'.
* APPEND s_auart.
* END OF SELECTION SCREEN
* M A I N - B O D Y
*Main select statement.
SELECT a~vbeln a~erdat a~vdatu c~adrnr c~kunnr
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_detail
    FROM vbak AS a
      INNER JOIN vbap AS b
          ON b~vbeln = a~vbeln
      INNER JOIN vbpa AS c
          ON c~vbeln = b~vbeln
*          AND c~posnr = b~posnr
               WHERE a~auart IN s_auart
               AND a~vdatu IN s_vdatu
               AND c~parvw = p_parfun.
LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.
SELECT SINGLE name1 street city1 region post_code1 tel_number
      FROM adrc INTO (wa_detail-sa_name, wa_detail-sa_street, wa_detail-sa_city, wa_detail-sa_state,
                        wa_detail-sa_zip, wa_detail-sa_tel)
      WHERE addrnumber = wa_detail-adrnr.
SELECT SINGLE name1 stras ort01 regio pstlz telf1
      FROM kna1 INTO (wa_detail-ag_name, wa_detail-ag_street, wa_detail-ag_city, wa_detail-ag_state,
                        wa_detail-ag_zip, wa_detail-ag_tel)
      WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-kunnr.
SELECT SINGLE c~kunnr INTO temp_kunnr
      FROM vbpa AS a
          INNER JOIN lips AS b
            ON b~vgbel = a~vbeln
          INNER JOIN likp AS c
            ON c~vbeln = b~vbeln
            WHERE a~vbeln = wa_detail-vbeln.
wa_detail-we_num = temp_kunnr.
SELECT SINGLE name1 name2 stras ort01 regio pstlz telf1
      FROM kna1 INTO (wa_detail-we_name, wa_detail-we_name2, wa_detail-we_street, wa_detail-we_city, wa_detail-we_state,
                        wa_detail-we_zip, wa_detail-we_tel)
      WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-we_num.
SELECT SINGLE vkbur FROM knvv INTO wa_detail-vkbur
      WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-kunnr.
MODIFY it_detail FROM wa_detail.
ENDLOOP.
PERFORM display.
INCLUDE zpartner_displayf01.
Regards,
Davis

Hi Davis,
The culprit is the select inside the loop.
YOu should use for all entries instead .
I will show for one select, you do similar thing for others:
SELECT addrnumber name1 street city1 region post_code1 tel_number
      FROM adrc INTO table itab_adrc
for all entries in it_detail
      WHERE addrnumber = it_detail-adrnr.
sort itab-adrc by addrnumber.
LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.
read table it_adrc with key addrnumber = wa_detail-adrnr.
if sy-subrc = 0.
move fiedls of it_adrc into wa_detail.
endif.
ENDLOOP.

Acrobat very Slow performance (50% CPU usage)

My acrobat 9 PRO (9.3.2) has suddently started to use 50% of my CPU usage everytime a *.pdf document is opened.
It is the task Acrobat.exe which is the problem. This results in VERY slow performance and I cannot use the review function without adobe is crashing!
This has not always been a problem!
Does anyone know why this is happening?
I have tried to uninstall and reinstall acrobat, without any luck!
Thanks
Peder

You probably have the same problem as I do. I use version 9.3.3 on a fairly powerful machine with Windows vista. In my case, the problem is related to the weblink.api (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/675941?tstart=0). I also uninstalled, reinstalled, repaired - nothing helps.

Lion: very slow performance of my macbook pro

very slow performance.
went to terminal, did the top command, and got following results (mind you, ONLY have Safari and of course Terminal open):
Processes: 96 total, 4 running, 9 stuck, 83 sleeping, 419 threads      19:07:17
Load Avg: 1.99, 1.81, 1.59 CPU usage: 2.36% user, 5.21% sys, 92.41% idle
SharedLibs: 1660K resident, 0B data, 0B linkedit.
MemRegions: 15947 total, 2662M resident, 47M private, 209M shared.
PhysMem: 695M wired, 2175M active, 1083M inactive, 3953M used, 13M free.
VM: 250G vsize, 1093M framework vsize, 699065(68) pageins, 1724738(881) pageouts
Networks: packets: 70104/55M in, 66648/10M out.
Disks: 966630/9347M read, 327765/18G written.
PID   COMMAND      %CPU TIME     #TH #WQ #POR #MREG RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE
4058 top          5.2   00:03.32 1/1 0    28   29    912K   216K   1620K
4055 bash         0.0   00:00.02 1    0    20   23    356K   216K   1112K
4052 CVMCompiler 0.0   00:00.30 1    0    30   69    7780K 220K   16M
4051 login        0.0   00:00.08 2    1    33   63    928K   216K   2184K
4049 Terminal     0.3   00:01.34 7    3    128+ 164+ 7580K+ 13M    15M+
4042 ocspd        0.0   00:00.02 1    0    26   33    420K+ 276K   1376K+
4041 WebProcess   0.0   00:04.35 7    3    119 201   16M-   10M    26M-
4039 Safari       1.1   00:09.44 12   3    193 413   47M-   20M    81M-
3958 spindump_age 0.0   00:00.02 2    2    38   55    356K   220K   1100K
3956 spindump     1.3   00:42.93 16/1 13   228 145   46M+   15M    53M+
3953 aosnotifyd   0.0   00:00.18 3    1    53   279   2064K 3532K 6156K
3939 AddressBookM 6.8   06:59.11 4    1    68   4067+ 2131M- 3308K 1554M-
3895 lsboxd       0.0   00:00.06 2    2    49   69    1156K 6820K 3292K
3031 cookied      0.0   00:01.36 2    1    42   82    2028K 268K   3
every minute or so the computer blocks, every 3 or 4 hours I have to restart etc.
any suggestions?

ok, stopped syncing in System preferences and even (horror) deleted the file which reappeared in seconds.
now waiting to see if stopping the syncing helps - though computer is now working a bit better, the info on Activity Monitor would indicate it is not a real improvement
473           AddressBookMobileMeSharingAgent          me          1,4          4          1.020,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
312           helpd          me          0,4          65          358,9 MB          Intel (64 bit)
0           kernel_task          root          1,1          76          336,6 MB          Intel (64 bit)
459           Mail          me          0,4          9          276,2 MB          Intel (64 bit)
194           java          root          0,1          30          162,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)
405           Safari          me          0,5          12          120,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
407           Safari Web Content          me          0,2          7          100,3 MB          Intel (64 bit)
195           WindowServer          _windowserver          0,5          7          64,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)

E50 very slow performance

my E50 is giving very slow performance anyway to tune it up ?? dosn't hangs but its slow ?? any solution ps whats the best antivirus to install in E50 ?

I don't use your same workflow, and I assume you're shooting RAW. However, after I have built 1:1 previews in LR (which takes a LONG time), when I click on a file to decide if it's sharp or not, it still takes 5-10 seconds for each file to load. And my computer isn't slow, and I have the same issue on my laptop, which is new and fast. I haven't seen a satisfactory answer to this problem, nor much acknowledgement from Adobe. My files are from a Nikon D7100 with 24 megapixels, so the file size is likely a factor.
If you are shooting the type of subjects where you use 1:1 previews primarily to determine sharpness, you could consider Photo Mechanic (unfortunately it costs $150) as the first step in your workflow. It uses the embedded jpg files in the RAW file, so it loads 1:1 jpg previews almost instantly. Sports and nature photographers use this product all the time, mostly to delete losers.

Very slow performance in Lightroom 3??

I just upgraded to Lightroom 3.0 and I am very suprised how slow it is!?! I don't have a very large library and I'm on two reasonably new computers yet the difference from Lightroom 2 (snappy performance) to Lightroom 3 (VERY sluggish) is quite suprising..
I'm using it on a XP and a Vista system with the same results...
Is anyone else experiencing this???
Thanks,
Ken

I've noticed a slow down in performance with Lightroom 3 as well. As far a looking around the forum for older threads, ...found older lightroom 1 and 2 threads.
Your Title "Very Slow Performance in Lightroom 3??" fits what I'm looking for just perfectly.
Jim

Very slow performance; external boot drive the cause?

Greetings.
I bought a 500 GB Hitachi drive for my iMac intending to install it myself. But, alas, I have an iSight iMac and I think it's beyond my ability to do the job. A Mac dealer nearby can do it for me, but wants the computer for two or three days, even thought the installation takes about an hour. They will not make an appointment for me to come in with it and wait.
So I installed it the drive in an OWC Mercury Elite case, cloned the original drive, and have been booting from the Hitachi via Firewire 400. Just about everything is running at well under previous speeds. Lightroom now takes as much as two to five minutes to spool a large file for printing and sometimes does not even send the file to the printer (in fairness, the latter issue happened sometimes with the internal drive – I wrote about it here before – but at least it didn't take a long time to spool the file, which has to happen each time I click "print" until at last it actually goes to the printer).
I'm getting slow performance from Safari (4.1.3), Mail (2.1.3), Lighroom 2, Photoshop (CS3). I can't say I've noticed problems elsewhere, but I rarely use other applications.
I have done all the usual maintenance tasks, besides those the computer does automatically. Repaired permissions. Emptied caches. Burned sage. Etc.
If this is the inevitable result of running from an external disk, then I'll have to brave the installation or pay someone to do it (which I would do immediately if I knew someone who would do it "while-u-wait").
If, however, this sounds like booting from the external drive should not be the problem, and there is something I might do to speed things up, I'd be grateful for your suggestions.
As always, thank you.
Leonard B.

Too bad about the site redesign. I had a draft of this message started, then got busy. Now I have no idea where to look for it. (And what happened to the Preview function?)
ANYWAY… I talked to a tech person at Other World Computing about the problem. He was of the opinion that the iMac SHOULD be showing some slower response if booted from the external drive, but that maybe the sluggishness in this case was excessive. He had me run a hardware scan to see whether there were any bad blocks. After 24 hours, Speed Tools reported no problems. So now I have run every diagnostic and repair tool I know of and every one that was suggested (every one that I own, that is), and the computer is still hesitating so much that I just have to get up and walk away from it sometimes in order to stay sane.
I am booting from the original hard drive when I have to do extended internet research (Safari being the biggest speed offender), but run the iMac from the external drive when I have to do photo editing, since all my preferences, Lightroom libraries, etc., are located there. If I had the time to figure out just where the essential, and relevant, system and application files are located, I suppose that I could copy them and move them onto the internal drive. Then I could just use the external for storage of the image files (can't do that on the internal; there's not enough space). However, if what is going on (slowness issue) is indicative of a faulty drive, I'd rather not use it at all, even as a storage or backup drive.
Any thoughts? Do you suppose this might be a problem with the computer, not with the new drive? I'd hate to ask OWC to exchange it (even if they would do that) and then find out I've got the same trouble.
Thanks again in advance.
Leonard

Very slow performance when assigning value to a form item

Dear all,
I have an add-on form that contains 30 text edits. I did not creat the from with screen painter but positioned them by marking each item's top and left position in the new sub.
I have named them as 'edBox1', 'edBox2'......, 'edBox30'
At a point I need to assign value to each edit text, I have queried the content from DB into one recordset. However, when I start to assign values to each edit text, the performance became very slow.
my code is as follow
me.form.items.item("edBox1").Specific.String = recordset.field.item(0).value.tostring
me.form.items.item("edBox30").Specific.String = recordset.field.item(29).value.tostring
I found that B1 seem to iterate each item on the form in order to find the item I specified.
so I think I should specificy items earler.
Now for each item I dim an object for it at new sub
Dim oedBox1 As SAPbouiCOM.EditText
Dim oedBox30 As SAPbouiCOM.EditText
and while creating forms, I specificy each item to the matched object
Then I assign values to items by
oedBox1.String = recRetrive.Fields.Item(0).Value.ToString
oedBox30.String = recRetrive.Fields.Item(29).Value.ToString
However, B1 still iterates to find the item and the performance is still slow, does anyone has a better solution to this issue? please kindly advise.
Thank you
Alan
Edited by: Chih-Peng Chen on Dec 17, 2007 8:42 AM

Hi Chen,
you can find one example under SDK samples which will guide on using datasources
Bind the controls to dbdataource and then query the datasource.
then update form using oForm.Update(),this will automatically fill the values in all edit boxes and it will be very fast as well
Hope it helps you
Regards
Vishnu

VERY slow performance with CS4 + Save for web

Note: I have done a search for similar issues but can find nothing regarding CS4 and this particular issue. I'm using a MacBook Pro 2.4Ghz w/4GB of RAM and resources are aplenty when the issue occurs.
Issue
My problem is that under certain circumstances the 'save as web' function can take upto 3 minutes before the diaglog box appears. I've had this for some time but only in the last couple of days did I notice something that might be relevant:
Works
1. Open 3 large TIFF files @ 120mb approx (mine are 3 processed RAW files from Capture One / 4200x5600@300dpi)
2. Create a new adjustment layer for each image
3. Resize each image to 72dpi @ 800x600
4. Run a SmartSharpen & flatten layers
5. In each tab (for each image) do 'save as web'
6. 'Save as web' dialog appears in expected time
VERY slow
1. Open 3 large TIFF files @ 120mb approx (mine are 3 processed RAW files from Capture One / 4200x5600@300dpi)
2. Create a new adjustment layer for each image
3. Resize each image to 72dpi @ 800x600
4. Run a SmartSharpen & flatten layers for each image
5. In first tab do 'save as web'
6. 'Save as web' dialog appears in expected time
7. Close this document (tab)
8. Go to the next image (tab) and do 'save as web'
9. Dialog box can take anything from 20secs to 3mins to appear.
10. Close this document (tab)
11. Go to the last image (tab) and do 'save as web'
12. Dialog box can take anything from 20secs to 3mins to appear.
As I can easily go through this process for 50-60 images you can imagine that it can waste over an hour of my time waiting for Photoshop to get it's act together. I assume it's something todo with memory allocation, or that it's processing previews for all three tabs on the first 'save as web', but in any respect it's very annoying. There seems nothing obviously wrong resource-wise at the time of doing these.
Would be interested if anyone else has this issue!
Thanks!

I had the same problem when I setup a new computer this week. Here's what I had installed:
Photoshop CS5
Suitcase Fusion 3
The problem was that when I was in Photoshop and used the "Save for Web" export screen, the dropdown menu for the different export types (JPG, PNG, GIF, etc) would take an extremely long time to update the preview of the graphic.
After a few days of research , I found that Suitcase was conflicting with Photoshop. Here's how you fix the problem (or at least here's what I did with my situation):
Open Suitcase
Go to "Tools", click "Manage Plugins"
Deactivate the Photoshop plugin
This fixed the problem immediately and now my Photoshop" Save For Web" feature is working really fast. Hope this helps anyone else in the same boat.

InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance, almost unusable.

Hello All,
Running InDesign CC 2014 on Mid 2010 Mac Pro, 2.4GHz, 36GB RAM, OSX 10.9.4.
When moving an image or text box InDesign hangs and beach ball spins. I've removed preferences, cleaned Mac cache and ran Onyx. Still slow with InDesign. Other CC apps work fine.
I have the same Apps and set up on 4 other MacPros with no issues.
Does anyone have a solution or a work round?
Thanks

Have exact same issue on my Windows 7 machine. Resetting preferences is a workaround.
So I start InDesign whilst holding down these keys.
Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or Cmd + Ctrl + Opt + Shift (Mac)
Whilst inDesign is usable again with this fix- I have to do it every time so it trashes all my preferences so NOT GOOD long term fix. Otherwise InDesign freezes and can only be stopped by forcing a quit.
I have manually deleted the preference files and I have created a brand new admin account - but still no luck - will be onto support tomorrow

Creating ImageIcon from Image is very slow

Hi I have a program which reads a number of files which may contain (amongst other things) image data in various formats such as JPG.I read scale this down into an image object fine, and then I want to display a small version of it on screen so I put the scale dimage into an ImageIcon which i display later using a JLabel.
Anyway it runs very slow , the funny thing is using JProbe Ive tracked the problem down to creation of the ImageIcon constructor, the actual thumbnail image creation is very quick.
Why does ImageIcon take so long or is there a simple way of displaying the image in a Swing Application
without using JLabel.
BufferedImage bi = ImageIO.read(new DataInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(imageData)));
Image thumbnaiImage = image.getScaledInstance(20,20Image.SCALE_FAST);
ImageIcon thumbnail     = new ImageIcon(thumbnailImage);

If you're not too picky about the image quality (and I see you're using SCALE_FAST), you can set the
source subsampling on your ImageReadParam so that you never construct the large image: you start
with the thumbnail.
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.image.*;
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
import javax.imageio.*;
import javax.swing.*;
public class AllThumbs {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws MalformedURLException {
        String prefix = "http://www3.us.porsche.com/english/usa/carreragt/modelinformation/experience/desktop/bilder/icon";
        String suffix = "_800x600.jpg";
        JPanel p = new JPanel(new GridLayout(0,3));
        for(int i=1; i<9; ++i) {
            try {
                p.add(getThumb(new URL(prefix + i + suffix), 200, 150));
            } catch (IOException e) {
                System.out.println(e.getMessage());
        JFrame f = new JFrame("AllThumbs");
        f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
        f.getContentPane().add(p);
        f.pack();
        f.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
        f.setVisible(true);
    public static JLabel getThumb(URL url, int maxWidth, int maxHeight) throws IOException {
        String suffix = getSuffix(url);
        Iterator readers = ImageIO.getImageReadersBySuffix(suffix);
        if (!readers.hasNext())
            throw new IOException("No reader for suffix " + suffix);
        ImageReader reader = (ImageReader) readers.next();
        reader.setInput(ImageIO.createImageInputStream(url.openStream()), true, true);
        int w = reader.getWidth(0), h = reader.getHeight(0);
        int subsampling = Math.max(1, Math.max(w/maxWidth, h/maxHeight));
        ImageReadParam param = reader.getDefaultReadParam();
        param.setSourceSubsampling(subsampling, subsampling, 0, 0);
        BufferedImage image = reader.read(0, param);
        String path = url.getPath();
        String text = path.substring(1+path.lastIndexOf('/'));
        JLabel label = new JLabel(text, new ImageIcon(image), SwingConstants.CENTER);
        label.setHorizontalTextPosition(SwingConstants.CENTER);
        label.setVerticalTextPosition(SwingConstants.BOTTOM);
        label.setBorder(BorderFactory.createEmptyBorder(5,5,5,5));
        return label;
    public static String getSuffix(URL url) throws IOException {
        String path = url.getPath();
        int dot = path.lastIndexOf('.');
        if (dot == -1)
            throw new IOException("No . in " + path);
        return path.substring(1+dot);
}It is also possible for there to be thumbnail images stored in an image file. (These thumbnails
don't even have to be related to the main image.) ImageIO has methods to read these directly,
so if you have control over your image files you can create them with thumbnails in place.

Linksys E4200V2 - VERY Slow Performance-WIRED, WIRELESS, INTERNET SPEED

Hi everyone... I just want to start by saying that I am a very unsatisfied customer!
I purchased the Linksys E4200 V2 on 02.06.2012 since this is the latest high end router from Linksys which according to the specs and the reviews this router is supposed to be super mega fast...the box should probably say SUPER MEGA SLOW.
I called support and after spending two hours on the phone they said that the case will be escalated and that someone will contact me within 48 hrs - It has now been more than 72 hrs and no phone calls or emails have come my way - the router is still not performing.
The following is my setup:
HP Quad Core Desktop with Windows 7 x64 bit with 8GB RAM
Network Card is an integrated 1GBPS card
I've upgraded all of my ethernet cables to Cat 6 (to see if this made and difference - which it did not)
LinkSys E4200 V2 router
Western Digital My Book Duo Live 6TB external drive with ethernet port of 1GBPS
This weekend I went as far as reinstalling a fresh copy of Windows 7 x64 on a Solid State Hard drive
My PC is connected to the E4200V2 via Cat 6 cable
The My Book Duo is connected to the E4200V2 via Cat 6 Cable
The E4200V2 is connected to my cable modem via Cat 6 Cable
ISSUES:
WIRED
I am getting no more than 20mbs when I copy a 85GB folder from my PC to my external My Book Duo. I expected to get either 1GBPS speed or at least 400MBs speed since all devices are connected via 1GBPS interfaces and the cables ar Cat 6. I am using both the native windows copy and paste and I am also using TeraCopy to copy files.
WIRELESS
The wireles speed is BAD as well - I am not getting no more than 50MBS with my laptop located just 20 inches from the router.
CABLE MODEM CONNECTION
When I run speed tests to the internet I am getting a very slow speed test of 1.5MBS and sometimes I get 20MBS with the E4200V2 router.
With my OLD Netgear router I get speed tests of 28MBS and never 1.5MBS.

AndrewGoldy wrote:
Hi there,
I've got a very similar problem.
I've got the Cisco Linksys E4200 (Firmware Version: 1.0.05 build 7 Aug 23, 2012).
With my previous router, I was able to copy files over the wired network at roughly 11MB/sec (about 100Mbps).
Now, with the new Linksys router plugged in, with the same cables and pcs, etc, I can only get an average copy rate of 4.4MB/sec - under HALF the speed that I was previously getting - and often sustained slow speeds of roughly 1.8MB/sec
Any ideas???
Otherwise I'm returning this router for something else!!!
I can see that you already have the latest firmware. It might be that the firmware is corrupted. What I can suggest is to reflash the firmware, reset and reconfigure the router. You might as well try to disable WMM.

How to create text box with multiple lines in selection screen.

Hi,
i need to create a text box to capture comment with 300 characters. i want to achive this without using module pool,is there any posibilities to that
regards
raja

Since text on Report screens is limited basically to what's left on a line in the selection screen, you'll have to use Module Pool.
however, you can call a screen from a report program and use the editor within a Custom Control on the screen. Not a tough thing to do.

Creating text boxes is causing VERY slow performance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for