Creating TR automatically - mutliple TRs for the same St.Bin.

Hi Experts,
Please let me know if this is possible?
I'm able to create auto TR without any problem for my WM-PP interface for the pick parts.
I've one issue on this.  Please help me if you can on this.
My requirement is to create one TR for the same storage type, same storage bin irrespective of the planning goods movement date.  Can I create one TR? Is this possible in Standard SAP? 
If yes, how can I do this?  What configurations are necessary?   We're using  ECC6.0.
If not  possible, can I create one TO for the same storage type, same storage bin? 
In my environment, it's creating multiple TRs.  That's an issue for me.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Please help me if you could.  Be honest and don't answer if you aren't sure.
Appreciate your help and time.
Thank you so much.
with regards,
Muthu Ganapathy.

Hi MdZ,
I tried LT0s,  it did not work in my scenario.  I tried with LT0A where you have to enter material number, movement type, planning date etc.  If I give all these combinations,  My scenario will not work.  I can have combination of these in multiple.  For which I want to create one TO.  I was able to create a group successfully.  In my scenario, the movement type is 319, the requirement type is P.  I need to be able to create one TO for the group that I've created based on these criteria.  I tried and did not work the LT0 transactions.  If you have recommendation, please let me know, appreciate your help.
Thank you.
with regards,
Muthu Ganapathy.

Similar Messages

  • Sourcing: Creating more than one PO for the same BID

    Hello,
    We are using the sourcing functionality in SRM 5.0 (classic escenario).
    On the basis of an acepted bid, we generate a Purchase Order in the R/3 Backend system.
    We noticed that in the standard, SRM lets us create for the same position of the bid, another Backend PO, without warning or error.
    We would like to manipulate this escenario in such a way that this PO repitition of the same Bid position is not possible.
    Anyone already found a way around this problem? May be we need to activate an error message?
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    I agree that
    SRM lets us create for the same position of the bid, another Backend PO
    but it does give warning that I have seen.
    would recommed to work with yr ABAP team to see whether you can convert this message to type "Error".
    one more suggestion is for ..... PO_NEW badi
    hope you would have implementation of this exit.
    then you can check whether for current BO BUS2200 whether ECC PO is already created
    if yes
    then do not create again
    BR
    Dinesh

  • Sales Deal with two different validation dates for the same material

    Hi SAPers,
    I am trying to create a u201CSales Dealu201D VB31, for the same material/condition, but with two different validation dates. After the creation of the first record, I select u201CNew conditionu201D button, but the system give me the message VK104, u201Cthe condition is being processed in the current session.u201D.
    How can I solve this issue?
    Thanks in advance.
    Pedro

    We can't have multiple records for the same condition and key values valid on the same date. The condition end date is part of the primary key in the database table. The date ranges between the records cannot overlap. When you create a new record, usually the end date is set to 12/31/9999 by default. If you need to have this deal to end on a different date and a new deal to start afterwards, then first you need to change 12/31/9999 to a different date.
    Also usually I try to exit the screen between the transactions.

  • Can we create two POs for the same 3rd party Sales Order?

    Hi MM experts,
    Issue: Can we create two POs for the same 3rd party Sales Order
    In Third party purchase process, first sales order created with a spl. item category  and it creates the PR automatically with the Sales order material and Qty and this PR converted PO.
    They got a pur.req. for sale order on same item for same delevery date. They did not get any warning msg. saying that a PO was prviously placed against this sale order.
    How it is possible that we were able to place another PO? concern is that second PO was palced against SO which was already used & completed. they were able to place 2 POs for the same customer same delevery date. How it is possible?
    If anyone face the same issue, please let me know if you have any answer to this questions.
    Thanks in advance.
    Suresh.

    Suresh,
    It is hard for me to give you a definitive answer since you have created a customized solution.
    How it is possible that we were able to place another PO? concern is that second PO was palced against SO which was already used & completed. they were able to place 2 POs for the same customer same delevery date. How it is possible?
    Normally, the system will not do this.  A third party PR or PO will be 'account assigned' to the Sales order.  SAP standard 3rd party will not create additional purchase reqs unless there has been manual intervention.  Try searching for changes in the Sales order and changes in the original purchase order.  They may give you a clue.
    I believe the normal Item category for third party SO is TAS (I am working from memory here, I am not in front of a system).  I don't know what ZTAG does.  I confess I am not an SD expert.  You might also want to post your question in an SD forum.
    You mention two custom applications, ZMMPLAN and ZSTPMP.  These somehow have functionality that is used to help you convert your PRs to POs.  If I were in your position, I believe I would also look at these applications for clues to how they might be contributing to your problem.  And please don't send me details about these apps.  I will not comment on custom code in this forum.
    Sorry I can't be of more help.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Email if Notification is created for the same material number

    Hi,
      IS it possible to get a email Automatically when a notification is created for the same material in last ___days/weeks.
    Thanks
    SM

    Yes.  Use the early warning system to send an eamil when ever the number of notifications exceeds a certain number in a given period time for a given group of objects.
    You must have the info structures for QM in LIS activated for this to work.
    Craig

  • WebTools Creating multiple users for the same User

    I had to make a few changes to a BP in SAP which will synch back into WebTools but now I am getting multiple users for the same contact. For example my user is cspehar_1 now in Webtools there are cspehar_1, cspehar_2, cspehar_3 and so on up to _8.
    This is occuring for several users in webtools.
    What causes this and how do I fix it?
    Thanks,
    Craig Spehar

    Hi Craig,
    There are two ways to cause this that I am aware of:
    1.  Change the "Business Partner Synch Contacts Field" setting after the initial synch.
    2.  Change the Web UserID on the BP contact in B1 (OCPR.U_PRX_SID).
    After that, update the user in WT  and synch. (might also happen if  you update the BP in B1)
    Since the synch is using the OCPR.U_PRX_SID to identify the contact, it will not be able to find it in B1 if the U_PRX_SID has changed.  When it does not find it, it assumes it needs to be created.  This results in a duplicate.
    The solution is to reset the U_PRX_SID back to what it was or set the synch contact field back to what it was.
    Then delete the last created duplicate contact from B1.
    There may be further data corruption issues here.  If orders/quotes/opportunities or other dependant data has synchronized referencing the duplicate user, these data will need to be correct as well.
    FYI, whatever caused this was probably at the root of your order problem as well.

  • Can i create additional apple id's using the same email address for using multiple products with iCloud?

    can i create additional apple id's using the same email address for using multiple products with iCloud?

    Hi Anne,
    I'm pretty sure different eMail addies are needed for different Apple IDs.

  • How to create multi garnishment order for the same garnishment document

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me how to create multi garnishment order for the same garnishment document. I tried to copy the entry in IT0195 but the sequence field is grayed out so it will just delete the old record. What configuration should I do to make this possible?
    Thanks a lot in advance.

    hi,
    As far as I got it.
    You cannot have multiple Garnishment order but if a need arises you have to maintain it in IT216.
    For that follow this path goto PA30->pernr->194->change->Garnishment->adjustment.
    Since like order you cannot maintain adjustment also directly.
    Regards,
    Amit
    Reward all helpful replies.

  • Blocking Vendor to create PO if any PO is exist for the same vendor

    Dear All,
    My scenario is , I want to restrict user to create PO for any vendor if for the same vendor PO is already available or not yet closed . System should allow user to create PO if previous PO are closed.
    How to solve this issue.
    Any user exit or BADI for this.
    Regards,
    Sanket

    Hello,
    Did you check the following Enhancement : MM06E004 in SMOD
    As input the FM EXIT_SAPMM06E_004 uses the PO header and vendor data.
    Based on this you can check if there is already a PO created for that vendor.
    Wim

  • Can we create two dashboard prompts for the same column in the samepage

    hi ,
    can we create two dashboard prompts for the same column on the same page,
    I have a date column and I am trying to create 2 dashboard prompts on the same page one as from date and the other one as to date.Is this possible to create.When I am trying to create it is giving me error like cannot use same column for creating the prompt
    Any suggestions or ideas

    863997 wrote:
    hi ,
    can we create two dashboard prompts for the same column on the same page,
    I have a date column and I am trying to create 2 dashboard prompts on the same page one as from date and the other one as to date.Is this possible to create.When I am trying to create it is giving me error like cannot use same column for creating the prompt
    Any suggestions or ideasYou are correct. You cannot build two prompts on the same column. Use this link for instructions on how to build a "between prompt" because of this fact:
    http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/oracle-bi-ee-101332-between-prompts-for-date-columns-using-presentation-variables/

  • I want to create a mail merge for address labels into a table, but when I fill a table with merge fields, it ends up creating multiple entries for the same address, rather than one table full of each address.

    ...but when I fill a table with merge fields, it ends up creating multiple entries for the same address, rather than one table full of each address. Please help.
    Thanks!

    That is a quirk of Pagesthat  it applies only one record per page.
    There is a way around this:
    http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewtopic.php?t=245&highlight=labels &mforum=iworktipsntrick
    Peter

  • I have only 1 ipad device, can I create 2 icloud accounts for the same ipad?

    I have only 1 ipad device, can I create 2 icloud accounts for the same ipad?

    Of course.
    To create the first iCloud account, open Settings > iCloud, type your Apple ID and follow the steps to set up iCloud.
    Then, to add a second iCloud account, open Settings > Mail, Contacts & Calendars > Add Account > iCloud, type the second Apple ID and set up iCloud for this Apple ID.
    Note that one iCloud account will work as the primary account and the other one as the secondary account. See > http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4020

  • Oracle Coherence*Web and BlazeDS: Multiple FlexSessions created for the same HttpSession

    Hi all,
    I have searched this forum and found a lot of good information from Alex Glosband and others about the infamous "Detected duplicate HTTP - based FlexSessions, generally due to the remote host disabling session cookies. Session coolkies must be enable to manage the client connection correctly." message.
    It seems, however, none of the cases are identical to ours. This is ours:
    - Resin 3.1.9
    - Oracle Coherence 3.7.1 with Coherence*Web (session replication)
    With this setup we get the "Detected duplicate HTTP..." message on the first attempt to use BlazeDS and on every subsequent call.  The same client and server code works fine in a local sessions setup.  With Coherence 3.3 (currently our production environment) it seems to occur less frequently, but still as frequent as it is a major issue for us.  It fails even with a single node using in-process distributed caching in our test setup (as well as with multi node out of process caching in our staging environment, for Coherence knowledgeable the resin app server runs with tangosol.coherence.session.localstorage=true in the first case and false in the second).
    Both the listener and message broker are mapped as "Coherence aware" in web.xml[1] so that they should use clustered sessions.
    We have been digging a bit and we found out that if we commented out lines 427 and 434 of flex.messaging.endpoints.BaseHTTPEndpoint from version 4.0.0.14931 it seems to mask the bug.  We added some logging in the setupFlexClient method and it seems that we get more or less a new FlexSession for each and every call - but they have the same cookie and thus underlying HttpSession. I.e. the list returned from flexClient.getFlexSessions() keeps growing. Thus we are not so keen on going to production with that memory leak and the above mentioned ugly hack of commenting out the detection of duplicates.
    We use request scope for the remote object, but could in theory use any scope as we do not really have any state on the object itself, it is all HttpSession state and return values that are key (logon is performed prior to doing the first blaze call, in pure forms and ajax, and it is not a timing issue in that regard we are seeing).
    Hope someone can shed some light on what can be happening. Is there any "reference testing"[2] or something when the FlexSessions are created that makes them being created as new? Where are they created?  We do not know the inner workings of the BlazeDS source, we just watched the call trace of the unwanted invalidation and found that to be line 427 of flex.messaging.endpoints.BaseHTTPEndpoint.
    Can we disable FlexSessions?  Since the flex and plain html parts of the app share the sessions, we always use FlexContext.getHttpRequest().getSession() anyway, never storing any state directly in the FlexSession or on the remote object. Or maybe there is a config option to help us with this detection (or creation) of multiple FlexSessions?
    Cheers and TIA,
    -S-
    [1] - For instance, this i the message broker servlet def:
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>MessageBrokerServlet</servlet-name>
      <display-name>MessageBrokerServlet</display-name>
    <servlet-class>com.tangosol.coherence.servlet.api22.ServletWrapper</servlet-class>       
    <init-param>
    <param-name>coherence-servlet-class</param-name>
    <param-value>flex.messaging.MessageBrokerServlet</param-value>
    </init-param>       
    <init-param>
    <param-name>services.configuration.file</param-name>
    <param-value>/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.xml</param-value>
    </init-param>
    <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    [2] - As you undertstand this is speculation based on pure air, but it could be that in Coherence there was a serialization/deserialization happening somehow that would break such a test?

    Just a quick update, it seems things are running in a stable fashion (and without visible memory leaks, just keeping the latest FlexSession) with these changes in BaseHTTPEndpoint:
         * Overrides to guard against duplicate HTTP-based sessions for the same FlexClient which will occur if the remote host has disabled session
         * cookies.
         * @see AbstractEndpoint#setupFlexClient(String)
        @Override
        public FlexClient setupFlexClient(String id) {
            log.debug("setupFlexClient start id " + id);
            FlexClient flexClient = super.setupFlexClient(id);
            // Scan for duplicate HTTP-sessions and if found, invalidate them and throw a MessageException.
            // A request attribute is used to deal with batched AMF messages that arrive in a single request by trigger multiple passes through this
            // method.
            boolean duplicateSessionDetected = (FlexContext.getHttpRequest().getAttribute(REQUEST_ATTR_DUPLICATE_SESSION_FLAG) != null);
            if (!duplicateSessionDetected) {
                List<FlexSession> sessions = flexClient.getFlexSessions();
                log.debug("Client has " + sessions.size() + " sessions.");
                int n = sessions.size();
                if (n > 1) {
                    int count = 0;
                    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
                        if (sessions.get(i) instanceof HttpFlexSession)
                            count++;
                        if (count > 1) {
                            FlexContext.getHttpRequest().setAttribute(REQUEST_ATTR_DUPLICATE_SESSION_FLAG, Boolean.TRUE);
                            duplicateSessionDetected = true;
                            break;
            // If more than one was found, remote host isn't using session cookies. Kill all duplicate sessions and return an error.
            // Simplest to just re-scan the list given that it will be very short, but use an iterator for concurrent modification.
            int i = 0;
            if (duplicateSessionDetected) {
                List<FlexSession> sessions = flexClient.getFlexSessions();
                log.debug("Detected sessions from client: " + sessions);
                for (FlexSession session : sessions) {
                    if (session instanceof HttpFlexSession && i < sessions.size()) {
    //                    log.debug("----> sessionId: " + session.getId());
    //                    Enumeration e1 = session.getAttributeNames();
    //                    while (e1.hasMoreElements()) {
    //                        Object key = e1.nextElement();
    //                        log.debug("--------->" + key + "--------->" + session.getAttribute((String) key));
    //                    session.invalidate();
                        flexClient.sessionDestroyed(session);
                    i++;
                // Return an error to the client.
    //            DuplicateSessionException e = new DuplicateSessionException();
    //            e.setMessage(ERR_MSG_DUPLICATE_SESSIONS_DETECTED);
    //            throw e;
            return flexClient;
    It is not exactly beautiful (to say the least), but if it does the trick I might just be pragmatic enough to go with it... NB: I am of course not proposing this as a patch to this file or anything, it is just an ugly hack for our specific case, but maybe the information can help the BlazeDS team find the root cause making it incompatible with Coherence*Web.
    Will give it a test run on our staging servers.

  • HT201320 Both of my kids have an iPod Touch.  Can I have two iPods registered on the same email account or do I have to create a new email account for the second one?

    Both of my kids have an iPod Touch.  Can I have two iPods registered on the same email account or do I have to create a new email account for the second one?

    There is some info in this discussion.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/6024120?tstart=0

  • Can create twice billing document for the same delivery in STO

    Hi experts,
    I donot have problems in Standard Sales order when I create billing doc via VF01. When I try to create another billing doc in VF01 for the same delivery it says error, as the item is already invoiced.
    This is correct. 
    But while creating invoice for STO order, system allows me to create more than 1 billing document for the same delivery. If we accidentally or purposefully create it allows to create many.
    Could you let me know where in SPRO (IMG) I can control this?
    Thanks,
    Pri

    Hi
    STO billing if it is intercompany STO followed by IV billing type you can create only once
    No special settings reqd to achieve this as you bill  (IV billing type) the delivery the first time, the delivery status gets completed
    If Intracompany, the billing type is proforma invoice F8  and this can be created as many times as you wish as proforma doesnot update accounting
    if your issue is this
    Even this also if you want to restrict only once then try with copying requirenments 311 at item level (i hope standard item category NLN is used) in VTFL between header NL to F8
    Regards
    Raja

Maybe you are looking for