Creation of BOM for given scenario

Hi All
I have a requirement of creating BOM under the given scenario:
I am currently into some food industy implementation wherein a certain raw food product is bought from farmers, It is then segregated as per the grade through a grading machine, the grade is again based on the size of the raw material, the challenge which am facing is if suppose the input to the machine is 100kg then after grading process how much of the input would be coming as Grade-A, Grade-B & Grade-C is not confirmed, it can be any combination of these three or it can be combination of these three & the wastage as well.
I shall look forward to your valuable inputs for mapping of the BOM in the given scenario.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Hi JK,
I had worked on a similar scenario, but there is one thing which is not clear and needs to be decided by you with the business is fixing of the quantity of any one grade i.e A,B or C the theoritical quantity and approximate scrap that you can expect. Once this decision is made then depending on the costing point of view you shall decided whether you need to go the co product way or the byproduct way along with the apportionment structure decision.
For our purpose say we have decided that normally B grade product comes out in more quantity when processing the input product "X". Then we can create a BOM with the header material as "B" and the components shall contain "X" in positive quanity and the other grades "A" ,"C", and scrap in negative quantities. So the BOM will look like this
say for example the B grade you shall get 60 kgs out of every 100 kgs of X. then the bom will look as follows
B(60)= 1.component X=100 kgs ,2. component A=(-20 kgs) 3. component B= (-20 kgs)
By using the above structure once a process order is created for B then the input product gets consumed (261 movement takes place) and paralley the 531 movemnt takes place for component A and B since they are in negative quantities and parallely B gets 101 GR to take place.
But its the business to decide the approximate composition for the BOM depending on the type of raw material they get. The business normally knows if the raw material comes from this farmer what kind of grade can be expected.
Hope this solution solves your issue.
Best Regards
Sasibhushan

Similar Messages

Creation of BOM with Items whose qty is not fixed derived from a formula.

Bom need to be created for a finished product whose Item quantities are ot fixed. The scenario is explained below.
Raw milk(cow and buffalo) is a Raw Material recd from Vendors in litres.It is converted to
kg as 1L = 1.027Kg.Finished Header material is Toned milk with Fat 3%
and SNF 8.5%.UOM for FG is in Litre only.
Fat and SNF(Protien)% is measured at incoming stage and recorded and Fat
content will vary from 3 to 6.5% and SNF content will vary from 7 to 9%.
Based on the measured Fat and SNF% value the required Fat and SNF% is
calculated for the Finished Header Material.For each measured value
target Fat% and SNF% will vary.
Then again after calculating the requuired Fat and SNF%,If excess Fat
and SNF found in the raw milk they are extracted. If Fat and SNF
contents are less than the target value additional Fat/SNF will be
added.For extraction and addition they follow certain percentage.
Can pls let us know how to create a BOM for such scenario. I am at Customer
place for implementation.I have given the calculation method below.
Formula used:
1)Available (Fat or SNF) % in 1027Kg = Available (Fat or SNF) % per Kg * Input Milk Qty in Kg(1027)
2)Required (Fat or SNF) % in 1027Kg = Target (Fat or SNF) % per Kg * Input Milk Qty in Kg(1027)
3)Excess/Less (Fat or SNF)% in 1027Kg = Available (Fat or SNF)% in 1027 Kg - Req (Fat or SNF) % for 1027Kg
4)Addition Fat to be added or Extracted = Excess or Less Fat % in 1027Kg * 72%
5)Additional SNF to be added or Extracted = Excess or Less SNF% in 1027 * 95%
Note: 1) In The above formula Available Fat% per Kg of Raw milk may vary from 3 to 6.5%
Note: 2) In The above tformula Available SNF% per Kg of Raw milk may vary from 7 to 9%.

Hi
U need to use master recipes for this kind of scenario(PP-PI)
First Create char like SNF , FAT ect what ever u want to use in formulas
Then assign these char to Batch class (023) and assign to your ROH , HALB, FERT in Classification view
Create BOM for u r FERT and later Master recipe
In Master recipe u can use material calculations using in put char values like % FAT ect
Then u r BOM Comp qty will change automatically as per the % FAT in Raw milk
In this way u can map the req in SAP. I hope this info will be useful
Regards
Brahmaji

PO creation where discount is given after taxes for few Vendors

Hi pankaj,
Need a pricing stucture in PO creation where discount is given after taxes for few Vendors.
please give the solution with brief steps.
Regards,
Pandi

Hi,
Take a copy of RA01 in M/06 as YA01(as Discount) and keep it as following;
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category Blank
And Plus/minus - A (Positive)
Use this in Pricing Procedure ( M/08 ) after Gross Price ad Discount conditions (before Subtotal) and assign Subtotal "6" against this condition type.
In OBQ3 - Tax Procedure, assign AltCBV 363 to CST/VAT Condition Type (JIP1/JIP5)
Now check the calculation will happen as following;
Gross Price = 10000 INR
Discount (as -ve/+ve) = 1000 INR
BED 14% = 1400 INR
ECS 2% = 28 INR
SECess 1% = 14 INR
CST 2% = 248.84 INR
Also refer following thread for the same;
[Calculation Procedure;

Automatic creation of requirement for extra consumption in COGI

Dear.
For a production order with a component totally consumed during the backflushing of CO11N I run a new confirmation. The component isnu2019t available , the confirmation is done and the system create for the component an error movement in COGI.
If I see MD04 for this component I donu2019t see any production order requirement for the extra consumption quantity in COGI.
But the planner need to know the quantity that remain to withdrawn.
Which is the reason for the missing automatic creation of requirement for extra consumption in COGI ?
Thanks.

Dear Cris,
Have you manually edited and input extra qty in CO11N
When backflush is activated and Full qty is confirmed
Then if you perform confirmation second time then form where system will again pick the component
Once again check in production order BOM over view and also in BOM what is the qty given
Can you eloborate more in detail what you have performed ( steps required )
Dear Siva,
Just correct me if i am wrong
Regards
Madhu
Edited by: K.Madhu Kumar on Sep 30, 2010 1:10 PM

Automatic TO creation and confirmation for a Material document

Hi Dear All,
i am new to MM andWM.
I have to customization for auto transfer orders and confirmations for material documents what ever created with 101 movement type in Inventory Management. I have down configuration like below.
SPRO->Logistics Execution->Warehouse Management->Activities->Transfers-> Set Up Autom. TO Creation for TRs / Posting Change Notices
Double click on control data tab
Hear for my warehouse I given input like   Auto TO = 1,
                                                                         AddId = select check box.
And in Assign control tab for 101 movement type I have given input like below.
Automatic TO = 1.
TO item can be confirmed immed. = tick checkbox
Propose Confirmation = tick checkbox.
Foreground/Backgrnd = D.
After creating of Material document I am executing report RLAUTA10 in SE38.When I execute this report system showing message like TO processing finished: TR total:   17, TO created:    0, Errors:   17.
If I check header details of transfer requirements in LB03, i am not seeing Tick Mark in Auto TO Creation field.
Can any one tell me what the mistake i have down or if i need to do any further configuration. Please help me regarding this concern?
Thanks in Advance..

Dear Steve,
Thanks a lot for giving reply with what I need to do, but I am unable to see result.
I have down configuration like below even though system not processing Auto TO creation. Can you explain me if I have down any mistake below.
Click on Assign button,
Press on New entries
WhN = 900
Reference Movement Type = 101
Movement indicator = B
Movement type for Whse Mgmt = 101
TR create Transfer Requirement = X
Immed.TO Creation
Mail confirmation for background processing = 01.
GR date = 2

LIBOVD ERROR - "validateContextToken: workflow session was not found for given context. Create a new workflow session with token"

Hello everyone,
I have the following scenario:
We're using "Oracle SOA Suite 11g 11.1.1.7.0" (Patched w/ 17893896) mainly for a BPM/Human workflow composite. Former, we were having the error bellow:
<Mar 16, 2015 1:13:03 PM BRT> <Error> <oracle.soa.services.workflow.query> <BEA-000000> <<.> Verification Service cannot resolve user identity. User weblogic cannot be found in the identity repository. Workflow Context token cannot be null in request.
ORABPEL-30511
When that error ocurred, no one was able to use the system (BPM/Human Workflow).
I opened an SR, and after some analysis from the support, it recommended me to set up "virtualize=true" in EM, and restarting the domain. Then it started logging the following:
connection to ldap://[10.200.10.57]:7001 as cn=Admin.
javax.naming.NamingException: No LDAP connection available to process request for DN: cn=Admin.
Looking up on support KB, I found this note Doc ID 1545680.1 and increased from Max size of Connection Pool 10 to 200. That did work successfully! Problem now is that the <SERVER>_diagnostic.log is being filled up with the following error:
[2015-03-31T16:03:46.421-03:00] [soa_server2] [ERROR] [] [oracle.soa.services.workflow.verification] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: e0194e38aa6c9a2f:39fc1ff9:14c5def5247:-8000-00000000000a5653,0] [APP: soa-infra] <.> validateContextToken: workflow session was not found for given context. Create a new workflow session with token=51490173-e3d0-41dd-ae99-983915aa8454;;G;;Z+P7Oe9ABnoTUQD9ECryEW2l0/8yRcqPDyZsOWBCuzMmRgA3Qsj601TxmWQ87z2MjuwW5AH+KzgjIwkPmhJFdpc1FrE6Y/MrN1bxIDHJWu2/zP3iSNwKD07hRrh/U37Ea0TvaQyuaHJIog9y3Ptmzw==
One important point is that we're using only the embedded WLS ldap. So I am not 100% sure if we should be using the virtualize flag=true, once all docs I read point out that this should be done when using multi-ldap providers.
Also, I only got this error in the "diagnostic.log".
Although, no user has complained about using the system, I really want to work it out. Anyone has any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!

I have moved your thread from Certification to SOA Suite to get proper assistance.
Thanks,
Lisa

SAP PI conceptual best practice for synchronous scenarios

Hi,
 Apologies for the length of this post but I'm sure this is an area most of you have thought about in your journey with SAP PI.
 We have recently upgraded our SAP PI system from 7.0 to 7.1 and I'd like to document best practice guidelines for our internal development team to follow.
I'd be grateful for any feedback related to my thoughts below which may help to consolidate my knowledge to date.
 Prior to the upgrade we have implemented a number of synchronous and asynchronous scenarios using SAP PI as the hub at runtime using the Integration Directory configuration.
No interfaces to date are exposes directly from our backend systems using transaction SOAMANAGER.
 Our asynchronous scenarios operate through the SAP PI hub at runtime which builds in resilience and harnesses the benefits of the queue-based approach.
 My queries relate to the implementation of synchronous scenarios where there is no mapping or routing requirement. Perhaps it's best that I outline my experience/thoughts on the 3 options and summarise my queries/concerns that people may be able to advise upon afterwards.
 1) Use SAP PI Integration Directory. I appreciate going through SAP PI at runtime is not necessary and adds latency to the process but the monitoring capability in transaction SXMB_MONI provide full access for audit purposes and we have implemented alerting running hourly so all process errors are raised and we handle accordingly. In our SAP PI Production system we have a full record of sync messages recorded while these don't show in the backend system as we don't have propogation turned on. When we first looked at this, the reduction in speed seemed to be outweighed by the quality of the monitoring/alerting given none of the processes are particularly intensive and don't require instant responses. We have some inbound interfaces called by two sender systems so we have the overhead of maintaing the Integration Repository/Directory design/configuration twice for these systems but the nice thing is SXMB_MONI shows which system sent the message. Extra work but seemingly for improved visibility of the process. I'm not suggesting this is the correct long term approach but states where we are currently.
 2) Use the Advanced Adapter Engine. I've heard mixed reviews about this functionaslity, there areh obvious improvements in speed by avoiding the ABAP stack on the SAP PI server at runtime, but some people have complained about the lack of SXMB_MONI support. I don't know if this is still the case as we're at SAP PI 7.1 EHP1 but I plan to test and evaluate once Basis have set up the pre-requisite RFC etc.
 3) Use the backend system's SOAP runtime and SOAMANAGER. Using this option I can still model inbound interfaces in SAP PI but expose these using transaction SOAMANAGER in the backend ABAP system. [I would have tested out the direct P2P connection option but our backend systems are still at Netweaver 7.0 and this option is not supported until 7.1 so that's out for now.] The clear benefits of exposing the service directly from the backend system is obviously performance which in some of our planned processes would be desirable. My understanding is that the logging/tracing options in SOAMANAGER have to be switched on while you investigate so there is no automatic recording of interface detail for retrospective review.
 Queries:
 I have the feeling that there is no clear cut answer to which of the options you select from above but the decision should be based upon the requirements.
 I'm curious to understand SAPs intention with these options -
 - For synchronous scenarios is it assumed that the client should always handle errors therefore the lack of monitoring should be less of a concern and option 3 desirable when no mapping/routing is required?
 - Not only does option 3 offer the best performance, but the generated WSDL is ready once built for any further system to implement thereby offering the maximum benefit of SOA, therefore should we always use option 3 whenever possible?
 - Is it intended that the AAE runtime should be used when available but only for asynchronous scenarios or those requiring SAP PI functionality like mapping/routing otherwise customers should use option 3? I accept there are some areas of functionality not yet supported with the AAE so that would be another factor.
 Thanks for any advice, it is much appreciated.
 Alan
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:48 AM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:50 AM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 20, 2010 12:11 PM

Hi Aaron,
I was hoping for a better more concrete answer to my questions.
I've had discussion with a number of experienced SAP developers and read many articles.
There is no definitive paper that sets out the best approach here but I have gleaned the following key points:
- Make interfaces asynchronous whenever possible to reduce system dependencies and improve the user experience (e.g. by eliminating wait times when they are not essential, such as by sending them an email with confirmation details rather than waiting for the server to respond)
- It is the responsibility of the client to handle errors in synchronous scenarios hence monitoring lost through P-P services compared to the details information in transaction SXMB_MONI for PI services is not such a big issue. You can always turn on monitoring in SOAMANAGER to trace errors if need be.
- Choice of integration technique varies considerably by release level (for PI and Netweaver) so system landscape will be a significant factor. For example, we have some systems on Netweaver 7.0 and other on 7.1. As you need 7.1 for direction connection PI services we'd rather wait until all systems are at the higher level than have mixed usage in our landscape - it is already complex enough.
- We've not tried the AAE option in a Production scenarios yet but this is only really important for high volume interfaces, something that is not a concern at the moment. Obviously cumulative performance may be an issue in time so we plan to start looking at AAE soon.
Hope these comments may be useful.
Alan

How to create group bom for multiple plants with different company codes

Dear all,
In my current scenario we have 5 Company codes with a plant with each company. The same kind of materials exist in all the 5 plants, so what i want is when i create any BOM, that BOM has to extend in all the company codes, as with GROUP BOM i can able to extend the same in only one company code.
So how to do this?
Thanks in Advance
Bhushan

For that first extend all the materials to all the plants... In one plant create a BOM for the material..
In all other polants in CS01, click COpy from .. There you mention the matreial and the plant in which the BOm is alerady available..
karthick

Use of Alternate Components in BOM for Production

Hi Experts,
We implement for a customer who are manufacturers of Electronic Products.
There are possibilities of producing a Finished Products with an Alternate Child Parts some times.
Is it possible to automate this.
More examplified below.
XYZ is a Finished Product whose Components are A, B, C.
To produce the same XYZ, the components used may be
A1, B, C or
A, B, C1 or
A1, B, C1. So there are binary concept number of combinations.
Since the components are more in number & there are chain alternates (i.e. if one changes other has to be changed), it is not practically possible to maintain many number of BOMs for a single Finished Product.
Is there any way implement this scenario upfront.
Advance Thanks & Regards
Aru

Hello Friend,
SAP does not have such type of functionality we can make one bill of material for one finished Item.
Manually:-
You may try like make big bill of material ,which have all alternative materials ,raw material in single BOM.
and whenever you make production order delete that materials which you are not going to use that production.
Import from excel file:-
If we want to make combination then goto excel and import it by Data transfer workbench(DTW)
i am working in same industry , i m using same in excel make all combination and varified it engg. then import in Bill of materials as well production order.
for import i have made .bat file AND end user put the excel file in predefined location and click on .bat file it execute and all data import in SAP with using manually DTW.
Thanks
Manvendra Singh Niranjan

Required Help and Documentations for following Scenarios. URGENT

Hi every one,
I require help and materials for following scenarios:
1) RFC to IDOC
2) JDBC to RFC & IDOC
3) Mail to File
4) HTTP to RFC, JDBC & IDOC
5)WEB SERVICES to RFC & IDOC
6) IDOC to ABAP proxy
7) Java Proxy to JDBC
my email id: [email protected]
urgent plzz help me...
Message was edited by:
satish c

Satish,
I would suggest to go through sravyas weblogs where she has given all the links to all the scenarios:
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/12/25/aspirant-to-learn-sap-xiyou-won-the-jackpot-if-you-read-this-part-i
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/12/26/aspirant-to-learn-sap-xiyou-won-the-jackpot-if-you-read-this-part-ii
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2006/12/27/aspirant-to-learn-sap-xiyou-won-the-jackpot-if-you-read-this-part-iii
Also check this weblogs which they have explained with some scenarios:
Following are the links to weblogs which will help to develop the basic scenarios.
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters - IDoc to File
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/03/14/abap-proxies-in-xiclient-proxy - ABAP Proxy to File
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30 - File to JDBC
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/14/file-to-r3-via-abap-proxy - File to ABAP Proxy
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/02/introduction-to-simplefile-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart1 - File to File Part 1
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/03/introduction-to-simple-file-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart2 - File to File Part 2
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/06/24/convert-any-flat-file-to-any-idoc-java-mapping - Any flat file to any Idoc
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit - File to RFC
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1685 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - File to Mail
/people/jayakrishnan.nair/blog/2005/06/20/dynamic-file-name-using-xi-30-sp12-part--i - Dynamic File Name Part 1
/people/jayakrishnan.nair/blog/2005/06/28/dynamic-file-namexslt-mapping-with-java-enhancement-using-xi-30-sp12-part-ii - Dynamic File Name Part 2
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/07/mail-adapter-xi--how-to-implement-dynamic-mail-address - Dynamic Mail Address
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/25/understanding-message-flow-in-xi - Message Flow in XI
/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm - Walk through BPM
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/22/schedule-your-bpm - Schedule BPM
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/22/xi-maintain-rfc-destinations-centrally - Maintain RFC destination centrally
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/08/18/triggering-e-mails-to-shared-folders-of-sap-is-u - Triggering Email from folder
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/08/17/outbound-idocs--work-around-using-party - Handling different partners for IDoc
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/27/modeling-integration-scenario146s-in-xi - Modeling Integration Scenario in XI
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/25/xi-sending-a-message-without-the-use-of-an-adapter-not-possible - Testing of integration process
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/05/25/xi-how-to-add-authorizations-to-repository-objects - Authorization in XI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/58/d22940cbf2195de10000000a1550b0/content.htm - Authorization in XI
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/09/xi-alerts--step-by-step - Alert Configuration
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/09/xi-alerts--troubleshooting-guide - Trouble shoot alert config
/people/sameer.shadab/blog/2005/09/21/executing-unix-shell-script-using-operating-system-command-in-xi - Call UNIX Shell Script
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/02/overview-of-transition-from-dev-to-qa-in-xi - Transport in XI
/people/r.eijpe/blog/2005/11/04/using-abap-xslt-extensions-for-xi-mapping - Using ABAP XSLT Extensions for XI Mapping
/people/prasad.ulagappan2/blog/2005/06/07/mail-adapter-scenarios-150-sap-exchange-infrastructure - Mail Adaptor options
/people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/07/27/idocs-multiple-types-collection-in-bpm - Collection of IDoc to Single File
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/17/xi-controlling-access-to-sensitive-interfaces - Controlling access to Sensitive Interfaces
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/10/xi-the-same-filename-from-a-sender-to-a-receiver-file-adapter--sp14 - The same filename from a sender to a receiver file adapter - SP14
/people/prasad.illapani/blog/2005/11/14/payload-based-message-search-in-xi30-using-trex-engine - Payload Based Message Search in XI30 using Trex Engine /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/24/xi-configuring-ccms-monitoring-for-xi-part-i - XI : Configuring CCMS Monitoring for XI- Part I
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/23/xi-html-e-mails-from-the-receiver-mail-adapter - XI: HTML e-mails from the receiver mail adapter
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/11/22/xi-faqs-provided-by-sap-updated - XI : FAQ's Provided by SAP
Regards,
---Satish

Repetitive Component Scrap for MTS scenario using MFBF transaction

Hi,
We are trying to replicate the functionality of posting a backflush document to process Repetitive material component Scrap for MTS scenario with BOM explosion using MFBF transaction into a custom RF program.
We tried to use 'BAPI_REPMANCONF1_CREATE_MTS' to backflush the Scrap for the above scenario. But it did not help. And no other BAPI's exist. BDC'ing the transaction doesn't help as it contains Table Controls and lot of subscreens an dit is highly volatile for a RF screen.
In view of above restrictions, we are not able to find a solution of how to implement the above functionailty in a RF program.
Can someone please help us in this regard.
Thanks.

Any Body plz ? .. Even I need this.

BOM for the materials in plant

Hi,
What is the tcode to find the materials i have in plant is having BOM?
Rex

Dear,
1)Possibly, you can query the table" MAST" for the list of materials with SE16.
2)If you want to find details of individual materials:
Use transaction codes:
CS03 - Material BOM here you will get list of material having BOM by pressing F4.
3) I don't think there is any such transaction available. (But you can get the list of material who has a BOM from MM02 (F4 options). To get the required list you need to develop a small customized report. The logic may be like: Input plant code on input screen. Let system to check all the available materials in the MARC table for given plant. This list of materials(MATNR) to be supplied to MAST table and those materials which doesn't have corresponding STLNR (BOM No.) can be outputted as the desired list. I hope this will help in resolving the issue. Please revert back in case of any further clarification.
4)There is one unique way is there which helps you to find our fert / Halb code without BOM.
Go to MD21 and select low level code 999 and execute.
Hope it will help you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

BOM for sub-contarcting

Hi, a finish product requires 2 sub-assemblies and both the sub-assemblies can be manufactured in-house. ea sub assemblies needs a raw mat to prepare. some times we send only the bottom most level raw to vendor for sub-contracting and we receive sub-assembly 1. at the time of design we are not aware whether it is manufactured internally or externally.in above scenario how to set multi level bom and what will be mrp results (mts,0 stock)? thanks in advance.

Dear Yadav,
Here the question is only about the procurement type and special procurement type which comes when
creating the material master and not in BOM.
Only this procurement type is going to give the impact when running MRP and BOM has to be created
whether it may be a sub-contracted or inhouse manufactured.
You can create 2 different BOM's if the sub-assembly is going to have a separate BOM for inhouse and
separate one for a sub-contracted one.
So check with this and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Different BOM for each month

Hi,
The BOM is different for each month. If i make different alternatives for each month and run the LTP will it help to get the raw material requirement as per the BOM for that month. Example BOM for NOV/DEC will be not same but we want to estimate the raw material req for next year.
Kindly advise what i need to do?
Regards
ShankarR

Dear Shankar,
1.What is the business contraint in using change number functionality to address this requirement without creating any
additional alternative BOM?
2.Say you create the first alternative BOM using a change number and save all the BOM components.
3.The default valid from date will be the valid from date of the change number and valid to date will be 31.12.9999.
4.Whenever there is a BOM change use a different change number with valid from date say 25.10.2010,so using this in the
same BOM delete the components and add the new component's or make any BOM change and save.
5.For the deleted components the valid from date will be say (you have created using today's date for BOM creation)
05.10.2010 and the valid to date will be 25.10.2010.
6.What is the advantage of creating new alternative BOM?
6.How are you using the LTP results for inventory purpose,say how are you planning the raw material's requirement for the
next year based on this year's BOM?
7.LTP is not only the feasibility of material procurement,but also production that can be produced with available resource.
Check and revert
Regards
S Mangalraj

Could any body explain the step by step procedure of creation of BOM in DP?

Hi,
Could any body explain the step by step procedure of creation of BOM in DP?
Is there any document available to create the step by step procedure?
Please mail to this Id:[email protected]
Regards,
Chow.

Look at this source
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/62/944d40cef71059e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
The steps are very simple
(1) PreRequisite: There should be a SNP/PPDS PDS generated either from R3 BOM/Routing or APO IPPE object
(2) Use the transaction mentioned earlier- /SAPAPO/CURTO_GEN_DP - Generate DP Production Data Structure
Let us know If you are looking for the settings which are to be used in the transaction mentioned above
or
You need to know how to create the SNP/PPDS PDS or IPPE object
Regards
Kumar

Creation of BOM for given scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for