Creation of Hierarchy-Analyse summarization Object : Plan/Actual Comparisio

Dear All,
Pls tell me how to create the hierarchy for run the T.Code KKBC_HOE.
Thanks in advance
Regards
avudaiappan

Please use KKR0 to create hierarchy. There you can specify the data objects, summarization level and hierarchy levels.

Similar Messages

0CO_PC_01 Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data

Hi Experts
I have a question regarding Cost Object Controlling: Plan/Actual Data (0CO_PC_01). I know nothing about the R/3 processes and tcodes behind this datasource.
For a given material and a given plant do I only get records with VTYPE(Value type for Reporting) 10, but I do not understand why - I need VTYPE = 70.
I therefore hope:
1. That somebody could provides input on why I only get VTYPE = 10 and how I get 70 instead.
2. That somebody can tell me the tcodes behind this datasource on the R/3 side.
Thanks and kind regards,
Torben

Hi Mr. V.
Thanks a lot for the input.
The problem is that we have got VTYPE 30 (target) for some materials, but not for specific material A and we really do not understand why. Do you know how I can verify if the variance is present for the given material A in R/3?
Thanks and kind regards,
Torben
Edited by: Torben Pedersen on Apr 3, 2009 12:00 AM
Sorry, it is VTYPE 30 i need, not 70 as stated by mistake at first.

Progress Analysis, Plan/actual % comparision based on activity confirmation

hello guyz,
I have to monitor the project progress based on activtiy confirmation, can anyone guide how can i see progress of project based on percentage with plan/actual dates comparison.
The business scenario is:
One top level WBS under which 2 WBS assign, each 2nd level WBS have one network assigned. The second level WBSE represent individual site where i have to perform various internal activities without cost involvements, only dates and number of durations to be maintained in each internal activity with finish start relationship.
The structure is:
Root WBS (level 1)--SITE 1 WBS (level 2)--
SITE 2 WBS (level 2)
> (Network 001) -
> (Network 002)----
> 001 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days) -
> 002 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days)-
> 001 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days) -
> 002 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days)-
> 001 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days) -
> 002 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days)-
> 001 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days) -
> 002 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days)-
In the above project structure i have entered the start planed dates for each network / site. The system automatically calculate the planned end dates after scheduling.
In execution phase, i have also maintained actual dates on activity confirmation only.
Now i need assistance to see the project progress for each network site.
Regards
Saqib Usman

the problum is still there kindly provide assistance...
I have to monitor the project progress based on activtiy confirmation, can anyone guide how can i see progress of project based on percentage with plan/actual dates comparison.
The business scenario is:
One top level WBS under which 2 WBS assign, each 2nd level WBS have one network assigned. The second level WBSE represent individual site where i have to perform various internal activities without cost involvements, only dates and number of durations to be maintained in each internal activity with finish start relationship.
The structure is:
Root WBS (level 1)--SITE 1 WBS (level 2)--
SITE 2 WBS (level 2)
> (Network 001) -
> (Network 002)----
> 001 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days) -
> 002 0010 (1st Internal activity 2 days)-
> 001 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days) -
> 002 0010 (2nd Internal activity 4 days)-
> 001 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days) -
> 002 0010 (3rd Internal activity 1 days)-
> 001 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days) -
> 002 0010 (4th Internal activity 3 days)-
In the above project structure i have entered the start planed dates for each network / site. The system automatically calculate the planned end dates after scheduling.
In execution phase, i have also maintained actual dates on activity confirmation only.
Now i need assistance to see the project progress for each network site.
Regards
Saqib Usman

S_ALR_87013340-PRCtr Group:plan/Actual Caomparison Report performance issue

I'm trying to get the "actual line item" details from the S_ALR_87013340-PRCtr Group:plan/Actual Caomparison Report and I get a
ABAP run time error. I tried to running for just one month and on several accts. please help to me. how to get the report.
or how to improve the performance of this program.
Thanks in Advance

hi,
first we need to know what part of the code is taking time. Do run time analysis using SE30 transaction to know what part of coding is taking more time. use can ST12 transaction to get more detailed analysis.
Since this is standard SAP report also check any OSS note exist for the performance problem.

Hierarchy Analysis Authorization in BW and BOBJ Webi Report

Hello,
We have a scenario wherein we have implemented Analysis Authorizations (Hierarchy) on Organizational Unit info object (0ORGUNIT) and need to report on BOBJ WEBI. Our scenario is as following
ORGUNIT    - L0 (Overall Enterprise Level)
-     L1 (Enterprise - Continent Wise Split)
-     L2 (Enterprise u2013 Country Wise Split)
-     L3(Enterprise u2013 City Wise Split)
E.G-
      LO (Company ABC) MANAGER 0 will have access to the entire organization
           -L1 (ASIA) MANAGER1 will have access to ASIAN Subcontinent
                  -L2 (India) MANAGER 2 will have Access to country India
                            -L3 (New Delhi) MANAGER 2.1 will have access to city Delhi
                            -L3 (Mumbai) MANAGER 2.2 will have access to city Mumbai
                   -L2 (Malaysia) MANAGER 3 will have access to Country Malaysia
                              -L3 (Kuala Lampur)
                              -L3 (pahang)
             - L1 (Europe)
                                        u2026..
The requirement is that the CEO of the company should be able to see the entire set of data ( L0-L4).We have continent managers who can see that data specific to their continent, similarly at L3 Level the city manageru2019s should see the data only for their specific city.
In BI we have used analysis authorization based on hierarchies. We have created an authorization object say ZAUTH1 and have assigned the hierarchy L0 from RSECADMIN. Now, in Webi when we create a report a sample row comes as :
L0 Org Unit     L1 Org Unit     L2 Org Unit     L3 Org Unit     SALES Key Figure
Company ABC     Asia          India          Mumbai          1000
Now, we have MANAGER 2.2 who has only access to the data specific to his city (Mumbai). There is an Analysis Authorization object created for him ZAUTH2, by ONLY assigning the org unit hierarchy L3 (for Mumbai). When we run the bex report with the user MANAGER 2.2 u2013 it correctly displays the result and the user is only able to see the data for L3 Org Unit (Mumbai). However when you bring this data to Webi u2013 the report comes in the below format:
L0 Org Unit     L1 Org Unit     L2 Org Unit     L3 Org Unit     SALES Key Figure
Mumbai                                           1000
The L3 org unit has now got assigned to L0 Org unit , as this is the only org unit assigned to the MANAGER 2.2 user .
In such a case we are not able to write any generic formulae for the report. Is there a way to correct this issue? u2018Mumbaiu2019 should either get assigned to the L3 OrgUnit column is webi report , or is there a workaround that is possible ?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Vj

Hi Vijay,
The problem you speak of is known and comes from the fact that the hierachy is flattened in the process of delivering it to WebI. Therefore there is no real 'solution' to the problem, just some work-arounds you can think of...
1)
Create a report variable that starts looking at the lowest level, if it is empty check one up, and so on until you found what you were looking for (the lowest leaf available), which by definition must be there (even if it is top level).
Using similar logic you can also get a 'number of levels avaible' and so fill in the complete tree (duplicating the highest level).
This is difficult to explain when end users create their own reports, though you could provide a template report with these variables in there already.
2)
Extend the hierarchy with duplicates below the lowest level.
So i.e. L0 Company - L1 Continent - L2 Country - L3 City- L4 City - L5 City- L6 City.
This will give back on the four levels for top authorization
L0 Company - L1 Continent - L2 Country - L3 City
For authorization on Continent:
L0 Continent - L1 Country - L2 City- L3 City
For autorization City
L0 City- L1 City - L2 City- L3 City
So in all situations the fourth level, the L3 Object will hold the City level.
This you can then use in your report.
Hope this helps,
Marianne

Plan, Actual & Commitment Report in Multiple Currency

Dear SAP gurs,
Is there any report where I can see Plan, Actual & Commitments in Multiple currency (see below format). In standard SLAR reports, values are displayed in one currency at a time either I can see in INR or USD.
Here each WBS is planed in USD as well as in INR. If PO is raised in USD, then actual value should be shown against planning done in USD.
WBS Elem     Plan          Actual          Commitment
     USD     INR     USD     INR     USD     INR
WBS1.1     3000$     1000INR     500$               500INR
WBS2.2          50000INR          10000INR          300INR
Thanks,
Venkat

Dear Venkat
Each of the views in the hierarchy reports (such as 12KST1C) can
only contain values for one currency at a time (because totals for
multiple currencies would not make sense).
Since only one currency can be displayed at a time, the Trans.currency view is not meant to show values in multiple currencies; rather, the Trans.currency view only provides a reference to the user of the currency involved in the Plan and
Actual postings. For example, if the actual postings had been in
mixed currencies like:
Doc. date Cost elem.    Value COCurr CO.Cr      Value TranCurr TCrcy
   01-07-2007 911010000                 800   XXX                        1700 YYY
   01-07-2007 911010000              3,000   XXX                        3,000 XXX
Then the Trans.currency view would have contained:
Trans.currency         Plan             Actual
YYY                            0             800
XXX                         3,700           3,000
Result                     3,700           3,800
You can always switch between currencies in the report Settings ->
Currency, but only one will be displayed at once.
I hope this explanation helps you to understand the standard system
behaviour.
Regards
Martina

Planned / actual values in deliveries

Hi,
In MC(U: shipping point deliveries selection there is a option called Planned/actual in Edit drop down.
Pls clarify where we can enter the planning details for deliveries.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Abhee.

hi..
In CKMLQS actual cost of prod for qty stru display at multilevel is displayed.
In CKM3N Price analysis is being shown for opn, receipt (Prod & Others), Cons and Closing stock.
Cost shown under CKMLQS will match with CKMN3 when you display cost comp view of Production Row of Receipt.
Just goto Receipt row select it & click on left icon of costing cockpit it will bring the act prod cost comp structure
> select base qty user entry > change qty 1 you will find the act cost comp mached with ckmlqs.
kkumar

Cost Center Plan/Actual/Commitment

Hi
Want to Devlop a customized report for Cost Center where I need to display Plan/Actual/Commitments vaues for a cost center fiscal Year per period year wise.
Let me know which, tables I can use to get these values as COSS and COSP not shows values Period wise.
regards,
Atul Rajmane

Hi,
I am able to get required the data from COSS and COSP tabel.
While going through COSS-OBJNR number I am getting my required cost center have Object number as KLZPG1F010000105CR0021 where ZPG is my Controlling area and 1F010000105 is a cost center.
But, I unable to get it meaning of KL and CR0021 in this string.
Let me know what it means so that I can form my object as required above to get deatils from COSS table.
regards,
Atul Rajmane

BI Role with Analysis Auth Object

Hi
How can i use Authorisation Object created in RECADMIN with all the list of Infoproviders in S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1
So that user can perform mentioned action on the data providers mentioned in analysis authorization object.
As i need one place to list all the data targets user can access insted of maintaining in S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1 and in Analysis Authorization object
Thanks in advance

Thanks Everybody for giving suggestions; I really appreciate alll your efforts.
I followed step by step book of kamaljeet and findout that , I was missing to add related info objects of the inforprovider .added those info objects to auth analysis object.
Now query is working fine without errors;
problem is i am not able to restict the query since it showing all the data ; i am trying to put only few values in "0wbs_elemt " .
I added 0wbs_elemt in my analysis auth object;
Clicked on 0wbs_elemt and kept values in value authorizations and also kept wbsh in hierarchy name , selected type 1, HI 0.
still i am unable to restrict the data;
Functinal consultants build WBSE set up on a hierarchy. like
18ICT-07/2011
      18ICT-07/2011-1
            18ICT-07/2011-1-AUDTM
                  18ICT-07/2011-1-AUDTM-01
            18ICT-07/2011-1-CETX_
                  18ICT-07/2011-1-CETX_-01
they want to restrict like if we are giving 181ct-07 then they want to access every thing under it;
same way like 181ct-08 etc etc..
looks like they want to restrict the date very granuler level like restriction on " Attribute Navigation   "
Can anybody please do let me know how can we achieve Navigation Restriction.
Thanks.

":" in analysis authorisation objects

Hi,
We made 0DEPARTMENT as authorisation relevant.
In one of our Analysis Authorisation Objects(Rsecadmin) Settings for 0DETARTMENT IS = :
What exactly ":" represents
Thanks in advance

Hi,
The colon( value is used in BW to authorise display of aggregates. If you are using company code in the free characteristics and do not restrict on it to authorised values, you need to maintain : for it. Once you drill down on it (or equivalently put it in the rows) you need the actual values to be maintained in the authorisations as well.
Have you investigated the use of authorisation variables? You can maintain the values 1000 and 3000 in the authorisation and restrict the characteristic with an authorisation variable. This will ensure that the query is run for only the authorised values. This will work irrespective of whether you use company code in the rows or free characteristics.
Thanks,
Venkat

Interface Settings Error, Business Objects Planning, Templates

Hello all,
I am getting an error in interface settings whenever I have tried to run a template.
I have searched these forums and wikis and been googling for days and have not found anything even remotely relevant.
This company is using Business Objects Planning, version 11.10.1325.0
Platform is Windows Server 2003 SP2. Excel version 11.0
They have been using BOP for two years. They have been manually copying actuals data (i.e. historic data) into the template-derived workbooks for budget and forecast and them saving them for users. The consultants did not leave them with templates that loaded historic data from the SQL server, nor did the consultants even tell them about write-back (save-to-database) reports (which are what I am used to building).
In the short term I have been asked to get their templates working properly.
A week ago I logged a request with the consultants (SAP gold partners) but have yet to hear back.
We have tried starting at the basics and building a very simple template that follows the examples given in the users guide.
(i.e. the Planning Professional Edition Plan Administrators Guide, note that the consultants did not leave copies of the guides that matched the BOP version, so I downloaded the correct editions for this installation, but the basics are the same.)
So I have a template that has account ("ACC" for this organisation, "ACCT" in the Guide) in cell A1.
Row 1 then contains the Other Column to write back to in cell E1 (ESourcePY for this test), and Row 1 is even coloured pastel green.
Row 2 is coloured pastel yellow just like in the Guide and contains "Control Row for Interface" in cell B2 and the Time Series to read from in cell E2 - SSANYB_TOT, which basically means NYB_TOT for this company.
Rows 3 - 6 are coloured purple and cell B3 holds "Summary Print control Row". I have tried "SRCPrintControl" in cell H3 and I have tried without it. I have tried "Monthly Print Control Row" in B4 and I have tried without it (and SRCPrintControl in H4).
And then I have a number of natural accounts in cells A21:A24, I have tried using just one ACC and I have tried them on different lines, but in the end I put them on the same line as the ones in the Guide start at.
I have also tried with and without "HDR" in the cells in the H column.
My Settings sheet has been exactly as the one in the Guide, and I have tried with only a Summary in the Printing section, deleting the Monthly stuff, I have also tried changing the Border Columns and Rows but I am not too sure that is relevant.
The relevant sheet in the Interface Setting book is exactly as the one in the Guide but using the local Time Series and Target Sheet Name etc., although I have tried using the write-back target (ESourcePY) Other Column in the Target Column Name instead of SSANYB_TOT as shown in the Guide.
There is one difference; this organisation is not using Standard Planning Methodologies (no client I have seen uses them) and so that cell (B11) is empty.
But all I ever get, no matter how many variations or modification I try is :
"Error in interface settings of Default Interface interface on control row or column in temp1 sheet. Do you want to continue?"
Can anybody please shed some light on what is missing?
Thanks in advance,
Kai
P.S. This seems to lose all format/structure when uploaded, but it is all in paragraphs with white space when I write/edit it.
Edited by: Kai Richmond on Feb 22, 2010 6:00 AM

NOT ANSWERED
But a month and no answer means that obviously no-one on this planet, including the SAP help desk, knows the answer.
Business Objects used to have a really good help desk based in Singapore. Yeah, their consultant partners in Australia were not very good, but the help desk was very helpful and proactive.
Now that SAP has acquired the product the 'gold partners' are still useless but the SAP help desk is just a joke. The help 'portal' is just a door to a void, the responses are very tardy, and the majority of the points they raise have already been answered by me in previous communications to the same staffer. Obviously they don't read your replies.
I have already advised one client away from purchasing this product and I cannot see how in good conscience I could ever recommend BOP (or SAP) to any client in the future. Cognos is good, but IBM has no mainframe finance package; so I think that Oracle and Hyperion Planning are probably going to be the way of the future now.
Edited by: Kai Richmond on Mar 17, 2010 12:43 PM

Transcation code to view planned & actual

hi gurus,
is there any transcation code to view planned & actual for production costing & sale revenue i.e for valuated and non valuated.
Regards,
RAM

In a hierarchy you can have a combination of various characteristics, e.g Company code, profit center and material. If you have such a hierarchy set up, you can then view in the sub hierarchy, first the company code, then, when you expand the node of company code, it shows the profit centers within, then further when exploded, it shows the materials within that profit center.
Hierarchy is the top most level, that you have created, Sub hierarchies are the nodes within, You can get the data summarized at various level.

Analysis Authorization Object not working

Hi Gurus,
I m working on BI 7.0, I have created an analysis authorization object zz_div for 0DIVISION characteristic.
For a given report i want a given user to view only data for '32' and '33' 0DIVISION.
I have followed the below steps but still the report shows all data instead of restricted one.
1)RSECADMIN -> Maintenance ->zz_div ->Create
2) Add 0DIVISION in Auth structure , and in details
I     EQ     32
I     EQ     33
3) Add 0TCAIPROV with I     EQ     0SD_C03
4) Add 0TCAACTVT, 0TCAKYFNM, 0TCAVALID, this having details as
I     CP     *
5) Then in User tab -> Assignment -> User -> Change-> Inserted ZZ_DIV-> Save
6) In Query created a Authorization variable(with no input prompt) and restricted 0DIVISION.
Following are the authorization object in that user's Role (Reporting Only)
S_RFC
S_TCODE
S_GUI
S_BDS_D
S_BDS_DS
S_OC_SEND
S_RS_AUTH - only having zz_div
S_RS_COMP
S_RS_COMP1
S_RS_ICUBE
S_RS_RSTT
S_RS_TOOLS
S_RS_PARAM
I have surfed lots of thread for this issue but not getting a solution
Tell me what i m missing in above or any additional setting need before creating analysis authorization
Edited by: Sonal Patel on Apr 18, 2009 8:10 AM

Hi
Thanks a Ton for ur reply
I have checked in SPRO : Analysis Authorization
where the authorization mode is " OLD obsolete Concept With RSR Authorization Objects "
We have to do the same in Production system .Can u please how its going to effect to others authorizations if change it to New Concept
Thanks
Sonal....

Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
Regards,
Salman

Salman,
What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
Regards,
Shivraj Singh

Plan/actual variance per month in a single report

Hi gurus,
MY client requirement is to get the plan/actuals/variance on monthly basis.
can we get that
i said S_ALR_870100185 actual costs montly
S_ALR_870100186 planned costs monthly
please dont say we can achieve it with a new development because i even have the same answer
they need a joint report of these two can we get that
its an urgent issue
thanks in advance
regards
hussain

Hi,
Check these URL's,
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B5VK9X3nnz9rOTIyZGU5ODMtZGUxZC00OTJiLTg5OWMtNjBkOGVkNTRjZjIw&hl=en_US
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B5VK9X3nnz9rNzAxMmNhZjEtMTA2Ni00OGE1LWE2ODctMDM2MTNkNTI4ODQw&hl=en_US
I have uploaded them in google docs.
Check if you can open them.
Regards,
Gokul

Creation of Hierarchy-Analyse summarization Object : Plan/Actual Comparisio

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for