Creation of SNP planned order in Monthly Bucket though CTM plan

Hi,
Can anyone advise how to aggregate the SNP planned order generated after CTM run in Monthly bucket.
Can it be done through customizing?
Regards.
Punit

system switches over to external procurement in place of in house production only when you use optimizer.
Heuristic will do this only if there is a SNP PPM/PDS and the resource calendar prevents timely production.
Regards
Nitin Thatte

Similar Messages

  • Split SNP planned order to weekly buckets

    Hi all,
    does anyone knows a way to split SNP planned order to weekly buckets from monthly buckets?
    the planner enters his production forecast in SNP94 in monthly buckets, but for purchasing prefer to see the demand weekly, i need an automatic split of planned order (something like the split of forecast).

    to split the component will not help, the need is to distribute the finish goods through the month on weekly buckets, once the finish goods are on weekly bucket, i don't care if the all the components demand is at the beginning of the period.
    i need a macro or heuristic to split the quantity, see the example below, the planner has monthly view in which he had entered 55,000 PC for month 10.2014, before i transfer this quantity to the ECC i need to split it to weekly buckets:
    simple MRP run will not work, because the planner may plan to produce more than the total demand.

  • ASCP Planned orders in period buckets (Weekly or Monthly)

    Hi,
    We see that the ASCP planned order due dates are pushed to friday of week (if in weekly buckets) or last friday of the month (if in Monthly buckets).
    What is causing this behaviour? Is there any profile option/plan option cuasing this to happen.
    Any help in regard is most appreciated.
    Regards,
    Anand

    Hi Guru,
    1) Please check the maximum earliness & lateness of a receipt under Pegging in Demand tab of APO material master is defined.
    2) In SNP2 tab, check the period split whether the data is blank.  If it is 2, the planning data will get disagregated and released from middle of bucket.
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • PPDS - Product hurestic giving planned  orders six month later

    Dear All
    I m facing a prooblem while executing the product heurisitc in APO-PPDS. Problem is that planned orders are scheduled six month later even though the requirments are in early period. I hv checked the resource capacity and time profile. In addition I hv also run the report /SAPAPO/CRES_CAPACITY_LENGTHEN. Still the orders are postponed.
    Please suggest what can be the possible causes for this error.
    Thnx
    VS

    I faced a similar problem but while creating orders manually in APO. Here is the link to the thread; you may like to refer it if some of the solutions provided would be of help:
    Order created with Delay in RRP3 page
    In my case the Transportation Lead Time + GR Processing time was making the orders shifted in the future...

  • Planned Order and Purchase Requisition for total Plan

    HI
    As per my client requirement whenever i am giving a plan in Demand Management in MD61 say for quantity 100. System should create purchase requisition for quantity 40 and Planned Order of 60.
    Please let me know if it is possible.
    Regards,
    Anand

    HI
    Thanks a lot. Its working with quota arrangement.
    Regards,
    Anand.

  • SNP planned order availability date difference between APO and ECC

    Hi,
    I have observed that SNP Planned order availability date is not matching between APO and ECC. Details are as follows.
    I ran SNP Optimizer with bucket offset of 0.5. After publishing the optimizer created planned orders to ECC, only start date is matching.
    Example:
    I am using PDS as a source of supply.
    Fixed production activity in SNP PDS is 1 day.
    GR processing time: 3 day
    After running optimizer planned order is created with dates explained below.
    Start date/time: 09.05.2011 00:00:00
    End date/time: 12.05.2011 23:59:59
    Availability date: 16.05.2011 00:00:00
    Because of bucket offset defined as 0.5 optimizer planned order availability is start of next monday.
    After publishing this planned order to ECC dates on the planned order is as follows.
    Start date: 09.05.2011
    End date: 09.05.2011
    Availability date: 12.05.2011
    I have not maintained any scheduling margin key in ECC. Also if I dont define the GR processing time, planned dates between APO and ECC always match. Can anyone explain the impact of GR time on the availability date.
    Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi Venkadesh,
    What's "state stamp"? Do you mean different time zone?
    note : 645597  mentioned by Nandha is very helpful:
    In standard, CCR will use duedate - "the available date of the output product".
    Nandha's words "In SAP APO, if the receipt date of the primary product deviates from the
    end date of the last activity of the order, the receipt date
    always identifies this as inconsistent. You cannot rectify
    inconsistencies of this type by using CCR."
    I guess in your PDS or PPM, the output product is not assigned to the End of the last activity. Someone changed it?
    Please CIF the PDS or PPM again.
    If you really want to apply a note, please use note 815509 as you're using planned order,
    and system will use order end  date in CCR instead.
    GR time is always considered. BR/Tiemin

  • Deployment of SNP Planned orders

    Dear Expert,
    We have one scenario where there is a requirement to deploy SNP Planned orders. How much it is advisable to deploy SNP Planned orders?
    What will be the impact on the dates of shipment proposals made by TLB, when SNP Planned order will get converted in Planned order and production order.
    Also I observed one strange behaviour of deployment, when I try to deploy planned order by putting ATD receipts as planned order in SNP2 tab, some times it considers the planned order for deployment but many time it doesn't.
    Is there any specific settings other than ATD reciepts in SNP2 tab of product location master data?
    Thanks & Regards

    Dear Samuel/Amol,
    Thanks for your reply. Let me frame this question again
    Letu2019s consider that I have maintained SNP planned orders in ATD Receipts. After running deployment, system will look for SNP Planned order as receipt element in Pull deployment horizon and create DepConRel .  TLB only considers DepConRel for conversion into STO, irrespective of stock is available or not.
    Now consider the situation where STO is ready with some specific Delivery & committed dates but there is no stock. When SNP Planned order will get converted into planned order and Production order, its date will change and actual stock may not be ready on that specific committed date.
    So my entire intension is to know how much it is advisable to deploy SNP Planned order.
    Samuel/Amol, did you get a chance to work on SNP Planned order deployment and its impact on the dates of STO?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Chetan

  • Planned Order creation for Sales Order and Purchase Order

    Hi
    We have a following requirement.
    In normal scenario when we have demand for material  which was created by MD61 and in addition to that if there is Sales Order the 1st planned order gets revised.To better expalin this consider possible scenario
    You create plan via MD61 for 200 qty .The system creates Planned Order for 200.
    Now there is Sales Order for 150 peices.Then what happens is original  Planed Order of 200 is changed to 50 and another planned order is created for 150 peices.The requirement is not summed.
    Now in new scenario instead of Sales Order there is Intercompany Purchase Order of 150 peices.
    Now the system is not changing original Planned Order of 200,but it created another planned order of 150.So now there are 2 Planned Orders of 150 and 200.
    What I want to know is there any way wherein the system will reduce the original planned order (similar to Sales Order scenario)
    Regards

    Hi,
    Use Strategy 52 in urs case.
    PIR witll be created .
    None convertable planned order will be created.
    Once you get sales order for that material.
    New planned order will be created which will consume PIR( planned order ).
    Eg.
    PIR 10.
    Planned order 10 qty.
    Sales oder 6
    Planned order for SO 6 qty
    Planned order through pir will become 4 qty.
    Regards,
    Vishal

  • Planned Order Creation

    Hi Team,
    For a material which has 5 sales orders, how can MRP be configured so that 5 planned orders are created (i.e, 1 planned order per sales order) one than 1 planned order with the requirements for all 5 sales orders?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
      For solving your problem i think you need to choose a Optimum  Lot sizing Procedure as the Lot size.
      Past Period Balancing:(sp)
      Starting from the sucessive dates sucessive reqmts are grouped together to
    form a lot until sum of storage costs equals lot size independent costs.
    Least Unit Cost Procedure:( w1)
    Starting from the sucessive dates sucessive reqmts are grouped together to
    form a lot until total costs per unit reach a minimum level.
    Dynamic Lotsize Dy)
    Starting from the sucessive dates sucessive reqmts are grouped together to
    form a lot until storage costs becomes greater than lot size independent costs..
    Regards,
    nandha

  • For a target based production creation of Number of planned orders reg

    For a target based production, can anybody explain as to how the planned orders created/altered. The main question is the system generated planned orders can be altered, suppose the system generates 10 planned orders can we alter to 8 planned orders if so how?

    Vachanala,
    The way I understood "Target Based" production is that it is an MTS scenario and the Material is assigned with Planning strategy 11 in MRP3 view.
    For this you need to PIR(Target) using transaction MD61 with requuirement type "BSF". Once this is done, you can run MRP using MD02 if for single material or run in background using MDBT transaction. Planned orders are created based on the target(PIR).
    You can manually change the planned order dates or quantity in the change mode of the planned order, and system firms this planned order.
    Hope this information helps...
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Help with supply and demand query using monthly buckets

    I'm working on a query bound for Discoverer which pulls the aggregated supply and demand for an item and buckets it into months. So for any given item, I need to show the item, onhand, cost, aggregated supply (planned orders, requisitions, pos), and aggregated demand (planned order demand, jobs) - all bucketed by months.
    The code below works okay to find all of the data for July, but I also need to show August and September. I'm thinking I could use a union but am reluctant because the query already runs kind of slow and I'm not sure if I'm on the right track.
    Database Server
    RDBMS : 10.2.0.3.0
    Oracle Applications : 11.5.9
    -Tracy
    select
          item.inventory_item_id, item.organization_code, item.item, item.description
        , item.make_buy,item.planner_code
        , planned.compile_designator, planned.order_type_text, sum(planned.quantity_rate)planned_total
        , planned.mrp_sugg_due_month
        , sum(job.required_quantity-job.quantity_issued)job_open, job.required_month
        , onhand.total_qoh
        , purchase.item_revision prev, purchase.promised_month, purchase.ship_to_organization_id 
        , sum((purchase.quantity-purchase.quantity_cancelled)-purchase.quantity_received)po_open  
        , req.item_revision rrev, req.destination_organization_id, req.org_id, req.need_by_month
        , sum((req.quantity-req.quantity_cancelled)-req.quantity_delivered)req_open
        , cost.item_cost,cost.cost
    from
    --item--
    (select mtl.inventory_item_id, mtl.segment1 item,mtl.description,decode(mtl.planning_make_buy_code,1,'Make',2,'Buy') make_buy
            ,mtl.organization_id, mtp.organization_code, mtl.planner_code
           ,to_char(add_months(sysdate,+1),'YYYY_MM')month1, to_char(add_months(sysdate,+2),'YYYY_MM')month2
           ,to_char(add_months(sysdate,+3),'YYYY_MM')month3
    from    inv.mtl_system_items_b mtl, inv.mtl_parameters mtp
    where    mtl.organization_id = mtp.organization_id
    )item,
    --planned orders - 3 months --
    (select compile_designator,organization_id,inventory_item_id,order_type_text,nvl(quantity_rate,0)quantity_rate,new_due_date
           ,to_char(trunc(new_due_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM')mrp_sugg_due_month
    from   apps.mrp_orders_sc_v
    where  order_type_text in ('Planned order','Planned order demand')
    and    to_char(trunc(new_due_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') <= to_char(add_months(:Month,+2),'YYYY_MM')
    and    to_char(trunc(new_due_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') >=  to_char(:Month,'YYYY_MM')
    )planned,
    --jobs - 3 months--
    (select organization_id,wip_entity_name job, inventory_item_id,concatenated_segments,nvl(required_quantity,0)required_quantity
            ,nvl(quantity_issued,0)quantity_issued, date_required,to_char(trunc(date_required,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') required_month
            ,wip_entity_id,creation_date, wip_job_status
    from    apps.wip_requirement_ops_inq_v
    where   primary_item_id <>inventory_item_id
    and     wip_job_status not in ('Closed','Cancelled','Complete')
    and     to_char(trunc(date_required,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') <= to_char(add_months(:Month,+2),'YYYY_MM')
    and     to_char(trunc(date_required,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') >= to_char(:Month,'YYYY_MM')
    )job,
    --qty onhand--
    (select  inventory_item_id,organization_id,sum(nvl(transaction_quantity,0))total_qoh
    from     inv.mtl_onhand_quantities_detail
    group by inventory_item_id, organization_id
    )onhand,
    -- po - 3 months--
    (select pol.item_id, pol.item_revision, nvl(pll.quantity,0)quantity, nvl(pll.quantity_received,0)quantity_received
          , nvl(pll.quantity_rejected,0),nvl(pll.quantity_cancelled,0)quantity_cancelled,poh.segment1 po_num
           ,pll.promised_date, to_char(trunc(pll.promised_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM')promised_month
           ,pll.shipment_num,pll.ship_to_organization_id 
    from   po.po_lines_all pol, po.po_headers_all poh, po.po_line_locations_all pll
    where  poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id
    and    pol.po_header_id = pll.po_header_id
    and    pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id
    and    pol.cancel_flag != 'Y'
    and    pol.item_id is not null
    and    to_char(trunc(pll.promised_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM')<= to_char(add_months(:Month,+2),'YYYY_MM')
    and    to_char(trunc(pll.promised_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM')>=  to_char(:Month,'YYYY_MM')
    )purchase,
    --reqs - 3 months--
    (select prh.segment1 req_number,nvl(prl.quantity,0)quantity,nvl(prl.quantity_delivered,0)quantity_delivered
           ,nvl(prl.quantity_cancelled,0)quantity_cancelled
           ,prl.destination_organization_id,prl.org_id,prl.item_id,prl.item_revision,prl.need_by_date
           ,to_char(trunc(prl.need_by_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM')need_by_month
    from   po.po_requisition_headers_all prh, po.po_requisition_lines_all prl
    where  prh.requisition_header_id = prl.requisition_header_id(+)
    and    nvl(prl.cancel_flag,'N') !='Y'
    and    prh.authorization_status != 'CANCELLED'
    and    to_char(trunc(prl.need_by_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') <= to_char(add_months(:Month,+2),'YYYY_MM')
    and    to_char(trunc(prl.need_by_date,'MM'),'YYYY_MM') >=  to_char(:Month,'YYYY_MM')
    )req,
    --cost--
    (select msib.inventory_item_id,msib.organization_id,cqm.material_cost,cic.item_cost
    ,(case when cqm.material_cost=0 then cic.item_cost else cqm.material_cost end) cost, cqm.cost_group_id
    from inv.mtl_system_items_b msib
         ,(select cql.cost_group_id,cql.inventory_item_id,cql.organization_id,cql.layer_quantity,cql.material_cost,mp.organization_code
             from bom.cst_quantity_layers cql, inv.mtl_parameters mp
            where mp.default_cost_group_id = cql.cost_group_id) cqm
        ,bom.cst_item_costs cic
    where msib.inventory_item_id = cqm.inventory_item_id(+)
    and msib.organization_id = cqm.organization_id(+)
    and msib.inventory_item_id = cic.inventory_item_id(+)
    and msib.organization_id = cic.organization_id(+)
    )cost
    where item.inventory_item_id = job.inventory_item_id(+)
    and   item.organization_id = job.organization_id(+)
    and   item.month1 = job.required_month(+)  -- 2009_07 --
    and   item.inventory_item_id = onhand.inventory_item_id(+)
    and   item.organization_id = onhand.organization_id(+)
    and   item.inventory_item_id = purchase.item_id(+)
    and   item.month1 = purchase.promised_month(+)  -- 2009_07 --
    and   item.inventory_item_id = req.item_id(+)
    and   item.month1 = req.need_by_month(+)  -- 2009_07 --
    and   item.inventory_item_id = cost.inventory_item_id(+)
    and   item.organization_id = cost.organization_id(+)
    and   item.inventory_item_id = planned.inventory_item_id(+)
    and   item.organization_id = planned.organization_id(+)
    and   item.month1 = planned.mrp_sugg_due_month(+)  -- 2009_07 --
    and   item.make_buy = 'Buy'
    and   item.item in ('161309040','744L755','150-GFM') --test items --
    group by item.inventory_item_id,item.organization_code,item.item,item.description,item.make_buy,item.planner_code
          ,job.required_month ,onhand.total_qoh , purchase.item_revision,  purchase.promised_month
            ,purchase.ship_to_organization_id  ,cost.item_cost,cost.cost
           ,req.item_revision, req.destination_organization_id,req.org_id,req.need_by_month
           ,planned.compile_designator,planned.order_type_text,planned.mrp_sugg_due_month
    order by item.organization_code,item.item

    Hi,
    Six things:
    (1) Where are the one-to-many relationships between your tables? If a single row in mtl can match two (or more) rows in mrp, and can also match two (or more) rows in wip, then it looks like, when you join both of them them, you'll have a chasm trap, that is, you'll get all the matching rows from mrp paired with all matching rows from wip. Are you sure your existing query is producing the right results?
    Are there one-to-many relationships with the other tables in your original query?
    (2) Are your DATEs always at midnight? If not, avoid using BETWEEN and LAST_DAY for DATE comparisons: otherwise you'll miss everything between 00:00:01 and 23:59:59 on the last day.
    That is, instead of
    and     mrp.new_due_date(+) BETWEEN :Month AND LAST_DAY(ADD_MONTHS(:Month,2))ypou should say
    and       mrp.new_due_date (+)     >= :Month
    and       mrp.new_due_date (+)     <  ADD_MONTHS (:Month, 3)(3) The basic way to pivot the months of mrp_due_date is:
    SELECT    ...
    ,       NVL ( SUM ( CASE
                     WHEN  mrp.new_due_date >= :month
                     AND   mrp.new_due_date < ADD_MONTHS (:month, 1)
                     THEN  mrp.quantity_rate
                    END
               , 0
               )          AS mrp_qty_0
    ,       NVL ( SUM ( CASE
                     WHEN  mrp.new_due_date >= ADD_MONTHS (:month, 1)
                     AND   mrp.new_due_date <  ADD_MONTHS (:month, 2)
                     THEN  mrp.quantity_rate
                    END
               , 0
               )          AS mrp_qty_1When you do this, do not GROUP BY TRUNC (mrp.new_due_date, 'MM').
    The code above does two months: I'm sure you get the idea for how to do more.
    To get dynamic column headings (such as Jun_2009 or "2009-06" instead of the generic mrp_qty_o) requires dynamic SQL. The best way to do dynamic SQL depends on the tool that is producing the query (e.g. SQL*Plus). What are you using? Are you willing to change, if it helps?
    (4) Displaying separate columns from one row as a single column on multiple rows is called unpivoting. How badly do you want to do that? Your query would be simpler and faster if the output had only one row per group (rather than one row for mrp_qty and another row for wip_wty). That one row could have six columns (e.q. June_mrp, June_wip, July_mrp, July_wip, August_mrp and August_wip) instead of three. Depending on your front-end tool, you might even be able to wrap the single row of output so that it always appeared as two rows, each with three columns.
    (5) Sorry I told you to do
    and     mrp.order_type_text(+) in (...)I never use the + outer-join notation any more, so I forgot about the ORA-01719 error. There's no problem having an outer-join condition like that using ANSI notation. (One more reason to switch.)
    (6) As you noticed, this site doesn't like to print the &lt;&gt; inequality operator, even inside tags.
    Use the equivalent != operator instead, when posting on this site.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • What is equivalent ASCP report for Planned Order&Order Reschedule Report

    What is equivalent report for Supply Chain Planned Order Report & Supply Chain Order Reschedule Report
    We are currently on MRP and running Supply Chain Planned Order Report successfully. We are planning to go to ASCP(Decentralized) next month ,what is the equivalent reports in ASCP?
    Edited by: SanDan on Jan 9, 2013 1:57 PM

    Hi ,
    You can explore the Planning Detail Report which you can run against your ascp plan. However there are few standard reports available in ascp. I suggest you can explore option of building custom report which will be best suited to your business needs (i.e. using Discoverer or if you are also implementing obiee you can build a custom report based on standard views or noitex views (- for ascp)
    Regards
    narendra

  • Planned Order to STR Conversion - incorrect Valuation Price

    Hi Experts
    Not sure if you've encountered this before:-
    Material A in Requesting Plant has Valuation Price of USD10.
    Material A in Supplying Plant has Valuation Price of USD20.
    Material A is planned through MRP in Requesting Plant with Planned Order as the output.
    When Planned Order is converted into STR (MD14/MD15), the Valuation Price appearing in the STR picks up USD10 (from Requesting Plant), even though Supplying Plant is correctly defaulted in the STR.
    Any idea on the above?
    Another observation - for the same STR created, if the Supplying Plant is cleared in Change Mode (ME52N), system will reassign the supplying plant accordingly, and the Supplying Plant (USD20) is now correctly updated into the STR.
    Thanks in advance

    the valuation price of a purchase requisition is always copied from material master valuation view of the ordering plant.
    there is no difference for requisition that is used for a stock transfer order to a sister plant, compared to a requisition that is used to purchase from an external vendor. It would be very confusing if SAP has a logic break within.
    the valuation is used for release strategy.
    most requisitions do not know from where they will be fullfilled, source determination is not mandatory in requisition creation process. this is the usual task of purchasing department. Hence the requisition can only know the valuation price of its own plant.

  • APO Planned Order

    Hi Experts,
    I have a problem with the generated planned orders whenever i run location heuristic. It produces planned orders more than the demand. I have Push deployment Horizon defined, and also Pull deployment Horizon both at 150days. But in the Deployment Profile, Push Distribution, Pull is defined. Could it be because of that?
    I really hope that you can help me.
    Many thanks.
    Best Regards,
    Ria

    Hi Ria,
                    I am a little confused looking at this post.
    The deployment settings have got nothing to do with SNP location heuristics.
    The amount of planned order generated is based on the lot size profile and the rounding defined in the material master lot size tab.
    Deployment settings are only effective for the deployment part of the planning.
    I am also confused looking at your comment: "I also noticed that there are no requirement pegged to the snp planned orders created. Only the ppds planned orders."
    You mean the SNP and PPDs orders are created for the same horizon?? This is impossible.
    If you have a SNP order generated based on a forecast and then a PPDS run is done, the PPDS order deletes and replaces the SNP order. They don't co-exist.
    Unless created manually you should see all system generated receipts to be pegged to requirements in pegging tab in product view (RRP3).
    Please clarify so that I can may be clarify.

  • Reassign of components in planned order

    Hi,
    Client wants to change the components assigned to one operation to the other operation in a planned order.I didnot find any thing such in standard process. Please help me out . Is any thing i can do to do it.
    Good answers are rewarded.
    Kalyan

    Hi ,
    Dont write unnecessery comments If u dont know the requirement of client.
    It is how the client wants bcoz he keeps the planned order one month before he converts to production order .
    In standard i am unabel to find the components assigned to operation in planned order.
    I know that in production order we can reassign it. I too didnt able to find it in anywhere in planned order. But i may be wrong right and no one knows everything in SAP.
    kalyan
    Edited by: kalyan Reddy S on Nov 21, 2008 8:41 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • MSI GTX560ti Hawk low 3dmark11 score

    I recently purchased MSI GTX560ti Hawk. I ran 3dmark11 on it and on performance mode, I only got P1650 score. The graphics score is very low and the FPS averaged around 6-7. Here is my specs: Asus P5Q motherboard Gigabyte Odin GT 550w PSU Intel Q9550

  • My 4th gen ipod nano wont accept mp4.

    I tried converting youtube videos to mp4 on zamzar. I even tried converting it to ipod. It used to accept these videos but recently it will say: "____" was not copied to "___" because it cannot be played on this ipod. I have no idea what to do.

  • What video cameras are compatible with Final Cut Express?

    I live in Japan and was thinking of buying a Victor " Full High Definition" video camera (1920x1080). The only thing I was warned about by the salesperson is that unless I have a Blue-Ray DVD recorder/player, I will never be able to enjoy true Full H

  • Spot healing brush opaque

    I've been using CS5 for a couple of weeks now, with no problem with the spot healing brush & content aware.  Now all of a sudden it is very opaque, and won't "erase" or remove anything....its just a faint gray smudge.  I must have changed some settin

  • In need of Printer drivers for HP Deskjet 930C for Windows 7 32 bit Enterprise?

    Have been Online in HP support and folllowed all steps and that didnt work.  Called HP rep and that didn't work.  Hp still sell the cartridges, so not sure why I can't get drivers for my printer.