Credit block in third party
Hi,
while creating third party sales order because of credit it is blocking when i remove the block in VKM3 again back to sales order here purchase org. is missing it is required field. If i give a purchase org. here and if i try to save again but once again it is blocking because of credit block. this cycle will continue. Can anybody help in this issue.
br
baachi
Hi,
Pls check settings in SPRO and look in FD32 whether it Simple Credit / Dynamic Credit Check and remove the block and just give a warning message.
Regards,
Vinod
Similar Messages
-
Credit Check with Third Party Process
Hi Gurz,
I know about third party process but my problem is with credit check of the customers.
If customer has not got enough credit limit to process the order in normal senario credit controller has to manually release the order as system blocks it. In third party process system will give you warning message when saving sales order about customer credit limit but allows you to save sales order. Once saving sales order it authomatically creates Purchase Requisition. From PR purchasing creates P.O. with out knowing about customer credit limit issue. and so on. In other words goods supplied to customer even though credit limit has exceeded. This user don't know untill raising the invoice to the customer which is too late.
Can we stop creating Purchase requisition or block purchase requistion for credit check ? or there are better way of handling the process for credit check?
Thanks in advanceHi,
Try to implement OSS note -738171 - Delivery block does not influence purchase requisition.
Following is the details of the note;
Summary
Symptom
The delivery block in a sales order does not prevent the generattion of the purchase requisition in a third-party or individual purchase order item. Regardless of the Customizing settings in the delivery block, the system confirms the TAB or TAS item and generates the purchase requisition.
More Terms
Order, purchase requisition, PReq, TAB, individual purchase order, individual purchase order item, TAS, third-party, third-party item, SD order, delivery block, VBAK-LIFSK, VBEP-LIFSP
Cause and Prerequisites
Solution
Create a user-specific user requirement (for example, 902: BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN_902 in Include LV07A902) as a copy of standard user requirement 102 and assign it to requirement 'Preq' by using Transaction OVB5.
In the source code of the user-requirement, program a check for the delivery block which, if necessary, triggers an ERROR_EXCEPTION which prevents the generation of the purchase requisition.
You can use the existing check for the credit block as a template.
Regards, -
Credit management configuration in Third party sales
Dear All,
Please let me know , what are the configuration setting for Credit Management in Third Party Sales.
Regards
SKumarHi...
For Third Party, since there is no Delivery and PGI, the block can be at Billing.
however the total outstanding value from the customer at the time of billing along with the days as set in the credit limit shall be basis of blocking.
Config Steps:
u2022 Assigned the credit control area to the company code
Financial Accounting (New) Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Credit management Credit Control Account Assign Permitted Credit Control Area to Company Code
u2022 Assign Sale Document and Delivery Document, The credit limit check for the selected sales document type is set to automatic control.
Sales and Distribution Basic Functions Credit management / Risk management Credit Management Assign Sales Documents and Delivery Document Credit limit check for order types
u2022 Assigning Risk Category to Credit Control Area
Financial Accounting (New) Accounts Receivable and Account Payable Credit management Credit Control Account Define Risk Categories
u2022 Defining Automatic Credit Control
Financial Supply Chain Management Credit Management Integration with Accounts Receivable Accounting and Sales and Distribution Integration with Sales and Distribution Define Automatic Credit Control -
This evening, I got a "VZW free msg" alerting me that a phone on my account had "made a charge with a third-party vendor." This is the second such message I've gotten this billing period. The messages are identical. My bill for the current billing period won't be ready till this weekend, so I have no way to track down any details. The phone belongs to my wife, and I am absolutely certain that she has not billed anything to her phone. The maddening thing about these messages is they give no details. Who's the third-party vendor? How much was the charge? What did my wife supposedly buy? No such details appear in the text message, and I can't find details anywhere on the My Verizon site.
This text message does add: "For details or to block such charges: www.verizonwirel." (That's correct as written—I presume some of the message got truncated. That's how the message appeared both times.) However, I can't find any documentation about how to block these charges.
After I got the first of these messages, I called Verizon's customer service number (800.922.0204). A very pleasant gentleman noted my concern and checked my account. He found no such third-party charges, and he advised me to look carefully at my next bill. I left it at that until I got the second message this evening.
Speaking of customer service: This evening, I tried twice calling Verizon's customer service number. Both times, the call ended with a recorded voice telling me, "I'm sorry, but your call cannot be processed at this time. Please try your call later." Huh? Why not an offer to leave my number for a call-back? They as much as hung up on me. Not impressed. And, by the way, why doesn't Verizon post their customer service number on the Web site? I had to dig up the number by way of www.gethuman.com.Contact us on every page has the number.
*611 from your device works as well.
That third party stuff is probably "cramming" Verizon just got hit with this practice which is illegal.
The law states you can call Verizon up and have them place a permenant block on third party services.
They cannot refuse and you do not have to pay for them.
Notify the FCC http://www.FCC.gov or the Federal Trade Commission http://www.FTC.gov
Good Luck -
MIGO Is mandatery in Credit memo in 3rd party ?
Dear SD Experts ,
i know the 3rd party processing But i have One Doubt please explain me
2 Steps we have to do In Third part return process.
link tells
http://scn.sap.com/thread/987949
1 Flow to bring the stock from Customer is
va01 return order ( W/O Ref) --vl01n- Ref deli---MIGO ---VF01 ( Credit memo with ref to Return delivery )
2 Flow to Send the stock from company to vendor
ME21N( Ret PO )-- MIGO---MIRO ( Credit memo with ref to Ret po )
i know this flow is Right to credit memo in 3 Rd party But in both cases MIGO IS Mandatory or not ?
Second thing is TASG Is item category For credit memo in third party ..i have checked in VOV7
But i didnt understand this where i will insert /
Thanks a lotDear Madhuri ..
You mentioned is How to bring stock From Customer and sending to vendor Right
This is special process
Coming to TASG Item category , i have to tell you How credit memo is created in Third party process
I Am telling as per My knowledge
Now create credit memo ....Create credit memo Req ( G2) with ref to Invoice not with Third party sales order
While maintaining in VF01 Maintain Billing type G2S Only Not G2
Coming to TASG Item cat in copy control we have to make Between TAS --TASG Item category level In the Sales document type to Billing document type source and Target doc.
Dear Mentors please Tell me if i am wrong .
Thanks a lot -
Third party sale and stockable item
Hi all , We have some products . For example "A " . We buy it from one vendor and maintain its stock and sale it as and when order comes . Same product when there is demand we sale it by third party process instead of holding the stocks we instruct vendor to send the delivery directly to customer . Process is similar to third party process in SAP . For such material how can I make material master.
1>> which Material type I have to maintain on first screen ?
2>> what will be the other configuration or values in other fields of masterHi,
Please search for the SAP building blocks for Third party sale with Shipping and Third party sale W/O shipping
U can use FERT as material type only
regards,
sujit -
IS-OIL: Exchange Third-party feedstock material for on-spec material
Dear All,
We are using SAP ERP ECC 6.0 + IS-Oil Downstream and we are trying to figure out how to record the following business flow in the system:
1. A third-party partner send us feedstock/off-spec material to our oil depot for an exchange with on-spec material
2. We give them on-spec material and charge fees based on the cost of processing the feedstock to on-spec material
We are thinking to use Buy/Sell exchange type, but when we buy the material, then there will be tax charge and material will be GR as valuated material , which we are trying to avoid.
Could we use Terminalling Agreement? GR the feedstock as non-valuated and then GI on-spec material (let's say Diesel) as non-valuated also (different material between GR and GI).. Or there is another way in SAP, regarding services to process third-party raw material to finished good material for Oil and Gas industry?
We are really appreciate your help..
Thank you,
John StallonHi,
Please search for the SAP building blocks for Third party sale with Shipping and Third party sale W/O shipping
U can use FERT as material type only
regards,
sujit -
NI UMI-7772 and third party Stepper Drives
Dear all
Now we want to control a stepper motor with voltage ratings up to 110 V and 0.5 A at 110 V
we have the 2 Axis PCI-7342 motion controller and the NI UMI-7772 Terminal block for third party motor drives
please advice , what is the suitable third-party stepper drive that can fullfill the above ratings and compatible with the UMI-7772 ??
i have found only one link for a company called ParkerMotion (check this link : http://www.parkermotion.com/literature/pdf/aries.pdf ) but I'm not sure if it is compatible with the UMI-7772 or not
waiting your replies and thanks in advance
Eng. Mohammed Ashraf
Certified LabVIEW Associated Developer
InnoVision Systems Founder, RF Test Development Engineer
www.ivsystems-eg.comAlmost any standard stepper or servo drive would be compatable with a UMI. The Parker Aries you have a link to is a servo drive, not a stepper drive. You motor ratings are unusual for a stepper motor. What is the brand and model? I have had good luck with Applied Motion stepper products. www.applied-motion.com
-
Hi,
I just upgraded to Flash player 10.0.45.2. I would like to review and choose my privacy settings.
When I go to the Settings manager through the online interface, I do not see the "Allow thrid-party Flash content to store..." as expected and as described in
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/546/4c68e546.html
Instead, I see
I want to set up my settings to allow to store information from the original domain, but NOT from third-party domains, how do I do this?
The first choice is in French and says :
'Allow Flash content to store information on your computer". There is no reference whatsoever to "third-party" information.
Is this normal? Is this a translation mistake? Does the first choice there apply to ALL information (so-called Flash cookies), from the originated domain AND from the third-party domains?
Second question: I can't seem to find how to see the Settings manager in English...
I am using Firefox, but I tried with Opera, and the Settings manager looked the same: no choice for "third-party" thinsg either.
My OS is Windows XP SP2 (French), but all my browsers are English, so I'd like to see the Flash settings in English, too.
Thanks for any help, I really want to block the third-party cookies, but not the others.Hi again,
Thanks for your time... but I'm still stuck.
The Language problem
I CAN change the language settings for the Global site, but the Flash Player settings 'live" window is ALWAYS in French, no matter what I do and which language I choose.
The Third-Party Settings problem:
As you said:
In English, the choices are:
Never ask again
Allow third party content to store data on your computer
Store common Flash components to reduce download times
In French, the choices are:
Ne plus demander (This is a correct translation of "Never ask again")
Autoriser le contenu Flash à enregistrer des données sur votre ordinateur : This is an INCOMPLETE OR WRONG translation, the french sentence means "Allow content to store data on your computer". There is NO MENTION of third-party here.
Stocker les composants Flash courants pour réduire la durée de téléchargement. This is a correct translation of "Store common Flash components to reduce download times.
So, am I to think that if I uncheck the second choice, I will disallow third-party stuff (as in the English sentence), or will it disallow ALL content to be stored (as in the French sentence), regardless of third-party or not?
This is very important for me, and for all the French speaking Flash player users.
I can't believe there is such a mistake in a product used as widely as the Flash player is...
The Website Storage settings are per website settings, I do not want to have to accept/deny each website individually, I want a global policy for disabling third-party cookies, exactly as the second choice in English is designed for.
Unfortunately, the French second choice (apparently) doesn't say the same, as it allows/disallows ALL contents.
Could someone from the Adobe translation team (or equivalent) help to solve this, maybe?
Regards and thanks for any help. -
Hello All
I have the fabulous E61, however, sadly have it on the UK Network 3, didn't think anything of it until recently tried to use Worldmate and Morange - 3 dont support third party software - I almost laughed down the phone. Can you believe that, with all the great software out there and 3 wont have it on their phones.
Anyway, after an email or 2, I am being called later today, to rectify this, apparently it can be done, so I'll wait and see and let you know if this is successful.Well had my call from 3 (call centre is completely useless). It has been confirmed that 3 block all third party applications, whether or not they are pre-installed on the phone by Nokia.
I have written a very strongly worded letter to the CEO of 3 - will wait and see if that does anything. Perhaps they will be able to flash the phone to get rid of the 3 **bleep**.
edited by Orinoco.Message Edited by orinoco on 15-Nov-2006
09:24 AM -
Third party source is trying to change my homepage.
I get a pop-up box stating that 'myfuncards' has blocked a third party attempt to change my homepage, then a 'Firefox' message saying someone is trying to trick it into downloading and update.
Your System Details List shows some extension that can be considered as malware and MyFunCards is among them
You can disable or uninstall all suspicious extensions that you didn't install yourself or that you aren't sure of.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_add-ons
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_toolbars -
Hi folks,
I have a scenario where a credit block happens as soon as we enter a third party item is entered in to the sales order. Now my question is whether the purchase requisition goes to the MM department or not. Please help me.
Thank you.Hi,
Welocme to the SDN.Forum,
w.r.t to your thread, I donu2019t know what settings you have done. If you want to stop creation of PR generation while saving sales order in third party, you should have maintained u201Crequirement =102 in the Routine No. column in u201COVB8u201D. To confirm please check in u201Cschedule linesu201D of sales order.
To my knowledge, the Credit block / delivery block in a sales order does not prevent the generation of the purchase requisition in a third-party or individual purchase order item. Regardless of the Customizing settings in the delivery block, the system confirms the TAB or TAS item and generates the purchase requisition.
Regards
DSR
Edited by: D.Srinivasa Rao on Nov 22, 2011 6:15 AM -
Third party order blocked for credit
while creation of a 3rd party order, at the time of saving it is deleting the created purchase requisition and the document is by default is going to credit block, but the credit limit of the customer is not crossed. he used only 0.05% of his credit limit.
Hi Kingfire,
System will automatically delete purchase requisition if order is on credit block. For order to be on credit block there could be multiple reasons. Risk category - Document limits are couple of them.
If you release document in VKM3 and run availability it should create PR automatically. If it putting on credit block again which doing Avail. Check.its loop. Check OSS notes or Contact SAP.
Regards
Gopal -
Third Party Sales Order not generating a PR when going on Credit Block
Hello Generous People,
We are having a problem with creating 3rd Party Sales Orders and generating a PR when the customer goes on a credit block and the is subsequently released from there credit block. The system enters a loop of creating a PR and then deleting it once the sales order saved and then place the sales order back on credit block. The Credit Management system has been setup to cause a block for certain fields.
We have looked at the OSS Notes that are recommended by SAP, for example 100861, 396791, etc. However we are implementing SAP ECC 6.0 with all the latest updates. I was looking at OVB5 and VOFM, but I have had no luck with these as well.
Thank you in advance for your help or advice.Hi Jurijs,
Have you checked LVKMPFZ1, LVKMPFZ2 & LVKMPFZ3 to find out if there is any code for credit checks and blocks in these user exits. Also please check FORM USEREXIT_AVAIL_CHECK_CREDIT under include MV45AFZF to find out if there is any code which is entered to not allow the availability check for blocked sales orders and therefore stopping the transfer of requirements inthe form of PR generation.
Don't worry about going into ECC 6.0. Once you will start the upgrade process on ECC 6.0, you will come to know a set of transaction codes which you can run into the system to find out the non standard ABAP code changes which exists in your SAP landscape. -
Third party credit update with goods receipt
Hi Experts,
I need to know how customize the credit control management in the following situation:
In third party flow without SD delivery: Sales Order -> Purchase requisition -> Purchase
Order ->Goods Receips from supplier.
The credit control has to be done with the delivered amount not
invoiced. But in this flow the SD delivery is substitue by MM Goods
Receipt in order to deliver products to the customers. When goods
receipt is done the delivered credit amount isn't updated.
it's necessary to check the amount delivered not the amount ordered (as it's done with the current customization)
The customizing is:
the item category:
billing relevance 'B': Relevant for order-related billing - status
acc.to order qty
o Copying control -> invoiced quantity indicator 'E': Goods receipt
quantity less invoiced quantity
Schedule type: u2018CSu2019
Credit control area update group: 00012
Automatic control check : 'D', flag in open deliveries.
We have checked note 410685 but not solution has been found.
Example: Customer has a credit limit 1000 euros.
1) Create a sales order with an total amount 900 euros.
2) Create purchase order with the purchase requisition created
automatically by the sales order and release it.
3) Do goods receipt for an total amount 800.
4) Create another sales order with a total amount 150 euros.
Now, the new sales order is blocked, because the calculated credit is
100 (credit limit - ordered amount). If the credit is calculated with
the delivered quantity, the credit will be 200 and the new sales order
won't be blocked.
Thanks in advance,
LauraHi Nagesh,
In any credit memo scenario, always enable the creation of Credit Memo Request and then Credit memo. When the credit memo request is to be created, make sure that it is always created with reference to the invoice document only and not reference to the sales order, as the objective of Credit memo is to correct the prices in the invoice document. This will help you in various scenarios like exchange rate where the value of sales order and the value of invoice can be different in the local currency due to ex.rate fluctuations.
As credit memo takes care of incorrect prices, having a document flow of credit memo request with reference to sales order is incorrect.
With reference to the error message, it is a valid message as an invoice has been created with reference to the order. You should not create a credit memo with reference to a sales order(OR), for credit memo, u shd use a credit memo request only as the reference.
Hence the flow for your question is
Sales order>Invoice>Credit Memo req-->Credit Memo
OR>F2>G2W(Confirm with others on the doc type)-->G2S
Pls lemme know if you need further clarifications in this topic.
Maybe you are looking for
-
My missus dragged me into an Apple Store yesterday, she is itching to get an iPad2, the rest of the store was full of Mac computers, they are so LOVELY and so easy to use, beautifull in every way, so for £1500 + i can get a MacBookPro, but how much o
-
I got a new Samsung galaxy notepad for Christmas .I chose it because I have and Android Galaxy phone .I also have an Ipod that I use at work to listen to music. Can I transfer my music library from my PC Itunes to be able to listen to the music on my
-
Inserting image in a table using php +zend
Hy! The table is (products(picture_p blob,prod_id number)) when i try to insert the pictureusing a similar code with this from oracle .com: // Insert the BLOB from PHP's tempory upload area $lob = oci_new_descriptor($conn, OCI_D_LOB); $stmt = oci_par
-
Why does Find not see a visible file at Volume level?
I recently searched (Find) my iMac's internal hard drive for a file that I knew I had created ("MAC addresses.doc"), but it found no such file, either by File Name or Contents. I had to try to remember where I filed it, and then I found it in [Macint
-
File sender adapter: archiving not possible with transp.prot "filesystem,
Hi XI gurus, in my FILE sender adapter I want to archive the processed files to a separate sub-directory of the "in" directory. It works if I use transport protocoll "FTP" with a specific user but it don't works when I use transport protocoll "file s