Credit for Returns showing different Net values...

Hi,
I used VF03 to see a billing document, it was a Credit for Returns and it had one line item. It showed the Net value as say 25000.00. I clicked that line item and then clicked the icon at the bottom "Item Pricing Condtn" and in the next screen under the "Conditions tab" , the net value shown is like 15676.00.
Why is the Net Value different from what was shown in the first screen ? What may be happening ? Any tips ?
And also the net value in the first screen then changes when you move back to the first screen !!
So everytime when you open the document  in VF03 it shows 25000.00 and then when u return to that screen (after above mentioned steps) it shows the new value 15676.00.
thnks
Edited by: sdnuser1 sdnsurname on Sep 17, 2010 9:09 PM

Hi SDNuser,
Check if any routine is written for calculation of any condition type in pricing unde requirements, Altcalctype or Altcalcbaseval.
Also check if some logic has been implemented in User exit RV60AFZZ, for billing document pricing under forms:
      USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMK     
      USEREXIT_PRICING_PREPARE_TKOMP                 
Regards

Similar Messages

  • FD33 Open sales value against credit for return

    Dear Gurus,
    In a particular situation, we had to cancel the sale of a customer for an entire month. Among list of all invoices, we had few cases where returns/PGRs were done and Credit For Returns were issued. All invoices without returns were easily cancelled and sales were reversed.
    However, FD33 still shows Open Sales Value (with such open sales order against which returns were punched). Here, An attempt was made to cancel 'Credit for return' but its PGR was not allowed to be reversed because the stock was not there or reprocessed for any reason. Similar behavior was there for all such few returns.
    Now, in order to raise a single order, we need to clear this open sales value.
    Have your suggestions here please.
    Regards.

    Hi
    However, FD33 still shows Open Sales Value (with such open sales order against which returns were punched).
    For those orders against which returns were processed you are seeing open sales value. Right? Why those orders are open? If sale return as been processed then their status should be closed and if they are not required to process in future then reject them. If sale orders are open then there value would be there in FD33.
    Moreover how did you know that this value is against those sale orders? Have you verified it with orders or is it just your idea? What is the value of this open sale order in FD33? Try to match it woth orders and identify which orders are causing this open sale order value.
    Thank$

  • VPRS cost copying different in Returns order and Credit for returns

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    we created returns order, returns delivery and Credit for Returns.But the VPRS cost copying in Credit for Returns different than Returns order.I have tested in DEV its working fine but in PRD its taking different. I compared copy contrls,condition settings and pricing procedure i didnt found any difference. where i need to check other than these areas.
    Regards,
    Nooka

    Hi,
    If if works in DEV then there is no problem with configuration.(Compare configuration of DEV with PRD).
    Please check that all change request are moved correctly or not,speciallty related to your scenario.
    Any enhancement  change request are moved or not.(Because DEV and PRD are different clients. Some requests are client specific.)
    Thanks,
    Vrajesh
    Edited by: Vrajesh G. Nayak on Jan 20, 2010 5:23 AM

  • Approval required for raising credit memo request and credit for returns.

    hi experts,
    In Standard SAP, credit memo request has a credit billing block. It has to be released by an authorised person. But for my client
    it has to be approved by 4 persons. In case of returns, Credit for returns also needs to be approved by 4 persons.
    Client wants Yes or No  pop-up screen
    The chart Showing Approval for Credit Memo from four users, if all four users approve u201CYesu201D Credit Memo can be issued. And it cannot be issued if any of the four users doesnu2019t approve for credit memo.
           Credit Memo request
    approval by USER1
    approval by USER2
    approval by USER3
    approval by USER4
    Credit Memo
    Any idea or suggestion doing this please share...
    your reply will be appreciated with points.
    Thanks and regards,
    -Jay

    Hi,
    In our project,we have a similar requirement.
    For this,we have developed a "Z" table which has the fields as "Credit control area",Customer credit group from,customer credit group to,Refund value from,refund value to,Approval Levels(values like Cash colletion credit manager,Senior order sales manager etc....These values were maintained in Domain),First Approver,Additional Approver,Additional Approver and e-mail address for rejections.
    The values for First,additional approvers will be fileld with position numbers which were created by HR team.
    Based on the Sales value,a work item will be created in approver's mail box i.e. in SBWP T.Code.If no action has been taken,then an escalation is going to send to managers of these three approvers.This Heirarchy will be mainatined in HR module.
    Please check with your ABAPer for developing this logic.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • Credit note, credit memo and credit for returns

    All,
    Can anyone explain to me the difference of the followong scenarios?
    -Credit note
    -Credit memo
    -Credit for return
    tia - Pablito

    credit note and credit memo are same i.e when u pass the credit to the customer because of the excess amount u taken for example the high priced invoice, to balance it u create this type of document.
    credit for returns is exclusively when you take back ur damaged goods for example u return the value of the goods to customer thru this type of document.
    reward if helpful.
    regards,
    seshu.

  • Return request / Credit for Returns & Internal Credit memo

    Hi Gurus,
    We managed a complete flow for return request with delivery.
    The good issue is not done.
    Even if the GI is not complete, I can create a Credit for Returns (RE).
    But when I create the Internal Credit for Returns (IG), SAP displays error message "Goods issue has not been posted for the delivery".
    Behavior is different according to the billing document type.
    Thanks.
    Stéphane

    Hello,
    The process of billing in case of return is perfect example of Copying control setting.
    Credit for Returns (RE)             -->  As you are able to bill the Return after creating the delivery and without doing PGI, it is a order related billing.
    Internal Credit for Returns (IG)  --> Check whether for this document, it is order related billing or delivery relayed billing. If order related billing then there must be "Copying requirements" and this has been set in such a way that PGI has to be done first and then we can do the Billing.
    Regards,
    Sarthak

  • What formula do I use to show the net value (less 23% tax).

    In Numbers, what formula do I use to show the net value (i.e. less 23% tax).

    thejuddo writes:
    "$100 plus sales tax of 23% would be $123.00 but in order to get the net value of $123.00 less the tax I would have to divide by 1.23 not multiply by 23% and then minus it."
    Correct;
    The 23% tax is 23 one hundredths of the base amount, and is applied to that amount. As a formula, this can be stated as:
    =B2+B2*C2
    or
    =B2*(1+C2)
    (either applying to the data arrangement shown in the top table, and entered in  D2 of that table)
    In the other direction, though (bottom table), we start with the Gross amount and the Tax rate as known quantities, from which we are to determine the base amount, remembering that the 23% Tax rate is 23% of the Base amount, not 23% of the Gross amount.
    Rewriting the two formulas above as equations, with g, b, and t as the variables, we get:
    g = b + (b * t) 
    g = b(1+t)
    Solving the second for b:
    b - g/(1+t)
    Expressed as a formula (with the data as arranged in the bottom table, and the formula in D2):
    D2: =B2/(1+C2)
    In both directions, it may be prudent to round the result to the nearer hundredth, as done here for the calculation immediately above:
    =ROUND(B2/(1+C2),2)
    Regards,
    Barry

  • Credit for returns and Memo

    Hello every one,
    For a return order, there is a credit for returns and a credit memo was invoiced with a zero amount value, how is it possible…what could be the issue? I have checked the copy controls from re<re, the pricing is maintained as customer reserve and billing quantity as “A” -order related.
    Please comment!
    Thanks

    Check if some one re-priced the order and original pricing condition have been modified.
    Thanks
    Ramesh

  • Credit for returns

    Hi Experts,
    We have created a delivery no. for employee returns. A billing doc was created ( credit for returns ) in VF01 for this delivery.
    After 2 months, another billing doc was created for this delivery no. When we check the status of delivery no. it's 'being processed'.  Is this the reason why we were able to create several billing docs for one delivery no. only? Kindly advise also why is it that the status of delivery no. is still open for processing. I thought that once a billing doc is created the delivery no will be completed.
    Thanks,
    Ellicec

    Dear Ellicec
    The Delivery doc. wil remain open till it is completely BILL.  Multiple billing is very much possible out of one billing  Doc. no., it depends upon your configuration.    At ITEM  category - Billing relevance     and      in copy Control  i.e. VTFL  in item level   in     VBRK/ VBRP field. 
    Apart from that YOU can also search SAP Notes on Billing Split
    Thanks
    Ashok

  • Return sales aftr credit for returns inv........

    Hi !!!
       Can any body suggest me in return sales proces after ret delv and credit for returns  invoice
    wht will be the further flow excise invoice in this scenario as , it mean how can i update the previous (in normal sale ex  inv to this return process) excise inv.
    Regards,
    Balu

    > Hi !!!
    >    Can any body suggest me in return sales proces after ret delv and credit for returns  invoice
    > wht will be the further flow excise invoice in this scenario as , it mean how can i update the previous (in normal sale ex  inv to this return process) excise inv.
    Normal sale Process
    a) Sale Order
    b) Delivery
    c) Picking (if necessary)
    d) Commercial Invoice
    e) Excise Invoice
    Returns
    a) Create return order with reference to commercial inv
    b) Create return delivery Movement type you can use 651 or 655
    c) Generate Credit note
    d) Do excise adjustments in J1IH
    PLease awd points if resolved

  • Print Credit for returns Document through My report

    Hi,
    I have a credit note / debit note print zreport. This report is picking data from BKPF, BSEG tables. Also report are using logical data
    DD - Customer Debit Note number like 500368 and DG - Customer Credit Note Number like 100506, that is printing through my report.
    But user wants data for Credit for returns - RE & Warranty credit note - ZWCN, which is coming from VBRK table. Document number is like 90010446.
    How can i print these number's through my report.
    Note: - Logical Database Name : - BRF.. because it is standard, then how can i change in it.
    Regards
    Edited by: @ABAP@ on Jan 30, 2010 5:59 PM

    Chained question series are not allowed.
    Thread locked.

  • No Incompletion Log for Sales Order with net value as zero

    Hi all,
    There is an Inbound IDOC which creates a Sales Order.
    When we check the IDOC, we find that it has got 4 line items (E1EDP01). However, for all the items except the third one (for example), the segment E1EDP05 is filled. In the segment E1EDP05 the field KRATE contains the corresponding net value for the respective line items.
    Then when we check Sales Order which is created, we find that the third line item (for example) has the net value as zero. In this case, ideally there should have been an entry in the Incompletion Log. However, it does not happen so.
    I suppose the issue is with the third line item in the IDOC for which the segment E1EDP05 is not present. I have debugged the corresponding FM is IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS, but was unable to find any clue.
    Please let me know the reason for this.
    Thanks and regards,
    Anishur

    In routine interpret_idoc_orders the item conditions are filled by calling
    WHEN 'E1EDP05'.
           MOVE IDOC_DATA-SDATA TO E1EDP05.
           PERFORM ZUORDNEN_ORDERS_E1EDP05.
    In case KRATE is empty no values are transferred to the order
        IF NOT E1EDP05-KRATE IS INITIAL.
          PERFORM IDOC_CUR_MOVE USING E1EDP05-KRATE XKOMV-CURRDEC
                                      XKOMV-KOEIN
                                      XKOMV-KBETR D_FLAG_P-PKON.
        ENDIF.
    If that is a valid scenario, you need to adjust your incompletion procedure in customizing to include the net value on item level so any missing value is reported.
    If this is not supposed to happen you might want to hook into one of the user exits in the idoc and in case KRATE is missing let the idoc fail.
    Hope that helps,
    Michael

  • Sales Reports showing Different Net Sales

    Hi All,
    Here is three queries, which are sowing different net sales. But both should return same values. Please correct me.
    select sum( nvl(c.extended_amount,0) * nvl(b.exchange_rate,1)) SALES
    from ra_salesreps a
    ,ra_customer_trx_all b
    ,ra_customer_trx_lines c
    where a.salesrep_id(+) = b.primary_salesrep_id
    and b.customer_trx_id(+) = c.customer_trx_id
    and c.line_type='LINE'
    AND b.complete_flag like 'Y'
    and (b.trx_date between TO_DATE('2010/12/01 00:00:00', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
    and TO_DATE('2011/11/30 23:59:59', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss') )
    AND b.primary_salesrep_id = 1040;
    SELECT SUM(nvl(c.extended_amount,0)*nvl(b.exchange_rate,1 )) net_amount,
    FROM hz_cust_accounts hca,
    hz_parties hp,
    ra_customer_trx_all b,
    ra_customer_trx_lines_all c,
    ra_cust_trx_types_all d
    WHERE b.bill_to_customer_id = hca.cust_account_id
    AND b.customer_trx_id = c.customer_trx_id
    AND b.cust_trx_type_id = d.cust_trx_type_id
    AND hca.party_id = hp.party_id (+)
    AND c.line_type='LINE'
    AND b.invoice_currency_code like 'USD'
    AND hca.primary_salesrep_id = 1040
    AND b.trx_date BETWEEN to_date('2010/12/01 00:00:00', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
    AND to_date('2011/11/30 23:59:59', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
    HAVING SUM(DECODE(d.TYPE, 'INV', (nvl(c.extended_amount,0)*nvl(b.exchange_rate,1)), 'DM', (nvl(c.extended_amount,0)*nvl(b.exchange_rate,1)),0 )) BETWEEN TO_NUMBER(-999999999) and TO_NUMBER(999999999);
    SELECT
    SUM(nvl(y.extended_amount,0)*nvl(x.exchange_rate,1 )) net_amount
    FROM hz_cust_accounts hca,
    hz_parties hp,
    hz_party_sites hps,
    hz_cust_acct_sites hcas,
    hz_cust_site_uses_all hcsu,
    hz_locations hl,
    ra_customer_trx_all x,
    ra_customer_trx_lines_all y,
    ra_cust_trx_types_all z
    WHERE hca.party_id = hp.party_id
    AND hp.party_id = hps.party_id
    AND hcas.party_site_id = hps.party_site_id (+)
    AND hps.location_id = hl.location_id (+)
    AND x.bill_to_customer_id = hca.cust_account_id(+)
    AND hcas.cust_account_id = x.bill_to_customer_id
    AND x.customer_trx_id = y.customer_trx_id
    AND x.cust_trx_type_id = z.cust_trx_type_id
    AND x.ship_to_site_use_id = hcsu.site_use_id(+)
    AND hcas.cust_acct_site_id(+) = hcsu.cust_acct_site_id
    AND x.invoice_currency_code like 'USD'
    AND y.line_type='LINE'
    AND x.trx_date BETWEEN TO_DATE('2010/12/01 00:00:00', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
    AND TO_DATE('2011/11/30 23:59:59', 'yyyy/mm/dd hh24:mi:ss')
    AND hca.primary_salesrep_id = 1040;
    Thanks & Regards,

    Hello,
    The answer from Caveman is correct, the DRB - tcode ALO1 (that is the letter o not a zero) retains some of the document flow of archived data.
    Do not use transaction VPAR as that archives data related to preference determination and transaction VF07 does not show document flow.
    If you have implemented the PBS modules to view archived data, they retain the document flow information and you can view the data exactlly how it looked before it was archived.
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Karin Tillotson

  • Credit memo request with zero net value

    Hello all,
    when we create a credit memo request (VA01, doc type CR) and put a material quantity into the credit memo request that falls below the scale in VK13, the net value for the material will be zero.
    We do not want to allow to save the credit memo request with a zero net value, but SAP will just allow us do that.
    I was wondering if there is a way to pop up a warning or even an error message that avoids saving the document in case of a zero net value?
    Thanks
    Anne

    Hi,
    You can make the condition type (for which $0.00 is not allowed) as mandatory condition type in the pricing procedure. By this way the system will give error and wont allow to proceed any further unless the data is complete. (make sure this is not affecting your regular sales order cycle).
    Or if you just want to give a pop-up message then you can use user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV45AFZZ
    Regards,

  • Hi regarding Credit for returns

    HI Gurus
    I have finished the entire process of Retruns,i got the return for credit document number
    after that what is the procedure if we give this to customer
    then next time he is buying from company what is the procedure and how we will adjust the amount
    where we will do that in F-32 , F-28 or va01 where to do that
    Thanks in advance
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    When you have issued a Credit note, it will show customer credit in FBL5N. You have to clear the customer line (Orginal Invoice debit to customer) with this credit note in F-32.
    If you have already received the payment, then you adjust the credit for future  supplies, which is normal procedure.
    Thanks & regards,
    R.Janakiraman

Maybe you are looking for