Credit Over Exposure

Dear Experts,
I am facing a piculair situation in Credit Control for Customer. The Credit has been set to INR 150000 for the customer, it is showing a credit over shoot of by 110 % becuase now the invoices are due for 315000. How come this has happneded? ? I see an amount In with Cash discount, if I consider that the open invoices are down below INR 150000. Where can I check this cash discount because I do not see the same in open item for customer?
What other scenarios are possible causing the over shoot of credit limit?
Best Regards
Vk

Hi Vivek,
Credit check has been set at Sales order and delivery. There is no question of billing but surprisingly it has also ignored credit check at Sales order and Delivery time.
This is what user did.
The original outstanding balance on the account (as of 12/1/09) was
$129,654 (Invoice 92487883). 2 delivery notes were created for
$147,091.20 (resulting in billing document 92490272 $77,792.40 and
92490273 $69,148.80) which caused the credit limit of $150,000 to be
exceeded. In order to allow a shipment and to override the credit
limit, the user specifically created a flooring authorization for order
30928201 line 10. This caused a delivery to be created and a
subsequent billing 92493972 for $77,792.40. The last item was an
override and we know why this delivery was created. The other 2 items
billing documents 92490272 and 92490273 should not have been created.
Regards
VK

Similar Messages

  • Does any1 hav issues with not being able to send pic from the camera roll. I've already had issues with over exposure that the new update fixed but it left me with this issue.

    Since getting my iPhone 5 I've had camera issues. To start with it was over exposure, the camera was flashing too early and leaving me with dark pictures. After a failed reset I visited the apple store, where they told me it was a known problem and apple were working on a update to fix the issue and it was just a
    waiting game. Once the update was available I did it immediately and the problem seemed to be fixed. I've now noticed that from the camera roll I carnt send a picture to mms. It gives me the option but the screen completely freezes after I've chosen it. The only way to access my camera roll again is to completely close the camera roll down and reopen it. The strange thing it it will let me send it as an email and upload taught to Facebook etc just not as an mms. The other strange thing is if I go to msgs and add a photo I'm successful but if I try to edit the photo I want to send 1st then I get the same issue as the camera roll. I also have issues with the shutter taking ages to open. Is anyone else havin these issue before I go back to the apple shop. A complete reset hasn't worked

    Photo Stream only handles images and your videos are not uploaded or shared with other devices.
    Use iPhoto to import from your device. It can bring in the videos and image files.

  • Over exposure downloading from Nikon D300 to lightroom 2.3

    Following upgrade to Lightroom 2.3 when images are downloaded from my Nikon D300 (raw or jpeg) they are all overexposed after quickly appearing in preview.  How do I correct this.  Is this a camera or software problem
    David Neal

    I had the same problem with a D700.
    Applying the Standard profile will correct the colors but not exposure.
    Another thing to check is that you have not unable Advanced D-Light on your camera. Automode is the worst case because you don't even know how much over exposure is set!
    This camera option is a tricky one: it overexpose your photo and make a built in camera process to recover details in the over/under exposed zones.
    LR is not able to read this information (proprietary info in the NEF raw file) so the photo is over-exposed.
    One way is to use the exposure LR cursor (-0.25 can simulate a light ADL..) but you will never have the same photo because Nikon processing is different and specific for each over/under exposed zones: sometime using the LR exposure brush is necessary on this zones (darken a sky for example).
    Antoher thing is to desactive the Nikon ADL. You will then have nearly the same picture between LR Raw and your embedded Jpeg, you only need to  apply the Standard or Neutral LR profil to correct the colors.
    Then, if you want to recover some details in the over/under exposed zones, you  can add a LR exposure brush on these zones. The good thing is that you control manually what Nikon ADL do automatically...

  • Nikon D700 Over exposure issue

    After shooting some outdoor shots last week, I found most all of the shots as about 1/3 to a full stop over exposed on my Nikon D700.  I did some research and everyone seems to point to the camera.  As a fairly recent LR convert, I went back to Nikon Capture NX2 to see if I found the same over exposure, and DID NOT.  I hate to jump to conclusions, but it seems like LR is having problems compared to Capture.
    I am interested if anyone else has done the same test and found the same results.  I LOVE LR and used it a lot recently for concert performance work as well as portrait work, but these bright sunlight shots just seemed too much for LR. 
    Thanks! 

    I suspect your problem is due to tone curve mismatches. Let's say you are shooting some people shots and in-camera you are using the Portrait picture control.
    1) When you review your photo in the LCD and look at the histogram, the JPG (yes, even if you shot RAW) displayed there uses the tone curve (and other settings, like sharpening, hue, saturation, etc.) in that Picture Control. Add White Balance (WB) into that mix.
    2) Similarly, when you review your RAW file in either ViewNX2 or Capture NX2, the software reads the raw data *and* the Picture Control and WB information to render the image and corresponding histogram you see in the application.
    Now, if you move over to Lightroom, the Adobe default camera profile will likely (most assuredly, actually) use a different tone curve and color profile. The result? A different histogram that will show either over or under-exposure when compared to what you saw in-camera or in the NX2 software, depending on the particular mismatch.
    The solution? Either use one of the provided Nikon-like profiles (for instance, my LR 3.4 has Portrait), or create your own to match the Nikon's built-in (or even if you had it, your custom) Picture Control. Keep an eye on White Balance, too, as the incorrect WB can push or pull your histogram. For instance, an overly warm WB can clip your reds, when a corrected WB wouldn't.
    After years using ViewNX2, exclusively (plus PSP X2 for final editing), I've just (this weekend!) switched to a LR3-CS5 workflow. Part of what kept me away from Adobe products for so long was the reluctance to give up Nikon software's "full insight" into the in-camera settings. In the end, I decided that this histogram I see in my camera is ficticious, anyway, a by-product of one possible interpretation of the RAW data. Perhaps Nikon is better qualified to interpret that RAW data, but based on the quality and robustness of their software, who knows?
    Anyway, long story short: match your tone curve and WB, and you should get similar results. My early experimentation with D700 and D7000 photos this weekend, when I did a couple of quick cross-checks of what ViewNX2 gave me vs. LR3 with the Portrait control/profile indicates my results are reasonably close. As with all things, YMMV.

  • FX Factory filters over exposure on FCP

    Friends
    I'm having problems using FX Factory's plugins with FCP... When I applied filters as Core Glow, the image is over exposuring (the white becomes too white, the black is not so black...).
    I believe that it is some configuration on my FCP, because the over exposure only happens when I apply the filters using the FCP installed on my iMAC... When I use the FX Factory's filters with the FCP installed on my MacBook Pro, it does not happen.
    An example, if I apply the filter on my Mac Book Pro, render it, and I open the project on my iMac it looks perfect... But if I have to render it again using the iMac, the same project, no changes on the settings, the image becomes over exposure, too bright.
    By the way, both Macs has FCP 6.0.4 and FX Factorys 2.0.2 installed.
    Could someone help me?
    Thanks a lot.

    look in your audio video settings, sequence settings,video processing to see if you are processing white as white or super white on each machine

  • Correcting Over-Exposure

    I have some footage which shows mild to moderate over-exposure. What is the best way to correct for this? Is there an effect which acts as a type of limiter, keeping luminance values below a user-defined threshold?
    Thanks.

    The problem is, given the limited luminance space in video, once you get to white it just fills everything with the same colour because that's the ceiling. Everything that would be brighter just gets clamped to white. This means you lose the fine detail that you would otherwise get if you just wound the iris down in the camera during shooting. Because that space is all the same colour/brightness when you change the levels of the white it just drags the whole slab of white down to grey rather than reintroduce the fine detail. All you can do, as Harm has said, is to take the edge off the highlights so it's not quite so harsh.
    Good luck. Let us know how you go.

  • Credit Check- exposure calculation comprehensive of Vendor Items

    Dear Gurus,
    my question is: how is possible to comprehend in the Customer Exposure's calculation, also Vendor items, if the Customer is also a Vendor.
    An example
    Customer  code: 12345; in master data has the vendor code:  00001
    Vendor code 00001; in master data has the customer code: 12345
    Customer 12345 exposure: 50.000 dollars
    Vendor 00001 open items: 5.0000 dollars
    In FD32 i would like to see as accounting exposure the difference between 50.000-5.000= 45.000
    Is it possible?
    Thank you in advance.
    Sonia.

    Hi,
    I was not able to find a user exit for credit exposure determination but you can follow this. You need help from FI guys. Now since: Credit exposure = open ordersopen deliveriesopen billingtotal receivablesspecial liabilities.
    Now ask FI guys to calulate total receivables for this customer and subtract vendor open items and update the KNKK-SKFOR or KNKK-SSOBL field. So either you can create a custom program to do this or a user exit within FI.
    Once that is done. credit exposure should be what you wanted to set.
    Thanks
    Robin

  • SX10 IS zoom photos are all white (severe over exposure?)

    Hi, I've notice that when I take outdoor pictures, mostly in "Auto" mode, using a fair amount of zoom that the image take is mostly white.  This consistently occurs and is not a one-time event.  I'm assuming that the images are severely over exposed. The environment is typically mid-day sunlight. Taking a picture of the same composition at much lower magnification gives expected results.  I've been through the manual looking for different things to adjust without success.  I've reset all settings to their defaults and the problem persists.  I've tried different modes with similar results.  I've had this camera for a few years now and I haven't experienced this problem before.  Any ideas or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

    JakeInTexas,
    When shooting outdoors in sunlight, the camera could be metering the exposure improperly because of the sunlight entering the lens at certain angles.  A good way to counter this is by attaching the lens hood that came with the camera.
    If this does not help, I would like to take a look at a sample image if you could upload one to this thread.  It will greatly help us determine what else may be causing this.
    If this is a time sensitive-matter, additional support options are available at Contact Us.
    Did this answer your question? Please click the Accept as Solution button so that others may find the answer as well.

  • Sales Order Line Items User Exit - Credit Management/ Exposure Calculation

    Hello Folks
    I am looking for a solution to a peculiar problem we have in credit management.
    In case of Drop Ship sales order life cycle, the system automatically creates two line items per sales order - one each for Freight and Handling Fees. these are NOT relevant to schedule line delivery, nor are they billed to the customer along with the material billing. The default update rule for credit control area concerned is 12. The system, on finding line items not relevant to schedule line delivery automatically switches from rule 12 to 18. This leads to Open Deliveries field (S067-OLIWW) being updated instead of Open Orders (S066-OEIKW) on saving the sales order.
    Once the sales order is billed for the material, the system should logically display net value as zero for the open order (as the 2 lines of fees and freight are not yet billed, the order is still open). But the system considers this figure at SALES DOCUMENT HEADER level and considers the net value as the total value of the sales document (including the material that is already billed).
    What I am looking for is if there is an exit available whereby the system considers only those line items whose billing status indicator is "not complete". As such, the net value should be updated to the S067-OLIKW field net of the billed items.
    Please advise if there is any such user exit available. Also, is there a way to customize this? We are exploring this at our end, but would appreciate an expert advise. Right advise will be awarded with brownie points
    Regards
    Mandar Barve

    VKM1 uses FM SD_ORDER_CREDIT_RELEASE to release orders on credit.

  • CREDIT MANAGEMENT - EXPOSURE CALCULATION USER EXIT

    Hello Folks
    I am looking for a solution to a peculiar problem we have in credit management.
    In case of Drop Ship sales order life cycle, the system automatically creates two line items per sales order - one each for Freight and Handling Fees. these are NOT relevant to schedule line delivery, nor are they billed to the customer along with the material billing. The default update rule for credit control area concerned is 12. The system, on finding line items not relevant to schedule line delivery automatically switches from rule 12 to 18. This leads to Open Deliveries field (S067-OLIWW) being updated instead of Open Orders (S066-OEIKW) on saving the sales order.
    Once the sales order is billed for the material, the system should logically display net value as zero for the open order (as the 2 lines of fees and freight are not yet billed, the order is still open). But the system considers this figure at SALES DOCUMENT HEADER level and considers the net value as the total value of the sales document (including the material that is already billed).
    What I am looking for is if there is an exit available whereby the system considers only those line items whose billing status indicator is "not complete". As such, the net value should be updated to the S067-OLIKW field net of the billed items.
    Please advise if there is any such user exit available. Also, is there a way to customize this? We are exploring this at our end, but would appreciate an expert advise. Right advise will be awarded with brownie points
    Regards
    Mandar Barve

    Hi,
    Actually I have got some User exits for credit checks...
    LVKMPTZZ
    LVKMPFZ1: USER_CREDIT_CHECK1
    LVKMPFZ2: USER_CREDIT_CHECK2
    LVKMPFZ3: USER_CREDIT_CHECK3
    And trying with that also but looking for any other solution if it is available..
    And using another Sales Document Type is not possible in this case..
    Any inputs...?? anybody???
    Thanks..
    HP

  • Strange over exposure

    Can anyone help with this problem because I'm really stumped!
    I'm using Lightroom 5.7 on a Windows 7 laptop & not had any problems up until now but images in Develop mode show large red areas as though they are over exposed (see screen shot). The same photos have previously been fine up until now & are fine in Library mode & if viewed in any other programme. I have tried uninstalling & reinstall but this has made no difference. Any advice would be helpful, thanks.

    Look in the top right corner of the histogram, there is a highlighted triangle which means you have selected the highlights indicator, the red areas are blown highlights. Click will turn off.

  • How to create the Over exposure wipe effect?

    Films like The Secret produce a wipe effect of over exposed light emiting from the video as it transitions to the next shot. Any idea how to creat this effect?
    Thx
    Kevin

    It can definitely play a factor. DVD has a little more leeway, and I've never seen an issue on my TV, but it's properly set up. For the typical viewer who probably has their brightness turned way up so they can watch TV in the afternoon with the sun shining right on the screen, the transitions will probably tear and distort.
    I love the vapor across transition, but only use it for web based projects, and things I know that only I am going to be watching.

  • N95 8GB Camera Over-Exposure

    Ok, so I've had my N95 a while now and I cannot take pictures with it, due to the fact that it over exposes every single picture I take. I've tried changing every setting on it and it stil won't change.
    An example is attached.
    And this happens on pretty much every picture I take, to varying degrees.
    ANy help?
    http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g297/allen114/24072008107.jpg

    Good luck!
    If it's still that bad after the update then it's most likely a fault. Take it to a nokia care point for inspection.
    Care points/service centres and repair info:
    UK • Europe • Asia-Pacific • USA •
    Canada • Middle East and Africa
    Elsewhere: Click here, select your country, go to the support section, then select repair.

  • Credit Limit Check - Exclude Specific Documents / Credits from Exposure

    Hi,
    I would like to know if it's possible to exclude specific document types (credits) from the credit exposure calculation used during credit limit checks.
    The ideia is to exclude "DG" credits in customer GL that are related to Trade Deal/Agreements to avoid over-exposure.
    Let me explain:
    Currently, our credit management is configured to "Static" + "Open Items" for all credit groups in the CCA. Therefore, SAP calculates the credit exposure as:
              CE = OPEN ORDERS (S066) + OPEN DELIVERIES (S067) + OPEN BILLING (S067) + OPEN ITEMS (BSID)
    Regarding "Open Items", I understand that SAP calculates the net value between all debits (receivables) and credits (returns, overpayments, etc...) already posted and not cleared in the Customer GL account. This rationale is correct since the credits are due to the customers and should be deducted from their exposure (i.e. "you may not pay them if you don't receive").
    However, in our case, we also pay trade deals contracts (i.e. trade incentives and trade marketing investments) directly to costumers and apart from sales orders or credit memos. The flow is the following: (1) contracts are managed on a satelite system and interfaced to SAP; (2) contracts are created in the costumer GL as a credit (doc. type "DG"); (3) credits are sent to accounts payable for payment via F110.
    Problem is that, contract credits volume is significant and are impacting customers credit exposure and limit check, resulting in greater exposure than allowed. That is, orders are being released while contract credits are open in the customer GL up to the max exposure, but when contracts are paid the exposure goes above the limit. For example:
    Day 1:
              Costumer Credit Limit: 100
              Sales Balance: 30
              Open Itens: 50 (receivables: 70 / contracts: -20)
              Credit Exposure: 80/100
    Day 2:
              Costumer Credit Limit: 100
              Sales Balance: 50
              Open Itens: 50 (receivables: 70 / contracts: -20)
              Credit Exposure: 100/100 (no additional orders are released)
    Day 3:
              Costumer Credit Limit: 100
              Sales Balance: 50
              Open Itens: 70 (receivables: 70 / contracts: 0 - contracts are paid on day 3)
              Credit Exposure: 120/100 (exposure is above customer limit since contracts that were being deducted were paid)
    Any ideas or thoughts? Is something wrong in the explanation above? Should contracts credits be treated through special GL?
    Many thanks!

    Hello Julie,
    the 2nd, System behavior (how do you interact the credit limit check (yes/no question) via DI?)
    Workaround:
    Before you issue the Document, you may do a manual check: BP balance againt Credit Limit, and make deceision.
    Regards
    János

  • Credit Check Issue in R12.1.2

    Hi,
    I just want to have a test for the standard credit check process in EBS and then consider the customization to it. But I failed to finish the standard process test. Could you please help me to identify my issue?
    Below is the setup i did for the credit check:
    1. credit rule
    2. transaction type with the credit rule above associated
    3. payment term credit check box checked
    4. customer bill-to site , credit check check box checked and order limit, overall order limit are both set to 50 EUR
    after the setup I create a sales order using the customer and transaction type and payment term setup above, and the total amount for the order is over 10000EUR, but it successfully booked without any credit hold.
    I wonder is there anything I miss to setup?
    Best Regards
    Terrence

    Hello,
    1. Do you calculate exposure "online" or by request( pre-calculated in rule definition)?
    2. Look at      ORDER MANAGEMENT CREDIT CHECK / EXPOSURE SETUP [ID 444837.1] note from 11.5.10 but process is the same.
    3. It is hard to find what is wrong and I had solution:)      How to generate the Tax debug file for transactions in Sales Order form [ID 791080.1] After this you will know what standard pck you should customize( I had to exclude some translation types from AR during booking and this worked).
    Regards,
    Luko

Maybe you are looking for