Crisp / Clear Font Rendering?

Is there any suggestion on Arch Linux running Gnome 2.6.30 to improve the crisp / clearness of my fonts? I installed the latest available nVidia drivers & under 'Appearance' > 'Fonts' > 'Details', I show the following:
* Resolution: 98 dots per square inch.
* Smoothing: Subpixel (LCD)
* Hinting: Slight
* Subpixel Order: RGB
It just never seems as clear and crisp when I compare side by side to Ubuntu or Windows 7. The font clarity is notable difference beween Arch and I would like to change this. Any help and or tips would be greatly appreciated!
Screenshot
-Carlos
Last edited by Carlwill (2010-04-28 13:25:23)

Ubuntu uses special patches for their font rendering: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fon … d_packages
Windows uses Cleartype: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fon … e_packages

Similar Messages

  • CacheAsBitmap interfering with device font clear type rendering.

    I want to use device fonts in my application so the text appears clear on LCD displays and uses the system's clearType font rasterizing system.  It is characterized by slightly colored edges of text, as opposed to Flash's purely grayscale text rasterizer.  clearType is also what web browsers use, so it allows the text in Flash to exactly match that of the web browser.  Otherwise, Flash's text looks blurry when it uses it's own system with embedded fonts such as "anti-alias for readability", which is purely grayscale.
    I've noticed that when I'm using a scrollRect with cacheAsBitmp, my text is no longer clear and no longer uses the clearType system, despite having embedFonts set to off.  If I turn off cacheAsBitmap, then the text renders as expected.
    Is this alteration in font rendering technique by design?  I don't understand why cacheAsBitmp doesn't just render normally and cache the results.  The cached image will be aligned to whole pixels, and frankly, if it wasn't going to be and the colored edges wouldn't look right, then I wouldn't use clearType rendering, but it should be my decision.  cacheAsBitmap seems to exhibit this side effect of altering the font rendering technique, but I wasn't expecting it to have such an effect.

    And around we go
    I think you'll find cacheAsBitmap matches the antialias settings built into Flash. ClearType would require OS-level interaction to snap a bitmap capture of the text. Once you tick off that checkbox I'm "fairly sure" flash takes the outlines into its own hands, renders the text and captures the bitmap from its own internal drawing system.
    As you know, a bitmap is nothing like a vector. When you enable cAB you surrender the crisp vectors to the speed of a low DPI pixel representation to remove the expensive frame to frame calculations. There has to be some tradeoff and I'm not sure the current monochromatic replacement is any less clear than the interpolated, smoothed ClearType. If anything the monochromatic nature of the built in system adds weight to the characters whereas the summer bevel appearance of ClearType might smooth characters so thin they're hard to read.

  • Firefox/Thunderbird Font Rendering changed after upgrade of xulrunner

    Hi guys,
    I experienced a problem with font rendering in the mentioned applications after upgrading xulrunner from 1.9.2.10-1 to 1.9.2.10-2 today. It seems like font smoothing/subpixel rendering does not work as before. After downgrading to 1.9.2.10-1, it worked as expected again.
    To make it more clearly, here is a comparison shot of the two different renderings. The top one is before, the bottom one after the upgrade. You can see that the font at the top is rendered more smoothly.
    And here is a difference image:
    Is anything known about changes which could cause this?
    <edit>I have to correct this. The rendering in thunderbird was obviously not changed by the xulrunner upgrade, but by a separate thunderbird upgrade from 3.1.4-1 to 3.1.4-2.
    <edit2>Additional information: I have the cleartype versions of freetype2, cairo and libxft installed, if that matters.
    Last edited by Singul (2010-09-28 16:40:18)

    Although I am empathetic to the hard (and really great) job the arch devs do, I want to voice my overall agreement with softtower on this issue. Fonts have been an off and on problem for me with arch since the beginning. I understand the devs are doing the best they can, especially when the actual problem is with the moz. devs. But fonts are the major way most users interact with the system, and I can tell you that almost nothing is more aggravating, to me at least, to suddenly "upgrade" and get presented with those really crappy fonts out of the blue. Just saying I understand the frustration, and I think he makes some good points about shipping broken packages and "blaming" it on upstream. If they're broken - don't use them! if possible. "Progress" that breaks stuff isn't really progress, imo.
    hokasch wrote:
    Don't quite get what the fuzz is all about, my fonts look as crisp as ever (on a laptop lcd), the update changed absolutely nothing for me. I never used "fixed" versions of anything, can't really remember how I set up the fonts when I did this installation though (font config advice on the wiki I guess).
    It is not the repo's maintainers job to keep packages synced up with any "fixed" packages in AUR, that is your own responsibility, and bitching about it won't help you any.
    Just pointing out that comments like these aren't really helpful, imho. So you didn't have the problem - that's good to know, but the "fuzz" is about the fact that some of us *DO* have the problem.
    It typically doesn't show up on laptops, btw, only standalone LCDs for some reason (has always been the case for me, at least, with both LCDs and laptops, where the laptop never had the problem). So again, the fuss is that a major usability function got broken from an upgrade that shouldn't get broken, and imo it raises some good, if admittedly difficult to resolve, points, philosophical points, etc. about the packaging and upgrade process,

  • Font Rendering Got Bad After 32.0 Update

    After the recent update, the font started to get badly rendered. Kind of blurry with jagged edges and transparent parts. It used to be okay D:
    Sometimes it becomes okay for a moment as I scroll down on pages, and sometimes when I stop scrolling, the font stays as it is; as if there are specific positions for the text to render properly. However, not all of the fonts are affected. Only the ones inside the scroll area.
    On times that the font renders properly, the bookmarks font, title bar, and tab names are unaffected and still appear not-smooth. Same thing does not happen on other browsers. All my other system fonts look okay; it's really just Firefox.
    Restarting Firefox = didn't work
    Restarting Computer = didn't work
    Tried setting up Clear Type = didn't work
    Tried enabling and disabling Hardware Acceleration on Firefox = didn't work
    Tried enabling and disabling the Graphics card itself = didn't work
    Tried just about all of the suggestions I found on Google = none worked
    Tried complete uninstall and re-install of Firefox 32.0 = didn't work
    Graphics Driver are updated ~
    Windows is updated ~
    I'm using Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit
    Graphics AMD Radeon HD 6800
    I fixed it by downgrading to Firefox 31 which makes me sure that 32.0 is the culprit. As I was about to send the message on top; I tried downgrading as my last resort and it worked. Now I'm only sending this as a report. I am hoping you'll figure out what caused it because I am quite strict (OC) that everything in my PC must remain updated >_<; thus I want to use Firefox 32.0 as much as possible.

    No one to help on this ??????

  • Font rendering and legacy X applications

    For some time, I have had problems keeping older applications working well as the X font system evolves. For example, I have many drawings created in Xfig, and the fonts stopped being rendered correctly some time ago. Converting all these files for a new drawing package like Inkscape would be a pain. The other main problem occurs with a commercial CAD package (Eagle), which is statically linked to Qt2, and does not play nicely when anti-aliasing is applied to Qt3/KDE apps.
    Xfig and others
    The problem here is that Xfig would render fonts with the letters too closely spaced, such that the on-screen representation no longer matches the printed or PDF output. I fixed this by forcing 75 x 75 DPI resolution, rather than using the resolution determined by the X server from probing the monitor. To do this, put a line in the Monitor section of XF86Config or xorg.conf:
        DisplaySize 433 347
    The above x and y values were calculated for a resolution of 1280 x 1024.
    Another fix I have done for Xfig is to patch the sources to pick up the URW font names instead of the Adobe names for the standard Postscript fonts. If anyone is interested, I could make a proper Arch package for this.
    Forcing the resolution is admittedly a kludge. I might look into font rendering in an Xlib application, to see if there is some extra code needed to handle the proper resolution correctly.
    Gtk-2.0 UI fonts at 75DPI
    An unfortunate side effect of forcing 75 x 75 DPI resolution is that the menu and other UI fonts in Gtk apps end up too small. This was noticed on Gvim and Gnumeric. KDE and Qt programmes appear to be unaffected. This can be fixed by creating a .gtkrc-2.0 file in your home directory with the following contents:
        gtk-font-name = "Bitstream Vera Sans 12"
    Put whatever font and size you like. I have no information on the format of the gtkrc file. The above was adapted from a page found on Google.
    Mozilla (which uses Gtk) needs some individual tweaking, as the UI fonts end up far too big. In preferences->fonts, set the resoultion to 72 DPI.
    The above measures should only be required if you have forced 75DPI. I had no problems with Gtk apps prior to doing that.
    Eagle
    The problem with Eagle appears to be related to the fact that it uses Qt2 (statically linked) in a Qt3 environment. This might also occur with other apps, but Eagle is the only one I know about. When antialising is turned on via KDE control center, this modifies .qt/qtrc, and so affects all Qt applications. If I have anti-aliasing turned on, the fonts in Eagle are very ragged and badly spaced.
    I fixed this by modifying the font path in XF86Config, to remove the entry /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF. The problem appears to be that Eagle is picking up one of the True Type fonts, instead of a Type 1 or bitmapped font. Turning on antialing in Qt appears to alter its font selection behaviour (fontconfig?) as well as font rendering.
    An interesting outcome of experimenting with the font path is that removing entries only affects older applications. KDE and other modern apps work perfectly well with only the mandatory /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc entry present. As far as I know, this is because modern toolkits like Qt3 and Gtk2 use fontconfig to find fonts.

    I now made two screenshots of Mail: The first one while the external display was disconnected, the second one when it was connected (and Mail moved to the external display). I opened both screenshots in Photoshop and there was a clear difference between the font renderings: On the screenshot of the internal display, the fonts are smoothed with black and grey pixels only, while on the screenshot from the external display they are smoothed with colored pixels. This is the reason why the text looks so bad on the external one. Therefore, it is definitely a problem of the font rendering. In Photoshop, the difference of font rendering is clearly visible!
    See here:
    http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/5389/fontt.jpg
    The first line is internal display, the second line external display. That's unbelievable.
    Another thing: I found out that it's not only Mail that has the problem - it is any application that was started after the external display had been connected. It seems that OS X applies the font rendering setting at the moment a application is starts. When I disconnect the display, start Finder, Mail, Safari and so on, and then connect the display, then all the applications look great even on the external display. When I quit the apps and then restart, the font rendering is broken again

  • Font rendering is poor after a hard reset

    After a crash, I had to power off my MBP. Since it rebooted the font rendering has been poor. I have posted an image here to show you the difference. It is slight, but the font rendering used to be much more crisp. Now they appear too soft and blurred around the edges.
    http://img.skitch.com/20100508-xmrup6hx2q3eqqqkj6rekhg6hc.png
    Can anyone tell me what might have happened and how to fix it?
    Thanks!
    Mason

    Looking at the image, it seems that your computer has changed its font smoothing setting.
    You can alter this by going to System Preferences->Appearance and ticking the "Use LCD font smoothing when available" box.
    It doesn't apply to running applications, so you need to quit and restart Safari to see the change.

  • [SOLVED] Font rendering messed up after latest freetype2 upgrade.

    I haven't touched my font configuration, but the appearance of most fonts has changed across the board (i.e. in every application) since I upgraded to freetype 2.4.6 yesterday. In particular, the fonts are less strong, and in LibreOffice Calc in particular the spacing is messed up at certain levels of magnification despite having hinting enabled. Here is my ~/.gtkrc-2.0:
    gtk-icon-theme-name = "nuoveXT2"
    gtk-theme-name = "Clearlooks"
    gtk-font-name = "FreeSans 10"
    gtk-xft-antialias = 1
    gtk-xft-hinting = 1
    gtk-xft-hintstyle = "hintfull"
    gtk-xft-rgba = "rgb"
    I have tried many combinations of AA and hinting, and nothing seems to work. Fonts do look slightly differently when I change the hinting settings (except in Calc), but they do not look as crisp as before the upgrade. Can anyone help me?
    Last edited by nbtrap (2011-08-01 01:44:13)

    It figures that I fix this right after giving up and posting to the forums. It seems that either (1) Xresources overrides gtk settings or (2) Libreoffice ignores gtk settings. I had not had any ~/.Xresources file, but after creating one:
    Xft.dpi: 96
    Xft.antialias: true
    Xft.rgba: rgb
    Xft.hinting: true
    Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
    and adding
    xrdb -merge ~/.Xresources
    to ~/.xinitrc,, the font rendering has returned to normal across all applications, The strange thing is that I didn't have an Xresources config file before when the rendering was working fine. It's also weird that fonts in GTK apps looks crisper with Xresources configured than they do with the same configuration in ~/.gtkrc-2.0. I can't figure out why, but at least it's now working.

  • ClearType support for font rendering on Windows?

    JavaFX 2.1 or higher supports LCD text - that's fine. But there is a big rendering difference to native font rending on Windows - JavaFX 2 text doesn't look as sharpen as Windows native apps looks. It's because we need clear type support like in JavaSwing!
    Is it planned to implement native font rendering with clear type?
    Best regards,
    Tobi

    Check out the announcement at the top of this forum listing:
    https://forums.oracle.com/forums/ann.jspa?annID=1713

  • Font rendering issue: Win7+Cp5.5 vs. XP+Cp4

    Hello all, here's the issue: font rendering when publishing under XP is perfect, crisp, and sharp, while on Win 7 looks blurry...
    I tried different versions of Captivate, different fonts, font settings, enabling/disabling cleartype. Nothing works and I'm really desperate to get old XP crisp look. Anyone experienced that? Any ideas? Thanks in advance for sharing.

    The Windows 7 version is definitely anti-aliased while the Xp version is not.
    In Win 7, right click on the desktop, and select Screen Resolution.
    Click the link to Make Text and Other Items Larger or Smaller.
    Make sure it is set to Smaller - 100% (default).
    Click the link in the left navigation panel to Adjust ClearType Text.
    Tick the box to turn on ClearType.
    Does that help?

  • Flex 4.5/FP10.2 web app: Font rendering problem

    Heya,
    Upped a web app from Flex 4.0/4.1 to Flex 4.5 & fonts started to render really badly (blurry & 'stronger').
    They are embedded as CFF, no errors or warnings gives. Also upgraded to Flash Player 10.2, which apparently has 'enhanched' font rendering.
    Haven't set applicationDPI on the s:Application tag, so DPI management should be disabled according to the docs.
    (See http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/mobileapps/WS19f279b149e7481c682e5a9412cf5976c17-8000.htm l)
    It's straight up @font-face embeds in a CSS file, nothing odd or wrong there.
    Is the case that this is how it's supposed to look now? In that case, how do I revert back to sane rendering?
    Do I need to configure 4.5 somehow to get it to do fonts right?

    Also tested Franklin Gothic, same deal. Tested on Mac (10.2) & PC (10.2 & 10.3). Flex 4.5 for both platforms.
    fonts.css:
    @font-face
    src: url("fonts/arial.ttf");
    font-family: Arial;
    font-weight: normal;
    embedAsCFF: true;
    FontTest.mxml:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
       xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
       xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600">
    <fx:Style source="fonts.css"/>
    <s:Label x="20" y="20"
    fontFamily="Arial"
    fontLookup="embeddedCFF"
    fontSize="12"
    cffHinting="horizontalStem"
    text="TESTAR Testar testar" />
    </s:Application>

  • Font rendering differences between Xfce and KDE

    Hi,
    I am using both KDE and Xfce (mostly Xfce with KDE apps) and I observed that there is a font rendering difference between Gtk (Xfce) and QT (KDE) apps.
    In both desktop environments I use dejavu sans font, size 9 and I have set RGB subpixel rendering and hinting to full.
    I created some screenshots of dolphin and thunar to illustrate the differences (right click and select view image to see the screenshots in full resolution)
    Can somebody help me to make gtk app fonts to look the same as qt ones? Or at least tell me why there is this difference.
    Thank you.

    I cant tell you why there is a difference, but this page may help you. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_Configuration
    I ended up installing the Ubuntu patched packages in the AUR, but there are different options.

  • Font rendering quality in Illustrator is terrible!

    What the heck rode Adobe when they implemented the new font engine?
    Why, oh why is Apple's font rendering so much better? And why wouldn't Adobe use something that's already readily available on the mac platform?
    I have a huge problem mocking up website layouts in Illustrator. Type looks much better in Firefox or Safari. How come, huh?

    I believe this is the result of sub-pixel antialiasing (SPAA), which optimizes text appearance on laptops. Illustrator's rasterizing doesn't SPAA, which is fine for most CRTs, print, and LCD displays that might be rotated.
    It's more a case of the OS being savvy enough to tell what kind of display you have and antialias appropriately. Illustrator's rendering engine does need to support SPAA.

  • Font rendering OS X issues

    Hi people,
    I baught a MacBook Air and I am new to OS X. I have this machine since 1 month and I simply cannot get used to the font rendering of OS X. I thought I get used to it after a while, but I don't. I feel like I have body lotion in my eyes all the time, fonts are really blurry and I can only work on that machine for some time. On my windows machine I worked all day long, with no such problems, but not in OS X. It is set to native resolution and I already set the font smoothing to 1, but this is still not enough, while turning font smoothing completely off makes everything look very ugly.
    I wonder why no one ever mentioned that in reviews, etc.? Does it not bother mac users? However, is there some other option (besides scaling down to lower resolution)? I have headache almost every evening, so this is really a problem to me.
    Thanks in advance.

    Do any other applications behave like that? Or just these two?

  • Weird Font Rendering Issue?

    Okay i was looking fo some back up drives online, and i stumbled upon:
    http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Seagate-Barracuda-7200-9-500GB-Internal-Drive-ST3 500641ARK/sem/rpsm/oid/168899/catOid/-12976/rpem/ccd/productDetail.do
    it renders like this:
    http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/4641/picture3rn0.png
    http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture4dr1.png
    but for some reason on my MacPro 2.66 the font renders odd in FireFox (doenst do it on Safari. and ive tried this exact sit eon my MacBookPro and it looks fine on Firefox.
    I have the following installed (on both machines)
    -FireFox 2.0.0.9
    -Microsoft Office 2004
    -Adobe CS2
    -Macromedia Studio 8
    theyre practically identical with programs & fonts installed, the only fonts that are installe are the ones that wer epreinstalled with the system, and that came with Office 04 and CS2
    any way to maybe fix this issue?

    hey! well i tried your site url on my MacPro and i have the same issue, so it must be a macpro thing? lol
    im running the latest firefox and no additional fonts installed other than the ones you have listed yourself (office, cs2, macromedia)
    so dont fret. i tried using font finangler and onyx to clean the font cache, (not sure i fhtat was a good idea,) but it shows up on mine so your not the only one! ive tried on two different macpros one wiht out any programs and it does the same thing. so it must be something with the wya its rendering on these machines.
    at first it hought maybe something got corrupted in my system aswell
    hope that helps!!

  • Picture to clear fonts?

    Hello
    I have a jpeg/png with text. After OCR in Acrobat 9 Pro the
    fonts are pixly. How can I get clear fonts?
    Do you have an idea?
    Thanks in advance
    nebben1000

    Thanks For the Post!!
    Please be advised that this forum is for discussions about
    the Acrobat.com online services only. Your best source of questions
    and answers for Acrobat would be in the
    Acrobat Windows
    Forums or the
    Acrobat Macintosh
    Forums.

Maybe you are looking for