CRM 2007 Service Contract Determinatio and returns/complaints

Hi gurus,
I'm currently struggling to set up the contract determination for our CRM 2007 for complaints and returns. I have set the flag contract determination D or F (both did not work for my tests). as well in the transaction type customizing I have set und customizing header the determination to service contract.
According to SAP help the copy control needs to be set up as well? I did not quite understand yet why, but I maintained a copy control between my contract and my return. Any special settings needed between my source contract and target return?
last step should be the copy control for item categories? I maintained both:
- Define copy control for item categories
- Define item category determination when copying
From my contract item category to my return item category.
But still I don't have any contract determination in my return.
Any hints please?

Hi Pepe,
thanks for your answer (points rewared). I managed to get it running for complaints before you answered. Now struggling to get it for our returns running as well.
I have a question for the copy control: What exactly has to be set up there? I guess I did for our complaints more then needed.
1. Copy control from contract to complaint transaction type.
2. copy control from contract item category to complaint item category
3. Define item category while copying: done the same as in step 2.
any special settings to consider for step 2?
Torsten

Similar Messages

Batch Management in CRM 2007 Service Transactions

Dear SAP colleagues,
I am dealing with a CRM 2007 Service project, and there is a question that has been in my mind for a while.
As far as I know, it is possible to manage product batches in CRM Sales. In fact, the field is standard delivered, and there are a couple of BADIs in SPRO, under Sales Transactions. But when talking about CRM Service, I can`t find any documentation about batch management anywhere, nor the possibility of configuring the functionality.
May anybody give me some light about this issue please?
Thanks in advance.
Pablo RM

Hi Rupesh,
thank you very much for your answer, but shall I understand that batch must be specified in ECC and cannot be recorded in CRM (in stardad logic)?
Let me explain you a bit more about our needs: we have products with batch numbers that can only be repaired with spare parts with same batch number, since they come from the same manufacturing batch. When defective products arrive to be repaired (we will use In-house repair orders to cope with this) and their batch numbers are identified, there should be an availability check of the spare parts needed considering their batches, just the same way as it is done in CRM Sales for products. As you say, once it has been released, the reservation is made in ECC.
I suposse that there's no solution but a custom development.
Well, thank you again and good bye.
Pablo

How crm visit the external website and return the value to crm

how crm visit the external website and return the value to crm?
Awen

Can you elaborate the question? I assume that you are looking for some sort of mechanism to validate a customer's web site?
Regardless of the scenario, the way to validate or retrieve a value from an external web site is to write a plugin that executes a WebRequest to the external site and reads the response.

CRM- Find Service contract from Internal Order Number

Hi Friends,
I would like to know how to get service contract from internal oredr number.
From service contract we can find internal order number by using CRM_ORDER_READ function module- table et_document_flow, but my requirement is how to find service contract from Internal order number.Any function module or BAPI available for this requierement ?
Regards
Vinayak Sapkal

Hi,
when the costs are transferred from CRM to R3, they are posted to an internal order. When a service order or incident is transferred to R3, we have to create an internal order for it, regardless of whether or not a contract has been assigned.
This is all linked to the logic used in CO to find the appropriate internal order. It works as follows:
The internal order is stored in the table IAOM_ASSIGNMENTS. This is accessed by a guid (the account assignment guid).
To get this guid, there is a second table IAOM_EXT_OBJ_INF. This table links the GUIDs coming from CRM, dependent on the CO Customizing for CRM (Mass Controlling, Header level, item level controlling etc.)
This is how we manage to link a service order to the internal order of a contract in the first place.
When we call CO, CO first looks for an assignment for the object guid passed. If a service order has been linked to a contract, nothing will be found for the object guid. CO will then check for assignments to the reference guid and find the contract entry.
If no contract has been assigned, CO will create an internal order based on the service order guid.
From a CRM point of view, costs are assigned directly to an item, and so it makes no sense to have a reference guid for the costs or the possibility to change the guid via BADI.
regards
Waman

Service Contracts Line and Header Tax amounts are not matching

Hi,
I am creating service contracts using API. Using below code i am applying price adjustments on the line. while using the below API Tax is calculated at line level and added for each line But the Tax filed on the header is not getting updated. I fwe go to front end and click on reprice then the Tax amount is added to the header(If the contract created with status 'Entered').
Please help me to fix this.
l_multi_line_tbl (0).ID := l_x_clev_rec.ID;
l_multi_line_tbl (0).price_list_id :=l_curr_price_list_id;
l_multi_line_tbl (0).lse_id := 46;
l_multi_line_tbl (0).line_pl_flag := 'Y';
l_x_return_status := NULL;
apps.oks_auth_util_pub.compute_price_multiple_line (
p_api_version
=> 1.0,
p_detail_tbl
=> l_multi_line_tbl,
x_return_status => l_x_return_status,
x_status_tbl
=> l_status_tbl);
Thanks,
Hari

not answered yet.

Segmentation in CRM 2007 (6.0) with AND/OR functionality

We have been trying to understand the new functionality in Segment Builder for using the new multi-filter functionality of AND and OR. We know about the multiple filters and using them to u201Ccombineu201D results, but our question is specifically about using the AND functionality because it does not seem to be working (it works just like the OR functionality and we expected it to behave differently). We have tried several scenarios and cannot see any difference in the results whether we use AND Across, AND Within, OR Across, OR Within.
So let me give a more specific example. Let's say I have two attributes, color and type. Color=Red, Blue, Green, White, Black; Type=Sport, Sedan, Truck, Van. Then I have the following assignments of the attributes: Red=Sally, Tom, Joe, and Dick; Truck=Bill, Tom, Sam, Debbie, and Joe.
If I use OR Across attributes, with Red and Truck, I will get those who have any color of Red OR those who have any type of Truck: Result is Sally, Tom, Joe, Dick, Bill, Sam, and Debbie.
If I use AND Across attributes, with Red and Truck, I should only get those who have a Red Truck: Result is Tom and Joe. However, what we have found in our testing is that we get the same result with AND Across attributes as we do with OR Across attributes.
How do we get just those who have both a Red color and a Truck type? Or is the AND functionality broken? If I cannot get this result using the AND/OR functionality, how can i get this result in Segment Builder?
Also see this related Thread: Segment builder and/or functionality....
Thanks, Bryan

So, let me add the step to this that specifically is not working. Let's add to this the fact that to the Material of Truck, there are attached Warranties and Service Contracts (Truck is part of an equipment master). So, now I want all Red Trucks which have a Warranty expiring this month AND no Service Contract. To further explain, the equipment master has a Type (Truck), and either a Warranty or Contract attached to it (either, both, or neither). So I want to use the AND to identify Trucks that have no Warranty or and expiring one, AND Trucks that have no Service Contract. I only want Trucks that meet both conditions at the same time.
In our testing, we have found that using the AND with the KEEP functionality it works in all cases EXCEPT when someone owns more than one Truck. For example, lets say Bob owns two Trucks, one has no Warranty but a Service Contract, and the other Truck has a Warranty, but no Service Contract. In this case, Bob should not show up in the Target Group because he does not own a Truck that has no Warranty AND no Service Contract. However, because he shows up in the no Warranty target group for one Truck, and the no Service Contract target group for the other Truck, when you do a KEEP you get Bob in the final Target Group. Is there any way to find just Trucks that have both no Warranty and no Service Contract?
Thanks, Bryan

Error in saving the Service Contracts, Orders and Confirmation

When we try creating the following document types in CRM4.0 and try saving we are getting the error as below.
'An error occurred in system during account assignment
Message no. CRM_ORDER_MISC 060
Diagnosis
Errors occurred when assigning an account assignment object to a business transaction. To view the error message, see the accompanying log file.
Transfer Log
No controlling type could be determined (Notification E IAOM 012)
We had cusotmised as per the earlier queries on similar subject
maintained following in customizing :
SPRO\CRM\master data\organizational management\cross-system assignment of Organizational units\
- assign billing units to sales organizations
- assign billing units to services/sales organizations
Billing Unit is a specific role of a Business partner.
But still the error persist. May we seek the expertise who have oversome silmilar issue.
Regards
Rafiq

Hi
i have got the answer for this question, i updated the registry with the correct file path, and then closed the registry, the services.msc file is automatically updated with the correct path
and then started the CSService, then went to the OEM setup i clicked Retry buton, then it went through.
Thanks to all the viewers.

BOM IN CRM Only for Service Contract

Hello
We want have a BOM explosion working in CRM for service contracts
Here are the details :
We have replicated the materials from ECC to CRM. We are not maintaining any BOMu2019s in ECC.
The idea is that we maintain the BOM Structure in CRM only, as we donu2019t want to have the Items as a billable item in a position, only for information purposes (or later on for metering)
We have maintained the product category for the header product in CRM so we are able to maintain depended components
(Relationship type SCDEC S Dependent Components (DC) )
Not we are able to assign dependent component to the header material
Item category groups:
We understand that the standard item category groups that should be used are ERLA for the header product and LUMF for the Item product.
In order to support the same functionality for the given item category group , maintained at the product level in ECC we copied the same setting for the item category group from the standard to
our settings.
Standart
Tx type     Item Cat Group          item category     structure scope
TA             ERLA                TAQ           A single level Explosion of Structured Product
TA         LUMF                TAP                   A single level Explosion of Structured Product
So we have copied TAQ to ZTAQ and TAP to ZTAP.
ZS01 is a copy of SC (service contract)
Tx type     Item Cat Group          item category     structure scope
ZS01     ZLEI                       ZTAQ          A single level Explosion of Structured Product
ZS01     LEIS                       ZTAP          A single level Explosion of Structured Product
But when we use a header product in the service contract, we cannot see the BOM is exploding.
We have also created some products in CRM with exactly the same Item Category groups as the standard and when we create a standard order (TA) in CRM, the BOM is NOT exploding.
Questions:
Is it possible to have the BOM setup only in CRM, like we try to do it?
Is it possible to use our own item category groups in CRM more is the functionality only working with ERLA and LUMF?
Is it possible to use the BOM Explosion in Service contracts as well ?
What steps are we missing to get the BOM explosion in CRM ?
Thank you for your help
Frank
Edited by: Frank Foerstner Foerstner on Dec 9, 2011 12:34 PM

Thanks Nablan, I could do that for multiple header coming in file. But I have a question for you on BAdI ALM_ME_006_GOODSMVT. I have implemented this BAdI , and this BAdI is called by a function Module ALM_MEREP_006_CREATE. When I test this FM giving the Material , Orderid and Movement type entries, this BAdI is triggered when giving a breakpoint. I've given this code for changing the movement type to 961. Cause the stanadrd scenario does not maintain Movement type 961 in Mobile Asset Management. The Movement type 961 for unplanned Materials comes to SAP and changes to 261 as maiantained by TCOKO table. To bypass this & retain the movement type 961 in SAP I'm using this BAdI. Currently this is what I'm doing and am stuck in the method interface how do I call the method.
method IF_EX_ALM_ME_006_GOODSMVT~CREATE .
break-point.
*DATA : i_ce_goodsmovement TYPE REFERENCE
          ALM_ME_CUSTOMER_ENHANCEMENT.
DATA : lr_badi_goods_movement TYPE REF TO if_ex_alm_me_006_goodsmvt.
DATA : ls_user_data TYPE ALM_ME_USER_DATA-USERID.
*DATA : goods_movement TYPE ALM_ME_MATERIAL_MOVEMENT.
CALL METHOD lr_badi_goods_movement->create
EXPORTING
       ce_goodsmovement = ce_goodsmovement
IMPORTING
       user_data        = ls_user_data
       custom_user_data = ls_ce_user_data
       goods_movement   = goods_movement
changing
       return           = return[].
CALL FUNCTION 'ALM_ME_COMMIT_OR_ROLLBACK'
       TABLES
            return = return.
endmethod.
Please help me to get the data in this method. How do I call this.

Service Contract header, line level and party data report.

Using 11.5.9.
In Service Contracts Module, trying to create a query that extracts header data, party data (role and name) and the name of the service from the lines/account tab, ie Full Service, Gold Service etc...
Created query that retrieve Service Contract header and party data, but when I try to join to mtl_system_items_b, I am getting a product description instead of the name of the service. I also include code below this that pulls in the lines from the lines/account tab which captures line 1.1 and has the correct service name. Note this code does not have the header data and party data built into it, but I am willing to modify either piece of code to create the need join and get the data returned.
SELECT
distinct (okhb.contract_number)     contract_number,
nvl(okhb.contract_number_modifier,'-') contract_modifier,
okhb.sts_code,
okhb.start_date     start_date,
okhb.end_date          end_date,
okprb.rle_code ROLE,
msib.description,
(msib.segment1) item_number,
hp.party_name
FROM
hz_party_sites ps,
hz_party_sites ps9,
hz_locations l,
hz_locations l9,
hz_cust_acct_sites_all ca,
hz_cust_acct_sites_all ca9,
hz_cust_site_uses_all cs,
hz_cust_site_uses_all cs9,
hz_parties hp,
hz_parties hp9,
okc_rules_b orb,
okc_rules_b orb9,
okc_rule_groups_b ogb,
okc_k_headers_b okhb,
okc_k_party_roles_b okprb,
okc_k_lines_b oklb,
ra_customer_Trx_all rcta,
mtl_system_items_b msib
WHERE
PS.LOCATION_ID = L.LOCATION_ID AND
ps9.location_id = l9.location_id and
L.CONTENT_SOURCE_TYPE = 'USER_ENTERED' AND
l9.content_source_type = 'USER_ENTERED' and
PS.PARTY_SITE_ID = CA.PARTY_SITE_ID AND
ps9.party_site_id = ca9.party_site_id and
CA.CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID = CS.CUST_ACCT_SITE_ID and
ca9.cust_acct_site_id = cs9.cust_acct_site_id and
ps9.party_id = hp9.party_id and
ps.party_id = hp.party_id and
cs.site_use_id=orb.object1_id1 and
cs9.site_use_id = orb9.object1_id1 and
orb.jtot_object1_code in ('OKX_SHIPTO'/*,'OKX_BILLTO'*/) and
orb9.jtot_object1_code = 'OKX_BILLTO' and
orb.rgp_id = ogb.id and
orb9.rgp_id = ogb.id and
okhb.id = okprb.chr_id and
msib.inventory_item_id = orb.object1_id1 and
okhb.contract_number = rcta.interface_header_attribute1 and
nvl(okhb.contract_number_modifier,'-') = nvl(rcta.interface_header_attribute2,0) and
ogb.chr_id = okhb.id and
okhb.sts_code = 'ACTIVE' and
okhb.contract_number in ('VO-7001','VO-7078') and
okprb.rle_code in ('CUSTOMER','END_USER')
--oklb.line_number||'.'||oklbs.line_number = '1.1'
order by okhb.contract_number;
select
     to_char(oklb.line_number)||'.'||to_char(oklbs.line_number) subline_number,
okhb.contract_number,
     okhb.sts_code,
(msi.segment1) item_number,
     msi.description,
     okcis.number_of_items,
round(months_between(element.date_completed , element.date_start))     billable_days,
     oklbs.start_date          start_date,
     oklbs.end_date          end_date,
     to_date(oklbs.attribute1, 'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')          warranty_start_date,
     to_date(oklbs.attribute2, 'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')          warranty_end_date,
     oklbs.attribute4 sales_order
from oks_level_elements_v element,
okc_rules_v rule,
okc_rule_groups_v grp,
oks_bill_cont_lines_v      obcl,
     okc_k_lines_v          oklbs,
     okc_k_items_v               okcis,
     mtl_system_items_vl     msi,
     okc_k_items_v               okci,
     okc_k_lines_v           oklb,
     okc_k_headers_v          okhb,
OKS_BILL_TRANSACTIONS_V obtrx
where trunc(element.date_start) = trunc(obcl.date_billed_from) and
rule.id = element.rul_id and
rule.rgp_id = grp.id and
grp.rgp_type = 'KRG' and
grp.rgd_code = 'SVC_K' and
grp.cle_id = oklbs.id and
oklbs.cle_id     = oklb.id      and
     oklbs.lse_id     <> '2'      and
okhb.sts_code = 'ACTIVE' and
     msi.inventory_item_id = okci.object1_id1 and
     msi.organization_id = 3      and
     okcis.cle_id          = oklbs.id and
     okci.cle_id          = oklb.id and
     obcl.cle_id           = oklb.id      and
     oklb.chr_id           = okhb.id      and
     obcl.btn_id = obtrx.id and
     okhb.contract_number like 'VO-7078' and
oklb.line_number||'.'||oklbs.line_number = '1.1'
order by okhb.contract_number, to_number(oklb.line_number), to_number(oklbs.line_number), oklbs.id;
Code that pulls in the correct description as seen at line level in Service Contracts Module.
OUTPUT of this query
CONTRACT_NUMBER     STS_CODE     ITEM_NUMBER     DESCRIPTION
XX-XXXX     ACTIVE     FULL SERVICE     FULL SERVICE

I guess you are looking for coverage name. You need to add two more table to join with items like as in
select inventory_item_id,a.name,a.item_description from mtl_system_Items_b c,okc_k_lines_tl a,okc_k_lines_b b
where organization_id=<organization_id>
and contract_item_type_code in ('SERVICE','WARRANTY')
and a.id=b.id
and b.chr_id=-1
and coverage_schedule_id=b.id;
Thanks
Nagamohan

BOM explosion in CRM Service Contract

Hello
We want have a BOM explosion working in CRM for service contracts
Here are the details :
We have replicated the materials from ECC to CRM. We are not maintaining any BOMu2019s in ECC.
The idea is that we maintain the BOM Structure in CRM only, as we donu2019t want to have the Items as a billable item in a position, only for information purposes (or later on for metering)
We have maintained the product category for the header product in CRM so we are able to maintain depended components
(Relationship type SCDEC S Dependent Components (DC) )
Not we are able to assign dependent component to the header material
Item category groups:
We understand that the standard item category groups that should be used are ERLA for the header product and LUMF for the Item product.
In order to support the same functionality for the given item category group , maintained at the product level in ECC we copied the same setting for the item category group from the standard to
our settings.
Standart
Tx type Item Cat Group item category structure scope
TA ERLA TAQ A single level Explosion of Structured Product
TA LUMF TAP A single level Explosion of Structured Product
So we have copied TAQ to ZTAQ and TAP to ZTAP.
ZS01 is a copy of SC (service contract)
Tx type Item Cat Group item category structure scope
ZS01 ZLEI ZTAQ A single level Explosion of Structured Product
ZS01 LEIS ZTAP A single level Explosion of Structured Product
But when we use a header product in the service contract, we cannot see the BOM is exploding.
We have also created some products in CRM with exactly the same Item Category groups as the standard and when we create a standard order (TA) in CRM, the BOM is NOT exploding.
Questions:
Is it possible to have the BOM setup only in CRM, like we try to do it?
Is it possible to use our own item category groups in CRM more is the functionality only working with ERLA and LUMF?
Is it possible to use the BOM Explosion in Service contracts as well ?
What steps are we missing to get the BOM explosion in CRM ?
Thank you for your help
Frank

Hi,
I did work on single level BOM explosion in a couple of projects. As per SAP note 549341 - FAQ: BOMs in the sales order, it is very much possible to explode multi-level BOMs.
Check this note and item category BOM explosion options.
<b>Do not forget to reward if it helps,</b>
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

Ibase and configuration error while creating a Service Contract

Hi,
I am creating a Service Contract programatically and not manually through the T-code CRMD_ORDER.
I am using the Function module CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE for the same as the FM BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI and CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN did not work for me because of the number of parameters that needs to be passed for creating the Service contract.
The Service contract does get created but there are errors corresponding to the Point of delivery and configuration missing.
The error corresponding to the point of delivery says "IS-U:allocate a point of delivery to the item" even though I am passing the values in the REF_OBJECTS field of the CRMXIF_BUSTRANS_ITEM structure.
Structure for the same is :
ls_objects_i-TYPE_REF_OBJ = 'B'.
ls_objects_i-object_task = 'I'.
ls_objects_i-PRODUCT_GUID = lv_product_guid.
ls_objects_i-PRODUCT_ID = p_product_id.
ls_objects_i-IBASE_COMP_GUID = ls_output-IBASE_GUID.
ls_objects_i-IB_INSTANCE = 1582.
ls_objects_i-IB_COMP_VALID = '20070926093651'.
ls_objects_i-SERIAL_NUMBER = '0102 46CC9C278B92025BE10000000AD5920E'.
append ls_objects_i to lt_objects_i.
p_ls_item-REF_OBJECT-data = lt_objects_i.
p_ls_item-REF_OBJECT-datax = 'X'.
Similarly,the error for the configuration says "Configuration for the item missing" and here again I am passing the values in the CONFIGURATION structure.
Structure for this is :
p_ls_item-configuration-data-consist = 'T'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-kbname = 32.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-kbvers = '0.0'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-kbprofile = 'E_H_B'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-complete = 'T'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-spras = 'E'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-cfginfo = 'VCOND=VARIANT_CONDITION_KEY'
ls_cuins-OBJ_TYPE = 'SERV'.
ls_cuins-class_type = 300.
ls_cuins-obj_key = 'E_H_B'.
ls_cuins-obj_txt = 'E_H_B'.
ls_cuins-QUANTITY = '1.0'.
ls_cuins-COMPLETE = 'T'.
ls_cuins-CONSIST = 'T'.
append ls_cuins to lt_cuins.
ls_config_i-instance = lt_cuins.
p_ls_item-configuration-data = ls_config_i.
p_ls_item-configuration-datax = 'X'.
clear ls_config_i.
ls_cuval-charc = 'DISCOUNT_EUR'.
ls_cuval-charc_txt = 'DISCOUNT_EUR'.
ls_cuval-value = '0.0'.
ls_cuval-value_txt
append ls_cuval to lt_cuval.
ls_instance-value = lt_cuval.
insert ls_instance into table lt_instance.
ls_config_i-instance = lt_instance.
p_ls_item-configuration-data = ls_config_i.
p_ls_item-configuration-datax = 'X'.
clear ls_config_i.
Kindly help if anyone has worked on this.......
Regards,
Puneet Jhari.

Hi,
I am creating a Service Contract programatically and not manually through the T-code CRMD_ORDER.
I am using the Function module CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE for the same as the FM BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI and CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN did not work for me because of the number of parameters that needs to be passed for creating the Service contract.
The Service contract does get created but there are errors corresponding to the Point of delivery and configuration missing.
The error corresponding to the point of delivery says "IS-U:allocate a point of delivery to the item" even though I am passing the values in the REF_OBJECTS field of the CRMXIF_BUSTRANS_ITEM structure.
Structure for the same is :
ls_objects_i-TYPE_REF_OBJ = 'B'.
ls_objects_i-object_task = 'I'.
ls_objects_i-PRODUCT_GUID = lv_product_guid.
ls_objects_i-PRODUCT_ID = p_product_id.
ls_objects_i-IBASE_COMP_GUID = ls_output-IBASE_GUID.
ls_objects_i-IB_INSTANCE = 1582.
ls_objects_i-IB_COMP_VALID = '20070926093651'.
ls_objects_i-SERIAL_NUMBER = '0102 46CC9C278B92025BE10000000AD5920E'.
append ls_objects_i to lt_objects_i.
p_ls_item-REF_OBJECT-data = lt_objects_i.
p_ls_item-REF_OBJECT-datax = 'X'.
Similarly,the error for the configuration says "Configuration for the item missing" and here again I am passing the values in the CONFIGURATION structure.
Structure for this is :
p_ls_item-configuration-data-consist = 'T'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-kbname = 32.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-kbvers = '0.0'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-kbprofile = 'E_H_B'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-complete = 'T'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-spras = 'E'.
p_ls_item-configuration-data-cfginfo = 'VCOND=VARIANT_CONDITION_KEY'
ls_cuins-OBJ_TYPE = 'SERV'.
ls_cuins-class_type = 300.
ls_cuins-obj_key = 'E_H_B'.
ls_cuins-obj_txt = 'E_H_B'.
ls_cuins-QUANTITY = '1.0'.
ls_cuins-COMPLETE = 'T'.
ls_cuins-CONSIST = 'T'.
append ls_cuins to lt_cuins.
ls_config_i-instance = lt_cuins.
p_ls_item-configuration-data = ls_config_i.
p_ls_item-configuration-datax = 'X'.
clear ls_config_i.
ls_cuval-charc = 'DISCOUNT_EUR'.
ls_cuval-charc_txt = 'DISCOUNT_EUR'.
ls_cuval-value = '0.0'.
ls_cuval-value_txt
append ls_cuval to lt_cuval.
ls_instance-value = lt_cuval.
insert ls_instance into table lt_instance.
ls_config_i-instance = lt_instance.
p_ls_item-configuration-data = ls_config_i.
p_ls_item-configuration-datax = 'X'.
clear ls_config_i.
Kindly help if anyone has worked on this.......
Regards,
Puneet Jhari.

How to link Sales Order with Service Contract and then with Install Base?

Hi Friends,
1) I would like to know the integeration process from sales order to Service Contract and then with Install Base.
2) I couldn't see anything enabled in Service Tab in Order Lines, its grayed out. Is there any set up/profile option to get it enabled?
3) How can we create AR invoice from Service Contract?
Please let me know if anyone has idea on this.
Thanks in Adavance,
Vara

Dear Sid,
Thanks for your promt response.
Let me explain you what I did.
1) I have booked a Bill Only sales order which has one order line, mentioned it as Service Item and provided the same details in Service Tab in Order lines. Now Line status is "Fulfilled"
2) Then Submitted Workflow Back Ground Process for OM Order Lines and it has created an AR Invoice and closed the line
3) And then submitted "Service Contracts Order Capture Integration Program" from SErvice Contracts Responsibility and it completed normal.
4) Now I went in to Launch Contracts Window and queried with the sales order but couldn't see any contract created
5) Then I went in to Reprocess Order Window and found this order shows an error message as "Referenced Product not present in the Installed Base", then I tried to reprocessed it, but the same error message again.
Here I have few doubts:
1) Are the AR invoice and Service Contract Billing Invoices same?
2) In above scenario AR Invoice has been created, I would like to do the billing from SErvice Contracts and need to create an Invoice in AR? how can I do that?
because as you explained in one of my questions earlier, A Single Invoice can be created for the whole duration of the contract. I want to do that and trying for the same.
3) Regarding the above error message, how can I resolve it and create the service contract against that Order?
Thank you so much for your helpful answers.
Regards,
Vara

Add extra Business Objects to model CRM 2007: Web Client Records

Hello,
Could anyone tell me how I can add more Reference Objects in Case Management?
I copied the model CRM 2007: Web Client Records and added a new node (with for example Business Object Service Order) just like product and installations (which are visible under the reference objects)
I created a new element type under SCMG_SP_CASE_RECORD --> Z_CRM_SPS_CASE_RECORD and in the customizing we attached the model to the case type under Case Management --> Extended Customizing --> Process Actions --> Assign Action Profile to Case Type.
Still the new Business Object in the model isn't visible under Case Management in de WebUI.
Could anyone tell me if I'm missing something or is there a config guide available how to add more business objects?
Looking forward to your replies.
Kind regards,
Joost Christenhusz

Eddie,
Are you familiar with Access Control Engine (ACE)?
Go through this -> http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/04/0177f9bb67ac4cafb84bb4d4c1d8fc/content.htm.
and https://websmp205.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700002121742006E.
Authorizations in CRM are controlled through ACE.
Hope this helps.
Amar.

Service Contract Determination for material product

Hello,
I am trying to implement service contract determination for a complaint and I observe that the service contract gets determined at the complaint item level only when I add a service type product at the item level and not when I add a product of material type. Is this a system limitation that a service contract can be determined only for a service product or am I missing some configuration? Has anyone else faced a similiar issue?
Thanks,
Divya.

hi divya
the contract get determined even after adding product of type material
1.create a srv contract (sc)
2.add product of type material
3. release the contract and save it (note the no.)
4.create a trnx complaint(crmc) maintain the setting fr contract determinition(F)
5.put the product in trnx and ur contract will get determined
see if it suffice ur requirement
"reward points if u find useful"

Integration of SAP IS-U Two Contract Model with CRM 7.0 Contract Mgmt

Hi,
We have 2-Contract model for all customers in SAP IS-U for distribution and supply services. We are also planning to implement CRM 7.0 Contract management and integrate with SAP IS-U. There is a talk in the air that CRM 7.0 Contract Management does not work with 2-Contract model in IS-U because of some POD replication issues in CRM and heard that some clients are currently facing this issue.
Our client is operating in Deregulated environment and we were planning to use Two contract model to separate the services.
Has anyone faced this issue in your projects or Is SAP working on this issue?
Please let me know if there are any workarounds where we can still use 2-contract model and integrate with CRM 7.0? Any help or inputs that can you can provide will be very helpful to us.
Thanks in advance.
Sachin

DearSachin,
As per Design it's only possible to have one contract at the same time per PoD.
If you in a deregulation market it's recommended you to use the IDE integration in CRM.
Unfortunatly your desired business scenario can be achieved on project base only. There are several ideas how to provide the data and the information. One would be to download only the most used contract category into the CRM system (eiher grid usage or supply) and have the other contract only in IS-U (no replication). With a customer enhancement it would be possible do retrieve the whole supply sceanario within the IC webclient.
Another idea would be to attach a new customer based field to the contract which indicates if the contract is a grid usage or supply contract and have the check for double contracts respect that data - this solution is quite tricky and should be considered only by very experienced consultants.
Or use 1 installation with 1 contract for simple supply scenario. The schema contains a rate for both, distribution and default supply. The default supply can be switched with an installation fact. In CRM, there is 1 contract with 1 product. If a customer switches to a 3rd party supplier, an inbound message from the supplier creates a second installation with a supply contract and switches off the default supply rate. This installation/contract is not visible in CRM, it is not replicated to CRM.
As you can see, there are some ideas how to solve your needs on project base, but unfortunatly SAP generally will not change the main architecture which allows several contracts per PoD.
I hope this information is helpful for you.
Regards
Olivia

CRM 2007 Service Contract Determinatio and returns/complaints

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for