CRM 4.0 interface with ECC 5.0

Hi,
We are going for upgrade of R/3 from 4.6C to ECC 5.0
I want to know how the interfsce of CRM with ECC 5.0 is it same as in R/3 4.6
IS there any documents on the internet to check for
Your help is appreciated

Hi Zack,
The interface is the same just the plug-in will be different. More information can be found at:
http://service.sap.com/r3-plug-in
Cheers
Andrew

Similar Messages

CRM 3.0 integration with ECC 6.0

Hi all, I wanted to confirm if CRM 3.0 can be integrated with ECC 6.0
If yes, then which support pack,etc. will be applicable and what all issues could be encountered in integration?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Animesh,
just to be clear.
the CRM and the backend ECC60 are communicating via Plug -ins
you can read more information here
http://service.sap.com/r3-plug-in
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000601131&
The other SP level of the systems (BASIS etc.) are independent.
Once you could conect the systems at basis level. You can begin your work at
Application level.
Whether you can have problems here please ask the CRM Gurus in a separate therad in other forum.
I Hope I have answered all of your questions.
Kind regards
Imre Takácsi-Nagy
Senior Support Consultant II.
SAP Global Support Center Austria
Netweaver WEB Application Server ABAP / JAVA

Middleware settings to map CRM Z table fields with ECC material master flds

Hi,
We want to create a Z table in CRM,this table willl have 2 fields External Material Group and Old Material Number.These 2 fields in CRM table are corresponding to same material master (MM03) fields in ECC.The changes to these fields done in ECC material master should be updated in CRM Z table.
I want to understand the middleware settings I need to do in order to map the ECC and CRM fields.
Thanks in advance for your help
Swapnil

Hi Swapnil,
I am new to Middleware, I am also having same requirement , can you please tell me the process how you resolved this thread.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Santosh.

Integration of CRM with ECC

Hi All,
We are doing same scenario(Integration of CRM with ECC and replication of material/customer).My question is how to integrate CRM and ECC(Proxy OR WS). what are the interfaces involve in sap pi and any software component required in PI side.
Please help me.
Regards
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Check first these links:
Synchronizing SAP CRM data to external systems via SAP PI
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0f10991-2c4d-3110-aab0-ad4bf5708baf?QuickLink=index&…
Regards.

Crm compatibility with ECC 5.0

Could you please confirm that CRM 2007 can be ran together with ECC 5.0 and where I could find these kind of "compatibility" informations?

Hi Edwin
see similar post with this topic ....
Such information normally found in the Master Guide for SAP CRM (service.sap.com/instguides). This you should check first.
As an integration of a complete application does not exist, but an integration on product instances ("systems") level, the following approach is possible as well
-identify the required product instance for your scenarios in the Scenario and Process Component List viewer (service.sap.com/scl)
- check the dependency matrix (see http://www.sap.com/community/flash/KW22_08_Story_1.epx)
Keep in mind: As integration topics depend on customer specific system designs, you should test the situation in your own system landscape (Above sources concentrate on general recommendations)
regards,
Andreas R

How SAP ECC interface with SAP SRM

Hi all,
I need to know how SAP ECC System interface with SAP SRM in management of Catalogs and Contracts: how can I upload, for example, Catalogs which are on SAP ECC to SAP SRM?
Thanks, best regards,
Maria

Dear Maria Bonomo,
I have gone thorugh the following link and it seems to answer your query:
www.sceis.sc.gov/content/dnld/agydir-1B.pps
Hope this helps you.
Do award points if you found them useful.
Regards,
Rakesh

Error: crm production is not sync with ecc production

Hi Middleware Experts,
I am facing one issue, "CRM Production is not sync with ECC production". I have searched alot but couldn't find any relevant material. Please let me know the steps to rectify this error.
Thanks,
Vsh

Hello,
Sorry forget the last note I suggest you,
Please check the following links might be helpful
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/28/370123814711d3ad6b0000e8a5bd28/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/46/57605601a208e7e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
thanks
Willie
Edited by: Willie Musa on Jul 6, 2011 10:43 AM

Compatible versions with ECC 6.0

Hi,
We are planning the upgrade of our SAP installations:
- R3 4.6C, 4.7 --> ECC 6.0
- BW 3.1, 3.5 --> BI 7.0 (NW2004s)
- SRM 2.0 --> SRM 5.0
- CRM 4.0 --> CRM 5.0
Of course we can't do all the upgrades at the same time, so, in order to decide in which order we make the upgrades, we must be sure that the new versions will be compatible with the old ones.
In the quicklink "service.sap.com/r3-plug-in", menu option "SAP R/3 plugin --> Integration of SAP R/3 / Enterprise, ERP and SAP Components" there are some tables where we can analyze the compatibility between all the BW, SRM and CRM versions and R3 versions prior to ECC 6.0 (4.6C, 4.7, ECC 5.0), according to the plug-in version. From 2005 there seems to be a strategy change in the integration interfaces:
"SAP ECC 6.0 and subsequent releases will automatically contain all integration interfaces that so far have been contained in the SAP R/3 Plug-In and that ensured the technical integration with other SAP Components."
As I understand, ECC 6.0 will automatically contain all the integration interfaces and there will be no more R/3 Plug-In versions. How can I check the compatibility between ECC 6.0 and the other BW, SRM and CRM versions? In the quicklink there are integration matrix available for R3 Enterprise and ECC 5.0 but there is no information for ECC 6.0. Are the versions compatible with ECC 5.0 too compatible with ECC 6.0? As ECC 6.0 seems to "automatically contain all integration interfaces that so far have been contained in the SAP R/3 Plug-In", does it mean that the integration matrix available for ECC 5.0 is too valid for ECC 6.0?
We have found a specific note (931020 "SRM connection to an ERP 2005 (ECC 600) backend") for the integration between ECC 6.0 and SRM but we didn't find any note regarding BW or CRM.
How can we check wich versions (BW, SRM, CRM) are compatible with ECC 6.0? Can we use the integration matrix available for ECC 5.0 in the quicklink "service.sap.com/r3-plug-in", are there specific notes like the one available form SRM (931020)?
We need to be sure as soon as possible that after the upgrade of our R3 4.6C and 4.7 versions to ECC 6.0 they will be compatible with our actual BW (3.1, 3.5), SRM (2.0) and CRM (4.0) versions.
Thanks in advance!!

to followed unicode rules.
ABAP Development under Unicode
Prior to Unicode the length of a character was exactly one byte, allowing implicit typecasts or memory-layout oriented programming. With Unicode this situation has changed: One character is no longer one byte, so that additional specifications have to be added to define the unit of measure for implicit or explicit references to (the length of) characters.
Character-like data in ABAP are always represented with the UTF-16 - standard (also used in Java or other development tools like Microsoft's Visual Basic); but this format is not related to the encoding of the underlying database.
A Unicode-enabled ABAP program (UP) is a program in which all Unicode checks are effective. Such a program returns the same results in a non-Unicode system (NUS) as in a Unicode system (US). In order to perform the relevant syntax checks, you must activate the Unicode flag in the screens of the program and class attributes.
In a US, you can only execute programs for which the Unicode flag is set. In future, the Unicode flag must be set for all SAP programs to enable them to run on a US. If the Unicode flag is set for a program, the syntax is checked and the program executed according to the rules described in this document, regardless of whether the system is a US or a NUS. From now on, the Unicode flag must be set for all new programs and classes that are created.
If the Unicode flag is not set, a program can only be executed in an NUS. The syntactical and semantic changes described below do not apply to such programs. However, you can use all language extensions that have been introduced in the process of the conversion to Unicode.
As a result of the modifications and restrictions associated with the Unicode flag, programs are executed in both Unicode and non-Unicode systems with the same semantics to a large degree. In rare cases, however, differences may occur. Programs that are designed to run on both systems therefore need to be tested on both platforms.
Other Changes
1.     Bit Statements
2.     Adding Field Sequences
3.     Loops with VARY and VARYING
4.     Creating Subroutines
5.     Saving Programs
6.     Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
7.     Unreachable Statements
8.     Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
1. Bit Statements
Previously, the system checked for the bit statements SET BIT i OF f [TO g] and GET BIT i OF f [INTO g]whether the field f is character-type; X fields, X strings, and flat structures are usually regarded as character-type. For Unicode programs this is no longer useful, because the types X and XSTRING no longer count as character-type and the bit by bit access to character-type fields or structures is no longer platform-independent. Therefore, with these operations in Unicode programs, the field f must be type X or XSTRING.
For the bit mask operations f O x, f Z x, and f M x you could previously use all number-type and hence all character-type types for the left operand f. In Unicode programs, the f operand must now be type X or XSTRING.
2. Adding Field Sequences
When adding field sequences, restrictions apply to the following statements in Unicode:
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz [ ACCORDING TO sel ] GIVING m ...
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz TO m [ RANGE str ].
1.     The operands n1, n2, and nz must be type-compatible with one another.
2.     The distance between nz and n1 must be an integral multiple of the distance between n2 and n1.
3.     A syntax or runtime error occurs if the fields n1, n2, and nz are not in a structure. This structure must be recognizable statically or its valid area must be marked explicitly using the RANGE addition.
4.     At runtime, the system ensures that the RANGE area is not left.
ADD n1 FROM i1 GIVING m [ RANGE str ].
1.     Field n1 must be within the structure. The structure must be explicitly defined using the RANGE addition if it is not recognizable statically.
2.     For this variant, the system also checks at runtime whether n1 and the addressed values are within the structure.
3. Loops
Loops with the VARY or VARYING addition are also problematic in Unicode, since a type-a access to memory contents cannot be ensured and memory can be overwritten inadvertently.
DO ... VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2.
For this statement, the fields f, f1, and f2 must be type-compatible with each other. To prevent memory contents being overwritten, a RANGE for valid accesses is introduced implicitly or explicitly for the following statements:
DO ... TIMES VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2 [ RANGE f3 ].
WHILE ... VARY f FROM f1 NEXT f2       [ RANGE f3 ].
A syntax or runtime error is caused if f1 or f2 are not included in f3. If the RANGE addition is missing, it is defined implicitly from FROM f1 NEXT f2 as follows:
1.     If both f1 and f2 are statically recognizable components of the same structure, the valid RANGE area is defined from the smallest structure that comprises f1 and f2.
2.     A syntax error is triggered if it is recognizable statically that f1 and f2 are not part of the same structure.
3.     A valid area must be defined explicitly using the RANGE addition if the connection between f1 and f2 is not recognizable statically.
If you specify a deep structure as the RANGE addition, the system checks for every loop pass that there are no field references, object references, tables, or strings in the area read.
4. Creating Subroutines
When automatically generating subroutines using the statement GENERATE SUBROUTINE POOL itab NAME name, the generated program inherits the content of the Unicode flag of the generating program.
5. Saving Programs
When automatically generating programs using the statement INSERT REPORT prog FROM itab, default values are set for the TRDIR entry as before. Amongst other things, this statement has the new addition UNICODE ENABLING uc, with which the Unicode flag of the inserted report receives the value of uc. If this addition is missing, the following applies:
1.     A Unicode program creates a Unicode program.
2.     A non-Unicode program in turn creates a non-Unicode program.
3.     A non-Unicode program becomes a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a Unicode program.
4.     A Unicode program remains a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a non-Unicode program.
6. Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
For the statements GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f and GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f, f must be character-type. You can use the EXPORT and IMPORT statements for storing non-character-type fields and structures.
7. Unreachable Statements
In Unicode programs, unreachable statements cause a syntax error. In non-Unicode programs, there was previously only a syntax warning.
8. Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
In Unicode programs, calling a function module, whose parameter names are specified statically as a literal or constant, causes an exception that can be handled if an incorrect parameter name was specified. This only applies to function modules that are not called via Remote Function Call. In non-Unicode programs, an incorrect name was previously ignored.

CRM Sales Order to SAP ECC troubleshooting

Hi,
I'm trying to replicate SAP CRM Sales order to SAP ECC, I have matched (transaction and document type, item categories). But when I create sales order in CRM, the following error occurs in the Web UI:
Transmission log
SALES_HEADER_IN has been processed successfully (Notification S V4 233)
The sales document is not yet complete: Edit data (Notification W V1 555)
Unknown object type 'BUS2032' (Notification E RL 303)
SALES_ITEM_IN has been processed successfully (Notification S V4 233)
Please note that the BDOC messages state in the middleware is processed and everything looks fine in SMW01. The customer and product are already replicated from the ERP
Is there a more user friendly method to debug the error and to know the exact error.
Thanks In Advance,
Ahmed

Hi Ahmed, ,
It seems that the CSA bdoc is green (the internal CRM one) but the second , the replication one, is not created
due to this error.
Here a few advises:
Fistly create the same document directly in ECC. You might already get the same incompletion log as well in ECC and the reason should be quite obvious then.
Check as well in ECC in t-code SE91 as in which program error RL 303 is used. You might have customized code in ECC.
If this is not helping please use as well report CRM_ODE_CHECK_CFG to fing out if there some missing settings in the
BTX interface. See as well note 490932 (it is an old note but the settings mentioned are still relevant for highr releases).
Good luck with it.
Best regards
Christophe

Interface with Exchange server

Hi i nbeed to write a program to interface with ms exchange dose anyone have any sample code i can look at? i need to extract info such as appointments.

I'll be interested too. I'm writing a java app that would need to read and create calendar appointments, contacts and tasks. The java app is a CRM program, and its database becomes master for the exchange server that would replicate certain information coming from the CRM database/system.
rgds,
David

CRM Consumer (Organisation) Mapping with R/3

Hello Guru's,
I am facing a problem, we are implementing CRM Service for one of our Client, in Service we need to map Installed At Partner function with R/3. We created Installed At Partner function under the role CRM006 Consumer (Organisation), so that it can be replicated in ECC.
In PIDE transaction code, I mapped
CRM->R/3: Assign BP Classification to Account Grp:
Claasification: A (Consumer Organisation), Account Group: 0170, Name: Consumer.
I am getting an error, while transferring Consumer Organisation from CRM to ECC i.e. Organisation cannot be created in Account Group "Consumer".
As we dig deeper in ECC, we found that Account group 0170(Consumer) is only valid for Person, how do we map Consumer(Organisation) with ECC Account Group.
Kindly send your reply ASAP.
Best Regards,
Anup Bansal

Hello,
Is there someone, who has some idea on the above querry
Anup Bansal

CRM IC email integration with Google

Dear all,
We have a CRM IC („OnPrem“) prospect. The customer's corporate email system is based on Google.
Would anybody be able to share some information regarding the feasibility of CRM IC ERMS integration
with Google for in and outbound email communication (SCOT interface).
Your input is very much appreciated.
Best regards,
Henrik
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best
Regards,
Henrik Vogt
Senior Consultant
SAP Deutschland SE & Co. KG I
Rosenthaler Str. 30 I 10178 Berlin I Germany
M +49 160 90819696 I mailto:[email protected] I http://www.sap.de

Hello,
I think you're missing one setup step in the client-side groupware integration: the customizing.
In SPRO>CRM>CRM Middleware and related comp-->Settings for client-based synchronization.
The reason why your reply button is inactive is probably due to the missing custo setting. In the custo activity mentioned above you must specify which transaction types you'll use for incoming and outgoing e-mails. If eg the outgoing email transaction type is disabled, the buttons on the screen to send an outgoing e-mail (reply) will also be disabled.
P.S. The setup of client-based groupware integration is also described in building block C31 Activity Management (chapter 3.6) of the SAP best practices on help.sap.com. An installation guide is also available on service.sap.com.
Hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Joost

New Extractors GL with ECC 6.0

All,
Currently we have ECC 5.0 system and we have 0FI_GL_10 extractor providing us the reports based on P&L and Balance Sheet. The major issue with it is that it brings in 51 times the number of records because we have 16 periods and 3 currencies.
We are planning on upgrading ECC system in near future. We want to have our GL base reports coming out of the new extractors. I have heard that the new extractors make it much better with ECC 6.0. We have our blance sheet and Detailed P&L reports coming out of current extractor.
Can anyone who has implemented new extractor help on explaining which new extractor can best replace this functionality?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Go through the links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/e2/f16940c3c7bf49e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/29/830e405c538f5ce10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/e6/f16940c3c7bf49e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Re: New GL cubes 0FIGL_V10, 0FIGL_V11
Note 1070629 - FAQs: New General Ledger Migration
Cost Elements:Cost Element ( KSTAR ) should be available in the extract structure ( FAGL_EXTSTRUCT_LEAD ) of 0FI_GL_10.Append the structure to get cost element, activate , uncheck the hidden tab.
Features of the Extractor
Extraction method: F1 (function module (complete interface))
Extractor: FAGL_GET_TT_DATA_LEAD
Extraction structure: FAGL_EXTSTRUCT_LEAD
If you include your own fields in the totals table of the new General Ledger using transaction FAGL_GINS, these fields are not included in the extraction automatically. You first have to include them under the same name in an APPEND to extraction structure FAGL_EXTSTRUCT_LEAD. The fields of the APPEND structure are then filled automatically.
Santosh

BI 7.0 is along with ECC ?

Hi friends,
I need to know some informartion regarding BI 7.0
If we order ECC version cds then can we get BI 7.0 along with it or do we need to order ECC and BI separately.
what abour CRM ? is it is with ECC ?
Thanks
Tony

Hi Tony,
With ECC6.0, you get Bi 7.0(but u should get a separate licence for it)
Thanks,
Hari.A

Pro/E integration with ECC 6.0

I want to integrate Pro/E with ECC 6.0 in order to transfer/exchange engineering data such as materials, BOMs, engineering changes, documents, etc.
Does anyone know of Pro/E functionality or a 3rd party product that does this sort of thing?
Kind regards,
Rex L. Farris

A direct interface is developed by .riess GmbH and SAP. It is SAP certified and supported by SAP.
For more information,
Go to <a href="http://service.sap.com/plm">http://service.sap.com/plm</a>
Life-Cycle Process Support -> Product Development -> Integration -> MCAD Integration -> Pro/ENGINEER

CRM 4.0 interface with ECC 5.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for