CRM 5.0 - IC WebClient - Transaction Issue

Hi
We have a Service Ticket Transaction as our main Transaction with Business Activity & Task as Dependant Transactions.
I wanted to remove the dependant transactions (Business Activity & Task) so used: Define Business Transaction Profile for current Web Client Profile and deleted the 2 transactions.
Unfortunately when I go into Follow Up Transaction I see I still have these 2 Transactions as possible options.
Even went so far as to delete the Business transaction profile and create another, but still thes 2 Transactions are visible.
Any guidance on thids will be richly rewarded.
Regards
Panduranga

Hello Panduranga,
First of all, make sure the buffer is not the problem.
Refresh all buffers by entering /$SYNC in the transaction box. (Don't do this on a production system!!)
If that doesn't solve your problem you can try this:
1. Delete them as follow-up transaction in the copy control customizing.
SPRO->CRM->Transaction->Basic settings->Copying control for Bus Trans.->Define copying control for Trans. Types.
Delete here the follow-up transactions you don't want to see in the dropdownbox.
2. Edit the follow-up transaction types and remove the channel 'ICW Interaction Center Webclient' so they are no longer usable in the WebClient.(Only CRM 5.0)
SPRO->CRM->Transactions->Basic settings->Define Trans. Types.
Select the trans. type you want to hide. CLick on "Allowed channels for trans. type" and delete the WebClient entry.
This should solve your problem.
<b>Reward points if useful!</b>
Regards,
Joost

Similar Messages

  • CRM 4.0 IC webclient to CRM 2007

    Hi
    Currently we are on CRM 4.0 using IC Webclient for our call centre. Around 30% of development done in BOL layer programming to suit the business requirements.
    Now we are planning to upgrade to CRM 7.0 with IC Webclient
    Can anybody help us in providing information and precautionary measures to be considered for upgrade.
    Regards
    Satish Kumar

    Hi,
    just wanted to stress that even than BOL/ genIL is still compatible it has been significantly increased especially around the advanced and saved searches and some more new features like a generic "text-for-key" support service to facilitate UI development.
    The biggest change however that you might experience in the BOL layer is, however, the complete BOL support of all CRM objects including all sub objects, relations and attributes. So the enhancements that you have done in your 4.0 project might not even be necessary anymore unless you've introduced completely new objects. Also fields you added via EEW will be available in the respective BOL objects without manual code effort.
    On the UI layer itself you have to be aware that even though the whole CRM 2007 UI is based on the same UI framework as CRM 4.0 IC WebClient, this framweork has been significantly enhanced and supports now also concepts as components (to organize, structure and manage different areas of the CRM application), reuse via components and windows etc. Also there are two new sets of tags: THTMLB (Low level UI controls such as input fields, tables and trees) and CHTMLB. The latter one contains eta tags for configuable views that allow the adjustment of views via the configuration tool, which allows defining fields and arrangement on a form or a table as well as re-labelling.
    Also the toolset in general has been heavily enhanced and there's also the concept of modification-free enhancements on the UI layer based on inheritance.
    The upgrade will be "technical" meaning that all your stuff will survive but due to the componentization of the UI framework will not run out of the box in the new environment. You will have to "re-do" investments you've done on the UI side - however this should be much easier compared to 4.0 due to configurability of the UI and the improved toolset.
    I hope this information helps to get an idea what you can expect.
    Edited by: Peter Conrad on Apr 23, 2008 5:09 PM

  • Purchasing Document Output - Transaction issue Purchas Order

    Hello colleges
    we want to use Transaction issue Purchas Order for output PO ,
    we find that we cant preview PO from this Transaction before printing  and all so we can not have the possibility to  print some POu2019S  when we print use the output manually.
    Can some one help ??
    Is there possibility to mark several POu2019S and print them whit one push button ??
    Can we have the possibility to preview PO data before print it? We need your advise u2026  
    Best regards
    Gil Shinar

    Hello ,
    1.For the first question of printing multiple PO's at the same time you can use the report RSPPFPROCESS using SE38 transaction. You have the possibility of defining the PO number range that you want to output in one Go.
    2. There is no possibility to preview and print in 'Issue Purchase Order' transaction. You can achieve the same  only in 'Process Purchase Order' (BBP_POC) transaction .
    Best Regards,
    Sapna

  • Data download from CRM from standard browser based transactions

    This is, I'm afraid, rather a general question. I'm doing some R&D for a software development company (SAP Partner), and we're looking for a few use cases for where data is downloaded from CRM, specifically from browser based transactions. We're not interested in anything that downloads from ALV - we've got that covered. Our main concern is other download mechanism that might be available in standard CRM functionality.
    If anyone can point to some use cases, involving data download from a browser front end (web dynpro, presumably), that would be very useful.

    Hello Matthieu,
    As far as CRM7.0 is concerned (which is bsp-based) here are a few applications where users can download information from sap to local pc:
    - Take any result list table and hit the "download to excel button".
    - Start the "data import tool" that is available in UTIL_SALES business role, you'll be able to download an Excel file as well
    - Click any link to attached documents to a business object (sales order transaction for example)
    - Etc.
    If you need help to start one of those application just let me know.
    Regards
    Nicolas.

  • ITunes Store Transaction Issue

    Can someone tell me how to contact iTunes for Transaction issues?
    PROBLEM:
    As you know, when we buy something from iTunes, it the "transaction details" says something like:
    "OUTSTANDING TRANS#****-****-****-**** MISCELLANEOUS DEBIT DEBIT". (The "****" being the card number).
    It has said that for the past several day in my "Transation History".
    How do I know its iTunes? My Bank told me + Everytime iTunes stuffs up (as in I buy something, and its not registsredt rpoperly I have to give the security number on the back of your debit card). So this time, I put the Security Number in maybe a few times, thinking I had to, and each time I did. They took $1 debit from me.
    Has anyone else encountered this?

    Try redownloading it via iCloud.
    Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
    If the problem persists, see this article.
    How to report an issue with Your iTunes Store purchase
    B-rock

  • CRM 5.0 - IC WebClient - Warning on Follow Up Transaction

    Hi Gurus
    I would have thought I could fex this by myself but hitting a dead end.
    We're using Business Activity & Task transactions for follow ups. I keep getting this warning when I try yo create a Follow up:
    "Codes for subject profile category "G" are not permitted in this trans."
    There are no furhter details available on this warning, and I cannot locate a hit on SDN for it.
    I would have thought it would be something to do with my Catalog selection but I'm not finding anything wrong in my setup.
    Max points for the right guidance.
    Many Thanks
    Panduranga

    Hi Rekha
    I think you are pointing me in the right direction, just a point before I continue
    When I view the available Catalogs, all except Catalog G1 "Cancellation Reasons" have a Keyword, as the Keyword for G1 is blank could this be causing an issue. This was how it was supplied from SAP.
    We are using 3 Transactions
    Z000 Business Activity - Transaction Category = Business Activity
                                                                           With Subject Profile Category - 
                                                                           Activity Reason
    Z003 Service Ticket - Transaction Category = Service Process          
                                                                      With Subject Profile Category - 
                                                                      Service
                                 & Transaction Category = Business Activity
                                                                      With Subject Profile Category - 
                                                                      Activity Reason
    Z004 Task - Transaction Category = Task          
                                                         With Subject Profile Category - 
                                                         Activity Reason
    Do you see an issue with this config.
    Generally we Open Up Webclient
                        Confirm Account
                        Create Service Ticket
                        Goto Interaction Record - Followup
                        Select either Business Activity or Task as Follow Up
                        Then select Follow Up Details to complete the Follow Up
                        This is when the error occurs
    Regards
    Panduranga

  • CRM 5.0 IC Webclient Issue - Upgrading OS to Windows Vista and I.E 7.0

    Dear Gurus,
    I'm supporting CRM 5.0 and right now, users are running the IC
    Webclient on Internet Explorer v 6.0. Recently, there has been
    plans to upgrade the OS on users' PC to Windows Vista and it
    comes with I.E 7.0. I checked the Product Availability Matrix on
    SAP and found that there is a patch to cater for I.E 7.0.
    My users are also using CTI function. However,there is no patch for CRM SAP Groupware Connector for IE 7.0.
    Please assist. If CTI cannot function with IE 7.0, my users will
    be stuck with OS Windows XP.

    Dear John,
    Thank you for your reply. I am a newbie in this area. Do bare with me for my inquiries on the subject.
    For my customer's implementation, the ICI interface has been configured to communicate to external communication management software from Nortel.
    I raised such an inquiry because, per my checking on the PAM for CRM 5.0, the information on SAP Groupware Connector is parked under the Web Browser tab. Per my understanding,the Groupware Connector executes message synchronization
    between the CRM server and the Groupware server, in this case, it would be the AMC server.
    I was wondering on:
    1. the impact it would have on the above matter, if patches were to be applied on the server
    2. whether there is a relation between the Group Connector and ICI interface, that would cause an impact on IC Webclient if patches for the browser upgraded is applied to the CRM server. There is no patch available for Groupware Connector for I.E 7.0.
    The patches to be applied are for the following components:
    SAP_ABA     - Cross-Application Component
    SAP_BASIS - SAP Basis Component
    SAP_AP - SAP Application Platform
    SAP_BW - BBPCRM
    Please assist. I'd appreciate your help.
    p/s: Are you using IE 7.0 with CRM? Was the server patch process a challanging one? Hope you can share. TQ

  • Log off pop when navigating from SAP CRM Web IC to Utilities transactions

    Hi Experts,
    I have created about 100 transaction launchers for ISU transactions, which are linked to the navigation bar in the Web IC. If I Click on this link which should open an ISU trnsaction, it doesnt open the ISU transaction. Rather it gives me a pop up as LOG OFF. The problem is most of the transactions are opening up this way, but there are only a few that doesnt open up and gives a log off error.
    The client mapping of CRM system and Utility system has been done.

    Hi Friends,
    I have configured a transaction launcher for ISU transaction code EL27 and EL29,
    I am facing the simular issue, when try to access these transaction from ICWC i face the same problem. Logged off successfully screen appears.
    Please let me know if you resolved this error.
    Thank you.

  • CRM 5.0 - IC WebClient - Subject Profile

    Hi Gurus
    (I've posted this on CRM - Web Application but not having any joy)
    Having major issues with this so could someone please guide me.
    We have 3 Transactions
    1. Service Ticket (Service Process)
    Business Transaction Category
    Service Process - With Subject Profile
    Business Activity - With Subject Profile
    (Transactions are used for Service Ticket & Interaction Record)
    2. Business Activity (Business Activity)
    Business Transaction Category
    Business Activity - No Subject Profile
    (Transactions are used for Follow Up)
    3. Task (Task)
    Business Transaction Category
    Task - No Subject Profile
    (Transactions are used for Follow Up)
    As far as I know if I want to setup "Reason" value for the Follow Up Details screen I have to assign the values to a Subject Profile which is then linked to my Follow up Transactions.
    My problem is everytime I link a Subject Profile to the Transaction, when I get to the Follow Up details BSP I get a Warning "Codes for Subject Profile "G" are not permitted in this trans"
    This is appearently because my main Transaction is a Service Transaction while the Follow Ups are Activities.
    There's no copying control involved in any of this.
    Does anyone have a clue on how I can resolve this.
    Max points for the defining answer.
    Regards
    Panduranga

    Is aanyone able to help with this?
    Thanks

  • CRM 5.0 - IC WebClient - Due Date - Working Hours for Service Ticket

    Hi Gurus
    We're using a Service Ticket Transaction which has a Date Profile which provides a 48 Hour window for which the user must complete the Service Ticket Resolution.
    The issue is I want to tie this up to the Business working Hours. I just cannot figure out where I define the Business Working Hours.
    This is a Standalone CRM Implementation. Maximum points for the right answer.
    Many Thanks
    Panduranga

    Hi,
    The response time of 48 Hours must be maintianed in response profile... right?
    Similarly there is a availability profile in which you maintain the business hours/ availablity of your resources.
    These both together make a service profile.
    The availability profile is maintained in SAP Easy Access> Service> Service Contracts and Service Plans --> CRMD_SERV_SLA - Maintain Availability and Response Times
    Hope this will help
    Regards
    Rekha Dadwal

  • CRM 5.0 IC WebClient NOT Compatable with IE7?

    Hi Group
    I have been trying to run the WebClient from IE7 and it doesnt work.  My landscape is :
    CRM 5.0
    Windows XP
    Internet Explorer 7 (Release Candidate)
    I launched the WebClinet link from CRM.  System takes me to the web link.  When I click to choose the profile, IT DOESNT GO ANYWHERE FROM THERE.
    Are we required to carryout any config related issues either in IE7 or WinClient.
    Ramana

    Hi Ramana,
    I dont think its an IE7 problem. Did you do all the peroper settings?
    You will have to set a paramter in RZ10.
    Set your server name
    Paramter Name: SAPGLOBALHOST
    Value : <your server name>
    also, increase your session time out period in the proper Paramter.
    Regards,
    Liju

  • CRM 5.0 - IC WebClient - Service Ticket vs Service Order Navigation

    Hi Gurus
    Have any of you experts out there used the Badi: Navigation to Service Ticket and Service Order.
    This Badi is located at: SPRO->IMG->Customer Relationship Management
    ->Interaction Center Webclient->Business Transactions->Service Ticket
    ->Business Add-Ins (Badi)s.
    We are using Service Tickets only, yet when searching in the Inbox we locate our Service Ticket Transactions, when we select the Transaction it opens in Service Order view, not Service Ticket view.
    My understanding is that this Badi can resolve the issue, does anyone have an example of the code they've used in this Badi to force navigation to the Service Ticket.
    This is highly critical to our implimentation, therefore maximum points for the right answer
    Many Thanks
    Panduranga

    Hi Panduranga ,
    Here is a method in BADI.
    pay attention that's only one BADI can be active so deactivate default BADI.
    method IF_EX_CRM_ICWC_SERVICE_NAV~NAVIGATE.
        case iv_process_type.
         when 'TSVO'.                                           "#EC NOTEXT
    * navigate to Service Ticket
           rv_navigation_link = 'ServiceToSrvTHead'.            "#EC NOTEXT
           return.
         when 'ZTSV'.                                           "#EC NOTEXT
    * navigate to Service Ticket
           rv_navigation_link = 'ServiceToSrvTHead'.            "#EC NOTEXT
           return.
    *    when 'WRS1'.                                           "#EC NOTEXT
    * navigate to WebRequest
          when others.
    * navigate to "normal" Service Order
            rv_navigation_link = 'ServiceToServHeader'.         "#EC NOTEXT
            return.
        endcase.
    endmethod.
    Good Luck
    Eli Steklov
    <b>Please Reward Points if it Helps </b>

  • Portal and IC Webclient Transaction Launcher conflict

    We have integrated IC Web Client within Enterprise Portal by creating iview that launches IC Web client in a new browser window
    Additionally, within IC Web client we have configured the Navigation Bar using the transaction launcher launch to various Non BSP URLs (e.g. www.ups.com) in a new browser window (stateful checkbox).
    The problem weu2019re experiencing is if an agent launches a new browser window by selecting a URL from the Navigation Bar and then closes this browser window manually they are getting a prompt to save their work.  This behavior only occurs when we start IC Webclient from the portal.  When we use IC Webclient outside of portal the problem does not occur.
    How to remove that SAVE popup?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Muthappan

    Hi,
    When using the Transaction Launcher Wizard you have to enter at Transaction Parameters
    parameter = ICWEBCLIENTBORKEYPARAMETER
    Value = //currentCustomer/BP_NUMBER
    We use a BOR transaction to open the tc. BP (BOR object type BUS1006, method EDIT) so the confirmed BP will be opened in edit mode.
    CRM 4.0
    Regards,
    Mihai

  • Creating Compalint in CRM 7.0 IC WebClient

    Hello Experts,
    We are implementing CRM 7.0 Service. Interaction center is one of the components.
    We are creating Compalint in Interaction Center, a follow-up document e.g. a Service Order needs to be created. We are facing an issue, that Items are not getting copied over from complaint to follow-up document. Things are working fine in GUI.
    Has anybody came across similar sinario?
    Thanks
    Rashmi

    Hi Ambar,
    Check the following settings:
    1. Define Generic OP mapping in Navigation bar profile assigned to your Business role.
    2. Check the authoization profile in PFCG.
    3. Check the Channel for all the transaction, Make sure that channel (GUI :CRM Web client UI) is removed for all the transactions.
    4. In Item Categories definition, Customizing header--> Quotation relevance is 'Initial Sales/Service'. if it is Initial Quotation, transactions will be displayed in Quotation logical link.
    Regards,
    S Reddy

  • Multiple records for a single transaction - Issue in LSMW

    Hi,
    i'm facing a issue in LSMW
    i have the data coming up in the flat file. the data which constitutes the single transaction consists of  data from multiple records from the flat file..
    suppose we have 10 records in the flat file... and all the 10 records related to ony  2 transactions i.e say 6 records to first transaction and next 4 records to next transaction.
    we have a direct input method to handle this data like field1 for first record, field2 for 2nd record and so on...
    while uploading, we will get all the records one by one into our source structure. My question is can we handle this scenario in lsmw? if yes, pls suggest
    Thanks in advance
    Shekhar

    Hi Kris,
    this is regarding the asset creation via AS01..
    we are getting the flat file in that way. Lets assume like this:
    suppose for one transaction we may need to fill 5 depreciation keys and for another option only 3 dep. keys we need to fill.
    then in the flat file, we can get like 5 records for first transaction i.e asset and 3 records for 2nd transaction
    Can we handle this via lsmw
    Regards
    shekhar

Maybe you are looking for

  • WAE FTP and offline Issue

    Hello All, I have really simple question for you. 1>   So once the WAE devices are taken offline ( Disabling WCCP)  è  WAN traffic will continue flow has normal. However the current connections will be lost. Am I right ? è  Also even thought we resta

  • How to handle multiple xmls(schemas) using java

    Can anyone give me solution for the below issue. We are handling five types of xmls(five different xsds) in our application.We have the XML and its XSD in database. Currently we are using JAXB to create and update the xmls. In future there is a chanc

  • WHILE Loop - NEW TO ORACLE & SQL

    I was assigned a task to loop through an organization heirachy drill until a certain a value is reached. What I mean by this is that I have to select three fields from a ORGN table to find the correct ORGN_CODE: ORGN_CODE, ORGN_CODE_PRED, ORGN_ID. I

  • How to make HD images

    So I was making image's on my computer for a friend's wallpaper and was curious as to how I achieve that crisp, sharp, high definition quality? Here's a screenshot of my settings for reference. Thanks

  • "Bloodborne Server Not Found" - What's going on?

    Ever since I have started playing this game, I have never been able to get to play it online and I am not sure why. I have a decent internet connection, a valid PS+Sub and more importantly, I can play multiplayer of all other games that I have, inclu