Cross-company-code billing (Thid party) in FI

Hi,
We have configured SD part for Cross-company-code billing (third party). This process is about delivering products to the customer from one company (company code A) and billing customer from another company (company code B) with intercompany invoice from delivering company to Invoicing company.
Could you help me with FI GL accounting postings that should occur in the process?
We have tested it so far and I think that there are some postings missing. Currently GL potings for this process are:
Delivery from company code A to customer:                 STOCK: Ct, COGS: Dt
Customer invoice from company code B to customer:   Revenue: Ct, Customer: Dt, VAT: Dt
Intercompany postings: in company code A:                 IC Revenue: Ct, Cusomer (comp. code B) Dt
I think there is a document missing in Intercompny on Company code B site. I suppose it should be:
IC expenses Dt, Vendor (comp code A): Ct.
Am I right and if yes - how can I configure this automated postning during IC invoicing on IC vendor site?
Thank you,
Karol
Edited by: Karol on Feb 15, 2010 11:34 PM
Edited by: Karol on Feb 16, 2010 9:42 AM

Dear Neil,
There is a concept in FI to maitain "Automatic Posting Clearing Accounts between Company codes". (Check transaction BUV in TCode OBYA)
After you observe the TCode, you can understand the following draft.
-- One Posting transaction (for example with posting key 86 "GR/IR Debit") is posted against a cost object. Based on the configuration mentioned above, automatically the same transaction will be posted as (96 "GER/IR Credit") in the partner company code against the cost object.
-- The Same GL account acts as Credit GL for one Company code & as a Debit GL for the other, preferably.
Now, if the cost on your WBSE comes in the business process / development cycle test due to these features, & if you want to bill the customer based on these sources, then you need to configure the mentioned scenario with the help of your FI consultant first & can then check RRB process
regards

Similar Messages

CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

Have you considered using this user-exit?
User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
Thanks,
Ben

How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill

Hi All,
Can any one help me, How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill of Exchnage Payments with Automatic Payment Program?
Regards
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
This is what you need to do to configure Cross Company Code Vendor Payments.
Execute transaction code OBYA, when prompted, type in 1st coy code, say A and then 2nd coy code, say B. This would take you to the "Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Clearing Accounts" screen.
In the first frame, where you have
Posted in : A
Cleared Against : B
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
In the second Frame
Posted in : B
Cleared Against : A
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
So, if you are using the Customer/Vendor approach, company A must be set up as both a Customer(Use Txn Code XD01) and a Vendor(USe Txn Code XK01) in Company B and vice versa.
Once you have completed this set-up, you can then use transaction F.13 and/or F13E to carry out your automatic clearing. Alternatively, whenever Payment Run is executed via transaction code F110, this would automatically clear out the payables and receivables in each company code.
However, if you intend to use the G/L approach, then the account numbers would be Inter-coy G/L account for each coy code as defined in the chart of accounts.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Transfer posting of tax in a cross company code transaction thru' RFBUST10

Hi,
I have a doubt regarding using the program RFBUST10 transferring the tax in a cross company transaction.
I have posted an invoice entry as below and I want to transfer the tax posting of 7.00 from company code 1 to company code 2 using the program RFBUST10.
Cr - 31 - 3rd party vendor - total amount of invoice co code 1 - 214.00
Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 co code 1 - C7 (Tax code at 7%)
Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 to co code 2 C7 (Tax code at 7%)
I have successfully posted and the tax amount of 7.00 is also transferred from company code 1 to company code2 but now I have 2 problems:
1) The program (RFBUST10) is permitting to transfer tax for the same cross- company code document multiple times. Please let me know how to track whether the cross company code document is already processed for transfer posting of tax.
2) In the transfer posting document as below ,the tax code in the first line item (clearing account) is defaulted to C0 , I would like to know from where this tax code defaults, I have not maintained the default tax code in the GL master.
Dr - 40 clearing Account 107 - C0 (tax code 0%)
Cr- 50 clearing account 100 - C7(tax code at 7%)
Cr - 50 Tax account 7 C7
Please let me know how to resolve these issues.
Tks
SS

hi venkat sri,
gud day, did you manage to solve the transfer intercompany tax using program RFBUST10? Could you share the solution?
Looking forward for your reply.
Regards,
Jay

Document Splitting Cross Company Code

Hello
In our company we are using business area for internal reporting. For cross company code transaction we have assigned vendor and customer in the configuration. In the document splitting settings for cross company code transaction we did a setting that every company code should have document splitting separately (Split each document in each company code separately.
In this case there should be only one entry in the splitting rule for the item category to be edited - 01100 CC <> CC of leading item.)
We normally received vendor invoice where expense belong to several company code but invoice belong to one company code.
Example Invoice amount 1200
vendor liability in company code SA02
Expense 200 for company code SA02 and 1000 in company code SA03
When we simulate the document in general ledger view, system create 4 line item in company code SA02 one Expense Dr, Vendor Credit and two line item with zero balance. In two line items system showing no business area. We want system to post only two line item and none of the entries should be without business area
Thanks and best regards

Hi
System is simulating the following entries
C>C PK Account Amount
SA02 1 000001 31 311001 T/P - 3rd Party 1,200.00- SAR 4449
SA02 2 000002 40 515011 External Persl-NonOR 200.00 SAR 4449
SA02 3 000003 01 146501 Claims/Bchar,ABB SBA 1,000.00 SAR
SA02 000004 50 999001 BA Clearing A/C 1,000.00- SAR
SA02 000005 40 999001 BA Clearing A/C 1,000.00 SAR 4449
SA03 1 000001 40 515011 External Persl-NonOR 1,000.00 SAR 2880
SA03 2 000002 31 326001 Non T/P - ABB SBA 1,000.00- SAR 2880
Now if you see in company code SA02 for receivable form SA03 system is not deriving the business area and in order to balance this entry by BA system is creating zero balance entry
Thanks and Best Rregards

Cross Company Code purchasing

Hi,
Please help me to concept of Cross Company Code purchasing .
I need a Document regarding this or configuration setting , its requirement from one of our client.
So pls send me some document about the Cross Company Code Transaction.
Thanks
Mukesh

Hi,
Refer to the link given below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/4b9036dfe4b703e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Even when the plants involved in a stock transfer belong to different company codes, you can use conventional methods to transfer the stock:
By transferring the stock between plants in one or two steps
By carrying out a stock transport order without the delivery function via Shipping
By carrying out a stock transport order with the delivery function via Shipping
In these cases, the value of the transfer posting is posted to a company code clearing account in both the issuing and the receiving plants. The stock transfer is posted at the valuation price of the material in the issuing plant.
Stock Transport Order with Delivery Via Shipping and Billing Document/Invoice
You can carry out stock transfers with the delivery and billing function. In this procedure, the stock is transferred in the form of a sale between two plants.
Stock transfers that include deliveries and billing documents/invoices are only possible between plants belonging to different company codes.
If you want to carry out a cross-company-code stock transport order with delivery but without a billing document, you must set the Relevant for Billing (data element FKREL) indicator in Customizing of the item type to "blank" (Not relevant for billing).
When you use the delivery function in Shipping, the whole transaction - from the delivery through billing and invoice verification - is reflected in the system. The following Shipping functions are available for this:
Delivery:
For example, planning shipping activities, picking, packing
Billing:
For example, price determination
Before you can use a stock transport order with the delivery function and a billing document, the plant must be assigned to a vendor. You maintain the vendor - plant assignment in the vendor master record.
If a user enters a vendor when creating a stock transport order, the plant is automatically copied from the vendor master record.
A stock transport order with delivery and billing is a mixture of a standard purchase order and a stock transport order: as in the standard purchase order, when items are entered (standard items with no item category) price determination is carried out and shipping data established; as in the stock transport order, the transfer of stocks from one location to another is monitored.
Stock Transport Order with Valuated and Non-Valuated Sales Order Stock
When entering goods issues for cross-company-code stock transport orders, you can work with both valuated and non-valuated sales order stock (E) using the one-step procedure (movement type 645) and the two-step procedure (movement type 643). In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4) you define from which stock material is to be withdrawn by selecting the Dependent requirements indicator for individual and collective requirements. There are three options:
Indicator set to Blank (individual and collective requirements): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 1 (individual requirements only): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 2 (collective requirements only): material is removed from unrestricted-use standard stock
Prices
In Purchasing, the price of the material in question is determined in the usual manner (from the info record, for example).
In SD, pricing is also carried out as normal during the billing process.
Your company has to maintain settings in the Customizing system determining whether stock transfers between two plants should be with or without billing.
You can also determine whether individual users can carry out stock transfers, for example, with or without billing or in either of the two ways.
If you choose Purchase Order ® Create ® Stock Transfer (i.e. a stock transport order without billing) and stock transfer with billing has been defined for the plants in Customizing, a message appears indicating that you should create a standard purchase order.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.
Edited by: RAVI SHANKAR H.N on Jan 12, 2009 10:45 AM

Stock transport order ("Q" stock, configuration) - cross-company code

We tried to create stock transport order (cross-company code) and consequents documents with
using "Q" stock and material configuration. Unfortunately we have got
1) message M7 146 concerning the special Q stock not supported by the
movement 643., 2) configuration is not taken into delivery type NLCC. Can anyone help?

Hi,
Please follow the below process for stock transport order...
1. Create stock transprot purchage order (ME21N)
2. Create delivery Vl10b or VL01n and then goods issue
3. Inter comapny billing with billing type IV...
Please go to VOV7 there speical stock filed as blank and billing relevance as A...
Regards
sankar

Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

Hi,
My issue is as follows.
Production process spans across 2 company codes.
Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
I would be grateful for any ideas.
Thanks,
Szymon

Hi Udo / Szymon.
I have a question about this issue.
In the sap help about multiple valuations / group costing:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
Could you clarify about this?
thanks!!
Arturo.
Group Valuation
Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

Goods movement accounting in Cross Company Code Sales

Hi everybody,
I´m implementing cross company code sales and i have a question about the goods movement accounting in the selling company.
In the process, the goods are delivered directly to the final customer by the delivering company. These goods never enter to the selling company ( no goods receipt), but the selling company receives the internal billing document for the delivered goods.
Despite the real physical good movement, i need to registrate the goods purchasing in accounting as if goods receipt/issue had taken place in the selling company, because it sells the goods like if they belong to itself.
I ´m not sure if this is possible, i´m near to think that it isn´t, but if anyone knows something....
Thanks very much
Gustavo

Dear Gustavo
Are you aware of POD (Proof of Delivery) concept ??
For more details, please go through these threads
[POD |POD]
[POD activation |POD activation]
[User Exit in Shipping|Re: User Exit in Shipping]
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

Hello Guys,
I have a problem related to cross company code transaction.
In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Rafael B.

Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
The document was created in 2010.
This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
More suggestions?
Regards.
Rafael

Cross company code Stock transfer - Special procurement Key

Hi,
Please clear my following doubts...
1. We have two company codes, Company code: A1 having a Plant: AP1, Company code B1- Pant BP1,
Finished goods sold from the plant AP1 are purchased from the plant BP1, so is there is any possibility to create a special procurement key having BP1 as the delivering plant and assign the key in AP1 materials.
2. Can i combine the two plants AP1 and BP1 for total online planning (MD01) by creating a scope of planning indicator? and run a single MRP run for both plants at a time...
Please clarify...
Thanks,
JK

JK,
I dont think Scope Planning is problem. You can create Scope of planning combining multiple plants, use transaction OM0E.
I doubt on Special procurement key option for STO across cross company codes, as the special setting needed in that case would be that Plant as to be created as Vendor / Customer. I would suggest to post this to MM forum for further response on this.
Regards,
Prasobh

F-02 Docment posted for cross company code TAX

Dear Experts ,
Can you please explain me ,
when i posted docment in F-02 for cross company code postings that is Dr for 1150 company code and credit for 5500 company code ,
1] i need to enter tax code is YY is same to both company codes 1150 & 5500
] i need to enter tax jurisdiction code for company code 1150 is 1254693 and company code 5500 is 4525658
when i enter these two Tax jurisdiction code system shows error when i saved error message # FF 744
ERROR MESSAGE BELOW
[ The jurisdiction codes entered on the individual line items have different controls for determinating the cash discount base amount (upper level and ).
This is not allowed within a document.
Procedure
Please correct the entered jurisdiction code (if not correct) or if need be, post the transaction to two single documents.
Can you please help me how i enter postings in F-02
Regards
Bhaskar

Thanks

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Automatically clear the open items for a GL account cross company codes

Hi FICO experts,
Can anyone help me on the following issue urgently?
There are journal entries posted to same GL account with different company code. Is there any way to automatically clear the open items sitting in the GL account in company code A to against the open items for the same GL account in company code B.
The example is below:
Journal in company code A
Dr. 840410      $100
Cr. 111300       $100
Journal in company code B
Dr. 111301   $100
Cr. 840410      $100
Now I want to automatically clear account 840410 by using assignment or text in the journal entry.
It will be highly appreciated for any instructions.
Adele

Hello Adele Wang,
You can enter cross-company code transactions in one step in the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable application components. This function would be used, for example, for centralized procurement or payment.
Integration:For centralized payments, each individual company code enters its own invoices separately, while a central company code pays them. When you are clearing open items, the system makes clearing entries between the company codes participating in the clearing procedure. These clearing entries represent the receivables and payables that exist between the company codes in centralized payment.
Prerequisites:You have specified which company codes are to be processed via a single company code. In this specification, you can distinguish between clearing transactions. You can therefore have different combinations of company codes for incoming and outgoing payments.
You have specified the clearing accounts that record the receivables and payables between the individual company codes. The system posts to these accounts automatically when clearing the open items.
You need to make the required settings in the activity Prepare Cross-Company Code Manual Payments in Customizing for Financial Accounting (Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Payments->Manual Outgoing Payments).
Features:For each company code, the system generates a separate clearing document. A joint transaction number marks these documents as belonging together.
Example:For a clearing transaction (incoming payment, outgoing payment), you have agreed in Customizing that if company code 0001 is specified, open items are also selected from other company codes (0002 and 0003).
Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points.
Rgds
manish
Clearing can then also be carried out if the account to be cleared has not been created in company code 0001. As long as no items have to be posted to this account in company code 0001, it is not necessary to create a master record for the account in company code 0001.
See also:

Cross-company-code billing (Thid party) in FI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for