Cross-Company Under Tolerance Write-Off

Hi FI Gurus,
I having some issues with regards to clearing Intercompany Invoices when they are within tolerance using F-28.
Scenario
Incoming Payments are coming in company code X and the customer invoices being cleared belong to company code X and Y.
The tolerance is 1$. So if the payment difference (Difference between the Total Amount of the Invoices and the Payment Amount) is within the tolerance the system clears them but splits the difference amount across the company codes. Like if the difference is 99cents it is putting 98cents in X and 1 cent in Y.
Can you please let me know if there is some config we need to do just to put it under one company code preferably in X(where the payment came in) ?
Regards,
Ashu

Hi,
1) AIAB - Distribute (update a rule with G/L settlement with a GL account for 100%)
AIBU - Settle (Execute settlement)
Or
2)
Posting direct FI entry.
FB01
Debit 40 posting key GL expenses to which you write off,
Credit 75 posting key Asset #
Best Regards,
Madhu

Similar Messages

Write off asset under construction

we have one AUC, we have create a PO for this AUC, the AUC has amount of 200K USD, we haven't transfer it to fixed assets, how to write off the AUC, (we want to completely write off this AUC, because the company code which creates this AUC going bankruptcy), I tried ABAON, ABAVN, but this is specific to asset, asset under construction can't be used. any idea? thanks

Hi,
1) AIAB - Distribute (update a rule with G/L settlement with a GL account for 100%)
AIBU - Settle (Execute settlement)
Or
2)
Posting direct FI entry.
FB01
Debit 40 posting key GL expenses to which you write off,
Credit 75 posting key Asset #
Best Regards,
Madhu

Does R12 Oracle AR Automatic Write Off support cross currencies receipt?

Dear all,
In R12, if the invoice is in USD and the receipt is in GBP, can the automatic write off function support cross currency receipt?
HY

Hi,
not understanding customized installation instructions , customized means tailored by user , what does the meaning of customized context here?Some times before patching you need to back some custom files and/or customization done to some files.
Using PAA, You can put these custom instructions.
You said "when you run adpatch with preinstall=y, it checks if all the pre-requistes are met or not" but the same from above link says.You are right, the preinstall=y is used "during an upgrade or consolidated update".
Pre-install Mode
Pre-install mode is generally used during the upgrade process to update AD utilities,
apply family consolidated upgrade patches, or work around other patching issues.
AutoPatch asks all startup questions except those relating to the database.
To run AutoPatch in pre-install mode, include preinstall=y on the AutoPatch command
line. It performs the following actions:
■ Compares version numbers.
■ Copies files.
■ Relinks FND and AD executables.
■ Saves patch information to the file system.
It compares vesion numbers, meaning checks for pre-req and does the required copying.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B34956_01/current/acrobat/oa_patching_r12.pdf
Thanks

Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

Hi
I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
Please.......... help me to resolve.
i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
Thanks
Rekha

1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
there you can give the company code and vendor account.
2. Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
Rgds
Murali. N

Questions on Inter-company and Cross-company sales ordering process..

Hi,
I understood the delivery plant and the sales org. is not in the same company code might be the process, but i want to know some details especially in SAP system how it is realized and processed, hope could kindly help me on below questions!! thanks!!
1)what is the difference between inter-company sales and Cross-company sales??
2)What is the general document flow and config. when in below 2 cases:
Suppose the 2 company code under same sap client system, then what kinds of company code,plant config within the system for inter-compan and cross-company, and finally what kind of document flow will it be in the system.
Suppose the 2 company code is under diff sap system, then what kind of doc flow in each sap system for inter-company and cross-company sales process???
Thank you very much!!!!

Hi,
Basically there are totally Three types of scenarios
1. Intra Compnay Stock Transport Order
In this type of scenario, the stock is transfered between Two Plants which are under the same Compnay Code. The document type used here is UB. Here in this scenario the owner ship on the stock is not changed thats way there will not be any Invoice. The process as follows
a. Create Purchase Order with document type UB - ME21N
b. Create Replenishment Delivery with Document type NL - VL10B
c. Picking and PGI - VL02N
Now stock will be shown in Transit, you can check this using T.Code MB5T.
d. Do MIGO to receive the stock into ordering plant.
2. Inter Compnay Stock Transport Order
This is called as Cross Compnay STO. Here the stock is sent from one plant to another plant which are in two different Compnay codes. That means the Ownership on the stock is changed in this scenario, that way there will be Intercompnay Invoice IV is reaised. Here the stock is just moved to one plant to another plant but not to any customer.
The Process is as follows
a. Create a PO using type NB - ME21N
b. Create a Cross Compnay Replenishment delivery using type NLCC - VL10B
c. Picking and PGI in VL02N
d. Inter Compnay Invoice IV is raised by Supplying Compnay code to the Ordering Compnay Code - VF01
for this a customer created in Supplying Compnay who represents the Ordering Compnay and the invoice is raised against to that customer.
e. MIGO to receive the stock in Ordering Plant
f. MIRO to do invoice verification and do Vendor account update. This also can be done by EDI triggering, to update the Vendor Account. That means with this step, ordering compnay will update into its vendor account that he has to give certain amount to the compnay who supplied the stock.
3. Inter Compnay Customer Sales
This is similer to the 2 process, but here instead of sending to Plant we will send the stock directly to Customer of other compnay code.
The process is as follows
a. Customer raises normal sales order in another compnay code of type OR - VA01
b. But if the plant of that compnay does not have stock, then in the order the plant is changed to other compnay code plant.
c. Delivery is created in supplying Compnay against this Order - VL01
d. Picking and PGI is done - VL02N
e. But the stock is sent direclty to customer from supplying plant.
f. Ordering compnay will raise normal invoice F2 to the customer
g. Supplying Compnay will raise Intercompnay invoice IV to the Ordering Compnay.
But for all these process there are some configurations can be done, like
the material should be extended to both the plants
a customer is created in supplying plant who represents the ordering plant so that IV can be generated to that customer.
Supplying Plants should be linked to ordering Sales Org and Distribution channel. etc.
Hope this is clear.
Thanks
Praveen

Issues on cross-company stock transfer triggered by sales order

Hi, friends:
As our business process required, we need to make the cross-company sale between to plants under two company codes.
The business process required is different from standard inter-company billing in SAP SD module. Our business process is as follows:
sales order --> PR --> PO --> cross-company stock transfer --> delivery to customer --> billing.
However, there is a difficulty in this process of make-to-stock production method. When we use schedule line item in SO to trigger the PO, there is a must to assign "account assignment category" in PO. This indicator is unchangable in PO by manual. When post goods recepit against the PO, there is no stock quantity udpate in un-restricted stock. By the way, I selected "C" in the "account assignment category" of schedule line item cofiguration.
Checked the MM documents, I found it seemed like only two results of PGR against PO with account assignment category. One result of PGR is directly consumpted by receiptent or unloading point. The other result of PGR is updating sepecial stock. For example, I've fullfilled the process for make-to-order production method, the stocks are specified for sales order.
In our requiremnt, we have to post to normal un-restricted stock for the following ATP in sales order.
Could any friend give some suggestion on this issue?
Thanks!
Justin

Hi, Venkadesh:
I've checked the Purchasing view and quantity/value update in both plants of different company codes. That's correctly configured.
In the business process, the quantity in normal un-restricted stock updating still doesn't work.
Do you mean that as follows: if select any indicator in "account assignment category", we have to use UNBW or NLAG material type in the purchase order?
I have successfully fullfilled the process in make-to-order sales order, with material type FERT and account assignment category "E". The account assignmnet categroy is obligatory in sales order schedlue line item configuration, which is to trigger PO by SO. The configuration path is as below:
IMG>Sales and Distribution>Sales>Sales Documents>Schedule Lines-->Define Schedule Line Categories
If possible, would make a test in your system to check how to fullfill the process with make-to-stock sales order, FERT material?
Thanks!
Justin

How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill

Hi All,
Can any one help me, How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill of Exchnage Payments with Automatic Payment Program?
Regards
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
This is what you need to do to configure Cross Company Code Vendor Payments.
Execute transaction code OBYA, when prompted, type in 1st coy code, say A and then 2nd coy code, say B. This would take you to the "Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Clearing Accounts" screen.
In the first frame, where you have
Posted in : A
Cleared Against : B
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
In the second Frame
Posted in : B
Cleared Against : A
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
So, if you are using the Customer/Vendor approach, company A must be set up as both a Customer(Use Txn Code XD01) and a Vendor(USe Txn Code XK01) in Company B and vice versa.
Once you have completed this set-up, you can then use transaction F.13 and/or F13E to carry out your automatic clearing. Alternatively, whenever Payment Run is executed via transaction code F110, this would automatically clear out the payables and receivables in each company code.
However, if you intend to use the G/L approach, then the account numbers would be Inter-coy G/L account for each coy code as defined in the chart of accounts.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Cross company code transaction in cash journal

Hi,
Is it possible to do cross company code transactions in cash journal ?
Eg:
i want to make a payment ,from cash journal of cocd 1000 to cocd5000.
i should book the payment only thro cash journal .
Regards
Guru

Hi Guys,
No cross company code transactions can be made thru CJ. Reason being, CJ is created under a company code & generally related to a specific BA and handles petty cash. But u r not using BA.
So we cannot post corss company code transactions in CJ
Regards,
Ajay

Cross company payment

HI Experts,
In My company Business wants the follwing secnorio, could any one can help me in this.
Under one company we have 7 co.codes (all are located in different countries), when we purchasing the goods from one vendor(xx) for all the co.codes using different purchase orders.
for example the supplier has issued invoice number 123 in the amount of 1,000,000 with the following purchase order references:
Co.Code       Amount
1000             500,000
3000     374,400
5000     125,600
Total             1,000,000
Currently, because of the system set up wherein purchase orders assigned under a specific company codes is not possible to be posted on a different company code. Hence, our processors end up posting the same invoice in 3 parts. Likewise, payment applications were done as well in 3 parts, in this example
if the abovementioned example is possible to be posted and paid via one document number (some sort of cross company posting).
All three co.codes are in different countries (Co.Code currency is differ) but using same fiscal year Variant and same chart of accounts and same controlling area. One Group currency.
Regards,
suda

you said you are having different POs to diff Comp codes and each PO has its unique reference so how is it possible that the invoice is posted in total. its not going to happen .
but on the controlling side you can post them through allocations

Version 4.6c Cross Company Code Incoming payment to lockbox.

In version 4.6c I am trying to find out the correct IMG configuration for processing incoming payments to a lockbox when multiple companies are using one company for banking. Here is what I have done so far:
Here are the company codes: 2100 has house banks and lockbox set up.
0980 does not have house bank or lockbox.
OX16 - all both company codes involved are assigned to the same Company.
OBVU - Non-bank company code 0980 has 2100 set up as Paying Company Code
OBYA - Clearing accounts have been set up between 0980-2100.
OB05 - Accounting Clerk has been set up for both company codes.
OB10 - Lockbox from 2100 has been set up for 0980. Even though 0980 does not have a House bank set up, IMG Configuration did allow the lockbox and house bank for 2100 to be saved under 0980.
OB96 - Forms to be used were linked to 0980
One issue we are having is that when we attempt to set up a Customer for 0980 a field for Lockbox is required to be entered. When the 2100 Lockbox is input, an error message pops up saying that 0980 does not have a House Bank.
Can someone please explain how to complete the configuration for this type of activity in version 4.6c? Also should we be using F-28, FB05 or some other t-code to post incoming payments.

Hello,
You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
The system will post three document.
Document 1 in First Company Code
Document 2 in Second Company Code
and
Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
Please let me know in case if you need further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Cross Company Code Incoming Payment Clearing

Dear All
Good day to you.
I would be grateful if I could get advice on the following:
Process:
Company Code A is receiving Payment from Customer Z of Company Code B
Present SAP Treatment
F-02 Company Code A Bank Account is debited and Customer Z of Company Code B is credited.
F-32 Customer Z's Invoice of Company Code B cleared against the Payment received by Company Code A.
Hence this has become a two step process.
Ideal solution needed
In F-28 or similar other transaction
Company Code A Bank Account is debited and Customer Z of Company Code B is credited and clearing also carried out then and there?
To achieve the ideal solution above what are the configurations (if any) needed.
Thanking you in advance.
Regards
Siddique

Hello,
You can post the cross company code postings even between two controlling areas. The system does not prevent to post documents between two company codes in two controlling area. Need not necessarily they should be under one operating concern. Provided you have to make sure that you have followed the following points:
In OBY6 - To company codes must be assigned to same Company, meaning that you mus thave created a Company and that company must have been assigned to these two company codes.
OBYA - You should maintain the clearing accounts in both the company codes. Meaning that you are posting one leg in one company code and the other leg in the other company. Therefore, it is required to have the missing legs in each company code.
Company Code1 - Posting Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code1 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Positng Key 40 - Clearing Account
Company Code2 - Posting Key 50 - Clearing Account
OB08 - In case if the two company codes have different local (company code) currencies, you may maintain the exchange rates.
You can now go to F-02 and post a cross company code transaction giving the first leg in first company code and the second leg in second company code. Missing leg in the first company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA and the missing leg in the second company code will be posted to the GL Account mentioned in OBYA. That means you will have four line items overall.
The system will post three document.
Document 1 in First Company Code
Document 2 in Second Company Code
and
Document3 - Cross Company Code Document.
The cross company code document consists of the first company code document number plus company code plus last two digits of the fiscal year.
Hope this must have clarified your doubts.
Please let me know in case if you need further details.
Thanks,
Ravi

Document splitting error in cross company code invoice

Hi
I am trying to post an invoice through FB60 which is belong to multiple company code.
while simulating the document, system is not able to find the cost object (profit centre) for vendor line item. following is the detail of the transaction:-
Trasnaction Code - FB60
Vendor (co code 1000) - Cr     10000
Exp       (co code 1000) - Dr               5000
Exp       (co code 2000) - Dr               5000
Customization detail -
Item category for vendor reconciliation a/c -           03000
item cateogry for inter company clearing a/c -        01000
item cateogry for inter company customer a/c -      02000
Business Trasaction for document type (IC) used in FB60 - 0000. In document type IC i have allowed intercompany trnaction.
can anybody revert where i am missing the configuration. what additional i need to do to get out this error.
please revert
Regards
DD

Hello,
I also faced similar problem with posting cross company transacation whereby one of the document containing another Customer/Vendor line item which is not the intercompany clearing account. Both the additional Vendor/Customer and the Intercompany Vendor/Customer line items failed to derive the Profit Center information from the offsetting line items. The system recognize the Customer/Vendor line items (additional and Intercompany clearing) as "Leading Items" instead of derivating.
The journal looks like below.
CoCd A
dr. GL Account        [PC-A]   100
cr. ICT Vendor-B                   (100)   --> successfully deriving the [PC-A] information
CoCd B
dr. ICT Customer-A                  100      --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
cr. Customer                         (100)   --> recognized as "Leading item", failed to derive PC-B
dr. GL Account       [PC-B]    100
cr. GL Account       [PC-B]    (100)
The GL Account in CoCd B are registered under Item Category "01000" and it has been registered as the splitting base item for the "ICT Customer-A" and "Cusomer" accounts.
Would really appreciate your kind help or suggestion to solve this issue.
Thanks a lot in adavance!
Regards,
Nurul F

AP Accrual write off

Hi,
Kindly help to me to understand under what situation we need to write-off the AP accrual ?
Wouldn't we want to accrue all univoiced Receipts ?
Thanks

Here are some resons:
1. What PO warehouse has received may not be the one finance/accounting has invoiced. Hence you PO remains open as if it is not invoiced.
2.Sometimes finance may invoice without matching and pay vendor.Hence vendor may not question and procurement is also not questioning because they have received material.
3. Lot of times finance creates invoice for freight with accrual account with no reference to PO.this gets qualified for writeoff.
4.Invoicing for more quantity than what has been recvd. On the similar note invoicing in advance but never received.
Actually if you look at the reasons for the accrual build up you will find answers.
HTH
Nagamohan

Tax Apportionment for Cross-Company Code

how can 'business area' be inherited from the source FI documents
which are generated by cross-company transaction?.for example:
company code D/C account business area amount
1000 D expense 1000 1000
1000 D tax 234
1000 C vendor 1000 2234
1000 D clearingA 1000 1000
2000 D expense 2000 1000
2000 C clearingB 2000 1000
after running 'rfbust10',i want the document will be like that:
company code D/C account business area amount
1000 c tax 1000 117
1000 D clearing 1000 1000
1000 C clearing 1000 883
2000 D tax 2000 117
2000 c clearing 2000 117

Hi,
In IMG under
Financial Accounting -> Preparations for Consolidation -> Business Area Consolidation -> Materials Management -> Assign Division/Valuation Area to Business Area
Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Sales and Distribution -> Assign Business Area to Plant and Division
Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Sales and Distribution -> Assign Business Area by Sales Area
Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Account Assignment/Costing -> Business Area Account Assignment -> Assign Business Area to Plant and Division
Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Account Assignment/Costing -> Business Area Account Assignment -> Assign Business Area by Sales Area
Regards,
Naveen.

Cross-Company Under Tolerance Write-Off

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for