Cross Day work issue in Time Evaluation for positive recording.

Dear Experts,
We would like to know whether anyone else has faced the below described issue before or has any suggestions for the same.
Issue Background: We are uploading time events from the clocking recording system into SAP using an interface program. The clocking events are loaded without indicator 'M' and based on whether they belong to current day then assignment is '=' and '<' for previous day assignment.
Issue Description: Some operational staff have planned daily shifts from 00:00 - 08:30. Hence they can clock-in before 00:00 on the previous day and since there is no 'Next Day Indicator' in SAP, we split the time events so that if the clock-in is at 23:00 previous day then the time pairs are formed as
23:00 - 24:00 Current Day with Day assignment '='
00:00 - 08:30 Next Day with Day assignment '='
When we run the time evaluation, the day assignment for Next day pair 00:00 - 08:30 is automatically changed to '<'. This makes the Next day without any events and the time evaluation throws error in the next day.
Now instead of automatic upload, if we manually upload the same time events, the records are as follows:
23:00 - 24:00 Current Day with Day Assignment '+' and Origin Indicator 'M'
00:00 - 08:30 Next Day with Day Assignment '+' and Origin Indicator 'M'
Now if we execute time evaluation, the behaviour is as per expected and the time evaluation doesn't change the day assignment for any records.
Work Around Proposed: Keep atleast 1 sec difference between the time events say the above records can be uploaded as follows:
23:00 - 23:59 Current Day with Day assignment '='
00:00 - 08:30 Next Day with Day assignment '='
But we would like to avoid this if possible.
Summary: In brief we would like to know whether why time evaluation has different processing for Origin indicator 'M' and SPACE.
Many thanks for your inputs in advance, thanks.
Regards,
Roshan.

Hi,
see thread
Time evaluation -early clockin for shifts starting at midnight ?
maybe of interest
bg
Edited by: bg on Sep 16, 2010 9:26 AM

Similar Messages

Problem: Run Time Evaluation for Future Period

Hi SAP Gurus, can someone help me solving this problem:
My client need to run time evaluation for 2-months period ahead of time. But every time I tried, time evaluation always stops at end of the current month, no further dates in the future. I had created attendance data 2002 for all the future dates. IT7, 2002, 2006 and all configurations seem to be OK (T510S,T569R). Test run is also OK with good future results. What could possibly be missing? Thank you in advance.
Bill

Thank you very much, Arun, Banu, Stefan and Om.
Yes, I have entered the "Evaluation up to" date (60 days later);
The schema has a function "Check FUT".
Test future run result was generated correctly.
Still I can't have future results in real run.
So, what else I should check into?
Thanks again.
Bill

Unable to run time evaluation for the entire year...

hi experts,
I'am unable to run time evaluation for the entire year, even though mentioned the date as Force calculation as of : 01.01.2010
and evaluation upto date : 31.12.2010. when time evaluation is run , the log is only run for Jan 2010.
Maintained IT2011 from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2010
IT0050 from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.9999
IT0003 : PDC recalculation : 01.01.2010
Kindly advise.
Regards
Pammi

Check if Time Management status is 1 or 9....
If it is 1 then it would not run for the entire year..It would run only till today. If it is 9, then the TE runs for future also...also check if in the schema it is activated for future runs or not...

Time Evaluation for work schedule during midnight

Dear all SAP HR Expert,
We have question regarding time evaluation.
Our scenario is:
Shift 1 00:00 - 07:00
Shift 2 07:00 - 16:00
Shift 3 16:00 - 24:00
His work schedule:
06.08.2010: Shift 2
07.08.2010: Day Off (Free)
08.08.2010: Shift 1
09.08.2010: Shift 1
10.08.2010: Shift 1, but he took one day annual leave on this day
Actual data (in IT2011 and IT2001):
clock in 06:30 of 06.08.2010
clock out 16:30 of 06.08.2010
clock in 23:30 of 07.08.2010 (come earlier)
clock out 07:30 of 08.08.2010
clock in 00:35 of 09.08.2010 (late)
clock out 07:15 of 09.08.2010
leave record: start date: 10.08.2010, edn date: 10.08.2010
Base on SAP documentation that said we can never assign a time event before midnight to the next day, we have rearranged SAP configuration (DWS and PWS) to:
DWS:
Shift 1: 23:59 - 06:59 with tolerance 23:59 - 00:00 and 06:59 - 07:00
PWS:
For Shift 1, always set 1 day earlier than actual schedule.
Thus, work schedule rule will indicate:
06.08.2010: Shift 2
07.08.2010: Shift 1 23:59 - 06:59
08.08.2010: Shift 1 23:59 - 06:59
09.08.2010: Shift 1 23:59 - 06:59
It works!!
Our problem is, time eval can not find clock in - clock out record for date 09.08.2010 (because record in IT2011 with date 09.08.2010 belongs to 08.08.2010) and can not match it with leave record (because leave data has start date 10.08.2010).
Thus, time eval will generate warning message "Employee not at work".
I hope you can give me input on how to solve this problem.
Best Regrads,
Achmad

Hi,
see thread
Time evaluation -early clockin for shifts starting at midnight ?
maybe of interest
bg
Edited by: bg on Sep 16, 2010 9:26 AM

Time Constraint for Position A012 Relationship

Our organization's structure is such that one position may manage more than one organizational unit. The time contstraint for A012 relationship for positions is currently set to 2, which appears to be restricting me from establishing a position as chief for more than one subordinate org units. In our test environment I changed the constraint to 3 and now am able to have a position as chief of multiple org units. Have I created any potential problems (i.e. with workflow) by changing the A012 time contraint?
Thanks for any advice,
- Lora

Not that I am aware of. In the situation of having the time constraint is the when certain program uses evaluation path, it doesn't know which one of the path to pick since there are more than one path presented.
In the case of workflow, usually it will go to all of them. The first one that open the task owns the task.
But in the case of A012, it should be okay. There are situation where the chief relationship will be towards more than one organizational unit. Where his position belongs to is a different story. As where his position belongs to for the org unit defines who is his/her reviewer for performance and compensation. But he could have as many A012/B012 to manages all those org units as he wishes.

Daylight savings all-day events issues in updated iCal for iPad

After purchasing new MBP, Genius Bar told me to update to new iCal. I have noticed that any all-day events taking place on the date that daylight savings begins (3/13/11 i.e.) lasts on iPad's iCal for two days. When I attempt to edit, event still displays for two days. Guessing it is because that day technically lasts for only 23 hours. Genius Bar consultant had no suggestions for a remedy. This error appears for 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 daylight savings beginning dates. The error doesn't seem to be a problem for the MBP or my iPhone.

I've experienced the same problem. I set up a recurring one day event on the first of each month - come April 1 in 2012 the event is spread over 2 days (the end of daylight savings time in Australia) from April onwards. I can muck around with the event and have it set at one day from April1 onwards in 2012 but there's a recurring event bug related to daylight savings. I wonder if any alarms people have set for that day will again experience the problems from the past?

Issues in TIME OUT for Dynamic Queues- Using IBM MQ Client

Hi
I have an issue with Dynamic queues. I am using IBM websphere as my Mesaging server and IBM MQ client. I need to send a request to a static queue and then wait for a response for a specified duration(in my case it is 100 millisecs) in the corresponding dynamic queue.But what I found out that in some cases, I got response even after 100 ms !!!! Here's my code. Is there anything wrong going on somewhere???
com.ibm.mq.jms.MQTemporaryQueue replyToQueue = com.ibm.mq.jms.MQTemporaryQueue)queueSession.createTemporaryQueue();
replyToQueue.setTargetClient(JMSC.MQJMS_CLIENT_JMS_COMPLIANT);
requestMsg.setJMSReplyTo(replyToQueue);
long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
queueSender.send(requestMsg);
queueReceiver = queueSession.createReceiver(replyToQueue);
queueConnection.start();
m = queueReceiver.receive(100);
long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
if(m != null){
System.out.println("Response Time: " + (t2 - t1) + " ms");}
I have left out the queueSession and queueSender piece of code here.
Anyways, I found 1 response in 122 ms and another in 128 ms. Can anyone throw some light as to why and how this is happening?

Don't run from the client ... run from the server
or
if running from a client use the built-in DBMS_DATAPUMP package's API.
http://www.morganslibrary.org/reference/pkgs/dbms_datapump.html

HT201066 Does the screen record function work with quick time pro for windows?

I am looking at purchasing QuickTime Pro for Winodiws (yes I will be getting a mac soon...) and I was wondering if the screen recorder function that is with quick time on macs is still available on windows?

Screen recording is part of QuickTime X, not QuickTime Pro. QuickTime X is only available for Macs.
(83582)

I can not burn CD's with my Itunes anymore. It tells me I am missing CD burner and to re download ITunes. I have done that and it stills does not work. Every time I try, Disc Recorder not found keeps coming up! Please someone help me!!!

I can not burn a CD with my itunes anymore. It tells me to re download itunes. I have done that and still have the same problem. When I do try, Missing disc recorder keeps coming up. Please help!!!!

Hello again, Stew.
Also when I open itunes it gives me a warning and says "The registry settings used by the itunes drivers for importingand burning cd's and dvds are missing. Please reinstall itunes."
With that one let's first try a reboot and repair.
Reboot the PC (very important), and the do a *repair install* of iTunes.
Go to your "Add or Remove Programs" control panel, select iTunes, click "Change" and then click "Repair".
Does iTunes launch without the error message now?
If no luck there, try checking for a device filter conflict in your registry:
iTunes for Windows XP: Troubleshooting CD issues caused by device filters

How to prevent Time Evaluation to run for past date?

Dear Friends,
I have a problem with Time evaluation issue.
While time evaluation runs with PDC recalculation date in 2010 its creating two different quota for an absence.
So client donu2019t want to run time evaluation for before 31.12.2010.
Please let me know how to do this.
They donu2019t want to used earliest recalculation date filed for this purposes.
Thanks and in advance,
Anoop

Hi,
They want to use Earliest personal recalculation date for monthy locking.

Find the day in rule (Time Evaluation)

Hi All,
How to get the day of current day in a rule (Time Evaluation)? The result should represents Mon, Tue, Wed,...
Thanks.
Edited by: a_irawan on Sep 3, 2009 7:44 AM

Hi,
VARSTWEDAY Relative weekday
same youcan check in TD03
Reagrds
Sri

Attendance type in time evaluation

Hi All,
Need solutions for the below issues.
1) Clock in and clock out information for an employee is stored in SAP in IT2011, if clock in or clock out information is missing for an employee it should trigger a mail to employee and his manager.
2) Currently using one attendance type : On duty would be raised by employee when is on business trip. System should consider this as working.
During time evaluation it should consider if any attendance type and clock in and clock out details for an employee. and generate the absence quotas.
There is no integration with payroll.
3) If the accumulated earned leaves cross 90 days, rest of the leaves to be encashed, is there any standard sap solution for this or need to write a PCR or custom development to be done.
Please let me know ho to do.
Regards
Vish

1. The TD20 PCR in time schema evaluates time pairs and errors out if times are missing. The errors are stored in the FEHLER table. Maybe you can write a custom program to read this table and send messages.
2. The On duty will be entered in IT2002 I guess. The positive TE schema will read both IT2011 and IT2002 and so should not be a problem.
3. You need to write a PCR to accomplish this. There are useful doc on this forum. This doc by Vivek is very helpful:
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-55755
Regards
Pramod

Use of Time Evaluation to generate Absence Quota

Hi,
We are planning to use time evaluation to generate absence quota. At the moment we are using RPTQTA00 report to generate Absence Quota. We have negative time management and since, the project has already gone live i have very limited scope to change the basic settings for example we do not have any employee subgroup to identify part time employees, PT & FT are in one employee sub-groups. We have only one ESG & PSG for time recording, time quota etc. The base entitlement is defined for the FT employees and it is reduced propertionately based on the employement percentage in IT0007. Now we are going to adopt a change in design, and planning to have specific work-schedule for PT employees. In that case, we will not have the scope to maintain %age in IT0007 for part time employees but exact no of working hours will be used. It means that system will treat the PT emploees as FT while generating absence quota and output the FT absence entitlement. As i said earlier we can not differentiate PT employees from FT employees based on ESG or PSG, i can not create a separate quota selection rule for part time employees. Hence, we are moving from running RPTQTA00 report to time evaluation for absence quota generation purpose.
Now can anybody please help finding a alternate solution for the above, if it is possible to do it through report RPTQTA00 or we have to adopt the time evaluation. In case we are going to generate absence quota through time evaluation, can we only generate absence quota and skip anything that is related to payroll.
Any comments/suggestion/advise will be very helpful to us.
Thanks.
Sujit

We are not able to generate absence quota for part-time employees as when we do that, system is treating PT employees as FT employees and the FT base entitlement is referred while calculating absence quota. i can not define separate absence entitlement for PT employees as we have only one ESG and PSG, and based on this quota selection group is defined. The QUOMO feature is defined based on work contract - employee sub-group (there is no separate emp sub-group for PT employees) - Pay Scale Group. We are having this problem as we have specific work schedule for PT employees now (Ex. we create 3 days work schedule with 15 hours: 4.5,4.5, 6 hours) and we are not maintaining employement percentage for them. So system is treating PT employee as FT employee with 100% employement percentage. Please let me know if you need any specific info to understand my issue.
Thank you so much for the response.

Time Evaluation Schemas

Hi All
Please suggest me regarding Time Evaluation Schemas.
We have schemas like TQTA, TM04, TM00 Etc. when we use PT60.
What are the different uses of these schemas & what are the situations when we need to use these schemas.
Which schema to use when & where?
Please Suggest
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
TQTA: Generate Absence Quotas only, wtih this schema, we can update the IT2006. Time managemetn status is 7.
TM04: Time Evaluation Without Clock Times, Time managemetn status is 9 or 1 in 0007IT
TM00:Time Evaluation with Personnel Time Events/with clock times. Time managemetn status is 1 in 0007.
For both TM04, TM00 schemas we are using the one T,code that is PT60. THis PT60 t.code create through RPTIME00 program.
Schema TM00 processes time events that have been recorded at a time
recording terminal, or the time pairs formed from the time events in
pair formation. Attendances and absences are also imported.
Schema TM00 is based on positive recording of time data, that is,
recording all times that count as working time (actual times).
Schema TM00 only evaluates time data with clock times (or full-day
records). The main task of schema TM00 is to classify the actual times
by comparing them to the planned specifications in the daily work
schedule (start and end of planned working time, core times, breaks, and
so on).
The time worked by the employee is recorded in the Attendances infotype
(2002), and not as clock-in and clock-out times. When processing
clock-in/out times, the emphasis is on the length of time between the
postings and not on the times at which the postings were made.
You can use schema TM04 to process attendances and absences that specify
a number of hours only, rather than concrete start and end times.
The times stipulated in the daily work schedule are not relevant. Only
specifications such as planned hours and minimum daily working time are
evaluated from the daily work schedule.
TM04 caters both for negative time recording (recording of exceptions to
the work schedule) and positive time recording (recording all
attendances or actual times).
If negative recording is used, the planned hours are generated on the
basis of the daily work schedule. Recorded absences and some attendance
times are deducted (see schema TP01.)
The "Time Management status" indicator in the Planned Working Time
infotype (0007) shows whether all actual times are recorded for an
employee, or only exceptions to the planned specifications.
You can use schema TQTA to accrue absence quotas automatically in time
evaluation. The functionality is limited to the task of generating
quotas, that is, time balances or time wage types are not formed.
The schema is designed for employees who do not normally participate in
the daily time evaluation for the purposes of managing time accounts or
forming wage types. Using schema TQTA to determine absence entitlements
has the following advantages:
o   Quotas can be recalculated flexibly.
o   The need for a recalculation is recognized automatically.
o   Processing is carried out for every day in the period, leaving no
    gaps.
We have schemas like TQTA, TM04, TM00 Etc. when we use PT60.
Regards
Devi.

Time Evaluation Re Run in Mid Month & Mid Mont Initialization !

Hi There,
i was trying to run Time evaluation for the period 01.04.2011 to 31/12/2011.
from April, that is 01.04.4011 to 30.06.2011 Time evaluation was good, now time evaluation has to run from 01.07.2011 but time evaluation has repeated from 12.06.2011 to 11.07.2011 as Initialization period 07/2011, and the same scenario is repeated for the rest of the year..all periods are initiated on 12th of each month from 6th month that is 12.06.2011.
i was been trying to rectify this issue but was not bale to solve it, could any one please look in to it and let me know how to solve it?
your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Kumar

Can you please regenerate Period Parameters for 2011 year in T-Code for OG00 for period parameter 01 and then give the hire date in the field Forced Recalculation as of run in PT60 and run the time evaluation.
Best Regards,

Cross Day work issue in Time Evaluation for positive recording.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for