Cross System flow WITHOUT APO

Hi
has anyone experience of implementing "Cross system flow of goods" WITHOUT APO ? The SAP Help for 'without APO' has 'page not found' since 4.7 which implies this is no longer offered.  There are plenty of OSS fixes for the solution with APO which again implies this option is not possible without APO.
regards
Irene

Hi,
and thanks for looking into this.
No, I do not have an APO (company is using JDA/manugisitcs) and I want to set up cross system STO between two ECC 6.0 systems directly.
I do have a number of idocs running between the systems already and also know the place where to configure a plant for cross system goods flow.
What I would like to know is if this scenario is supported at all and if yes, what is the sequence of idocs and and what are their triggers (in other words - the technical side of the business process) .
Best regards
Norbert

Similar Messages

  • Cross-system stock transfer order (cross CC and without using APO)

    Dear experts,
    I want to set up a stock transfer order scenario cross two SAP systems (and cross company code).
    The examples given in SAP documentation point to scenarios using a joint APO system.
    At the same time the documentation reads:
    The number of process variants is a result of the combination of system landscapes and organizational units:
    - with or without joint SAP APO
    Does anyone in here have experience in setting up this scenarion without using APO system and could help me with a process flow and the IDOC sequence used for this?
    Thanks and regards
    Norbert

    Hi,
    and thanks for looking into this.
    No, I do not have an APO (company is using JDA/manugisitcs) and I want to set up cross system STO between two ECC 6.0 systems directly.
    I do have a number of idocs running between the systems already and also know the place where to configure a plant for cross system goods flow.
    What I would like to know is if this scenario is supported at all and if yes, what is the sequence of idocs and and what are their triggers (in other words - the technical side of the business process) .
    Best regards
    Norbert

  • Charm without Cross system object lock

    Dear All,
    We have requirement for configuration of Charm without cross system object lock i.e. solution manager will be used for documentation but create, release, import request from the development system itself.
    Can we make changes in the functionality and use charm for documentation only?
    if anyone has the same requirement can you please let me know steps to be followed.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Sushant

    Dear Prabhakar,
    Thanks for the reply.
    Our project has just gone live and issues immediate resolution is being carried. Charm will integrate with system and training is required for that which at this point of time not possible but at the same time without affecting the issue resolution we want to log the changes in solution manager.
    We will use the CSOL feature may be some time later.
    At present i have not activate CSOL, still the document doesn't flow through. Document got stuck at "In development" phase and doesn't move forward. It doesn't allow to change the status.
    Regards
    Sushant

  • Need to control demand flow from APO system in the R/3

    HI Gurus,
    Kindly help me control the demand flow from APO system in the R/3.
    We want to change the timeline where demands coming from APO are given back to APW. The idea is to have a control table in APW where we can set a number of days or weeks by sales org / customer number. Within this number of days / weeks, no demand should be created / updated from APO system.
    Kindly advise the possible solutions to control Demand in R/3 flowing from APO.
    Thanks in advance.
    Naveen.

    Check user exit CIFPIR01 (inbound from APO to SAP).
    Rgrds,

  • Cross system goods flow issue

    Hi ,
    Our client uses 2 SAP different Systems for EU and US region.
    For intercomany movements between these Systems, we use STOs for these cross  system goods flow.
    We use inbound deliveries for receiving goods.
    It works for STOs with no account assignment but for STOs with some account assignment , we could not post goods receipt for Inbounds . System throws error message as please enter valid plant instead  of XXXX where is XXXX is a plant number in different SAP system.
    Is some extra config required for intercomany movemnts with account assignment.

    Hi,
    Could you please elaborate more your error :
    As which Acc. assignment cat you using in PO, and what type of intercompany STO's you creating in system ?
    What Doc type used for creating STO intercompany ?
    Regards,
    Ninad Kshirsagar

  • Menu-drive page flow without having to resort to portals

    Is it possible to use the page flow system in a cross-frame context, without having
    to resort to the Portal paradigm?
    We need to display a menu in the top frame and the actual page displayed in the
    center frame needs to change when a menu option is clicked. I know this sounds
    a lot like the portal, but it is much more simple. Can I find an example somewhere
    on how to implement this with only a page flow.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Jan Noppen

    Hi Jan,
    we needed something similar in one of our projects. I don't know if you
    mean html frames, or you just used the word to describe the menu-content
    structure. We had the later.
    We used netui:templates to do it. We created a template that contained a
    menu and the actual content. The jsp-s of the pageflow used this
    template, so they had the menu. The different parts can communicate
    using request or session.
    BR,
    don
    Template:
    <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
    <%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8"%>
    <%@ taglib uri="netui-tags-template.tld" prefix="netui-template"%>
    <%@ taglib uri="netui-tags-databinding.tld" prefix="netui-data"%>
    <%@ taglib uri="netui-tags-html.tld" prefix="netui"%>
    <netui:html>
    <head>
    <netui:base />
    <title><netui-template:attribute name="title"/></title>
    <link href="<%=request.getContextPath()%>/resources/css/style.css"
    type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"/>
    </head>
    <body style="margin:0">
    <jsp:include page="menu.jsp" />
    <netui-template:includeSection
    name="bodySection"></netui-template:includeSection>
    </body>
    </netui:html>
    jsp in pageflow:
    <!--Generated by WebLogic Workshop-->
    <%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8"%>
    <%@ taglib uri="netui-tags-databinding.tld" prefix="netui-data"%>
    <%@ taglib uri="netui-tags-html.tld" prefix="netui"%>
    <%@ taglib uri="netui-tags-template.tld" prefix="netui-template"%>
    <netui-template:template templatePage="/resources/jsp/mytemplate.jsp">
    <netui-template:setAttribute value="Title of page" name="title"/>
    <netui-template:section name="bodySection">
         some content
    </body>
    </netui-template:section>
    </netui-template:template>
    Jan Noppen wrote:
    Is it possible to use the page flow system in a cross-frame context, without having
    to resort to the Portal paradigm?
    We need to display a menu in the top frame and the actual page displayed in the
    center frame needs to change when a menu option is clicked. I know this sounds
    a lot like the portal, but it is much more simple. Can I find an example somewhere
    on how to implement this with only a page flow.
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Jan Noppen

  • Cross company sales without intercompany billing

    Hello,
    We are trying to set up cross-company sales without intercompany billing. Here is our scenario:
    Company code 1000, Sales area 1000
    Company code 2000, Sales area 2000
    Sales order is entered in sales area 2000, but is delivering from a plant in company code 1000 directly to sales area 2000's customer.
    We would like this scenario to work similarly to the "stock transport order without intercompany billing" scenario, where intercompany billing is not used; rather, the intercompany clearing accounts defined in FI are used.
    We have removed the intercompany billing type defined in the SD config, which has prevented the system from creating an intercompany billing document. However, the accounting entries are not correct.
    The problem is with the post goods issue. The inventory is being relieved into company code 1000's cost of goods sold. Instead, we want it go to the cost of goods sold in company code 2000.
    From a financial perspective, it is currently doing:
    Company code 1000:
    Credit Inventory
    Debit Cost of goods sold
    But we want it to do:
    Company code 1000:
    Credit inventory
    Debit Intercompany A/R clearing account
    Company code 2000:
    Credit Intercompany A/P clearing account
    Debit Cost of goods sold
    Does anybody know how to configure this?
    Thanks,
    JB
    Edited by: Jimmy Brush on Aug 19, 2010 11:13 PM

    Hi,
    Check these notes:
    SAP Note 109254 - Customizing stock transport order Cross Company
    SAP Note 338922 - Analysis note for cross-company transactions (delivery)
    SAP Note 543821 - FAQ: cross-company processing
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Cross system flat files

    Hi Experts,
    We are working on a Cross System RAR scenario using 3 systems, to check the Violations. Of the three two are oracle and Peoplesoft and another would be SAP one.
    In order to test this scenario , we need flat files in the format so that we can build it on our own and the same can be uploaded for peoplesoft or oracle systems through the Configuration setting as a legacy system data.
    Can you Please help us to get the flat file format.
    Regards,
    Gurugobinda

    I know that SAP offers an attractive migration plan from Peoplesoft to HCM, but a standard mapping for various external non-SAP application's data models to GRC functions with actions and permissions I have not seen yet.
    To date I have only concentrated on important non-SAP applications when there was a reason to include a small selection of functions from them --> web based purchasing and contract management systems. If you do this without going overboard, you can easily just enter the data in the application.
    Perhaps Gurugobinda wants us to actually go get the data from their non-SAP system... We also have to find out which type of application software it is, on which os and db, how it is configured and any custom "exits" or fields used, and how it is integrated with other communication partners, possibly also mapping external user ID's.
    We each have $ 5000 cash to start with, a laptop, a compass and a piece of string.
    @ Gurugobinda: You need to go talk to these people. Tell them which data you want and ask them to deliver the data with fields you can map to what GRC does with it. I would try to keep this non-SAP part as simple as possible.
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Logical Systems vs Cross Systems

    Dear all,
    I have two physical SAP ERP systems grouped under one logical system.
    Now I want to connect to a third SAP ERP system in order to execute Cross System analysis between the systems under the logical system and the new third system.
    I understand that I cannot do a Cross System RA on systems of the same logical system so that´s the reason why I need to set up the third system as a single new ERP system.
    Anyhow the new ERP system should use the same rule set than the two systems of the logical system.
    So I´d just like to set up the new system connector for the GRC 5.3 but I do not want to load the same rules again for the new ERP system, etc.
    Is this possible? I tried to create a new logical system containing the new ERP system and regenerate the rules for the logical systems. But after that no simple RA is possible for the new ERP system.
    Thanks for any advice and regards,
    Markus Richter

    Hello Markus,
      Yes, you are right that you can not include the third system in the same logical group if you wish to use it for cross-system analysis. If you choose to have this as a stand alone system in RAR then first you will have to upload the rules for this stand alone system in RAR. The rules loaded for logical system will not work for this system as it is not part of the logical system group.
    Regards, Varun

  • How do I revert back to previous (before 11) itunes. Someone nicked my Album Cover flow, without asking

    how do I revert back to previous (before 11) itunes.
    Someone nicked my Album Cover flow, without asking. I have snow leopard. I was happy. Just before Christmas as if I havent got enough to do Thank You. I've given Apple loads of money this year--presents and all, the least they could do is tell me, they're going to take stuff off of My computer that I enjoy,/ find very useful/ and worked hard to update all my album covers and have a gallery of my own artwork for my mixes--it was beautiful. When I went to add some more, the facility had been taken away from me. Was so dissapointed. They send me emails all the time to buy the latest must have products. I even did a questionair to help them. They really care for their customers--right. So why couldnt they warn me about this update, its only polite.
    If I bought a warm coat some years ago, then the manufatures came round without my knowledge and cut off the left arm, and later told me, their reserch says that people dont use the left arm so much so they have to get rid of it. 1. I think that would be illegal. 2. its impolite not to ask if they could do it. 3. why not give me an options to keep it, seeing as i bought it. 4. its ludicrous.
    I trusted Apple-but then -they took my YouTube off my ipad. I cant update to newer software as I will lose some expensive programms (Im not made of money). I also have 2 oldish defunct but fully working laser printers (if they were compatible with new software).
    Im not a techky-I just use the stuff, I do art and music and Cover Flow was equipement I used.
    I want to get rid of itunes 11, anyhelp out there

    click the blue download button...
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1576

  • Error while performing Risk Analysis at user level for a cross system user

    Dear All,
    I am getting the below error, while performing the risk analysis at user level for a cross system (Oracle) user.
    The error is as follows:
    "ResourceException in method ConnectionFactoryImpl.getConnection(): com.sap.engine.services.connector.exceptions.BaseResourceException: Cannot get connection for 120 seconds. Possible reasons: 1) Connections are cached within SystemThread(can be any server service or any code invoked within SystemThread in the SAP J2EE Engine), 2) The pool size of adapter "SAPJ2EDB" is not enough according to the current load of the system or 3) The specified time to wait for connection is not enough according to the pool size and current load of the system. In case 1) the solution is to check for cached connections using the Connector Service list-conns command, in case 2) to increase the size of the pool and in case 3) to increase the time to wait for connection property. In case of application thread, there is an automatic mechanism which detects unclosed connections and unfinished transactions.RC:1
    Can anyone please help.
    Regards,
    Gurugobinda

    Hi..
    Check the note # SAP Note 1121978
    SAP Note 1121978 - Recommended settings to improve peformance risk analysis.
    Check for the following...
    CONFIGTOOL>SERVER>MANAGERS>THREADMANAGER
    ChangeThreadCountStep =50
    InitialThreadCount= 100
    MaxThreadCount =200
    MinThreadCount =50
    Regards
    Gangadhar

  • IDocStatus:Error in ALE service Cross-system company code does not exist

    HI All,
    I am sending CREMAS04 IDOC from XI to one R/3 system,and in R/3 a vendor should get created in master table.
    My IDOC is getting posted successfully but in R/3 system I am getting error that
    IDoc: 0000000000705816 Status: Error in ALE service
    T100 Text: Cross-system company code XXX does not exist
    I have created partner profiles in receiver system and in partner profiles I have set the process code as CRE1.
    Please help me to resolve this problem.

    Hi Shweta
    Have you checked with the data i.e. company code .
    May the company code which you are passing is not there in ur receiver system.
    Just check it out.
    Regards
    -Mitesh

  • Cross-systems analysis and max. rules for a risk

    Hi all,
    Customer environnement: GRC AC RAR 5.2 linked to 3 R3 4.6C environments (FB0, FB1 and FB2) with different purposes. Users and roles can exist in the 3 systems so we need to run cross systems analysis.
    It turns out that the cross-systems analysis works well only if you declares the functions on only 2 environments (FB0 and FB2 or FB0 and FB1).
    If we declare the functions on 3 environments (FB0, FB1 and FB2) one reaches the maximum number of rules for a risk, namely 46 655.
    This limit is it revised upwards in version 5.3 (if yes, how?)
    Or there happens a workaround solution to run cross system analysis on multiple physical systems (the customer environment target is 6!) ?
    Regards

    The limit is based on the number of character combinations are available for a risk, so if the number of characters has been increased thenteh number of rules available won't have been increased.
    In AC 5.3 the number of characters for a risk ID is 4 which is the sames as AC 5.2 therefore I doubt trhat the limit has been lifted of the code changed to accomodate mor rules per risk.
    The only way around the issue is to create smaller risks instead of looking in systems 1, 2 & 3 look in 1 & 2, and 2 & 3 and 1 & 3.  Not ideal but at least you will get some results.
    Sounds likje an enhancement request needs to be raised to me.

  • AE 5.2 cross system risk analysis with CC 4.0

    Hi,
    We have an unique situation.
    We have CC 4.0 (central) set up in ECC system where the rules and risks are defined for systems such as R/3, HR and SRM
    We need AE to use this central CC system to do the risk analysis when an access request for HR or SRM is submitted in AE 5.2. Right now for a request to a HR system, risk analysis is being done in HR system where there are no rules and hence no risks are identified.
    Environment :
    CC 4.0 in  ECC 5.0 with VIRSANH RTA 520_640 Level 3 and VIRSAHR RTA 520_640 Level 2
    AE 5.2 JAVA in NW 7.0 SP level 2
    Risk analysis for Access requests to ECC system is done with out any issues and the connectors in AE are defined as well as CC 4.0 configuration for cross system is enabled.
    Please give your suggestions and also tell me if this below scenario is possible.
    Use CC 5.2 Java stand alone system and define logical/cross system to connect to multiple systems such as HR and SRM and use those specific rules to do the risk analysis.
    Thanks

    Hi RM,
    You can setup Risk Analysis inside AE Configuration.
    You can identify the level of risk analysis and specify the Compliance Calibrator version for processing risks.
    See the details from the AE Configuration Manual
    In the Select Compliance Calibrator Version pane, from the Version drop-down list, select the version of Compliance Calibrator.
    In the URI field, enter the appropriate URI address for the web services.
    In the User Name field, enter your User ID. Your User ID must have security access
    to web service.
    In the Password field, type your password.
    Select the Perform Org Rule Analysis option to perform org. rule analysis at risk
    analysis time.
    Note: There are two selectable versions of Compliance Calibrator. If you select 5.0 Web Service, three additional fields appear (URI, User Name, and Password). For the URI field, you need to navigate to the
    SAP NetWeaver Web Application Server Home page > Web Services Navigator > CCRiskAnalysisService > WSDLs > Standard link of Document, where you will see a list of all web
    services in the server. Select the desired URI address.
    If you select Compliance Calibrator 4.0, there is no need to connect to a URI address
    So the answer is YES, you can connect AE  5.2 with CC 4.0 for Risk Analysis.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Kiran Kandepalli.

  • Is it possible to connect multiple R/3 systems to one APO system?

    Hi,
    Is it possible to connect multiple R/3 systems to one APO system?
    Kind regards,
    Kris De Smedt.

    Hi Kris,
    Yes, you can connect multiple R/3 systems to one APO system. All you need to do is to maintain connection parameters of all the R/3 systems with APO. (i.e. RFC Destinations, logical systems, partner profiles etc.)
    Regards,
    Naveen.

Maybe you are looking for