Cross system SOD check

Hi All,
We have SAP Compliance Calibrator by Virsa Systems Release 4.0 . One of the clients does not have Virsa installed and we need to check for user and role SOD conflicts in this client. Please advice what are the settings required for cross system connections and how to run the reports for remote checks. Also, will this affect any existing settings / setup?
Many thanks
Vijaya

Vijaya,
As far as I know, you will need CC 4.0 RTA installed on every system. Please open a message with SAP and check with them. Most of the customers have moved to RAR 5.3 which is the latest and advanced version of CC 4.0 and I will recommend you to upgrade to RAR 5.3.
Regards,
Alpesh

Similar Messages

Compliance Calibrator v4.0 - Cross System SoD Analysis

Hi all,
I'm looking to run SoD analysis across BI7 and ERP using Compliance Calibrator v4.0. I can see the Parameter in the config overview, and have set it to yes is both systems. But there is nothing else in the documentation as to what other config etc is needed. Does anyone now the steps involved or could you point me in the direction of documentation.
Thanks in advance,
Fiona

Hi,
there is a difference only if you have created and assigned mitigation controls to users.
In that case, you can decide to see the report of SOD conflicts with or without mitigation controls:
- Either you see all SOD conflicts including these that are mitigated (it is however clearly stated in the report whether a mitigation control exists or not)
- Or you see all SOD conflicts excepted these that are mitigated (we consider thus that mitigated conflicts should not appear in the report)
Rgds,
Karim

Error while performing Risk Analysis at user level for a cross system user

Dear All,
I am getting the below error, while performing the risk analysis at user level for a cross system (Oracle) user.
The error is as follows:
"ResourceException in method ConnectionFactoryImpl.getConnection(): com.sap.engine.services.connector.exceptions.BaseResourceException: Cannot get connection for 120 seconds. Possible reasons: 1) Connections are cached within SystemThread(can be any server service or any code invoked within SystemThread in the SAP J2EE Engine), 2) The pool size of adapter "SAPJ2EDB" is not enough according to the current load of the system or 3) The specified time to wait for connection is not enough according to the pool size and current load of the system. In case 1) the solution is to check for cached connections using the Connector Service list-conns command, in case 2) to increase the size of the pool and in case 3) to increase the time to wait for connection property. In case of application thread, there is an automatic mechanism which detects unclosed connections and unfinished transactions.RC:1
Can anyone please help.
Regards,
Gurugobinda

Hi..
Check the note # SAP Note 1121978
SAP Note 1121978 - Recommended settings to improve peformance risk analysis.
Check for the following...
CONFIGTOOL>SERVER>MANAGERS>THREADMANAGER
ChangeThreadCountStep =50
InitialThreadCount= 100
MaxThreadCount =200
MinThreadCount =50
Regards
Gangadhar

IDocStatus:Error in ALE service Cross-system company code does not exist

HI All,
I am sending CREMAS04 IDOC from XI to one R/3 system,and in R/3 a vendor should get created in master table.
My IDOC is getting posted successfully but in R/3 system I am getting error that
IDoc: 0000000000705816 Status: Error in ALE service
T100 Text: Cross-system company code XXX does not exist
I have created partner profiles in receiver system and in partner profiles I have set the process code as CRE1.
Please help me to resolve this problem.

Hi Shweta
Have you checked with the data i.e. company code .
May the company code which you are passing is not there in ur receiver system.
Just check it out.
Regards
-Mitesh

Cross-System Depreciation Area Transfer

Hi,
I need to execute inter-co asset transfer between COD that have different depreciation areas.
For eg,
COD 1 - book depreciation area 01, tax depreciation 02
COD 2 - book depreciation areas 01, US tax depreciation 10, 11,12,13
Can anyone advise how do I configure the above? The transfer to book area should be using gross method and to tax area should be net method.
Thank you.

HI,
Following are the steps required for the configuration as per your requirement
1. define cross syteme depreciation area for both book of depreciation and tax of depreciation in each company company code and as per the requirement mentioned check tax depreciation area in COD 1 whethere any functionality (properties)of the tax depreciation area mentioned in COD2 ma tches if it matches then we can mapp the cross system depreciation area to that particular depreciation area.
2. check comapny id : whether it is legal entitiy( company code assigned to same company)
whether it is independent legal entity ( company code assigned to different company)
3. create transfer variant enter the cross system depreciation area and mentioned transfer method( 1- gross method 2- nett method) and mention the transaction type one for retirement and acqusition resp and mention the transaction type fro prior acq and current year acqsition.

ALE configuration, Assign Company Code to Cross-System Company

Hello all,
I set up and configured ALE so that we can keep our production, QA, development master data in sync. I activated the change pointers for the particular message type for which we want to create IDOCs when new master data is created, or existing master data is changed. IDOCs are then sent to the QA and development systems.
Are these three ALE configurations associated with anything outside of ALE? Is there any area that can or will be affected by these three configuration settings?
Transaction SALE
Cross-System Company Codes
 - all Company codes in our system
Assign Cross-System Company Code to Chart of Accounts
 - all Company codes are associated with the one chart of accounts
Assign Company Code to Cross-System Company
- global company code is the same as the company code
Thanks
Bruce

In T.Code: OX19 - Assign company code to controlling area
Please check that if for ur Controlling Area, the
Currency Type:
Currency:
Currency Type
10 Company code currency
20 Controlling area currency
30 Group currency
40 Hard currency
50 Index-based currency
60 Global company currency
Currency
required code of Currency
Should/Are properly maintained in OX19.
This type of error will be for this stage itself.
Provide points if satisfied
Regards
Dinakar
SAP will be throwing this type of messages when
Differing currencies: USD - CAD
Message no. KT276
Diagnosis
The system makes consistency checks during assignment of a company code to a controlling area as part of assignment control.
The same checks take place if assignments already exist and you change the basic data in the controlling area, or if you define the controlling area and company code as a 1:1 structure.
If the check finds an error, the system cannot execute the function ("Assign" or"Change basic data"). If you do not maintain the required data for the consistency check (such as currency, chart of accounts, or fiscal year variant in the company code), this also results in an error message.
You want to use currency type USD. The SAP System determined the company codes assigned to controlling area CAD and the relevant currencies. One discrepancy occurred in one of the currencies.
Note
A precondition for currency type "10" is that all company codes assigned to the controlling area must use the same currency.
A precondition for currency types "40" and "50" is that all company codes assigned to the controlling area must belong to the same country or use the same hard currency or index-based currency.
A precondition for currency type "60" is that all company codes must belong to the same company or all the companies must use the same currency.
Procedure
Change the currency type or the currency settings.

Intercomany Asset Transfer - Cross System

Hi All,
We have a requirement to do intercompany transfer of assets across system. One company code is in one system and the other one is in different instance.
I researched on SCN and got to know about ALE scenarios for Cross-System Asset Transfer. (https://help.sap.com/saphelp_globext607_10/helpdata/en/47/e49bf3c3f511d1952f0000e82debf7/content.htm?frameset=/en/47/eb0…)
Wanted to check if someone has experience with this scenario (interco asset transfer between different systems) or is there any alternative solution.
Thanks,
Mayank Agarwal

Please go through with the link, it might help you. If it will help you please assign point to me.
Basics of Asset Accounting - Asset Transfer (Intercompany) - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki

CC5.2: Logical and Cross Systems - Best Practices

Hello,
we are using CC5.2 in a landscape of multiple SAP systems. In order to streamline the process of creating our rule set I would like to clear up my confusion about the use of logical and cross systems.
Here my questions:
1. Are logical systems intended for encapsulating systems of following stages (e.g. DEV1, QA1, PRD1) or to group systems of one stage which have the same structure of risks and therefore can share rules (e.g. DEVECC1, DEVECC2, ...)?
2. I don't see entries of logical systems in the Rule Architect - wouldn't it make sense to create functions for logical systems instead of uploading function authorizations for each system?
3. When you create functions for one sample system - is it sufficient to generate the rules for the logical system the sample system belongs to?
4. Regarding the cross systems functionality: After creating risks across different systems - is it still necessary to create corresponding cross systems and to generate the rules from the cross systems menu?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Regards,
Martin

Hi Frank,
thanks for your answer.
I now see the handling of logical systems as independent from system landscape tiers. After recreating the desired logical system for a second time it now also appears in the Rule Architect and in the upload dialog of function authorizations. I guess that after uploading them it's still necessary to generate the rules for logical systems in the configuration tab under 'logical systems' ?!
Regarding the cross systems functionality I don't understand the redundancy of the different settings. Actually there are four options for cross system checks. Let's go into detail:
a) Functions can include actions of different systems...
b) ...and they can be flagged as cross system functions. --> Should not the system automatically set the analysis scope of a function to 'cross system' when functions include actions of different systems or is this flag used for the analysis of logical systems?
b) Risks can include functions referencing to different systems. --> In my understanding it is essential that in this case the analysis scope is 'cross systems'. Is it still necessary to create cross systems and to generate rules for those? (Seems a bit redundant.) Or does one option take precedence over the other?
c) Finally you can setup 'cross systems'. --> How is the relation of cross systems to the other settings mentioned above? Do you have to create cross systems for each combination of systems which are related in risk definitions or function definitions? Or can all related systems be accumulated in one overall cross system?
Hope, there is not too much confusion now
Thanks and regards,
Martin

Cross system depreciation area

We are facing a production issue while transferring assets between two company codes . Each company code is assigned to diffreent chart of depreciation with different depreciation areas.
Now we have to define cross system depreciation area to resolve this issue.
Could you let me know what are the config stps involve in changing to corss system depreciation area.
Alos if anyone has document on this please forward it.
Thanks

HI,
Following are the steps required for the configuration as per your requirement
1. define cross syteme depreciation area for both book of depreciation and tax of depreciation in each company company code and as per the requirement mentioned check tax depreciation area in COD 1 whethere any functionality (properties)of the tax depreciation area mentioned in COD2 ma tches if it matches then we can mapp the cross system depreciation area to that particular depreciation area.
2. check comapny id : whether it is legal entitiy( company code assigned to same company)
whether it is independent legal entity ( company code assigned to different company)
3. create transfer variant enter the cross system depreciation area and mentioned transfer method( 1- gross method 2- nett method) and mention the transaction type one for retirement and acqusition resp and mention the transaction type fro prior acq and current year acqsition.

Cross System object lock

We have implemented Charm in Solman 7.0 Ehp1. I have activated 'cross system object lock' both globally (report tmwflow/config_services) and in satellite System (tcode- /n/tmwflow/cmsconf). am able to change the same table again which i had edited earlier and stored in TR.
am i missing somewhere.
Thanks

Hello Powai,
Please, check the link below, there you can find good informations about CSOL.
/people/rajiv.jha/blog/2010/08/30/csol-managing-parallel-projects
Best Regards,
Diego Fischer

ChaRM:Cross system object lock:Ovelapping

Hi Friends,
In SE38, while activating the service "/TMWFLOW/CONFIG_SERVICES", i am seeing following conflict scenarios:
Cross-Project, Client Specifi, Ovelapping
Cross-Project, Client Specifi, Partial Ovelapping
What is the meaning of overlapping? In which scenario it can be used?
Thnaks for your input
PSK

Hi
There is a feature call cross object locking in solman it is used for that
you can check below note for all the available modes
Note 981729 - Cross-system object lock: Alternative lock modes
Hope it solved ur basic doubt
Regards
Prakhar

Cross System Lock using for roles?

Hi everybody,
maybe one of you can support me or have some experiences in case of using the Cross System Lock. We are checking the possibilty to implement the Cross System Lock (using in ChaRM, Scenario E (/TMWFLOW/Config_Lock).
First of all, we made a successful test in usage of table content.
Example:
You save a table modification in a Transport Request generated in ChaRM. Thus, the Transport Request is buffered in a Change Document. The result is that the table modification is locked in the object-monitor (/TMWFLOW/LOCKMON).
However, you save a role (pfcg) in a Transport Request generated in ChaRM the included objects in this role are not buffered in the object-monitor (/TMWFLOW/LOCKMON)
Thanks for your answers!
Best regards
Joachim Eichner

If you use the report TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE against the role transport after saving your changes in it, this will register the role objects in the CSOL.
The Role transport tool does not automatically trigger the FM that registers the objects in the CSOL, just like manually adding objects to a transport doesn't trigger it. Therefore the workaround is to run this report. Only the transport owner is allowed to run TMW_TRKORR_LOCK_UPDATE.
In our experience it is not that CSOL does not support roles and authorizations; for the purpose of retrofit, it is able to detect conflicts reliably if the report is run consistently after saving role changes to transport. If no conflicts exists, auto-import works fine. If conflicts exist, then roles must be manually retrofitted.

Cross System lock between CRM & R3

Hello Experts,
I really appreciate if someone route me in right direction for below scenario:
Requirements: We used standards SALESCONTRACT object to download salescontracts from R3 to CRM, additonally development custom XCONTRACT object to replicate from CRM to R3. Now I would like to introduce cross system lock similar way of Sales Order. Do you recogn this will work out or any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Bob

hi,
write a BAPI while creating a Contract in CRM pass the contract number as import Parameter check for the contract in R/3 output the Flag if present eq 'X'.
Regards,
Balakumar.G
Reward Points if helpful.

Cross system object lock after SP24 upgrade

Hi Team,
We have recently updated from Sol Man SP23 to SP24. I have set-up cross system object lock (CSOL) in SP23. It was working perfectly.
When we are in SP23, i have made following settings:
In T.code: u201C/TMWFLOW/CONFIG_SERVICESu201D , i have set he conflict analysis as "Cross-Project, Cross-Client". So i that i will always get "Warning" Messge while processing SDHF and SDMJ correction.
In t.code: /n/TMWFLOW/CMSCONF , the CSOL is active.
Recently we have upgraded to SP24. After SP24 upgrade, the CSOL is not working properly. The configurations are same as earlier.(Before SP24). Now if i process SDMJ or SDHF corrections, the CSOL always gives me "ERROR" message but i want to get "WARNING" message as earlier. I have checked the conflict analysis in t.code u201C/TMWFLOW/CONFIG_SERVICES". It is still "Cross Project, Cross-Client" only.
Any additinal SAP notes to be implemrnted to correct this behaviour.
Your valuable guidance required.
Thanks
Kumar

I dont believe this is possible at the moment. As you must be already aware, that SAP releases the locks from the objects as soon as the transport request is released from the Development System. Unless, this locking mechanism is extended to various systems first (DEV and QAS) and later to parallel landscapes (eg:- Project landscapes) it would be difficult to bring in this feature.
Rgds,
Abhijeet Bhagat

Cross system company code does not exist.

Hello,
I am trying to upload Cost center through IDOC menthod.
Message type of IDOC is : COSMAS
Basic Type : COSMAS01
But i am getting a error as Cross system company code does not exist in ( Create IDOC Overview).
Kinly help me in resolving this issue.
Regards,
Hemanth.
Edited by: hemanth kumar on Feb 20, 2009 3:08 PM

Hi Shweta
Have you checked with the data i.e. company code .
May the company code which you are passing is not there in ur receiver system.
Just check it out.
Regards
-Mitesh

Cross system SOD check

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for