CS2 to CS3

I have a question about upgrading from CS2 to CS3...
Obviously, CS2 does not include Dreamweaver or Flash, so when
I install the upgrade version of CS3, will it install Flash and/or
Dreamweaver CS3? (even though I have no previous versions of
Dreamweaver or Flash)
Thanks
Kit

On Tue, 6 May 2008 18:10:59 +0000 (UTC), "kitster79"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>I have a question about upgrading from CS2 to CS3...
>
> Obviously, CS2 does not include Dreamweaver or Flash, so
when I install the
>upgrade version of CS3, will it install Flash and/or
Dreamweaver CS3? (even
>though I have no previous versions of Dreamweaver or
Flash)
>
> Thanks
>
> Kit
Actually, that's not obvious as my CS2 included DW8.
You'd have to read the upgrade policy on the Adobe site and
pick which
version you were upgrading to. There are several different
packages.
Win
Win Day, Wild Rose Websites
[email protected]
drink it. feel it. share it.
http://www.mymonavie.com/winday/

Similar Messages

  • Cs2 and cs3 and cs4 on the same pc xp? could be a mess up?

    Hi
    i have some questions
    i bought cs2 some time ago , i guess 4 years but now i don't remember
    and i did installed on my pc ,  never had a problem
    after when cs3 come out , i tried the trial version , the first time i did  not like it , but after 2 weeks , i liked and i need it for camera raw
    i upgraded my cs2 license
    well the point i donwnload the trial version of cs4  (english version , because most of the tutorials are in english) while cs2 and cs3 are in my language
    i tried to make a custom install (i did not install all the comonent)
    something went wrong ,when i tried to uninstall cs4 , i don't know but cs4 did not uninstall all the components (the uninstaller keeps adobe color Na, Ja, Eu, color common setting and cmaps)
    i downloaded the cs4 cleaner for adobe page , but the adobe cleaner for cs4 was not able to clean these components, it tried to clean cs3
    well i  had to use windows installer clean up manually
    delete every thing that is related to cs4
    uninstall cs3 and re-install it
    so after this mess, i ask if i can keep cs2 cs3 and cs4 (i think i will buy or upgrade) in the same pc running xp?
    my second question
    2) after updating cs4 , run the cs4 update utility and update all the cs4 components , cs4 seems to be more fast then cs3 , still on old pc with a powerfull machine like a p4 3.6 with 2gb of ram  and a good graphic card pci express
    is my feeling ? is the cs4 more fast then cs3 on not fast pc , isn't it?
    thanks too much
    and have a nice day

    thanks John Joslin
    CS4 is faster than CS3 on a computer which supports it.
    which are the computer that supports it ? i run xp
    why did the uninstaller do a mess up ?
    thanks

  • Images print too dark from Photoshop CS2 and CS3

    Having used both CS2 and CS3 I now realise that the prints that I work on in either appear much brighter on the screen that they do when printed, as much as 3 stops darker when printed. I have also noticed that in other programs such as Google Picasa that I use as a viewing tool the images appear closer to the images from the printer. I have used various pro-labs that require their profiles to be used and my own epson 3800 printer at home and despite trying lots of different settings I am unable to get prints that look like they do on the screen they are always darker.
    I am using windows XP on a dual core 2.4 PC with 2 Gb ram and an ATI Radeon X1600 series grafix card which I have just updated the driver on. The monitor is an LCD type and is calibrated weekly using a spyder 2 express.

    First isolate whether your display is too bright or your printer is too
    dark. I'd start by printing images from another source and see if they
    look as they should. www.drycreekphoto.com has a number of calibration
    images that should do for this purpose.
    Once you've isolated the problem, we can take it from there.

  • Photoshop CS2 or CS3 on Snow Leopard Mac?

    Does anyone have a clue about whether CS2 or CS3 will run on the new Snow Leopard OSX when it is released? Apple has indicated that Snow Leopard will only run on Intel equipped machines. I'm presently running G4 and G5 units. I was thinking of buying a new Mac PowerBook Pro later this year but if it is going to render all my present software obsolete, i may rethink the question and stay on the Leopard OS version.

    Thanks! I appreciate your response. it will help in my future decision making. BTW- although Adobe may not support CS2 on Leopard 10.5.7, my experience is that it has been running fine with the exception of the "web gallery" feature. I am able to build web galleries fine in Photoshop Elements 6 however. The failure of web galleries for me in CS2 may be something other than the OS affecting it.

  • Upgrading from Illustrator 10:  CS2 or CS3? (CS4 and CS5 do not run on my Mac)

    Provided I'm able to find a legitimate copy of the upgrade version from a reputable source, which one is the highest Mac version that one can upgrade from Illustrator 10?  CS2 or CS3?  Higher versions won't run on my PPC Mac anyway.
    I'm asking now because I just finished upgrading my ancient Acrobat Standard 5.x to Acrobat Professional 8 for under $29, shipped.  It turned out to be a sealed, unopened box, and I've registered it with Adobe already and collected the registration incentive received from Adobe (11 hours of training at lynda.com).
    Any input will be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    Wo Tai Lao Le
    我太老了

    CS4 requires OS10.4.11 or newer.
    Basically, you can go all the way to CS4 or anything short of that. Without moving past the PPC chip and OS10.4.11.
    Since CS4 will work, CS3 will certainly work. I believe CS3 required OS 10.4.8 or newer. Checking my disk.... yup 10.4.8 or newer. I would simply look for whatever you can find, short of CS5. That itself may sort out what you can purchase.
    Actually thinking upgrades.. you're right. Only 3 versions. So for "upgrade" you're limited to CS3 from Ai10. CS3 will run great on a PPC with 10.4.11. I'd search for that if possible. I wouldn't settle for CS2.

  • Upgrade from CS2 to CS3? (for Windows XP)

    Hi, guys. I'm new here. And I only signed up for the forums so I could ask someone for help!! Haha! So, here goes......
    I recently started using Adobe CS2.
    I signed up for the 30 day trial of RadLab by Totally Rad. It worked fine, but my trial expired before I could finish the photos I had been editing. So I uninstalled the RadLab trial, signed up for a new trial with a different e-mail address, and re-installed it. Only, this time, RadLab wouldn't work. So I contacted Totally Rad and the guy told me that RadLab won't work on CS2. It has to be CS3 or higher. (I'm still confused as to how RadLab worked for 30 days on my CS2 if it supposedly only works on CS3 or higher)...
    So, now, I am looking to upgrade from CS2 to CS3... but I don't know where to look. I tried Google, but nothing seems to match what I'm looking for. I would hate to upgrade all the way up to CS5, because I don't think my PC could handle it. (I've been told that CS5 takes up a lot of room, and I don't think my computer is strong enough to hold it all. My memory capabilities are very limited. Even with CS2, I couldn't open/edit much all at once.)
    I say all that, to ask this...
    How do I go about upgrading from CS2 to CS3, and it not cost me an arm and a leg? I'm on a super-tight budget ($150 is the absolute highest I'm willing to go). I'm unemployed and money is extremely tight.
    Thank you in advance for your help!!

    Countrydust73 wrote:
    I signed up for the 30 day trial of RadLab by Totally Rad. It worked fine, but my trial expired before I could finish the photos I had been editing. So I uninstalled the RadLab trial, signed up for a new trial with a different e-mail address, and re-installed it.
    I don't want to burst your bubble about using Photoshop CS3, but I would expect any software with good trialware security to not work twice on the same system no matter whether you sign up with a different eMail address.  They'd be stupid not to have it work that way.
    If you need the software to get your project done, why not actually buy it?
    You're no doubt expecting to derive value from your project...  Shouldn't the people who worked to create the software you're using derive some value from their work as well?
    I can appreciate your being on a budget, but the old saying "if you want to play you have to pay" comes to mind.  I'm sorry to be blunt.
    -Noel

  • [JS] Need Help Removing File extension (in CS2 and CS3)

    Hello All.
    I have a menu in a dialog that needs to list some file names, but without their file extensions (which will always be .txt in my case). The following is some code that successfully does this in CS3, but I also need it to work in CS2. Do you have any other ways to do this? One code that works in both versions (CS2 and CS3) is ideal.
    myNameWithoutExtensionFunction = function( myNameWithExtention ) {
    myNameWithoutExtension = myNameWithExtention
    myEndOfFileName = myNameWithoutExtension.lastIndexOf( "." )   // get the last period (.) in the filename
    if ( myEndOfFileName > -1 ) {
      myNameWithoutExtension = myNameWithoutExtension.substr( 0, myEndOfFileName )
    return myNameWithoutExtension
    Thanks in advance.
    Dan

    I realized my mistake. The above code works just fine in CS2. My mistake was elsewhere. The name I was sending to this function wasn't being recognized by CS2. Once I corrected that and sent a valid name to this function it worked. So in case someone needs to remove file extensions, feel free to use the above function!

  • CS2 upgrade - CS3 or CS4?

    I have CS2 Premium and Studio 8 (they came together). It includes Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Version Cue, Dreamweaver, Flash, Fireworks, Contribute and Flashpaper.
    Is it more cost effective to upgrade to CS4 (my MacBook Pro can handle it ... )or is CS3 good enough? AND can I still upgrade from CS2 to CS3?
    I'm a working pro and will probably go to 4 eventually, but just trying to spread the cost!
    My gear: MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, 4GB RAM, 250Gb HD, OS X 10.5.6

    Neil and all: The Apple Store does not sell any CS3 software and immediately stopped selling it upon receipt of Adobe's new suite of applications. Furthermore, Apple sells all applications and hardware and software for full MSRP -- you get no discount on anything, save whatever Apple (only) has on sale.
    I note one thing here among the protests:
    i Nobody has mentioned any reasons for upgrading to CS4 on a Mac other than "it's current and you might get burned if you buy shady software from a shady vendor."
    i Nobody has offered the original poster any specific advantages of CS4 over CS3 applications, save "it might cost more to upgrade to CS5 from CS3."
    Frankly, everyone writing software today is hard-pressed to get applications out that work well. Adding a 64-bit operating system to the mix increases the workload. My hat's off to these programmers.
    Some upgrades back, Adobe released the healing brush for Photoshop. That was very much worth the upgrade. The tighter integration between Adobe applications in CS3 was a good improvement. But when improvements are "evolutionary" and not "revolutionary" in terms of my workflow, I tend to be a late-adopter or I wait a whole version to upgrade.
    Has anyone tried CS4 on a G4? How about a G4 running at 1GHz?
    I know what Marrin's running and she's set for CS4 or CS5, as she has eight cores running like a bat out of hades and probably still has room to upgrade her RAM. But even with a dual quad-core Mac Pro, there is a performance hit that occurs after an upgrade while one is learning the new ways of working.
    I like to call that "the fritter factor," where a certain amount of productivity is reduced because you are "frittering" away valuable time trying to figure out the new workflows that have been introduced due to the upgrade.
    I don't plan to upgrade, for example, to Microsoft's latest Office suite. I know the suite of applications I have and they work just fine, thanks. Microsoft would love for me to "upgrade" to a version that now lacks Visual Basic for Applications and I don't have the time to rewrite my macros in Applescript (assuming that works for the new Microsoft suite).
    The upgrade to Adobe's CS4 is considerably more costly than $7 monthly. And I have not been convinced that it will run at all well on my Macintosh. I also have no idea what the "fritter factor" is versus the suite I all ready have.
    Perhaps the Apple salesman needs an education. He certainly was not trying to (as he was unable to) sell me CS3. But, as he works for Apple and not Adobe, he is not required to be a walking advertorial for Adobe. He was speaking from his own experience in using the Adobe suite of applications on his own computer in his personal time. I found it interesting that he made his comment and I reported it to my friend.
    As to 64-bit applications, it is known that they can work on larger projects through the use of more system RAM for those projects. But, since data arrives in 64-bit chunks, processing can happen up to twice as fast as 32-bit processing because the data words are twice as large. Adobe is to be praised for rewriting one application in the suite, as the task is difficult. But I don't use Vista. I have a Mac.

  • Actions and Templates CS2 to CS3

    Looking for pointer to a resource that will explain how to migrate important resources from Photoshop CS2 to CS3. Principally interested in actions and metadata templates, but there may be others.

    Renee,
    Since CS, PS has the ability to easily handle most common PARs, because of its interface with video, where PARs are a big deal. If you're going to Web, or going to print, then square pixels, are what you need, and what PS was originally designed to work with.
    Are you opening frame-captures from video? These could be almost any file format, TIFF, TGA, JPG, BMP, PSD, etc. If so, then they may well have a different PAR. Are you adding these TIFFs to a New Image, created with, say, the NTSC 4:3 .9 PAR setting?
    If all you do is square pixel work, and all of your Assets are square pixel images, AND PS is still telling you about the PAR, then a pref. is likely messed up for you. Try restting your prefs.
    Hunt

  • IPaletteMgrService in CS2 and CS3...

    I try to use IPaletteMgrService in both CS2 and CS3 on the Mac (10.4.x, PPC only or Universal) and I am going no where... as always, I can get it to compile but the call back is not happening.<br /><br />In the class descriptoion table, I have:<br /><br />Class {<br />    kBscPnlPaletteMgrServiceBoss, <br />    kInvalidClass,<br />    {<br />        IID_IPALETTEMGRSERVICE, kBscPnlPaletteMgrServiceImpl, <br />    }<br />}<br /><br />and implementation as:<br /><br />class BscPnlPaletteMgrService : public CPMUnknown<IPaletteMgrService> {<br />public:<br />    BscPnlPaletteMgrService(IPMUnknown *inBoss);<br />    virtual ~BscPnlPaletteMgrService() {}<br /><br />    virtual void PaletteMgrStarted();<br />          <br />    virtual void PaletteMgrAboutToShutdown() {<br />        SysBeep(33);<br />    }<br />};<br /><br />void BscPnlPaletteMgrService::PaletteMgrStarted()<br />{<br />    SysBeep(33);<br />    CFShow(CFSTR("it's a wonderful world"));<br />}<br /><br />CREATE_PMINTERFACE and REGISTER_PMINTERFACE are provided.<br /><br />Btw, the callback functions' parameters are different in CS2 vs. CS3.  This is the CS3 version.  <br /><br />Any help would be appreciated.<br /><br />pete

    I realized my mistake. The above code works just fine in CS2. My mistake was elsewhere. The name I was sending to this function wasn't being recognized by CS2. Once I corrected that and sent a valid name to this function it worked. So in case someone needs to remove file extensions, feel free to use the above function!

  • Upgrade Photoshop from CS2 to CS3 in Macintosh

    I am currently using Photoshop CS2 Mac version and DO NOT have CS3 beta version installed. I have couple installation questions whose answers are hard to find anywhere else, hope I can find them from this forum.
    Since I heard a lot of troubles regarding upgrading PS from CS2 to CS3 if there is CS3 beta version already installed in Mac, I am a little be nervous. Here is my questions:
    1. Can CS2 and CS3 co-exist?
    2. Do I have to manually uninstalled CS2 prior to upgrading? If yes, how do I do it? I am assuming that CS3 upgrade should have a program to uninstall previous versions of PS, am I correct?
    3. How do I deal with my current registration?
    4. I have third-party plug-ins such as OnOne Mask Pro 4.0, nik Color Efex Pro 2.0 installed in CS2. What's the right procedure I should take to avoid their re-installation?
    5. I also have Lightroom installed now, will CS3 upgrade affect it? Do I need to take any action?
    Thank you very for help!
    Regards,
    Howard

    Patrick,
    Welcome to the Macintosh. Glad the transition has worked well for you. A few quick points, here:
    1. Download the combo update to Mac OS X 10.4.11 from the Apple site.
    2. Any software that came from the previous owner must be Apple software that is included with the operating system; or, if other Apple or third party software (including Adobe or Microsoft), it must have a valid license that has been transfered to your name and you must have all discs. Otherwise, it must be deleted in order for you to be legal.
    3. The best current utilities for maintaining and optimizing your computer include: Apple's own Disk Utility (on your Mac OS system disc); Alsoft DiskWarrior; and Maintain Cocktail. Other very good tools include: Roxio Toast (for disc burning); SuperDuper! (for complete system backups); and FontAgentPro (for organizing and maintaining large numbers of fonts). Whether you just print family snapshots or you do four-color commercial printing, you need to calibrate your monitor. Look into the Spyder3 or EyeOne calibrators.
    Also note that it is important to repair permissions and run DiskWarrior when you install or upgrade any software on your system. As the specifics of these have been detailed numerous times in this forum, I recommend that you do a forum search for the details.
    4. If you already have installed CS2, then you only need to purchase the upgrade version of CS3.
    I hope this helps!
    Neil

  • Problems opening and saving PNG over network with CS2 and CS3

    using os10.4.11
    photoshop CS2 or CS3
    I've recently tried to save images in PNG format,  small (no more than a couple hundred kilobytes) and found that whenever I tried to save to the server it would hang photoshop and require a force-quit. Saving the same file to the desktop works fine. Copying said file to the network and then trying to open that PNG from the server results in a photoshop hang, while opening that same file from the desktop works fine. I know all about the fact that Adobe doesn't support working over a server, but that's never been an issue at my workplace in all the years I've worked with (never had problems saving/opening any format, no corrupted files ever). If I try to open that same PNG from the server with CS2, same result. If I try to open it over the server using Photoshop CS, or version 7, however, it opens just fine. If I copy the Photoshop CS version of the PNG plugin and replace the PNG plugin installed with CS3 by default, then it seems to work and I can now open and save PNGs anywhere with no problems. Has anyone else had this problem? I can see that the file size of the PNG plugin has changed version to version, so something about it has changed. It seems as though there is something defective about the ones installed with CS2/3, and just copying the CS version into my CS3 folder clears up the problem.
    Also, the problem is not limited to my computer. Other macs that try to open PNG files from the server using CS3 or 2 also hang.

    Yes, we're a prepress company moving around probably a few dozen gb of data per day, saving PSD, TIFF, EPS, JPEG, all kinds of formats. It's the first time I've had a client requesting PNG files, and so the issue has come to light. This is the first time I've ever seen any kind of issue opening/saving across our network in 8 years. (the only time I've ever seen a corrupt file was a 1.6gb image that didn't copy correctly, and that wasn't a photoshop-related corruption, but an OS drag/copy of the file)
    I'm not sure if I'll be able to find someone with OS 10.5 or some other version to see if they cause problems. If anyone else reading this who works over a network can test a PNG open/save over their network and list their OS and Photoshop version it may help. I'm going to see if I can find some other computers to try it out on in the meantime and mention it to IT.

  • IPhoto, Photoshop CS2 or CS3 beta?

    I asked here earlier if iphoto can change the color of peoples eyes and received the response that iphoto is primarilly a final stage editing tool.
    therefore im asking which is better... this should be answered by those who have used either/or both...
    which is better right now... to edit photos
    Photoshop CS2 or CS3 Beta?
    All i want to do is simply make photos better. photos of friends and family. adjustments like changing or making eyes a lighter color, things like that.

    Decemberist:
    I've been using the beta since it's been out and have had no problems at all. It's so much faster in loading and running than CS2.
    But Terence is exactly right about PS Elements. PSE can't work with CMYK files but that's pretty much specialized for professional printing. For the general user it does everything we could want. Here's one example of the advanced capabilities.
    Do you Twango?
    G5 Dual Core 2GHz, 2G RAM, 250G HD; G4 Dual 1Ghz, 1.5G RAM, 80G HD, QT 7.1.3,   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   22 LCD, 250G/200G/160G FW HDs, Canon: SD700IS/i850/LIDE 50, Epson R200, 30G iPod

  • CS2 vs CS3 printing to Epson 3800

    In trying to diagnose a Photoshop/11880 printing problem, I made some test prints to an Epson 3800 from the same test file. Andrew Rodney's "printer test" image includes very smooth color gradations R > M > B > C > G > Y > R. This image was printed from PS CS2, PS CS3 and Lightroom to the Epson 3800 on Epson Premium Semigloss Photo paper using Epson's Pro38PSPP profile. The CS2 and Lightroom prints were identical. The transitions in the color gradations were very smooth. The CS3 print was very close in overall color balance, but the transitions in the gradations were not as smooth, or gradual, especially between magenta and blue, and between green and yellow. Shouldn't prints of the same file from CS2 and CS3, using the same profile, look identical? The on-screen soft proofs in CS2 and CS3 look identical, but the prints do not.
    4 x 2.5 GHz PowerPC G5.
    4.5 GB RAM.
    OS X 10.4.11.
    Photoshop CS2 9.0.2
    Photoshop CS3 10.0.1.
    Lightroom 1.2
    Epson 3800, Driver Version 3.57
    Direct USB connection.
    Epson profiles are located in driver package (as installed).
    Epson Semigloss Photo Paper 250.
    Photoshop Manages Color, Epson Pro38PSPP profile.

    Yes, all settings were the same. I got official word from Epson today there are problems with CS3. Epson, Apple and Adobe tech people are meeting in a few weeks to find a solution. In the meantime, all printing from my Macs to the 3800 and 11880 will be from CS2 and Lightroom. Thanks for your input.

  • CS2 and CS3 HATE more than 4-5 font styles......

    Running Mac OSX 10.4.11 with dual 2 GHz Power PC G5, 1 GB Ram.
    Both CS2 and CS3 start acting R E A L SSSSLLOOOWW when I'm using more than 4-5 font styles on a page, like when creating a new logo, and typing the same name in different font styles.... At that point every action takes a while, and I find myself waiting for the computer to react, while I can hear the hard drive crunching...
    This happens ONLY when I have several font styles opened.... Once I outline them all, the speed is back to normal....
    As my primary Scratch Disk I have my hard drive, which has more than 70 GB available free disk. Secondary Scratch Disk is set for NONE.
    What gives?????

    The problem more then likely is 1 GB of RAM running on 10.4.11 which needs almost that amount to run by itself.
    The problem with the 150 GB drive is not so much that it is small by todays standards it is probably an older hard drive and therefore probably has a 8MB buffer making itwell slow at transferring files such as to a scratch disk which is also part of the problem as it is also probably the scratch disk and now you have these two things going against you and slowing the whole thing down each time you do anything that caches.
    Like loading a applying styles to fonts.
    I would suggest more then 4 GB of RAM and another hard drive partitioned so one partition can be used as a dedicated scratch.
    Also you might look, to see if I am correct, by means of the About this mac under the Apple menu and look at the hard drives buffer if 8MB then you might want to replace it
    with a hard drive that is much larger and has a 32 MB buffer.
    Just some things to consider you are a bit behind the times.

  • Edit for CS2 and CS3

    Am making my transition from CS2 to CS3 and after installing and activating
    CS3, it now shows that program as an option for editing a picture, but it
    removed CS2. Is there a way for me to put back in CS2 as well? While I will
    eventually be doing all my edits in CS3, for the time being, I feel more
    comfortable having both available from the right-click menu in LR 1.1.
    Thanks much.

    Go to Lightroom - Preferences and click on the "External Editing" tab. In the lower half of the form you can set another app as an "additional external editor" - it then comes up as a choice when you right click in LR.
    Damian

Maybe you are looking for