CS3 Beta Intel Native

If you have CS2 you can test CS3 (NATIVE!!!!) for free
click here

How are you saving your script?
If you save it as a simple application, it will be listed as PowerPC.
If you save it as an Application Bundle (the preferred format), it will be universal.
In any case, the universal nature of the app is only part of the equation. Also important is the arcitecture of the other apps you're targetting.

Similar Messages

Rosetta, CS3 beta ???s

I've read about CS2 not running "natively" on the MBP Intel Core Duo, leading to sluggish performance, in fact I am experiencing this. Although I am not cure exactly what might be causing the problem, based on other posts it is likely I guess. I am running a 1.83ghz, 1.5 gb ram.
Someone from my thread (down below a few) mentioned installing the CS3 beta which works better.
I am not a technophile, so can someone please tell me where to look to learn more about "Rosetta"? I don't know what this is.
Also, I have been searching around the Adobe site for a CS3 beta upgrade, but cannot find it. Does anyone know where that might be?
Are betas generally safe to install?
Thanks!
G5, dual 2Ghz Mac OS X (10.4.6)
G5, dual 2Ghz Mac OS X (10.4.6)

can someone please tell me where to look to learn more about "Rosetta"? I don't know what this is.
Look here:
http://www.apple.com/rosetta/
I don't see anything about "creative suite 3" or "beta" anywhere?
Look here:
http://labs.adobe.com/
Are betas generally safe to install?
It depends on what you mean by "safe". The beta of Creative Suite 3 is unlikely to cause problems with your system overall, but this is most definitely a beta. It has bugs and problems, known and unknown, so you should not attempt to use this for any sort of production work (in fact, I strongly recommend that you not even install it on any system on which you depend for your daily business). Nor should you use it on the only copy of any important image; it's entirely possible that the image could be irretrievably corrupted. Work only with copies of your images.
Regards.
Message was edited by: Dave Sawyer

How can i tell if a plugin is Intel-native or not?

i have CS3 and i'm upgrading from a G5 to an Intel Mac.
is there a way to tell if installed plugins are PPC or Universal/Intel?
thanks

As I remember, if the plug-in is not intel native or UB they just won't show up.
If you really need to use a PPC plug-in you can select the info for CS3 in the finder and check the box that says run under Rosetta. Then all your Power PC plug-ins will show up.

Photoshop CS3 beta + Aperture problem

Is anyone having any trouble with photos in Aperture that were altered in the new PS CS3 beta?
I sent a photo to CS3 and added a few adjustment layers and when I saved, the thumbnail in Aperture appears as if it's inverted... like a negative. And the full screen version is much higher contrast than the PS version. Exporting a jpg shows the same problem. However, when I open that same image in PS again (using the open in external editor command), everything shows as fine.
Possibly just a bug since CS3 is still in beta?
1.83 iMac Core Duo Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2GB Ram

Matthew,
You can get this type of effect if you're using Alpha Channels in CS, CS2 etc. Did you by any chance save the image with an additional alpha channel?
G.

Lightroom, Photoshop, PS CS3 beta

I used to cleaner to remove Photoshop CS3 beta after inadvertedly deleting by dragging. The licensed version of PS CS3 is installed but apparently there are a couple of bits and pieces of the beta still around because when I click on Develop>Photo>Edit in Photoshop CS3.app it brings up the beta screen. Is there any way to change the location of this menu item manually? In other words, can I select the true app somehow?
Thanks

If I recall correctly, Adobe has made available an uninstaller for the beta that is required to get rid of it correctly. You might go over to the Photoshop forum and look around. I'm not sure what to do in your situation where you deleted incorrectly. But that forum may have hints as to what to do.
- Pierre

IPhoto, Photoshop CS2 or CS3 beta?

I asked here earlier if iphoto can change the color of peoples eyes and received the response that iphoto is primarilly a final stage editing tool.
therefore im asking which is better... this should be answered by those who have used either/or both...
which is better right now... to edit photos
Photoshop CS2 or CS3 Beta?
All i want to do is simply make photos better. photos of friends and family. adjustments like changing or making eyes a lighter color, things like that.

Decemberist:
I've been using the beta since it's been out and have had no problems at all. It's so much faster in loading and running than CS2.
But Terence is exactly right about PS Elements. PSE can't work with CMYK files but that's pretty much specialized for professional printing. For the general user it does everything we could want. Here's one example of the advanced capabilities.
Do you Twango?
G5 Dual Core 2GHz, 2G RAM, 250G HD; G4 Dual 1Ghz, 1.5G RAM, 80G HD, QT 7.1.3, Mac OS X (10.4.8) 22 LCD, 250G/200G/160G FW HDs, Canon: SD700IS/i850/LIDE 50, Epson R200, 30G iPod

Using a RAID as a CS3 beta scratch disk

I recently set up a RAID in my Mac Pro, creating it with the OSX Disk Utility. It functions fine as a faster, larger storage space. But when I try to select it in CS3 beta as my Photoshop scratch disk, it does not appear in the list of drives available.
CS2 does use it as a scratch disk, but the beta appears stuck in using the system disk.

I don't know of any reason wh the CS3 besta won't select your RAID set as a scratch drive so, I would suggest you contact Adobe through their bug reporting system and see what happens.
FWIW, given my boot drive is a RAID set CS3 beta does seem to work with it without issue.

Can't update device package for adobe DC in cd photo shop CS3 beta)

i've installed device central from CD Photoshop CS3 BETA ,
the problem is i can not install new device package for the file
that download from net , and it always shown ( the file update is
too new for this version of adobe device central ).... somebody
help me please ?

I am pretty sure that the Device Central that came with
Photoshop CS3 BETA is different from the official release of Device
Central that comes with CS3 products.
I had Photoshop CS3 BETA and DC working. Then I bought a
licenced copy of Flash CS3 and Device Central. The new device
package installed perfectly on the newer version of DC. However,
now that I have installed the new Device Central, I can't launch DC
from Photoshop CS3 BETA—it gives me an error.
That said, DC works great—with the update—but
only via Flash CS3 (or some other official launch product).

Probleme mit CS3 beta

Hallo,
ich habe Probleme bei der Installation von Photoshop CS3 beta. Leider kann ich die Lizenz nicht akzeptieren da ich keinen ok button habe. Ich weiß leider nicht weiter, habe ich schon meinen Windows installer aktualisiert.
Bitte helft mir =)

Danke für die Antwort.
So ganz genau kann ich es nicht nachvollziehen. Aber nachdem ich das Programm
mit dem Task-Manager geschlossen habe, anders wollte es nicht.
Und das Programm neu geöffnet habe hat es wieder funktioniert. Möglicherweise
war mein PC ein wenig Durcheinander durch die 40 updates, obwohl ich mehrere
Neustarts gemacht hatte.
Vielen Dank für die Hilfe.
Ich hätte aber noch ein 2. Problem.
Mein Haupt-PC, ich habe 2, hat seinen Geist aufgegeben und ich würde gerne diese
verlohrene Lizenz für mein Laptop nehmen, habe aber keine Ahnung wie.
Wissen Sie wie ich die Lizenz deaktivieren kann und für mein Labtop aktivieren?
Danke und schöne Feiertage,
Dotthy
Axel Matt <[email protected]> hat am 22. Dezember 2013 um 10:24
geschrieben:
Re: Probleme mit CS3 nach Windows updates
created by Axel Matt <http://forums.adobe.com/people/Axel+Matt> in Deutsche
Foren - View the full discussion
<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5950983#5950983>

Migrating PS CS3 to Intel with OS 10.5.6 Plug-ins Not Available

After migrating CS3 to MacBook Pro, 10.5.6, a list of unavailable plug-ins comes up. All except two were PS plug-ins, NOT aftermarket. Sure enough, they don't show up in the filters menu. I don't know where else they are missing. (migrated from Powerbook 10.4.11)
What is to be done?
CS3, OS 10.5.6/ MB Pro 2GB ram, 2.4 Ghz

Migrating is never a great idea, but migrating an application originally installed under Tiger on a PowerPC machine to a Mac-Intel box running Leopard goes beyond being a monumentally bad, horrendous idea. It's sheer lunacy!
You need to wipe out that drive, or at least use the Adobe Uninstaller (installed by CS3 in Applications/Utilities/Adobe/ on your old machine), look for, download and run the CS3Clean script, and then install the application from the original media.
Also, realize that any plug-ins that were not written in Universal Binary will NOT run under CS3 on the Mac-Intel machine,
unless you run CS3 under Rosetta software emulation with a corresponding
massive performance hit.
Never, ever try
"migrating" again. :(

Is flash 8 pro or flash cs3 better

I am about to buy either flash 8 or cs3 so can some one help
me. Now i have used both trials and noticed flash cs3 had better
grapics design but flash 8 i mainly used action script and noticed
it had a bar to the side that told what each script did and when
you put in the script a bar came up and help you fill in the action
script and i was wondering if flash cs3 had that same feature
because im still new at flash and action script. If you can help me
i will be grateful.

Yes. CS3 has that same feature.
Dan Smith > adobe community expert
Flash Helps >
http://www.smithmediafusion.com/blog/?cat=11
http://www.dsmith.tv
"shnaru" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fobbcj$67g$[email protected]..
>I am about to buy either flash 8 or cs3 so can some one
help me. Now i have
> used both trials and noticed flash cs3 had better
grapics design but flash
> 8 i
> mainly used action script and noticed it had a bar to
the side that told
> what
> each script did and when you put in the script a bar
came up and help
> you
> fill in the action script and i was wondering if flash
cs3 had that same
> feature because im still new at flash and action script.
If you can help
> me i
> will be grateful.
>

Wls 6.1 on solaris 8 intel: native libraries missing (libmuxer.so ...)

It seems that the native libraries for sparc only are included in WLS 6.1???
#file libmuxer.so
libmuxer.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked,
not stripped
Where can I get the intel version?
# ./startWebLogic.sh
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris:/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/oci816_8
* To start WebLogic Server, use the password *
* assigned to the system user. The system *
* username and password must also be used to *
* access the WebLogic Server console from a web *
* browser. *
Starting WebLogic Server ....
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:11 AM CET> <Notice> <Management> <Loading configuration file
./config/helsana/config.xml ...>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:17 AM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <Starting WebLogic Admin
Server "sunetweb"
for domain "helsana">
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:22 AM CET> <Notice> <Management> <Starting discovery of Managed
Server... This feature is on by default, you may turn this off by passing -Dweblogic.management.discover=false>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Notice> <Management> <Application Poller not started
for production
server.>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <ListenThread listening
on port 80>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Error> <Performance Pack> <Unable to load performance
pack, using Java I/O instead.
Please ensure that libmuxer library is in /usr/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/bin/../lib/i386/hotspot:/usr/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/bin/../lib/i386::/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris:/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/oci816_8:/usr/lib
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/libmuxer.so:
ld.so.1: /usr/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/bin/../bin/i386/native_threads/java: fatal: /usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/libmuxer.so:
wrong ELF data format: ELFDATA2MSB
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1419)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1343)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:749)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:820)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.<init>(PosixSocketMuxer.java:90)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:237)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.makeTheMuxer(SocketMuxer.java:192)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.getMuxer(SocketMuxer.java:144)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(ListenThread.java:232)
>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <SSLListenThread listening
on port 443>

Hi.
We only support Solaris on Sparc platforms, so there are no intel libs for Solaris 8.
Regards,
Michael
Dominik wrote:
It seems that the native libraries for sparc only are included in WLS 6.1???
#file libmuxer.so
libmuxer.so: ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib SPARC Version 1, dynamically linked,
not stripped
Where can I get the intel version?
# ./startWebLogic.sh
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris:/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/oci816_8
* To start WebLogic Server, use the password *
* assigned to the system user. The system *
* username and password must also be used to *
* access the WebLogic Server console from a web *
* browser. *
Starting WebLogic Server ....
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:11 AM CET> <Notice> <Management> <Loading configuration file
/config/helsana/config.xml ...>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:17 AM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <Starting WebLogic Admin
Server "sunetweb"
for domain "helsana">
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:22 AM CET> <Notice> <Management> <Starting discovery of Managed
Server... This feature is on by default, you may turn this off by passing -Dweblogic.management.discover=false>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Notice> <Management> <Application Poller not started
for production
server.>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <ListenThread listening
on port 80>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Error> <Performance Pack> <Unable to load performance
pack, using Java I/O instead.
Please ensure that libmuxer library is in /usr/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/bin/../lib/i386/hotspot:/usr/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/bin/../lib/i386::/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris:/usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/oci816_8:/usr/lib
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/libmuxer.so:
ld.so.1: /usr/j2sdk1_3_1_02/jre/bin/../bin/i386/native_threads/java: fatal: /usr2/bea/wlserver6.1/lib/solaris/libmuxer.so:
wrong ELF data format: ELFDATA2MSB
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1419)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1343)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:749)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:820)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.<init>(PosixSocketMuxer.java:90)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:237)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.makeTheMuxer(SocketMuxer.java:192)
at weblogic.socket.SocketMuxer.getMuxer(SocketMuxer.java:144)
at weblogic.t3.srvr.ListenThread.run(ListenThread.java:232)
>
<Jan 18, 2002 9:57:28 AM CET> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <SSLListenThread listening
on port 443>--
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

Is CS3 better for working with RAW images than Elements 6?

Hi all,
I am trying to find out if it is worth buying CS3 in stead of elements 6. Surprisingly, nobody has been able to tell me what the difference exactly is.
The best I got so far was that elements is a trimmed down version of CS3 but what more can I do with CS3?
As I am in England, CS3 would cost me about $1100, as opposed to $650 in the US, which is a bit much if you don’t know exactly what you get for that amount.
It says something on the adobe features section about BETTER raw processing, but not compared to what. Old version? Other software? Better than nothing?
I will be running it under XP, and the only use will be to optimise images from a digital camera in RAW format, 90%, and a jpeg (10)%, partially for web use, partially for prints.
The most common things are:
Correcting exposure when pics are unevenly lit.
Correcting color temperature.
Removing unwanted parts of a picture e.g. somebody stepping into the picture, advertising signs or copyrighted material.
Altering color of small parts of an image like that of a single flower in a bouquet.
Removing blemishes in portraits.
The photos will always stay single photos, I can not foresee any use for slide shows, animations, video or anything related.
From what I have been able to find out so far, it seems that Elements 6 will do all this and I don’t need to spend the extra $1000, or should I?

I have not used Photoshop Elements since version 2.0. In that version it was very similar to Photoshop as far as how the interface was designed. There were a few key elements that were missing such as the Curve adjustment. It is my understanding that there is a free download available from a third party source that will provide that capability.
As far as Camera Raw is concerned, you only have the adjustments that are on the basic panel and the details panel. That means you don't have all of the hue/saturation/luminance adjustments, or lens correction, or the capability to create presets, or to calibrate ACR specifically for your camera. As I understand it, it is not possible to load multiple images into ACR so that you can apply changes to all of them at once. And I don't believe you have the option of working in ACR in 16-bit mode.
With Photoshop Elements it is not possible to record actions to enable you to do batch processing of your images. What you have is a good quality basic single image photo editor.
I cannot tell you which to purchase. I don't know what you are accustomed to, nor do I fully understand your expectations. There are trial versions of both programs that you can download and try for 30 days to see what you think. They are fully functioning programs for that trial period, which should be ample time for you to determine which program will give you the most value.

Illustrator CS3 and Intel Core2

I am having problems saving my files. Some files take 35 mins to save. I have many layers and a placed JPG in my file. The file is 2.4KB. I have similar file sizes and they take about the same time to save as well.
I am using:
Dell Optiplex GX745
Intel Core 2
2GB of RAM
What I have started doing is using the pathfinder to merge shapes together and it seems to cut down on the file size it also saves easier but still takes a while to save.
Is it okay to run Illustrator CS3 on a Intel Core 2?
thank you,
cherie

Yep, I run it all day on Core 2 and Quad Core. Sounds like some kind of system problem, rather than a file problem. And are you sure the file is 2.4KB? Did you mean 2.4MB or 2.4GB? But even at those sizes it shouldn't take 35 minutes to save.
Is the drive you're saving to local? External? Network?

Strange behavior ACR 4.5 W/CS3 on Intel MacPro W/ OS 10.4.11

I installed ACR 4.5 on my MacPro running OS 10.4.11 and all seemed fine except that if I open an image and try some settings with either a RAW or JPG file and then click on "CLOSE" the computer or CS3 the computer flashes bright for just an instant. as though I had triggered on of expose's hot corners. I have never seen this before. Obviously something is going on that the machine or CS3 does not like... and it never happened with ACR 4.4.1. Is there some place I can report this to the Adobe Beta folks for testing?

>Is there some place I can report this to the Adobe Beta folks for testing?
The Contact link at the top of this page.

CS3 Beta Intel Native

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for