[CS4] Word Import severely broken

(Not a question, rather an observation...)
The Word import has gone from already rather bad to worse with one of the upgrade patches. Two major nuisances that don't seem to have been present from the initial version (based on "we'd surely have noticed this earlier"; they also are definitely not present in CS3!):
Random paragraphs are cut off at the end, continuing on the same line with the next paragraph. The cut-off part appears at the very end of the imported text -- including its hard return. So when I see some stray words at the end I know I have to scan the entire document by eye to find where they came from. Entirely random -- reading a same file twice, or on a different computer or platform, will have the same error but on a different place.
Importing a Word document no longer reads text point size correctly. Sometimes entire paragraphs are in the wrong point size -- at random, not simply using the wrong style or something like that. This is extremely bad, as my firm relies on point size for proper automated formatting.
Rather random -- some paragraphs will be wrong on other computers, some are wrong at random.
This is not limited to one platform; all our computers, Mac and Windows, Leopard, Snow Leopard as well as XP (SP3) will all import a certain file with these errors. Of course all systems are fully patched up to 6.0.4.
It's also not limited to .doc files. Saving the file as .rtf has the exact same symptoms: in Word, all is fine & dandy, in CS4 the text and formatting gets garbled.
A working kludge is to import suspicious documents into CS3, save, open in CS4 and go from there. Hardly a solution.

[Jongware] wrote:
I found that a troublesome document keeps being troublesome ... saved as .doc, rtf, or docx. At any time, something or the other goes wrong with the very same document: cut off bits and pieces of text, footnotes that go haywire, formatting out of whack, text cut off immediately following a table ... And so on. So as soon as I see it happen on a particular doc, I import it into CS3, save, open that in CS4 and copy the text out of it. No problem anymore.
I filed a bug report to Adobe Tech services. Sent one of my Word docs with it, along with a CS4 file showing the problem of bits of text coming in at the end. They went over those files for a week and reported back "The change in text runs is because (a) the page size and margins of your Word file do not match that of your InDesign file, and (b) because of different layout and formatting options, the text may not run the same even if so." That made me laugh. Until I cried.
Thanks for the CS3 solution.
The mismatched margins issue sounds bogus to me. If stuff shows up at the end of file, out of sequence, it's most likely because the particular version of Word in which the original file was created got confused about managing incremental edits, and the file was "fast saved," which keeps the file content and changes in chronological order of creation, and uses pointers to mark what's added and what's to be deleted or ignored. Some versions of Word were so bad at this that even Word itself couldn't interpret the mishmash when opening a fast-saved file of its own.
A good practice that I don't recall seeing mentioned on these forums is, if possible, to make sure to save the Word file to a new name in Word, before converting or placing it in InDesign. Just as InDesign does, saving to a new name reorders the file content and cleans out the spaghetti pointers. I believe that InDesign's spaghetti doesn't go bad so often as Word's, but it's always a good idea to save to a new name periodically. It's possible that some problems that affect exchanging INX files are related to the reliance on pointers to keep a file in order.
Regards,
Peter
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

Similar Messages

  • [CS4] Word Import severely broken/Interim Solution

    As I said before on this topic,
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    The Word import has gone from already rather bad to worse with one of the upgrade patches. ...
    -- read this for the symptoms.
    I finally found a work-around. Strangely enough it was one that has been rattling in my head for a while, but I can't for the life of me remember where I got that idea!
    The problem lies in Word's Bookmarks. These are not recognized by InDesign CS4/CS5 Import filter (but they are by CS3 and earlier!) and thus each one of them creates a mis-match in the following text, accumulating up to the end of each paragraph (or possibly the next one, it's too idiotic to check for those fine details). Only at the very end of the document, ID suddenly realizes it has a few text fragments left over, and decides to tack them on to the end.
    With results like this:
    and yes, these text fragments belong somewhere in the middle of the document! Even worse, here you can see it's text that's been displaced, but it also happens with pure text formatting. Bye-bye smooth text import, hello Mr. Angry Client!
    I reported this issue to Adobe "Support" (hum hum), complete with test documents, and got the quite unexpected answer that it was unrealistic to expect "perfect import" because, well, my page size was different in InDesign, my margins were different, the paragraph spacing doesn't work the same as in Word ... so it was no wonder the text was "not the same after importing".
    Ahhhh ... now I got that out of my system: the solution is to remove all Bookmarks in the Word file prior to importing. For Windows, you can make a small VB Macro:
    Sub KillBookmark()
        While ActiveDocument.Bookmarks.Count > 0
            ActiveDocument.Bookmarks(1).Delete
        Wend
    End Sub
    but for OS X you have to take the manual route: go to menu Insert, select "Bookmark", point to one, select "Delete". Repeat until bored to death.
    Now that I have done the work Adobe programmers should have done (that is, finding out what the d*** problem actually was) and present them with a Ready-to-Implement Solution (revise the code that handles bookmarks): WHEN WILL THEY FIX IT!?!?
    Please don't say "CS6". I'm still on CS4, and since it got broken in that version, I must insist on a fix for CS4.

    [Jongware] wrote:
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    Just where did you send the report and test files? There's no way to attach files to the bug report form, so were you talking to some contract script-reading idiot who passes himself off for tech support these days, or did one of the engineering team actually get back to you and ask for the files? I suspect not the latter, and I can offer some suggestions for whom to email. In fact, I think I may put a bug in someone's ear now.
    Customer support, by e-mail. They *did* ask for files and I sent a whole bunch of them, original Word files, ID files to show how they got imported, and even separate screen shots of the problem pages with circles highlighting the broken parts.
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    As far as getting a patch for CS4, it's always nice to see a romantic dreamer.
    But Adobe broke it in CS4. I noticed it, working with CS4. I complained about it after noticing it in CS4, and I filed a customer support case (w/due documentation) for my version: CS4. It's Adobe's own fault, as they have such a bad customer support service that it cannot readily respond to complaints about the current version!
    Sorry Peter, this has been discussed before extensively, and Adobe never looked into it before. Remember me asking if this was ever solved in CS5?
    If you haven't escalated your case with customer support to a manager and then that manager's highest-level manager, like the DIRECTOR of customer support, that's a good thing to put into action. From there, insist that the case goes to the highest-level manager or DIRECTOR of technical support, so you can register it as a bug that will get attention, and at no charge to you for the tech-support call.
    Allt this might just be a way to put makeup on an ugly and unchangeable situation, but, since you've already invested so much effort, why not give it one more try by depositing your investment on the highest-level person's desk?
    HTH
    Regards,
    Peter
    Peter Gold
    KnowHow ProServices

  • When i am trying to create a report(using graph) in Word97 using Report generation Toolkit from Labview it's giving error in word import Module.vi that no such interface is supported could anyone help me out to solve this problem

    Word import Module.vi is trying to call Vb project and VB components thru active X controls when it's trying to call Vb components it's giving the error no such interface found..I am using Labview 6,MSoffice97,Graph8

    Hi Adam,
    It seems that there have been a couple other instances of the same error occurring and the problem is a conflict that occurs with the Office 97 only. Somehow the MS Office type library has been modified and this is causing incompatibilities with MS Office 97. Have you installed any other application on top of MS Office that plugs into MS Office tools – Adobe Acrobat, Visio, Reflection?? If so, you will want to see about uninstalling or reinstalling those utilities and then reinstalling Office 97 to restore the original MS Office 97 type library.
    Also, if you have a newer version of MS Office, I would highly recommend upgrading your computer. It seems that this problem is only with Office 97 and later versions of Office do not have this issue.
    Thanks again for bringing this question up.
    Kileen

  • Is there a way to import several tracks at once from my Boss BR8 so that they show up as separate tracks in GarageBand?

    Is there a way to import several tracks at once from my Boss BR8 so that they show up as separate tracks in GarageBand?

    I had to google your device - looks like it's a vintage multi-track recorder that records to Zip disks. So I guess there's no digital USB or Firewire multichannel output and no way to transfer your tracks digitally - or is there? If not, your only option is to record the device's audio track by track into GB.

  • Specifying PDF Open Parameters in Word Import Scenario

    I have created a number of URLs in a Word document that open on a specific page no. in PDF files e.g. http://www.adhc.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0008/228194/HomeModificationGuidelines.pdf#p age=4
    The parameters function as expected when opened directly in the Word document, however after importing and publishing in RH v9,   the parameterised URLs are ignored completely in the Browser (Internet Explorer).
    If I add the URL's via RH directly, they are OK, however I've got to keep the source in Word format.  Does anyone know if this is a limitation in the context of Word imports to RH or am I missing the point somewhere along the way? I've searched high and low for an answer and praying that there might be a solution or workaround!
    Many thanks in advance...
    Wilana 

    Thanks for this Wilana. This behaviour appears to be across the board in IE, FF and Chrome I'm afraid. It also only does this is the PDF is located externally - i.e. outside the project. If the PDF is included as a baggage file, the #page=x parameter works OK.
      The RoboColum(n)
      @robocolumn
      Colum McAndrew

  • Maintaining internal word cross references in word import

    I'm using RoboHelp 9.0.1 trying to import Word 2007 (docx) in order to generate a WebHelp. I have adjusted my style mapping in order generate an appropriate TOC with books and matching sub chapters, which works fine. However, internal Word cross references from the original Word document are not transformed into hyperlinks.
    I have already tried/verified the following:
    - The "convert cross references to hyperlink" option is checked in the RH-Word import settings.
    - I also tried fiddling with the Framemaker options as it is suggested in another thread (see beneath), with no success.
    - Within the Word source document I tried both options with "use hyperlinks instead" when creating cross references.
    - The RH-HTML source, in all of my attempts, does not show any links in the corresponding locations.
    What may I be missing here? According to another, similar thread, the feature should work and is really not that challenging:
    "RH9 - Can not create ANY links in linked Word documents"
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/854095?tstart=0

    In my testing, I got a link in the RH topic, but it wanted to launch the target Word doc instead of jumping to the desired RH topic. I'd say this sounds like a bug - so go ahead and report it.

  • I have an iPhoto library with only Jpeg's in it. I just installed Aperture 3.5 and imported several RAW photos. Shouldn't I now have an Aperture library?

    I have an iPhoto library with only Jpeg's in it. I just installed Aperture 3.5 and imported several RAW photos in Aperture. Shouldn't I now have an Aperture library?

    Should I create an Aperture library and import all of my photos from iPhoto to the new Aperture library? Then delete my iPhoto library entirely?  Just trying to get my library structure correct from the get-go as I plan to shoot only in RAW.
    That is not an easy question. There are still a few glitches with the unified library approach. For example, the new iWork applications will not yet show the Aperture library in the Media Browser, only the current iPhoto library. If you are using iWork with your photolibrary, keep it an iPhoto library.
    And it is unclear, what will happen, when Aperture or iPhoto will be upgraded to newer versions. Right now you need the latest iPhoto version to be able to upgrade older iPhoto libraries, if you want to open them in Aperture. So probably you will need to upgrade iPhoto as well, if you keep your library an iPhoto library, when both Aperture and iPhoto will be upgraded to Aperture 4 and iPhoto 12.0 or similar. In the long run it will be safer to convert the library to an Aperture library, if you do not want to keep updating iPhoto, but that can wait.
    If you want to convert the iPhoto library to an Aperture library, back up your iPhoto library.
    Then create a new Aperture library (with File > Switch to Library > Other/New ) and then import your iPhoto library into Aperture using the command "File > Import > Library" and select your iPhoto library.
    You will need plenty of space on the drive with the new library. Merging a library into another one will  temporarily a lot of working space and may take a long time - several hours for a large library, without visible progress.

  • Word import preset files in Windows 8

    Hello,
    Where are the Word import preset files stored in Windows 8?
    Thanks for the help,
    Jean

    I strongly recommend you to use firefox for faster and secure browsing
    but if you want to download chrome, my responsibity to help you.Follow some steps:
    1.Click on this link: http://www.google.com/chrome/eula.html?system=true&standalone=1
    2. Click on downoad chrome.
    3.accept & install.
    4.on next panal click ok to doownload
    thanks.

  • The word Import isn't highlighted (grayed out) so I'm unable to import

    Mon 28 of Sep, 2009 04:48 PST #
    Dave McDougall
    Firefox user
    I'm using windows xp service pack 3. Just got the new update:
    the word Import isn't highlighted (grayed out) so I'm unable to import

    This can happen if you run Firefox in [[Private Browsing]] mode.
    In Private Browsing mode some menu items are disabled (grayed) and some features like visited links and others are disabled and not working.
    You are in Private Browsing mode if you see "Tools > Stop Private Browsing"
    See also http://kb.mozillazine.org/Issues_related_to_Private_Browsing
    You enter Private Browsing mode if you select: Tools > Options > Privacy > History: Firefox will: "Never Remember History"
    To see all History settings, choose: Tools > Options > Privacy, choose the setting '''Firefox will: Use custom settings for history'''
    Uncheck: [[ ] "Automatically start Firefox in a private browsing session"

  • Impdp imported several MB but still 0 out of Nn million rows?!?

    Thank you in advance for looking into this.  I look forward to any help and insight you may be able to provide.
    Has anyone run into this issue when data pump shows "nMB but 0 out of millions of rows" NOT imported?!?  There are two tables in my import that do this.  I have also encountered this error as well  ORA-39166: Object was not found.  Which seemed to be circumvented ONLY after setting the characterset.  But now it cannot import data for two tables.
    Here is the background.
    The import was sent to me in two files.  The ddl in one dump and the data in another.  So I had to first create the DDL then import the data.
    Create the ddl parameterfile and import the metadata.
    Found the tablespaces from the source db.
    I created a ddl file via impdp. remapped the tablespaces, created the users.
    Import the data.
    I set the character set env variable and used the following settings in the parameter file.
    CONTENT=all
    DUMPFILE=DATA_PUMP_DIR:FILE.%U.dmp
    LOGFILE=DATA_FILE_DIR:FILE_20131126.log
    ENCRYPTION_PASSWORD='PASSWORD'
    REMAP_SCHEMA=SCHEMA1:SCHEMA
    JOB_NAME=SCHEMA_NAME
    table_exists_action=append
    FULL=N
    PARALLEL=9
    So I begin the import and this is the result :  (more than one table is not importing I showed two importing in my example however.)
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P597103"      663.4 MB       0 out of 32084160 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P434333"      589.0 MB       0 out of 29672535 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P635480"      656.6 MB       0 out of 32553771 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P651574"      658.8 MB       0 out of 32960374 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P460604"      626.5 MB       0 out of 30213168 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P567240"      620.5 MB       0 out of 31071412 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P577162"      633.1 MB       0 out of 31488125 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P387361"      583.8 MB       0 out of 28632631 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P402882"      592.3 MB       0 out of 28999710 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P542284"      606.3 MB       0 out of 30659587 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P366463"      567.9 MB       0 out of 27642766 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P377498"      571.3 MB       0 out of 28178251 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P339562"      608.0 MB       0 out of 26744122 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P357772"      622.4 MB       0 out of 27225225 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P578321"  234.1 MB 24498143 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P578324"  240.2 MB 24498143 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P192761"      449.9 MB       0 out of 21476694 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P287781"      545.0 MB       0 out of 25607178 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_01":"SYS_P336096"      558.2 MB       0 out of 26321351 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P593408"  235.8 MB 24863112 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P593423"  241.7 MB 24863112 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P623103"  241.4 MB 25219732 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P623104"  247.3 MB 25219732 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P647262"  245.2 MB 25629915 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P647342"  250.4 MB 25629915 rows
    . . imported "SCHEMA"."TABLE_02":"SYS_P519883"  233.9 MB 23413438 rows

    I responded to this post after I posted it because I found a solution.  I'm not sure why I do not see it.  Here it is:
    1. Re: impdp imported several MB but still 0 out of Nn million rows?!?
    OracleBarista Nov 30, 2013 9:43 PM (in response to OracleBarista)
    interestingly enough i was able to apply the rows to both of these two tables if I did not set the NLS_LANG in the environment and import both of them together.  That only worked for these two tables however.
    I do see one thing I find interesting one table shows 73K rows but not data and zero count when I select rows.  So obviously there is nothing there but I'm not sure why it's reporting rows.  Any ideas?
    Correct Answer 
    Helpful Answer
    Here is my response to you (DK2010):
    Sorry for the oversight should have been more thourough.  The version the datapump export was sent to me in was 11.2.0.2 the version database I'm using is 11.2.0.1.
    -- Futher response to my own post (pasted here).  Further research proved my suspicion which was the table was not part of any DUMP file I was provided.  I do not know why TOAD was showing it with 73K rows because SQL queries did not support that.
    I believe this question can be closed.

  • Importing several image sequences at once?

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's no way to import several image sequences at once is there?
    I have many folders of image sequences, but there's no way to drag 'n drop or import more than one at a time. Or if there is, the method is escaping me at the moment.

    For that, you can use Lloyd's brilliant script called Immigration: http://aescripts.com/immigration/

  • [solved] new pidgin severely broken

    the newest version from pidgin is severely broken. It segfaults everytime i start it. i tried removing .purple and it seemed to start ok, but then i added the oldest blist.xml and accounts.xml and it segfaults again, so it's not because of broken plugins...
    i'm not willing to configure everything by hand now, can anyone help?
    Last edited by nDray (2008-10-25 20:42:20)

    I'm having no issues with Pidgin, but you can try to downgrade to the previous version, if you haven't cleared your cache.
    Check into /var/cache/pacman/pkg and see if you find it, then install it with pacman using the -U flag.
    Other than that, if you want to fix the issue, I suggest to run pidgin from the command line to get some debug information (the -d flag is useful, too).

  • Crash when editing the Word import setting

    Hi all,
    on one computer (and with all projects, also new ones) there are frequent crashes as soon as the Word import setting are edited using this button:
    Maybe someone has an Idea what might be the specific problem in this case? It is not a general problem with Word, the output works.
    Robert

    Hi all,
    on one computer (and with all projects, also new ones) there are frequent crashes as soon as the Word import setting are edited using this button:
    Maybe someone has an Idea what might be the specific problem in this case? It is not a general problem with Word, the output works.
    Robert

  • Is there something wrong if I run language import several time?

    Is there something wrong if I run language import several time? For supplementation I am sure but for import not

    Hi Tina ,
                       You can import many times. If you have any test system try to import basis patch on it and import language pack.
    Regards,
    Hari.

  • Word import - hyperlinks work in one document, not in another

    Hi all,
    I am aware that much has been written about broken links after importing, but there is a strange pattern to my problem I have not seen before.
    I have three language versions of one document (English, French, German). So I set up three independent RoboHelp 8 projects and imported (linked) the corresponding Word documents. English and German are no problem, but in the French project, some (10%) cross-refs are not converted to hyperlinks. The involved titles have no accents, so it is probably not a character set problem. If I update the Word link or force update, it is always exactly the same cross-refs that are not converted correctly.
    The cross-refs in Word look like this:
    {HYPERLINK \I " title "}
    The cross-refs that do convert correctly have the same format, I see no difference between cross-references that work in RH and those that don't.
    Any ideas about this?

    Sometimes, but it does not seem to affect the function. There are working links with spaces at the end.
    On the other hand, there are strange things like this:
    I have two chapter titles named "Système de désignation des modules de fonction" and"Système de désignation des connexions".
    When I create hyperlinks, then Word inserts these fields:
    {HYPERLINK \l " Système de désignation"}
    {HYPERLINK \l " Système de désignation "}
    -> The titles are cut off in the middle, the text markers differ only by an extra space. These hyperlinks work in Word, but not in RoboHelp.

Maybe you are looking for