CS6 - multicamera sequence with different resolutions?

Hi,
I try to edit a multicam sequence with footage of the RED Epic (3840x2160) and a DSLR (1920x1080).
We shot an interview with two cameras. The final video will be FullHD. So we use the RED footage to generate two shots. A down-scaled and a cropped one.
Normally I use the RED footage in the non-cropped shot by (sorry my Premiere is German) "scale to framesize". So the 3840x2160 will be autmatically scaled down to 1920x1080.
When I use the "scale to framesize" to the multicam sequence also the DSLR-Footage will be shrunken.
So either the RED footage is too big or the DSLR footage is to small for the sequence. And I don´t wanna transcode the RED footage to FullHD cos i want to crop it sometimes, and I don´t yet know when. Is there any help?

No. The footage is made fine by the operator. But we want to do some crops sometimes to get another shot. 2 cameras -> 3 shots. So i don´t want to scale it down right now. Scaling down would help to cut the 2 cameras without another cropped shot. But the cropped shot is a planned shot. We did that many times, but never with the "comfort" of the use of multicam.

Similar Messages

  • Two sequences with different settings?

    In Premier Pro CS6, is it OK to use two sequences with different settings?

    Yes, no problem.
    You can make as many sequences with differents settings as you want.

  • Layout with different resolutions

    Hallo and good morning!
    Once again I need some advice:
    I have a program that is running on different machines with different resolutions.
    Is it possible to avoid, that the layout is paning all around?
    Best regards
    Hilby
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Hilby,
    No... that is currently a limitation of the layouts, where we try to adapt to each screen, but the objects and the layout may not fit into a different aspect ratio with a different number of pixels.
    The aspect ratio is the most important, followed by the total resolution of the screen.
    Some more information on aspect ratios is below.
    In summary, DASYLab is unable to completely adapt the "Screen" layout for evey monitor size and resolution. If you want to have a fixed layout that does not completely occupy some monitors, then consider using a fixed size, like A4 or A3.
    If you make something on a big monitor, 1600x1200 for example, and move it to a wide screen monitor,, 1600x900.
    From my friends at Wikipedia
    With computer displays, aspect ratios wider than 4:3 are also called widescreen. Widescreen computer displays were previously typically of 16:10 aspect ratio, now they are shifting to 16:9.
    Until about 2003, most computer monitors had a 4:3 aspect ratio and some had 5:4. Between 2003 and 2006, monitors with 16:9 and mostly 16:10 (8:5) aspect ratios became commonly available
    - cj
    Measurement Computing (MCC) has free technical support. Visit www.mccdaq.com and click on the "Support" tab for all support options, including DASYLab.

  • How can i create a .mov file from image sequence with different durations

    how do u create an image sequence with different durations? image one stays for 10 seconds and image two may stay for 30 and so on. each one has a custom duration. can this be done with an apple script or a text file saved as an mov file?

    Hello Omar,
    The example code Programmatic Printing of TestStand Reports - Modular contains a sequence that will convert an XML file to an HTML file given the XML file's path and the path to the stylesheet.  It may need to be altered to fit with the modifications you have already made to the report generation routines, but I think it should definitely get you off on the right foot.  Let me know if you have any questions!
    NickB
    National Intruments

  • Connect 2 externa monitors with different resolutions?

    Is it possible to oonnect 2 external monitors, with different resolutions to a mbp pro?
    I've read some about the "matrox solution", but that one requires that the monitors uses the same resolution.
    And, just to be clear, I don't want to just duplicate the screens, one should be primary.

    You may want to phone OWC and ask whether what you want to do is possible if one monitor is connected to the mini-Displayport and the other is connected to a USB port using this adapter:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/VIDU2DVIA/
    Note that the OWC adapter, like most USB video adapters I've seen advertised, is limited to a maximum resolution of 1600 x 1200, so you won't want to use it with a monitor whose native resolution is higher than that.
    Message was edited by: eww

  • HP 6730b can I swap screens with different resolutions?

    Hi,
    Is it possible to swap screens with different resolutions on a HP 6730b?
    Mine is 1680x1050 pixels and I want to find a 1280x800 screen to replace it.
    (letters are far too small for an old fart like me. ;-)
    The resolution list does support 1280x800 but it looks like viewing the screen through dirty glasses.
    Just wondering if the interface is the same.
    Cheers, 
    Bas

    Usually people want to go in the other direction. Here is the Service Manual:
    Manual link
    The parts list shows a panel that is SXGA+ (1400 x 1050) and a WXGA (1280 x 768 or 800) panel.
    There are multiple motherboards, but the only difference appaears to be whether there is a slot for a cellular card or not. In other words if you install the WXGA panel the motherboard should work with it and you will get 1280 x 800 resolution looking good. Laptop displays and other digital panels only work at their maximum aka native resolution and you get that muddy look if you try to run them at a lower res. You want to buy the whole panel with the cable designed for the WXGA....sometimes the cables will not work with a different resolution screen. Post back if you need further help finding a screen. You may find it cheaper and easier to sell or trade your laptop for one with the lower resolution screen.

  • Dynamically calling sequences with different prototypes

    Hi,
    Is there a way of dynamically calling from one sequence call, two sequences with different prototypes?
    Thanks,
    krs

    I know that this is not really an answer to your question, but could you write some sort of wrapper to the different sequences that has a common interface and call it?
    Bob Young - Test Engineer - Lapsed Certified LabVIEW Developer
    DISTek Integration, Inc. - NI Alliance Member
    mailto:[email protected]

  • Why are my HD videos all importing with different resolutions?

    Hi, I tried looking through like 10 pages of discussions on here and didn't see anybody else having this problem.
    I have a Canon Vixia HF200, I keep the settings on MXP (highest quality 1920 x 1080). Every time I log and transfer my videos they import at different resolutions (everything from the same day will be the same), some of them come in as 1440 x 1080, 720 x 480, etc, when they should all be 1920 x 1080.
    So, since some of them ended up being a completely different aspect ratio, I went into Motion>Distort and changed them all to 1920 x 1080, and I thought it was fine, but now I'm noticing that some of the videos look really out of focus (it seems like they get more out of focus every time I open it), so I'm thinking I probably shouldn't have stretched them....
    I checked the original videos in the browser and they all say 1920 x 1080 now, when I watch them in the viewer, they actually look like good HD videos, but in the canvas they're out of focus...
    I'm also working with multiple sequences, and when I copy videos from one sequence to another, it changes the resolution/aspect ratio/scale again, and becomes more blurry when I try to fix it.
    So basically, I have a huge mess. I'm working on editing a documentary that I'm making and now most of the video looks bad and I'm not sure how to change it back. I even tried starting a new project and importing the original videos, but they don't seem to have the original quality.
    Anybody know how I can either fix this or somehow replace the clips in the sequence with the originals in the browser to at least get some quality back?
    Also, a lot of the time when I render, I come back to the computer and it says something like "Error: Illegal (something) render failed" and completely loses the rendering that it spent a long time doing.
    I appreciate any help.
    Lisa

    Hi Lisa,
    Your 1920x1080 clips most likely import at their normal frame size, and then you placed them in the wrong sequence. Make sure your +File > Easy Setup+ is set to *Apple Intermediate Codec 1920x1080i60* before you create a new sequence.

  • Multiple displays with different resolutions

    The system is setup with two non-mirrored displays with the following resolutions: A) 1024x768 and B) 1280x1024 arranged as BA with A the menu'd display using an ATI 9000 Pro for Mac. During startup, approximately once inch worth of the menu's right items momentarily appear on the right side of display B 768 pixels down from the top. This problem only occurs in this BA configuration of differing resolutions and is independent of graphics cards (substituted the 9000 Pro with a mirror only AGP Navidia card and a mirror only PCI ATI Rage card combination which gave the same result). This problem first appeared using MacOS 10.3 which displayed several inches of menu instead of only an inch under MacOS 10.4. Anyone else seen this problem?
    Dual 800 MHz QuickSilver   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    Over the weekend, I explained this problem to one of the Apple Geniuses at an Apple store and then was able to duplicate the issue using a lap top and attached monitor in the store (not the same resolutions as my system; but, screens of similarly different resolutions). I raise this issue again because, as of late, additional things have been happening and I wonder if these are related to the core issue of an expanded desktop with two different screen resolutions. All of the widgets on the larger resolution screen desktop are drawing in the menu located in the smaller resolution screen when hitting the "i" to gain access to its control panel; however, not effecting the menu at all when moved to the smaller resolution screen. The other has to do with screen savers periodically blanking both monitors (as though the graphics card went to sleep) or having both monitors lose syncing (first occurrence today) where a cold start is required to bring the monitors on line again (I am going to have to figure out a way to test if the system is actually sleeping or the monitors have only gone blank before cold starting the system).

  • [SOLVED] Configure dual head with different resolutions xf86-video-ati

    I have 1680x1050 and 1280x1024 monitors which I would like to setup so that I have two displays (:0.0 and :0.1), i.e. can't drag a window to the other display, but can move the mouse from one screen to the next. The graphics card is Radeon HD 4850.
    At the moment I have one screen only, so I can't move the mouse from the first to the second screen, it is captive in the first screen.
    xrandr -q
    Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1680 x 1050, maximum 1680 x 1680
    HDMI-0 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
       1280x1024      60.0*+   75.0 
       1280x960       60.0 
       1152x864       75.0     70.0 
       1024x768       75.0     70.1     60.0 
       832x624        74.6 
       800x600        72.2     75.0     60.3     56.2 
       640x480        75.0     72.8     66.7     59.9 
       720x400        70.1 
    VGA-0 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 338mm x 270mm
       1280x1024      60.0*+   75.0 
       1280x960       60.0 
       1152x864       75.0     70.0 
       1024x768       75.0     70.1     60.0 
       832x624        74.6 
       800x600        72.2     75.0     60.3     56.2 
       640x480        75.0     72.8     66.7     59.9 
       720x400        70.1 
    DVI-0 connected 1680x1050+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 474mm x 296mm
       1680x1050      60.0*+
       1600x1200      60.0 
       1280x1024      75.0     60.0 
       1440x900       75.0     59.9 
       1280x960       60.0 
       1152x864       75.0 
       1280x720       60.0 
       1024x768       75.0     70.1     60.0 
       832x624        74.6 
       800x600        72.2     75.0     60.3     56.2 
       640x480        75.0     72.8     66.7     59.9 
       720x400        70.1 
    xorg.conf:
    Section "ServerLayout"
            Identifier     "dual head configuration"
            Screen      0  "Screen0" 0 0
            Screen         "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0"
            InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
            Load "glx"
            Load "dri"
            Load "drm"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    # keyboard added by rhpxl
            Identifier  "Keyboard0"
            Driver      "kbd"
            Option      "XkbModel" "pc105"
            Option      "XkbLayout" "us"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier   "Monitor0"
            Option      "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
            Option      "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
            Option      "DPMS" "true"
            DisplaySize 444 277
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier   "Monitor1"
            Option      "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
            Option      "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
            Option      "DPMS" "true"
            DisplaySize 339 271
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
            Identifier  "Videocard0"
            Driver      "radeon"
            BusID       "PCI:2:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
            Identifier  "Videocard1"
            Driver      "radeon"
            BusID       "PCI:2:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
            Identifier "Screen0"
            Device     "Videocard0"
            Monitor    "Monitor0"
            DefaultDepth     24
            SubSection "Display"
                    Viewport   0 0
                    Depth     24
                    Modes    "1680x1050"
            EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
            Identifier "Screen1"
            Device     "Videocard1"
            Monitor    "Monitor1"
            DefaultDepth     24
            SubSection "Display"
                    Viewport   0 0
                    Depth     24
                    Modes    "1280x1024"
            EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Xorg.0.log:
    (==) ServerLayout "dual head configuration"
    (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0)
    (**) |   |-->Monitor "Monitor0"
    (**) |   |-->Device "Videocard0"
    (**) |-->Screen "Screen1" (1)
    (**) |   |-->Monitor "Monitor1"
    (**) |   |-->Device "Videocard1"
    (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0"
    It doesn't look as if xrandr can help as it reports a maximum virtual desktop of 1680x1680.
    Because the two monitors are different resolutions I don't know if a single screen is the answer.
    I used to have two displays/screens configured to two different resolutions matching the monitors using the catalyst driver but can't get it working using the xf86-video-ati driver.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Willem
    Last edited by Willem (2010-01-02 20:42:41)

    Thanks, with your help I was able to get it working.
    The xorg.conf relevant sections:
    Section "ServerLayout"
            Identifier     "dual head configuration"
            Screen      0  "Screen0" 0 0
            InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier   "Monitor0"
            Option      "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
            Option      "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
            Option      "DPMS" "true"
            DisplaySize 444 277
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier   "Monitor1"
            Option      "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
            Option      "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
            Option      "DPMS" "true"
            DisplaySize 339 271
            Option      "RightOf" "Monitor0"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
            Identifier  "Videocard0"
            Driver      "radeon"
            BusID       "PCI:2:0:0"
            Option "Monitor-HDMI-0" "Monitor0"
            Option "Monitor-DVI-0" "Monitor1"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
            Identifier "Screen0"
            Device     "Videocard0"
            Monitor    "Monitor0"
            DefaultDepth     24
            SubSection "Display"
                    Viewport   0 0
                    Depth     24
                    Virtual 2960 1050
            EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Would still be interested to get a seperate display for each monitor working though.

  • I see the same photos with different resolutions in my iPhoto library

    I am trying to organize my photos in the iPhoto library by deleting those are stored twice or more. However in many doubles I found out that some of them exist in my library in different resolutions. My photos are imported either from my camera, or from my iphone, or from my iPad or from the shared photo streams which include photos imported from various apple devices.
    What I see for example is some photos taken from an iPhone exist in both 2048x1536 and in 3264x2448 resolution and some others in 1224x1632 and in 1536x2048 (I guess these 2 resolytions are for the vertically taken thotos while the other 2 for orizontical).  For iPad photos I see 2056x1536 and 2592x1936 for the same photos. All doubles have different names (eg. IMG_007 and IMG_1056 for the same photo). Furthermore some doubles include info about the camera (eg. iPad back camer 4.28mm f/2.4) and some others don´t (only info about the device eg. iPad).
    Why is this mess happening in my library? Apparently I want to keep in my library the photos only in the maximum available resolution for better quality.
    In relation to that I have the following questions:
    1. When a photo or a video is shared in a photo stream, is its resolution decreased to a lower one?
    2. Is there any way to see what the resolution is of the original photo stored in the iPhone or iPad, so that I can compare with the the same ones I have on my computer´s iPhoto library?
    3. Is there any way to see the resolution and other info for the Photos in a shared Photo stream which are not yet imported localy on my computer?
    Thanks in advance.

    Happy New Year to all!
    I made a test and I confirm what I was suspected at first place.
    I uploaded a photo taken from my iPhone to the shared photo stream. Then I imported this photo from the photo stream to my iPhoto library on my Mac. The resolution in which this photo is stored locally is 2048x1536 and its size 961 KB.
    Then I sent the same photo from my iPhone via e-mail. I opened the email on my computer and downloaded the photo. Then I imported it to my Mac´s  iPhoto library. I checked the info out and the resolution is now 3264x2448 and size 2.2 MB.
    Therefore the quality and resolution of the photos that are uploaded to the icloud photo stream is NOT the same as the original one.
    I don´t know whether there is somewhre an option to change that, but this is what happens to me right now.

  • Same Sequence# with different applied value in v$archived_log

    Hi everyone,
    I have an issue with one of the dataguard servers here.
    Basically, looking at the v$managed_standby, it is still applying the latest archived log sequence.
    However when I checked for unapplied archived log from v$archived_log, I found at least 1 sequence# which was quite old (around a few days old) not applied.
    my query to check this is:
    SELECT sequence# from v$archived_log where applied = 'NO';result:
    SEQUENCE#
        40154
        40546with a different query I found an interesting result
    select sequence#, recid, stamp, status, applied from v$archived_log where sequence# in (40154, 40546);result:
    SEQUENCE#      RECID      STAMP S APP
        40154       8093  777156019 D NO
        40154       8095  777156053 D YES
        40546       8486  777673729 D NO
        40546       8487  777673734 D YESAt the time I ran this query, the v$managed_standby are as follow:
    select process, status, sequence# from v$managed_standby;result:
    PROCESS   STATUS        SEQUENCE#
    ARCH      CLOSING           40562
    ARCH      CLOSING           40557
    MRP0      APPLYING_LOG      40563
    RFS       IDLE                  0
    RFS       IDLE              40563A simple solution to get those un-applied archived log to be applied is to restart the standby database instance.
    Another finding from the production database:
    select recid, stamp, sequence#, creator, registrar, standby_dest from v$archived_log where sequence# in (40154, 40546);result:
    RECID      STAMP  SEQUENCE# CREATOR REGISTR STA
    45446  777156011      40154 ARCH    ARCH    NO
    45447  777156017      40154 LGWR    LGWR    YES
    45450  777156051      40154 ARCH    ARCH    YES
    46231  777673709      40546 ARCH    ARCH    NO
    46232  777673728      40546 LGWR    LGWR    YES
    46233  777673733      40546 ARCH    ARCH    YESThe question is of course, why is this happening?
    Can this be prevented?
    Thank you,
    Adhika

    CKPT wrote:
    I have an issue with one of the dataguard servers here.
    Basically, looking at the v$managed_standby, it is still applying the latest archived log sequence.
    However when I checked for unapplied archived log from v$archived_log, I found at least 1 sequence# which was quite old (around a few days old) not applied.
    my query to check this is:
    SELECT sequence# from v$archived_log where applied = 'NO';result:
    SEQUENCE#
    40154
    40546
    Even if old archives applied or not, it will keep transfer the archivelogs from primary. Please confirm that you been executed above query in standby.. is it?Yes I ran it from the standby database
    CKPT wrote:
    with a different query I found an interesting result
    select sequence#, recid, stamp, status, applied from v$archived_log where sequence# in (40154, 40546);result:
    SEQUENCE#      RECID      STAMP S APP
    40154       8093  777156019 D NO
    40154       8095  777156053 D YES
    40546       8486  777673729 D NO
    40546       8487  777673734 D YES
    How many remote/standby destinations you have in your DR setup?
    Might this query you have executed in primary, You should always use DEST_ID when executing from primary (or) do check in standby database, Because the applied column you have to check in standby , If you see above the same sequence showing applied in one destination & not applied on other instance, so please do select for dest_2 or in standby.I have only 1 standby destination.
    The query above was executed in the standby database server as well as to show that the same sequence# has different result in the applied column.
    CKPT wrote:
    The question is of course, why is this happening?
    Can this be prevented?What is your Online redo log file size (or) how much average archive log file size?
    This issue happens when Network glitch while transferring archives from primary to standby RFS , So when is big enough in such conditions it will be in status can be WAIT_FOR_LOG.
    BTW, which redo transport you are using? -- recommended to use LGWR
    Is there any network problem?
    check for exact problem either from primary alert log file or from below query,
    SQL> select severity,error_code,message,to_char(timestamp,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') from v$dataguard_status;
    SQL> select sequence#, to_char(completion_time,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') from v$archived_log where sequence# in (40154, 40546);
    HTH.The redolog file size is 100MB and so does the archive log file size.
    I'm using LGWR ASYNC
    these are the result of the query which I modified slightly:
    query:
    select severity,error_code,message,to_char(timestamp,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') from v$dataguard_status where message like '%40154%' or message like '%40546%';result:
    SEVERITY ERROR_CODE MESSAGE                                                                                              TIMESTAMP
    Warning           0 LNS: Standby redo logfile selected for thread 1 sequence 40546 for destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2    11-MAR-2012 20:28:44
    Warning           0 ARC1: Standby redo logfile selected for thread 1 sequence 40546 for destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2   11-MAR-2012 20:28:49The message for the 40154 must have been purged.
    It appeared to me that sequence 40546 has been sent twice, by LNS and ARC1.
    query:
    select sequence#, registrar, creator, standby_dest, dest_id, to_char(completion_time,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') completion_time from v$archived_log where sequence# in (40154, 40546);result:
    SEQUENCE# REGISTR CREATOR STA    DEST_ID COMPLETION_TIME
        40154 ARCH    ARCH    NO           1 05-MAR-2012 20:40:11
        40154 LGWR    LGWR    YES          2 05-MAR-2012 20:40:17
        40154 ARCH    ARCH    YES          2 05-MAR-2012 20:40:51
        40546 ARCH    ARCH    NO           1 11-MAR-2012 20:28:29
        40546 LGWR    LGWR    YES          2 11-MAR-2012 20:28:48
        40546 ARCH    ARCH    YES          2 11-MAR-2012 20:28:53This query proved that the primary database is actually trying to send twice with a different completion time.
    Why does the primary database has to send twice?
    Thanks for replying,
    Adhika

  • Help! Resizing different documents with different resolutions?

    Hello!
    Please help me with my situation:
    I was trying to make an action that will decrease 1 inch to all sides of my document (the document size was 12x36 inches) and hopefully to other documents.  I don't want to crop the image, I just want to resize the whole image to 10x24 inches, leaving a 1 inch transparent border (the gray and white checkerboard) to my document. I started resizing manually, but it was time-consuming so I tried to make the action I stated above. I was expecting that it would decrease a proportionate 1 inch to the top, bottom, left and right sides of other documents, but it didn't. Any procedure to make this happen in different documents with different sizes and resolutions?
    PS: All the the documents that I will resize would eventually be printed ( I don't know if this would help).
    Thank you for your help!

    Kursover wrote:
    I was trying to make an action that will decrease 1 inch to all sides of my document (the document size was 12x36 inches) and hopefully to other documents. I don't want to crop the image, I just want to resize the whole image to 10x24 inches, leaving a 1 inch transparent border (the gray and white checkerboard) to my document. I was expecting that it would decrease a proportionate 1 inch to the top, bottom, left and right sides of another document, but it didn't. Any procedure to make this happen in different documents with different sizes and resolutions?
    Easy to do in a script not so easy in an action unless you know that there is no background layer or that all have backgounds.  You can not add transparent canvas to a document with a background layer for brckground layers do not support transparence. Documents may or mant not have a background layer and background layers can be converted to a normal layer.  Actions can not use logic without using a script to see if there is a background.  My Crafting Actions package contains a utility script for actions that will convert background layers to a normal layer should a document have a background layer. Once you know there is no "Background" the rest is easy to do in an action with menu limage canvas size check relative and set width and height to 1" the will add 1"
    Decreasing -1" will CROP any layer the has not transparent pixels in the outter 1"
    Crafting Actions Package
    Contains
    Action Actions Palette Tips.txt
    Action Creation Guidelines.txt
    Action Dealing with Image Size.txt
    Action Enhanced via Scripted Photoshop Functions.txt
    CraftedActions.atn Sample Action set includes an example Watermarking action
    Sample Actions.txt Photoshop CraftedActions set saved as a text file.
    A script can retrieve the width and height of a document to changs size you need to resize the document this will not crop but will resample and you most matain aspect ratio elss resize will distort. Decreasing canvas size may crop...
    12 Scripts for actions
    Example
    Download

  • Bridge_How Fit-to-Screen with different resolution pictures in Fullscreen/Slideshow

    Hallo,
    I´m looking for a solution for my following problem:
    I have several photographs in totally different resolutions. Some are pretty small, some are huge.
    I want to show them with Bridge in FullScreen-Preview or maybe as a slideshow.
    How can i bring them all to fit the whole screen, even if the resolution is to small to fit regularly.
    In other words, is there an option for dynamic zooming to bring every frame to FIT the Screen, regardless which resolution it got?
    I discovered "scale to fit" in the slideshow options, but it doesnt work for me.
    An zooming every file in the right position and size is not an option.
    Im sure Bridge is able to do it, beacause even IrfanView and ApplePreview are able. But where to find this option?
    Can anybody help?
    Thank you a lot
    best regards
    madlo

    As far as I know, Bridge will not enlarge small images. If you hit '+' on fullscreen preview, it zooms in, but keeps the same zoom for every image.

  • Auto-Detect Screen Resolution Does Not Work Across Multiple Monitors With Different Resolutions

    Hi,
    The Acrobat Pro DC (15.007.20033.2203) auto-detect screen resolution feature does not work with multiple monitors at different resolutions.  Acrobat looks fine on my hidpi primary laptop display (Razr 14" 2014) but is completely unusable if I drag or extend the application to a standard HD resolution secondary monitor. Dragging Acrobat from my primary desktop display to the secondary display causes the UI elements to become 2x as large as they should be and makes Acrobat unusable. 
    Is there a way to make Acrobat auto-detect the display that it is currently on? 
    Thanks!
    -Donald

    To prevent it from happing again, you can
    1. go to the Mouse preference and turn off the scroll zoom feature.
    2. go to the Universal Access preference and disable the zoom features.

Maybe you are looking for