CSM - slb-policy not being honored

We have a vserver that I set up on a CSM - running v 4.2(9). There is a default serverfarm and an SLB-POLICY that uses an url-map and a different serverfarm. It appears that once the initial connection is made to the default serverfarm any requests that should match the url-map still end up going to that default serverfarm and not the new serverfarm. We are not running persistent rebalance as the application on the default serverfarm will not load the web pages properly. Note there are no sticky configuration parameters with this vserver. Thanks in advance for any help.

P.S. If a url is entered into a new browser that matches the url-map, that request is switched to the correct serverfarm. So to go back and forth between the matched url's and non-matched (default serverfarm) the browser must be closed and and a new one opened (at least this is how Internet Explorer 6 is responding).

Similar Messages

  • NoViewOnDrive Setting not being honored in Common Save Dialog

    To restrict access to my C: drive from users using the Common Open/Save dialog, I set the decimal value of the
    NoViewOnDrives registry key to 4. This works well generally and if a user types in c:\ they get a message indicating that such access is redistricted. However, if they enter in c:\users\%username%, it brings them to their profile folder and
    allows them to save (naturally as they have write access to their profile). 
    Q: Why is the NoViewOnDrives setting not being honored for C:\users\%username% yet it is for other paths such as C:\ and C:\users ?

    Hi shocko,
    Based on my test, the scenerio is as you stated. We can access the profile via inputing c:\users\%username%and can creare and save new file. Although you Prevent access to drives from My Computer, users still have right to save files to their
    user profiles. 
    The easy way to prevent users to save data on a location is set folder redirection policy, redirect users’ desktop to a network share where users don’t have write permission.
    Create a network share on your server, but don’t grant write permission for domain users group.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Lany Zhang

  • Tip for Mail certificates not being honored for parked domains

    I was having trouble with certificates not being honored, such that when my imap mail was being checked I constantly had the warning box come up to tell me the certificate was not valid. I would show the certificate, tell it to be trusted always, and yet I'd still see the triangle warning next to my inbox, and have trouble connecting. Then I saw a post about having multiple domains pointed to the same server, so I forwarded from one domain to the other and now the certificate is honored.
    The other domain I had was parked at the same domain by my host, so the underlying imap server domain was the same for both. That must have caused a conflict in having both certificates be honored, and indeed only one of them at a time would work. Deleting one of the accounts solved the problem, though I had to set up forwarding to bring all my mail from one to the other.
    While the problem is solved, it seems like there ought to be a way that I can have mail to my main domain and parked domain using the same underlying domain imap server not cause this conflict, but in the meantime I'll just have to forward from the parked to the main domain.
    Just wanted to share the solution here.

    Alex Thanks for the reply
    my entry in amavisd.conf reads as follows:
    @localdomainsmaps = ( [".$mydomain"] ); # list of all local domains
    I thought this was supposed to pick up all the local aliases?
    What does changing to ( 1 ); do differently to above??
    TIA
    Tony

  • Policy not being applied to users

    I have a group policy that used to work, but now has decided it does not want to be applied to the workstations anymore. I don't know what may have happened to make is stop working.
    It's a pretty restrictive policy for students. I have the exact same policy for two other groups of students that still work. All three policies were copied from the same set of files. In other words, I make a change to one, then copy the files to the other two because they reside on different servers. Yes, I do open each one in C1 to update the timestamp.
    When I run wmsched, the policy is there in the list, but the settings are not applied. I can log in to the PC with one of the other student accounts and their policy is applied.
    The login I'm using to test with has R rights to the policy location - the same rights that the other users have to their policies. I have also tried more rights with no different results.
    The DLU part of the policy runs, and I have turned off the windows firewall. I have also created a brand new policy from scratch to rule out any corruption in the old policy and I get the same results.
    Apparantly, my workstation policy for this group is not being applied either. The other two groups' policies apply like they are supposed to. So this means that neither policy assigned to this group of students/workstations is working.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks

    FishEggStew,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • Group Policy not being pushed out

    HI,
    I have a problem with Group Policy updates.  The domain controllers are Server 2008 R2 and the clients are all Windows 7 64bit.  It looks like the clients are not updating their group policies.  We've recently added a certificate for our new
    corporate wifi.  During testing we used gpupdate /force and the computers installed the certificates.  It has been several weeks since the GP was published and we have announced the new wifi.  Users are still being prompted to accept the certificate
    even though they should have received it from the GP.  If I try to do a RSOP, of a users computer, I get "The RPC Server is unavailable"  Any ideas on how to fix this?
    Thanks
    Ron Soulliard
    Ron Soulliard Systems Administrator Polaris Ventures

    Group Policy is always retrieved by the clients. If a client sees a new GPO that is applicable to them, it will grab it and apply it.
    In the GPMC, can you run a GPResult for a computer that hasn't gotten the GPO? You might also want to check out this list of common GP issues:
    http://deployhappiness.com/top-10-ways-to-troubleshoot-group-policy/
    If my answer helped you, check out my blog:
    DeployHappiness. Subscribe by
    RSS or
    email. 

  • Warranty not being honored

    Toshiba is not honoring warranty contracts in Argentina (and it looks like some people have the same problem in other countries). Teknaria, the official service provider, a computer parts wholesaler as they say in their own site, cannot get hold of a motherboard for my laptop, which has been at their office for more than two months. They cannot give me any estimate on when it will be repaired, it could be months. The irritating "robots" at the Toshiba call center keep telling me my own details and the "I-know-how-you-feel" stuff every single time I call. After 2 months, Teknaria would now lend me an old computer just to keep my mouth shut. After having purchased three Toshiba laptops, this is my last time. Pathetic, infuriating service. And please, do not send me back to the LATINO Toshiba customer service!!! Is there any way to skip them -as they have been totally useless-?

    There are no Customer Service reps here in the forums, but if you send me a Private Message with your laptop's serial number and your contact information (email and phone number) I'll be happy to forward that information along with the text of your post to Latin American service management.
    Click here to send me a Private Message.
    Jim

  • Content security policy not being respected

    The following (seemingly valid) Content Security Policy does not work in Safari:
    script-src 'unsafe-eval' 'self' by.uservoice.com widget.uservoice.com www.google.com use.typekit.net js.stripe.com  localhost:35739
    Errors occur for a number of requests to the permitted services, including e.g.:
    Refused to load the script 'https://js.stripe.com/v1/?_=1398952171104' because it violates the following Content Security Policy directive: "script-src 'unsafe-eval' 'self' by.uservoice.com widget.uservoice.com www.google.com use.typekit.net js.stripe.com  localhost:35739".

    Thanks for your reply gdgmac.
    Is there no easier way to do this?
    I understand I could backup, reset, then restore, but I was hoping there was some easier way.
    Out of curiosity, is this as-per-design?
    Many thanks for your help again,
    Chris

  • SetAutoScrolls not being honored in JEditorPane & subclasses.

    From the JavaDocs on this property states that the "component automatically scrolls its contents when dragged (when contained in a component that supports scrolling, like JViewport"
    The problem I have encountered (and been completely unable to find anything to solve it in the forums/google/google groups) is that setting this property to 'false' does nothing.
    What I am trying to do is have a (JEditor/JText)Pane inside of a JScrollPane that will only scroll when the scroll bars are used. This means that when you select text inside of the JEditorPane and drag down to select more text that the JScrollPane does not scroll down.
    This means that the view of the text document is fixed and does not move no matter how you select the text and move the mouse in the application it will not scroll unless you use the scroll bars.
    The problem is it keeps scrolling, even when calling setAutoScroll(false) on EVERY JComponent that is ever instantiated and then explicitly calling it on EVERY JScrollPane.getViewport() in the JVM just to be certain.
    I don't have any sample code to post because it is pretty trivial.
    //Create Editor Pane
    //Set text of editor pane to something really long so you have to scroll
    //add to a JScrollPane
    //show on screen

    Hi shocko,
    Based on my test, the scenerio is as you stated. We can access the profile via inputing c:\users\%username%and can creare and save new file. Although you Prevent access to drives from My Computer, users still have right to save files to their
    user profiles. 
    The easy way to prevent users to save data on a location is set folder redirection policy, redirect users’ desktop to a network share where users don’t have write permission.
    Create a network share on your server, but don’t grant write permission for domain users group.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Lany Zhang

  • Maintenance Windows are not being honored - SCCM 2012 R2

    I have a TS that runs a command to reboot our systems, and this TS is deployed to a test device collection with the following settings:
    - Deployment settings: Install and required
    - Deployment schedule: every 1 hour
    - Rerun behavior: Always rerun program
    The test device collection has the following maintenance windows set:
    - Recurrence: Weekly
    - Recur every: Saturday
    - Start time: 2am
    - End time: 3am
    - Apply this schedule to: Task sequences
    Despite the maintenance window, my test machine is getting rebooted every hour. Am I missing anything here?
    Thanks.

    I did but there's not much there as to why the MW is being ignored
    Mandatory execution requested for program * and advertisement PS120015 execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    Creating mandatory request for advert PS120015, program *, package PS10006A execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    The created request is a Task Sequence request execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    Execution Request for advert PS120015 package PS10006A program * state change from NotExist to WaitingDependency execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    Raising client SDK event for class CCM_Program, instance CCM_Program.PackageID="PS10006A",ProgramID="*", actionType 1l, value , user NULL, session 4294967295l, level 0l, verbosity 30l execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    An existing MTC token was not supplied, using ExecutionRequest's Id as MTC token and this execution request is the owner of resultant MTC task. execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    Request a MTC task for execution request of package PS10006A, program * with request id: {C67D2DA3-4BE8-49A9-9989-F4CC8D5BBED3} execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    Execution Request for advert PS120015 package PS10006A program * state change from WaitingDependency to Ready execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    Raising client SDK event for class CCM_Program, instance CCM_Program.PackageID="PS10006A",ProgramID="*", actionType 1l, value , user NULL, session 4294967295l, level 0l, verbosity 30l execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2648 (0x0A58)
    MTC task with id {C67D2DA3-4BE8-49A9-9989-F4CC8D5BBED3}, changed state from 0 to 4 execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    MTC signaled SWD execution request with program id: *, package id: PS10006A for execution. execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Sending ack to MTC for task with id: {C67D2DA3-4BE8-49A9-9989-F4CC8D5BBED3} execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Executing program  in Admin context execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Execution Request for advert PS120015 package PS10006A program * state change from Ready to NotifyExecution execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Raising client SDK event for class CCM_Program, instance CCM_Program.PackageID="PS10006A",ProgramID="*", actionType 1l, value , user NULL, session 4294967295l, level 0l, verbosity 30l execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Executing program as a task sequence. execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Executing TS Program execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)
    Task Sequence started execmgr 3/7/2014 12:00:00 PM 2556 (0x09FC)

  • $50 trade for working tablet not being honored at store #468

    Same issues as others are having:
    West Paterson, NJ (Store 468)
    30 Andrews Dr
    Woodland Park, NJ 07424
    Phone: 973-294-1030
     I have a generic brand Android tablet. The associate at the store kept saying that this model number was not in the system and couldn't be accepted for a trade-in. I asked to speak to the manager and he told me the same thing. Afterwards, I called corporate customer service and received the same response for a third time. All the while, I reminded them of the words "any working tablet" and "guaranted minimum", with no success. I don't know why so many people are having this problem.
    Looks like BB is losing another customer.

    Hi drewbagel423,
    I appreciate you registering on the forums and sharing your concerns with us in regards to our current $50 tablet trade-in promotion. However, I do regret hearing that you were unable to take advantage of this promotion, even after speaking with multiple associates. Furthermore, I sincerely apologize for the experience you had at our West Patterson location, especially if you were turned away when you may have otherwise been eligible for the promotion.
    Per the terms of the promotion, seen here, as long as your tablet powers on, does not have a cracked screen or water damage, and isn’t a Barnes and Noble Nook based e-reader, your tablet should be eligible for the $50 Best Buy gift card.
    If your tablet meets these requirements, I suggest returning to the store and having them take another look at this as today is the last day of the promotion. Please consult further leadership if you run into any issues and they should be able to assist.
    Thanks for sharing your feedback with us on the forums.
    Brian|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • /etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist.conf NOT being honored [SOLVED]

    Topic says it all:
    $ cat /etc/modprobe.d/nouveau_blacklist_ck.conf
    blacklist nouveau
    $ lsmod | grep nouv
    nouveau 709777 0
    ttm 54808 1 nouveau
    drm_kms_helper 25753 1 nouveau
    drm 185576 3 nouveau,ttm,drm_kms_helper
    i2c_algo_bit 5199 1 nouveau
    mxm_wmi 1425 1 nouveau
    video 11133 1 nouveau
    i2c_core 19495 6 nouveau,drm_kms_helper,drm,i2c_algo_bit,nvidia,i2c_i801
    button 4406 1 nouveau
    Last edited by graysky (2011-11-24 13:37:34)

    Hold on guys.... the problem seems to be xorg.  If I boot runlevel 3, no nouveau.  As soon as I start X:
    $ grep -i nouveau /var/log/Xorg.0.log
    [ 60.195] (==) Matched nouveau as autoconfigured driver 0
    [ 60.195] (II) LoadModule: "nouveau"
    [ 60.196] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so
    [ 60.198] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 60.241] (II) NOUVEAU driver
    [ 60.241] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
    But it is the nvidia modules that I am using:
    $ grep -i nvidia /var/log/Xorg.0.log
    [ 60.192] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
    [ 60.192] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 290.10 Wed Nov 16 18:01:24 PST 2011
    [ 60.195] (==) Matched nvidia as autoconfigured driver 2
    [ 60.212] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
    [ 60.212] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
    [ 60.219] (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
    [ 60.241] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
    [ 60.242] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 290.10 Wed Nov 16 17:41:10 PST 2011
    [ 60.242] (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs
    [ 60.422] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
    [ 60.423] (II) NVIDIA(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section
    [ 60.423] (==) NVIDIA(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32
    [ 60.423] (==) NVIDIA(0): RGB weight 888
    [ 60.423] (==) NVIDIA(0): Default visual is TrueColor
    [ 60.423] (==) NVIDIA(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
    [ 60.423] (**) NVIDIA(0): Enabling 2D acceleration
    [ 61.535] (II) NVIDIA(GPU-0): Display (Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)) does not
    [ 61.535] (II) NVIDIA(GPU-0): support NVIDIA 3D Vision stereo.
    [ 61.536] (II) NVIDIA(0): NVIDIA GPU GeForce GTS 450 (GF106) at PCI:1:0:0 (GPU-0)
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Memory: 1048576 kBytes
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): VideoBIOS: 70.06.1f.00.21
    [ 61.536] (II) NVIDIA(0): Detected PCI Express Link width: 16X
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Interlaced video modes are supported on this GPU
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Connected display device(s) on GeForce GTS 450 at PCI:1:0:0
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2): 330.0 MHz maximum
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): pixel clock
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2): Internal Dual
    [ 61.536] (--) NVIDIA(0): Link TMDS
    [ 61.574] (**) NVIDIA(0): Using HorizSync/VertRefresh ranges from the EDID has been
    [ 61.574] (**) NVIDIA(0): enabled on all display devices.
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1280x720" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1280x720".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "720x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode "720x576".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "720x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode "720x576".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "720x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode "720x576".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1280x720" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1280x720".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1920x1080" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid HorizSync range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (30.000-83.000 kHz) would exclude this mode's HorizSync
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (28.1 kHz); ignoring HorizSync check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1920x1080".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1920x1080" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1920x1080".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1440x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1440x576".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1440x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1440x576".
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1920x1080" is specified in the
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.574] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1920x1080".
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1280x720" is specified in the
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1280x720".
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "720x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.575] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode "720x576".
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "720x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode "720x576".
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "720x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.576] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode "720x576".
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1280x720" is specified in the
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1280x720".
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1920x1080" is specified in the
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid HorizSync range
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (30.000-83.000 kHz) would exclude this mode's HorizSync
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (28.1 kHz); ignoring HorizSync check for mode
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1920x1080".
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1920x1080" is specified in the
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.577] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1920x1080".
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1440x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1440x576".
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1440x576" is specified in the
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1440x576".
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): The EDID for Ancor Communications Inc ASUS MS228 (DFP-2)
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): contradicts itself: mode "1920x1080" is specified in the
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): EDID; however, the EDID's valid VertRefresh range
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (55.000-75.000 Hz) would exclude this mode's VertRefresh
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): (50.0 Hz); ignoring VertRefresh check for mode
    [ 61.578] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "1920x1080".
    [ 61.598] (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: DFP-2
    [ 61.598] (==) NVIDIA(0):
    [ 61.598] (==) NVIDIA(0): No modes were requested; the default mode "nvidia-auto-select"
    [ 61.598] (==) NVIDIA(0): will be used as the requested mode.
    [ 61.598] (==) NVIDIA(0):
    [ 61.598] (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes:
    [ 61.598] (II) NVIDIA(0): "nvidia-auto-select"
    [ 61.598] (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1920 x 1080
    [ 61.620] (--) NVIDIA(0): DPI set to (101, 101); computed from "UseEdidDpi" X config
    [ 61.620] (--) NVIDIA(0): option
    [ 61.620] (II) NVIDIA: Using 3072.00 MB of virtual memory for indirect memory
    [ 61.620] (II) NVIDIA: access.
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): ACPI: failed to connect to the ACPI event daemon; the daemon
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): may not be running or the "AcpidSocketPath" X
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): configuration option may not be set correctly. When the
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): ACPI event daemon is available, the NVIDIA X driver will
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): try to use it to receive ACPI event notifications. For
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): details, please see the "ConnectToAcpid" and
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): "AcpidSocketPath" X configuration options in Appendix B: X
    [ 61.623] (II) NVIDIA(0): Config Options in the README.
    [ 61.626] (II) NVIDIA(0): Setting mode "nvidia-auto-select"
    [ 61.711] (==) NVIDIA(0): Disabling shared memory pixmaps
    [ 61.711] (==) NVIDIA(0): Backing store disabled
    [ 61.711] (==) NVIDIA(0): Silken mouse enabled
    [ 61.711] (==) NVIDIA(0): DPMS enabled
    [ 61.711] (WW) NVIDIA(0): Option "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" requested "CRT", but no
    [ 61.711] (WW) NVIDIA(0): such display device could be found, or all display devices
    [ 61.711] (WW) NVIDIA(0): by that name are currently unavailable.
    [ 61.711] (WW) NVIDIA(0): Option "TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder" requested "TV", but no such
    [ 61.711] (WW) NVIDIA(0): display device could be found, or all display devices by
    [ 61.711] (WW) NVIDIA(0): that name are currently unavailable.
    [ 61.712] (II) NVIDIA(0): [DRI2] Setup complete
    [ 61.712] (II) NVIDIA(0): [DRI2] VDPAU driver: nvidia
    [ 61.787] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA NVidia HDMI/DP (/dev/input/event10)
    [ 61.787] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA NVidia HDMI/DP (/dev/input/event7)
    [ 61.788] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA NVidia HDMI/DP (/dev/input/event8)
    [ 61.788] (II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA NVidia HDMI/DP (/dev/input/event9)

  • Application Detection Method not being honored.

    We have a deployment of a patch for Lync 2010.  In the Detection Method we are using the path for communicator.exe and the version number.  We have a few systems testing Lync 2013.  The paths are completely different so we don't understand
    why these clients are getting prompted for installation of the update.
    The Detection Rule is a as follows:
    David Jenkins

    The path is there but no communicator.exe.  In 2013 it's part of MS Office so it's in the Office directories.
    I'd expect if communicator.exe doesn't exist in the directory it would mean the check fails and the patch would not advertise.
    I think you're getting tangled up with the logic at play here...
    If this detection rule is on your patch deployment, the logic is this:
    "if this path/file/version is not detected, then I must deploy this patch to this machine"
    So, on your machines that do have Lync2013, they will also *not* have the unpatched Lync2010 binary, therefore, it will attempt to deploy the patch.
    You could consider applying another detection rule (maybe *AND* Lync2013 is not present), or, flip your detection logic around, and instead, detect for the unpatched Lync2010 binary (i.e. if version is less than 4.0.7577.4409) ?
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • Subscription is not being honored

    today is 2/5/2012 my subscription is not do tilt march 1/2012 its still charging me for calls please HELP!!!

    If you exceed daily 6 hour limit then your subscription will be temporarily suspended till next day GMT time.
    More info about daily limits: http://www.skype.com/intl/en/legal/terms/fair_usage/
    Your subscription should be working by now again.
    Andre
    If answer was helpful please mark it with Kudos and if issue is resolved mark it with solution. This will help other users find this answer more easily. Thanks in advance!

  • Re: $50 minimum trade for working tablet not being honored

    I am having the same problem here in Brockton, Massachusetts. Yesterday morning I brought in an RCA tablet and was told that it is not on their list. I sat in my car and called Corporate and the representative called the store. She said that she was told the same thing by the store Manager however she knows there is a way to do it. She took my tel number and found my information she said she would be sending out some emails and then she would call me back. Still waiting on a solution though and that is fine. She seemed confident. It is unfair that we waste our time and gas money and get turned away when the ad clearly states any tablet except Nook or ereaders.

    Hi waw560,
    With new tablets coming out, we know people need an environmentally responsible way to dispose of their older model devices.  It’s one reason why many people are taking full advantage of our current Kindle Fire HD promotion. I have an older Kindle Fire model myself, and this offer has certainly made me think about trading it in for a shiny new one! It’s regrettable to hear that you've run into multiple snags when trying to recycle your current tablet, and I truly apologize for any frustration you endured while trying to resolve this on your own.
    As long as your tablet meets the minimum requirements of the promotion, then it doesn't matter whether or not the model is immediately recognized by our trade-in database.  There is a process in place to ensure customers are still able to receive the offer. Those minimum requirements are:
    -          The device must be able to power on
    -          Must have a valid serial number
    -          Cannot have a cracked screen
    -          Cannot have any liquid damage
    -          The device cannot be a Barnes & Noble Nook or other eReader
    Having said this, I noticed that you’re currently working with our customer service representative, Janine, and she’s collaborating with our Brockton store leadership for assistance. Please be aware that I’ve let her know that you’re looking for an update, and she should be calling you very soon.
    If you don’t hear from her, or if you have any further questions regarding this, feel free to let me know. I’ll be glad to help.
    Best wishes,
    Alex|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Motion "Field Order" setting not being honored by Final Cut Pro

    I was having a doozy of a time bringing Motion files into a Final Cut ProRes 4444 Timeline (the entire project is basically motion). While my field order in both Motion and my Final Cut sequence was set to none, Motion text and graphics became blurry once I dragged them into Final Cut. I finally realized that (after stumbling upon this post http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1967373) that Final Cut was resetting the field order of the Motion project to Upper. It was said in this post that this was a bug. As this post was from April 2009 and it seems to still be happening, I'm assuming the bug hasn't been fixed, but does anyone know of a workaround avoid having to go into each Motion file in the timeline and switching the field order manually? Thanks!

    AFAIK, you have to switch them manually. You can select multiple clips, do ⌘9, then in the multiple selection window, right click on the Field Dominance and one at a time, set it to None (or whatever you need). It's pretty quick.
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for

  • Transition effect no longer working

    Hello, I have searched all over, and have found no one to have the same exact issue. Not so long ago I was editing a movie using multiple camera angles and an audio source from one of the angles.  Did a lot of gradient transitions. Worked amazing. Fa

  • Where'd the 'bounce' feature go?

    I know some people complained about it, but I found bouncing mail messages worked great 99% of the time. I want my bounce back! Anyone have an idea how to re-activate it?

  • Using Intervals

    I want to have a button that when moused over, slowly fades to 100% alpha, and when moused off, fades back away to 0%. My code works fine if I mouseover the button, wait for it to fade all the way up, and then mouse off. If I quickly mouse over it an

  • Incorrect Registry Permissions?

    I have recently bought this new pc about week ago and since then I've been noticing that my regestry permissions are out of wack.  It all started when I realized I only had lock computer option when I used Ctrl+Alt+Delete. After that I've noticed my

  • External Hardrive shows up in Utility but not on desktop

    Hi folks. External hard-drive that used to show up fine (and was formatted for Mac prior to original use) does not show up on desktop or utility on my laptop. However, when I try it on a different computer it does show up on Utility but not on deskto