CSS 11500 and 301 redirect

Does anyone know if it is possible to do a 301 redirect as opposed to the 302 redirect in a CSS 11500?

Everything I have read and these forums indicate 302 only I am just wondering if anyone knows of a way to work around via script or possibly any CSS updates that can add 301 functionality.

Similar Messages

Cisco CSS 11500 and RDP

Dear NetPros:
Does anyone know that does Cisco CSS 11500 Series Content Services Switch support 'Session Caching of RDP Clients? session for roaming of disconnected sessions' features?
Thanks
Bernard

The Cisco CSS 11500 is a compact modular platform, specifically designed to provide robust Layer 4-7 traffic management services for e-business applications in Internet and intranet data centers.
This URl should help you:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns50/ns254/networking_solutions_package.html

Htaccess 404 and 301 redirect

I have a muse website hosted on windows azure.
I have created a .htaccess file and added o the root.
The webpage is still not redirecting to the 404 error page or my 301 redirect that i have set

Hi Kurian,
You can Go to Server Settings>>Settings>> Missing Template Handler and setup the same.
To use the missing template handler with IIS, the Custom Error page of your website must be configured to use the page. For this example, we'll assume a directory name of /errorpages and a file named missingtemplate.cfm. Therefore, the path to the missing template handler will be /errorpages/missingtemplate.cfm.
The steps below explain how to configure IIS to use the template for the Custom Error page:
1.          Right-click on the website in the IIS Management Console, then select Properties.
2.          Select the Custom Errors tab.
3.          Select the 404 in the HTTP Error column and click Edit Properties...
4.          Select URL from the Message type dropdown and enter /errors/missingtemplate.cfm in the URL text box.
5.          Click OK.
6.          Right-click on the website again and select Properties.
7.          Select the Home Directory tab and click the Configuration... button.
8.          Select .cfm from the list and click the Edit button.
9.          Check the "Check that file exists" checkbox.
10.          Restart IIS and the ColdFusion Server.
Regards,
Anit Kumar

"Canonical Issue" and 301 Redirecting?

Hi.
A SEO optimisation company has pointed out that our site
doesn't have a 301
Redirect which they state is required to avoid a "canonical
issue" with the
http://domain.com and
http://www.domain.com addresses
for our site. Out
host allows both to act as the address for the site but the
SEO company are
suggesting that this could lead to "duplicate penalties" with
Google?
I've never heard of this, can anyone shed any light on it, or
confirm/contest what the SEO are telling us?
If it is so bad, why is our host allowing it?
Thanks
Regards
Nath

Michael, will a .htaccess file work on a Windows server?
If not, is there a Windows alternative? I've uploaded the
following
.htaccess file to my Windows server but my SEO is still
telling me that
there is a problem:
<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^domain\.co.uk$ [NC]
RewriteRule .*
http://www.domain.co.uk
[L,R=301]
</IfModule>
Appreciate the assistance, thanks.
Nath.
"Michael Fesser" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
> .oO(gareth)
>
>>At the worst, the search engines can see it as two
different sites, ie
>>with
>>the same content at two different addresses, and will
slap a duplicate
>>content penalty on you. Doesn't happen to everyone,
but can happen.
>
> And it can become even worse if you don't watch your
links:
>
>
http://example.com/
>
http://www.example.com/
>
http://example.com/index.html
>
http://www.example.com/index.html
>
> Four different URLs, but in fact (usually) the same
resource. For SEO
> and cache-friendlyness that's a really bad thing.
>
>>The solution is to either change the httpd.conf file
(for apache) to do a
>>permanent redirect from domainname.com to
www.domainname, or if you don't
>>have access to your server configuration, create a
.htaccess file in the
>>root directory of your site containing:
>
> Personally I prefer the version without the leading
'www' (for nicer,
> shorter URLs), but YMMV.
>
>><IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
>>RewriteEngine on
>>RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^example\.com$ [NC]
>>RewriteRule .*
http://example.com/ [L,R=301]
>></IfModule>
>
> Just for the records my general version, also taking
into account the
> URL path, not only the host name:
>
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.(.*)$
> RewriteRule (.*)
http://%1/$1 [R=301,L]
>
> So
>
>
http://www.example.com/foo/bar
will become
http://example.com/foo/bar
>
> Micha

Business catalyst, muse and 301 redirects - help!

I have uploaded my muse website to business catalyst, using the free hosting service that adobe gives to CC subscribers.
However, under site manager, it only gives me two option (web forms and emails) and no ability to do url redirects etc.
Can anyone help? I urgently need to set up my 301 redirects

This might help as well :
Go to 'My Details', "Screen shot: http://project02.businesscatalyst.com/Jing/2013-0..." and check the option of 'Enable online content editing', "Screen shot: http://project02.businesscatalyst.com/Jing/2013-0..."

CSS 11500 url path rewrite and NAT

Hi,
We are evaluating a CSS 11500 and try to configure url path rewrite and NAT, but we have some problems.
What we would like to do is the following:
http://www.example.com/path1 -> http://host1:80
http://www.example.com/path2 -> http://host1:8080
http://www.example.com/path3 -> http://host2:80
The address www.example.com is resolving to a valid internet address, whereas host1 and host2 resolves to private IP addresses.
The client should always see the external url (e.g. http://www.example.com/path1/...) and the CSS should do the necessary translation.
Any help would be very much appreciated!
Regards,
Harald

Hello Experts, I'm new with this cisco stuff too(just got it 3 weeks ago), but here is some of my experience with cisco css 11501.
First : Service ServerName, there is a port setting here, but from my experience, I think it is related with KeepAlive option, so, port is alternate way to know if the server alive or not.
Second : When you send request to cisco css, the port option in content port will be the cisco css port to accept request, so, if you send a request to http://vip:8080/, all service must be in the same port too to balance the request, in this case, port 8080, if one service port 80, i'm sure the css will not hit the server.
Third : To solve your problem...
http://www.example.com/path1 -> http://host1:80 (ipA)
http://www.example.com/path2 -> http://host1:80 (ipB)
http://www.example.com/path3 -> http://host2:80
if you are lazy to buy new nic, just set subinterface/ip alias on the host1, and make the webserver only bind to specific address, not to all interface...
O yea, about your path1/path2/path3 -> /, hmm, i'm still asking in this forum about path changing cause until now, i haven't know how to do this, i know about apache rewrite module, and success do this, if only i know about this in cisco css too :-(
I'm sorry if I make mistake, I'm just telling my experience...

301 redirects and iWeb index page

Our site has grown and we will be changing our domain name and hosting co. (We are keeping the old domain active for a while at MME before we change domain name and hosting) I will need to redirect traffic for a while so as not to lose those who have just bookmarked us. Will just redirecting on the index page that iWeb creates (post publish) do that without creating a mess of our page rankings at Google? Currently we are in the top 15 responses for our search terms. Or should i create some other type of redirect? 301? (via cname or htaccess) will that ding me at google? Thanks- try to keep it as simple as possible - I don't code - I experiment and Apple has made it easy.
jy

What I would do is purchase the hosting and see if you can have more than one add-on domain. Most web hosts let you do this on one account so it doesn't cost you any more money. You are doing this because you will need a .htaccess file to set up your 301 redirects properly. This is what you should do;
1) Register your new domain and publish your site to it.
2) Create a webmaster tools account for BOTH your old and new domain name.
3) Create a 301 redirect for each individual page to the new corresponding page on your new domain. This can be done with a few lines in your .htaccess file. The file should be in your root folder of your OLD domain. Put this on your .htaccess file (NOTE: This assumes you will have the exact same website structure on the new domain);
RewriteEngine ON
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://mynewdomain.com/$1 \[R=301,L\]
OPTIONAL: Use Google's canonical tag on each one of your pages to avoid any issues with duplicate content. Link the old page to it's new corresponding page. This is optional but recommended if you can;
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.newdomain.com/newpage.html" />
4) Login to your Webmaster Tools account and select your OLD domain. Then select 'Site Configuration' and then 'change of address'. Follow the steps provided (which are basically what I told you above). Step 4 in there is the important one.
5) Submit a sitemap for your new website. This will make sure you know when Google has indexed your new website.
6) Important: Even though you have done everything properly there is a chance your rankings will change. To help prevent this, update as many third party links as you can to your new site. This won't be possible for all links since you won't have control over them but you should try contacting the website owners who have linked to you to update their links. You should also try getting new links to your new domain.
You can find all the sites you have linked to you by logging into your webmaster tools account and clicking your OLD domain. Then go to 'Your site on the web' and then to 'Links to your site'.
Nothing will be instant here, it will take a few days for everything to update but the above is the way Google recommends you do it.
HTH

Sorry Server for CSS 11500

Hi,
I have a question regarding sorry server configuration on the CSS 11500 series.
Is there a way for the sorry server to ignore the URL path and always send the user traffic to the "root" page (e.g. index.html) of the sorry server web server?
The problem I have is the redirection of the "root" page (url "/") that is configured for the normal traffic is causing the sorry page not to work since the URL path ("/psp/CUSTOMER1/?cmd=login") does not exist on the sorry page web server:
service Sorry-Server
protocol tcp
port 8000
keepalive type tcp
ip address 192.168.2.254
active
service server1
ip address 192.168.2.101
protocol tcp
keepalive type tcp
port 8080
active
service server2
ip address 192.168.2.102
protocol tcp
keepalive type tcp
port 8080
active
owner Customer1
content Content1
    vip address 192.168.1.101
    port 80
    protocol tcp
    url "/*"
    balance aca
    advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
    flow-timeout-multiplier 6
    add service server1
    add service server2
    primarySorryServer Sorry-Server
    active
content Content1-Redirect
    redirect "/psp/CUSTOMER1/?cmd=login"
    vip address 192.168.1.101
    port 80
    protocol tcp
    url "/"
    active
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best regards,
Harry

Hi again,
During a maintenance window I made the following change and that made things a bit better:
service Sorry-Server
type redirect
keepalive type none
redirect-string "192.168.2.254:8000"
active
However, since the redirect string points to a private address, Internet users are not able to access the URL.
As a work-around I sent the redirect to a new content rule with a public address and then configured a second sorry page server:
service Sorry-Server
type redirect
keepalive type none
redirect-string "sorry.example.com:8000"
active
service Sorry-Server-2
ip address 192.168.2.254
protocol tcp
port 8000
keepalive type tcp
active
owner Customer1
content Content2
    vip address x.x.x.x
    add service Sorry-Server-2
    port 8000
    protocol tcp
    active
Is there a better way to do this?
Best regards,
Harry

301 Redirect

I have a few years of Dreamweaver design experience and am
fairly well versed in html, css, etc. However, I have never had to
create a 301 redirect. I have purchased a .com and .org for a
non-profit site I am building and therefore, would like anyone who
types in the .com to be redirected to the .org. Any advice would be
greatly appreciated.

.oO(PeteC)
>cabett wrote:
>> I have a few years of Dreamweaver design experience
and am fairly
>> well versed in html, css, etc. However, I have never
had to create a
>> 301 redirect. I have purchased a .com and .org for a
non-profit site
>> I am building and therefore, would like anyone who
types in the .com
>> to be redirected to the .org. Any advice would be
greatly appreciated.
>
>Best to do that with a DNS alias - talk to your host.
No. That would lead to duplicate content. A 301 is the
correct way to
handle such things. On Apaches all it needs is a simple
directive in a
.htaccess file on the .com site (assuming that both sites are
hosted on
different servers or at least on different vhosts):
RedirectPermanent /
http://example.org/
If both domains resolve to the same server and the same
directory, then
it might require mod_rewrite to make sure that the redirect
is only
triggered when the .com is requested.
Micha

ADVICE needed --- use 301 Redirect or revert to HTM from HTML ?

Due to ignorance, I now have two versions of the same website online, the only difference being one is all HTM while the newer one is HTML
The original was built using DW MX2004 with all pages having an HTM extension while DW CS5.5 has all pages with an HTML extension.
Obviously I want to replace the old with the new but don't know how to.
Should I use a 301 redirect in the new folder and upload it with the relevant details ie. Redirect 301/index.htm http:// www.cumbria-dog-training.com/ index.html OR rename the new pages with an htm extension and hope that they've not been crawled yet ( they were uploaded 2 hours ago)
I'd be very grateful for any good advice as I'm staring into a rather dark hole at the moment.
Paull

Hi
Go into your dreamweaver preferences, (Edit - Preferences) and select the 'New Document' category, there you will see your default extension, change this to .htm and change any documents you have already created to the htm file type, (don't forget the dot before the htm file type).
On new sites you create, I would recommend changing this preference back to html for those sites.
PZ

Services with different IP address subnets over CSS 11500 series

Hi all folks!
I have two CSS 11500 series...
In just a few months i will have ready a DRS (Disaster Recovery Site), where i will have 2 more servers to add to the environment.
But this servers will be in a different subnet from that today i have for the servers who are configured in the current services of my CSS.
So then the doubt i arises is:
Is correct to add two new services with these servers, but using the IP addressing of the DRS site???, and including on the CSS a static route to this network, (of the DRS) in order to reach them?? is it correct, it will work well?
This would be so....
             ________________LAN to LAN_____________________
             |                                                                                |
             |                                                                                |
|------SITE A------|                                                        |------SITE B------|
     [Firewall] ===============IPSEC============= [Firewall]
           |                                                                                |
           |                                                                                |
[CSS-A]-[CSS-B]                                                            [SWITCH]
       |          |                                                                     |         |
     [SWITCH]                                                                    |         |
[srvA] [srvB] [srvC]                                                          [srvD] [srvE]
So, at [CSS-A] & B, i will put a static route to firewall that know the subnet of site B through the IPSEC tunnel.
So In the CSSs, i will add the new services for the Servers "D" & "E" with the IP address of Site B.
This should be seen as well:
!*************************** GLOBAL ***************************
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [IP FIREWALL]
ip route SITE B [IP FIREWALL]
!************************** SERVICE **************************
service srvA
ip address A.A.A.x
port 8080
service srvB
ip address A.A.A.x+1
port 8080
service srvC
ip address A.A.A.x+2
port 8080
service srvD
ip address B.B.B.y
port 8080
service srvE
ip address B.B.B.y+1
port 8080
I know that this practice is not the most desirable, in fact should use"Basic Global Server Load Balancing Site Redundancy Using the CSS with DNS", but I don't have much time to change the entire environment today, and in this first stage i have to begin with this poor but quick solution that i thought and i wanted to be validated if there is posibliidades this to work
Within their experiences that they say? Will operate?
Thanks in advance!
Regards!
Esteban =)

Daniel!
Sorry by delay!
Thank you so much for you time for reply.
You have given me a great help to this doubt!
But..using "source group" let me know..
I can´t undertand the really difference between NAT with ACls as you can see at this link: (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_tech_note09186a0080093dfc.shtml)
and
this other link, using NAT (from the piont 5), (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps789/products_configuration_example09186a0080093dff.shtml)
where the NAT is configured under a method different from the previous one..
So.. for this scenario described above, which would you recommend using? I would think that the second is the most indicated truth? What do you think?
Thanks in advance again!!!
Have nice day!
Regards.
Esteban.

Webmaster tools change of address 301 redirect failed using domain forward

I'm having trouble with webmaster tools recognising our domain name change.
We've recently updated website and done a name change from www.qldtshirt.com.au to www.qtco.com.au. I am using domain forwarding so qldtshirt.com.au forwards to qtco.com.au (aswell has with www.) and every thing works perfectly.
www.qldtshirt.com.au/products/polo-shirts/cool-dry-fabric forwards to:
http://www.qtco.com.au/products/clothing/polo-shirts/cool-dry-fabric
We have about 4000 301 redirects setup in URL Redirects:
/products/business-and-corporate/desk-and-office/100-organic-cotton-pencil-case to
/products/gifts-incentives/desk-and-office/100-organic-cotton-pencil-case
so on and so on....
I've verified all sites in webmaster tools however when change of address from www.qldtshirt.com.au to www.qtco.com.au webmaster tools presents this error:
"301 redirect failed. We detect that the root address of your old site (www.qldtshirt.com.au) does not yet redirect to the root address of your new site (www.qtco.com.au). For more information use the Fetch as Google tool."
It works perfectly fine for the end user, anyone know why and how to fix please?

Hi, I have found this same situation. Did you have any luck finding a solution?
Thank you

301 Redirections - Proper way to set up?

Hi - I have an quick and hopefully easy 301 redirect question.
Here is the duplicate title Notice from Webmaster Tools (and this is also showing duplicate content in SEOMoz).
So obviously I need to do a 301 redirect.
The top level menus on the site point to the /about version and not the index.html
the /index.html is NOT the one I want to use for the 301 if possible - does anyone have a suggestion for how to accomplish this?
Thanks!

Have you just tried doing the basic issue there and changed title tags?
Had someone ask this on the forums before and over complicating looking at 301's when they just changed names of items and page titles and fixed it
Not sure what you mean about /about etc.
If you have an about page you got several pages related to it? You have a dropdown menu? So you made a folder /about and the landing page index.html?
If not and it is just one page and you did that you do not need to. /about as a page is all you need.
You got to remeber that when you post on the forums you see all your information and sites, we do not so you need to be detailed or exact in your posts so we can get to the same pooint as you in our heads

CSS 11500:Client ip-address visible to the real server

Is it possible to keep the original ip-address of the client when the the css is redirecting the traffic to the real server. customer needs the client ip-address on the real server for reporting.
regards
Dietrich Schleyer

Dietrich,
by default the CSS will keep the original client ip address.
To have the CSS changing the client ip, your customer must have configured a group with 'add destination service'.
Probably because your client is using a one-armed setup which is the easiest to implement but the worst to use.
So, your customer should go to a 2-sides CSS design and have the traffic flow through the CSS without the need to do client nat.
Once the design is correct, you can remove the group and the CSS will keep the client ip address.
Regards,
Gilles.
Thanks for rating.

What is the appropriate product name for CSS 11500 on Bug Toolkit

Today I tried to search DDTs of CSS 11500 on Bug Toolkit (http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/home.pl), however I can not find out appropriate product name corresponding to CSS 11500.
Before I had searched DDTs of CSS 11500 on Bug Toolkit many times, at that time, if my memory correct..
I selected "Cisco CSS 11500 Series Content Services Switches" in the list of "Search for bugs in other Cisco software and hardware products" on Bug Toolkit.
But I can not find this product name today.
Do you know what product name appropriate for CSS 11500 on Bug Toolkit ?
Your information would be appreciated.
Best regards,

Hi Gilles,
Thank you for your cooperation.
Today, I can find the CSS at "new Bug Toolkit".
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/action.do?hdnAction=searchBugs
Select Product Category: Application Networking Services
Select Product: Cisco CSS 11000 Series Content Services
So I understand I should go "new Bug Toolkit" instead of old "Bug Toolkit" to
search any DDTs for CSS 11500.
Many thanks.
Best regards,

CSS 11500 and 301 redirect

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for