CSS differences in Explorer and firefox

http://www.captivationstudios.com/menutest1.html
Well its working! (er well at least I thought it was!) Silly
me I checked this the whole time with Mozilla and Opera, within
which of course it works perfectly with, I then went to check it
with Explorer and hey presto its not doing what it is supposed to
do!
I guess this could well be a general problem (checking it
with Explorer 6), it could also be that I have done something very
stupid in the construction, does anyone know of a way to remedy
this situation?
Thanks

What's it supposed to be doing? You've said nothing about the
problem you're
having with it. From just looking at the page in Firefox and
IE - I see no
difference, they both display the menu when hovered over.
What problem are you having? You need to explain yourself a
bit more to get
any help.
HTH, take care.
Shane H
[email protected]
http://www.avenuedesigners.com
=============================================
Proud GAWDS Member
http://www.gawds.org/showmember.php?memberid=1495
Delivering accessible websites to all ...
=============================================
"freddyfries" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:e89mbh$f2m$[email protected]..
>
http://www.captivationstudios.com/menutest1.html
>
> Well its working! (er well at least I thought it was!)
Silly me I checked
> this
> the whole time with Mozilla and Opera, within which of
course it works
> perfectly with, I then went to check it with Explorer
and hey presto its
> not
> doing what it is supposed to do!
>
> I guess this could well be a general problem (checking
it with Explorer
> 6), it
> could also be that I have done something very stupid in
the construction,
> does
> anyone know of a way to remedy this situation?
>
> Thanks
>
>

Similar Messages

Unable to load ITUNES onto PC HP, windows 7 Home Version. Error message reads "Application Application Support not found". "Unistall and reload". I have done that 4 times on Explorer and Firefox without success. Help??

Unable to load ITUNES onto PC HP, windows 7 Home Version. Error message reads "Application Application Support not found". "Uninstall and reload". I have done that 4 times on Explorer and Firefox without success. Help??

I had gotten a similar problem, except with "provider services", i believe, but i solved it by copying sqlite3.dll from E:\Program Files\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support to E:\Program Files\Common Files\Apple\Mobile Device Support. doing that solved my first problem, but now i have been getting the error described in this topic (unable to load dataclass info... etc.). i tried reinstalling itunes (i already had 9.1.1, and thats what i reinstalled) by using the method described on apples site (using the "remove programs" tool in the control panel) and then downloading and installing itunes. when i opened it again, i still got the same error, and just now i got an error saying "the instruction at "0x00aadb6b" referenced memory at "0x00000008". the memory could not be read" it gave me the option to cancel and debug, or to press ok and terminate the program. I tried pressing cancel, and the popup went away but nothing else happened. a minute later the popup was back, so i pressed ok and itunes quit. Upon opening Itunes again, i got the very same error. sorry for the long post, but its really been bugging me. thanks for any help you might give, and if you need anymore info, feel free to contact me.

What's the difference between Mozilla and Firefox

what's the difference between MOZILLA and FIREFOX?

Firefox doesn't include the SeaMonkey suite.<br />
SeaMonkey is a separate program (not just a browser, but a suite) maintained outside the Mozilla Corporation.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey
<blockquote>SeaMonkey is a free and open source[3] cross-platform Internet suite.<br />
It is the continuation of the former Mozilla Application Suite, based on the same source code.<br />
<br />
The development of SeaMonkey is community-driven, in contrast to the Mozilla Application Suite, which until its last released version (1.7.13) was governed by the Mozilla Foundation. The new project-leading group is the SeaMonkey Council.
</blockquote>

The new flash player update crashes internet explorer and firefox

The new flash player update crashes internet explorer and firefox, please send a new release to fix the problem ASAP!

ok   here's more mystery. i just uninstalled and reinstalled flash player using the adobe uninstaller and rebooting after each step. aqlso installed latest java. i started looking at videos and here are the ones that worked: you tube
                                                                                       imdb
                                                                                       hulu
                                                                                       ebaumsworld
                                  here are the ones that didn't work:    yahoo
                                                                                       msn
                                                                                       reuters
                                here are the ones that partially worked: the blaze (works on videos that originate from you tube, but not from news stories)
                                                                                          bing (work on videos from their video section - entertainment type, but not from news videos)
the common thing here seems to be that news type videos crash and entertainment type don't. also videos seem more likely to crash on internet portals like yahoo

Internet Explorer and FireFox do not support Go To A Page View links

Internet Explorer and FireFox do not support Go To A Page View links between PDFs created with Acrobat 8 Professional. Safari does support the links. Similar problem on both PC and Mac.
Two possible errors occur: (1) the error message “page not found”; or (2) nothing at all happens – the reader does not leave the page.
Do you have any suggestions?

Check the target field in the Firefox desktop shortcut and make sure that you do not start Firefox with the -no-remote switch or have set the environment variable MOZ_NO_REMOTE=1 (Control Panel > System > Advanced > Environment variables).
Always make sure to start at least the default profile without the -no-remote command line switch.
If you need to have more than one profile open at the same time then start subsequent instances with the -no-remote command line switch.
You can not send links from other programs to a Firefox instance that is started with the -no-remote switch.
In such a case you need to drag links in a Firefox window or paste the link in the location bar.

Since upgrading from Windows Vista to Windows 7 both Internet Explorer and Firefox will not recognize the numbers keys of my keyboard. I get numbers in Word and every other situation, just not in the internet programs.

Since upgrading from Windows Vista to Windows 7 both Internet Explorer and Firefox will not recognize the numbers keys of my keyboard. I get numbers in Word and every other situation, just not in the internet programs. I have tried uninstalling Firefox and reinstalling with no results.

If there are problems with importing the IE Favorites in Firefox then export the favorites in IE to an HTML file and import that file in the Firefox Bookmarks Manager.
If you do not have the menu bar in IE then right-click the toolbar at the top to enable the Menu Bar.
*Export the favorites in IE to an HTML file (bookmarks.html):<br>File > Import and Export
*Import the HTML file in Firefox:<br>Bookmarks > Show All Bookmarks > Import & Backup > Import Bookmarks from HTML
See "Import from another browser" and "Import from file":
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Import_bookmarks

Is there an ON LOAD difference between IE and Firefox?

I am experiencing a problem where a page does one thing in IE and something different in Firefox. Just wondering if anyone knows if this is normal behaviour or not.
I have an ApEx page which is building a dynamic AJAX hierarchy tree based on the example outlined in Carl Backstrom's MacDaddy Example apex.oracle.com site (http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=11933:49). As I click down the tree, each node is a hyperlink which takes me to a detail page about that node. I have an onload process on the Hierarchy Tree page which attempts to traverse down the tree to the node which I was "last at" when I was last on the page. This is so that when I am on the detail page of a node, I can click the "Back" button on the browser to navigate back to the Hierarchy Tree page and be presented with the "view" of the tree as when I left.
When I click the "Back" button to navigate back to the Hierarchy Tree page, the ONLOAD javascript code runs in IE, but not in Firefox. This has been verified by adding a simple "alert" function to the ONLOAD. The "alert" does not appear in Firefox when navigating back, but does in IE. By the way... when I initially navigate to the Hierarchy Tree page, the "alert" shows up in both IE and Firefox. It's the navigation BACK to the page where it doesn't show up in Firefox.
First of all, is this normal functionality? Meaning, when you use the Back button on the browser, is the ONLOAD code suppose to be run or does it only run when you navigate TO a page (not BACK TO a page)?
Secondly, is this normal functionality within ApEx? Is the ApEx environment doing anything in the background to screw up IE or Firefox from doing or not doing the ONLOAD code when navigating back to my Hierarchy Tree page?

Please stop posting with your off-topic link.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"seomax" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:g7es1a$hhi$[email protected]..
> wht is different between IE and firefox browser, and how
to implement css
> option(if related option exists) in firefox to see
appropriate
> output(which is
> not showing in firefox), wil not it mend ever? or is
there any solution
> for it?
> lots of people asked this question suggestion
appreciated.
>

Difference Between Explorer and Explorer Accelerated?

I was wondering if anyone could possibly give me links to documents that outline the differences between SAP Businessobjects Explorer and Businessobjects Explorer Accelerated. Or even just documents that outline their functionality without getting into techical specs too much.
I have found a few, but they all seem to be too general or specific. I understand enough to get that the Accelerated version has an add-on that allows you to connect to your BWA blades, but are there any other differences?
Thanks!

Did you already check this book 'Inside SAP BusinessObjects Explorer' by Ingo Hilgefort?
http://www.sap-press.com/products/Inside-SAP-BusinessObjects-Explorer.html
Xavier

Firefox 3.6.2 won't display the CSS correctly in VBulletin 4.1. Safari, Explorer and Firefox 4 beta work fine!

My upgraded site: http://www.thesabrehood.org/thehood/forum/ has CSS that displays fine with Safari and IE and the new Firefox Beta 4... but it won't display with the latest upgrade of FF3.6x. Obviously you fixed some code in V4 beta.. how about fixing 3.6x while you're at it!!!!

I also have this problem and it just started in the last week or so. It seems to be dependent on my home network and the problem only exists with firefox. I have used chrome and IE8 with no issues. I can verify tomorrow that it only exists in my network but one thing I was able to test is that the problem exists even on my linux boot. I am totally dumbfounded with this problem and I can't find anything that will allow the gmail page to load. All other pages I have tried load fine, all be it a little slower than normal but they load. If anyone knows of a difference between firefox and all other browsers on how it goes through the router I would appreciate the info cause I don't know of any differences.

My site previews fine in live, explorer and firefox, but the fonts are extra large and bold on chrome, this is my first site, please assist. I will be happy to provide screenshots and code or css sheets.

Working on my first site, Am getting different previews. Chrome tends to make the font big and bold while all other browsers work fine. Here is what the preview looks like in chrome followed by the firefox preview. I have my CSS and HTML code sheets below. Am also having a hard time centering the navigation links, they are a little closer to top of the navigation div than the bottom. Any assistance will be appreciated. Please feel free to point any other errors, am sure there is some in there.
@charset "utf-8";
body {
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
color: 151515;
font-family: "Gill Sans", "Gill Sans MT", "Myriad Pro", "DejaVu Sans Condensed", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
background-color: EFF5F8;
#banner {
#wrapper {
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,1.00);
width: 100%;
min-width: 740px;
max-width: 1024px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
#sidebar img {
max-width: 100%;
#wrapper #banner img {
max-width: 100%;
h1, h2 {
color: #3399CC;
font-family: source-sans-pro;
font-style: normal;
font-weight: 600;
h1 {
font-size: 40px;
text-align: center;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
#hero {
float: left;
width: 58%;
margin-left: 2%;
#sidebar {
width: 34%;
margin-left: 4%;
float: left;
#footer {
float: left;
clear: left;
padding-left: 2%;
background-color: #43A6CB;
color: #FFFFFF;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
a {
text-decoration: none;
font-weight: bold;
a:link {
color: #FF6600;
a:visited {
color: #FF6600;
a:hover, a:active, a:active {
color: #7F3300;
text-decoration: underline;
#navigation ul {
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
padding-top: 10pm;
padding-right: 5px;
padding-bottom: 10px;
padding-left: 5px;
text-align: center;
color: rgba(51,153,204,1.00);
#navigation {
background-color: #4D4D4D;
color: #FFFFFF;
text-transform: uppercase;
#navigation li {
display: inline;
padding-top: 15px;
padding-right: 15px;
padding-bottom: 15px;
padding-left: 15px;
margin-top: 10pm;
margin-right: 10pm;
margin-bottom: 10pm;
margin-left: 10pm;
clear: none;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
text-align: center;
color: rgba(194,209,221,1.00);
font-family: "Gill Sans", "Gill Sans MT", "Myriad Pro", "DejaVu Sans Condensed", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
Here is the code:
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>4gals Computer Service Home</title>
<link href="main.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<script>var __adobewebfontsappname__="dreamweaver"</script><script src="http://use.edgefonts.net/source-sans-pro:n2,n6:default.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="banner"><img src="Images/banners/4gals banner.jpg" alt=""/></div>
<div id="navigation">
    <ul>
      <li><a href="index.html" title="4gals Computer Services Main Page" target="_self">Main</a></li>
      <li><a href="contact.html" title="4gals Computer Services Contact Page" target="_self">Contact</a></li>
      <li><a href="appointments.html" title="4gals Computer Services, Service Request Form" target="_self">Service</a></li>
      <li><a href="helpful-tips.html" title="4gals Computer Services Helpful tips" target="_self">Tips</a></li>
      <li><a href="meet-the-gals.html" title="Meet Our Daughters; The 4gals" target="_self">4gals</a></li>
    </ul>
</div>
<div id="hero">
    <h1>Computer Service For Families and Small Businesses</h1>
    <p>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.</p>
    <h2> </h2>
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
    <h2>Call us for today for same-day service!</h2>
    <p><img src="Images/iphone-5_03.jpg" alt=""/></p>
    <p>The standard chunk of Lorem Ipsum used since the 1500s is reproduced below for those interested. Sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 from "de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum" by Cicero are also reproduced in their exact original form, accompanied by English versions from the 1914 translation by H. Rackham.</p>
</div>
<div id="footer">Copyright 2014 © Web design by a-loum</div>
</div>
</div>
<p> </p>
<h1> </h1>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body>
</html>

Starting with this, you have errors in your CSS code.
body {
margin-top: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
margin-bottom: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
color: 151515;
font-family: "Gill Sans", "Gill Sans MT", "Myriad Pro", "DejaVu Sans Condensed", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
background-color: EFF5F8;
body {
margin:0;
color: #151515;
font-family: "Gill Sans", "Gill Sans MT", "Myriad Pro", "DejaVu Sans Condensed", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;
background-color: #EFF5F8;
font-size: 100%;
Related links:
Windows Chrome, why do my fonts look so bad? - Lee Green
css3 - Bad font rendering Chrome - Stack Overflow
Nancy O.

Column Problems Between Explorer and Firefox

First, I apologize if this is something that has been posted.
The search function doesn't seem to be working, so I've been unable
to check for previous posts on-point.
I am having trouble with the columns in a table layout on a
site I am designing. It's located at
www.staggsmarketing.com/fleishell.html. The columns render properly
in firefox, but not at all so in Explorer. If you view the Explorer
version, the problem is quite obvious, so I won't explain further.
If anyone can take a look at the site and suggest what I've
done wrong, I would appreciate it. It was designed in CS3, and I've
run all the standard dreamweaver tests (from the results tab) to no
avail.
Thanks in advance!

> As to Walt's apparent suggestion that it's a total
mistake to rely on DW
> without extensive HTML/CSS knowledge, I hope nobody else
is scared away
> from DW
> after reading it.
Walt's suggestion was right on target. Using DW with no
knowledge of HTML
will always produce sub-optimal results.
> I've designed maybe 4 to 5 dozen sites with DW and only
a
> scintilla of coding knowledge compared to many of the
folks on these
> forums,
> and I really have only had to deal with three or four of
Walt's blind
> alleys
> (including this one).
You are in blind alleys you do not yet know about. This
philosophy is
short-changing you AND your paying customers.
> Web design is a hobby for me
And your output will always reflect this.
> I recommend it to anyone with an
> "HTML and CSS for Dummies" level of knowledge.
I don't. It will be a continual frustration for them,
especially if they
want to rise above the 'hobby' level.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"testaggs" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> Alan, thanks -- I took a look at the path you were
talking about, and it's
> a
> leftover from something before I put the site online. I
am able to remove
> it
> without issue. Still doesn't fix the column problem; I
may take Walt's
> advice
> and start over on the columns if I don't get any
more-helpful posts on the
> problem, but I'll wait a few days to see what others
might suggest. The
> few
> times I've run into real problems before in DW, it's
always been a simple
> fix
> that was just outside my skillset. I'm hoping someone
sees that here and
> says,
> "You idiot, it's the ???? tag."
>
> As to Walt's apparent suggestion that it's a total
mistake to rely on DW
> without extensive HTML/CSS knowledge, I hope nobody else
is scared away
> from DW
> after reading it. I've designed maybe 4 to 5 dozen sites
with DW and only
> a
> scintilla of coding knowledge compared to many of the
folks on these
> forums,
> and I really have only had to deal with three or four of
Walt's blind
> alleys
> (including this one). I agree it's a great tool for
those with good
> coding
> knowledge; but even with only an introductory level of
coding knowledge,
> I've
> found it to be a fantastic program. Would I be better if
I had that
> knowledge?
> Yes, loads. Would I be able to design anything with my
current coding
> skills
> but WITHOUT DW? Not even a one-line blank page (that's
an exaggeration,
> but
> you see the point). Web design is a hobby for me, and DW
has been a
> great
> vehicle to help me make it a useful one. I recommend it
to anyone with an
> "HTML and CSS for Dummies" level of knowledge.
>

Column Problems Between Explorer and Firefox - Repost

First, I apologize if this is something that has been posted.
The search function doesn't seem to be working, so I've been unable
to check for previous posts on-point.
I am having trouble with the columns in a table layout on a
site I am designing.
It's located at www.staggsmarketing.com/fleishell.html.
The columns render properly in firefox, but not at all so in
Explorer. If you view the Explorer version, the problem is quite
obvious, so I won't explain further.
If anyone can take a look at the site and suggest what I've
done wrong, I would appreciate it. It was designed in CS3, and I've
run all the standard dreamweaver tests (from the results tab) to no
avail.
Thanks in advance!

Sorry to say that I´ve looked at the code and I
can´t find the issue. I´m more of a solve by fiddling
type. But if you´re using CSS, why not just go for a table
layout to make sure you get it right? The page is not that complex
and it shouldn´t be much of an issue.
There´s several other issues with the page though, like
lack of title tag, and an image menu- For SEO purposes you should
really make a CSS menu with text links.

Web Gallery-Surprising Differences between Safari and Firefox

I discovered some surprising differences using Web Gallery in Safari vs. Firefox:
1. When you first view an album the gallery, the thumbnail photos take quite a bit longer to be visible in Safari than in Firefox.
2. When rolling the mouse over the Subscribe icon in Safari, a message states, "Add this album to iPhoto." In Firefox, the message states, "Subscribe to an RSS feed of this album."
3. When a movie is selected in Safari, you can download it immediately, though the movie is not playable from the Safari page until it fully loads. In Firefox, if you click the download icon before the movie has fully loaded, a message appears that states, "QuickTime is unable to play this movie. Please try again. Then, a window opens asking what to do with the file you are trying to download -- Save it, or Launch QuickTime. If you wait until the movie is fully loaded, it plays within the Firefox page. If, after it's loaded, you leave the page and then go back to that page, the movie won't load again and play within Firefox, but it can be downloaded.
I'm wondering whether these differences in functionality are typical or just occurring on my Mac, so please document your experience here.

Thanks Denes for your reply.
I use HttpWatch tool to measure the loading times. Reports are mostly the same for IE and FF. I can see from the report, there is three times shown error 404 Not Found for the items below.
http://......./images/sRegion-Body.png
http://......./images/sRegion-Bottom.png
http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png
The last action which caused 404 error started 2 seconds after the page was asked to refresh. The next action http://......../i/libraries/jquery-ui/1.8.22/ui/i18n/oracle/jquery.ui.datepicker-cs.js started after 38 seconds (hanging in the same place for 36 seconds). Does it mean that the problem is caused by http://......./images/sReportBG-Standard.png action which returns 404 error?
How can I add the missing images?
-Jiri

What is the difference between aurora and firefox browsers?

What is the difference between Firefox 9 and Aurora? Which one performs better?

The Aurora builds are for testing code for future Firefox version. The Nightly builds (currently Firefox 12) always get the latest changes and patches first and such changes bubble down to other Firefox versions with a delay of about six weeks, first to the Aurora channel (currently Firefox 11) and then another 6 weeks later to the Beta channel (currently Firefox 10) that then gets the next release (Beta goes to release at the end of January). Normal users should always stay on the release channel.
*http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Testing_pre-release_versions

I use firefox 3.6.1 on a mac os 10.5.8. What is the difference between this and firefox 6?

As I mentioned, I am running 3.6.1 and am when I go to the firefox website I get the message that I am using an old version and am asked to update to the latest which appears to be 6.0. Is this an update to 3.6.1? When researching on the web, I see that 6 is an update to version 5. So, is the update for me or is it a different version altogether?
Thanks

Yes, 6.0 is an update for 3.6.1. The 3.6.x versions were followed by 4.0 in March 2011, then 5.0 in June which was an update for 4.0, and 6.0 an update for 5.0 in August.
Mozilla moved Firefox to a fast release system this past spring, quicker releases with fewer changes per release. Instead of users having to wait for a new feature to be added in 10 to 14 months under the old release system, a new feature is added to a release like 12 weeks after the new feature is deemed to be complete and ready for release.

CSS differences in Explorer and firefox

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for