CST or VAT needs to be determined based on Ship-to-party

Dear All,
We have a specific requirement for one of our customer.
Customer wants the system to determine CST and VAT to be determined based on ship to party.
Say for Example, we have a condition table Country / Region / Region of Delivering plant / Tax class. Cust. / Tax Class. Mat.
In the sales Ship to party and Sold to party are different.
In this case, if the tax classification of the Sold to party 0 and tax classification of Ship to party is 1 means, system should determine CST or VAT according to According to ship to party.
In simple, CST or VAT should be determined based on Ship to party irrespective of the setting in Sold to party.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Mullairaja

Hello Mullairaja,
See Ship to Party is the partner who will receie the goods & applicability of VAT or CST will be decided by Ship to party Region.
As Sold to party & Ship to party can belong to different Regions (Different States in India) VAT or CST may be applicable as the case may be...
Thus this is a standard SAP funtion to determine VST / CST based on Region & Tax Classification Indicator of Ship-to-party.
Hope this helps..
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Similar Messages

Sales Employee based on Ship to party

Hi ,
We have a scenario where one sold to party is having multiple ship to parties... and each ship to party is catered by one sales employeee.
Can we get sales employee number determined in sales order based on ship to party if yes how.
please help.
regards,
Kiran.

In the partner determination procedure of the Ship to party - add the Sales Employee partner. So when ever ship to is created, the sales employee can be added to the ship to master.
In the Sales order Header Partner Determination, add the sales employee partner and in the Source column give SH - ship to . So the sales employee in the order is derived from the ship to.
Partner Determination T code VOPAN.
Hope this helps
Regards
Sai

Pricing Procedure Based on Ship to Party

Hi Guys,
During creation of sales order I want the pricing procedure to be picked up based on ship to party.
Ex: Sold -to -Party: Delhi ; Pricing procedure: 1
Ship-to-Party: Mumbai; Pricing procedure: 2
And if I run a sales order with SH -Mumbai, then the pricing procedure should be "2".
If the SH is Delhi then the pricing procedure should be "1"
Is this possible?
Regards
Ayyallas

Hi Ayyallas
When you create the sales order , the pricing procedure is picked up based on the sales area + Cupp + Dupp. . So it is not possible to pick the pricing procedure based on the ship to party when you create the sales order.
Regards
Srinath

Minimum Quantity in Sale Order based on Ship To Party city

Dear Experts
It is possine in Std SAP to get information or error message based on Minimum Quantity in Sale Order based on Ship To Party city??
Thanks
Krishna

No it is not possible. You have to go for sale order User exits in the program MV45AFZZ - USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Determine Partner from Ship to Party in Sales Order

Hi All,
I am in need of help. I have following requirement for Partner Determination.
1. In Ship to Party I have a Partner ZI
    I need system to get that ZI partner in my Sales Order.
I have setup the Origin Field to SH. But still it doesn't get it from it.
Thanks

I have good a partial solution. Here it is.
I have following customers:
Sold-to      Ship-to                      Additional Partners
Cust01       Cust01                      5001, 6001 (in Cust01)
Cust02       Cust02, Shp02.          2001, 3001 (in Cust02), 2201, 3301 (in Shp02)
Now When I creat a Sales order for.
Sold to = Cust02
Ship to = Cust02
Then System determine 2001, and 3001. (OK)
======================================================
Now when I creat a Sales order for
Sold to = Cust02
Ship to = Shp02
Then System determine 2201, and 3201. (OK)
======================================================
Now Suppose the following >>>>>>>>>>
IN SHIP TO PARTY Shp02 Partners 2201 and 3301 ARE NOT MAINTAINED.
Now when I creat a Sales order for
Sold to = Cust02
Ship to = Shp02
System determines 2001 and 3001. (which is in Sold to Party) THIS IS IN CORRECT.
System should not Determine anything.
=======================================================
How Can I Do this. I think User Exit is needed.

Select Contracts based on Ship-to Party

Hi all,
I have created two contracts of type ZCQ (VA41) with the following soldto and shipto party values.
Contract 1: soldto1, shipto1
Contract 2: soldto1, shipto2
<b>Now I need to retrieve contracts, based on a search criteria consisting of Sold-to party and Ship-to party. i.e If I enter soldto1 and shipto1 I need to get back Contract 1 and if I enter soldto1 and shipto2 i need to get back contract 2.</b>
Which is the field that I need to use to search for the Ship to value?
Right now I am selecting based on VBAK-KUNNR for Sold to party. But am not able to figure out where the Ship to party value will be stored during the contract creation. So now my query returns both the contracts, no matter what the value of Ship to search field is
Any pointers regarding this ( table, field, logic) would be really helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Reena

"See u are maintaining ship to party for the Contracts . so what table it is storing in "
This is exactly what Im trying to figure out.
I am creating contracts using VA41 for a particular value of soldto party and shipto party.
After I craete the contracts, I am trying to retrieve these contracts based on the soldto and ship to party values that I had entered. Now, I dont know where the ship-to party is getting stored.
I am not making any mapping for the ship to party. I am currently trying with just VBAK and VBAP, since I dont know if I should use any other table.
Data that I have in hand: Sold to Party, Ship to Party and Auart (ZCQ).
Example to make it more clear
Contract1: Soldto Party - 100042, Shipto Party - 100042
Contract2: Soldto Party- 100042, Shipto Party - 100055
Auart - ZCQ for both
Now in my input parameters, when I eneter 100042 for soldto party and 100042 for ship tp party, i get back contract1 and contract2. But I just want contract 1.
Similarly for the second scenario.
Hope I have not confused you. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Reena

Sold to party based on Ship to party or Bill to party

Hi Everybody,
Can we able to find the sold to party based on the ship to party or the bill to party?
Thanks,
Srinivasan.K

Hi,
When you give the sold to party number and the partner function you need to get whether it is SH or BP then the output will bring out all the assigned bill to's and ship to's.
But my requirement is the input should be the SH or BP and it should bring out the sold to party assigned to ship to or Bill to.
Thanks,
Srinivasan.K

Billing Due List based on Ship to Party

Hi,
            I have a scenario where in I have multiple ship to parties in a single sales order . So there are different deliveries for all the different ship to parties (i.e Delivery Split). But I need to process the Billing due List based on the Ship to party. The Bill to party and the Payer is same for all the ship to parties. Let me have an example.
           Let the Sold to party -
111
                        Bill to Party    -
111
                        Payer            -
111
                        Ship to Party 1 -- 222
                        Ship to Party 2 -- 333
                    Sales order --- 99999 has 10 line items, 5 each going to each ship to party. Now I am having Multiple deliveries .
                      del 1-> 44444 (Del NO)--> 222
                      del 1-> 44445 (Del NO)--> 222
                      del 1-> 44446 (Del NO)--> 222
                      del 1-> 44447 (Del NO)--> 333
                      del 1-> 44448 (Del NO)--> 333
                      del 1-> 44449 (Del NO)--> 333
Now I want a single invoice for del 44447,44448,44449 and one more Single invoice for del 44444,44445,44446.
             So I need to have a Billing due list based on the Ship to Party. Please provide me if any solutions and also let me know if I am missing anything in the Standard SAP to achieve this.
Thankyou,
Rakesh Tummala.

Hi
USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP will not work since it is the billing due index (VKDFS) that you want to add ship to ID as the sort criterion. The proper user exit are actually:
- USEREXIT_VKDFS_SORTKRI_SALES for order related billing
- USEREXIT_VKDFS_SORTKRI_DEL for delivery related billing
they are in include module V05IEXIT.
For delivery related billing it is a one line code as below
VKDFS-SORTKRI = LLIKP-KUNNR
Order related billing is a little more complicated because you can have ship at both header and item level. If you need this as well post a follow up
Once you have this done, then you can use the sort criterion field in VF04 to do ship to selection for you

Material Description in Sales Order based on Ship to Party Language

As we know that Material Description coming in Sales Order is based on the Language setup in Sold to Party. Is there any way I can get the Material description based on the Language setup in Ship to Party?
If not in Sales Order then anyway I can get the Material description based on the Language setup in Ship to Party in "Delivery" or do I have to use the user exit to do so?

Hey,
Why u r bother about translation of language description in sales order from ship to party n all.
c u can even take language description from sold to party, as u wanted from Ship to party. for this u just have to maintain language in alternate data tab in CMR.
Thanks
Mk

How to raise all invoices based on Ship-To-Party

Hi SD Guru's,
Could you please tell me how to raise invoices on Ship-To-Party?
I know in standard all invoices will be raised against Sold-To-Party.
I know i can manually go in the sales order and change the Bill -To-Party to same as Ship-To-Party.
But is there some standard setting so that all my invoices are raised again Ship-To-Party without any manual intervention.
Regards
Ravi

hello, Ravi.
the most logical thing to do is to make your ship-to party also as the bill-to or the payer. because if the bill-to isn't the one being billed and the payer isnt the one paying, why maintain them in the first place?
however, you can define output condition types that when the billing document is created and saved, the ship-to is sent a copy of the invoice.
regards.

Delivery Block set/reset based on Ship-to-party

Hi Experts,
         I am having a requirement to set/reset a delivery block in schedules lines of a particular line item when there is a change in ship-to-party in a sales order (VA02).
         If the ship-to-party is in 'US' then there is no delivery block in Schedule lines,or if it is some other country then the delivery block has to be set in schedule lines.
        I have checked the form routines in the userexit MV45AFZZ but I am not able to set/reset the delivery block for a particular line item in schedule lines, when there is a change in Ship-to-party.
       Please provide your valuable suggestions/solution to satisfy this requirement.
       Thanks in Advance.
Regards
K Arasu

What exactly do you mean by "not able"? USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBEP should work or, in the worst case, USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE.

Export Tax(Vat) based on Bill to party

Hi
I have a very peculiar sutuation, in normal scenario tax and prices are determined based on Ship-To-Party country and plant, however, client expect Export Tax to be calculated based Bill to party country. Need suggesttion, how to address this query.
Could you please suggest. Points will be rewarded to helpful answers.
Regards
Kalpesh

Hi Kalpesh
I think you need to change your access sequence of MWST.
Via transaction code V/07.
You need to change the destination country (which is ship to country) into sold to party via field catalog. But we do not advise this to clients, because you are then changing the standard SAP logic.
If the client really insists, then you need to make a new pricing procedure like MWST ie ZMWST with the necessary changes/settings but of course this a lot work again.
Hope this helps, I would appreciate if you could reward if helpful
kr
hakan

Support team determination based on message creators - how to

Hello, dear experts,
I try to implement the following scenario:
We have several user groups with numerous users (they create messages).
Support team needs to be determined based on the user group. How can we implement this?
Standart decision with rule AC13200137 seems not applicable in that case. I try to do it with org. structure: create org. unit corresponding to user groups, assign business partners/users to them but I don't know what access sequence can I use for this (in Partner Determination). Could you give a piece of advice about this scenario?
Any help is really appreciated.

Hi Remy
I have configured service desk message and determination of message support procesors
Users can change status of service desk message trough B_USERSTAT Authorization object if the Actions are available regarding the ticket status
I like to set conditions, sou2026 if service message are assigned to BASIS TEAM only this group must change service message status or edit service message data
Thereu2019s any way to do this trough authorization objects?? B_USERST_T maybe ? combination of B_USERSTAT & B_USERST_T (activation) ?? Status profiles & Authorization key & transactions types, actions profiles??
Best regards

VAT / CST if Ship-to-Party is different

Dear All,
Issue is regarding the Tax calculated for the respective Partner.
Sold-to-Party & Bill-to-party is in Karnataka (VAT applicable).
Ship-to-Party is in other state say Tamil Nadu or Andra Pradesh (CST Applicable).
Logistics has to say that CST will be applicable, whereas Finance dept. has to say VAT is applicable.
May I know Tax calculation will be for CST or VAT?
Inputs and if any authenticated document supporting for the same will be of great help.
Awaiting for the response.
Thanks n regards,
Vijayashree

A similar argument was going long time back and I got this document from a tax consultant.
Meaning of u2018Inter State Sale
Section 3 of CST Act defines Inter-State sale or purchase as follows : A sale or purchase of goods shall be deemed to take place in the course of inter-State trade or commerce if the sale or purchase (a) occasions the movement of goods from one State to another or (b) is effected by a transfer of documents of title to the goods during their movement from one State to another. Thus, inter-state sale can be as per section 3(a) or section 3(b).
It has been held that these two modes are mutually exclusive. u2013 Tata Iron and Steel Co. (TISCO) v. S R Sarkar - (1960) 11 STC 655 (SC) = AIR 1961 SC 65 = (1961) 1 SCR 379 - confirmed in UOI v. K G Khosla & Co. Ltd. - (1979) 43 STC 457 (SC) = (1979) 2 SCC 242 = AIR 1979 SC 1160 = (1979) 3 SCR 453, i.e. when a sale falls under section 3(a) it cannot fall under section 3(b) and CST can be levied only once. In Bharat Heavy Electricals v. UOI - AIR 1996 SC 1854 = (1996) 102 STC 373 (SC) = (1996) 4 SCC 230 = JT 1996(4) SC 427, it was held that whether a particular sale is inter-state or not has to be decided only with reference to section 3 of CST Act alone and no other section. Similarly, to decide question in which State the tax is leviable, only section 9(1) is relevant - no other provision is relevant.
Sale which u2018Occasions movement of goodsu2019 - As per section 3(a), u2018Inter State saleu2019 takes place if the sale occasions movement of goods from one State to another. In CST v. Suresh Chand Jain - (1988) 70 STC 45 (SC), it was held that a sale can be said to be in the course of inter-state only if two conditions concur viz. sale of goods and (ii) a transport of those goods from one State to another.
There are following essential ingredients of inter-State sale under this sub-section:
Transaction must be a completed sale.
+Location of buyer and seller is immaterial. Thus, even if buyer and seller are within the same State, sale will be inter-state, if sale occasions movement of goods from one State to another. e.g. the buyer may have construction site in another State and may ask seller to despatch goods directly to the site. Inter State sale by transfer of documents is also possible even when buyer and seller are in same State.+
There should be an agreement to sale which contains a stipulation (express or implied) regarding movement of goods from one State to another. - Balabhgas Hulaschand v. State of Orissa (1976) 37 STC 207 (SC) = AIR 1976 SC 1016 = (1976) 2 SCC 44 = 1976 2 SCR 939.
It is immaterial whether a completed sale precedes the movement of goods or follows the movement of goods or takes place while the goods are in transit. What is important is that movement of goods and the sale must be inseparably connected - CST, UP v. Bakhtawar Lal Kailash Chand Arhti - (1992) 87 STC 196 = 1992 AIR SCW 2246 = AIR 1992 SC 1952 = JT 1992 (4) SC 388 (SC 3 member bench) [In Balabhgas Hulaschand v. State of Orissa (1976) 37 STC 207 (SC) = AIR 1976 SC 1016 = (1976) 2 SCC 44 = 1976 2 SCR 939, it was held that concluded sale should take place in a State which is different from the State from which goods move. However, now the later judgment (i.e. 1992 judgment) prevails].
From the above, you can conclude that tax should ONLY based on Ship To Party.
Hope this should be helpful to you.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Route Determinaiton based on shipping instructions.

Hi Experts,
I wanted to determine the route based on shipping instruction. How I can bring the shipping instruction field in route determination instead of shipping condition.
Our current process is, route determination based on shipping condition but some times the routes will be different based on shipping instructions.

Hi Jacob,
Thank you for your response.
Initially I have suggested the same solution but users are not ready to accept. The issues is, we have 100 to 1000 lines in purchase order and based on customer requirement the routes need to changed.
If I use the shipping condition user need to change the lines manually one by one (Because the fast change is not possible for shipping tab fields) but if I use the shipping instruction then it is easy to change through fast change mode.
As per the SAP note 356628 it is difficult to add the new fields(shipping tab fields) in fast change.

CST or VAT needs to be determined based on Ship-to-party

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for