CTM PDS for CDP

Hi,
We are using CTM for Characteristic dependent planning (CDP), for that we are CIFing PDS from ECC
In CDP since CTM supports only time continuous planning we have to use PP/Ds PDS and since CTM supports only CTM PDS we have done the BADi enhancement and getting the CTM PDS in APO.
The issue is that when we CIF the PDS with Object dependency the OD is not reflecting in the CTMPDS in APO while we are able to see the OD in PP/DS for the same production version.
has anyone worked on CTM PDS with Object Dependency and what can be the probable reason for this discreapancy.
I have also applied not 0001342840 to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Sanjog

Hi,
there are some restrictions with CDP in CTM according to note 1284461:
Characteristics based planning with CTM
PDS must come from an ERP system. The supply chain should not mix VC and
CDP scenarios. For reference characteristics only components
/SAPAPO/CULL_CFG_COMPONENT-QUANT and
/SAPAPO/CULL_CFG_MODE_PROCEDURE-DURVAR are supported.
Variant functions are not supported. Only the following Object Variables
are supported: $SELF, $PARENT, $ROOT. For Selection Conditions and
Procedures the following operators are supported: =, <>,AND,OR,NOT
For Procedures the following operator is supported: IF. Complex select
conditions are not supported.
Multi-value characteristics are not supported.
Can you check if you fullfill the above mentioned criteria?
Regards Frank

Similar Messages

What is better to use for CTM: PDS or PPM?

what is better to use for CTM: PDS or PPM?
what is easier to manage and use in CTM : PDS or PPM? and why?thanks
elena

Hi ,
In CTM I will recommend PDS over PPM.
You can directly CIF PDS as SNP PDS from ECC, you do not have to convert from PPDS to SNP unilke PPM.
PDS supports VC, Phantom assemblies.
PDS can be maintained in ECC and change transfer is easy.
Validity period of components can be specified in the PDS , Which is not possible in PPM.
SAP is developing PDS for future use compared to PPM.
Regards,
Pavan Verma

Operations with object dependency not showing in CTM PDS

Hi all,
When PDS is created in APO, the operations with object dependency are excluded in CTM PDS but in PPDS PDS all the operations are fetched.
When I remove OD from operations and then CIF (curto_create), the operations are visible in CTM PDS too.
Please let me know the possible reasons for operations with OD getting excluded from CTM PDS
Regards,
RS

Hello RS,
If you are using SCM 7.0 please implement the following instructions in BADI /SAPAPO/CURTO_CREATE, for the method CREATE_CTM_PDS insert the code ev_true = 'x' and Activate it.
then execute the curto_create transaction, while executing curto_create don't select change transfer. Object dependencies should be visible.
PS: I assume there is no error in the object dependencies defined and the status of the object dependency is set to released.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks and Regards,
Roopesh

CTM PDS with Overlapping operations

Hello APO Guru's,
Has anybody come across on creation of CTM PDS with overlapping operations?
We have a requirement where we have 5 operations/phases in our Master Recipe and have defined a Start-Start relationship between operations, with an offset.
We have activated an BADi /SAPAPO/CURTO_CREATE, to create a CTM PDS while CIFing PPDS PDS. CTM PDS gets created but without any activities.
Could anyone provide any insights on how to handle this situation?
With Regards,
Mangesh

Hi Mangesh,
Where you able to find solution to your problem. Following is the issue that I am facing
We are having two operations 010 and 020 in a routing and we want to schedule both the operations at the same time and not in sequence. I believe that we can use the "required overlap functionality" in the routings for the parallel scheduling of the two operations.
After setting the overlap functionality when I trying to run SAP_PP_002 the operations in the PPDS order are being scheduled in sequence. In addition, the PPDS PDS also shows an End- start in the activity relationship (I don't know if this makes any difference)
Could one of the experts please let me know what are the settings in PPDS that you used to run the two sequential operations in parallel in APO?
Thanks in advance

PDS for SNP in inactive version

Hi all!
Does anybody knows how can I transfer a PDS for SNP in an inactive version?
Thanks in advance!

Rafael,
PDS is always created in APO in active model (000) only. You cannot maintain/change PDS in APO. Once transferred, PDS should be available for all existing versions in 000 model. Try using it in any version while executing your planning run and I'm sure the PDS will be selected as a source of supply in any of the valid versions.
If you still have any issues, then /SAPAPO/VERSION_COPY_TRANS should help you to copy the PDS from 000 to any other versions.
regards,
Srinidhi

CTM planning for process industry

Hi,
We are taking CTM planning run in a process industry scenario where we are having continuous processing. But when we do CTM planning CTM creates PP/DS planned order to meet the delivery date of orders and for some orders their are unscheduled gaps between operation due to non availability of next resource.
Is it possible to create orders in CTM without any unscheduled gaps between the operations as is the case in case of orders created using PP/DS?
Regards,
Sanjog Mishrikotkar

Hi kiran Ghule,
With the functions of the Quality Management (QM) module, you can implement it.
The QM application component supports tasks associated with quality planning, quality inspection and quality control. In addition, it controls the creation of quality certificates you can do this
Explore your self in this module if any problem then come back.
Regards
R.Brahmankar

WAP4410N support for CDP or LLDP

Hi,
Does anybody know if the WAP4410N access point for Small Businesses support any Discovery Protocol like Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP) or Link-Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP), both for sending and receiving frames? I did an extensive search on the manuals and I was unable to find it
Appreciate your help

Hi,
SB APs do not support discovery protocols like CDP.
You also better move your thread to small-business -> wireless forums. They will be able to assist you better.
HTH
Amjad
You want to say "Thank you"?
Don't. Just rate the useful answers,
that is more useful than "Thank you".

CIF PDS for SNP and PPDS

Dear Experts,
I am using SNP and PPDS
do i need to have sales bom for SNP PDS is it mandatory ,
or just normal production bom is enough for having both snp and ppds Product data structure
Thanks & Regards
Raj

Dear Satya,
Thanks for your reply
I know PV is needed for SNP PDS , is the PV which is used for SNP PDS is same for PDS PP/DS, or we need to use and special key during CIF ing to APO from ECC 6
Regards
Raj

Using PPDS PDS with CTM

Hi
I am trying to use CTM with PPDS PDS. When I create the master data structure it is not able to pickup the succesive source of supply.
i.e. Suppose Product A (in-house production) has a component B (externally procured), the T-lane for B is existing from plant to the vendor. The PDS for A is now added to the MDS, when we now try to generate the MDS, it does not pick up the downstream source of supplies and gives the error "Could not find source of supply for B".
The BADi for using PPDS PDS with CTM has been implemented already but the problem still exists.
If I use PPDS PPM i do not get this problem.
Kindly help.
Regards
Manoj

Hi Keiji
I saw this message sometime back on this thread then I dont know what happened to it
Subject: Re: Using PPDS PDS with CTM
Message: Hi Manoj
Following comment means, you already implement BADI /SAPAPO/CURTO_CREATE Method CREATE_CTM_PDS ?
>The BADi for using PPDS PDS with CTM has been implemented already but the problem still exists.
From your comment, you try to use normal PPDS PDS. But since CTM require CTM PDS for PPDS, if you do not have CTM PDS, please create CTM PDS by using above BADI during CIF transfer of your PDS.
If above comment does not apply, do you see any error message in CTM master data check ?
best regards
Keiji
The CTM PDS have been created, thats what i meant by that BADi implementation. The problem is still existing. The CTM master data check says that the source of supply cannot be found. I replicated the same model with PPM and it worked.
Thanks
Manoj
Edited by: Manoj Narain on Jan 5, 2009 3:33 PM

I/O CDP relevant input components in PDS with wrong quantity

Dear Experts,
In my PDS, I have 2 components which are I/O type CDP relevant input. Problem is that in the PDS, these CDP component quantities are wrong in comparison with quantities maintained in the R/3 BoM Master Recipe.
Components are classified with a class type 023 in R/3 - batch specific unit of measure, and product master is classified with a class type 400 (CDP classification) in APO. Configuration schema is CDP in APO and as mentioned, I am using PDS instead of PPMs. Note that finish product, father, is not using any CDP class, it is only some of the components.
So problem is basically that the quantities are not right, it looks like it is not doing right the conversion of units of measure however for the non CDP components, it is doing it OK.
Component BoM quantity is 46 Kg and PDS component quantity is 46 BRL. Note that base unit of measure is BRL.
But If I check material master units of measure, I see that 1 BRL(Barrel) --> 1 BRL and then 75Kg --> I BRL (Barrel). Same for in the Product Master units of measure tab.
Am I missing something?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Carlos

Hi,
Any clue of why components quantities are not being transferred right.
Thanks a lot for your feedback
Regards
Carlos

CDP Charactesristics Propagation using PDS

Hi Gurus,
My customer uses product variant and super recipe in ECC. I'm in the implementation phase and the customer wants to use CDP instead of VC.
In APO he is going to use Block Planning, super recipe and PDS. We have a classes type 400 and some characteristics to support block planning, super recipe and PP/DS scheduling rules. Some characteristics are the same for different levels (FERT and HALB) but the value are different.
Since we are using PDS all the characteristics will be considered in the propagation (pegging with characteristics), and the pegging will not be done because for the same characteristics the values are different between FERT and HALB.
How can we use this scenario but not use the pegging with characteristics? Is that possible?
Thanks for the attention
Thiago Cyrillo

Hi,
As mentioned by you the following will be suitable to solve your problem:
1. Integration of Classes and characteristics:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/b3/12813b680c250fe10000000a114084/content.htm
2. Planning with characteristics
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/b1/947337e68ae526e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
3. Dynamic Pagging(But you told not to use it) http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/de/d70f3a57b38c0fe10000000a11402f/content.htm
To influence which classes are to be created in SAP APO for CDP, you can use the BAdI Control Class Assignments for CDP with the method CDP_CLASSES_FILTER in Customizing under Advanced Planning and Optimization --> Master Data --> Classification and Configuration --> Business Add-Ins (BAdIs) for Classification and Configuration.
Regards,
Santosh Kumar Mishra

CTM and PDS Structures

Hello everyone,
We are going to use the following BAdI's to create PDS
/SAPAPO/CURTO_CREATE
and for CTM
CREATE_CTM_PDS
Questions:-
If we create the PDS for CTM does this still create them for PP/DS? so would the table entries be double? (one for the PP/DS PDS and one for the CTM PDS).
And cane we make the naming of the CTM PDS different to the PP/DS PDS (so insert CTM in front of all the CTM PDS).
Thanks in advance.
Guy

Guy:
When you generate integration model for PDS you choose Rough cut planning and PDS type SNP for CTM, where as PDS for PP/DS goes by its own type with Detailed planning option and when you CIF it over to APO you can see the PDS to check the difference between CTM PDS or PP/DS PDS by there type.
I hope this help.
Mono

CIF Blocking for SNP CTM Run

Hi Folks,
We are implementing CTM solution for a HTDM client. It is the same APO instance where one company is already live on APO and CTM runs are taken on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday on a weekly basis. Now for this new company implementation, we need CTM run to happen everyday at end of the day. Since the client is in USA, we can't have CTM run till 9PM EST since there are end users in west coast as well. But due to busness requirements, we need to complete the CTM runs and publish orders by 8PM EST. No comromise possible on this
Here is the critical issue. CTM run requires CIF Qs to be blocked during the run time. When we run CTM for company 2, if the CIF Qs are blocked, company 1 will face issues since their business is on else where. Is there a way to run CTM and block CIF Qs only for company 2? It is possible for data transfer block from APO to ECC but what we are concerned is to block ECC to APO data for company 2 only. If this can be achieved, the issue of conflict with CTM runs gets resolved.
Has anyone faced this issue or is aware of a solution to this problem? Kindly reply back.
Thanks,
Chandra

Hi Chandra
Does the customer use same client for both company ?
If yes, is there any relation between the data of company 1 and company 2 ?
(Same location products are used ?)
If the data is related, it is better to lock CIF queue.
(Since incoming data can have influence on running CTM
as described in Note 487261 / 528913).
But if the data is not related (different location products are processed,
I think you do not need to block CIF queue from ECC to APO).
best regards
Keiji

Phantom Assemblies with component for PDS - SNP.

Hello,
Does anyone have planned a components under phantom assembly? How can we explode the BOM in PDS-SNP.
Is it possible to used PDS for Phantom Assemblies, what have to check and modify?
Thanks in advance.
Dgee

Dear Dgee,
please read followings on sap help about phantom assemly and PDS: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/40/57454070eb2571e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/92/b84d40eae76f13e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/dc/28c13dd9279710e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/4d/01be3d1abbe913e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/71/513b407b686913e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Tibor

Can we use SNP PDS in Multi level ATP ?

Hi All,
We do CTM planning with existing SNP PDS In APO and now we want to explore to use the Multi level ATP functionality for GATP. I know, MATP can create the ATP trees if the stock is not available and these can be converted into PPDS order.
My question is, can we use SNP PDS for this purpose?
Thanks,
Abhilasha

Hi Abhilasha,
There is no such specific mention anywhere in the literature that you cannot use SNP PDS for MATP. The only downside to using SNP PDS is that SNP PDS are meant for mid to long term planning and the activities/operations in SNP PDS are usually not in detail i.e only important activities or bottle neck components are usually used which will not always facilitate detailed scheduling.
On the other hand MATP creates ATP tree structures by plan exlosion(which can be SNP/PDS) and saves the requirements groups(component requirements of header level) with dates/qts and source of supply. It uses PPDS component to convert these ATP tree structures into PPDS planned orders depending on the conversion horizon/requirements dates. It does that by reading the source of supply, requirements dates and quantities from ATP tree structure and by plan explosion.
When MATP planned orders are created you should no longer plan them with automatic planning run as that will cause re-explosion of the plan and might cause incorrect down stream requirements if you had had substitutions at component leve during MATP check. In planned orders, you have an option of changing the allowed sources of supply (in source of supply section). But for orders created by MATP, you will not be allowed to change the source of supply field from SNP PDS to PPDS PDS in the planned order because it will re-explode the plan. So you can decide for yourself if you can use SNP PDS as source of supply for PPDS planned orders.
Hope that answers your question.
Regards,
Mohan

CTM PDS for CDP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for