CTS Project in System Landscape

Hi,
for chaRM,i want to clarrify about CTS project creation.
1. Whether CTS & IMG Project Should Exist in all satellite system ?
2. How to create a IMG & CTS Project.? In tx Solar_project_admin we can able to create the IMG project for all roles (DEV,QT,PRD)in the Satellite system .
or else should we create the IMG project in only developement and rest of the satellite system can be transport the request ???

In Solar_Project_Admin you can create an IMG Project on the development system for the Maintenance Project. You can assign an existing project, but the Create button under the IMG Projects tab will create on for you.
I believe the CTS project will be automatically created when you activate the Maintenance Cycle for the Maintenance Project.
You can use the /TMWFLOW/PROJ transaction under the Project Structure tab to see the IMG and CTS Projects for you Maintenance Project.

Similar Messages

Defining System Landscape in Implementation Project

Hi
I want to ask about defining System Landscape of an implementation project in solution manager.
I have assigned the logical Component in Systems tab.
I want to ask about creating the IMG Project in Sstems Landscape tab,, Is it compulsory to create IMG project for the new Implementation Project??? Why we create IMG Project?? Is it compulsory??
Please guide
Regards
Sidra Hasan

Hi,
Implementation Project u2013 A project to implement SAP solution as a part of regular implementation or a roll out. This is considered for single-site implementations. Predefined scenarios can be selected from template projects.
It is not compulsory to create these projects in solution manager that depends upon your implementation strategy.
Thanks
Sunny

ChaRM - possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project?

Hi,
can anyone tell me if it is possible to have 2 different system landscapes in one project. One landscape for developing and testing the Change Requests and another one for developing and testing the Bugfixes.
Thanks,
Martin

As Rick, mentions, there's no default way.
Having said that, there's nothing stopping you from doing it yourself. You can add a kind of language selector to the layout and set that for every html5 output. With some JavaScript, you can have the user switch between your outputs. It would look like content categories, but you'll have build it yourself.

Help regding... Checking system landscape during the Project Preparation

Hello All,
While I was creating a project using SolMan, I came across the "System Landscape --> Systems" tab, where I found an option to check the system landscape by clicking on the "System Landscape" button.
By clicking on that button I was able to check whether a valid logical component is assigned to various systems like ECC, CRM, KW, etc. Initially I just had an ECC system alone in the system landscape. Hence was able to see a logical component being assigned under the ECC system.
But after some time, when I checked the system landscape using the same "System Landscape" button in the "System Landscape-->Systems" tab, I was not able to find the logical component that has been assigned to the ECC System.
But the RFC is still enabled and I was able to navigate to the ECC system from SolMan.
Am I missing something? What is this "System Landscape" button for? Please provide me some insight into this issue.
Thanks a lot in advance.
best rgds,
Alagammai.

Hi,
The error "CASLExec" is an error reported by HP support assistant software, uninstall the HP support assistant by clicking on start search --> programs and features--> Uninstall progrmam, Update the latest version of HP support by clicking on the link
http://h71036.www7.hp.com/hho/us/en/pclc/articles/hp-support-assistant.html?lang=en&cc=us
Please try the steps mentioned in the below link for Windows 7 Service Pack 1installation error code issue.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/troubleshoot-problems-installing-service-pack
Thank You.

Project landscape and system landscape

hi all
what is thifference between system landscape and project landscape??
anil

Hi Anil,
System landscape:
They system landscape basically is the set-up or arrangement of your SAP servers. Ideally, in an SAP environment, a three-system landscape exists. A three-system landscape consists of the Development Server-DEV, Quality Assurance Server-QAS and the Production Server-PROD. This kind of set-up is not primarily designed to serve as server clusters in case of system failure, the objective to enhance "configuration pipeline management".
A Typical SAP Three-System Landscape.
At this juncture, it is important to state that a test system - Sandbox can also exit separately. The essence of the sandbox is to test the configuration of the business processes of a company, especially at the inception of the project (before the Business Blue Print is signed). It can also serve as a practice environment, even after go-live.
Pipeline is the environment where the configuration in the development system is moved to the quality assurance system and finally to the production system. The whole idea is to ensure that the configuration of these systems is in sync at any point in time. Suffice to say that, configuration/changes are first made in the Development system, thoroughly tested in the Quality Assurance system before been loaded into the production (Live) system.
This approach throws up the transport management system concept. Transport management system is the coordination of the movement of objects and configuration changes from the development system to the Quality Assurance system and then to the Production system. At times, this sequence of movement is not possible, especially in cases where an SAP note mandates that changes be made directly on the production system.
In such rare cases, objectively confirm that the change transport cannot be performed. Very likely, your system must have been configured to "not modifiable" (a system locking strategy that enforces the three-system landscape change transport rule); unlock the system by changing the global setting option to "modifiable" using transaction SE03. After you have done that, effect the change(s) on the system. Immediately lock the system back by changing the global setting option to "not modifiable" using transaction SE03. Replicate the changes on the other system. Note that transaction SCC4 can also be used to lock the system so that client dependent and independent configuration changes are not carried out directly on the production system.
By and large, the SAP system landscape ensures that the integrity of data is enhanced via enforcing a controlled configuration changes effect on the target system - production.
Project landscape:
It's about the kind of soultion customer would be implementation in his project. Like CRM, SCM, ERP.
Reward points if it helpful.
Thanks & Regards
Sasikanth.Ch

ChaRM - Mainenance Cycle in two system landscape - possible?

Hi Experts,
we are trying to create a maintenace cycle with two systems.
We have a system defined as "Evaluation System" and the second is defined as "Production System".
Generally Question
Is it possible to create a maintenace cycle for a two-system-scenario?
Specific Question - Erorrs/Warnings
While checking the project we got several errors/problems:
1 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_CHARM_BASICFUNC_001 and database
2 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_SDESK_BASICFUNC_000 and database
3 No consolidation system found for EID-800 (project Z_CRM_T)
4 No track for project Z_CRM_T with log. system EID/800
5 Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for CBI-001
CTS
The transport system is configured correct - Check in STMS is OK
Question:
The comparison checks seem to be OK - is it necessary to reactivate the BC Sets?
Kind regards
Tom

Hi,
the system role for your client/systems in the logical component is very important:
- The development system needs to be defined as a Source System.
- If you don't have a QA, leave all target systems empty. If there are one or more consolidation/integration/regression systems, assign them to system role Target System.
- Your production system uses system role Production System.
The defined Development client needs a client dependent (TMS parameter CTC=1) consolidation track to the QA, or in a 2 Tier landscape to the production system. In a 3 Tier landscape you need a delivery track from QAS client to your production client. But as you wrote, TMS has been set up already. I just would like to mention all steps....
Check that all RFC connections have been set up correctly. Especially the Trusted RFC. Don't forget the Trusted RFC to client 000 ot the TMs domain controller.
In tab Systems ( transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape ):
Make sure you see all clients of your logical component. If not hit button System Role Assignment and add your System role.
Then still in the same tab: Hit button Shipment Routes and make sure, you see the complete transport track and only this track here!
After correct setup of TMS, RFCs, logical components and assignment of LC to your project:
First perform a Refresh and a Check in transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape => Change Requests. Then please recreate the maintenance cycle (and task list).
Regards,
Holger

URGENT: Changing System Landscape in ChaRM

Ok...here is our situation:
We use ChaRM with a 3 tier system landscape (DEV > USER > PROD).
Out USER system has been down for a month (maintenance) so we went live with ChaRM as follows:
DEV > PREPROD >PROD
Our USER system is now back up and running so we have replaced the Logical Component on the project to reflect this. This has worked ok but the task list is still showing the old system landscape. i.e. its showing PREPROD still instead of USER. How do I resolve this?
Do I have to complete the existing cycle and then create a new one? This would be fine except I would lose all the jobs I have scheduled in the task list (schedule every 15min EVERY day....took me ages).
Any suggestions?
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi,
About this issue, there is a detail information about this in blog point 6 u201CChanges in the logical components of a project where Charm is already activatedu201D.
This is the link: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15116
So, you have to change the transport route accordingly and then close current maintenance cycle and generate a new one.
Following is the steps.
1: please import all the transport requests which were associated in the current maintenance cycle task list by STMS manually import.
1: change transport route from DEV > PREPROD >PROD to DEV > USER > PROD on the domain controller system.
2: close current maintenance cycle.
3: change the system landscape to DEV > USER > PROD in solar_project_admin.
4: generate a new maintenance cycle.
Thanks
Regards,
Vikram

Is it possible to do portal content transports through System landscape?

Hello,
In order to transport content from portal A to portal B I am currently using transport packages: export the content from portal A, download it to the local PC and import it to portal B. The process is working OK but I still have a question:
SAP are transferring all the control on their systems to the System landscape, for example Java developments. My question is if it is also possible to make these transports through the system landscape so no local PCs are involved in the process?

Hi Roy,
You are right in the point that development projects can be transported, using the NWDI, centrally managed through the system landscape.
Nevertheless, the PCD transports (EPA) have to be touched manually anyhow. Theoretically, you can set up an SDA and put an EPA into it, see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a3/782240da03e569e10000000a155106/frameset.htm for details.
But this only really makes sense if you want to transport your own application together with the portal configuration (iViews representing your application...).
So in the end, PCD transports are designated to be transported as you are used to - manually via the export / import function of the portal.
Hope it helps
Detlev

Setting Up the System Landscape for ESS

Hello Experts,
I am implementing ESS in portal.
I am in step of defining systems in portal for ESS/MSS.
Below is link I am following from help.sap.com
[Link|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/5b/76a6d7fd3a4e91bfb422405bf3e04d/frameset.htm]
In above link it is mentioned that we have to define following systems :
SAP_WebDynpro_XSS
SAP_ECC_HumanResources
SAP_ECC_Travel
SAP_ITS_XSS
SAP_BSP_EREC
Additionaly according to below Article in SDN :
[Link|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/21eb036a-0a01-0010-25a3-b2224432640a?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Following additional systems must be created :
SAP_ITS_EBU Looks similar to SAP_ITS_XSS above
SAP_R3_Financials
Now the basis person in my project has handed over to me following systems :
SAP_BSP_EREC
SAP_ITS_FND Name mismatch as FND is used in place of XSS or EBU
SAP_R3_Financials
SAP_WebDynpro_ESS Name mismatch as ESS is used in place of XSS
Now below two systems are altogether missing as per first link on help.sap.com
SAP_ECC_HumanResources
SAP_ECC_Travel
Please explain if it requires to be corrected or name mismatch and missing ststems would do.
Thanking you in anticipation.

All the above names that you are referring to are not necessarily separate systems.
These are system aliases for a system object created in your portal via System Administration - System landscape.
So, if you have HR and Finance on the same backend server, then you need only one system with the related system aliases.
You will need SAP_BSP_EREC only if you are planning on using E-recruitment.
Similarly, you will need SAP_ITS_XSS only if you are planning on using any ITS applications.
It is pretty straight forward to change/correct the names of your system aliases instead of changing the usage of these aliases every where else.
SAP_ECC_HumanResources is absolutely necessary.
SAP_ECC_Travel is required if you are planning on using travel and expense related applications.
Also, note that SAP_WebDynpro_XSS should be the alias of the system where your webdynpro applications are deployed (typically the same portal server)
- Shanti

Could not get system landscape directory client - NWDS 7.31 SP 09

Hi Experts,
We are unable to import development configurations from NWDI 7.4 to NWDS 7.31 for one of the developer's id. Other developers are able to import the
configuration successfully in NWDS and are able to create projects without any issues. In fact, I am able to import the development configurations from his Id on my machine.
The error message that is appearing is as follows: Could not get system landscape directory client.
PFB the NWDS logs:
null
Error
Tue Jan 06 12:48:58 IST 2015
List Development Configurations failed [Error: com.sap.ide.dii05.ui.internal.sld.SldContext Thread[ModalContext,6,main]]
com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.LcrException: com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.CIMClientException: HTTP response code: 407 (Proxy Authentication Required ( Forefront TMG requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy filter is denied. ))
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.HttpRequestSender.newClientException(HttpRequestSender.java:719)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.HttpRequestSender.processResponse(HttpRequestSender.java:608)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.HttpRequestSender.send(HttpRequestSender.java:352)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.CIMOMClient.sendImpl(CIMOMClient.java:205)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.CIMOMClient.send(CIMOMClient.java:153)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.CIMOMClient.enumerateInstancesImpl(CIMOMClient.java:450)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.CIMOMClient.enumerateInstances(CIMOMClient.java:754)
at com.sap.lcr.api.cimclient.CIMClient.enumerateInstances(CIMClient.java:989)
at com.sap.lcr.api.sapmodel.JavaCIMObjectAccessor.enumerateInstances(JavaCIMObjectAccessor.java:213)
at com.sap.lcr.api.sapmodel.SAP_DesignTimeConfigurationAccessor.enumerateInstances(SAP_DesignTimeConfigurationAccessor.java:164)
at com.sap.ide.dii05.lib.internal.sld.SldBasicContext.listRemoteDevConfNames(SldBasicContext.java:197)
at com.sap.ide.dii05.ui.internal.devconf.wizard.DevConfImportSldPage$6.run(DevConfImportSldPage.java:293)
at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:121)
NWDS version: 7.31 SP 09
Error Screenshot -
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
BR,
Anurag

Hi,
we had some issues recently with this, and the trace also mentions proxy issues. Could you please try direct connection in that preferences (in other words do not use proxy settings in NWDS) ?
Is it possible that there is some kind of web-filter application installed that is blocking the request?
I'd suggest to google for this error:
407 (Proxy Authentication Required ( Forefront TMG requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy filter is denied. ))
Perhaps the problem is not even sap related.
Is Microsoft Forefront TMG (Threat Management Gateway after some googleing) perhaps configured in the way that it is not allowing this request ? Perhaps the IT guys of your company could look into this.
Microsoft Forefront Threat Management Gateway - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
12209 Forefront TMG requires authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web Proxy filter is denied.
Cheers,
Ervin

Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape

Hello
I have created systems in system landscape, TMS is working fine, all the configuration steps are completed successfully.
am working in Solution Manager 4, in project change -SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN - Project Administration - in 'System Landscape' tab  Change request and when I activate change request management I am getting following messages:
1. Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape
2. The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created.
Its bit urgent as I m in middle of this activity, please assist me on the same
Thanks
Sharmishtha

Hello Jason & Prakhar
Thanks for your quick response. I am basis person, and configuring this change request management for one of the project.
Jason:
Will you please check with your basis person about these settings and let me know the same. I have set the settings as follows
C= Development (source system)
T = Quality
P = Production
Prakhar:
I have checked with all RFC connections are working fine, authorizations are also properly given.
I didnt get your point No correctly defined maintenance project exists, I have already created project in project administration transaction, assigned the system landscape, I have activated project IMG in IMG Project and then going in change request tab to activate the change request management, where its giving me above error.
More over, as you have mentioned I am getting following message in SLG1:
Project CHARM_GBW not found in the project administration table
This is asking me to do following things:
Synchronize the project in Change Manager with the Solution Manager. Call the Solution Manager with the transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN, and go to the 'System Landscape' tab, and then the 'Project Cycle' tab. Select the 'Change Request Management' field, and choose 'Refresh'. Project CHARM_GBW should then be available.
Where do I have to make entry for this? I can see the entry in /TMWFLOW/PROJMAP table too. I dont know what more I need to do for this.
Problem is I cant see Project Cycle tab in System Landscape. Prakhar, frankly I am not able to find any step wise document on this part. So will you please help me with some documents on this? I am from technical side thus there is bit difficulty to understand this scenario from functional view.
I will be grateful for your help,
Thanks
Sharmishtha

Related to System Landscape of XI

Dear All ,
I have a query related to the structure of system landscape of XI in the implementation project .
Do we create two clients for Development and QAS on the test system or we create just one client for Development and QAS ?
Thanks & Regards
Prabhat

Dear Udo ,
Thanks for the information but my question is somewhat related to client's creation on XI server .
As we know Development , Quality and Production sytem exists in normal system landscape .
Now I am putting Development and Quality on one XI server and Production on the another .
Keeping this in mind do I need to create 2 client's for Development and Quality or we should simply create one client on XI server which will work as development as well as quality client ?
Thanks in Advance
Prabhat

Project administration & system role

Dear All,
we are working with SAP ecc 6.0 implementation project . We r having solution manager 4.0. Our development system is having clients 220 as golden client, 230 the development client and 200 client is used as sandbox. The development team is doing configuration using solution manager. now the logical system in our system landscape of solar_project_admin we have assigned sandbox as the evaluation system. no other client is assigned. now we are planning to do buisness blue print &confign in golden client.
Need to know for buisness blue print and configuration , what is the role we need to give for our golden master client . can we map the golden master client as development system or evaluation system. pls help.
Thanking you
hany.

Hi,
The scope of your question is too huge to be handled in a forum like this. still I would list out out a few issues we faced during customer projects implementation and support:
1. First and foremeost - Business called for delivery related billing. We have a huge limitation here in PS, as PS is primarily designed for milestone billing. So be clear about your billing methodologies.
2. Related to material planning - Planned Indepnendent Requirement generation from PS and subsequent consumption of it from dependent requirements emanating from PS is problematic, as there are issues of traceability. So be cautious, if you are attempting something in this line.
3. PS is quite complex, Hence expecting users to be enlightened users would be futile.
There are many more..... We can continue the discussion, if you find it interesting.
Muraleedharan.R
091 9880028904

4 System Landscape // ChaRM // No Export System found

Hi Folks,
I got some problems with a 4 system landscape in ChaRM.
The error message I get when doing a consistency check within my SMI project is:
Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for NWA-303
Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N159
Transport route should be as follows:
DEV -> QAS -> INT -> PRD
Since I am still in testing phase I used clients instead of real systems in my configuration (TMS, Logical component,....)
My configuration looks like this:
NWA client 300 -> 301, transport layer ZCHM, transport layer SAP, consolidation
NWA client 301 -> 302, delivery
NWA client 302 -> 303, delivery
Logical Component defined as follows:
Developement System (Source: SAP): NWA:300
Type of Role: D Source System
Quality Assurance System (Source: SAP): NWA:301
Type of Role: O Target System
Integration System (Source: User): NWA:302
Type of Role: O Target System
Production System (Source: SAP): NWA:303
Type of Role: P Production System
Anyone got an idea what is wrong? did I miss anything?
The same configuration works for a 3-tier Landscape (without Integration System).
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi Raquel,
Ours problems with RFC and with connections had be corrected with the note below:
1833778 - Activate Change Request management - Check error
Thank you very much!!
Adriana

ChaRM with 4 system Landscape.

Hi, 
We are trying to implement ChaRM in a four system landscape 
 
AFD --> AFQ --> AFI --> AFP 
 
defined logical components, project, created maintenance cycle. U'gent correction works fine. 
 
but for regular correction, we are able to create TRs release it, but not getting imported into AFQ and of course further steps are not happening. When the status is "Development Completed", we perform "Log on to system", this pops up with a dialogue with options 
 
AFQ 200 
AFI 100 
 
to logon to system. 
 
This is the only clue we got. 
 
When we perform the actions, the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production". It doesn't obey the phases maintenance cycle as well, irrespective of the phases the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production" 
We are missing some minor thin's. 
 
Have we defined the system roles properly? IF not, how does the flow works perfectly fine with respect to U'gent correction. 
 
Please help. 
 
 
Regards, 
Ragu 
 

Hi Ragu,
I have a few questions here:
1. What normal correction type are you using - SDMI or SDMJ
2. What roles are assigned to the systems in Logical Components? I believe they are setup as Target Systems and thats why you get the pop-up with both systems when you execute 'Logon action' after 'Development Completed'
3. What is the STMS setup for this landscape?
4. Urgnt should behave properly coz it takes the shortest route to production. Can you check the tasklist of Urgnt and see if there are only 3 systems there?
Regards,
Kriti Bhalla

CTS Project in System Landscape

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for