Cube Logical table source doesn't show all cube members

hi,
Please help me solve this issue.
I have a logical dimension table whcih has a source from 10 different LTS each of them is a cube and have different number of members in it
Cube 1 has 1 member say A.
Cube 2 has 1 member say A.
Cube 10 has 3 members say A,B,C.
When I bring the column of the logical dimension table into Answers, I see the output from only Cube 1 i.e. A and does not bring in from the other cubes 10 which has members A, B,C.
Same is vindicated from the MDX query.
Is there a soln for this.
Regards,
Bhavik

Alright Bhavik, the belwo soln works fine with Oracle DB and you can try this with Essbase source:
You need to set Fragmentation Content here...
1) Create a dummy logical column in the logical table and map this to all LTS with some static values for each say 'A', 'B' etc
2) Now in Fragmentation Content for each LTS set that column filter with the value given in mapping like "LTS"."CATEGORY" = 'A'
3) Check the checkbox for this source shud be combined with other sources.
Now when you will run ur report based on this it will pick from all LTS. Currently, its only picking and pointing to ur first LTS. What we will do is to force BI server to have data from all sources.
Hope this is useful

Similar Messages

  • OBIEE: Incorrectly defined logical table source doesn't contain mapping

    In OBIEE 10.1.3.2 I have a very simple thing but cannot get it to work. Hopefully someone can point out the mistake. I have the same schema on two different database that I want to compare data.
    The schema is simple. Table (dimension) A has two columns: id and name. Table (Fact) B has two columns: id and value. Table B.id is a foreign key to A. I imported two database schema into the physical layer and for each database, I built the foreign key relationship between table A and B. In the logical layer, I have two logic tables, one to represent A (Dimension) and the other B (Fact) with a logical join. Each logical table has two data sources. For the dimension tables, both id and name columns have two sources. For the fact table, the id has two sources and for the value, I created two separate columns, one called value1 and the other value2 with one from one database's B table's value column and the other from another database's B table's value. They then were made available at presentation layer.
    Now in the Anwser, I can build a query with id from dimension and value1 from fact; it displayed fine. Same with a query with id from dimension and value2 from fact, it displayed fine. However, if the query is id, value1 and value2, I got the following error
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table B) does not contain mapping for [B.value1 [ ] , B.value2 [ ] ]. (HY000)
    Is there something I have to do additional to make both values appearing the same time.?
    Thanks for your help
    Ralph

    Hi, Siddhartha P
    I don't think I understand your information. I couldn't find connection pool at the business mapping layer. I only see it in the physical layer. Do you mean to do the mapping at the logical source table? That's only places I see any mappings and I don't see complex join there (only inner join, left outer, right outer and full outer) What mappings should I need to create between table B (fact table) of database 1 and table B (fact table) of database 2. I thought they don't have any relationship other than join through a dimension table which has columns that map to both table A (dimension table) of database 1 and 2. Then the logical fact table has 3 columns, one is id (to join to Dimension table) with two mappings (one to table B of database 1 and one to table B of database 2) and one column value1 which maps only to table B's value of database 1 and another column value2 maps to table B's value of database 2. That seems to be done correctly because I can pick column id and value1 or column id and value2 and have them displayed correctly but not all 3. I thought if it can display the two separately correctly, they should be able to display all 3. no?
    I am not getting any inconsistency error.
    There must be something I still don't understand. If you don't mind give me a little more direction, that would be great.
    Thanks
    Ralph

  • Workgroup Manager doesn't show all group members

    Hello,
    Workgroup Manager does not display all members of certain a certain group I defined a while ago. I figured out that it is very likely that the group record is corrupt - or at least it is not interpreted the right way anymore.
    What confused me are the different (Open Directory?) Attributes that could have to do with the problem:
    dsAttrTypeStandard:GroupMembers
    dsAttrTypeStandard:GroupMembership
    dsAttrTypeStandard:Member
    dsAttrTypeNative:memberUid
    dsAttrTypeNative:apple-group-memberguid
    I searched the UserManagement_Adminv10.4B.pdf for those keywords, but there is nothing in it. A Google search was of no help, either. Can someone help me with that?
    Cheers,
    Florian Schneider
    PowerBook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.7)   Server Admin Software 10.4.7
    iBook G3   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    Exporting the user list does not export the group list, or any related user info.  Including passwords.
    The only sure way to export and import users and groups with any automation is by using the archive feature in the OpenDirecroty tab in server admin.
    Do you still have the old 10.5 system?  If so, run the archive.
    On your new computer, demote the server to standalone.  Then promote it to master.
    Restore your archive on the 10.6 machine, and you should be back up and running.
    HTH
    -Graham

  • Code:10058. Incorrectly defined logical table source

    Hi experts
    I need to create Business model for which i have two fact tables in physical layer and both are connected to each other and one time dimension which is shared by both fact tables in physical layer and one dimension which is connected to fact2 that contain hierarchy. i want to create one fact table in BMM layer which should contain measures from both fact table......
    How to achieve this, any help on this..
    thanks & regards
    Edited by: ObieeUser on 06-May-2010 02:58
    Edited by: ObieeUser on 06-May-2010 03:00

    hi
    Go through this forum thread
    OBIEE: Incorrectly defined logical table source doesn't contain mapping
    try this steps
    Goto Business Model and Mapping Layer. There Fact table is present expend that fact table. You will find Sources option expend that sources option. In that option you will find sone table name that is present in Physical layer.Get the property of first table and there you can see in General tab in downward ADD option is there. click on ADD option new window is open and there three part is . right down contains some table select table from that table which we are joining and then click on select option. Now that table will added. you can change join type also. By default it is inner join. now refresh you page.
    i hope this will help you
    thanks & regards

  • Logical table source in BMM

    Hello,
    I am using obiee 11g.
    I have few doubts In RPD with respect to logical table Source.
    Consider i have tableA,tableB,tableC in PL.
    Now in my BMM i dragged tableA now i want one column from the tableB.
    So which method is correct?
    1>
    Go to the logical table source properties of tableA->then there + sign click and then add tableB left outer join with tableA.
    Here in the logical table source we see only one table tableA.
    2> Drag the tableB column so that we have 2 logical table source.
    Now what i am more interested is which method is selected on what basis?
    Any help?
    Thanks

    Thanks a lot for the reply
    Second case can u just elaborate more.
    First case i think i understood.
    My main confusion is ok ill explain my situation.
    I have tableA,TableB,TableC all are connected.
    Now i have one fact table.In that fact table i would like to create 10 measures.5 From tableA,3 from tableB and 2 from tableC.
    So
    First i created 5 measures from tableA.
    Second i created 3 measures from tableB.
    Third i created 2 measures from tableC.
    Till now i have 3 logical table source sources in one LTS.
    Now in my report when i combine columns from tableA and tableB , tableB column shows no data.
    When i see in the sql i see tableB col is not taken itself.
    Then i need to go to tableB,then go to General tab and then click + sign add tableA and then go to column mapping and map atleast one col of tableA here.
    So on what basis here i should do mapping.
    Since i have 3 logical table source sources in one LTS.Each time i click on sources->tableB->i could see even the
    tableA columns but not mapped?
    Is that every column from tableA should be mapped to tableB and tableB to tableC and tableC to tableA?I mean in the column mapping
    This is something which i am feeling very difficult to understand?
    Pls help me out?
    Thanks

  • RE:[nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table sourc

    Hi Experts,
    Actually we have a report by using X subject area and there are two users(Y,Z) accessing the report but for one user(Y) the report is looking fine for other user(Z) it is showing the below error
    but for both users having same permission on the X subject area.
    *[nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table ABC) does not contain mapping for .ROW_ID)*
    here in the report does not contain any column from the ABC fact table .
    weather this is an security issues or any technical issue because one user is getting the report and other user is not getting the report.
    Can any one guide me regarding the above issue...
    Regards,

    Since you have formatted the error message its not clear ROW_ID is from which table.
    Here I'll give few hints to cross check.
    1 There should be no key on fact tables in the Business Model.
    2 Use Complex joins, not Foreign Key joins, in the Business Model.
    3 All dimensions should have hierarchies defined
    4 Content tab settings
    Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Mar 26, 2013 10:03 AM
    It would be nice if you update your old post before you post new one, that helps you to get responses
    Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 18, 2013 6:32 AM
    Whats the solution or fix?
    Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 18, 2013 6:55 AM

  • How would multi Logical Table Source work?

    Hi All,
    I am facing a problem about multi Logical Table Source. Can I build a Business Model with a Logical Fact Table that have two Sources? Taking the below description as an example:
    Table Name
    Columns
    Description
    Fact
    TIMECD(2013Q101, which join to Time.TIMECE), DATA
    Fact_Aggr
    TIMECD(2013Q1, which join to Time.PERQUARTER), DATA
    Aggregate table for Fact and sum Monthly data to Quarterly
    Time
    TIMECD, YEAR, PERYEAR, QUARTER, PERQUARTER, MONTH, PERMONTH
    I tried to create a BMM that contains two Fact Table in the same Logical Fact Table. But BIEE shows the DATA from Fact even if I drag PERQUARTER into the report.
    The following is my question:
    1. Can I have a Logical Fact Table that contains Fact and Fact_Aggr?
    2. How will BIEE determine which DATA should be used?
    Best Regards,
    Martin

    The basic rule for one LTS vs two is:  If you use table A AND Table B together, then one LTS.  If you use table A OR Table B, then 2 LTSs.
    So when you have an aggregate fact table, you use either the Agg or the base fact, meaning you should have 2 LTSs.  OBI understands how to use one or the other through a variety of rules, but the main piece of config you need to have is proper levels defined on each and every LTS's Content tab.  In your example, you will need to make sure the grains of your aggregate and base fact table match the time dimension properly; thus normally you have a day table and a month table in the time dimension, each joining to the appropriate Fact LTS.  If you join a month level aggregate to a day time table your results will be incorrect.  OBI knows that month is higher in the hierarchy than day, so it will prefer to use the set of Month LTSs when it can.
    Jeff M.

  • Filter on the same logical table source on two logical tables is not working properly

    Hi,
    In the RPD, assume that I have a physical table named Employee_fact, created an Alias called D0 Employee Fact
    In the BMM I've two logical tables called Employee_fact_Type1 and Employee_fact_Type2
    Each of these logical tables has the same Logical table source - D0 Employee
    But in each logical table source, I've a filter in where clause
    such as, for Employee_fact_Type1  employee_type = 'XXX'
                 for Employee_fact_Type2 employee_type='YYY'
    These two facts are present in the same BMM and each of them are connected to two dimensions
    such as
    Dept_type1 <- Employee_fact_type_1 -> Tenure_type1
    Dept_type2 <- Employee_fact_type_2 -> Tenure_type2
    In analysis, When I query the columns from Dept_type1 and Tenure_type1, the database query generated shows the condition employee_type='YYY' instead of employee_type='XXX' .
    But, adding the columns from Dept_Type1, Employee_fact_type_1, Tenure_type1 it shows proper filter.
    I checked the relationships, presentation layer for the sources of presentation tables and everything looks good.
    Can anybody tell me what goes wrong here?

    did you set the content level as well?

  • Dynamically change the Priority Group of Logical Table Sources in OBIEE 11g

    Hi All,
    I have 2 Logical Table Sources(LTS 1 and LTS 2 for a Logical Table in BMM Layer).
    Example: Logical Table : Sample
    LTS Source 1 : Sample 1(Priority Group Set to 1)
    LTS Source 2 : Sample 2(Priority Group Set to 0)
    I have set the Priority Group of Sample 1 LTS Source to 1 and Priority Group of Sample 2 LTS Source to 0.
    I need to dynamically change the Priority Group of Sample 1 LTS Source to 0 if my role is DEVELOPER where role is a column in database.
    If my role is not equal to DEVELOPER then the Priority Group of Sample 1 LTS Source will remain same(1).
    Please suggest how can i achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Soukath Ali

    hello Soukath Ali,
    didi you find a way to dinamically changing Priority Group?
    thanks,
    Maria Teresa Marchetti

  • Problem: 1 physical table -- multiple logical table sources

    Hi,
    I'm quite new to BIEE and setting up my repository.
    So I have a question, if the following scenario is possible:
    Physical Layer: TABLE_A: COL_A, COL_B, COL_C
    TABLE_B: COL_D, COL_E, COL_F
    Join TABLE_A.COL_A = TABLE_B.COL_D
    In Business Model I have a Dimension Table with TABLE_A as datasource with fields DIM1 (COL_B).
    The Fact Table (MEASURE) would have twice TABLE_B as data source with different where-clauses on COL_F and logical table columns (ATT1 and ATT2) of value COL_E.
    So far I have created everything and the consistency check shows no errors or warnings, but I get an error in Answer: Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table MEASURE) does not contain mapping for [MEASURE.ATT1, MEASURE.ATT2], when I creating an report showing DIM1, ATT1, ATT2.
    Isn't it possible to have one physical column used as multiple data source?
    I know it 's working, when I create the physical table twice ... but maybe there's a solution for business model.
    Thanks
    chrissy

    Hi mengesh,
    that's what I also tried, but it's always returning me the same error.
    I know it would work, when I import the physical table twice or more, but that's not what I want to do, because at the end I have 10 or more fields based on this one physical table. There's one field indicating what value is contained in the record, this means:
    COL_F | COL_E
    1 | customer name
    2 | customer number
    3 | customer branche
    4 | salesman
    5 | date
    6 | report number
    etc.
    I don't think it's usefull to import the physical table as often as I need this field. So I want to divide it in business model.
    thanks
    chrissy

  • Max number of logical table sources

    Hi,
    I have one logical table based (a fact table) on 8 logical table sources. This is done to simulate some partitioning as my customer does not have an partition set up on data base level.
    Anyway my challenge is that a request fired in answers does not seem to take all logical table sources into account when building the physical SQL.
    The missing logical table source (the one not being part of the physical SQL) does not differ from the other logical table sources.
    Is there a limit of how many logical table sources BIEE can handle under one logical table?
    BIEE version: 10.1.3.4

    Alastair,
    thanks for replying.
    The logical tables sources partition the data by year. The aggregation level is the same for all LTS, the check for using this with other sources at this level is set and I've tried to force a result from every LTS (not combined but each LTS for itself). Forcing the results is done by using a dashboard prompt in answers filtering on year.
    The whole 'LTS-setup' works in combination with Oracle Warehouse Builder. What I mean by this is the following: In OWB I split the data from one table into 8 different tables, each containing 3 years of data (except for the oldest data where the number of years and amount of data will grow over time).
    This is done by comparing values of a year column with the actual year. E.g. the most actual table would contain data for the years 2010 - 2008, the next would contain data for 2007 - 2005, and so on.
    Now as the years in the different tables will change, I decided to establish an equaly changing counterpart in BIEE. Basically I defined some repository variables: actaul_year, three_years_ago, six_years_ago, 9_years_ago, etc.
    The fragmentation content of the different LTS is defined like this:
    most actual data: MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("3_years_ago")d
    next table: VALUEOF("3_years_ago") > MyModel.Year.Year AND MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("6_years_ago")
    next table: VALUEOF("6_years_ago") > MyModel.Year.Year AND MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("9_years_ago")
    etc.
    The funny thing is that the missing table is the one containing years 13 - 15. All the other tables (e.g. 16 - 18 years and 19 - 21 years) are represented in the physical SQL. This particular table is not even represented in the physical SQL.
    I haven't yet tried to take one of the 'working' tables out to see if this helps (getting an idea if there is a limit on number of LTS per logical table).
    Any idea?
    Thanks
    regards
    Andy

  • Union of more than 2 fragments/Logical Table Sources in BMM Layer

    Hi,
    I have come across many blogs which explain how to union two fragments/physical tables in a logical table source.
    Currently, i have a requirement where i have to combine/union 4 fragments/physical tables in a logical table source, say T1, T2, T3, T4 dimension tables.
    All have the same table structure, but differ in data.
    The requirement is to define dashboard prompt on the union of these tables and populate the values from all the tables.
    I am able to union two of the tables using a '>' and a '<' condition on a key column.
    But, am not able to union the other two tables.
    If i try to put more than 2 LTS, then the union fails.
    Please share your thoughts.
    thanks,
    Varun

    Hi Varun,
    What do you mean by the Union fails?
    You can have a logical table source in your business layer with 4 different tables as a source.
    Import the tables in the physical layer and create your joins.
    Then create a logical table in the Business layer and go in the table properties you will see that you can add as much tables as you want into the source (Map to these tables).there you can add all of your 4 tables and specify what type of join you want to have between them (inner, outer...)
    Regards
    Adil

  • Question related to Logical table source

    Hi All,
    I have very basic questions -
    (1) When do we create multiple logical table sources within a dimension?
    (2) If a dimension has more than one logical table sources , when do we need to map the underlying table to other underlying table of logical table sources.
    For exp consider these tables XLE_Entity_Profile, XLE_REgistration , AP_Invoice_ALL
    AP_Invoice_All is a fact table. relationship between XLE_Entity_Profile & XLE_REgistration is (1:M).
    Join info is as below -
    (a) XLE_Entity_Profile.Legal_entity_id = AP_Invoice_ALL.Legal_entity_id
    to get the registration of LE the where clause is as below-
    (b) XLE_Entity_Profile..Legal_entity_id = XLE_REgistration.Source_id and XLE_REgistration.Source_table = 'XLE_Entity_Profile'
    I have created the alias of XLE_REgistration as XLE_REgistration_LE.
    With in a dimension , i have 2 logical table source - XLE_Entity_Profile & XLE_REgistration_LE.
    logical table source 'XLE_REgistration_LE' has where clause 'XLE_REgistration.Source_table = 'XLE_Entity_Profile'
    When i query , LE name , LE Registration Name, i get error like -
    State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14070] Cannot find logical table source coverage for logical columns: [LE_NAME]. Please check more detailed level keys are mapped correctly. (HY000)
    Le Name is from XLE_Entity_Profile and LE Registration Name is from XLE_REgistration_LE.
    But when using the properties of logical table source ' XLE_REgistration_LE' , i map it to 'XLE_Entity_Profile' ,i get the correct result.
    I am not able to understand why am i getting error in first way of modeling.
    Thanks , Ashish

    Hi Ashish,
    first about logical table sources (lts): you can create different lts for aggregation and/or fragmentation. Aggregation means that data is aggregated on another level among different physical tables. Fragmentation means that the content is different over different tables (other rows).
    In your case, I think the problem is that your dimension is not denormalized, which results in a snowflake.
    What I understand is that you have the following (physical diagram):
    Invoice (fact table) >----- Entity (Dim) >----- Registration (Dim)
    You have the following joins:
    invoice.entity_id = entity.entity_id
    and entity.entity_id = registration.source_id and registration.source = 'something'
    First idea:
    I would create the following join (in physical diagram):
    Invoice (fact table) >---- Registration (Dim)
    Where:
    invoice.entity_id = registration.source_id and registration.source = 'something'.
    Then in your Entity dimension you should create a hierarchy:
    Grand Total Level
    Entity
    Registration.
    In your dimension you should create the first lts: Entity
    Set the aggregation content of this lts to Entity.
    This lts contains only one physical table.
    Map only the entity columns to the Entity physical table.
    Then create the second lts:
    Entity and Registration.
    Set the aggregation content of this lts to Registration.
    This lts must contain two physical tables, Entity and Registration.
    Map the entity columns to the Entity physical table and the registration columns to the registration physical table.
    Let me know if it works or not.
    Regards,
    Stijn

  • Package Body in the tree doesn't show all procedures

    I am using Sql Developer 1.0.0.14.67 on Win XP Professional,
    DB servers Oracle 9i on both Linux Red HAt and Win XP Professional
    I have troubles with one of packages - in the tree under Package Body SQL Developer doesn't show all procedures of this package body.
    On the right panel all package body source is shown, but in the tree under Package Body it shows names of only procedures up to certain line in the source code - up to line where first Private (not included in Package Spec) procedure code starts.
    BUT, there are more Public procedures in package body below this Private procedure - and all of procedures below first private are not included in the tree under Package Body

    I find this quite annoying. I cannot use the navigation panel on the left to find the location of all functions and procedures in the package body. The 'missing' procedures are listed under the package spec, and double clicking on them takes me to the spec and not the body.
    I'm running v1.2.1.32.13. Is this a know issue and is there a fix planned?

  • Dragging the columns to existing logical table source.....

    Hi,
    I am just learning OBIEE 11g and I am using a turorial from oracle it is
    "Creating a Repository Using the Oracle BI 11g Administration Tool" for practice purpose.
    In this tutorial it is saying that drag that columns from phscial layer to Logica Table Source
    in BMM Layer to avoid creating a second logical table source.. But when I am trying to drag the columns to
    existing logical source it is disabling I mean which it is not allowing .. is there any other technique to
    do it... or Am i wrongly approaching.. .The below is brief description in the
    tutorial.
    "Drag all six columns from D50 Sales Rep in the Physical layer to D5 Sales Rep in the BMM layer. This action
    creates logical columns and adds a D50 Sales Rep logical table source to D5 Sales Rep.
    Rename the D50 Sales Rep logical table source to LTS1 Sales Rep.
    In the Physical layer, expand D52 Sales Rep Position.
    Drag POSTN_DESC and POSTN_LEVEL from D52 Sales Rep Position to LTS1 Sales Rep. Note that you are
    dragging the columns to the logical table source, not the logical table. Dragging to the logical table would create a
    second logical table source.
    Drag DISTANCE from D51 Sales Rep Parent Child to LTS1 Sales Rep. Again, you drag the column to the logical
    table source, not the logical table."
    help would be appreciated.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sri_Oracle.

    Hi Sri,
    When you are dragging a physical column onto an existing Logical table source and if it does not let you do so, then it means that there is no physical join between the existing physical table(which the logical source is pointing to already) and new physical table (from which you are dragging the column now). So, please make sure, you have the join in place.
    Hope this helps.
    Thank you,
    Dhar

Maybe you are looking for