CUCM 8.6 QSIG to Nortel Option 81 No Caller ID

Working on an H.323 QSIG trunk to Nortel Option 81. Everything is working except caller ID on local calls. Cisco phones making local (7digit) calls only display the lead trunk (BTN) number for caller ID. Long distance calls display the correct caller ID. The Nortel has a separate local and LD trunks. Nortel phones have correct caller id displayed for both local and LD calls.
Topology/Call Flow
Cisco Phone -> CUCM -> 2911GW -> Nortel ->PSTN
Gateway is a 2911 running 15.0(1)M5
It looks like we are sedning the same information to the Nortel on both callS AND the Q931 information on both calls looks to be correct.
Local Call (Not Working)
*Sep 19 20:24:26.865: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x5429 callID = 0xD3B2 switch = primary-qsig interface = Network
*Sep 19 20:24:26.865: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x5429
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA98384
                Exclusive, Channel 4
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '4065565382'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '95998310'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
*Sep 19 20:24:26.941: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xD429
        Channel ID i = 0xA98384
                Exclusive, Channel 4
*Sep 19 20:24:28.077: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0xD429
Long Distance Call (Working)
*Sep 19 20:26:31.213: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Sending SETUP callref = 0x542A callID = 0xD3B3 switch = primary-qsig interface = Network
*Sep 19 20:26:31.213: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x542A
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA98383
                Exclusive, Channel 3
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '4065565382'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '912088306374'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
*Sep 19 20:26:31.293: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xD42A
        Channel ID i = 0xA98383
                Exclusive, Channel 3
*Sep 19 20:26:31.449: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- PROGRESS pd = 8 callref = 0xD42A
        Cause i = 0x81E4 - Invalid information element contents
        Progress Ind i = 0x8188 - In-band info or appropriate now available
*Sep 19 20:26:35.313: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0xD42A
So it apprears to be something on the Nortel side??? What can I check on the Nortel to see how these two calls are recieved and routed to the locan and LD trunks.

Have you had any luck solving this issue?
I am having the exact same problem. What I have found is that the local provider is saying that the number is not coming across in E.164 format which then appears to them as an unknown number so they just append either the main phone number to the caller ID or sometimes the phone number associated with billing contact. The nortel works just fine in both senarios, but there seems to be something lost in translation between the Cisco and Nortel. So far I haven't been able to find a setting to fix this.

Similar Messages

Delivering Caller ID via 28XX to Nortel Option 61

We would like to introduce caller ID into a phone system that is currently running a Nortel Option 61. Two PRIs will be terminated into two 28XX routers that will be frontending the Opt61. We are doing this to position ourselves to eventually migrate to IPT. The connection between the 28XX and the Opt 61 I am assuming will be PRIs running QSiG? Any gotchas out there or things I need to be aware of that people may have seen? No CUCMs yet so these gateways will be standalone caller id gateways for the OPtion 61. Any advice would be appreciated.

Hi Johnny,
You will probably want to use the 2-PRI (VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1) to maximize the 2800 series potential here;
VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 Support;
Any native HWIC slot on Cisco 2801, 2811,
2821, 2851, 3825 and 3845 and any VIC slot
on NM-HDV, NM-HDV2, NM-HD-2VE,
NM-2W, NM-1FE1R2W, NM-1FE2W-V2,
NM-2FE2W-V2
Cards, Ports, and Slots
Cisco 2801: 2 HWIC slots, 2 VWIC slots, 2 PVDM slots, 2 AIM slots
Cisco 2811: 4 HWIC slots, 1 expansion network module slot, 2 PVDM slots, 2 AIM slots
Cisco 2821: 4 HWIC slots, 1 expansion network module slot, 1 extension voice/fax module slot, 3 PVDM slots,
Cisco 3825: 4 HWIC slots, 2 expansion network module slot, 4 PVDM slots, 2 AIM slots
Cisco 3845: 4 HWIC slots, 4 expansion network module slot, 4 PVDM slots, 2 AIM slots
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5854/product_data_sheet0900aecd80169812.pdf
Hope this helps!
Rob
PS: We found the 2821's to be an excellent choice.

How to change the message in CUCM 7.1(2) " Your Current Options"

Hi,
Can any one help me how to change the system message in CUCM 7.1(2) " Your Current Options" to another text.
Thanks...

As far as I know you can't change that on CUCM.
On CME you can.
Bye,
Jan
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

VoIP between Norstar and Nortel option 11

Hi, i have some problems in the calls between a Norstar and a Nortel option 11, both are connected to a 2811 via E1 with the IOS is c2800nm-spservicesk9-mz.124-15.T3.bin both routers are using h323. We also have a Callmanager 5.1.2.3000-2 that interact with both PBX.
The problem is that when i make a call from the Norstar to the Nortell or CCM the call listens choppy and sometime the voice goes only one side.
Do you know of some debug that i can apply to see ISDN errors, h323 errors, or QoS errors.
Thanks in advanced
Jose

Well the IAD is configured for E&M immidiate which is completely different from R2 even though they are both a way to do CAS.
http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/tk755/tech_protocol_home.html
E&M:
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008020ecf6.html#wp1021994
R2:
http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800ad389.shtml
http://cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_tech_note09186a00800942f2.shtml

QoS - Nortel Option 11c thru 2811s

Looking for config assistance on a couple of 2811s, connected via a T1 that will carry voice traffic between 2 Nortel Option 11c's.
Will 'auto qos voip trust' on the serial interfaces suffice?
Does a 'map' function need to be defined?

Hi, that is the minimal config to protect voice traffic:
class-map voice
match ip dscp ef
policy-map test
class voice
priority percent 50 <--- you are allocating no more than 768 Kbps to voice
interface serial X/Y
service policy output test
Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!

1.call information such as call waiting,call forwarding, call holding is not working when caller the call me or im wait for my call i cant see any title by iphon , and also holding is the same.2. there is not any option for call baring.

Hi. please solve my problem.
.call information such as call waiting,call forwarding, call holding is not working when caller the call me or im wait for my call i cant see any title by iphon , and also holding is the same.2. there is not any option for call baring.3.playback music is not hearing by second partner during the call.4.i cant select ringing ton from saving tons.
thank you in advance.

Hi Ersin,
Exception 1 would seem to be FORMATTING_ERROR, which suggests something in the design of the Smartform. However, that doesn't fit with the form being generated from a report, but only erroring when called from a function module. I can think of no reason why the different calling method would be a factor.
When FORMATTING_ERROR is raise it should also set a message ID and number, are you able to determine what they are?
Regards,
Nick

Why not ios provides edit option before calling in keypad ??

Why not apple ios provides edit option before call through the keypad ?? Its a pain to save the number in order to edit it before calling

Suggest such to Apple:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

My ipad is not syncing with my iPhone. I am considering restoring it to default settings but are there other options (besides calling Apple)?

With apps, if I install an app on my iPhone that is also for iPad, it will go on my ipad, but if I delete the app on my iPhone it will not be deleted on my ipad. With photos, I have pictures on my ipad that are not on my iPhone and vice versa. With contacts, on my iPhone, everyone has their own ringtone, but on my ipad they're set to default. As I set up top, I am considering restoring it to default settings but are there other options (besides calling Apple)? I just want a second opinion.
Thank you to all who answer.

Currently, all opinions are set to ON in iCloud on both devices. On the iPhone, apps is set to ON, iTunes Match, Music, and Books are set to OFF. On the IPad, apps, iTunes Match, Music, and Books are set to OFF.

HT201303 my payment option problem call me 9994270834 & pls speak tamil

my payment option problem call me 9994270834 & pls speak tamil

Hi Stuart.
Thank you for your concern.
I have spoken to Rita (floor manager) who called me back this afternoon.
She looked at the account and could see that there was an open request on there for the call out charges to be removed, and suggested I wait. I explained to her that the Termination deadline of 28th July was looming and I didn't want to default and the account be closed. She understood what I meant and said the only thing I could do was to pay the bill (including the disputed charge). I could see no other way either given the speed of progress up to now so reluctantly agreed to do this. I feel a little bullied into this but the last thing I want is for the account to be closed and have to deal with someone else such as a debt collection company. I have been placed on a monthly payment plan so that I don't have to pay it all at once. which is welcome at least. This has caused me great stress and I feel a lot of it could have been avoided given better service. my complaint number is 52971381317.
Thanks.

CUCM 8.6 Integration to Nortel CS2100 SE16

Hey All,
Previously we had integration to a Nortel CS2100 working great via a SIP trunk.
Recently we had to upgrade the Nortel to SE16 and since then I have been having an issue with the following call flow.
1. Call originates from Cisco IP(SIP) phone to a Nortel TDM phone over the SIP trunk and if that TDM phone hunts to VM I get dead air for 11 seconds then the call drops. If the TDM phone is hard forwarded into VM then their is no issue, it is only when it hunts.
- I mentioned Cisco IP(SIP) above because it does not drop if it is from a SCCP phone like a 7925 WIFI phone or a soft client like IP communicator or even the SIP trunk I have for Microsoft Lync.
In looking at logs on RTMT I am now seeing re-invite inside a re-invite error(in red below) messages which you can see in the screenshot below (sorry for the blackout but infosec policy required it) . Anyone have any ideas? I do have a TAC case open but I am really trying to get this fixed before everyone comes back from the holiday.

Just wanted to update everyone on here with the details I found in the traces. CUCM was doing Early Offer to the Nortel side and the 200OK from Nortel still had 2 codecs listed rather than one causing CUCM to immediately Re-Invite with G./711ulaw only. It looks like the Nortel system doesn't know how to handle inbound early offer. Solution will be to turn off Early Offer on the CUCM SIP Profile.

CUCM 8.6(2) migration problem with external calls

Hello all.
Yesterday we have migrated our telephone infrastructure from CM4.x to CUCM8.6(2), after some weeks of tests.
Yesterday night all seems to work properly, all phone updated and registered, external calls going out and in.
But from this morning, with all users at work, it appears a strange problem, that until now I couldn't solve: randomly all external calls go down.
I can't address this problem, since gateways (all cisco 2811 routers) are the same and with same configuration as yesterday.
All thing that I can think is that router that seems to cause the problem is configured not with mgcp by cucm, but with h323 route inside the router.
Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Daniele

GW says normal call clearing.
But, maybe I've addressed the problem.
I've found a bug fixed into latest cucm release (8.6(2a)SU1) that say "h.323 calls improperly disconnected".
So I'm trying to upgrade from 8.6(2a) to 8.6(2a)SU1, but process fails :-(
I've tried from a dvd and also loading iso image from sftp, but after few minutes appears an error
08/04/2012 09:43:55 upgrade_install.sh|Started auditd...|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|Started setroubleshoot...|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|Changed selinux mode to enforcing|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|Cleaning up rpm_archive...|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|Removing /common/rpm-archive/8.6.2.21900-5|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|File:/usr/local/bin/base_scripts/upgrade_install.sh:599, Function: main(), Upgrade Failed -- (1)|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|set_upgrade_result: set to 1|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|is_upgrade_lock_available: Upgrade lock is not available.|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|is_upgrade_in_progress: Already locked by this process (pid: 1286).|
08/04/2012 09:43:56 upgrade_install.sh|release_upgrade_lock: Releasing lock (pid: 1286)|
I've rebooted server yet and problem remains.
Thanks for any other suggestions.
Daniele

Option to call one phone number when iPhone is locked and password protected

Dear Sir or Madam,
I have an idea which should be added to your iOS for iPhones. I think that many users would appreciate that and it could help to return a lot of lost iPhones to their owners. Even though I think that it could be used by emergency to contact the relatives in case something happen to the owner. The idea is to allow owner to define one or two numbers which could be called from the iPhone when it is locked and protected by password. Same option as it is for emergency nowadays.
Please try to consider it.
Thank you,
Yours sincerely,
Kamil Olah

http://www.apple.com/feedback/

Consuming web service:web service proxy option- service call(ECC6.0)

Hi,
<u>On SYSTEM A</u>
AS POC we have generated web service from BAPI_FLIGHT_GETLIST from ECC6.0.
0.we tested using web browser it was working fine.Then saved the WSDL to local pc
<u>On SYSTEM B</u>
1.I have created proxy using wsdl saved on local pc,
2. Created RFC Destination Type "H" giving the web service path
path : /sap/bc/srt/rfc/sap/ZBAPI_FLIGHT_GETLIST_WSD host & http port number.
3. created Logical port using LPCONFIG adn provided the RFC destination.
4. created service call from abap dynpro by using third option "web service proxy"
then selected the proxy generated above.
when i go to component controller context and see,
BAPI_FLIGHT_GETLIST
     exporting
       output
           FLIGHT_LIST
            <no elements under this>
Under FLIGHT_LIST i dont see the node Item then list of elements under that.
How to use this in view as such i dont see output individual parameters??
If i use function module and create service call
then i could see properly like and could use it in view.
BAPI_FLIGHT_GETLIST
   CHANGING
       FLIGHT_LIST
           AIRLINEID
Pointers will be suitable rewarded.
Regards
shekar chandra

AS per help
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/77/3545415ea6f523e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
its mentioned
Use
With the help of the service call function within a Web Dynpro component it is possible to call:
·         An existing function call
·         A method of an existing class
·         The proxy of a Web service
Prerequisites
If you wish to use the service call to include an existing function module into your Web Dynpro application, you can access available function modules in the current system.
Does it mean our ECC6.0 version? so we need to wait till that get resolved??

Resetting Nortel 1120e using CUCM

I have successfully (after 3 days!!!) managed to register a Nortell 1120e with my CUCM (Version 8.0.3.20000-2).
I am able to make calls and use the standard soft keys associated with the Standard sip profile.
The phone itself was set up as a 'Third Party SIP Device Advanced'.
The phone has registered on the correct Vlan and has a good IP address from the Voice scope.
The problem i have at the moment is trying to reset or restart the Nortel phone from call manager. If i make a change and want to reset/restart the phone to pick the changes up, i get no response from the phone.
The Nortel 1120e is currently running SIP firmware version 04.04.10.00.
PS Happy to share the process on how i achieved the registration as it seems to be a common problem.
Kind regards
Chris Mann

Thanks Dragan,
Good to hear that ESGF is definitely supported by Cisco equipment. Would definitely like to hear from someone that has connected to a Nortel PBX using ESGF and can confirm that the usuals work ie calling name / number in both directions etc.
Thanks also for the link - I had seen that but I msut say I'm not comfortable in connecting two PBxs directly with SIP trunks...considering they are on seperate networks and firewalls etc in between. I'd prefer to use CUBE in this case buit then there is the big licensing price tag with that
Cheers
Russell

Problem with PRI and Nortel Integration

We have a Nortel Option 81C connected to a 3825 MGCP gateway and we had a weird problem with it. The PRI looked fine from CallManager's perspective, but the PBX was showing that the first nine channels were in a Far End Make Busy state (FE MBSY) instead of being in IDLE state like CCM thought.
I did some checking around and found a weird "fix" for the problem that involved enabling and then disabled D-channel service messages on the PBX, but I'd like to find out more about this problem. I got the fix from a guy who has a LOT of experience with Nortel and with Cisco, and he said that 99 times out of 100, an FE MBSY problem like this is going to be because of the Cisco side, not the Nortel side.
I just did a bug search through CCM 4.1(3) and IOS 12.4(8) and I didn't see anything about D-channels being incorrectly reported as unavailable on PRI.
Have any of you ever heard of something like this?
Thanks!
John

John,
Our 81Cs are long gone, but the only ISDN switchtype that worked flawlessly for us was NI. We tried DMS100, and saw your problem. Nortel sees NI as a carrier side protocol and will not allow an inbound NI call to tandem through to another NI PRI. This forced us move all PSTN PRIs to CCM gateways early in out migration, but worked out well. I believe QSIG will also work, but it was a $20k upgrade for our PBXs, so was not an option.
Dave

CUCM 8.6 QSIG to Nortel Option 81 No Caller ID

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for