CUCM and UCCX JTAPI version 7.1(5) vs 7.1(5b)

Wondering if any one has CUCM 7.1(5) running with UCCX and what JTAPI version is being used? Then if anyone is running CUCM 71(5b) and if what version of JTAPI is being used? Running into bug on CUCM 7.1(3) CSCtb77537 and need to upgrade.

Hi
I recently had a cust with this problem on 7.1(3); upgraded them to 7.1(5) and all was well afterwards.
The version of JTAPI you use is the version of JTAPI that comes with whatever CCM version you install; so no point getting hung up on that - just remember to ensure all your JTAPI apps have their version upgraded to match (as with any TAPI apps).
Regards
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts..

Similar Messages

When do the CTI ports between CUCM and UCCX get created

Hi All,
I am trying to work out when the CTI ports between CUCM and UCCX get created.
Do they get created during the post installtion wizzard when you selectthe number of HR licenses or do you need to manually create the CTI ports after the post installation wizzard.
Many thanks for any help
Regards

In new versions (since 4.x) UCCX creates the CTI route points on Call Manager when a trigger is added on UCCX side.
When you add a Call Control Group on UCCX side, that process creates all the CTI ports in CUCM automatically or updates the existing ones if you change settings for the call control group.

Which are the lowest versions of UCM and UCCX with corresponding client software supported on Windows 7 64bit?

Hello,
currently using UCM 7.0(2) and CIPC 7.0.2 for hotline using UCCX 7.0(1) and Agent Desktop 6.6.54.
Which CUCM and UCCX Versions are needed to support Win7 64bit Client Software and which Version of CIPC can than be used?
We dont want to upgrade to latest versions yet! We only want to realise 64bit compatability for our clients. Therefore upgrading to lastest releases of UCM an UCCX would not be the correct answer.
My understaning of release documentation for this is following.
Win7 64bit supported when
UCM 7.0(2) using CIPC 7.0.4 or 8.6
UCCX 7.0(2) using CAD 7.0.2xxxx
Therfore we only have to do a maintenance update of UCCX from 7.0(1) to 7.0(2) to get new CAD Version compatible to 64bit.
Next we only have to update CIPC from 7.0.2 to 7.0.4 or 8.6 regardless of the UCM version because both newer CIPC version list CUCM 7.0 as compatible system.
I'm I right here????
Additionally is the expectable update cost free or does it bring any change in licensing?
PS: I know some other client software is not 64bit compatible in this solution like historical reporting client and so on. but this is no K.O. criteria and can be compensated otherwise.
Nachricht geändert durch erik

John Joslin wrote:
We don’t want people messing with the registry when they don’t need.
My apologies John I didn't realize that I was addressing the official custodian of Photoshop.
Incidentally my advice is intended for others in a similar situation who find themselves stalled during installation and otherwise contemplating a re-installation of Windows. I believe this would be obvious to most forum participants who had actually read my original post.

Migration of CUCM and CUCX

I plan to execute an upgrade of CUCM and CUCX from version 7.1.3.30000-1 to a version 9.1.1.20000-5 (CUCM) as well CUCX 7.0(1)SR05_Build504 to 9.0.2.10000-71(CUCX) respectively on a VMware ESXI 5.0 . I will be grateful if someone finds a little time to help me to make the upgrade plan
Cisco unified contact center express
Current version :Cisco application administration-7.0(1)SR05_Build504
                  pakage cisco unified ccx premium
                  cluster default
New version: Cisco Unified CCX Administration
             System version : 9.0.2.10000-71
Cisco Unified Call Manager
Current version :sysystem version 7.1.3.30000-1
New version:system version 9.1.1.20000-5
Please check the snapshot of the current versions
Regards
Akhilesh Nambiyath

Since you're a partner you should be able to go here, then it's time to do some reading
https://communities.cisco.com/community/partner/collaboration/migration?view=overview
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

Inconsistent JTAPI version between IP-IVR and CUCM

Hi,
we are experiencing a problem between CUCM and IP-IVR. Each time we try to log on IP-IVR administration, we can observe a message indicating that JTAPI versions between CUCM and IP-IVR are inconsistent. We have tried to synchronize versions using synchronize task from IP-IVR administration unsuccesfully.
The IP-IVR works fine, but the message is so annoying.
Any ideas?
Regards

If you are using a Linux CUCM and the associated IP IVR version for this, go to Start->Run and type 'cet'
Click No at the prompt
Click on ClusterDependentConfig
Double click on the node you are working on. Most likely the one with Key Value of 1
Click on the ClusterDependentConfig tab
Match the string next to JTAPI version to what is found in the jcu*.log in C:\
You may have multiple jcu.log files, so open up jcuCurrentLog.txt to see which one is the current log file.
It should take the form of "7.1(2.10000)-3" or similar.
Post back if you are not using a Linux version of CUCM and I'll give you the process for Windows.

Impact of Domain Controllers changes on Cisco Unity Ver 7.0(2.0) and UCCX ver ver 7.0(2) and CUCM ver 7.1.5.34900-7

Hi
Can someone please advise me about the following question
We are using CUCM ver 7.1.5 , Cisco Unity ver 7.0(2.0) and UCCX ver 7.0(2)
we already have a plan to upgrade them all to the latest versions but in the mean time a need came that we have to upgrade the domain controllers
as follows
Upgrade from Windows 2003 to Windows 2008
Domain Controller host names will change, however replacement servers will assume the IP of the old server as they are brought online.
Similarly, once the Domain Controllers have been upgraded, the existing Certificate Authority will also be moved from Windows 2003 to Windows 2008.
My question will be what will be the impact of this change to the above applications we are using in production
Thank you for your feedback and comments
Abdul

if it is possible email me your feed back to my email as below
[email protected]
thank you

Silent monitoring calls with CUCM 6.0 and UCCX 5.0

Dear all,
We have just integrated a 3rd party recording solution in our VoIP system, which consists of CUCM 6.0 and UCCX 5.0.
Until now we used the recording and monitoring solution of the UCCX for the agents. This worked ok.
But, as we wanted to record other people's calls and also the outgoing calls of the agents, we have created for them a Recording profile in the CCM and assign it to the agents phone.
We have also mantained the recording and monitoring active for them in the UCCX.
What is happenning now is the following:
- The 3rd party recordings works perfectly.
- The recording in the UCCX gets only one way audio.
- The silent monitoring gets only one way audio.
- If the 3rd party recording server is stopped, but the recording profile is stil active in the phones, the silent monitoring in the UCCX works.
Could any of you confirm if using a 3rd party recording solution the monitoring still works?
Is there any 3rd party silent monitoring software?
Thanks in advcance.
Best regards,
Amaia

We've got to delimit the problem.
When we use 3rd party recording solution there are 4 RTP flows: 1 incoming to monitored/recorded phone and 3 flows outgoing.
1 incoming RTP flows
- voice of remote phone
3 outgoing RTP flows
- voice of monitored/recorded phone
- voice of monitored/recorded phone sent to 3d party recording server
- voice of remote phone sent to 3rd party recording server
When we use a network analyzer we see that the agent running in the PC (UCCX 5.0) establishes two RTP flows for the monitoring session. But we can see that one of these flows sends 3 packet RTP per 1 packet RTP sent in the other RTP flow (in the same time).
We think agent sends to monitoring device all the outoing RTP packets of the phone (that belong to three different RTP flows), instead of sending only the RTP packets belonging to voice of monitored/recorded phone.
The other flow, voice of remote phone, sounds fine.
Is there a solution to avoid this problem when we monitor with UCCX 5.0 and record with a 3rd party software at the same time?
Thanks,
Christian

JTAPI version

Hi,
We are using UCCX version 5.0(2)SR3.Is there any way to find out what JTAPI version we are using through GUI or command except compatibility guide which shows what all Call Manager version are compatible?
ergds,
aman

UCCX simply downloads the JTAPI installer from CUCM and installs it. Whatever version of the TSP is bundled with CUCM will be what CCX runs. This will hold true even in 8.x where CCX has turned to GNU/Linux. All the compability matrix shows is what versions of CUCM/JTAPI the CCX BU has tested.

Configure Jabber for Mac with local CUCM and WebEx Connect

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has been able to configure the Jabber for Mac 8.6.2 client to use the WebEx Connect presence server with a local CUCM and Unity Connection servers. The preferences accounts tab does not show or allow the addition of the voice services. I have added from a working local CUCM preferences plist file what I believe are the correct entries however I still cannot see the accounts on the preferences tab. We currently do not have a local cisco presence server hence the requirement to trial the WebEx Connect server as I can't get past the first configuration step without it.
regards
paul

Hi - I have done this via the admin portal but still cannot get the Jabber client for Mac to register for voice. The Windows version works fine for the same user and CUCM device. Are there any other settings that need to be enabled specific to the Mac client?
Thanks.

Is there any difference in the prompts of UCCX 7 (Windows based) and UCCX 9 (Linux based) ?

Are the prompts for UCCX 7 (windows based) and UCCX 9 (Linux Based) are different ?
There are no default prompts available in the script editor folder of UCCX 9.
I have downloaded some prompts from the internet with .wav format, but those prompts are not working.
Can someone tell me if the prompts are different and if they are really different, where to get those prompts then ?
I have also attached the prompts i have downloaded from the internet.

Nope, there's no difference. UCCX uses either G711 or G729 encoded files. You have to encode them first before you upload them. UCCX will not encode them like CUCM does for MOH files. In fact, you can use CUCM's MOH file encoding to encode your files for use within UCCX.
Also, you will not see the system prompts on your workstation where you installed the script editor.
What is it that you are trying to do?
Anthony Holloway
Please use the star ratings to help drive great content to the top of searches.

I have added two new extension on CUCM, Directory not showing in attendant console even after resynch on CUCM and attendant cosn

I have added two new extension on CUCM, Directory not showing in attendant console even after resynch on CUCM and attendant cosnole
Any idea?

Hello,
Can you tell us what versions of CUCM and CUxAC you are using? Just extensions alone in CUCM will not sync to the corporate directory within the attendant console application. You will at least have to have user's associated with those extensions and depending on your rule set within the console that should then bring those extensions into the console directory.
Thanks,
Tony

Cucme and cucm with aim-cue

Hi all, I just want to know if AIM-CUE can work with cucme and cucm 8.0?
Because based on this matrix Cisco Unity Express Compatibility Matrix [Cisco Unity Express] - Cisco Systems
It says that it is supported, but CUE (AIM-CUE Module) should have a version of 7.2 or 7.3 to support cucme 8.x and cucm 8.x
Can anyone confirm this because aim-cue is the cheapest among the CUE cisco offers. Thanks!

That's what I read, having cue 7.2 or 7.3 will let you use cucme/cucm 8.x
When you say "there will not be any new firmware release on the old aim-cue", Does that mean that cue version 7.3 will be the last firmware version to be released on the old aim-cue that will support cucme/cucm 8.x? Future versions of cucme/cucm (version 9) will not be supported by the old aim-cue?

BE5K to Virtual CUCM and Unity Connection 10.5(2)?

Hi,
I am migrating a CUCM and Unity Connection 8.6 from physical server to CUCM and Unity 10.5(2) and I estimate about 2-hour effort with PCD to migrate the CUCM to be ready for testing. Not sure about Unity Connection Part though. The physical server is serving 120 users with 3 remote locations(via MGCP) and complex integration with other systems. I only done greenfield deployment before...no migration/upgrade experience...
Simple/not simple questions:
1. Will the 2-hour be enough for CUCM?
2. PCD doesnot seem support migration of Unity Connection to 10.5. What is the recommended approach? Gradually move data or cutover?
3. From your experience, how long it takes for upgrading/migrating Unity Connection?
I have these 2 documents from Cisco as my reference, any other recommendations?
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/ucmapMigrate/10_5_1/CUCM_BK_M24251C0_00_migrate-procedure-for-cucm_1051/CUCM_BK_M24251C0_00_migrate-procedure-for-cucm_1051_chapter_01.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/10x/upgrade/guide/10xcucrugx/10xcucrug022.html

Thanks for pointing it out. I did not realize BE5K is not supported by PCD.
Will this be my next best bet then:
Install version 8.6.2 VM in ESXi
Export info using BAT from BE5K
Import info into 8.6.2 VM on ESXi
Upgrade the 8.6(2) VM to v10.5.x (via PCD I guess)
Test then discconnect BE5K
If I am correct, will 4-hour be enough?
I also saw some other suggested to do in-software upgrade to 9.x than export... I just feel that is too risky...BE5K is already a single point of failure what happens if in-software upgrade failed...

Upgrade from CUCM and Unity 3.x to CUCM Business Edition 8.5

I'm trying to find the recommended upgrade path from CUCM 3.x and Unity to 3.x to a single CUCM Business Edition 8.5 server. As far as I can see there is no migration strategy from call manager cluster environment to a Business Edition environment. If there isn't has anyone done this and if so what steps did you take. As it stands right now I'm thinking of building it fresh but I would think there would be some more efficient way to do it. Any suggestions?

Hi Philippe
Not necessarily. If you're going to BE6K, then there should be a path to upgrade each of your applications from their current versions. As BE6K implements CUCM and CUC as separate VMs, you should simply be able to follow the well documented mechanisms to upgrade these platforms.
If you're going from Unity to CUC (any versions), then you'll need to use COBRAS for this available form the unitytools web site.
The method I've used for for CUCM upgrades (7.1(5) and higher).
1. Build CUCM under VMware at the same release as your physical appliance with same IP address and hostname (obviously put this on an isolation VLAN).
2. DRS backup current PUB and DRS restore onto new VM.
3. Upgrade new VM PUB to whichever release you want to get to following standard upgrade instructions. Note you may need to get a temporary V7 license from Cisco for this, otherwise you may not be able to upgrade (you'll receive a message saying upgrades not allowed in grace license period).
4. Rehost existing CUCM licenses. If you're going to V9, carefully check your license status before doing the upgrade. There's a few gotachs here, one recent one is that analog devices attached to VG2XX gateways now consume licenses whereas they didn't in earlier versions of CUCM.
If you're going to BE5K then it will be a manual process start to finish using BAT for CUCM, although COBRAS should work for Unity to CUC.
HTH.
Barry Hesk
Intrinsic Network Solutions.

Can you sync PINs between CUCM and Unity Conneciton

I am using the latest 8.6.x versions of CUCM and Unity Connection. I know that you can LDAP integrate both to (indirectly) keep the passwords synchronized, but is there are way to keep the PIN in CUCM and the PIN in Unity Connection synced?

No there is not. This is a common feature request; feel free ot reach out to your Cisco AM and express your interest in it.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

CUCM and UCCX JTAPI version 7.1(5) vs 7.1(5b)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for