CUCM Security - Are Jitter, Latency and Packet Loss Stats in Clear Text ?

I've reviewed the Cisco Unified Communications Manager Security Guide and see no suggestion that implementing encryption prevents MoS scoring.  In other words, when you implement encryption, do you still have access to jitter, latency and packet loss information in clear text?
TIA,
Amir

Well.. the phones measure the statistics.
The phones then report the stats to CUCM for inclusion in the CMRs.
... as I recall this is done via SCCP.
So yes, it's clear text, unless your signalling is encrypted generally. On most clusters it's not.
Aaron

Similar Messages

  • Latency and Packet Loss Issues

    About a week ago, my internet began to have high latency (stable at around 250), and a small amount of packet loss. Since then, the latency has died down, going back to normal but every minute or so jumping back up to about 250 +/- 250 for about 30 seconds before going back down. The packet loss came about occasionally, and only around 1-2%, but earlier today was at about 10% and wouldn't drop.
    From what I can tell, all of the issues appear randomly with nothing making them appear. Nothing has changed since before this started, it just came out of the blue.
    I use a wireless connection as an ethernet cable won't reach to my PC.
    Here are some ADSL stats:
    ADSL Line Status
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 00:27:29
    Downstream:
    12.05 Mbps
    Upstream:
    1.047 Mbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Fast
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    3.1 dB / 6.6 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    33.0 dB / 19.0 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.8 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    0 / 51170
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    3877 / 63769
    All help would be appreciated and any information needed, i can supply. 
    Thanks.
    Edit: Also, here is a Netalzyr test if that shows anything!
    http://n2.netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/restore/id=43ca208a-9404-ae6b5d67-4e6f-4678-9c9f/rd#

    I did a quiet line test earlier, with a cordless phone. There was a humming which i think was just normal, but about 30 seconds in there was a crackle which lasted about half a second. I kept it on for about 2 minutes before turning it off.
    ADSL Line Status
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 01:03:32
    Downstream:
    12.05 Mbps
    Upstream:
    1.047 Mbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Fast
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    3.9 dB / 6.4 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    33.0 dB / 19.0 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.8 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    0 / 51170
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    10528 / 63798
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    2113 / 399492
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    2781 / 8577
    Also here is another one of the ADSL stats at 1 hour connection time.

  • VoIP Phones - Testing Latency, Jitter, and Packet Loss

    I am having big problems with my VoIP phone connection and I'll try to lay it out clearly here.
    The main telephone system resides at Location A (static IP address - see below - xxx.xxx.206.19), which has a network connection of 50MB down/20MB up (i.e., very fast).  The VoIP phone configured for that system resides at Location B, which has a network connection of 10MB down/1MB up (i.e., also fast, or at least fast enough "on paper" for a quality VoIP connection).  The LAN at Location A uses an Airport Extreme router, which does not have QOS or EF capability. The LAN at Location B uses a D-Link DIR-655 router which does have QOS that is configured properly to direct all traffic to the VoIP phone's IP address.
    The VoIP phone at Location B is having intermittent call quality problems with skipping of words, hollowing out noises, jittery conversations, etc.  All the inquiries I've made to the ISPs and phone system manufacturer (ESI) suggest that my base Internet speeds are not the problem.
    I'm told, instead, that the problem might be latency, jitter, or packet loss between Location A and Location B.  This leads to several questions:
    (1)     Is there any Mac software that can test latency, jitter, and packet loss? I've looked at Network Utility and it seems to only measure a few things. 
    (2)     Does anyone see anything in the following Traceroute and Ping results (done twice from Location B to Location A) that looks problematic to VoIP quality?:
    Traceroute:
    First run: Traceroute has started…
    traceroute to xxx.xxx.206.19 (xxx.xxx.206.19), 64 hops max, 72 byte packets
    1  alfirving (192.168.0.1)  0.569 ms  0.363 ms  0.302 ms
    2  10.72.28.1 (10.72.28.1)  27.567 ms 18.161 ms  22.288 ms
    3  70.125.216.150 (70.125.216.150)  9.841 ms  10.346 ms  9.497 ms
    4  24.164.209.116 (24.164.209.116)  11.042 ms 8.298 ms  9.433 ms
    5  70.125.216.108 (70.125.216.108)  21.068 ms  20.657 ms  12.045 ms
    6  te0-8-0-2.dllatxl3-cr01.texas.rr.com (72.179.205.48)  11.154 ms  11.540 ms  24.495 ms
    7  107.14.17.136 (107.14.17.136)  11.994 ms  14.217 ms  15.816 ms
    8  ae-3-0.pr0.dfw10.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.209) 14.566 ms  32.670 ms  15.947 ms
    9  ix-0-3-2-0.tcore2.dt8-dallas.as6453.net (209.58.47.105)  11.647 ms  12.260 ms  12.386 ms
    10  if-2-2.tcore1.dt8-dallas.as6453.net (66.110.56.5) 10.023 ms  12.285 ms  12.338 ms
    11  209.58.47.74 (209.58.47.74)  17.641 ms 16.741 ms  16.372 ms
    12  0.ae2.xl3.dfw7.alter.net (152.63.97.57)  11.584 ms  12.315 ms  12.890 ms
    13  0.so-6-1-0.dfw01-bb-rtr1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.1.90)  13.812 ms
        0.ge-3-0-0.dfw01-bb-rtr1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.1.17)  18.831 ms
        130.81.23.164 (130.81.23.164)  14.189 ms
    14  p14-0-0.dllstx-lcr-05.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.40) 14.561 ms  13.621 ms  15.544 ms
    15  * * *
    16  static-xxx.xxx.206.19.dllstx.fios.verizon.net (xxx.xxx.206.19)  23.125 ms  24.136 ms  22.411 ms
    Second run: Traceroute has started…
    traceroute to xxx.xxx.206.19 (xxx.xxx.206.19), 64 hops max, 72 byte packets
    1  alfirving (192.168.0.1)  0.603 ms  0.420 ms  0.324 ms
    2  10.72.28.1 (10.72.28.1)  40.494 ms 26.625 ms  14.152 ms
    3  70.125.216.150 (70.125.216.150)  9.431 ms  9.660 ms  9.018 ms
    4  24.164.209.116 (24.164.209.116)  16.293 ms  12.339 ms  19.252 ms
    5  70.125.216.108 (70.125.216.108)  15.801 ms  11.438 ms  12.068 ms
    6  te0-8-0-2.dllatxl3-cr01.texas.rr.com (72.179.205.48)  23.221 ms  30.459 ms  17.519 ms
    7  107.14.17.136 (107.14.17.136)  14.611 ms  15.696 ms  15.775 ms
    8  ae-3-0.pr0.dfw10.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.209) 17.643 ms  14.812 ms  16.294 ms
    9  ix-0-3-2-0.tcore2.dt8-dallas.as6453.net (209.58.47.105)  11.169 ms  12.374 ms  9.849 ms
    10  if-2-2.tcore1.dt8-dallas.as6453.net (66.110.56.5) 16.453 ms  12.168 ms  12.384 ms
    11  209.58.47.74 (209.58.47.74)  18.015 ms 14.867 ms  16.432 ms
    12  0.ae2.xl3.dfw7.alter.net (152.63.97.57)  11.471 ms  11.993 ms  12.395 ms
    13  0.ge-6-3-0.dfw01-bb-rtr1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.96.42)  14.077 ms  29.153 ms
        0.ge-3-0-0.dfw01-bb-rtr1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.1.17) 17.962 ms
    14  p14-0-0.dllstx-lcr-05.verizon-gni.net (130.81.27.40)  14.629 ms  12.297 ms  12.839 ms
    15  * * *
    16  static-xxx.xxx.206.19.dllstx.fios.verizon.net (xxx.xxx.206.19)  24.976 ms  22.170 ms  22.376 ms
    Ping:
    First Run: Ping has started…
    PING xxx.xxx.206.19 (xxx.xxx.206.19): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=22.814 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=24.621 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=24.711 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=3 ttl=242 time=24.109 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=4 ttl=242 time=23.336 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=5 ttl=242 time=25.644 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=6 ttl=242 time=27.755 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=7 ttl=242 time=25.135 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=8 ttl=242 time=22.443 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=9 ttl=242 time=24.635 ms
    --- xxx.xxx.206.19 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 22.443/24.520/27.755/1.448 ms
    Second Run: Ping has started…
    PING xxx.xxx.206.19 (xxx.xxx.206.19): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=27.183 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=24.629 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=22.511 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=3 ttl=242 time=39.620 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=4 ttl=242 time=26.722 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=5 ttl=242 time=23.183 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=6 ttl=242 time=25.171 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=7 ttl=242 time=24.412 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=8 ttl=242 time=23.837 ms
    64 bytes from xxx.xxx.206.19: icmp_seq=9 ttl=242 time=23.785 ms
    --- xxx.xxx.206.19 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 22.511/26.105/39.620/4.713 ms
    (3) Any other ideas on what my call quality problem might be, or how I can tweak it?  For example, would putting a DIR-655 router at Location A and enabling QOS really make a difference?
    Thanks to everyone, and I hope this is not too long or difficult to understand.

    Hey thanks for your reply  Yeah im only getting 1 ro sometimes 2 bars reception so hopefully the antenna will beef things up but I think it is what it is perhaps.  

  • High ping and packet loss.

    How do i fix high ping and packet loss?  Also when i ping my own ip, it results in 100.0% packet loss.

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
    Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you turn on the computer, and again when you log in.
    Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
    Safe mode is much slower to start up and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
    The login screen appears even if you usually login automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
    Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
    After testing, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

  • Security and packet loss problem

    Guys,
    I'm using WRTP54G-NA and I have 2 problems with it...
    First one: is about security, if I access direclty http://192.168.0.1/admin/voice or any other subfolder it doesn't ask me the password...
    The other problem is that I can't let my connetion 100%, It always has packet loss, in both way, wired and wireless (more in wireless), I had already tried to fix the Negotiation to 100Mbps Full duplex, changed the MTU values for different values and there is always packet loss...
    I tried to plug my pc directly to the cable modem and it works perfectly...
    I'm using firmware version 3.1.24, I also tried with 3.1.27, but with 3.1.27 the number of problem increases including now ones...
    Any advice ??
    http://brunozp.com || http://brunozp.com.br
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I don't think that the rotuer will ask you for username & pasword once you login to setup page ... Only once it will show you the same when you are typing http://192.168.0.1 on the browser address bar ...

  • Very slow upload speeds and packet loss

    I have the exact same issue as the following threads.
    https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity-Speed-Connection/Very-bad-connection-Packet-Loss-very-low-up...
    https://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity-Speed-Connection/extremely-low-upload-speeds-and-high-latenc...
    My download speed is around 36M and my upload speed on speed tests either fails to connect or I get around 0.5M. Pinging google leads to frequent none responses, probably on average 1 in ever 8 pings fails.
    I have rebooted the router, reset the router to factory settings and disconnected all devices apart from 1 clean CentOS desktop pc to do the speed test and still get the same results. Could someone please give me details so I can get this investigated properly and soon as it is effecting my work.

    Still experiencing unusable upload speeds, can someone please help me with this? Below is todays test.
    FAQ
    1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
    Download Speed
    37.88 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    38.71 Mbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 37.88 Mbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speedsis 20 Mbps-38.71 Mbps .
     Additional Information:
     IP Profile for your line is - 38.71 Mbps
    2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
    Upload Speed
    0.31 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    10 Mbps
    Max Achievable Speed
    Upload speed achieved during the test was - 0.31Mbps
     Additional Information:
     Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 10 Mbps

  • Username and Password is sent as clear text while accessing external Application

    While accessing external application from SSO, the username and the password is sent as a clear text even though the form method is given as POST. Actually the potal opens a new window and it disables the address bar. Still the user name and password is visible in the status bar. Is there any wor around for the same

    <S12:Envelope xmlns:S11="..." xmlns:wsse="..." xmlns:wsu= "...">
    <S12:Header>
    <wsse:Security xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">
    <wsse:UsernameToken xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd">
    <wsse:Username>TestUser</wsse:Username>
    <wsse:Password Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">TestPassword</wsse:Password>
    </wsse:UsernameToken>
    </wsse:Security>
    </S12:Header>
    </S12:Envelope>

  • 4G jitter and packet loss - Solutions?

    Hi there I have recently purchased a 4G dongle as the ADSL into the house is woefully slow. My primary use is for gaming but I am finding that my online experience has been very underwhelming. Upon testing I found the service to have a jitter of 20-30ms and I suspect I am losing packets also. My question is- is there a solution for this? I have ordered a high gain signal booster (MIMO TS9 antenna), will this help?

    Hey thanks for your reply  Yeah im only getting 1 ro sometimes 2 bars reception so hopefully the antenna will beef things up but I think it is what it is perhaps.  

  • Balance Sheet and Profit Loss Statement

    Hello everybody,
    i have an issue concerning the transaction f.01 meaning the displayed data.
    when i start the transaction i enter the needed data for display, screenshots on [www.prikorai.puslapiai.lt/laurio/sap/]
    and then the data displayed isnt showed right.
    what i mean is that i.e.
    Reporting period (01.2008 - 07.2008) shows ammount of 139.904,77, whereas it should be shown as
    Comparison period (07.2008 - 07.2008) shows 365.218,20
    this kind of data anomaly isnt in all places but it appears
    Best Regards
    Laurynas Prikockis

    What i ment is that when the report is generated some of the ammounts dont match.
    as an example i wrote about the reporting and comparison periods. in one period (comparison) an ammount is shown right (as in GL Account) whereas the reporting period doenst show right numbers.
    take a look at the attacht URL. youl find there a MS Word document which shows the start of the TC and data entered, the second screen shows the difference between compared periods.
    those periods were;
    REPORTING PERIOD and COMPARISON PERIOD,
    the date for these were
    REPORTING PERIOD (01.2008 - 07.2008) and
    COMPARISON PERIOD (07.2008 - 07.2008),
    if i am right this kind of selection should result me equal numbers in each of the periods. (THE DIFFERENCE should be = 0)

  • Safari 2.x vs FireFox v2.x and authentication (passwords sent as clear text

    Hi All,
    first time poster here. I have been asked by a colleague if Safari 2.x under OS X 10.4.x behaves in the exact same manner as FireFox 2.x - specifically with regard to authentication challenges and sending text in the clear. In safari, He has stated that when accessing a specific proxy site with auth the dialog box say that the password will be sent in the clear.
    Advice, correction, suggestions from anyone would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Ed Cox
    NSW DET ITD.
    [email protected]
    iMac 20" dual Core   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

    egillis, welcome to Discussions!
    This is really a developer question. Though someone may answer it here, you may have better luck posting in Safari's own development forum.
    See this post for a couple of links.
    Hope this helps!

  • Non-Immersive Endpoints Call Statistics Reports - jitter, packet loss

    Hi,
    We are trying to have reports from calls of Non-Immersive Endpoints. We need to have info about jitter and packet loss.
    I know it is saved in the logs in file called call_history.txt and available via Web interface under "Diagnostics - Call History".
    Issue is how to collect/download such data from Non-Immersive Endpoint automatically. I am not talking about download logs, extract the files, go to specific folder and open specific file. 
    We have such reports for Immersive Endpoints because Call Statistics are included in MIB.
    Any idea/experience to collect such data from Non-Immersive Systems?
    Many thanks,
    Josef

    @Raju_raju
    Many thanks for this - its what I expected but its still disappointing to hear. I think Microsoft are missing a trick here, even WebRTC (in Chrome at least) and most other conferencing applications have call statistics built in.
    The lack of true real time monitoring in Lync out of the box worries me somewhat. I know that there might be third party options, including Microsoft's own SCOM (which of course, not everybody uses), but I would like to see some real time monitoring of this
    real time system as part of its native functionality. True stats available at the client would still be a great help - even if it meant a ALT+Click type procedure.
    I need to dig deeper into the normal Lync monitoring options but I'm used to environments where we can analyse each "video hop" as often, there are specific network segments that cause glitches. For instance, in a call where media is routed via
    an edge, I would liek to see the stats on the leg from the client to the edge then from the edge to the FEP or Director etc.
    Thanks for the heads up on the Snooper documentation. I have read this page previously but will re-visit, yet this is somewhat over kill for some basic real time statistical output.
    @Eric - Great table. I must say I have never come across this and it certainly has useful stuff. I can almost understand why Microsoft shows the simplistic feedback by default, but for an advanced user or engineer having to look up the dumbed down feedback
    against such a table is simply a waste of time. The actually stats (including both percentage and raw packet loss data) is eminently more useful and immediate.
    Microsoft - are you listening?
    Chris

  • High Packet Loss, High Ping and Slow Connection Ov...

    Hi There,
    I have been a customer with the BT unlimited broadband package for a little under two years and up until recently have had no real issues with the service. This was until around 3/4 weeks ago I noticed that the internet was very slow and certain online games or applications like Netflix would lose all of its quality or stop completely. At first I thought nothing of it and simply reset my BT Home hub router, and sure enough everything was back to normal. However after around 2-3 hours of moderate use (gaming online or watching Netflix) the problem surfaced again.
    Now I am lucky if I can get the entire way through a 40 minute TV episode before the quality drops and/or the service requires buffering. I have already contacted BT via the helpline and the service lady ran through the obligatory steps (turn off, wait 5 minutes, reset the home hub etc.) but she failed to understand that although rebooting the home hub does alleviate the problem initially, the symptoms of a slow connection, high packet loss and high ping always return within an hour.
    Four the last couple of weeks I have been trying to investigate the problem myself and I have done the following things:
    Tested the line using the master socket (no difference)
    Opened the ports on my firewall within the home hub (no difference)
    Directly wired in the computer instead of relying on the wifi (no difference)
    Tested for interference from neighbours wifi using inSSIDider office (it wasn’t, operating on different channels)
    Switched every device that requires internet off apart from the PC (no difference)
    So with all that in mind I am fairly confident that it is nothing within my house that has caused a significant reduction in internet quality.
    Now I have tried my best to display the problem I am having by recording the connection quality for the last 24 hours. The table below represents the condition and quality of the connection after leaving it a period of time without resetting:
    ADSL Line Status
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 21:52:14
    Downstream:
    12.96 Mbps
    Upstream:
    910 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    6.7 dB / 5.4 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    29.4 dB / 16.4 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    987297 / 12745
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    254 / 15268
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    2437 / 252630
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    189 / 36430
    And here is a result of the ping and packet loss during this time:
    Now I immediately reset the home hub after running that test and ran the test again. These are the results I a achieved within 2 minutes of internet connectivity:
    ADSL Line Status
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 00:01:05
    Downstream:
    13.77 Mbps
    Upstream:
    910 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    6.4 dB / 5.6 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    29.4 dB / 16.4 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    159 / 12746
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    1 / 15573
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    0 / 252639
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    1 / 36438
    Even within the time it has taken to compose this page my internet quality has nose-dived from the previous result above to the following: 
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 00:52:31
    Downstream:
    13.77 Mbps
    Upstream:
    910 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    6.1 dB / 5.4 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    29.4 dB / 16.4 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    14544 / 12749
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    14 / 15584
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    72 / 252647
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    10 / 36449
    What is causing this poor quality in connection and what can be done to rectify the problem?
    Thank you for your response in advanced.
    Regards,
    Richard.

    Thank you for you quick reply, I have just moved my hub to the master socket again and re-run the test and I seem to be getting the same results.
    ADSL Line Status
    Connection Information
    Line state:
    Connected
    Connection time:
    0 days, 00:17:47
    Downstream:
    12.96 Mbps
    Upstream:
    910 Kbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI:
    0/38
    Type:
    PPPoA
    Modulation:
    G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type:
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up):
    6.0 dB / 5.2 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up):
    28.7 dB / 15.9 dB
    Output power (Down/Up):
    20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up):
    26417 / 5
    CRC Events (Down/Up):
    1 / 303
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
    0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up):
    31 / 11
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
    10 / 36522
    I have also checked if the bell wire was attached and it is not. My socket is of the new type with the inclusion of an inductor on the faceplate. My ADSL filters and modem cable already have the middle connecting pins removed so I don’t think it is a wiring problem, at least in my apartment anyway. I have also searched for problems with the exchange and they are showing green for my area. (Liverpool Central)
    I have just rang the quiet line and I do not appear to have any noise on the line. However, all I have is a cordless phone and I know that is not ideal for determining noise due to the radio frequency interfering with the phone speaker.
    Again thank you for you time on this issue.
    Regards,
    Richard

  • Traceroute timeouts and lots of packet loss when a...

    I host various site via the above, and since late last night and today, I am having connection timeout issues on all of them (but sites like bbc, bt etc are fine). I contacted them and performed a traceroute to my default site southee.co.uk which timed out. Below are the results:
    traceroute to southee.co.uk (37.61.236.12), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
    1 bthomehub (192.168.1.254) 2.733 ms 2.414 ms 2.415 ms
    2 esr5.manchester5.broadband.bt.net (217.47.67.144) 72.412 ms 29.705 ms 131.735 ms
    3 217.47.67.13 (217.47.67.13) 31.390 ms 29.680 ms 103.936 ms
    4 213.1.69.226 (213.1.69.226) 41.172 ms 32.700 ms 129.323 ms
    5 31.55.165.103 (31.55.165.103) 30.791 ms 31.639 ms 130.306 ms
    6 213.120.162.69 (213.120.162.69) 31.248 ms 59.138 ms 30.657 ms
    7 31.55.165.109 (31.55.165.109) 32.159 ms 31.507 ms 31.513 ms
    8 acc2-10gige-9-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net (109.159.250.228) 31.499 ms 31.325 ms
    acc2-10gige-0-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net (109.159.250.194) 31.197 ms
    9 core2-te0-12-0-1.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.250.147) 41.744 ms
    core2-te0-13-0-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.250.139) 41.346 ms
    core2-te0-5-0-1.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.250.145) 41.744 ms
    10 peer1-xe3-3-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.254.211) 39.527 ms
    peer1-xe10-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.254.122) 38.791 ms 38.910 ms
    11 te2-3.sov-edge1.uk.timico.net (195.66.224.111) 54.032 ms 37.941 ms 38.642 ms
    12 78-25-201-30.static.dsl.as8607.net (78.25.201.30) 45.830 ms 46.413 ms 42.448 ms
    13 * * *
     They then performed a traceroute from the server and got the following, again with timeouts and packet loss. See below:
    1. 37.61.236.1 0.0% 10 0.5 0.7 0.4 2.9 0.8
    2. ae0-2061.ndc-core1.uk.timico 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.1
    3. te2-3.sov-edge1.uk.timico.ne 0.0% 10 10.5 9.7 4.2 30.2 8.7
    4. linx1.ukcore.bt.net 0.0% 10 4.1 4.3 4.1 5.9 0.6
    5. host213-121-193-153.ukcore.b 0.0% 10 5.5 8.0 4.9 12.7 2.3
    6. acc2-10GigE-4-3-1.mr.21cn-ip 0.0% 10 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.6 0.1
    7. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    8. 31.55.165.108 0.0% 10 12.1 12.1 11.8 12.4 0.2
    9. 213.120.162.68 0.0% 10 12.0 12.1 12.0 12.3 0.1
    10. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
     I've just spent a fustrating 15 minutes with Bt Support chat who just seemed want to pass me on to the BT Business team, so I thought I'd post here, for a more informed response.

    Hi Jane, Thanks for the reply. I have now purchased an AEBS(n) to try to overcome this problem. The Apple site says it is compatible with all versions of Airport card so I thought it would solve the problem. My new problem is to be found here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1087292&tstart=0
    However to answer your questions, The OS is 10.4.10 and I have run every updater I can find for all Macs concerned. hope this helps.

  • Bouts of packet loss and complete loss of connection

    Ok forum, I give up! I need your help.
    I have an E1200 and am time out and packet loss issues. The internet connection is fine for 30 seconds to five minuets and then everything times out for 15-20 seconds. Although it’s only a minor incontinence to web browsing, it makes playing games and watching videos a nightmare. “Lost connection to server error.” and the like…
    This is what I have done to remedy the problem.
    I upgraded to a new router, the e1200 I am currently using, from my Tenda 10/100 N. The problems where the same that I am experience currently and the reason I bought it in the firs place.
    When I directly connect to the cable modem, I have no issues and everything is fine.
    I have run a trace route and the second hop, (the router to the modem) is the choke point.
    I have cloned the MAC address
    I have updated the firmware and hard reset
    I have throttled my MTU to automatic, 1500, and 1472. None making any difference.
    I have disabled NAT and all that does is kill my internet connection
    I have disabled all firewalls router and windows, no change.
    I replaced the physical wire from the router to the modem.
    I have disconnected all devices except one computer, and no difference.
    I ran a DNS trace and I have… non routable local internet address 192.168.1.1
    DNS-cac-lb-01.rr.com and DNS-cac-lb-02.rr.com
    I am using windows 7 and my ISP is time Warner so-cal. Help me obiwan, you’re my only hope.

    Sorry friend. I have not had the gaul to load the 1.0 firmware. I am 99% sure I have the 2.0 hardware. I did however unplug my modem for an hour and then try and reconnect. The result was a lossless environment for fifteen to twenty minuets (a long time for me.). But, I am right back still having the same problem. A friend gave me a new netgear router, I am going to try that and I am going to go to Timewarner and have them replace my modem just to make sure there is nothing wrong with the surfboard. I will report back with my findings.

  • Packet loss higher than 100% in SQL Reporting

    One of our customers is having network problems and packet loss in their network - according to Lync. The network guys claim these values are unrealistic and there've been no dropped packets on their WAN network.
    On the other side, I'm looking at a Call Details Report from Lync SQL Reporting and see this in the gateway leg information:
    Audio Stream (Caller -> Callee)
    Codec:
    PCMU
    Sample rate:
    8000
    Packet utilization:
    285
    Avg. packet loss rate:
    51.20%
    Max. packet loss rate:
    79.52%
    Avg. jitter:
    0 ms
    Max. jitter:
    0 ms
    Burst duration:
    5980 ms
    Burst gap duration:
    1890 ms
    Burst density:
    100.00%
    Burst gap density:
    0.00%
    Avg. concealed samples ratio:
    60.00%
    Avg. stretched samples ratio:
    0.00%
    Avg. compressed samples ratio:
    0.00%
    Avg. network MOS:
    1.50
    Min. network MOS:
    1.50
    Avg. network MOS degradation:
    2.21
    Max. network MOS degradation:
    2.21
    NMOS degradation (jitter):
    0.00%
    NMOS degradation (packet loss):
    100.00%
    Audio Stream (Callee -> Caller)
    Codec:
    PCMU
    Sample rate:
    8000
    Audio FEC:
    False
    Bandwidth estimates:
    Packet utilization:
    146
    Avg. packet loss rate:
    900.00%
    Max. packet loss rate:
    900.00%
    Avg. jitter:
    1540 ms
    Max. jitter:
    4406 ms
    Avg. round trip:
    178 ms
    Max. round trip:
    179 ms
    From this I feel there are things to troubleshoot. :-) but how come that Lync reports a 900% packet loss?
    I thought that a 100% packet loss was everything... can someone tell me what exactly are these 100+ percentages?
    Thanks in advance.

    latest patch level :) are you not seeing these values in your Server Performance reports?
    The other thing that bugs me is when you have 1 call for 1 second with "900% loss", that would average down to get red values in the summary columns for the other 100 calls as well, as the calls are not counted for seconds, but just piece by piece.
    So 8 perfect calls to this one above would average "100% packet loss per call" in the summary, which is just unusable...

Maybe you are looking for

  • Berechnen in LiveCycle Designer ES2

    Hallo, ich wollte mich aml etwas mit dem Thema PDF Formular und LiveCycle Designer beschäftigen. Ich habe ein Formular erstellt mit ein paar Felder und noch eine Tabelle dazu. In der Tabelle würde ich gerne ein paar Zwischensummen berechnune und spät

  • Songs in my library but not on my ipod?

    I've 2,600 songs in my itunes library but only 2,100 or so on my ipod. I've updated the ipod and can actually work out what many of the missing songs are. They were all uploaded from cd to the library and play ok from the library. I've tried the sear

  • Server stating client not connected even though it is on

    We often have trouble where the server will state the computer is not connected even though it is on. Sometimes restarting the local service will cause the server to see it connected again. Most time we need to reboot the machine altogether. Is there

  • Navigation bar not displaying current site

    sometimes it shows the current site address, sometimes it just says enter an address as if you just opened a new tab.

  • Recieving emails all the text is Helvetica Fractions

    I am getting a lot of emails coming in that are unreadable because all the text is Helvetica Fractions. My presets are all Arial so I can not understand why this happens. When I check mail from a PC it looks fine, only from my MAC Please advise. Than