Cumulate cost at header in sales BOM

Need to cumulate cost (roll up) to Header. The invoice will contain header as well components,. however the component costs should rollup to header.
the co-pa will have cost passed only at header.
Please suggest me suitabel Exits/BADI/Spots...........
Regards
Ricky

Thanks

Similar Messages

Can sales bom contain sales bom?

Hi,
   Can any tell me in SAP standard can one sales bom's item is another sales bom's header? For example, material code " A" is the header of sales bom, it has 3 component materials: A1, A2,A3. If A3 is another sales bom's header, it has 2 components:B1, B2. Can this suppose support in SAP ?
   When i entry material code "A" in sales order, will it bring out A1,A2,A3, B1,B2 ?
   Thanks in advance!
Edited by: Irene Shen on Apr 2, 2008 11:05 AM

Hi Shen,
         I think you can get your requirement through Multilevel BOM concept.
Here Iam giving the link about multilevel BOM go through this it may help you.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/7e/cb7f2f43a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali.

Sales BOM distribute header cost to the subitems in the invoice

Hi all,
I have next BOM scenario in the invoice:
Header Item Sales Price: 0 Cost: 20
Subitem 1 Sales Price: 20 Cost: 0
Subitem 2 Sales Price: 20 Cost: 0
I can't move up the Sales Price of the subitems, because they are relevant for the pricing and the invoice.
I'd like to distribute the cost of the header item to their subitems.
It's possible? Perhaps with a routine in the copy control or an alternative calculation type in the Princing Procedure?
What I'd like to get is:
Header Item Sales Price: 0 Cost: 0
Subitem 1 Sales Price: 20 Cost: 10
Subitem 2 Sales Price: 20 Cost: 10
Thanks in advance

You can use T.code: COOIS if Product Costing has been configured for MTO scenario whcih gives the costing details.
You can also use To.code: KE30 if CO-PA implemented.
but if you want to link with billing, Please search for any reports in Sales information system.
One more you can create a ABAP Query Report using T.code: SQVI
Regards,
Anbu

Sales BOM : Header item stock and cost

Hello gurus,
I'm very new for sales BOM and have one questions.
We have material A and B (purchased from vendor).
They will be assembled by 3PL company as C.
Then we will sell C to the our customer.
I want to set price/cost at the header item level.
because we will sell material B free of charge.
I've set C like below
1. Item category group. : ERLA
   Item category : TAQ
   Setting of A and B
    Item category group. : NORM
   Item category : TAE
2. Then make BOM in tcode CS01 with C
    Material : C
    Plant: XXXX
    BOM Usage :5
    subitem : A, B
    Item category : N(Non-stock item)
After then I tried to make a sales order
with material C.
I can get sub-items(A,B) successfully
however system said there is no atp stock for C.
How can I get stock of C from stock of A and B?
And How can I set the cost of C with value of A+B?
And How can I set the condition of C to calculate cost of C in header level?
or can I set like
price is determined in header level and cost is calculated in item level?
Or please recommend nicer solution.
Thank you very much.
J.K.

Hi Azam,
It seems to me that you want to use Delivery Group for Sales BOM where If Mat A = Mat B + Mat C and Mat B Availability date is 20/07/2014 (DD/MM/YYYY) and Mat C availability is 25/07/2014 then Main line item should be confirmed with 25/07/2014.
If any one sub Item is not available, then Any of the item from the Grouping should not be dispatched.
If this is the requirement then, In Item Category (VOV7) for main Item update Create Delivery Group field with X and your requirement will be fulfilled.
Do let us know the result after testing.
Regards,
MJ.

Cost of Sales BOM

Hi SD Gurus,
Need to know how to calculate the cost of the sales BOM that I have created. When I create a sales order for the sales BOM, it explode all the components in the sales BOM. All of them have condition type VPRS which state the cost of the component but the actual FGD sales BOM does not have VPRS condition type in them. The item category for the sales BOM is customised as ZTAI, Banded without pricing.
I tried looking at the header and there is a VPRS conditon but it is for the whole order. The order may or may not include other sales order item that is a Sales BOM.
Am i missing something here. Pls help and points will be awarded. Thanks

Hi all SD Gurus,
Thank you very much for the fast response.
I think my SD config person did not check the "determine cost" in VOV7 for that item category. Will ask him to do so but am interested in the below suggestion also.
at parent level, in which case all the sub-items pricing components are collated (totaled) into the parent item.
Dear Kookie,
Can you advise how to perform the above also from a cost perspective, i.e. adding all the VPRS found in the sub items and adding them to the main item

Sales BOM and related to cost

Dear All,
Our client has requirement of sales package as below:
1. They want sell sales BOM as sales package
2. Material A is main item, and material B, C, and D as component
3. They sell material A and want the revenue also cost post to material A
My colleague said already set up the config sales BOM, and the result are:
Revenue post to material A (father/main item)
Cost post to material b, c, and d.
However our client need all cost moved to main item (material A)
How's the behaviour of sales bom exactly? Especially the costing?
And what must we do to cover the requirement.
Regards,
Dewi

Hi,
Go to VTFL --- > Select the document type --> Go to item level and tick the cumulate the cost.
Cumulate cost
This field is used in the main item to control whether the cost value (usually condition type VPRS) is to be copied from the relevant sub-items. The following cases are taken into account:
Free of charge sub-items (free goods)
Batch split items
Bill of material components
This function is needed especially if the sub-items involved are not relevant for billing. In this case the costs of these sub-items do not appear in CO-PA or the statistics
Hope this will resolve your issue.
REgards,
Krishna O.

CU50 difference in Engineering BOM cost and Sales BOM cost

Dear All,
I have material BOM    M0001 --configurable...finished prodcuct (spe procuremt 52)
                                             M2100-- confifurable --- Phontam (semi finished)
                                                       M8600---- configurable (semifinished) specP 52                                                       R7000---
                                                       R7000--non configurable material
                                                       R7000--non configurable
                                                       R7000-- non configurable.
Now in T-code Cu50 under configuration tab simulation
1. when i am selecting Engineering Tab and then costing tab   all materials are picked for Engineering BOM costing.
2. when i am selecting only costing tab (Sales).. then the material R7000--non configurable qty 54
                                                                                R7000--non configurable qty 27
                                                                                R7000-- non configurable. qty 18
are not costed.
What could be the reason for not picking the cost for the material R7000
                                                                                R7000
                                                                                R7000
Please help me..
Thanks in advance.
regards
janardhan

Hello Janardhan,
This is standard SAP behaviour. As per details given by you, it seems that material's consfiguration profile have settings of "Order BOM" and "multi-level" in CU43 transaction. So for such settings, system behaves differently for Engineering BOM and sales order cost estimates as given below.
1. Click on u201CEngineeringu201D Button and then click on u201CCalculationu201D Button : System simulates the cost estimates through transaction CU51. And in CU51 BOM explosion for cost estimate is multilevel. So system will show all the components in the BOM of header material. So you will find all the components listed in Cost estimate simulation.
2. Directly click on u201CCalculationu201D button : System simulates the cost estimates as it use to simulate in VA01 transaction. Becasue of this, there is NO BOM explosion till last level. System will only simulate the Cost estimate by exploding the BOM till 1st level. So system will show only 1st level BOM components. So you will find only 1st level BOM components listed.
So dont try to check anything in it, as its standard SAP behaviour.
Regards,
Nachiket.

Sales BOM Header line item confirmed without components in Delivery

Hi Experts,
The issue is about the delivery is created with the single component for the Sales BOM where as it contains two.
We have analyzed the issue and checked that the missing component would have not been available in the stock during the time when the delivery is created and hence is not included(Header material and single component is included in the Delivery).
The user's concern is; when there is no stock for any one of the component, then it shouldn't have confirmed the header material. Kindly suggest.

Hi Azam,
It seems to me that you want to use Delivery Group for Sales BOM where If Mat A = Mat B + Mat C and Mat B Availability date is 20/07/2014 (DD/MM/YYYY) and Mat C availability is 25/07/2014 then Main line item should be confirmed with 25/07/2014.
If any one sub Item is not available, then Any of the item from the Grouping should not be dispatched.
If this is the requirement then, In Item Category (VOV7) for main Item update Create Delivery Group field with X and your requirement will be fulfilled.
Do let us know the result after testing.
Regards,
MJ.

At the time of VF01 only header item is coming in case of Sales BOM

Dear Experts,
I have created Sales BOM with LUMF item category, now i have created Sales order where Header level material Item Category is TAQ & sub item category is TAE, Price is at header level only all sub item are free. Now when i am doing VF01 only header material is coming but i want all sub item should come in VF01 & also print the same on commerical & excise invoice.
Could any body help me?
Thanks
Jyotsna

HI,
In VOV7 for TAE item catogory select billing indicator as delivery relevent billing.
Suresh

Sales BOM Header Material should not come in J1IJ or delivery

Hi,
We have one depot plant, Now i am using the sales BOM, I have created one Material header with item category LUFM pricing at item level only, BOM is created, When I am entering the Header material in SO then alll child items are coming, then while creating the delivery all the child items and also the header items is coming in the delivery but same is coming in the J1IJ also I want that the header materal should not come in the J1IJ and it will be better if it is not in delivery if i set the indicator delivery block for header materia in SO then that item si not coming in Delivery but SO is shoing in Open SO as the header material is not delivered.
So is there any setting for this.
Also in quotaion I have maintain the item category assignment I have assign QT - LUFM - AGN
but whhen I am entering the header material in VA21 Ffor which the item category is LUFM system is giving the error message
No item category available (Table T184 QT LUMF )
regards,
zafar
Edited by: zafar karnalkar on Nov 24, 2011 7:56 AM

Hi,
Yes I want that the Header material should not come in J1IJ only. but i check the program of J1IJ it is selecting all the materials ref. to delivery number without any further check. also is it possible insted of SO if first we create the quotation in quotation therr willl be header material as well as child item but in SO only child item should get copy when creating ref. to that quotaion, I try with item category copy control, but then system is selecting non of the materils from Quotaion to SO, and when I allowed coopy control of header material from Quotaion to SO then it is copying Header as well as child items in the SO.
regards,
zafar
Edited by: zafar karnalkar on Nov 24, 2011 10:53 AM

Wrong Availability check for Header Item in Sales BOM after BOP

Hi Guys
I am stuck with a very weird problem. Request your advice:
I have a Sales BOM with one item Lets header is 'A' and Item 'B'. On creation of Sales Order ATP check is performed and both the line items (with A and B) the committed qty and committed date.
Now when BOP runs, it deletes the allocation of A and changes it to '0'
Details:
'A' is a non stockable product
Req:
1. I am not sure whether I should include A in BOP selection, however even running it only with B it deletes the allocation of A and the committed qty changes to '0'
Can you please suggest the solution or standard way of running BOP for Sales BOM
Thanks in advance
-Rahul

Thanks for writing in Prasun
Yes I created a new Filter type however when you add a STO category and then you change the fields to include item category you will get the same error. I am also in V 5.0 of SCM
Normally we use SAP_NetChange filter type. So is it possible to restrict using item category for this filter some how!
On the otherhand I also wonder these should not ATP relevant as the header item is non stockable item! And I guess there should some catch to exclude if not item category as you mentioned!
So the order categories included are:
Customer Inquiry
Customer quotation
Sales Order
SD Scheduling Agreement
SD Scheduling agreement w/external
Contract
Delivery w/io charge
Independent requriement
Release from customer in plant
STO
Deplyometn release
TLB release for purc ord
Fields
Product
location
distribution centrer
MRP area
product Hierarchy
Location hierarchy
supplier location
These are std filter type and I cant be modified.. however we restrict our filter to location only!
Kindly advice!
Thanks in advance
-RK

Header Item of Sales BOM is not copied into second delivery

Hi Gurus
I have an issue to be solved immediately. Please help me to fix this.
I have a Sales BOM in order with components exploded (The Header Item has 5 Components). The pricing is maintained at header level. The order is created with a quantity of 5.
Schedule lines in the order show that quantity of 3 is available immediately and another 2 are available in another one week.
Due to availability of material/confirmed quantity, first outbound delivery is created (VL01N) with reference to the order for a quantity of 3. In the delivery, Picking & PGI was done for this delivery.
My issue is: When I go to create the second outbound delivery with reference to the above same order, for the remaining quantity of 2, I can see 5 components displayed, BUT NOT THE HEADER ITEM IN THE DELIVERY. My client wants to see the header item as well in the delivery as it is sent to freight carrier.
Please guide me to fix this.
Thanks in advance.

But you have already delivered the header item Let's say your header item is number 10 and your increment is 10. Create item 11 with the header material and delete the exploded BOM. Now you have a new header item to deliver with the remaining 2 pieces of your BOM materials.

Alternate BOM in Sales BOm Costing

Hi,
When we create sales order with alternate sales BOM we face a problem.I am using Alternate BOM 5 in sales order .But Costing is happening for Alternate BOM 1.By default Costing is taking Alternate BOM1 irrespective of alternate BOM i am using in sales order.
At the time of sales BOM costing system should take alternate BOM5 .how to do this?
Regards,
Guru
Edited by: kumaraguru v on Jan 22, 2010 7:24 AM

You can use Mixed Costing for this. Maintain Procurement alternative by CK91 & Mixing Ratio CK94 for the version you want to cost
Regards
Hardy

3rd Part Dropship Scenario with Sales BOM

Hi
We have a 3rd Party Dropshipment scenario with Sales BOM with susequent Debit
Characteristics of Sales BOM
Sales BOM is created
Header Material is Valuated but non-inventorised (Accounting and costing view should exist)
Component Material is Valuated and inventorised
In Sales order, Pricing is done at the header material not at the components level
During Billing we get the COGS for the header material (cost coming from VPRS)
No VPRS exist at component level instead we have copy of VPRS just to capture the value in COPA for our reporting
Process
1. Sales Order created with Sales BOM exploded in sales order.
2. At the Item level Purchase requisition is created.
3. PR for the components is converted to PO
4. Vendor Delivers the components to Customer.
5. Statistical GR done in our system.
6. Invoicing is done in MIRO
7. We directly do the Billing. Billing is created at header level. Revenue and COGS is reported at Header level only.
We are stuck when we are doing the Subsequent Debit (can be for any unplanned cost). For Susequent Debit we are not able to report differential COPA at header level.
Normally whenever you do subsequent debit in case of 3rd party dropship for normal material, COPA document automatically attached to Billing. This is happening because of the behaviour of VPRS condition type. In our case VPRS only exists at header level and not at component level but replenishment is for components. Subsequent debit is also happening at component level. We need it to be reported at header level.
We need some solution to this.
Please advise
Regards
Neeraj
Edited by: NEERAJ BHARDWAJ on Dec 2, 2011 5:12 AM

Hi Raj,
Please clarified your requirement here, you mention that you wanted to valuated COGS at actual cost of PO? That sound more like actual costing here and what is the reason for this requirement?
Is this MTO with variant configuration?
If this is MTO with VC, Yes - we do cost Sales Order and here is the brief steps:-
Price Control S
a) Sales Order Creation - Normally when you save this will be costed and marked automatically. Note that condition type EK02 will represent the cost here
b) Run MRP based on Sales Order requirement which resulting planned orders, PR, etc
c) Convert PR-PO, Planned Order -> Production Order
d) Confirmations, GR on PO which valuated according to the SCE Costing in step a)
e) PGI will be based on the GR value on step d) which is also your SCE Costing
f) Any variance between PO and SCE need to be settle.
Thanks,
Ong Yang Lim

Use of Sales BOM to force ATP against Bulk Material?

Background:
Our business was recently acquired, and we have migrated to the parent company's R/3 system. In our previous MRP system (R/2), we planned, produced, and shipped a single bulk Material ID in Trucks, Rail Cars, Flexi-Bags, and Iso-Tainers. In the new system, specific Material IDs are now required for each of these modes. However, we do not store the inventory in these modes, nor do we wish to plan at this detailed level.
Considered So Far:
Initial suggestion was to use A.T.O. to look through a BOM and automatically create production orders for each customer order. However, this seems to add additional complexity that we do not really need, and makes changing order dates more challenging (have to move both the order and the accompanying Prod. Order).
Desired Outcome:
Order is entered and priced based upon the mode-specific Material ID, but inventory is relieved from the Bulk material. In our previous R/2 system, there was a field on the material master called "Std.Prod." which stood for Standard Product Link. We used it for synonymous products where we produced and inventoried under one name, but sold under several different names. The customer materials were set up as type SALE and referenced the inventoried material, set as type FINI, in this Std. Prod. field. Thus, at the header level, the user saw the SALE material, but for planning and at the batch level, the system showed the FINI.
Options?
I am told that, due to the amount of custom coding and user exits surrounding outputs and interfaces to EDI and other external systems, the use of Material Determination would require too much testing and potentially too much development work. But, is it the best / correct solution to the problem? Because right now, I don't have the ability to perform ATP against the inventoried Material, so nothing confirms. Would the use of a 1 to 1 Sales BOM offer anything different?
Many Thanks in Advance,
J.P.

Hello JP
Material Determination (MD) works with Consignment orders, only you need to assign a MD procedure to the requisite sales document type in config ( TO code OV14). Product substitution, which is a specialized form of MD, makes use of special item cats like TAX and TAPS or TAPA and TAN for main and substitute items respectively, but you can always make copies of them and use them with consignment orders also in conjunction with item category usages like PSHP. PSEL, PSA1 and PSA2. There could be resultant issues, but unless you test you won't know them all.
Your second question about 'Sale would go against the finished good (Truck / Rail material) while the production costs go against the Bulk', brought a new realization in me. You are ordering, pricing and delivering Truck or Rail materials, but those requirements have to be converted to Production orders for bulk material, so from a Sales and Distribution (SD) point of view you don't need anything extra, therefore work with you Production Planning (PP) consultant to convert the requirements at PP end?? May be without resorting to MD or BOMs in Sales, you can work with your PP consultant and with standard config or custom development, you may realize your desired outcome.
Also as long as cost is maintained in the sales Material (Truck for example) with due regard to the additional costs in converting Bulk to truck, you should be fine. Follow the example below:
Standard cost of 1 ton , say X, is stored in Bulk Material master.
Now if there is no additional cost and you just load the bulk material into a truck and if a Truck is 10 ton, then Truck material would have 10X in its material master for cost.
But if there is some other material and/or labor involved in converting bulk to Truck and their cost is y, then you will have (10x+y) in your truck material. Also it is worthwhile to capture the additional cost in the Production/Assembly order via components and operations.
Your problem is not insurmountable, but you need to assemble a team of SD. PP, MM and CO experts to design an integrated solution for you.

Cumulate cost at header in sales BOM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for