Cumulative Qty Received by Customer wrongly updated in Scheduling Agreement

Hi All,
I face a strange issue in Schedule Agreement[Forecast Delivery Schedule].
The exact scenario is as follows:
1)On 17/09/09, I saw a CmlQtyReceived of '249'.
2)On 19/09/09, this value got changed to '141'
3)On 23/09/09, this value again got changed to '249'
I was not able to identify the reason for the '141' Qty getting displayed on 19th. Even if I go to Analysis now, there is no Forecast Delivery Schedule with '141' Qty to support the display.
Do let me know the issue in this.
Needless to say points will be awarded for helpful replies.
Regards,
Raj Kumar Reddy.

Hello;
I researched about this issue and I would like to recommend you to check the FAQ note about the most critical problems with Scheduling Agreements, note 923104.
As stated in question 2 (or also 3), you can check and correct the cumulative quantityes using Report SDLIPL01. Regarding this report, please refer to note 923105.
In addition, I kindly ask you to please check notes 922638 and 922639 about more details regarding the cumulative quantities.
Also, read the follow notes related to fiscal year changes:
      336670    Avoid the fiscal year change (introduction)
      332971    Avoid the fiscal year change (coding)
Well, I hope those documentation can help you a lot.
Regards
Ruy Castro

Similar Messages

Price update in Scheduling Agreement

Dear Gurus,
I am seeking valuable suggestions reg the price update in scheduling agreement.
I am aware of the fact the the same can be done in the below mentioned ways-
1) Manually
2) Through condition records
I would be seeking the best possible option to the update the price in scheduling agreements, options would be
1) Manually @ item level
2) Changing condition records ( VK12) with same validity period
3) Changing condition records ( Vk12) with new validity period ( closing the old validity period)
This is because to avoid any inconsistency in the future.
Regards,
Ajit

Dear Ajit,
1.Manual entry -
Manual entry will be applicable in only some cases and you cant able to track if some one has changed the price and it is having limitation .
2.through condition records-
where as if you maintain the price through the access sequence and user cant able to change the price manually and for different combination and different material you can maintain different prices .here there is no limitation and you can extend this price for different combination in future .
Based on the above points you take decision.
Regards,
C.B Reddy

How to update Purchase Schedule agreement

Hi Experts,
Please tell me the ,is there any Function Module/BAPI which updates Purchase Schedule Agreement(Transaction Code ME38) in SAP???
Thanks..
Debi.

Hi,
Please check this BAPI BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Configuration needed to set up a customer to use a scheduling agreement

We need to set up a new customer to use a scheduling agreement . We need to know what is the conifguration needed to do this. Is there config that has to be set up for the customer say in the customer master to allow this. Is there also config that needs to be set up in the plant or shipping point.

Hi Frank,
Please go through this.
Spro --> img --> sales and distribution --> Basic Settings --> Partner Determination --> Set-up Partner Determination --> Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header
Select "Partner Determination Procedure" as "DS - Scheduling Agreement"
Once selected, mantain appropriate settings in following (from Left-hand side)
Partner Determination Procedure Assignment (Sales Doc --> Partner determination Procedure).
Hope this helps you.
Kanna.

Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
Thanks

Hi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B

Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement

Hi Gurus,
Can you please advise on the below issue..
Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1) Create Delivery order (Order Type : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
Advance thanks for your valid points.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Hi Ram,
Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
Best regards,
Venkat.

Auto update of Schedule Agreements

Once a schedule agreement has been created will MRP auto update the delivery date (for JIT) if the lead time is zero days and the new need date is today?

You need to check what is the procedure (T-Code) from which the data gets updated into these tables.
For example
when we craete a material from MM01 the data gets updated in the corresponding table i.e. EKPO.
In same way you need to find the process and then you can use BTE (Busineess transaction events) for that process. BTE are only for FI module and these tables are also related to FI .

Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement

Dear Experts,
We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
Regards,
Soumick

Hi,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
Solution
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Regards,
Udaya.

Customer fiscal year in scheduling agreement

hi SD experts,
i meet a problem as below,
Cumulative issued quantity in SA can not cumulate the previous year's quantity, i have checked the delivery schedule header data and find that Customer fiscal year and customer previouse year (Customer fiscal year which is not yet closed) are the same,
how can i change the customer previous year?
thanks in advance,
happygj

UP!!!! Please help.

Receive against an ASN referencing a Scheduling Agreement (SA)

Hello,
We would like to start using RF directly in SAP (lm00,lm01 etcu2026), we currently perform this outside of the system and feed into it. We would like to receive product from our supplier against an ASN referencing an SA. Can anyone give me some instruction on how to do this? And will it show the details of the ASN on the scanners?
Looking forward to your responses.....
Thank-you
Mario

Hi,
You can see the ASN details on the scanner. You can scan the information that needs to be recorded, such as handling unit (HU) numbers, using a bar code, and also scan the bar code to verify the storage bins
Since the RF solution is an integral part of the standard SAP System, you can access the RF transactions either directly through the SAP menu or from mobile data-entry devices
Generated information is immediately available to the SAP database instantly
Generally to use RF have to set the indicators in MM01 Transaction in WM view. Gist of steps in RF ar eas follows...
Create PO, Create inbound delivery, create and confirm TO using RF screen, select delivery and do PGI. Later can see the document flow. You can run the same scenario with ASN also.I hope this will give clarity to you. Thanking you.

Scheduling agreements / ***.Qty.

Hello
We are working on doing EDI scheduling agreements with a customer.
The thing is that they can not send us a ***.Qty.received in the EDI message.
What they do send is the "last delivery" received and the last despatch qty and my question is if SAP based on that information can calculate the correct open qty ?
Thanks in advance.
Alex

Hi Alex,
Whenever customer sends an inbound EDI 830 IDOC it will update the Scheduling agreement with relevant details.
"*** Qty Received" by customer will be sent in Segment: E1EDP10 and Field: AKUEM
"Last Dely" details will be sent in Segment: E1EDP10 and Field: BELNR
Coming to point 1: "*** Qty Received" is always sent by the customer. If they dont send this info then system will show up huge quantities piled up in the "Qty in Transit" field. This again will block your Open Qty.
Point no 2: Last Dely always refers to the delivery no that is received by the customer. This need not necessarily be the one in SAP. It can be customer's own last delivery no. This field is not mandatory. Being optional, system will even then calculate the Open Qty without any issues.
Hope this will help you out !
Regards,
Syed Nasir

Cumulative Quantities in Scheduling Agreement

Hi All
Can anyone tell me how this works with *** quantites, we have always ran from receipts. However, if we choose inbound deliveries does that mean when we send releases the YTd receipt + open Inbound deliveries will be sent as the YTD *** values to our vendor.
Our company is looking for something with intransit values as part of our cums. How does this affect our *** requirements if this is changed?
Regards,
Krisjohn

I'm new to 862 (Shipping Schedule) iDocs and I'm having a problem with the dates/quantities during the update processing. We are receiving an inbound 862 and we run the transaction BD87 to update a Scheduling Agreement. BD87 processes without any errors. When we check the Scheduling Agreement, we expect the Forecast Delivery Schedule dates/quantities to be updated, but the JIT Delivery Schedule dates/quantities are being updated instead. How do I determine which dates/quantities are to be updated with my inbound data?
Any assistance is greatly appreciated!

Problem While Uploading Customer Requirements To Scheduling Agreement

Hi
I have received a ticket from client which is as below .
As itu2019s new issue for me , I am not able to fix the issue . It goes like this u2026u2026.
Customer scheduling agreement. 30000000
Part 300.F
The customer 862u2019s have been coming in during the mid morning hours (8or 8:30AM)
The customer 830u2019s and 862u2019s arrive once a week, on Fridays. 862 adds 5 addition firm order onto the end of the remaining firm orders.
This is what happened this morning.
7AM, VL10A due to ship today correctly shows 425pc.
7AM we created todays delivery for 425pc. Delivery 80005515. this removed the 425 from the open quantity on the scheduling agreement.
After the delivery was created for todayu2019s shipment, the new 862u2019s arrived, from customer , and populated the scheduling agreement.
Todayu2019s shipment was PGIed.
The scheduling agreement below shows 425pc due to ship today after we made todayu2019s shipment.
The problem seems to happen when todayu2019s delivery is already set up and THEN the new 862u2019s arrive and populates the scheduling agreement.
Is there any way of resolving this issue?
We know that the customer scheduling agreement is set up differently to receive 862u2019s.
This customer adds new firm orders each Friday.
So , could I request you to help me out in this case where I have to check up and how can I fix the issue .
Thanks in advance .

Hi Friends
Could I request you to help me out on this aspect
Thanks

Updating scheduling agreements in SD via IDOC delins.delfor02 / splitting

Dear All,
I am having the following problem:
I am getting an EDI 862, which should update an scheduling agreement in SAP on the SD site.
The incoming file contains the relevant information for multiple line items and for mulitiple release numbers as well as the information for the forecast and the JIT.
Based on SAP standard documentation, an IDOC will be only processed if it's containing a single E1EDP10 segment, means in my understanding information for exactly one line item,for exactly one relase number and either the forecast information or the JIT information.
Due to this I need to split the IDOC into several ones, to be able to use the SAP standard process here.
It looks like that the splitting is not posssible in XI, which we are using as our middleware. Does anybody can tell me, how to split an incoming IDOC into several ones and to have them saved in the database, so that each IDOC can have it's own status etc.
I already tried to go away from standard and to use fm sd_salesdocument_ change instead, which is having all the relevant table structures, but finally it was not helpful, because we have not been able to execute changes to the recent release number.
Thanks for your help.
Marita

Dear All,
I am having the following problem:
I am getting an EDI 862, which should update an scheduling agreement in SAP on the SD site.
The incoming file contains the relevant information for multiple line items and for mulitiple release numbers as well as the information for the forecast and the JIT.
Based on SAP standard documentation, an IDOC will be only processed if it's containing a single E1EDP10 segment, means in my understanding information for exactly one line item,for exactly one relase number and either the forecast information or the JIT information.
Due to this I need to split the IDOC into several ones, to be able to use the SAP standard process here.
It looks like that the splitting is not posssible in XI, which we are using as our middleware. Does anybody can tell me, how to split an incoming IDOC into several ones and to have them saved in the database, so that each IDOC can have it's own status etc.
I already tried to go away from standard and to use fm sd_salesdocument_ change instead, which is having all the relevant table structures, but finally it was not helpful, because we have not been able to execute changes to the recent release number.
Thanks for your help.
Marita

FM to update schedule agreement pricing

Is there a BAPI or FM that I can use to update a schedule agreement in 4.7? BAPI_PO_CHANGE gives me an error saying it does not work for schedule agreements.
Thanks,
Matt

Hi Matt,
I am not sure of the exact function module; but BDC is not just next to direct table update. It plays an important role when it comes to the integrity of the data. In BDC, we are calling the transaction, which performs all the necessary checks(Such as the permitted values of a particular field, Foreignkey relation ship check etc etc) on data base table before performing the data base update. This is very crucial, since the direct table update will never check these kinds of checks on the table, and there is a possibility of updating the table with undesired values. So, it is always a better option to go for BDC, whenever possible, than a direct table update.
Regards,
Shiny Paul

Cumulative Qty Received by Customer wrongly updated in Scheduling Agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for