CUP 5.3 SP9 Forwarded requests not moving to next stage

CUP 5.3 sp9 - The administrator forwarded a request (first stage mgr approval) to another person (the forward return box was checked).  The person that the request was forwarded to got the message (no content in the email, just a link) and was able to approve.  The original person also got an email with a link, and was able to see that the request was approved.
The request is stuck in the mgr approval stage, it did not move out of the original person's inbox. the audit trail is below:
1. Request 46 submitted by WZ8Y84 on 4/30/2010 <time>
2. Forwarded by Administrator on 04/30/2010 <time> on behalf of FZ62V1 to forward approver RZW8G8 with return
3. Request approved by RZW8G8 on behalf of FZ62V1 on 04/30/2010 <time>
When you look at the request, it is still in the original approver stage, was not moved to the next stage.  Any ideas on why it works this way?

Jack,
  The audit log clearly explains why.
2. Forwarded by Administrator on 04/30/2010 <time> on behalf of FZ62V1 to forward approver RZW8G8 with return
When you forward a request, you need to choose 'Forward with Return' and 'Forward with No Return'. In this case, the approver selected 'Forward with Return' so the request will get approved but will come back to the original approver who forwarded the request.
Regards,
Alpesh

Similar Messages

  • How to restrict the last record and not moving to next reocrd

    1) how to restrict the last record and not moving to next reocrd.
    2) Also for the F6 key(for new record).

    When you are on the last record, next-record will create a new one, so that my question is do you want to forbid new record creation.
    Francois

  • Requests that are forwarded to another approver are not going to next stage

    We are having an issue with AE 5.2 with Forwarded requests.  When requests are forwarded to another approver and this person then approves the requests, they are not going on to the next stage in our workflow.  We have the Forward Type option set to 'Any one Approver' for the workflow stage.  Have also tried forwarding the requests with both the Forward With No Return and Forward With Return options.
    The approver that is receiving these Forwards is not listed as one of the approvers for the role in the request.  Is this the issue, are we not using the Forward process correctly, or is this a bug in AE 5.2.  (I think we are currently on SP 9 of GRC 5.2.)
    Thanks.

    Hi Bob,
    I am running AE 5.2 but do not use the "forward" feature. For request that require "role approvers" I have set up a seperate initiaor that includes the additional Stage for Role approval.
    I have initiators for 1) New User w/ no role approval 2) New User w/ role approval 3) Change User w/ no role approval 4) Change User w/ no role approval
    My "no role approvals" go through three stages 1) security initial review 2) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning; my "role approvals" go through four stages 1) security initial review 2) Role Approval Stage 3) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning
    If a request has roles that require approval and some that do not, the request will take the two seperate paths based on the roles defined for each; the provisoning will complete once both paths have completed all stages
    This allows us to treat the role approval just like any stage with assigned approvers and if multiple approvers allow for any one approver to complete the stage
    This is different from your approach of forwarding for role approval; I define the roles to the initialtors that require role approval, but gives you another perspective of doing it
    Jerry Synoga
    Ryerson,Inc.
    630-758-2021

  • Items not moved to Second Stage Recycle Bin

    Hello,
    Trying to do some digging into SharePoint 2010 Recycle Bin.
    I've noticed that although items, when deleted, are being moved to the First Stage Recycle Bin, if they are deleted from that location they do not seem to be moved into the Second Stage Recycle Bin.
    I think I am correct in saying that in order for items to be purged from any recycle bins or moved from First Stage to Second Stage the Recycle Bin Timer Job needs to run for that particular Site Collection.
    Although I have manually run this job, and it returns a success message, the items still don't appear in the 2nd Stage Recycle Bin.
    What I have noticed though is when I run this Timer Job it only reports as running on the Application Server and then twice on one of the Web Servers. The other Web Server isn't mentioned in the Time Job History at all. I'm not sure whether this is the key
    to this issue but would appreciate any advice...........

    Solved it! And the answer is pretty stupid.
    Basically when you browse to the Second Stage Recycle Bin you go to a URL ending in
    /_layouts/AdminRecycleBin.aspx
    This is actually the "roll up" view of the First Stage Recycle Bin. If you have the left hand navigation enabled it's listed as "End user Recycle Bin items"
    If you change the URL to:
    /_layouts/AdminRecycleBin.aspx?View=2
    Then this is the Second Stage Recycle bin. Again if you have the left hand navigation enabled it's listed as "Deleted from end user Recycle Bin"
    Because the template I had applied to this site has removed the left hand navigation I didn't realise which bin I was really looking at. Once I had amended the URL all the items were there in the Second Stage Bin.
    I'm still a little confused about the Recycle Bin Timer Job as this seems to run on different servers in the farm depending on which Web Application's Time Job you are running.
    Hope all my testing helps someone!

  • ITunes 7.0.1.8 - Party Shuffle not moving to next track.

    Can anyone help?
    Since I upgraded to the version above the Party Shuffle only plays one song at a time. All others work fine and play continually.
    Bit of a pain because I use Party Shuffle all the time!

    i have been experiencing the same problem and itz still not fixed after i had made sure that the 'crossfade playback' is selected. i just dont get it. and then, itunes also seems to highlight the playing track in total blue, which it did not regualarly do-weird.
    then, i have also tried re-installing which makes no difference and even worse, i tried installiing the previous version but it wont work cuz it cant read the library that was created by the latest version. so, am stuck with itunes that just wont work properly! this *****! life is just not 'hapenin' without party shuffle!
      Windows XP Pro  

  • Workflow is not moving to next incase of asynchronous task

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a requirement to use asynchronous method and tasks in my workflow. For completing the asynchronous tasks, I am calling SWE_EVENT_CREATE with an event to complete the task from Web Dynpro Application. However, Event Linkage has benn deactivated automatically and the task remains in InProcess status.
    Please provide your suggestions ASAP.
    Thanks in Advance
    Gopal.

    For completing the asynchronous tasks, I am calling SWE_EVENT_CREATE
    with an event to complete the task from Web Dynpro Application
    Make sure that after calling the above Funciton module you have defined a COMMIT WORK statement. But before this as you were saying that the event linkage got deactivated, so please make sure that the event linkage is active......

  • GRC 10 - request not able to go to next stage

    Dear Expert ,
    Getting very strange behaviour from MSMP workflow . Request is able to pick right path reaches first stage (Line manager) without any problem . But when line approver approves it ,its not going to next stage i.e role owner .
    Getting error messge " Error when trying to complete/forward work item xxx" .
    I have already checked WF-Batch user permisison ,its fine .I am SP07.
    Thanks in advacne for your help .
    Best Regards
    Asheesh

    Hello Asheesh
    Check SWIA and see the error, and take the task id and make sure the Task ID should be General Task.
    Regards,
    Chandra

  • SQL Developer, Deploy Cloud Cart Status is at Approved for a long time and not moving forward i.e. not processing.

    SQL Developer, Deploy Cloud Cart Status is at Approved for a long time and not moving forward i.e. not processing.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Srinivas

    Hi Gustavo,
    It appears your Service SFTP user was not created correctly. Please contact support and mention the fact that your Service SFTP user appears on Security/Users tab and not on Security/SFTP Users tab.
    Vlad

  • Workflow Manager disaster recovery old instances not moving forward

    Dear ALL,
    I am facing an issue in workflow manager 1.0 disaster recovery.
    I followed all the steps to recover workflow manager 1.0 mentioned in MSDN, new instances which I have created after restoration working fine, but the old workflow instances when I complete any of the task does not moving forward even the workflow is
    not getting suspended there is no error please see the screen shot. 
    Regards,
    Faraz Javaid

    Hi I did not republish the workflow and the behavior was same for old workflow instances as mentioned in my question.
    Then I republished the workflow thinking that it might solve the problem but the result remain the same. I have check the Logs but unfortunately I did not find any noticeable error.
    Faraz Javaid

  • HT4623 I am upgrading my iPad to iOS 7 but the progress bar is at 1/4 position for two hours and not moving forward. Is there any problem with it? What should I do? Thanks.

    I am upgrading my iPad to iOS 7 but the progress bar is at 1/4 position for two hours and not moving forward. Is there any problem with it? What should I do? Thanks.

    This is a concern amoung many corporate users.  It's going to take somekind of policy change with apple.
    Enterprise support:
    Call enterprise support  (866) 752-7753  to create  a case ID number

  • Open transport request in Development server which is not moved to Producti

    HI All,
    I am doing upgrade from ECC5.0 to ECC6. EHP4.
    We have some open Transport request in development server which are not moved to PRD.
    Now client wants to stabilize their both the systems, want to compare each trasport in PRD.
    My question is, if they dont want that request to move to PRD, what we have to do?
    We have to delete the tranport and select the active version of tranport which is there in PRD or how.
    Please suggest me how to proceed for this scenario. we have lot of transports. ( Tables,programs,classes,methods,etc.,)
    Regards,
    sarath

    Hello Sarath,
    1st question: did you already finish your upgrade? If not, at which phase is it at?
    2nd: did you upgrade your DEV system already to the same level as PRD?
    3rd: were these transports generated in an old version (like ECC 5.0)? If yes, and now you have an ECC 6.0 system, you must not import them on this system, as they have different versions. If you do it, you'll make your system inconsistent.
    Please clarify on these points so we can help you.
    Best regards,
    Tomas Black

  • Playhead not moving forward

    Hello
    The clip shows up in the canvas but the playhead is not moving forward in the timeline making it impossible to edit.
    Thanks for your help!

    Here's the info-
    Type: clip
    Creator Quick Time Player
    Source Macintosh HD:Users
    Size 516.7 mb
    Tracks Iv 2 a
    Vid rate: 59.94 fps
    Frame size 720x 480
    Compressor MPEG-4 video
    Data rate 310.0 k/sec
    Pixel NTSC  ccir 601
    Field Dominace: None
    Alpha None/Ignore
    Composite Normal
    Audio 1 stereo
    Aud Rate 48.0 khz
    Aud Format 32 - bit floating point
    Sequence Properties
    Tracks
    1V, 2A
    Vid rate 29.97 fps
    Frame Size 720x480
    Compressor DV/DVSPRO - NTSC
    Pixel Aspect NTSC - CCIR 601
    Field Dominance Lower (Even)
    Audio 2 Outputs
    Aud Rate 48.0 KHZ
    Aud Format 32 Bit Floating Rate
    I expiremented and "Toasted" the files to DV and now the playhead is moving forward. Is it because FCE perfers DV files?
    Thanks for your help and any info is appreciated.

  • GWTDOMAIN Service request not forwarded to remote site gwerrno(402019)

    Hi
    my tuxedo sometime take errors as followed:
    084405.guzqz2!GWTDOMAIN.11056: LIBGW_CAT:1029: ERROR: Service request not forwarded to remote site:"TPESVCERR - server error while handling request" gwerrno*(402019)*
    084521.guzqz2!GWTDOMAIN.11056: LIBGW_CAT:1029: ERROR: Service request not forwarded to remote site:"TPESVCERR - server error while handling request" gwerrno(402019)
    OS: SCO Open Server506
    tuxedo version: 6.5
    patchlev: 455
    it will come OK each time 10-20 minutes after it take such errors.
    I checked the pq and IPCs . there seems to be no blocked process or queqes .
    have anybody solved problem like this?
    Please help. Thanks a lot
    =======================================
    pq
    Prog Name Queue Name # Serve WkQueued # Queued Ave. Len Machine
    C00000 00001.00015 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    BBL 140000 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    DMADM 00001.00010 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    WSL 00001.00005 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    GWTDOMAIN gwgrp 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    C00000 00001.00011 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    B31296 00003.00060 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    GWADM 00001.00020 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    ================================
    IPCS
    ipcs -a
    IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Sep 25 09:03:30 2008
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIME RTIME CTIME
    Message Queues:
    q 16141 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 27406 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 21263 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 22288 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 4881 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11055 11054 23:11:32 23:11:32 23:11:32
    q 8466 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11054 11055 23:11:32 23:11:32 23:11:32
    q 22291 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11065 11056 9:01:36 9:01:36 23:11:32
    q 13588 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11056 11059 9:01:33 9:01:33 23:11:32
    q 277 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 24854 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11062 10:53:01 10:53:01 23:11:32
    q 18711 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 24856 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 29465 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 11546 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 29467 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11063 9:01:26 9:01:26 23:11:33
    q 15132 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 15133 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11057 11064 16:04:23 16:04:23 23:11:33
    q 6942 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11065 9:01:33 9:01:33 23:11:33
    q 29471 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 11040 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 29473 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 15138 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11068 11:09:39 11:09:39 23:11:33
    q 15651 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:34
    q 7460 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:34
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NATTCH SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME DTIME CTIME
    Shared Memory:
    m 0 0x000018e5 --rw-rw-rw-     root      sys     root      sys      2  23228   547   549 11:44:34 no-entry 11:44:34
    m 12307 0x0002c309 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 23 791012 11049 11150 8:59:50 8:59:56 23:11:30
    m 12308 0x00000000 rw----- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 4 1568 11050 11053 23:11:32 no-entry 23:11:32
    m 12309 0x00000000 rw----- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 2 69967 11055 11056 23:11:32 no-entry 23:11:32
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME
    Semaphores:
    s 26009 0x0002c309 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 3 9:03:21 23:11:30
    s 26010 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 26011 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 13012 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 26013 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 26014 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 28 7:55:00 23:11:32
    Edited by: user7335851 on 2008-9-25 上午2:19

    There's a similar case to that in which the solution was to upgrade the patchlev of Tuxedo software. The latest RP for Tuxedo 6.5 resolve some issues related to GWTDOMAIN process.
    501. CR266129 Tuxedo 6.5 RP496: LIBGW_CAT:1029 Service request not forwarded - TPELIMIT (S-34477)
    517. CR342496 Tx 6.5 [propagation] pq in tmadmin report too large number for GWTDOMAIN, not match ipcs results (S-42376)
    Many things related to domains have been fixed.
    I hope that solves your problem.
    Regards.

  • Technical: Port Forward Does Not Show Requesting IP Properly

    I have a server that blocks failed attempts to login via FTP but after my switch to the AEBS, I realized that when the unit forwards requests through to my server, it forwards the request from the router's IP itself of 192.168.1.1 instead of showing the IP number of the requesting entity. As such, when my server goes to block the failed login, it blocks my router entirely, which prevents any legitimate logins from working unless I remove the 192.168.1.1 address from the blocklist on my server. Is there some kind of way to adjust the AEBS to show the appropriate IP number during the port forwarding process?
    Message was edited by: Chuck H.

    I figured it out.  I'm trying to access the port from my work network and the firewalls are blocking the outbound traffic on that port.  I just tried an accessing the iport from my mobile phone and I was able to get a reply.  So the lesson learned is try and access the ip/port from another network because there may be a firewall blocking your access.

  • Project Online Workflow not moving forward after approval

    I'm building a custom workflow for a Project Online tenant using SD2013 but something is not working with approvals.
    In SD I create the workflow with very simple actions:
    1. Wait for submit
    2. Create approval task
    3. In stage transition, if task ended with "Approved", move to the next stage, if not, go to "Cancelled" step
    Everything works fine until the approval. I see the task, approve it but then nothing happens. The task appears as "Completed" and "Approved" but the workflow just stays there.
    I had this very same behavior on a couple of deployments in the past with Project Server 2010 in Spanish.
    The tenant created the Project Web App in Spanish as well. Could this be the cause? How can I correct it?
    Thanks in advance.
    Rene Alvarez

    I am also having the same issue.
    The task appears in the list, I approve it, then nothing happens. No error, no feedback, no history list log (I put in a log statement right after the approval task, it never runs), the workflow status page still remains as "Started".
    Any ideas?
    If online is as slow as processing approval actions overnight, then it is simply unusable.
    120811049008

Maybe you are looking for

  • DVI to VGA and DVI to Television

    I have a MacBook PRO. Below is the profile for display. I would like to connect an external monitor and I would also like to connect my computer to Television to watch movies. Both my TV's are over 4 years old and have S-Video as well as RBG (Y/pb/ P

  • Wrong date and time in apple's mail client

    All mails in my inbox are displaying date at 1429 a.c. Although through my web gmail interface, dates are correct the mac client is fault. I also tried with Thunderbird e-mail client and i also get wrong date and time. I checked the date and time pre

  • E-mail asking for account verification

    I had got a few e-mails that say "Final Warning update!" Is this legit!? This is the e-mail I got: Body Account Verification Talk21 has discovered series of illegal attempts on your account from a bad Ip Location and will shut your account as it has

  • "Live Tile" Background on Mac

    What I'm looking for is a way to have a changing tile background on my laptop and desktop Mac's. What I'm imagining is similar to the "Shifting Tiles" screensaver on the Apple TV. I know I can set the backgrounds to change/rotate on a given interval,

  • Running a query in which table name and column name are passed as arguments

    Hello, I have a pl/sql code in which table_name and column_name are defined as variables. I want to run a sql query like update table_name set column_name = <value> where id='xyz'; How can I achieve this? Thanks in advance. Regards.