Currency not taken in order creation

In Customer master record currency is maintained to $USD, while creating an order system throwing message " Exchange rate"ll be redetermined" & order gets created in INR.
What to do?
URGENT!

Dear Friend,
You can maintain exchange rate in OB08 or OC41.
You can also maintian exchange rate in Sales Order - Go to Item Details - Sales A Tab page - enter exhange rate in Exch. Rate feild...
Hope this helps...
Reward if useful...
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta
Mumbai
98700 10230

Similar Messages

Credit block should not prevent service order creation

An upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6, without any changes made to the configuration or program change, has lead to the following issue. ECC6 is not creating a service order connected to a sales order, when the customer has exceeded the credit limit. The sales order of custom order type is getting saved with a warning message that credit limit has exceeded. However, earlier in 4.7, the message would not stop creating subsequent service order. What could be different, that prevent ECC6 environment to hold on to service order creation? A subsequent release of the credit block through VKM1 however triggers the service order being created.

Are you using credit card processing in SAP to get the authorization?
If you are then the authorization should not block the order.
Or are you using credit card as a form of payment (without authorization) in which case this needs to be put on the customers account as a payment and then the order entered.
Where are you holding the credit card details?

TCode PRRW: Document Currency not taken from Travel Expense Report Currency

Hi,
We created a Trip Request using TCode TRIP and also created Travel Expense Report for the same Trip in which some of the payments were to be made to Vendor. We have Travel expense receipts in currency SGD. After settling the Trip and creating Posting Run, we made postings to FI using TCode PRRW. As a result of TCode PRRW, system considered INR as document currency and made postings in INR (same is also reflecting in the FBL1N report for Vendor).
Why system is considering INR as document currency instead of SGD as the expense receipts were entered in SGD in Travel Expense Report?
Regards,
CMC Team

Hi Aldo Manuel Sanz Castro,
Can you please explain in detail what are the changes you had done i am also facing the same problem if you share information in detail alone with screen shot it will very helpful to me
thanks in advance
thanks
Trinath

Vendor block code for release order creation but no purchase order creation

The client has a vendor block code which when applied to a vendor through vendor block screen should allow release order creations against existing contracts and ARC but it should not allow purchase order creation. However, it is allowing purchase order creation also. Can anyone tell how to achieve this selective treatment that allows RO creation against existing contracts and ARCs' but no PO creation.
Are there any settings or configurations that have to be made in SPRO and other areas to achieve this.I would appreiate if anyone could give in a detailed and step wise solution.

Hi
Take out all the blocks on company code and purchasing organization in XK05.
Only put block function as 01 (purchase order). It will not allow you to create purchase order but you can create contracts and release orders against contracts.
Thanks
Edited by: Praveen Raghavendra on Jan 8, 2009 2:30 PM

Line item Ship-to Info is not the same in Header Ship-to Party During Sales Order Creation via IDOC

We have observed that during creation of sales order using idoc, the line item ship-to party is not the same with header ship-to. The ship-to party info in line item is equivalent to the header's sold to party. To give you a quick background, Sold to party info is given in idoc and ship to party is being determined using table EDPAR. In this specific scenario, sold to customer is not the same with ship to customer.
Initial checking on the code leads us in function module VIEW_KUAGV. This FM populates partner details of sales order header and line item in program LVEDAF1Z
Below is the code for Sales order Header. Notice that WE_INPUT parameter which contains Ship to party is passed as exporting parameter in FM VIEW_KUAGV. This is the reason why Ship to Party is populated correctly in sales order header but not in sales order item.
Initially, it first set to Sold-To Party. However, if WE_INPUT is given or provided, partner details is set to Ship-To Party.
Please advise on how we can make the ship to party info in header and line item be consistent. This is SAP Standard program which why we are hesitant to make change on the program. If there is a configuration to make this happen, kindly advise.
Regards,
Rommel

Hi Jayesh,
If I understand you correctly, you want that when creating SO from Quoatation
the Ship to Party also follow/copy Ship to Party from Quotation, right?
Just to confirm with you, when you creating SO reference from Quotation, you
use copy/follow-up function, am I right?
You can do this by setting in configuration of Copy Control (like mentioned by Hui).
Step as follow :
1. Go to IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions
2. Create your BAdi (Business Add-In for Copying Control), such as get Ship to
    Party value from source document and use it in current document
3. Use this Rule you have created in BAdi (no. 2), in copy control transaction type
    IMG->CRM->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for
    Business Transactions-> Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
4. Here you set Copying Routine for your transaction types (put name of your Badi
    created in step no. 2)
Or alternatively, you can set it on access sequence in Partner Function
Ship to Party in configuration. You can define access sequence the Ship
to Party is taken from Preceeding Document -> Ship To Party
1. Go to Partner Function access sequence :
    IMG->CRM->Basic Functions->Partner Processing->Define Access Sequence
2. Create new access sequence with following entry :
    - Source COM_PARTNER_A (PrecedingPartner)
    - Check Mapping for Partner Being search
    - Partner Function in Source = Ship To Party
3. Assign this Access Sequence in you Partner Function used in Sales Order Transaction
   Type.
Tell me if this is what you looking for
Gun.

Sales Order creation with Ship to not assigned to Sold to

Hi There,
I have an issue that I am able to create an order with a Ship to which is not assigned to Sold to. i.e, The sold to accepts any ship to and not giving any error. I am giving both Sold to and Ship to together while order creation. Is it because of this? Should I enter sold to and then press enter for the list of Ship to's assigned to that? I dont find any issues in the Partner determination.
Can you help?
Thanks in advance,
Renjith

Hi Renjith,
I agree with you that SAP allows you to enter any ship to(belonging to sales org of sold-to party) for a given sold to party.
To meet your requirement, You may like to use the Userexit MV45AFZZ (Form USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE) to check the Ship-to while saving. Thus a comparison could be made with assigned Ship-Tos for the given Sold-to party. In case there is a mismatch throw a error message before allowing committing of save.
Your developer would be able to help you to achieve this
Please let me know if this helps
Warm regards
Harpreet

Not scheduling on manual creation of planned order

Creating planned order through MD11 and noticed there scheduling not done and capacity planning not done and on doing scheduling manually dates altered and capacity planned which are appearing in CM01 for the respective week
Planned order created through MRP are fine with scheduling an capacity planning .
Please let us know what could be a reason for not updating on manual creation.

Hi
This is standard behavior of SAP as when you create the planned order through MD11 manually , you need to do the detailed scheduling manually by executing schedule in Edit>Schedule.
Check this thread:
Need Automatic Lead-time scheduling in Planned Order using MD11
Regards,
Anupam Sharma

Document is in transfer for purchase order.Creation not possible

Dear All,
We did partial confirmation in EBP and later when trying to do confiramtion for the remaining quantiy getting the message"document is in transfer for purchase order.Creation not possible"
We are taking this problem in production as well as in quality systems also.
What are possible reason and how to solve it.
kindly share your views.
Thank you.

Hi yshu,
use tcode bd87 in SRM to check for failed confirmation IDOC (type MBGMCR).
The double click the status record to see the exact cause of the failure.
Rectify the error. Then try to execute the IDOC from BD87 tcode.
For a few errors you may not be able to execute the IDOC but to create a new confirmation in SRM. In such cases, follow the below procedure..
There should be an entry for the confirmation in the transfer table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB in SRM. Display the details.
Then run FM "BBP_DELETE_FROM_DOCUMENT_TAB" to delete the entry from the doc tab table.
Then post a new confirmation in SRM.
There is also a FM in SRM using which you can change the status of thefailed IDOC from 51 to 68 or 31.
Rgds,
MJ

Document in transfer for purchase order - creation not possible

Hi Experts,
we get this error when we do confirmation"'document in transfer for purchase order - creation not possible'"
any inputs are appreciated
Rg
sam

Hi All,
We have resolved the above problem.
When user does confirmation ,if it sucessfully created then there will be no entry in BBP_Document_tab table.If it's in error in process and next time when user tries to do GR then he will encounter a pop up message "Document in transfer for PO, creation not possible".
So we need to delete the entries from table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB using FM BBP_DELETE_FROM_DOCUMENT_TAB.
Then check again in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB now there will be noentry there...so now user can do the confirmation from SRM,he will not encounter this error now.
Thanks to all the ppl who has replied
sameer

Return Order Creation with Multiple Lines not possible - EHP3

Hi Experts,
We are facing an issue while creating Return Orders with external reference billing document post upgrade from CRM 7.0 to EHP3.
While we select multiple line items from the external reference billing document and Create a return order(BT120H_CPL/NewComplEF ), the very first line item gets repeated instead of all the line items getting copied to the subsequent view(BT120H_CPL/ItemList ).
Please help.
Thanks,
Rohit

I hope you have tried.If not can you please try with below qualifier
'015' Billing Document Number of Invoicing Party
Provide the billing document EEDK02-BELNR.
Also give qualifier at item level
E1EDP02 : use Qualifier =15
Provide the Billing document number at E1EDP02_BELNR and item at ZEILE.
I am not sure what is error you are getting when you are referencing billing document.If something STD Idoc is not working as you expected use your custom logic to bring the data when you are posting the Idoc.
I have not worked on sales order process,But I have worked on Purchase Order creation process.
Please let me know the error ,If i know the error i will defiantly help you.

Today at 8am est my card was charged but when checking order status it saids expected ship date not available at this time and it also saids we received your order and it is in process . payment not taken yet

today at 8am est my card was charged but when checking order status it saids expected ship date not available at this time and it also saids we received your order and it is in process . payment not taken yet
but card was charged full amount and i havent gotten anything else been checking for update all day and got nothing i did order iphone 6 plus at 3:01am and everything went through and i was finsihed at 3:06am

chriss2633,
I know how exciting it is to have all the information on the new phone. I did send you a Direct Message. Can you please respond back to that message? Looking forward to hearing back from you.
KevinR_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Incoterms in sales order: part 2 is not taken from header to item level

Dears,
I got a customer with incoterm DDP in part 1 and a city "Hamburg" in part 2.
When I create a sales order, I change part 2 from "Hamburg" into "Berlin" before I insert items.
Unfortunately the changed content ("Berlin") is not taken to item level, there is still standing "Hamburg".
I haven't found any solution for that behaviour.
I hope, any one can answer how to solve that.
Many thanks.
Chris

Thanks for reply.
The flag is already checked, so there must be another reason.
But, in the meantime, I found out, that there is a difference between some users.
Some users can change the incoterm at item level, some others cannot.
What could be the reason? Some profile settings?

Sales order creation is not possible for this notification type

Hello,
I want to create Sales Order through following menu:
Notification -- Functions - Sales order - CreateSelection of Order Type.
But I get following message:
'Sales order creation is not possible for this notification type'
The message says: No sales order type is assigned to the notification type.
But I did not find any such configuration where I can assign notification type to Sales Order document type.
Please help.
regards

Transaction OIM9
Menu Path
Customizing > Plant Maintenance and Customer Service > Maintenance and Service Processing > Maintenance and Service Notifications > Notification Creation > Notification Types > Define Order Types and Special Notification Parameters
Nomally CS (customer service) area use this function.
Regards
Luke

QM01: manual address of an order is not taken into QM notification

Hi all,
I have a problem:
I'd like to create a QM notification with QM01 (type Q1) in relation to an order, which has a manual address in the ship-to-party. The problem is, that the manual address is not taken over to the notification at the partner role ship-to-party. There is taken the address of the customer masterdata.
Do I have a chance to change the source of the address (order instead of masterdata?)
Many thanks in advance!
Chris

Ok,
thanks for reply.
But, in ernest, it doesn't make sense, because on the one side you're applying to an order in which you change the address to which the goods are sent to. On the other side this address is not taken to the notification and you have to change the address a second time.
Masterdata cannot be changed, because that one is used for different addresses...
Chris

Profit Center was not maintained during order n billing creation.

Dear, Gurus
I'm facing a problem of Profit Center. User created a service material, maintenance contract. They created a Billing Document as it is order related billing. Accounting document was not generated when saving invoice. When I got to the bottom of this I realized no costing tabs were ever maintained for material type services. (Henceforth no Profit Center in Sales Order n Invoice).
I have done the necessary config n assignments but question now is what should I do as in billing doc the field is greyed out it will not allow me to assign Pr Center now. I am thinking that this may work if I cancel the billing document and then go back to sales order and try and changing the field, then re-create the invoice. I'm trying to avoid canceling. Is there any program, bapi, user exit I may use to re assign or make system re check the MM while saving invoice to allow accounting document to be created? This is one scenario.
2nd scenario is similar but in the case of this contract everything was made. Accounting document was cleared even but with some dummy weird Profit Center. (No proft center in Order nor invoice.) Whole problem at first in this scenario is User saying everything is complete so status in doc flow should show maintenance contract as complete but wasn't. it showed being processed. I discovered no completion rule was maintained. I maintained E Full target value referenced but status still has not changed any idea guys? (New config not showing on old existing data only show on new document, concept?) Is there a program or anything to make system update status doc flow? aside from this Profit center incompletion log is coming in Contract. Not maintained in order or invoice.

In one of my earlier projects, a similar requirement was putforth by users and we had developed a zee tcode to change the profit center in billing document via SM30 which can be done only by FI authorised users.
I am reproducing the said program as under:-
REPORT "ZPROFIT_CHG"
TABLES : VBRP.
SELECTION-SCREEN : BEGIN OF BLOCK B1 WITH FRAME.
SELECT-OPTIONS : SO_VBELN FOR VBRP-VBELN OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS:      P_PRO LIKE VBRP-PRCTR OBLIGATORY.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK B1.
DATA : BEGIN OF IT_VBRP OCCURS 0,
        VBELN LIKE VBRP-VBELN,
        POSNR LIKE VBRP-POSNR,
        PRCTR LIKE VBRP-PRCTR,
      END OF IT_VBRP.
DATA COUNT(3).
DATA W_MESSAGE(30).
START-OF-SELECTION.
LOOP AT SO_VBELN.
       IF SO_VBELN-LOW CA '~`!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-><,.;":' OR SO_VBELN-HIGH CA '~`!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-><,.;":'.
           MESSAGE 'Special character not allowed' type 'S'.
           LEAVE LIST-PROCESSING.
           STOP.
       ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
IF P_PRO CA '~`!@#$%^&*()_+|\=-><,.;":'.
           MESSAGE 'Special character not allowed' type 'S'.
           LEAVE LIST-PROCESSING.
           STOP.
ENDIF.
SELECT B~VBELN B~POSNR B~PRCTR FROM VBRK AS A INNER JOIN VBRP AS B ON A~VBELN EQ B~VBELN INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_VBRP
                            WHERE A~VBELN IN SO_VBELN
                            AND   A~FKART EQ 'ZFF2'
                            AND   A~FKSTO NE 'X'.
IF SY-DBCNT EQ 0.
      MESSAGE 'NO DATA FOUND' TYPE 'S'.
      LEAVE LIST-PROCESSING.
ENDIF.
SORT IT_VBRP BY VBELN.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM IT_VBRP COMPARING VBELN.
CLEAR COUNT.
IF IT_VBRP[] IS NOT INITIAL AND P_PRO IS NOT INITIAL..
      LOOP AT IT_VBRP.
          UPDATE VBRP SET PRCTR = P_PRO WHERE VBELN = IT_VBRP-VBELN AND POSNR = IT_VBRP-POSNR.
          IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
             COUNT = COUNT + 1.
          ENDIF.
          COMMIT WORK.
          CLEAR IT_VBRP.
      ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
IF COUNT IS NOT INITIAL.
    CONCATENATE 'No Of Records Updated Is - ' COUNT INTO W_MESSAGE.
    MESSAGE I000(ZSFL) WITH W_MESSAGE.
ELSE.
    MESSAGE 'No Records Updated' TYPE 'S'.
ENDIF.
Since I am so weak in ABAP coding, not sure whether the above coding is correct. You need to check with your ABAPers and develop this logic. This should work.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Currency not taken in order creation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for