Curreny posted in Distribution Cycle
Hi,
I have created a distribution cycle which makes up to USD a local currency of USD 100,000 and document currency SGD 75,000. The distribution cycle shows correctly both currencies in the sender and receiver.
However, when I looked at the GL balance of the distributed GL account, the distribution document shows USD in both Local currency and document currency.
Local Currency Document Currency
Sender 1 100,000 (USD) 75,000 (SGD)
Sender 1 -100,000 (USD) -100,000 (USD)
Receiver 1 60,000 (USD) 60,000 (USD)
Receiver 2 40,000 (USD) 40,000 (USD)
In distribution, it is possible to have SGD equivalent posted to the receiver cost centers in the document currency field ?
Regards,
Leslie
Hello Ajay,
Thank you soo much for your quick response. Yes i have assigned the cost element category in KA06. After assigning the cost element i did test run (KSUB). It is not showing any values in the sender/Receiver. I need to post the planned values. Could you please tell me the procedure what to do to see the values assinged to sender/receiver 50%-50%.
Sincere regards.
Similar Messages
-
Distribution cycle posting incorrect
Hello
We have just upgraded to ECC 6 and are facing an issue in OCtober months Distribution cycle.
An SKF is created with following values costcenter A 336 units, cost center B 440 units and Cost center C 500 units. The distribution cycle is defined correctly and till september was posting correctly.
Now in October post the upgrade when the distribution cycle is run it picks up the indirect cost (total amount 25 million) and posts only 23 million, further even this 23 million it posts incorrectly i.e correct value should have been 23mil/1276 units X 336,440 & 500 units respectively.
However its is posting very weird values like in Cc A 100,000 & B 15 milion & balance in CC 3.
I'am unable to understand why it has picked 23 million i/of 25 million which is the actual cost to be distrbuted and further why the distribution is not matching to the SKF document posted.
this problem has come post the upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6, Could you help us out
Thanks
NelsonHello
Thanks for your suggestion, have checked all the settings for the cycle nothing has changed. I've been able to trace the computation of the posting made using runtime analysis.
In the particular instance what has happened is at the time of allocation the system has doubled the quantity in SKF document and posted the allocation basis this. fo eg in my SKF document the for Cost center A, B C the qty defined was 49, 9, 115 units at the time of allocation it has been considered as 98,18 and 230 units. This has happened for all the cost centers barring one defined in the SKF document.
Any idea why this would have happened.
Thanks
Nelson -
Distribution Cycle error: "No Senders have been found"
Hello,
I have created a distribution cycle in FAGLGA31 with three segments with the following criteria,
Sender:
Account, Profit Centre C postings and Functional Area YB20
Receiver:
function area YB20, profit center A: 80%
functional area YB20, profit center B 20%
Likewise I have the other 2 segments with different % of distribution.
But when I am trying to execute the cycle in FAGLGA35, i am getting the error message that "no sender has been found". Please find below the details of the error message. I have checked the cycle completely and all the relevant master data exists. Also transactional data relating to document type SA also exists in the system.
Cycle 0L2050, start date 20110101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0L2050, starting date 20110101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Request help on how to correct this.Dear Latha,
the most common reason for error message GA749 in NewGL allocation is
that wrong "version" is specified in cycle header. Actual data in NewGL
is stored with version 001 (RVERS), so please make sure this value is
specified on cycle header, instead of 000, for example.
I hope this can help.
Mauri -
Distribution cycle for cost centers
Hi,
I have created a distribution cycle for cost centers using SKF. I have even created document using KB31N. based on this document the sender should have some amount after executing the distribution cycle, but here the sender value is completely distributed to recievers leading to incorrect results.
Can any one help me solve this?
Thanks,
SravanthiHello
Pls check the rule once again.
You use allocation rules to determine how amounts and quantities are allocated between sender objects (sender values) and receiver objects (receiver tracing factor). The rules for the allocation types are made up of sender and receiver rules.
Sender rules
Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
Posted amounts
Fixed amounts
Fixed rates
Receiver rules
Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
Variable portions
Fixed amounts
Fixed percentages
Fixed portions
Reg
assign points if useful -
Assign Functional area to Profit Center Distribution Cycle postings
Hi All,
I am using a NEW GL distribution cycle (Tran Code : FAGLGA35) for distributing balances in the Dummy Profit center to relevent Profit centers.
My Company is using Functional area for FIN STAT Ver and other reportings. When I run the profit center distribution cycle, it distirbutes the amounts but doesnot assign the Functional areas to the posting. Is there a way I can pass the functional area of the relevent postings of the accounts to the postings of each distribution postings.
Thanks
MKRDear MKR,
Thank you for using the SAP SDN Forums,
In this particular case, you could have a look at the following to
see if it helps you, but I have not tested this for your case
so it is not being offered as a definite solution:
You could look at using FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE which might be able to
help you to get the results that you want.
Due to the inheritance logic in allocation, if you set "transfer
field" option active for the field (T811I-INHER), the system copies
the sender value to the receiver if the receive value is not specified.
Please refer to SAP Help portal:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/40/e1510735f30baee10000000a114cbd/frameset.htm
You can deactivate "transfer field" flag in customizing
and use BAdI : FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE to substitute the intended
functional area. (This BAdI is the "official" way to substitute any
field during allocation, rather than OBBH substitution.)
I hope this may be of some assistance in resolving the issue.
Kind Regards,
Brendan -
Distribution Cycle: Cost Centre is a mandatory field for GL Acct
hello,
When I am executing the distribution cycle in FAGLGA35 in update mode I am getting the error (Message no. F5808) "Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account xxxxxx" as detailed below:
Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2050 599030
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "599030" in company code "2050" linked to the field selection for posting key "40".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
As per the Field Status Group assigned to the master data of this GL Account, cost centre is an required entry. Further I am not able to change the Field status Group of this GL since this GL acct contains some balance.
Could someone please help me on how to overcome this issue.
Regards,
LavanyaHello Ravi,
Thanks for your response.
I have tried the option you have provided but user donot want to use the OKB9 option and neither she wants to change the field status group of the GL Acct by which Cost Centre can made an optional field.
Can you please tell me if we can integrate a cost center in the distribution cycle so that the allocation can be done also for accounts for which a cost center is mandatory ? We can define a cost centre that will be used only for this allocation and that will be the same for all the accounts.
Request your inputs on this.
Regards,
Lavanya -
Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk
Hi Experts,
Please help me out
iam getting an error while running a Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk box.
When run the same in the test run, there isn't any error log. but when i deselect the same & run iam getting an error like
First Message:
Balance per segment 9999 is not zero
Message no. FAGL_COFI025
Diagnosis
Balance per segment 9999 is not zero.
The balance on segment 9999 is 50.00 (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00 (controlling area currency).
System Response
With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
Procedure
If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
2nd Message
Balance per segment 1000 is not zero
Message no. FAGL_COFI025
Diagnosis
Balance per segment 1000 is not zero.
The balance on segment 1000 is 50.00- (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00- (controlling area currency).
System Response
With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
Procedure
If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
3rd Message
No update performed due to an error
Message no. GA719
Diagnosis
A serious error occurred during processing.
System Response
Processing is continued as far as possible, but results are not posted.
Procedure
This error is shown in the error list before this error message. Here you can find more information about this particular error.
I would appreciate an early reply........!!!
Thanks & Regards,
NeelaHi,
Check notes 764652 and 897086; it might be helpful.
Regards,
Eli -
Dear co experts,
I have 32 sendor cost centers and i have 2 recivers cost centers
In this is two recivers i have allocate the cost 80% to one cost centers and 20% to another cost cenetrs.
In this scenario how to create the distribution cycles.i mean if i create saparate cycles for sendors cost centers or only one cycle is sufficient
Kindly help me on this scenario.
Regards
venkataswamyHi,
create only one distribution cycle using TCODE: KSV1 is enough for you requirment.
there first give the cycle name and the date valid from. then in the follwong screen enter the cycle name text . after that clcik on the attached segment button. give the segment name ,text.
in sender heeder tab:
sender rule :posted amount
share:100%
radio button =actual.
receiver rule= fixed percentages
var.portion type : actual cost.
in sender/receiver tab :
sender:
cost center : here give the cost center group ( first create teh 32 sender cost centers as one group using tcode: KSH1)
cost elemnet : give cost element group or the cost element range.
receiver:
cost center: group the 2 receiver cost centers ( or if they are in range give teh range).
receiver tracing TAB:
give the percentage : 80 and 20 for the respective cost centers.
hope its helpful.
thanks. -
Distribution cycle error in PCA
Hi All,
I have an issue.
Through user defined layout, the Statistical key figures have been
updated into the Profit Center Accounting.
Then when the Distribution Cycle is run on the basis of Statistical Key
Figures, it is not happening giving an error saying the system could
not find the receivers. Kindly give necessary
inputs so that I can solve this problem.
Solution will be rewarded.
Regards,
Karthick Scheck stastical key creation. when you create stastical key figure if you have given fixed value there is no need to post document every month. if variable key figure is given post document every month. check for this
-
Assessment Cycle VS Distribution Cycle
Hello Frds,
I am having tough time to know difference between Assessment Cycle VS Distribution Cycle.
1) Steps to Define these Cycles
2) Simple Scenarios would be great help
I understand that Distribution is used to allocate Primary costs and Assessment is used to allocate Primary and secondary costs.
Appreciate your help!
JagHi,
The main difference between Assessment cycle and Distribution cycle is - in case of Assessment we use secondary cost element.
An example to highlight the difference is as under:
Common Costs incurred for example for Factory Cafeteria are booked to Cost Center - Z using primary cost element 400100 (Amount $ 100). During period end closing the costs are be allocated to Cost Centers A, B and C in the ratio of 50%, 20% and 30% respectively.
Distribution:
Sender Rule: Posted Amounts
Sender Cost Center - Z
Sender Cost Element - 400100
Receiver Cost Centers are A, B and C
In Receiving Tracing factor - we specify the percentages for each cost center.
When distribution cycle is executed. Cost Center Z will be credited by $ 100 and Cost Center A, B and C will be debited with $50, $20 and $30. All the postings will be made using the primary cost element 400100.
Assessment:
<b>Assessment Cost Element: 600100</b>.
Sender Rule: Posted Amounts
Sender Cost Center - Z
Sender Cost Element - 400100
Receiver Cost Centers are A, B and C
In Receiving Tracing factor - we specify the percentages for each cost center.
When assessment cycle is executed. Cost Center Z will be credited by $ 100 and Cost Center A, B and C will be debited with $50, $20 and $30.
In Assessment all the postings will be made using Assessment Cost Element - which is secondary cost element.
The advantage of Assessment is the original postings made to the primary cost element are retained.
In this example, if we execute a report for Cost Center Z for Cost Element 400100, we can still display the values. If we execute the report for cost element 400100 and 600100 together, the value will be zero.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks
Murali. -
Hi
When I run the distribution cycle i am getting the error message " the segment contails no receivers" our version is ECC 5.0, is there any correction or any OSS notes would help to fix this error, i checkded the OSS but all the corrections are for previous versions
Appreciate for any help.
Thank you.If this is the problem relating to distributing based on Net Sales, what have you defined as your receivers?
The way distribution based on Net Sales works is:
1. It looks for the Tracing Factor - in your case, it is Actual Statistical Posting.
2. It checks to see if the Receivers have any such postings - so if you are distributing costs from one Cost Centre to another Cost Centre, make sure the receiving Cost Centre has some Actual Statistical Postings of Revenue (which should again match the Cost Elements you defined for the Tracing Factor).
3. It then calculates the amount to be Distributed based on the Net Sales values in the receiving Cost Centre and the Receiver Tracing Factor weightage defined by you - thus, if you allocated 10% as the weightage and the Net Sales value in the Cost Centre is $3000, it will allocate $300 to that Cost Centre.
If you are getting a no valid receivers error, try posting some Actual Revenues to the Receiving Cost Centre before you run your distribution.
Cheers. -
If WBS can be sender in distribution cycle?
Hi,
We post the expense to both cost center and WBS element in FI document, but when we do distribution, this amount doesn't display in sender. If we only post it to cost center, then we can see the amount when we run distribution.
I want to know:
1. If WBS can be sender in distribution cycle?
2. Can we add more sender object in KSV3 and how?
Thanks in advance!HI,
there is only 1 real acount assignment in CO (and up to 3 statistical account asignments). So an expense posted to WBS + Cost center is always real on WBS and only statistical at cost center.
A stat. cost center posting cannot be distributed using this cost-center as a sender, it needs to be processed further by using the real account assignment.
Nevertheless check SAPNET note 605281, this should answer your questions more detailed than just YES to both of them.
Best regards, Christian -
Diff between periodic and distribution cycle
Dear All,
What is the difference between Periodic reposting and distribution cycle. Where all i have to use periodic reposting and where all i have to use distribution cycle.
Regards
Vasantha> Dear All,
> What is the difference between Periodic
> reposting and distribution cycle. Where all i have
> to use periodic reposting and where all i have to
> use distribution cycle.
<b>Period reporting:
U want to make correction posting in Co module u will use periodic posting. For example in a document u have wrongly entered Cost center and u want to make correction u will use periodic posting.
Distribution is totally different from periodic reposting: Here u move values from one cost center to one or more cost center by cycles.Say from service cost center to production cost center.</b>
> Regards
> Vasantha -
Unable to create the Distribution cycle with WBS Element as Receiver
Dear SAP Friends,
I am creating the Distribution cycle in KSV1, Sender is Cost center and Receiver is WBS element.
Once i select Receiving tracing factor Tab i am getting the error like :
Message :
No valid receiver entries exist
Message no. GA015
Diagnosis
You have established a group of receivers by entering either intervals or groups in the selection criteria. However, in the master data check, the SAP System cound not find any valid receivers in your selected group.
System Response
The single value entry screen is not shown.
Procedure
Check your entries for the selection criteria. It is possible that the master data is locked. You can get more info be choosing "Error log...".
Please let me know how we need to create the Assesment cycle for WBS elements as receivers and Cost centre as Sender.
Let me know in this Regard ASAP..
Regards,
AnandWe are encountering a simiilar situation related to Cost Center Assessements to a Work Order (Order Category 30) I'm thinking the promble is related to a similar situation that you had with a WBS.
Thanks,
Lou -
Assessment and Distribution Cycles
Hi
We are yet to carry forward the GL account balances (both balance sheet and PL) from 2008 to 2009 in FI module.
Can we run the assessment and the distribution cycles for the month of January without carrying the GL account balances to 2009? OR do we need to carry the GL account balances first to run the two cycles
ThanksHi Trishan,
It's not a good idea to run distibution and assessment before carrying forward GL balances. You can check the documentation in help.sap.com. Please check note 110249. This note gives you additional advantage in balance carry forward and distribution. For FI-SL, EC-PCA and FI-GL, the same balance carry forward program is used.
Regards,
Abhisek
Maybe you are looking for
-
I recently tried to upgrade my call manager in a lab environment from 9.1.1 to 9.1.2 but failed. The error stated that connection had been lost after 2 hours into it. Connect using CLI. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Steve
-
When I get songs and put them on my itunes accout on my computer I used to be able to rename them right clicking, going to "get info" and then renaming everything I wanted like song name, album and artwork. I also use to be able to click on the song
-
Time stamp for each DML in spool file
Hi, I need to know how much time is taking for each delete statement in sql file. this is my sql file with dml statements. set serveroutput on; set time on; spool C:\PN\PN\temp_spool.log delete from tmp_test1; commit; delete from tmp_test21; commit;
-
LINUX : Webcam mic non-functional on Toshiba Satellite T215D-S1150
I've been trying to get the webcam mic on my Toshiba Satellite T215D-S1150 notebook/netbook to work in Linux Mint 9 Isadora KDE 64-bit to no avail. My model has a Realtek ALC269 audio chipset combined with an ATI southbridge ( ATI Technologies Inc SB
-
Remove VPP Token from Profile Manager
Hello, I recently set up a test OSX Mavericks server and enrolled our VPP for testing purposes. To continue testing other options, I signed up for a Meraki account, and wanted to see how their VPP process compared with OSX Server. However, when I tri