Cust sends EDI with incorrect payment terms

Hello SAP Gurus-
Do controls exists in SAP ECC 6.0 that will place orders on hold once customer sends order via EDI with incorrect payment terms?  We have situations where customer is remitting EDI with net 45 and in customer master the payment terms are net 60. 
They are going through the system and we don't know how to stop them.  What can we do to control this?  We would like the order to go on hold so that we can manage without the orders print and shipping.  Is this a configuration change?  If so, where?
Thank you!!

Hi,
In your payment Terms configuration, you need to enter 11 in discount percentage 2 as blank and discount days 2 as 11. Then system will not calculate discount from the 11th day. If you dont enter then system will populate the discount even after the discount date is over.
Hope this helps
Regards
Mahendra

Similar Messages

  • Sales order blocked for credit with status "Payment Terms"

    Hi Experts,
    Sales order is blocked for credit, as when i refer the t.code vkm3 or vkm1, the status of blocking showing as "Payment Term". Geenrally the status of credit block would be 'Old item', Dynamic check', value etc.
    My question here is how the sales order is blocked with status "Payment Terms", and what is the role of payment terms in credit management.
    regards
    Vivek.

    Hi  Vivek,
    The Standard Cr. management  ( Automatic credit check) of SAP has Critical Fields Check - payment terms is one of them,
    If it is being changed in sales order (other than maintained in Customer master) the sales order will go for credit block
    Thanks
    Dilip S

  • Issue with Vendor Payment Terms

    Hi Gurus,
    We're facing an issue with the Payment Terms of a Vendor in our SRM system.
    In R/3 the Vendor has Payment Term 'A' but when we create a PO for this vendor it appears with Payment Term 'B' (PT from SRM I think)
    The correct PT is 'A' (the one from R/3).
    Does anyone know if the PT are saved in SRM side also and where to check this information??
    I can check in R/3 with code XK03 but from SRM side -in code BP- I can't find PT data for this vendor.
    Regardss.

    Hi,
    Payment term is different in PO when compared to ECC, the following could be anyone of the reasons :
    01. PLease check the payment term value in CONTRACT; if you assigned contract as SOS in PO for ECS
    02. Please check he tpayment term value in BBPMAININT where you can maintain different payment terms manually.
    I hope the above information is very helpful to you.
    Thanks
    Rajesh K

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • I have a problem with Incorrect payment Who Can I Turn to off this payment

    I have a problem with Incorrect payment Who Can I Turn to off this payment
    about receipt No.111032735561

    These are the steps I performed on my own system many months ago. I could not view PDF files in Firefox with both Adobe Reader and Foxit installed.
    #Close Firefox (File > Exit '''''OR''''' Firefox button > Exit)
    #If you have not already done so, uninstall Adobe Reader 9.4.5 using Windows Start > Settings > Control Panel > Add or Remove Programs, click on the item, click Remove. You may need to restart your system.
    #Open Foxit in your programs list Windows Start > Programs
    #*on the Foxit menu, click Tools > Preferences
    #*click File Associations and be sure "Display PDF in browser" is checked then click "Make Default PDF Viewer" then click OK
    #*close Foxit Reader (File > Exit)
    #Start Firefox
    #*Open the Applications panel (Tools > Options > Applications '''''OR''''' Firefox button > Options > Options > Applications)
    #*type '''pdf''' in the search box; you should see "Foxit Reader PDF document"
    #*in Action column, click the down arrow at the far right end
    #*choose "Use Foxit Reader plugin for Mozilla (in Firefox)'
    #**if the full name does not display, place the cursor over the item to see the full name in a tooltip box
    #Test on a pdf file from the internet
    #*If there is no toolbar at the top of the PDF display in the tab (just a blue strip), tap the F8 key to get the Basic toolbar, or right-click the blue strip at the top to display/not display other toolbars by clicking on them (checked=display; un-checked=do not display)
    '''If this reply solves your problem, please click "Solved It" next to this reply when <u>signed-in</u> to the forum.'''

  • Vendor invoie for multiple POs with different payment terms

    Hi,
    We have a vendor which send a single invoice for multiple POs which have different payment terms. Now if we create a single invoice in MIRO, then only a payment term can be applied.
    However user want to pay to the vendor corresponding to the PO terms.
    Please let us know any way apart from creating multiple MIRO documents.
    Regds,
    Nand

    Hi,
    You can achieve so in standard SAP.
    Go to OBY6 and activate the check box "Enable Amount Split" in your company code. Then in MIRO, a new tab will appear in the header as "Amount Split"
    In this tab, you can split the vendor invoice in multiple lines with respective payment method and payment term.
    I hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Unable to Create PO for a Vendor with Particular payment terms

    Hi All,
    we have a scenarion in SRM 7.0 system where  the PO is ending up in error in SRM  for a vendor. In BBP_PD the error message says "Enter payt terms"  " enter GR Non Valuated".
    Now in my SRM system i can see the PO has got the payment terms and PO is for single account assignment.  i have generated the BAPI data for the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and can confirm the erro is coming form backend and in the bapi the paymnet terms is correctly passed in the header record.
    I am not sure why this error from backend..   have anyone encountered similar issue.
    anything to check with paymet terms in backed. i have another payment terms working  and few of them are not working.
    cheers
    Iftekhar Alam.

    Note 1350184 - Payment terms from PO not transferred to backend
    BBP_PDHGP-PMNTTRMS
    Check payment term is available
    Have you creted this payterm from SRM or pulled from ECC ?
    Note 1350185 - Payment terms from PO not transferred to backend
    check each data in BBP_PAYTERM in the value and match with ecc payterm table. some times some conditions are misinterupted in SRM
    for ex.
    Muthu

  • MM INVOICE created with different Payment Terms and 2 differents PO.

    I will explain with an example to understand better the issue and why this could happen, (for the same Co.Code):
    On 05.09.2011, 5203795529 was posted with payment terms D030.
    At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
    Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
    On 12.09.2011, 5203806574 was posted with payment terms D030.
    At that time, PO #: 4501105395 was having payment terms D030 while PO #: 4501232207 was having payment term D031.
    Invoice 5203795529 was posted successfully.
    In OCT, user receives another invoice for this 2 POs (4501232207 & 4501105395) and trying to post MIRO again but this time, user encountered error 'Payment terms in purchase order 4501232207 differ from current terms'. In order to proceed, user has changed payment term for 4501105395 from D030 to D031 on 17.10.2011 and proceed with invoice posting without error. 5203878342 was posted on 17.10.2011.
    The vendor always has the same Payment Term: D031
    Now the question is, why user is able to post without any problem previously even though there's different payment terms on both POs and not now anymore?.
    Thanks

    Thanks Jayavar,
    Nobody has changed anything, (I mean the PO Payment terms),  until October in PO. 4501105395
    The error message is when the user try to post with MIRO PO´s (4501232207 & 4501105395):
    "Terms of payment in purchase order 4501232207 (always with Payment term D031), differ from current terms"
    Message no. M8349
    Diagnosis:
    The terms of payment in the current invoice differ from those in the current purchase order 4501232207, other terms of payment were stipulated:
    Terms of payment key D031
    1st cash discount period 31 days 0,000%
    Either you have selected more purchase orders with different terms of payment, or you have changed the terms of payment manually.
    But the strange thing is in SEP, there's already this difference & there is no problem posting the invoice & the problem only comes when in OCT.
    Thanks and Rgs
    Francisco

  • Incoming EDI Invoice INVOIC02 - Payment Terms

    I am testing a scenario for incoming EDI invoice. Which segment\field does the payment term come in? Does it need to be mapped to a SAP payment term in some table? Will this payment term override the one copied from PO at the time of Invoice Receipt?

    Hi,
    It is stored in the field ZTERM of segment E1EDK01. This should be same as defined in OBB8 in SAP.
    This will override the other defaults.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • AR Invoice with Installment Payment Terms

    Hi to All,
    We have an invoice where the payment terms are based on installment. The installment is for 18 months.  Automatic cash receipts have been applied correctly for Installment 1 and Installment.
    Our situation is this where we want to apply an On Account receipt to installment 3.  When we query for the installment 3 invoice we are getting the following error message:
    "FRM-41830: List of Values contains no entries"
    Basically the the invoice is not being queried.  We checked the invoice, it is complete but the installments 3-18 are open.  What we like to know if we can preform an on account receipt to an installment invoice...if so what setup do we need to look for.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hi Bharat,
    Thanks for your reply.  We checked the invoice payment schedule in the tables are 4th to 18th are all open.  We have also verified this thru the forms and same appears.
    So when we go to receipts and attempt to apply on accounts funds to the invoice.  We cant query for the invoice.  The following oracle forms message appears:  "FRM-41830:  List of Values contains no entries"

  • Is it possible to compare vendor quotations with leadtime & payment terms?

    Good day,
    I am wondering if the system can be configured to compare vendor quotations on by criteria other than pricing?  My client would want to compare vendor quotations received using lead time, terms of payment as well as pricing.  Any ideas?  If possible, how can this be achieved?

    hi
    Your requirement is fulfill with only scenario of vendor evaluation, but you can crate quotation ME41 maintain quotation & price comparison with ME49
    To determine a vendor's price level, the system compares the vendor's effective price with the market price for the material.
    The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained a market price for the material or the material group.
    If not, the system calculates the market price which is equal to the average of the effective prices for all vendors supplying this material. Prices from purchase orders and prices for subcontracting are dealt with separately.
    The system then applies the effective price for the vendor from the conditions.
    The vendor's effective price is then compared with the market price and the percentage variance determined.
    The system then assigns a score to the variance in accordance with the settings made in Customizing.
    This score is valid for the material, that is, at info record level. Since the score the vendor receives for a subcriterion is based not on an individual material, but on the total of all the materials he supplies, the following steps are necessary:
    The system repeats the comparison between effective price and market price for each of the vendor's materials.
    The system calculates an average from the sum of the scores determined. This average represents the vendor's score for the subcriterion Price Level.
    regards
    ronny

  • How to handle Order/Invoice with split Payment terms ?

    Hi we are implementing 11.5.9 for one of our sites...
    we have a situation wherein we charge the customer on placing the Order, on shipping the
    goods and on their acceptance...
    For example,Assume total order is $200,000. 10% on placing order; 20% on shipping: and 70%
    when customer accepts.
    10% - 20,000
    20% - 40,000
    70% - 140,000
    We need to issue invoices at each stage too...
    Can anyone suggest a way out ??
    thanks in advance..

    Hi,
    After much thought, My knowledge took me to Customization way to this Scenario.
    1. Define Order type to close immediately after delivery.
    2. Design a Invoice Print report, which will bring details into a TEMP table from Order depending on Order status.
    i.e. Order booked -- 1 line inserted into temp table with 10% of order amount and status as Booked.
    The Invoice will be printed using this details and an interface program should fire, which will interface this line to ra_interface_lines_all.(Plan program as per your needs. This is just a test case I have taken)
    3. On next run, after delivery, the Line status will change to Delivered, which will insert another line into TEMP table which current record flag 'Y'. Prints and Interfaces the invoices to AR.
    Similarly next step.
    Design of this TEMP table and other validations, you can discuss with Technical Consultant. I think, we can achieve this only with this minimum customization.
    Standard application is just giving workarounds and not perfect solution to this.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Report with Payment Terms

    Hi,
    Do you know a report where I can see a list of purchase order together with the payment terms?
    Thanks!
    Sofia

    Hi
    Standar report is not available
    By using table you can get the same output
    1. Tcode: SE16, enter reqd input fields (ex ; company code)
    2. Goto menu - setting -selection - Form list - choose fields, po number, & terms of payment
    3 Execute
    Raju

  • Standard Report to see list of purchase orders with  Payment terms

    Hi  ,
    I want to see list of purchase orders with corresponding  Payment terms.
    Is there any standard report available ?
    I checked ME2L,  ME2M , ME80FN and ME81N ...
    But there is no option to add payment term field ZTERM in layout option.
    kindly let me know if there is any way..
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hari priya

    Hi krishna ,
    Thanks for your prompt reply..
    I know we can use dynamic selection for payment term as input seelction...
    but in i want to display payment terms  for list of purchase order in output.
    Is there any way to add zterm- payment term field in output layout of reports.
    Thanks &Regards,
    Hari priya

  • Payment terms with 50% of value of the invoice  in diferent dates

    Hi Sap Gurus,
    I would like to request your help for teh following issue.
    We need to use a SAP condition that 50% of the invoice is payd immediatly and 50% in 30 days
    How can do that?

    You have to create 3 payment terms
    Ex:
    1st step
    create payment terms
    Create 0005 payment term as Immediate
    create 0006 payment term as 30 days due
    create 0007 payment term as installment payment term (Here you need to check installment payment term)
    2nd step
    create installment payment terms
    create 0007 50% with 0005 payment term
    create 0007 50% with 0006 payment term
    I think your problem will be solved
    thanks &regards
    shankar chitupolu
    Edited by: chitupolushankar on Oct 24, 2011 6:09 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • After charging my iphone  i switched it on and the lock screen is magnified and i cant unlock it

    i have an iphone 5s. the battery went flat so i switched on to charge. after 5 minutes the screen lit up but was magnified and i cant unlock it.

  • KO88 - Document Type

    Dear All, Want to change the standard document type SA that is used to settlle maintenance orders , Tcode KO88 from the standard document type SA to any other New Document type . e.g ZA. How / From where to change ? Kind regards Swati

  • How the sales order header status update?

    Hello, In the sales order header "STATUS" tab is there, under this status tab we can find OBJECT status if we click that object status it shows the Object number,Object category,status profile and status with status no. on which bases this status wil

  • Application deployment to jboss 5.1.0 GA

    Hi all, I have deployed my application developed in jdev 11gR1 to jboss 5.1.0 ga I have started the jboss server in default mode i have copied the listed jars to the default/lib folder adflibfilter.jar adflogginghandler.jar adfm.jar adf-share-base.ja

  • Since the last reboot, some functions of Photoshop CC just disappeared !!

    Hi there ! Since my last reboot 2hrs ago, my Photoshop CC seems to have lost some shortcuts paired with my Wacom Intuos 5 tablet ! I explain, when I use the brush tool, I make CTRL/ALT/left-right to decrease or increase my brush size, it was just wor