Custom feilds in Intrastat report

Hi,
We have got a requirement to extract the details from the standard & custom feilds to the Intrastat report. Understand that there are some User Exits for this purpose. Would appreciate if any one throws some input on this.
Regards
Sudhakar

Iam very much aware of the fact that this is a statutory report. My client is using the Fiscal Rep to get the invoice from the respective country (both inout & output tax) for which their details has to be obtained in the report. The reason is they want to reconcile the extracted report and then file with same with the tax authorities. As we are maintaining the Fiscal Rep in a custom table, we need to pull that data using some User Exit.
Hope this clarifies.
Regards
Sudhakar

Similar Messages

How to add custom feild in std report 2kee

Hi,
How we can add custom field in standard report 2kee.
I need one extra field to add in 2kee report for the same is there any customization req.
Regards
Ravi

IF you are in ECC 6.0, you can use enhancement option or if you are below the version, you would have to copy into Z program and then create Ztransaction for this. In Z program, you can add whatever you want.

Intrastat report in drop-ship process

Hi,
I have drop-ship scenario where plant country belongs to France ( FR) but actual shipment happens from Taiwan(TW).
Butin the sale order we use plant as France(FR) and shipping point as Taiwan(TW).Since these are drop ships dispatched from non EU countries i.e in my case Taiwan(TW), the intrastat report ignores it. i.e on the invoice document in the "Trade/Custom" tab both "Country of origin" and "Dispatch country" will show as France and the same is picked in Intrastat reporting.
But this is wrong since actual shipment has been done from Taiwan country . Therefore how can we change this to Taiwan i.e correct country. One way is change in the user exit of billing.
but is there any other way, i mean process wise ?. If we do third order sales process would this resolve problem. if so how can this be achieved.
What i have noticed is even in third party sales process it has the same problem.
Thankyou in advance

Thankyou for your reply.
even if i use Foreign Trade concept , but my plant in sales order is "France" and shipping point as "Taiwan", then the problem is instrastat will ignore Taiwan as a departure country , it shows only France as departure country , but it should be Taiwan. Therefore how can we resove this problem.
I dont want to change dispatch country as "Taiwan" using user-exit in invoice-> "customs/Trade" tab , because if i change this field then instrastat report will pick-up . But withoug user-exit how can we change via config or process wise.
Thanks in advance

San Marino to be included for Italy Intrastat reporting

Hello All,
We have to include San Marino in EU Country Members for Italy Intrastat Reporting.
San Marino should be visible in folder "INtrastat" under folder "EU Countries" after executiing transaction "ENGR".
TX "ENGR" > PERIODIC DECLARATION.
we have already maintained SM (San marino) as a EU country in table T005.
Regards,
Ajit

Ajit
Did you try setting up SM in T Code VEB2- Special Rule Country / Region
Generally check your Foreign Trade (FT) settings, especally here:
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Periodic Declarations/Control Data
and
SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Legal Control/Foreign Trade Data by Country of Destination
Also there are several OSS notes if you search by keyword 'San Marino'. Check them out.

Intrastat reporting- Incorrect PO picked

Hi Gurus,
I need to find out why and how a particular PO is being picked by the MEIS report? I was always in the belief that once the import procedure is maintained at the PO item level, if any GR/ IR takes place, then these would be reported. But I am not able to understand, while even after removing the import data in a PO, it is being picked. Pls could you throw some light on this. Your timely help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Madan

How could you delete the import data?
You probably deleted a value in the import data of the PO. But this does not make the import data going away.
First of all you define in customizing when the import screens are coming up.
Usually when you and your vendor belong both to a different country in the EU.
Then, the PO is subject for Intrastat reporting.
But reported are only x-border movements.
The PO is not picked if the movement (good receipt has not yet been posted.
But once you have a movement, then it depends further if the invoice receipt happened in the same month .
If yes then the movement is selected for the report.
If not, dependend on local country laws, the movement is either valuated with PO price, or not reported in this month. Then it will be reported in next month, either with the invoice value (if the Invoice wil be received in the meantime) or with PO price if the inovice is still not received.
Why would you like to exclude this PO and its movements from Intrastat? Why dont you exclude the PO number directly from the selection screen in MEIS?

Intrastat Report in ECC 6 for Inter Company Billing

Hi Experts,
Need your input.
In business case, Company code A raise intercompany invoice on Company B for Goods deliverd by Co A directly to End customer of Co B.
Since there is no actual Physical goods receipt by Company B, the intrastat report is not fetching any data as goods are directly delivered to End Customer by Co A.
Can Somebody help me ..how can we customise...the Report so that Company B will have Goods Arrival Report data.

Hi Anil,
I am sorry , i can't get you. You mean abaper will enter temp data .. in Dev server not in PRD..
What do u means by that... since we want this report in PRD...so ultimately the same report needs in PRD also...and u mean that abaper will create temp data in Dev server only...
can u please be more elaborative...in steps..

Re: Intrastat Report - Excluding Non Stock Items

Hi,
Currently I am in the process of compiling an intrastat report for our last three periods, as prior to this process, the report was being configured manually.
However, I need to know how to exclude a Non Stock Item - i.e. Transport Charges which our company has present in the Items List, but does not use to issues or receive goods.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Kind Regards

the wizzard is nothing else than the combination of the customizing steps for Intrastat. The only thing you can do in the wizzard is to define the inclusion/exclusion indicators.
These are the indicators that you need to enter manually in ME21N to the item.
It does not matter if you start Intrastat slection from the ENGR cockpit transaction or directly with MEIS transaction, the same selection screen appears, and it does not allows you to exclude only certain items of a PO. you can only exclude the whole PO in the selection variant.
Please check again the 2 options I gave you earlier.

Columns missing in my generated INTRASTAT report...

Hi all,
can anyone tell me why my INTRASTAT report is missing the following columns:
Business Transaction Type (Export/Import), Destination Region (Import), Region of Origin (Export) and
ModeOfTrnsprt-Border (Export/Import). They are , along with the other columns that appears, all set in
"Foreign Trade: Declara. to Auth.: Check Incompleteness" (Txcode: VEB1)
The values for Business Transaction Type were maintained with TxCode:OVE5
The values for Region were maintained with TxCode: OVK2/VE70
The necessary customizing for the above were done in TxCodes: OVE5; OVK2/VE70
ModeOfTrnsprt-Border turned showed out in the Incompletion log of the INTRASTAT report because it showed that it hadn't been maintained in the vendor master data.
Once again, can anyone tell me why the above columns are missing in my INTRASTAT report?
Kind regards,
Joe

Hi Jürgen,
your last answer threw a lot of light on my problem, however, my problem still stands so I'm going to try to explain it a little better:
According to the INTRASTAT Declaration found in SAP,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/2b/274520995111d1b4e30000e82d81b0/content.htm,
"Description of goods", field (6) is required for Germany and the execution of transaction OVE1 shows that there exists Commodity Code with Description for Germany but it isn't shown in the INTRASTAT report.
Furthermore, I checkedout the table VEIAV and found the column "Comm./imp. code no." but didn't find the column "Description...". The "Description of goods" exists both in the material master and the billing document, so how do I go about getting it into the INTRASTAT report?
Kind regards,
Joe

PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

All,
Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
The help message says:
The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
Many Thanks,
Colm

Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
processing under contract.
u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
(Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
(nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
(Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
(e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
products.
Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
Examples:
1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
purchased by the domestic contractor.
As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
gearbox unit.
This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
emblem mounted on the vehicle.
Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
conserving).
This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

Intrastat reporting

Hi,
We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
we have 1 PO for which we did the following
1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
Kindly correct me if my understanding is worng.
Thanks & Regards
R.M.

Ruchir Mishra wrote:
Hi,
>
> We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
>
> we have 1 PO for which we did the following
> 1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
> 2. reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
> 3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
> 4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
>
> Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
>
> 1. There is entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR in july.
>
> 2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find one more entry as per the invoice posted in Sep.
>
> Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
> As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
I have some doubts and comments
How is it possible that you reverse a movement of July in September?
SAP allows only posting in current and previous period. Hence you cannot have reversed the a JULY receipt in September.
You get an Intrastat entry for August, because you had no invoice in July and no invoice in August, but you have to report a movement latest a month after its occurance. If the invoice is not present then this movement is reported with the PO value.
You wrote you reversed it in September with 101 (usually you reverse with 102 movement), can this be the root cause to have it twice in the September report?
Before you execute Intrastat technically in SAP, you should already know about the procedure outlined by your government.
Usually cancellations/corrections have to be reported manually in a special form.
see the general guide in
https://www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task=noticesixty

Customer and Vendor ageing report by ItemGroup@%@#$%@#$??

Hi All
How do we get Customer and Vendor ageing report by "ItemGroup"?
I know there is a standard report in Business One which gives you the ageing report by Business Partner Group. But I dont know whether it is possible to get by "ItemGroup". Please help me and excuse me for weird requirement..
Thanks

Hi Gordon,
that query is actually designed for getting the purchase reports with all the excise and other tax related information per line item in the marketing document. my requirement is something different than this where the client wants to see the ageing report by Itemgroup.
Since ageing is based on the invoice due date it looks difficult to bifurcate the each individual line item, its group, its line total and their due date. means we should add all the open invoices' line items to be grouped with its total based on the due date. any other way to solve this?
thanks

Customer Open Balance Aging Report S_ALR_87012178

hello,
we are using this report Customer Open Balance Aging Report S_ALR_87012178 but when run, it brings customers' names from VD03 search field, instead it would be handy to see full names from Name-field. I understand S_ALR_87012178 is a static report, but my question would be is there any other transaction/report which shows the same but with customers' full name?
thanks in advance

S_ALR_87012178 is the only standard customer aging report.
Following two solutions I could think of to fit your requirements.
Develop a custom report by copying standard customer reports that have full customer name and make changes according to your need.
Or
In report S_ALR_87012178 the customer name is populated in Address field. So you can use this field as your customer name and develop a custom report.
Thanks

Intrastat report Spain. Credit memos posted not appearing in report

Hi
I have a issue where the debit notes raised to vendor are not appearing in Intrastat declaration.
How this debit and credit notes must be taken by Intrastat ? This problem is there since the Intrastat report is being used.
Is there any specific configuration for this or
is there any period check because of which the debit notes are not picked?
The reason is po was created in Feb 2009 and continuous GR and invoice postings happened in subsequent months which are all captured in Intrastat report. A debit note was raised in Sep 2009 which does not appear in the report.
Request your expertise and help to resolve this issue.
Thank you

credit memos are not supported in SAP as you can read in docu:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo2005ao/helpdata/en/F3/4392579F5DC24E9FBE2FA84E9E7660/frameset.htm
Please read the local Intrastat guide, in many countries it just says that you have to file a correction per paper form to your statiscal office.
SAP explains this as well in OSS note 374682:
If a credit memo refers to a billing document which was already declared to authorities, proceed as follows:Here, you should create a written correction to the statistical office.Specify a data record to which the credit memo refers.
Check the documents of the statistical offices for information on when you have to declare the credit memo (limits for values and quantities).*********************************************************************

Intrastat report generation

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem with VX99 T code .this T code is related "Foreign trade: Cockpit" where we are supposed to generate the INTRASTAT report for the data arrivals (purchase orders) in FRANCE. as of now in the intrastat reporting the data (purchase orders history ) which is related to 122 (EKBE-VGABE = '1' and EKBE-SHKZG = 'H') movement type is getting deleted by the sap standard functionality. the code is available in the the program (RMIMSELS) at line no 7522. but the requirement is what ever the data which is related to 122 movement type should be included in the INTRASTAT reporting for franse.
if it is possible please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks and regards
Mohan

It is not possible in standard, check for any notes
Regards
Chandrasekhar

Statistical Value in MEIS for INTRASTAT reporting

Hello,
From reveiwing related posts I understand that the statistical value on the INTRASTAT report comes from a system default exchange rate that uses the average exchange rate from the border crossing rate (GRWR condition on the PO) and the exchange rate on the invoice.
What is the exact calculation that is being used to determine the statistical value on the MEIS report?
Thanks,

Thanks very much for the link.
We do have the GRWR conditions set up, and the statistical value is populating correctly on the PO.
The issue I'm having is that I can't properly explain how the reported statistical value (VEIAV- GRENZEWEAK) is calculated.
For example:
VEIAV - GRENZWEAK is 5,405.86 SEK
GRWR on PO 572.03 EUR 5,299.22 SEK (Ex rate: 9.26389)Goods Receipt 504.79 EUR 4,681.78 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)
Freight 40.00 EUR 370.99 SEK (Ex rate: 9.27470)Invoice 503.00 EUR 4,770.43 SEK (Ex rate: 9.48395)
Do you know how SAP arrives at 5,405.86 SEK with these inputs?
Thanks,

Custom feilds in Intrastat report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for